Abstract
We present the crystal structure of an immunoglobulin light-chain-like domain, CTLA-4, as a strand-swapped dimer displaying cis–trans proline isomerisation and native-like hydrogen bonding. We also show that CTLA-4 can form amyloid-like fibres and amorphous deposits explainable by the same strand swapping. Our results suggest a molecular basis for the pathological aggregation of immunoglobulin domains and why amyloid-like fibres are more often composed of homologous rather than heterologous subunits.
Abbreviations used: IgSF, Ig superfamily; TFE, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline
Keywords: CTLA-4, X-ray crystallography, protein aggregation assays, electron microscopy, amyloid
Immunoglobulin (Ig) light-chain protein deposition diseases arise when Ig domains form pathology-inducing aggregates; these can occur in a variety of organs but most frequently in the kidney.1 The molecular nature of the aggregates formed during such disease processes has yet to be determined in detail but two different kinds are known to exist: amyloid-like fibres as found in light-chain amyloidosis and amorphous aggregates as found in light-chain deposition disease.1 In the course of analyzing the structure and interactions of CTLA-4, which is providing important insights into avidity enhancement of regulatory signals at the T-cell surface,2–5 we crystallised and solved the structure of an Escherichia coli-expressed monomeric form of the protein (ecCTLA-4), which unexpectedly formed a misfolded dimer and both amyloid and amorphous aggregates under largely physiological conditions. Our work provides new insights into the stability of immunoglobulin folds and the process by which they form disease-inducing amyloid-like deposits.
A monomeric form of ecCTLA-4, which comprises a canonical Ig superfamily (IgSF) V-set domain, was engineered by mutating the cysteine at position 122, which forms a disulfide between the C-terminal membrane-proximal linker regions of the protein, to a serine. As expected, this construct was expressed as a monomer (see Supplementary Fig. S1), and its crystal structure revealed the characteristic V-set IgSF fold (see Fig. 1a and Table 1). Although only one molecule of CTLA-4 is present in each crystallographic asymmetric unit, an unexpected swapping of the C-terminal β-strands between adjacent ecCTLA-4 molecules results in the formation of an artificial homodimer (compare the topology diagrams in Fig. 1b and c). In Fig. 1d we show an omit map with phase information for the strand-swapped region excluded from the calculation: the 2Fo − Fc map shows clearly the strand-swapped density. The GG′ strands of one domain replace the GG′ strands of a neighbour, and vice versa, forming a compact dimeric unit. A structural comparison with the native, non-strand-swapped crystal structures of B7-complexed CTLA-43 and mammalian-expressed CTLA-4 (maCTLA-4; Yu et al., manuscript in preparation) which forms a quite different disulfide-linked dimer, revealed that cis–trans isomerisation of the prolines at positions 101 and 103 relieves peptide bond strain in ecCTLA-4 seemingly driving the strand swap of the C-terminal β-strands (Fig. 1b and c). In Supplementary Fig. S2, we show a superposition of all four previously determined CTLA-4 crystal structures—three of which describe non-strand-swapped dimers (all additionally ligand bound)2,3,6 and one of which is an unliganded monomer.7 In addition to superposition of the domains themselves, we show a close-up of the triproline loop in which cis–trans isomerisation is present in the ecCTLA-4 structure compared to the others. As well as this reconfiguration, new van der Waals and hydrogenbonding interaction networks between the amino acids forming the (opened) hinging region appear to provide stabilisation energy for the strand-swapped ecCTLA-4 dimer, alongside the formation of the native-like β-strand interactions between the GG′ and F strands.
Table 1.
