Abstract
Background
Q fever, a zoonosis due to Coxiella burnetii infection, exhibits sexual dimorphism; men are affected more frequently and severely than women for a given exposure. Here we explore whether the severity of C. burnetii infection in mice is related to differences in male and female gene expression profiles.
Methodology/Principal Findings
Mice were infected with C. burnetii for 24 hours, and gene expression was measured in liver cells using microarrays. Multiclass analysis identified 2,777 probes for which expression was specifically modulated by C. burnetti infection. Only 14% of the modulated genes were sex-independent, and the remaining 86% were differentially expressed in males and females. Castration of males and females showed that sex hormones were responsible for more than 60% of the observed gene modulation, and this reduction was most pronounced in males. Using functional annotation of modulated genes, we identified four clusters enriched in males that were related to cell-cell adhesion, signal transduction, defensins and cytokine/Jak-Stat pathways. Up-regulation of the IL-10 and Stat-3 genes may account for the high susceptibility of men with Q fever to C. burnetii infection and autoantibody production. Two clusters were identified in females, including the circadian rhythm pathway, which consists of positive (Clock, Arntl) and negative (Per) limbs of a feedback loop. We found that Clock and Arntl were down-modulated whereas Per was up-regulated; these changes may be associated with efficient bacterial elimination in females but not in males, in which an exacerbated host response would be prominent.
Conclusion
This large-scale study revealed for the first time that circadian rhythm plays a major role in the anti-infectious response of mice, and it provides a new basis for elucidating the role of sexual dimorphism in human infections.
Introduction
Social factors such as gender inequity can explain differences in the distribution of infectious diseases between men and women. As shown elsewhere, poor women may be at a disadvantage in their ability to access quality health care [1]. However, biological differences are also responsible for part of the epidemiological variation observed between males and females in infectious diseases due to intra- and extracellular pathogens [2]. Gender-based biological differences also affect host immune responses to pathogens. Women elicit more vigorous humoral and cell-mediated immune responses than men in response to antigenic challenges, while men have frequently been observed to exhibit more aggressive and harmful inflammatory responses to pathogens [3]. Tuberculosis [4], [5] and Legionnaire's disease [6] are reported to be more prevalent and severe in men than in women. Although biological differences have been largely attributed to sex hormones [7], the precise nature of the cross-talk between sex and infection remains largely unknown.
Q fever is a zoonosis due to Coxiella burnetii, an intracellular bacterium [8], [9]. Following primary infection, half of infected patients experience acute Q fever. The disease is characterized by clinical polymorphism and includes fever, granulomatous hepatitis, and pneumonia. For a similar exposure risk, men are 2.5 times more likely to become symptomatic than women [10]. Hyperinflammatory Q fever with granulomatous hepatitis and auto-antibodies has been reported in male patients who respond poorly to antimicrobial agents [11]. In addition, Q fever complications are higher in males than in females. As a result, males represent 75% of patients diagnosed with C. burnetii endocarditis [12]. In mice, the severity of C. burnetii infection is also sex-dependent, with females exhibiting lower bacterial load than males. Ovariectomy increases the bacterial load in the liver and spleen, and this is corrected by 17β-estradiol treatment [13], demonstrating that estrogens limit tissue infection. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms that govern the differential responsiveness of males and females to bacterial infection are poorly understood. To investigate these differences, we adopted a large-scale approach consisting of a microarray covering the whole genome. Unexpectedly, 86% (2,379/2,777) of the probes that were modulated by C. burnetii infection were dependent on sex. We identified a specific pathway related to the circadian cycle in females that may control the severity of C. burnetii infections.
