Abstract
Background
In order to improve our understanding of the molecular pathways that mediate tumor proliferation and angiogenesis, and to evaluate the biological response to anti-angiogenic therapy, we analyzed the changes in the protein profile of glioblastoma in response to treatment with recombinant human Platelet Factor 4-DLR mutated protein (PF4-DLR), an inhibitor of angiogenesis.
Methodology/Principal Findings
U87-derived experimental glioblastomas were grown in the brain of xenografted nude mice, treated with PF4-DLR, and processed for proteomic analysis. More than fifty proteins were differentially expressed in response to PF4-DLR treatment. Among them, integrin-linked kinase 1 (ILK1) signaling pathway was first down-regulated but then up-regulated after treatment for prolonged period. The activity of PF4-DLR can be increased by simultaneously treating mice orthotopically implanted with glioblastomas, with ILK1-specific siRNA. As ILK1 is related to malignant progression and a poor prognosis in various types of tumors, we measured ILK1 expression in human glioblatomas, astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, and found that it varied widely; however, a high level of ILK1 expression was correlated to a poor prognosis.
Conclusions/Significance
Our results suggest that identifying the molecular pathways induced by anti-angiogenic therapies may help the development of combinaatorial treatment strategies that increase the therapeutic efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors by association with specific agents that disrupt signaling in tumor cells.
Introduction
The dependence of tumor growth and metastasis on angiogenesis provides a powerful rationale for anti-angiogenic approaches for the treatment of glioblastoma and other solid tumors. Targeting blood vessels in brain tumors is a particularly attractive strategy, given their characteristic high degree of endothelial proliferation, vascular permeability, and expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors, [e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] [1], [2], [3], [4].
In the case of glioblastomas, anti-angiogenic agents have been used in combination with chemotherapy but, after a certain amount of time, tumor growth resumes. It has recently been suggested that cells evade anti-angiogenic therapies by up-regulating alternative signaling circuits [5]. It is therefore useful to identify pathways that are associated with tumor angiogenesis and the response to anti-angiogenic therapy. This may help in developing new specific combinatorial therapeutic strategies.
We used a proteomic approach to investigate the “proteome response” to the treatment of experimental glioblastomas with anti-angiogenic drugs. We used Platelet Factor 4-DLR (PF4-DLR), a peptide derived by inserting DLR mutations on a PF4 47–70aa fragment from Platelet Factor 4 that potently inhibits angiogenesis [6].
Platelet Factor-4-DLR inhibits the binding of iodinated VEGF or FGF-2 to cell surface receptors at much lower concentrations than the unmodified peptide, and abrogates VEGF or FGF-2-induced endothelial cell proliferation [6]. This inhibitor has been widely used in human glioblastoma models, in which it significantly inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth. However, depending on the dose used and the tumors stage at which it is administered, prolonged treatment with PF4-DLR alone or in combination leads to the development of drug resistance [7].
Receptors and intracellular kinases are involved in cancer progression, metastatic spread and the development of resistance to pharmacological treatments [8]. Integrin-linked kinase 1(ILK1) is a protein dependent kinase that regulates Akt activity [9] in a PI3K-dependent manner [10]. It is an important regulator of tumor proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis because it increases VEGF expression by stimulating HIF-1α via AKT phosphorylation on Ser473 [11]. It also promotes cell growth [12] and cell cycle progression [13], and inhibits apoptosis [14]. Recent studies have demonstrated that ILK1 is involved in glioblastoma progression [15] and radioresistance [16].
We found that ILK1 expression is down-regulated after ten days treatment and up-regulated after twenty days. Interestingly treatment with PF4-DLR and an anti-ILK1 short interfering RNA is associated with a decrease in tumor mass and a reduction in the number of tumor vessels.