ecCTLA4 | |
---|---|
Data collection | |
Space group | P3121 |
Cell dimensions | |
a, b, c (Å) | 43.0, 43.0, 140.1 |
α, β, γ (°) | 90, 90, 120 |
Resolution (Å) | 18.6–2.6 |
Rmerge | 3.6 (20.0) |
I/σI | 29.1 (9.0) |
No. of reflections/no. unique | 99,136/4488 |
Completeness (%) | 85.0 (45.8) |
Redundancy | 22.1 (21.3) |
Refinement | |
Resolution (Å) | 18.6–2.6 |
No. of reflections | 4289 |
Rwork/Rfree | 19.2/24.5⁎ |
No. of atoms | |
Protein | 914 |
Water | 50 |
B-factors | |
Protein (main chain) | 26.6 |
Protein (side chain) | 31.1 |
Water | 22.1 |
Overall | 28.4 |
R.M.S.D.s | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.006 |
Bond angles (°) | 1.03 |
Ramachandran plot analysis | |
Outliers | 0.00% |
In allowed regions | 4.31% |
In preferred regions | 95.69% |
The CTLA4 vl-Ig was concentrated to 10 mg/ml in Hepes-buffered saline at pH 7.4 and crystallised in 0.02 M magnesium chloride, 0.1 M Hepes (pH 7.5), 22% (w/v) polyacrylic acid 5100 sodium salt and 0.4 M NDSB-256 (nondetergent sulfobetaine 256, dimethylbenzylammonium propane sulfonate), or with 6% 1,6-diaminohexane. Crystals appeared after 12 h and were frozen in a stream of nitrogen either with perfluorated oil or with 25% glycerol in the mother liquor as cryoprotectant. Data were collected on a MAR345 in-house detector at a wavelength of 1.542 Å. Data were indexed, integrated and scaled with the XDS package21 and the structure was solved by molecular replacement using PHASER22 with monomeric CTLA4 (Protein Data Bank code 1I8L, the structure of CTLA4 from the complex with B7-13). The structure was refined with Refmac5.423 using a maximum likelihood target alternated with manual rebuilding of the structure (⁎4.2% of the reflections have been used for Rfree calculation, i.e., 189 reflections). Parenthetical values are for the highest-resolution shell.
The strand swap seen in our CTLA-4 structure is strikingly similar to that found for CD478 and also that seen for a llama antibody variable heavy chain,9 which was hypothesised to provide a basis for understanding aggregation by Ig domains.1 To investigate the possibility that the strand swapping we observe could underpin additional levels of aggregation, we incubated a concentrated solution of monomeric ecCTLA-4 at room temperature for 24 h, whereupon dimeric and larger oligomeric species formed (Supplementary Fig. S3). This indicates that purified monomeric ecCTLA-4 ectodomain can refold to a relatively stable strand-swapped dimer and also produce larger aggregates. To unravel the structural basis of immunoglobulin domain aggregation, and in particular to investigate the bimodal and concurrent formation of both fibres and amorphous aggregates, we investigated ecCTLA-4 aggregation further.
To assess the amyloid-forming propensity of the monomeric and strand-swapped dimeric forms of CTLA-4, we employed an assay established by Wright et al. in which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) is used to create mildly denaturing conditions and so stimulate aggregation.10 Both the monomeric, refolded protein and the dimeric material produced by overnight incubation formed aggregates, the kinetics of which could be followed by monitoring the fluorescence of the amyloid-specific dye Thioflavin T. This suggests that the higher-order aggregates have an amyloid-type structure (see Fig. 2a). The rate at which aggregation occurred was comparable to that observed for other amyloidogenic proteins.10,11 The aggregates formed were also Congo Red-positive (see Fig. 2b), which is another indicator of amyloid-type structure. In the case of the maCTLA-4 ectodomain retaining its cysteine-containing C-terminus, the C-terminal β-strands of the homodimer appear to be prevented from strand swapping by disulfide bond formation, since this form of the protein exhibited no tendency to form aggregates, even in the presence of TFE (see Fig. 2a). This indicates that a free C-terminus, and thus also a less constrained hinging region, mediates strand swapping and amyloid-type aggregate formation. Furthermore, it implies that a fundamental metastability within the IgSF V-set fold allows strand swapping in soluble forms of CTLA-4 that is likely to be prevented by membrane anchoring and/or disulfide formation in full-length protein or the wild-type ectodomain. Aggregates of ecCTLA-4 could bind Thioflavin T (see Supplementary Fig. S4), but their capacity to do so did not increase upon additional incubation with TFE (see Fig. 2a). Thus ecCTLA-4 monomers seem to become kinetically trapped as strand-swapped dimers that, along with monomers, can then convert to thermodynamically more stable higher-order aggregates, but the aggregates themselves represent a distinct and terminally misfolded form of the protein.