Results and Discussion
Mice were infected with C. burnetii for 24 hours, and changes in gene expression were investigated in liver cells. C. burnetii infection generated more transcriptional changes in males than in females. When samples were plotted according to the weight of variances due to sex and infection, principal component analysis (PCA) clearly discriminated males and females and revealed that the distance between uninfected and infected males was higher than that found between uninfected and infected females (Fig. 1A). A multiclass analysis identified 2,777 probes that were modulated in response to C. burnetii. These probes were classified into four distinct clusters (Fig. 1B). The first cluster is sex-independent and includes 398 probes (14% of the total) that were similarly regulated in both males and females. The other three clusters, representing the majority of probes modulated by C. burnetii infection (86% of the total), are sex-dependent: 1,459 probes (53%) were specifically modulated in males whereas 892 (32%) were specifically modulated in females. The fourth cluster of 28 probes is divergent between males and females, with 14 probes up-regulated in males and 14 up-regulated in females (for the list, see Table S1). Using in silico analysis, we related the modulated genes to the subcellular distribution of their encoded proteins (Fig. 2). In infected males, the modulated genes encode proteins that have a high degree of interconnection. These interactions spread across the membrane, underlying that a profound reorganization occurred at the membrane after infection. In infected females, there were less interactions between proteins encoded by modulated genes at the membrane level than in males, but the interconnection between the cytosol and the nucleus was apparently more developed. These results highlight important changes in transcription in male and female mice infected with C. burnetii.
It is known that nonsexual tissues and cells manifest sex-related differences in most animals including humans. Many of these differences are dependent on sex hormones but it is seems difficult to attribute other differences to hormones [14]. A microarray approach performed on long-lived mice has showed that 381 genes (on over 14,000 genes) are altered in these mice compared to wild type mice in a sex-independent manner while 110 genes are affected in a sex-dependent manner [15]. Our analysis take into account genes modulated in response to C. burnetii: these genes are included in two categories, namely sex-independent and sex-dependent genes. Unexpectedly, sex-dependent genes represent 86% of the total number of genes modulated in response to C. burnetii. Among them, the majority (80%) were not modulated upon sex in uninfected animals. It is well known that, in humans, the clinical expression of different infectious diseases including tuberculosis [5], Legionnaire's disease [6] and Q fever [10] is associated to sex. Sex has been often described as involved in the incidence of common infectious diseases such as pneumonia [16]. Similar results have been obtained in mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes [17] or Plasmodium berghei [18]. Bacterial sepsis, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in humans, is due to an exaggerated response of hosts [19]. The frequency and the severity of bacterial sepsis are also associated with sexual dimorphism [2], [20]. Interestingly, such differences are also found in isolated human circulating leukocytes [21] and animal models of endotoxemia [22]. Finally, only few data show that sex does not influence human infections: this has been reported for cerebrospinal [23] and soft tissue [24] infections.
The molecular mechanisms that underlie the differences between males and females in bacterial infections are only in part characterized. As sexual hormones may play a major role in the transcriptional responses to C. burnetii infection in male and female mice, we investigated the effect of castration on these responses. Castration shortened the distance between uninfected and infected males, reflecting less pronounced changes in gene expression (Fig. S1A). Castration did not substantially modify the impact of infection on females (Fig. S1B). After C. burnetii infection, the number of modulated probes designated as sex-independent remained remarkably constant in castrated mice (396 vs. 398 in intact mice). In contrast, among the sex-dependent probes, only 902 probes were modulated in castrated mice compared with 2,379 probes in intact mice, suggesting that sex hormones were responsible for more than 60% of the gene modulation (Fig. S2). This reduction was most significant in males: 378 probes were specifically modulated in castrated males (vs. 1,459 in intact males) compared to 516 in castrated females (vs. 892 in intact females), suggesting that testosterone was responsible for the major changes observed after C. burnetii infection. This finding is in line with previous studies suggesting the predominant effect of testosterone on sexual dimorphism [25], [26]. It is important to note that about 40% of sex-dependent genes that were modulated in response to C. burnetii were not linked to hormonal status. This is reminiscent of previous data that showed that sex differences are not completely abrogated or accentuated by hormone ablation or supplementation, respectively [27].
We next used functional annotation of the modulated genes to identify major pathways that were possibly involved in the response to C. burnetii infection. In the sex-independent cluster, four groups of enriched keywords were identified (Table 1). Group 1, with an enrichment score of 4.3, is related to early induction of the acute phase liver response. Acute phase response is a major function of the liver that contributes to bacterial clearance in acute Q fever [10]. The gene encoding serum amyloid A1–3 was expressed with a fold change (FC) of over 25. The genes encoding orosomucoid 1–3, serine peptidase inhibitor and complement components (C8a, C9) were also up-regulated. Group 2 (enrichment score of 3.9) is related to lipid metabolism and group 3 (enrichment score of 3.3) is related to steroid metabolism. Most of the genes annotated with keywords of groups 2 and 3 were down-regulated by a mean FC of 2. This finding is apparently related to disturbed lipid metabolism during C. burnetii infection since pronounced lipid infiltration and increased cholesterol have been reported in the livers of C. burnetii-infected guinea pigs [28]. In addition, C. burnetii replication requires free access to host cholesterol stores [29]. Group 4 is related to genes encoding proteins with a thrombospondin domain. Thrombospondin is a family of multifunctional proteins involved in coagulation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and immune regulation [30]. One of these genes (Spon2) is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition molecule known to recognize Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide and numerous gram negative bacteria [31]. Although some partners of thrombospondin such as αvβ3 integrin have been described as C. burnetii receptors [32], there is no evidence that Spon2 recognizes C. burnetii.