Our findings have important therapeutic implications and suggest that combination strategies that simultaneously inhibit different mechanisms of tumor proliferation and angiogenesis may significantly increase therapeutic efficacy. We also analyzed the levels of ILK1 in patients with glioblastomas, astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, and found that high levels of ILK1 expression correlate with a poor prognosis. Our data suggest that ILK1 could represent a new specific pharmacological target to be inhibited alone or in combination with anti-angiogenic therapies in gliomas.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Animals were used in accordance with protocols approved by the Italian Minister for Scientific Research, protocol number 11/07, approved on February 28, 2007. Brain tumor tissue was obtained following written informed consent, approved by our Internal Ethical Committee (Neurosurgery, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano).
Cell cultures
The human glioma cell line U87-MG (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was used in the animal experiments. The cells were cultured in αMEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% FBS, and 1000 units/ml gentamycin solution, maintained in T-25 tissue culture flasks in 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C in a humidified incubator. For the intracranial implantation experiments, U87-MG cells were dispersed with a 0.05% solution of trypsin/EDTA (Life Technologies), reaction was stopped with FBS. The cells were washed with PBS, and adjusted to a final concentration of 5×104 cells/10 µl in PBS.
Animal experiments
For the intracranial glioblastoma model, groups of ten 6-week-old nude mice (Charles Rivers Italia, Calco, Italy) were intracranically implanted with 50,000 human U87 glioma cells using an open window technique [17]. Twelve days after tumor cell injection (when an already well established and angiogenic tumor had developed), the animals were implanted subcutaneously with 2004 Alzet osmotic minipumps (ALZET, Cupertino, CA). The pump reservoir was filled with 0.5 mg of the peptide in PBS. The control groups received pumps containing PBS. The first group of animals was sacrificed 10 days after pump implantation, and the second group was sacrificed 20 days after pump implantation (see Table S1).
To investigate the effect of combined treatment with PF4-DLR and an anti-ILK1 small interference RNA, groups of 6-week-old nude mice were implanted intracranically with 50,000 human U87-MG glioblastoma cells (see above) and, twelve days after tumor cells injection, they were divided into three groups: one group was implanted with osmotic minipumps filled with 0.5 mg of PF4-DLR in PBS, and the animals were sacrificed 20 days after pump implantation; a second group was first implanted with pumps filled with 0.5 mg of PF4-DLR in PBS and, 10 days after the beginning of treatment with PF4-DLR ILK1-siRNA was administered intrathecally with a minipump, filled with 0.2 mg of siRNA in PBS,connected via a brain-infusion cannula stereotaxically placed and the combined treatment was continued for 10 days before the mice were sacrificed; finally the control group was implanted with pumps containing PBS and sacrificed 20 days after pump implantation (see Table S2).
At the time of sacrifice, fresh dissected brains were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. All of the animal experiments were repeated at least three times.
Sample preparation for 2D-PAGE and gel analysis
All of the tissues were mechanically lysed at 4°C in CHAPS buffer [CHAPS 4%, 5 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 0.05% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)] using a glass potter, and the samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C in order to eliminate aggregates and debris and then stored at −20°C. The protein concentrations in each sample were measured by means of a DC Bio-Rad assay. A total of 900 µg of proteins from each sample was precipitated with cold acetone and resuspended in thiourea buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea 2% CHAPS, 2% ASB-14, 5% glycerol, 40 mM DTT, 4 mM TCEP, 1% 3–10 IPG buffer, Amersham), and the samples were mixed overnight at 4°C in the dark and clarified by centrifugation at 16000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was first separated by isoelectric focusing over a pH range of 3–10 using precast first-dimension drystrip 3–10 NL 18 cm (Amersham) following a multi-step protocol for 90,000 Vht (Protean IEF cell, Biorad). The first-dimension strip was equilibrated in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 30% glycerol, 2% SDS plus 16 mM DTT for 20 minutes, and then plus 25 mM iodioacetamide for 15 minutes, and loaded on a large format (22×22 cm) 9–16% acrylamide gel to separate the proteins by molecular weight. Second-dimension runs were performed using Biorad XL cells at 30 V 1 h, 300 V 4 h at a constant temperature of 18°C. Protein spots were revealed using home-made blue Coomassie staining, and the gel images were acquired by means of an Image scanner at 300 DPI resolution and analyzed using Image2D Master Platinum software (both from Amersham). At least seven gels per condition were included in the analysis.