What is the molecular nature of these aggregates? The ultrastructure was visualised by negative stain electron microscopy and is displayed in Fig. 2c. In addition to an apparently amorphous aggregate, individual fibres could be imaged that appear to consist of “beads-on-a-string” type structures similar to those described by Bennett et al.1 This linear, one-dimensional polymerisation would propagate as each monomer forms a strand-accepting surface (the interface that coordinates the GG′ strands in the native domain) by donating its GG′ strands to a neighbour. Consistent with such an arrangement for the CTLA-4 aggregates, circular dichroism (CD) indicates that the secondary structure of the soluble protein and that of the aggregates are very similar (Fig. 2d). The prominent spectral minimum at a wavelength of around 220 nm is characteristic for β-sheet structures and differences in the fine structure of the aggregate scan are indicative of structural rearrangement upon amyloid formation, without a change in the secondary structure. The CD spectrum of the monomer also shows that CTLA-4 was folded prior to crystallisation and that a (partially) unfolded structure, due to the presence of residual unfolding agents for instance, was not responsible for strand swapping.
When calculating the strand-swapping capacity of the IgSF domain as defined by Bennett et al.,1 it becomes clear that the monomer can only interact with two additional protomers and hence can only form a linear arrangement. As seen for sickle cell haemoglobin,12 the cross-β-spine of archetypal amyloid fibrils is not essential for producing large fibres that may be involved in disease manifestation, and structures with native-like folds can lead to disease phenotypes; the native fold would also be preserved in a bead-like arrangement of the CTLA-4 V-set domains in fibres, as shown schematically in Fig. 3. Similar strand swapping mediates a family of diseases known as serpinopathies in which non-amyloid-type fibres are formed.1
Domain swapping of the type we have observed provides an explanation for the observation made by Wright et al. that immunoglobulin domains of similar sequence aggregate much faster and to a greater extent into amyloid-like structures than domains of dissimilar sequence: swapping β-strands of dissimilar sequences would effect imperfect structural complementation and decreased stability.10 Our observations also support the proposal1 that domain swapping could be the molecular basis for the formation of both fibrils and aggregates in the same disease, especially when different kinds of deposits arise from the same protein. In certain lymphoproliferative disorders, immunoglobulin domains are overproduced, resulting in amorphous and fibrillar aggregates. A soluble splice-variant form of CTLA-4 that lacks the transmembrane region and membrane-proximal linker has been identified in vivo, being most abundant in bone marrow, blood and lymph nodes.13 This naturally soluble form of CTLA-4 formed dimeric species with apparently comparable stability to that of the dimer described here, as well as some higher molecular weight aggregates. In patients with autoimmune thyroid disease, the levels of expression of soluble CTLA-4 are as much as 7- to 20-fold greater than in normal individuals;14 furthermore, individuals suffering from myasthenia gravis,15 systemic lupus erythematosus16 and systemic sclerosis17 also show elevated soluble CTLA-4 expression. Indeed, in systemic sclerosis the level of CTLA-4 expression appears linked to adverse progression, and aggregated protein deposits are associated with pathology.17
It is noteworthy that the two-β-sheet DEBA–GFCC′C″ topology characteristic of IgSF domains appears independently in cytokine receptors, fibronectin, cadherins, transcription factors and bacterial cytosolic domains, indicating that it is among the most successful folding topologies. In spite of this, there are now four examples of IgSF domains exhibiting intrinsic metastability: CTLA-4, CD47, the llama antibody heavy chain and CD2.8,9,18 In the case of the CD2 dimer, a much more dramatic rearrangement is observed, in which the A, B, C and C′ strands of one polypeptide combine with the D, E, F and G strands of the other. It seems that the evolution of these proteins accommodated a trade-off between facile folding and potentially disease-causing metastability.
Protein Data Bank accession code
Coordinates and structure factors for the ecCTLA-4 strand-swapped dimer have been deposited with Protein Data Bank accession code 2x44.
Acknowledgements
We thank Karl Harlos and Erika Mancini for help with X-ray crystallography data collection and structure solution. This research was supported by the Wellcome Trust. A.F.-P.S. was a Wellcome Trust 4-Year DPhil student and holds a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship. R.J.C.G is a Royal Society University Research Fellow, D.I.S. is an MRC Research Professor and S.J.D is a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow.
Edited by I. Wilson
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.011
Contributor Information
Andreas F.-P. Sonnen, Email: andreas@strubi.ox.ac.uk.
Robert J.C. Gilbert, Email: gilbert@strubi.ox.ac.uk.
Appendix A.