Table 1. Functional annotation of the sex-independent cluster.
Ontology | Keywords | P-value |
Acute phase response (ES : 4.3–25 genes)SAA1, SAA2, SAA3, SAA4, ORM3, SERPINA3N, C8a, C9 | ||
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Acute phase | 2.9×10−6 |
GO_BP | Acute-phase response | 6.4×10−6 |
GO_BP | Acute inflammatory response | 1.8×10−5 |
INTERPRO | Serum amyloid A protein | 8.6×10−5 |
SMART | SAA | 6.1×10−6 |
Lipid metabolism (ES : 3.9–38 genes)CRAT, ACOX1, ACOT2, ACOT5, EHHADH, ACAA1A, CPT1B, PLTP | ||
GO_BP | Fatty acid metabolic process | 1.3×10−7 |
GO_BP | Monocarboxylic acid metabolic process | 9.1×10−9 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Fatty acid metabolism | 8.4×10−6 |
BO_BP | Lipid metabolic process | 1.6×10−9 |
GO_CC | Peroxysome | 3.3×10−5 |
GO_CC | Microbody | 3.3×10−5 |
Steroid metabolic process (ES : 3.3–14 genes)STAR, IDI1, MOGAT1, LEPR, FABP5, PCTP, AKR1C18, FBP2, HMGCS1 | ||
GO_BP | Steroid metabolic process | 1.7×10−4 |
GO_BP | Alcohol metabolic process | 5.5×10−4 |
GO_BP | Cholesterol metabolic process | 6.8×10−4 |
GO_BP | Sterol metabolic process | 1.0×10−3 |
Thrombospondin (ES : 1.8–5 genes)SPON2, C9, SEMA5B, ADAMTS20, C8A | ||
SMART | TSP1 | 1.7×10−3 |
INTERPRO | Thrombospondin, type I | 1.9×10−3 |
The enrichment score (ES), the number of genes and example genes in each group of genes were indicated.
Functional annotation of genes that were modulated only in infected males identified four groups of keywords (Table 2). Groups 1 and 3 are related to signal transduction and cell-cell adhesion, respectively. Keyword group 2 is related to genes encoding defensins. Although defensins are peptides with antimicrobial properties [33], [34], their role against C. burnetii infection has never been reported. Defensins such as Defcr3, Hamp1 and Hamp2 were down-regulated in infected males, suggesting that the reduced expression of defensins favors early infection in males. Hepcidins (Hamp1 and Hamp2) reduce iron availability for invading microorganisms by reducing extracellular iron concentrations [35]. As has been recently suggested, greater iron availability in males may favor C. burnetii replication [36]. It has also been shown that hepcidins are differentially expressed in male and female mice [37], [38]. Keyword group 4 is related to cytokines and the Jak/Stat pathway. The gene encoding interleukin (IL)-10 was up-regulated in males. These results were confirmed by RT-PCR (Table S2), and a time course study showed that males overproduced interleukin (IL)-10 mRNA compared with females independently of the duration of infection (Fig. 3A). Note that the expression of the gene encoding Stat 3, a transcription factor known to be targeted by IL-10, was higher in males than in females. We previously showed that IL-10 enables monocytes to support C. burnetii replication [39], [40] and that chronic evolution of Q fever is associated with increased production of IL-10 [41]. However, to our knowledge, a link between IL-10 and sexual dimorphism in C. burnetii infection has never been reported. Interferon (IFN)-γ, which is critical for protection against intracellular bacteria and C. burnetii infection [42], was weakly modulated in male and female mice one day after infection as determined by microarray and RT-PCR (Table S2). A time course analysis revealed that the gene encoding IFN-γ was dramatically up-regulated at days 4 and 7 post-infection (Fig. 3B), suggesting that IFN-γ induces deleterious effects in parallel with the resolution of C. burnetii infection. The expression of the IL-6 gene was slightly up-regulated in females (Table S2), and a time course study showed that the IL-6 gene was dramatically over-expressed at days 4 and 7 post-infection, especially in females (Fig. 3C). After trauma-hemorrhage, IL-6 release by macrophages is suppressed in male mice but not in female mice [43], suggesting that sex and IL-6 production are related. Taken together, these results suggest that males develop an early anti-inflammatory response that may favor increased bacterial burden at the onset of infection and may promote antibody production in an IL-10-dependent manner. This may account for the presence of auto-antibodies in men with Q fever.