Normalized spot volume values were studied using SPSS software version 13.0 for statistical analysis (SPSS Inc.). In brief, the data for each spot match set were analyzed using a box-plot test in order to eliminate outliers, a K-S test to check normal distribution, an F test to analyze the variance, and finally Student's t test to compare the mean values, which were considered significant when p<0.05.
Trypsin digests of protein spots and MALDI-TOF-MS
Protein spots of interest were excised from the gels, reduced, alkylated, and digested overnight with bovine trypsin (Roche Diagnostic), as previously described [18], and a 1 µl aliquot of the supernatant underwent mass analysis using the dried droplet technique and a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as matrix; the mass spectra were obtained using a MALDI–TOF Voyager- DE STR mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). Alternatively, gel fragments were further extracted and the resulting peptide mixture underwent a single desalting/concentration step before mass spectrometric analysis over mZipTipC18 (Millipore Corporation).
The spectra were internally calibrated using trypsin autolysis products, and processed using Data Explorer software. The proteins were unambiguously identified by searching against a comprehensive non-redundant protein database using the Pro-Found and
MASCOT programs [19]; one missed cleavage per peptide was allowed, and an initial mass tolerance of 50 ppm was used in all searches.
Western blot analysis and antibodies
For Western blot analysis, 700 µg of proteins from each sample were precipitated twice in cold acetone 80% and 0.2 mM DTT for 30 minutes at 16,000 g and 4°C. The protein pellets were resupended in 150 µl of Laemmli's buffer, and 10 µl were loaded onto 6–12% SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Sigma) at 80 V for 120 minutes at 4°C. Primary antibodies were applied overnight in blocking buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, and 3% dried non-fat milk). Antibodies against caspase 3 precursor, HSP90, PKC, ILK1, pAKT, AKT, VEGFR and EGFR (Cell Signaling), peEF2, eEF2 and eEF2 kinase (gifts from A. Nairm.), vinculin, tubulin and actin (Sigma), and the secondary antibodies (HRP-conjugated anti-mouse, anti-rabbit or anti-goat) (Amersham) were used in a ratio of 1∶2000. The signal was detected by an ECL detection system (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Emeryville, CA), captured by means of a Versadoc 1000 digital camera (Biorad), and quantified using ImageQuant software (Bio-Rad).
siRNA knockdown
The silencing ILK1 RNA stabilized oligonucleotides (siRNA: sense GCACCAAUUUCGUCGUGGAUU; antisense 5′-pUCCACGACGAAAUUGGUGCUU) were purchased from Dharmacon, and were used with a 21-bp non-silencing control sequence. For the in vitro study, U87-MG cells were transfected with lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Frederick, MD) following the manufacturer's instructions using 50 and 100 mM non-silencing or siRNA with 6 µl LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent for 400,000 cells. All of the experiments were performed 48 hours after transfection, and proliferation was assayed 96 hours after transfection. ON TARGET-plus siRNAs for ILK1 siRNA (sense GCACCAAUUUCGUCGUGGAUU; antisense 5′pUCCACGACGAAAUUGGUGCUU) or siNTC (Dharmacon) were used for the in vivo study. The siRNAs were administered at a concentration of 0.4 mg/kg/day in PBS.
Proliferation assay
This assay was used to test the biological activity of human ILK1 siRNA on U87-MG cell proliferation. U87-MG cells were plated on a 96-well plate (20,000cells/well) and cultured in the presence of ILK1 siRNA (50 or 100 mM) and 10% serum for 24, 48 and 96 hours. The relative number of cells was calculated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide conversion assay (MTT test) (Promega, Madison, WI).