References
- 1.Bennett M.J., Sawaya M.R., Eisenberg D. Deposition diseases and 3D domain swapping. Structure. 2006;14:811–824. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schwartz J.C., Zhang X., Fedorov A.A., Nathenson S.G., Almo S.C. Structural basis for co-stimulation by the human CTLA-4/B7-2 complex. Nature. 2001;410:604–608. doi: 10.1038/35069112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stamper C.C., Zhang Y., Tobin J.F., Erbe D.V., Ikemizu S., Davis S.J. Crystal structure of the B7-1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses. Nature. 2001;410:608–611. doi: 10.1038/35069118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Evans E.J., Esnouf R.M., Manso-Sancho R., Gilbert R.J.C., James J.R., Yu C. Crystal structure of a soluble CD28–Fab complex. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:271–279. doi: 10.1038/ni1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davis S.J., van der Merwe P.A. The kinetic segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 2006;7:803–809. doi: 10.1038/ni1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schoenfeld D., Matschiner G., Chartwell L., Trentmann S., Gille H., Huelsmeyer M. An engineered lipocalin specific for CTLA-4 reveals a combining site with structural and conformational features similar to antibodies. Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:8198–8203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813399106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ostrov D.A., Shi W., Schwartz J.C., Almo S.C., Nathenson S.G. Structure of murine CTLA-4 and its role in modulating T cell responsiveness. Science. 2000;290:816–819. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hatherley D., Graham S.C., Turner J., Harlos K., Stuart D.I., Barclay A.N. Paired receptor specificity explained by structures of signal receptor proteins alone and complexed with CD47. Mol. Cell. 2008;31:266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spinelli S., Desmyter A., Frenken L., Verrips T., Tegoni M, Cambillau C. Domain swapping of a llama VHH domain builds a crystal-wide beta-sheet structure. FEBS Lett. 2004;564:35–40. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00304-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wright C.F., Teichmann S.A., Clarke J., Dobson C.M. The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins. Nature. 2005;438:878–881. doi: 10.1038/nature04195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Padrick S.B., Miranker A.D. Islet amyloid: phase partitioning and secondary nucleation are central to the mechanism of fibrillogenesis. Biochemistry. 2002;41:4694–6703. doi: 10.1021/bi0160462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Galkin O., Pan W., Filobelo L., Hirsch R.E., Nagel R.L., Vekilov P.G. Two-step mechanism of homogeneous nucleation of sickle cell hemoglobin polymers. Biophys. J. 2007;93:902–913. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.103705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oaks M.K., Hallett K.M., Penwell R.T., Stauber E.C., Warren S.J., Tector A.J. A native soluble form of CTLA-4. Cell. Immunol. 2000;201:144–153. doi: 10.1006/cimm.2000.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oaks M.K., Hallett K.M. Cutting edge: a soluble form of CTLA-4 in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. J. Immunol. 2000;164:5015–5018. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.5015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang X.B., Kakoulidou M., Giscombe R., Qiu Q., Huang D., Pirskanen R., Lefvert A.K. Abnormal expression of CTLA-4 by T cells from patients with myasthenia gravis: effect of an AT-rich gene sequence. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002;130:224–232. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00228-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu M.F., Wang C.R., Chen P.C., Fung L.L. Increased expression of soluble cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 molecule in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand. J. Immunol. 2003;57:568–572. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sato S., Fujimoto M., Hasegawa M., Komura K., Yanaba K., Hayakawa I. Serum soluble CTL:A-4 levels are increased in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:1261–1266. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murray A.J., Lewis S.J., Barclay A.N., Brady R.L. One sequence, two folds: a metastable structure of CD2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:7337–7341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.16.7337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cox G.N., Pratt D., Smith D., McDermott M.J., Vanderslice R.W. Refolding and characterisation of recombinant human CTLA-4 expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 1999;17:26–32. doi: 10.1006/prep.1999.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chiti F., Webster P., Taddei N., Clark A., Stefani M., Ramponia G., Dobson C.M. Designing conditions or in vitro formation of amyloid protofilaments and fibrils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:3590–3594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kabsch W. Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:795–800. [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCoy A.J. Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 2007;63:32–41. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906045975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Winn M.D., Murshudov G.N., Papiz M.Z. Macomolecular TLS refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions. Methods Enzymol. 2003;374:300–321. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)74014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.