Table 2. Functional annotation of male-dependent cluster.
Ontology | Keywords | P-value |
Signal transduction (ES : 9.9–418 genes)EXTL1, CDH11, RHO, ADRA2B, IL12RB2, CD36 GLP2R, OLFR981 | ||
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Transmembrane | 1.2×10−9 |
GO_BP | Signal transduction | 3.9×10−7 |
GO_MF | Transmembrane receptor activity | 1.7×10−9 |
GO_BP | G-protein coupled receptor signal transduction | 4.1×10−7 |
INTERPRO | Olfactory receptor | 8.8×10−8 |
GO_GC | Transmembrane region | 2.0×10−6 |
Defensin (ES : 8.2–45 genes)DEFB3, DEFA1, DEFCR7, DEFCR17, DEFCR9, DEFCR25, HAMP2 | ||
SMART | DEFSN | 5.7×10−11 |
INTERPRO | Mammalian defensin | 1.7×10−10 |
GO_BP | Defense response to bacterium | 2.2×10−8 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Antimicrobial | 9.4×10−7 |
GO_BP | Defense response | 1.4×10−3 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Defensin | 1.2×10−6 |
Cell-cell adhesion (ES : 3.7–52 genes)CDH1, CDH4, FAIM2, MMD2, PCDHA5, PCDHB19, CDH11 | ||
INTERPRO | Cadherin | 2.9×10−7 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Cell adhesion | 2.8×10−4 |
GO_BP | Cell adhesion | 2.5×10−3 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Calcium | 3.0×10−3 |
Cytokines/Jak-STAT pathway (ES : 2.3–28 genes)IFNA1, IL5, PDGFA, IL1RN, STAT3, EGF,CXCL12, IL10, IL11, IFNG, IL13 | ||
BIOCARTA | Cytokines and Inflammatory response | 2.6×10−4 |
KEGG_PATHWAY | Jak-STAT signalling pathway | 1.7×10−3 |
KEGG_PATHWAY | Cytokin-Cytokin receptor interaction | 4.2×10−3 |
INTERPRO | Four-helical cytokine, core | 7.1×10−3 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Cytokine | 2.1×10−2 |
GO_MF | Cytokine activity | 2.0×10−2 |
The enrichment score (ES), the number of genes and example genes in each group of genes were indicated.
The specific signature of infected females, which includes 892 genes (Fig. 1B), was characterized by two major groups of keywords (Table 3): intracellular location and transcriptional activity, and unexpectedly, circadian rhythm. The latter pathway was further investigated with RT-PCR and network analysis. Circadian rhythm is controlled by an auto-regulated transcription-translation feedback loop that regulates the expression of rhythmic genes in a tissue-specific manner [44]. In liver cells, a significant number of clock-regulated genes are associated with the cell cycle and proliferation. Clock and Arntl form the positive limb of the transcriptional loop, while the Per and Cry protein families form the negative limb of the feedback loop by inhibiting their own Clock/Arntl-induced transcription [44]. The turnover of Per and Cry allows the cycle to begin again (Fig. S3). Microarray and RT-PCR data showed that Clock and Arntl expression were down-regulated in females infected with C. burnetii for one day while Per expression was up-regulated (Table S2). We questioned whether these variations were persistent because we had previously found that C. burnetii infection of liver cells peaks after four days and decreases thereafter [13]. The levels of Arntl and Clock transcripts remained constant in males over seven days, but in females, these transcripts declined at day one and increased thereafter to approach the number observed in males (Fig. 3D and 3E, respectively). The expression of Per2, which increased in females at day one, remained high during the seven days of the infection. In males, the expression of the Per2 gene increased at day four (Fig. 3F). The differences between males and females regarding the expression of Arntl, Clock and Per2 were lost after castration of the mice (Fig. S4). Taken together, these findings show that C. burnetii infection affected the circadian rhythm of female mice. These results are distinct from those shown in a recent report in which the expression of the Clock, Arntl and Per genes was down-modulated in blood leukocytes after the administration of endotoxin to human volunteers. However, the relationship between these changes and sexual dimorphism was not investigated [45].