Production of recombinant human PF4-DLR
The COOH-terminal peptide of human PF-4-DLR (PF-4 47–70DLR: NGRKICL-DLRAPLYKKIIKKLLES) was synthesised on a peptide synthesizer using standard Merrifield solid-phase synthesis protocols and t-butoxycarbonyl chemistry, and analysed by means of reverse- phase HPLC chromatography. The peptides used for the biological assays were further purified by dialysis using Spectrapor 500 MW-cut-off membranes or by means of reverse-phase purification using CI8 Sep-Pak cartridges. The identity of the peptides was verified using MALDI-TOF-MS.
Histology, immunofluorescence and immunochemistry
For the histology studies, 10 µm sections of brains removed from treated and untreated mice were fixed with methanol 100% and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Bio-Optica). Images were acquired using a StemiDV4 microscope equipped with a AxioCam ICc 1 camera (Zeiss). Tumor volume were measured by the ellipsoid formula [(width2×length)/2]. Between-group differences in tumor growth were analyzed using the ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test, with p values of <0.05 being considered statistically significant.
For the immunofluorescence studies, 10 µm sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 4% sucrose at room temperature for 10 minutes. The primary and secondary antibodies were applied in Gelatin Detergent Buffer (GDB) buffer (30 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.2% gelatin, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.8 M NaCl). The samples were stained using antibodies against rat anti-mouse CD31 (1∶50, B&D, Pharmigen, San Jose, CA). The secondary antibody used was anti-rat Cy3-conjugated (Jacson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). All of the sections were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma). The fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal LSM510 Zeiss (gift from Monzino Foundation) with a Zeiss 20x objective. All of the measurements were made using Metamorph image analysis software (Universal Imaging Corporation), and were expressed as mean values ± standard error mean (SEM).
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with the Vectastain ABC system (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). In brief, 10 µm sections were air dried and methanol fixed; endogenous peroxidase were blocked with 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 30 minutes; primary antibodies against rat anti-mouse CD31 (1∶50, B&D, Pharmigen, San Jose, CA) or rabbit anti-human ILK1 antigens (1∶50 Cell Signaling) were applied in GDB buffer for 2 hours at room temperature. Secondary antibodies conjugated with biotin were applied in GDB buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. The slices were then incubated with ABC reagent for 30 minutes at room temperature and subsequently treated with DAB until brown staining appearance. Finally, the sections were stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol and mounted with glass coverslips. The image were visualized with a Leica microscope equipped with 10x and 20x objectives and images were acquired using an AxioCam ICc 1 camera (Zeiss).
Tissue samples
The tumor tissues came from patients with astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas or glioblastomas, diagnosed on the basis of the latest WHO classification of gliomas, and were obtained at the time of surgery and stored in nitrogen vapor. Tissues were prepared for Western Blot analysis as described before.
For the immunohistochemistry tissues from patients with different types of tumors were analyzed by the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). All of the specimens were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. Three 5 µm thick sections were cut from each block. The paraffin sections were deparaffined in xylene and antigen was retrieved using sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) in a microwave oven three times for five minutes each time. The sections were stained for immunohistochemical analysis with the primary anti-mouse ILK1 antibody (see above).
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as means with standard errors of the mean (SEM). The significance of differences was tested by unpaired Student t test (two means) or ANOVA with post hoc Tuckey test (more than two means). The SPSS statistical package version 13.0 (SPSS Inc.) was used for the analyses.
Results
Proteomic analysis of experimental glioblastoma treated with PF4-DLR
In order to identify the changes in protein expression induced by PF4-DLR treatment, nude mice bearing U87-MG glioblastoma xenografts were treated using osmotic minipumps that released 0.5 mg/kg/day of peptide. Pumps were implanted 12 days after tumor cells implantation. Animals were sacrificed for the proteomic analysis 10 and 20 days later.