Table 3. Functional annotation of female-dependent cluster.
Ontology | Keywords | P-value |
Circadian rhythm (ES : 2.8–14 genes)CLOCK, PER1, PER2, PER3, PTGDS, OPN3, MTNR1A, ARNTL, AFP | ||
GO_BP | Circadian rhythm | 2.9×10−8 |
GO_BP | Rhythmic process | 1.0×10−6 |
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS | Biological rhythms | 2.0×10−6 |
KEGG_PATHWAY | Circadian rhythm | 3.6×10−5 |
INTERPRO | PAS domain | 8.5×10−4 |
Intracellular/Transcription (ES : 2.2–328 genes)SOX9, PBEF1, STX1B1, RNF20, UGT1A2 | ||
GO_CC | Intracellular | 3.5×10−5 |
GO_CC | Membrane-bound organelle | 2.5×10−3 |
GO_CC | Nucleus | 7.3×10−3 |
INTERPRO | Basic helix-loop-helix dimerization region | 2.0×10−3 |
GO_BP | Metabolic process | 2.8×10−4 |
The enrichment score (ES), the number of genes and example genes in each group of genes were indicated.
The circadian rhythm modification associated with C. burnetti infection may affect numerous biological functions. The biological clock controls the secretion of estrogen hormones [46] by regulating the intracellular levels of estrogen receptors α and β [47], [48]. Lower Per2 levels lead to the stabilization of estrogen receptor β. As Per2 is estrogen-inducible, a feedback mechanism may attenuate stimulation by estrogens [48]. Male steroid hormones retroactively play a role in the circadian rhythm at the brain level [49]. Orchidectomy leads to a loss of androgen receptor expression and circadian-specific locomotor activity, both of which are restored by testosterone replacement [49], [50]. Interestingly, circadian rhythm and immune responses are interconnected [51]. For instance, the susceptibility or resistance of flies to infection varies according to the time when they are infected [52]. The circadian oscillation of clock genes affects IFN-γ production through the regulation of Per2 [53] or the activity of natural killer cells [54]. Circadian rhythm may also control the steroid pathway since it post-translationally inhibits glucocorticoid receptors [55]. Cross-talk between these pathways may reinforce the effect of sex on C. burnetii infection. Finally, we hypothesize that an early response involving circadian rhythm likely promotes efficient bacterial elimination in females, while in males, the early phase of the response to C. burnetii infection is inefficient, due at least in part to an anti-inflammatory response that favors bacterial growth [13].
In conclusion, different transcriptional responses to C. burnetii were associated with the severity of the infection in male and female mice. Functional annotation showed that the modulated genes were organized in different networks in males and females and we hypothesize that circadian rhythm may be involved in C. burnetii infection. As the percentage of sex-dependent genes that were modulated by C. burnetii infection was dramatically high, one can expect that numerous genes would be modulated in other infectious diseases described as epidemiologically associated with sexual dimorphism. Our data provide a new basis for elucidating the role of sexual dimorphism in human infections. It would be also interesting to determine if differences in gene expression occur in infectious diseases not described as epidemiologically sex-dependent.
Materials and Methods
Infection of Mice
The following experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Université de la Méditerranée. Forty C57BL/6 mice (20 males and 20 females) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. Ten females and ten males were sterilized at seven weeks of age. Ovaries were removed through bilateral incisions of the lumbar region and testes were removed through bilateral scrotum incision. After three weeks, ten males and ten females, including five non-castrated and five castrated animals of each gender, were killed. The other series of mice were injected intraperitoneally with 105 C. burnetii organisms at the same time and sacrificed at day one after infection [56]. In another set of experiments, 16 mice (4 intact males, 4 castrated males, 4 intact females and 4 castrated females) were killed at zero, one, four and seven days after C. burnetii infection. Organs were aseptically excised. Samples for RNA extraction were stabilized in RNAlater (Qiagen, France). All specimens were stored at −80°C until use.