Two-dimensional SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-SDS-PAGE) was used to compare protein expression patterns in treated and untreated tumors of the same age.
At least seven independent gels were used for matching in each group, and a total of more than 1800 protein spots were analyzed (Figures 1A–B and Figure S1A–B show typical 2D gels). The gels included in the analysis were chosen on the basis of comparable total spot numbers, and percentages and distribution parameters as detected by the Image2D Master Platinum software (Amersham).
In tumors treated with PF4-DLR for 10 days, 24 proteins were differentially expressed (p<0.05) in response to the treatment. Of these, 14 were up-regulated and 10 down-regulated (Figure 1A, Table 1 and Figure S2). A set of proteins that correlate with the inhibition of tumor growth in the response to therapy included transforming growth factor-β induced (TGFBI), annexin A1 and protein disulfide-isomerase, which were increased. Another set of proteins involved in cell proliferation was also increased after 10 days of treatment. These include serotransferrin precursor, bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein, elongation factor 1, vinculin and septin 5 (see Table 1 and Figure S2).
Table 1. DLR 10 days.
Swiss prot TrEMBL Acc No | Protein name | Spot No | Mw | pI | DLR/Ctr | Peptides matched | Sequence coverage |
Q15063 | Serotransferrin precursor | 1 | 76.7 | 6.94 | 1.6 (p<0.05) | 35/24 | 36.4% |
P31939 | Bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein | 2 | 64.6 | 6.27 | 1.9 (p<0.05) | 4/4 | 8.4% |
O08553 | Dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 2 | 3 | 61.1 | 5.95 | 0.4 (p<0.001) | 20/12 | 28.8% |
P30101 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 precursor | 4 | 56.7 | 5.98 | 2.0 (p<0.05 | 21/15 | 33.7% |
Q9D1A2 | Cytosolic nonspecific dipeptidase | 5 | 52.7 | 5.43 | 0.6 (p<0.05) | 8/8 | 17.0% |
P06733 | Alpha-enolase | 6 | 47.0 | 7.01 | 1.9 (p<0.05) | 16/7 | 22.6% |
P26641 | Elongation factor 1-gamma | 7 | 50.0 | 6.25 | 2.3 (p<0.05) | 15/10 | 24.5% |
Q04447 | Creatine kinase B-type | 8 | 42.7 | 5.40 | 0.4 (p<0.005) | 30/10 | 34.9% |
P15105 | Glutamine synthetase | 9 | 42.0 | 6.47 | 0.6 (p<0.005) | 11/7 | 25.3% |
P05201 | Aspartate aminotransferase | 10 | 46.1 | 6.68 | 0.6 (p<0.05) | 17/11 | 30.6% |
P04083 | Annexin A1 | 11 | 38.6 | 6.57 | 2.0 (p<0.005) | 24/17 | 46.4% |
P14152 | Malate dehydrogenase | 12 | 36.3 | 6.16 | 0.5 (p<0.005) | 22/7 | 29.7% |
P53810 | Phosphatidylinositol transfer protein alpha | 13 | 31.7 | 5.97 | 0.7 (p<0.05) | 12/6 | 28.9% |
Q9R1P0 | Proteasome subunit alpha type 4 | 14 | 29.4 | 7.58 | 1.9 (p<0.05) | 3/3 | 10.3% |
P60174 | Triosephosphate isomerase | 15 | 26.5 | 6.45 | 1.7 (p<0.005) | 23/10 | 41.1 |
P00558 | Phosphoglycerate kinase | 16 | 44.5 | 8.30 | 0.6 (p<0.005) | 7/7 | 25.0% |
Q9Z2Q6 | Septin-5 | 17 | 42.7 | 6.21 | 0.7 (p<0.05) | 4/4 | 13.8 |
P18206 | Vinculin | 18 | 123.6 | 5.50 | 1.6 (p<0.05) | 20/20 | 22.7 |
Q15582 | Transforming growth factor-beta-induced | 19 | 74.6 | 7.62 | 2.2 (p<0.05) | 9/8 | 13.8% |
Q16658 | Fascin | 20 | 54.4 | 6.84 | 2.4 (p<0.005) | 9/9 | 20.1% |
Q9CZU6 | Citrate synthase | 21 | 51.7 | 8.72 | 2.4 (p<0.05) | 5/5 | 12.7% |
P19157 | Glutathione S-transferase P 1 | 22 | 23.5 | 7.69 | 0.4 (p<0.05) | 6/5 | 32.1% |
P62334 | 26S protease regulatory subunit S10B | 23 | 44.1 | 7.09 | 1.8 (p<0.001) | 7/7 | 20.8% |
P60174 | Proteasome subunit alpha type 6 | 24 | 26.5 | 6.45 | 1.7 (p<0.005) | 19/10 | 43.1% |
List of differentially expressed proteins identified by MALDI-TOF after two- dimensional PAGE analysis of glioblastomas treated with PF4-DLR for ten days or left untreated. The experimental MW and pI are indicated for each protein.
Tumors treated with PF4-DLR for 20 days showed 30 differentially expressed proteins (p<0.05). Twenty four were up-regulated and 6 down-regulated in treated tumors (Figure 1B, Table 2 and Figure S3). Among these proteins, integrin-linked kinase 1 (ILK1), stress-inducible protein 1 (STI1), eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2), vinculin, fascin, pyruvate kinase M2, transketolase, moesin, and the plasminogen precursor were found (see Table 2 and Figure S3).
Table 2. DLR 20 days.
Swiss prot TrEMBL Acc No | Protein name | Spot No | Mw | pI | DLR/Ctr | Peptides matched | Sequencecoverage |
P13639 | Elongation factor 2 | 25 | 95.3 | 6.41 | 1.8 (p<0.05) | 72/28 | 33% |
P02545 | Lamin A/C | 26 | 74.1 | 6.57 | 1.4 (p<0.01) | 13/13 | 20% |
P06396 | Gelsolin precursor | 27 | 85.7 | 5.90 | 1.7 (p<0.001) | 3/2 | 3% |
P41250 | Glycyl-tRNA synthetase | 28 | 83.1 | 6.61 | 1.5 (p<0.05) | 13/9 | 11% |
P02545 | Lamin A/C | 29 | 74.1 | 6.57 | 1.6 (p<0.001) | 17/14 | 22% |
P02545 | Lamin A/C | 30 | 74.1 | 6.57 | 1.4 (p<0.001) | 29/21 | 31% |
P02545 | Lamin A/C | 31 | 74.1 | 6.57 | 1.9 (p<0.001) | 22/17 | 30% |
P18206 | Vinculin | 32 | 123.8 | 5.50 | 2.5 (p<0.001) | 55/30 | 31% |
P14618 | Pyruvate kinase | 33 | 58.0 | 7.96 | 1.5 (p<0.01) | 16/11 | 23% |
Q13418 | Integrin-linked protein kinase | 34 | 51.4 | 8.30 | 2.0 (p<0.05) | 2/2 | 5% |
P61158 | Actin-like protein 3 | 35 | 47.4 | 5.61 | 1.4 (p<0.05) | 16/12 | 38% |
P17174 | Aspartate aminotransferase | 36 | 46.2 | 5.53 | 1.7 (p<0.05) | 29/12 | 29% |
P04406 | GAPDH | 37 | 36.0 | 8.57 | 0.6 (p<0.01) | 13/5 | 23% |
P21796 | hVDAC-1 | 38 | 30.1 | 8.62 | 0.6 (p<0.05) | 8/7 | 30% |
P09651 | hnRNP A1 | 39 | 38.8 | 9.26 | 2.3 (p<0.005) | 5/4 | 13% |
Q00623 | Apolipoprotein A-I precursor | 40 | 30.6 | 5.64 | 1.6 (p<0.05) | 26/9 | 33% |
P61106 | Ras-related protein Rab-14 | 41 | 23.4 | 5.85 | 0.6 (p<0.05) | 11/10 | 44% |
P26038 | Moesin | 42 | 67.8 | 6.08 | 2.7 (p<0.01) | 62/25 | 30% |