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as previously described [57]. The primers were designed by Primer3 (v. 0.4.0) available at http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/. Reverse trancriptase was omitted in negative controls. The FC in target gene cDNA relative to endogenous control (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, GAPDH) was determined with the formula: fold change = 2−ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt = (CtTarget−CtGAPDH)infected mice−(CtTarget−CtGAPDH)uninfected mice. Ct values were defined as the cycle number at which fluorescence signals were detected [58].
Microarray procedures and data analysis
Whole Mouse Genome Oligo Microarray 4×44K Kit (44,000 60-mer oligonucleotides) and One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis (Agilent Technologies) were used as recently described [57]. Slides were washed, dried, and scanned at 5-µm resolution with a G2505B DNA microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies). Intensity signals were generated using the Agilent Feature Extractor Software A.9.1.3 after image quality control was performed manually. Four aberrant samples (two infected males, one uninfected male and one uninfected female) were eliminated before starting the analysis because of technical problems. Raw signal data were normalized with the quantile method [59] and then transformed into binary logarithm. The Significance Analysis of Microarrays test (SAM [60]) was used to study the gene expression in intact animals with a multiclass analysis (sex and infection). False Discovery Rate (FDR) was set to 0.05 to filter modulated genes. Then, selected probes (n = 13,814) were filtered using the FC obtained from dividing the median intensity of infected and non-infected mice. FCs of male and female mice were calculated with a cut-off at 1.75 as selection criterium for differentially expressed genes. Thus, the selected genes which were annotated as “sex-specific” were also “infection-specific”. Supervised analyses were carried out with R (R for statistical computation and graphic version 2.7.2, GPL) with the library BioConductor [61]. Functional annotations and classifications were performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resource 2008 [62]. Keywords from the following ontologies were analyzed (GO, SP_PIR_KEYWORDS, UP_SEQ_FEATURE, SMART, INTERPRO, KEGG_PATHWAYS, and BIOCARTA). Gene Ontology (GO) keywords are further classified according to their main category: Biological Process (GO_BP), Cellular Component (GO_CC) or Molecular Function (GO_MF). PCA was used to visually explore global effects for genome wide trends, unexpected effects and outliers in the expression data (library made4 for R [63]). The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus [64] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE21065 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE21065).
Supporting Information
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1.Theobald S, Tolhurst R, Squire SB. Gender, equity: new approaches for effective management of communicable diseases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100:299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546–1554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bird MD, Karavitis J, Kovacs EJ. Sex differences and estrogen modulation of the cellular immune response after injury. Cell Immunol. 2008;252:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Holmes CB, Hausler H, Nunn P. A review of sex differences in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2:96–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jiménez-Corona M, García-García L, DeRiemer K, Ferreyra-Reyes L, Bobadilla-del-Valle M, et al. Gender differentials of pulmonary tuberculosis transmission and reactivation in an endemic area. Thorax. 2006;61:348–353. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.049452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Greig JE, Carnie JA, Tallis GF, Ryan NJ, Tan AG, et al. An outbreak of Legionnaires' disease at the Melbourne Aquarium, April 2000: investigation and case-control studies. Med J Aust. 2004;180:566–572. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hsieh Y, Frink M, Choudhry MA, Bland KI, Chaudry IH. Metabolic modulators following trauma sepsis: sex hormones. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:S621–629. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000278603.18687.4F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Azad AF. Pathogenic rickettsiae as bioterrorism agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:S52–55. doi: 10.1086/518147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pierce CY, Barr JR, Woolfitt AR, Moura H, Shaw EI, et al. Strain and phase identification of the U.S. category B agent Coxiella burnetii by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multivariate pattern recognition. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;583:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.09.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege JL. Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:219–226. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:518–553. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2005;84:162–173. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000165658.82869.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leone M, Honstettre A, Lepidi H, Capo C, Bayard F, et al. Effect of sex on Coxiella burnetii infection: protective role of 17beta-estradiol. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:339–345. doi: 10.1086/380798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Penaloza C, Estevez B, Orlanski S, Sikorska M, Walker R, et al. Sex of the cell dictates its response: differential gene expression and sensitivity to cell death inducing stress in male and female cells. FASEB J. 2009;23:1869–1879. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-119388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Amador-Noguez D, Zimmerman J, Venable S, Darlington G. Gender-specific alterations in gene expression and loss of liver sexual dimorphism in the long-lived Ames dwarf mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;332:1086–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sopena N, Sabrià M. Multicenter study of hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-ICU patients. Chest. 2005;127:213–219. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.1.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yeretssian G, Doiron K, Shao W, Leavitt BR, Hayden MR, et al. Gender differences in expression of the human caspase-12 long variant determines susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9016–9020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813362106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Basant A, Rege M, Sharma S, Sonawat HM. Alterations in urine, serum and brain metabolomic profiles exhibit sexual dimorphism during malaria disease progression. Malar J. 2010;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mokart D, Leone M, Sannini A, Brun JP, Tison A, et al. Predictive perioperative factors for developing severe sepsis after major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:776–781. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moxley G, Posthuma D, Carlson P, Estrada E, Han J, et al. Sexual dimorphism in innate immunity. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:250–258. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200201)46:1<250::AID-ART10064>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marriott I, Bost KL, Huet-Hudson YM. Sexual dimorphism in expression of receptors for bacterial lipopolysaccharides in murine macrophages: a possible mechanism for gender-based differences in endotoxic shock susceptibility. J Reprod Immunol. 2006;71:12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van de Beek D, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M, Reitsma JB, et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1849–1859. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hollm-Delgado M, Allard R, Pilon PA. Invasive group A streptococcal infections, clinical manifestations and their predictors, Montreal, 1995–2001. Emerging Infect Dis. 2005;11:77–82. doi: 10.3201/eid1101.030651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Treister NS, Richards SM, Suzuki T, Jensen RV, Sullivan DA. Influence of androgens on gene expression in the BALB/c mouse submandibular gland. J Dent Res. 2005;84:1187–1192. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Davidoff AM, Ng CYC, Zhou J, Spence Y, Nathwani AC. Sex significantly influences transduction of murine liver by recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors through an androgen-dependent pathway. Blood. 2003;102:480–488. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ceribelli A, Pino MS, Cecere FL. Gender differences: implications for clinical trials and practice. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:S15–18. doi: 10.1097/01.JTO.0000268635.25579.7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paretsky D, Downs CM, Salmon CW. Some biochemical changes in the guinea pig during infection with Coxiella burnetii. J Bacteriol. 1964;88:137–142. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.1.137-142.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Howe D, Heinzen RA. Coxiella burnetii inhabits a cholesterol-rich vacuole and influences cellular cholesterol metabolism. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:496–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Esemuede N, Lee T, Pierre-Paul D, Sumpio BE, Gahtan V. The role of thrombospondin-1 in human disease. J Surg Res. 2004;122:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.He Y, Li H, Zhang J, Hsu C, Lin E, et al. The extracellular matrix protein mindin is a pattern-recognition molecule for microbial pathogens. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:88–97. doi: 10.1038/ni1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Capo C, Lindberg FP, Meconi S, Zaffran Y, Tardei G, et al. Subversion of monocyte functions by Coxiella burnetii: impairment of the cross-talk between αvβ3 integrin and CR3. J Immunol. 1999;163:6078–6085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Froy O. Regulation of mammalian defensin expression by Toll-like receptor-dependent and independent signalling pathways. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1387–1397. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kaiser V, Diamond G. Expression of mammalian defensin genes. J Leukoc Biol. 2000;68:779–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nemeth E, Ganz T. The role of hepcidin in iron metabolism. Acta Haematol. 2009;122:78–86. doi: 10.1159/000243791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Briggs HL, Pul N, Seshadri R, Wilson MJ, Tersteeg C, et al. Limited role for iron regulation in Coxiella burnetii pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2189–2201. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01609-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Courselaud B, Troadec M, Fruchon S, Ilyin G, Borot N, et al. Strain and gender modulate hepatic hepcidin 1 and 2 mRNA expression in mice. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2004;32:283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krijt J, Cmejla R, Sýkora V, Vokurka M, Vyoral D, et al. Different expression pattern of hepcidin genes in the liver and pancreas of C57BL/6N and DBA/2N mice. J Hepatol. 2004;40:891–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meghari S, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege JL. Deficient transendothelial migration of leukocytes in Q fever: the role played by interleukin-10. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:365–369. doi: 10.1086/505227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mege JL, Meghari S, Honstettre A, Capo C, Raoult D. The two faces of interleukin 10 in human infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:557–569. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70577-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ghigo E, Honstettre A, Capo C, Gorvel J, Raoult D, et al. Link between impaired maturation of phagosomes and defective Coxiella burnetii killing in patients with chronic Q fever. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1767–1772. doi: 10.1086/425041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dellacasagrande J, Ghigo E, Raoult D, Capo C, Mege JL. IFN-gamma-induced apoptosis and microbicidal activity in monocytes harboring the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii require membrane TNF and homotypic cell adherence. J Immunol. 2002;169:6309–6315. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kahlke V, Angele MK, Ayala A, Schwacha MG, Cioffi WG, et al. Immune dysfunction following trauma-haemorrhage: influence of gender and age. Cytokine. 2000;12:69–77. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1999.0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Miller BH, McDearmon EL, Panda S, Hayes KR, Zhang J, et al. Circadian and CLOCK-controlled regulation of the mouse transcriptome and cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3342–3347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611724104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Haimovich B, Calvano J, Haimovich AD, Calvano SE, Coyle SM, et al. In vivo endotoxin synchronizes and suppresses clock gene expression in human peripheral blood leukocytes. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:751–758. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cd131c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chappell PE. Clocks and the black box: circadian influences on gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion. J Neuroendocrinol. 2005;17:119–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cai W, Rambaud J, Teboul M, Masse I, Benoit G, et al. Expression levels of estrogen receptor beta are modulated by components of the molecular clock. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:784–793. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00233-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gery S, Virk RK, Chumakov K, Yu A, Koeffler HP. The clock gene Per2 links the circadian system to the estrogen receptor. Oncogene. 2007;26:7916–7920. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Iwahana E, Karatsoreos I, Shibata S, Silver R. Gonadectomy reveals sex differences in circadian rhythms and suprachiasmatic nucleus androgen receptors in mice. Horm Behav. 2008;53:422–430. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Karatsoreos IN, Wang A, Sasanian J, Silver R. A role for androgens in regulating circadian behavior and the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Endocrinology. 2007;148:5487–5495. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Habbal OA, Al-Jabri AA. Circadian rhythm and the immune response: a review. Int Rev Immunol. 2009;28:93–108. doi: 10.1080/08830180802645050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee J, Edery I. Circadian regulation in the ability of Drosophila to combat pathogenic infections. Curr Biol. 2008;18:195–199. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Arjona A, Sarkar DK. The circadian gene mPer2 regulates the daily rhythm of IFN-gamma. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2006;26:645–649. doi: 10.1089/jir.2006.26.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Arjona A, Sarkar DK. Circadian oscillations of clock genes, cytolytic factors, and cytokines in rat NK cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:7618–7624. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nader N, Chrousos GP, Kino T. Circadian rhythm transcription factor CLOCK regulates the transcriptional activity of the glucocorticoid receptor by acetylating its hinge region lysine cluster: potential physiological implications. FASEB J. 2009;23:1572–1583. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-117697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Farbrother P, Wagner C, Na J, Tunggal B, Morio T, et al. Dictyostelium transcriptional host cell response upon infection with Legionella. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:438–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bastonero S, Le Priol Y, Armand M, Bernard CS, Reynaud-Gaubert M, et al. New microbicidal functions of tracheal glands: defective anti-infectious response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA, Mills AG, Gorn V, Singer MJ, et al. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Anal Biochem. 2000;285:194–204. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–93. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5116–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dennis G, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Culhane AC, Thioulouse J, Perrière G, Higgins DG. MADE4: an R package for multivariate analysis of gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2789–2790. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Barrett T, Edgar R. Gene expression omnibus: microarray data storage, submission, retrieval, and analysis. Meth Enzymol. 2006;411:352–369. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11019-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lopez F, Textoris J, Bergon A, Didier G, Remy E, et al. TranscriptomeBrowser: a powerful and flexible toolbox to explore productively the transcriptional landscape of the Gene Expression Omnibus database. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e4001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.