P29401 | Transketolase | 43 | 67.9 | 7.58 | 1.8 (p<0.05) | 56/16 | 27% |
P12268 | Inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 | 44 | 55.8 | 6.44 | 2.0 (p<0.005) | 21/10 | 23% |
Q16658 | Fascin | 45 | 54.5 | 6.84 | 1.8 (p<0.05) | 5/5 | 8% |
P26641 | Elongation Factor 1-gamma | 46 | 50.1 | 6.25 | 1.9 (p<0.05) | 27/11 | 17% |
P09493 | Tropomyosin alpha-1 chain | 47 | 32.7 | 4.69 | 1.5 (p<0.05) | 13/11 | 33% |
P42574 | Caspase-3 precursor | 48 | 31.6 | 6.09 | 0.5 (p<0.05) | 4/2 | 11% |
P20918 | Plasminogen precursor NB | 49 | 90.8 | 6.21 | 1.4 (p<0.05) | 7/6 | 7% |
P31948 | Stress-induced.phosphoprotein 1 | 50 | 62.6 | 6.40 | 1.8 (p<0.05) | 24/13 | 27% |
P23526 | Adenosylhomocysteinase | 51 | 47.7 | 5.92 | 1.6 (p<0.05) | 35/15 | 33% |
P49411 | Elongation Factor Tu | 52 | 49.5 | 7.26 | 2.0 (p<0.001) | 2/2 | 5% |
P61160 | Actin-like protein 2 | 53 | 44.8 | 6.29 | 0.7 (p<0.05) | 7/4 | 12% |
P13634 | Carbonic anhydrase | 54 | 28.3 | 6.44 | 0.5 (p<0.01) | 4/4 | 24% |
List of differentially expressed proteins identified by MALDI-TOF after two dimensional PAGE analysis of glioblastomas treated with PF4-DLR for 20 days or left untreated. The experimental MW and pI are indicated for each protein.
Confirmation of protein expression changes by Western blotting
As part of validation of the proteomic analysis, the expression of some of the identified proteins was tested by immunoblotting using protein extracts from glioblastomas treated with PF4-DLR for 10 and 20 days. As expected, caspase 3 was decreased after 20 days of PF4-DLR treatment when compared to untreated tumors (Figure 2A and 2B), in agreement with the proteomic analysis. Immunoblotting not only confirmed the up-regulation of ILK1 in tumors treated with PF4-DLR for 20 days, but also revealed a significant decrease in ILK1 levels after 10 days of treatment in comparison to untreated tumors (Figure 2A and 2B).
2D gels showed three spots corresponding presumably to eEF2 protein with the same molecular weight but with different pI values. The treated tumors showed a significant increase in the more acidic spots. This may be due to a post-translational modification such as protein phosphorylation. We therefore analyzed the phosphorylation level of eEF2 using anti-phospho-eEF2 and total eEF2 antibodies. As shown in Figure 2A and 2B, eEF2 phosphorylation was significantly reduced after 10 days of PF4-DLR treatment, but also significantly increased after 20 days. In addition, we investigated the expression of eEF2 kinase and found a significant increase after 20 days.
Finally, immunoblotting confirmed the increase in expression of vinculin in mice treated for 20 days (Figure 2A and 2B).
PF4-DLR specifically induces ILK1 pathway activation
Among the identified proteins, we decided to concentrate on ILK1. The kinase activity of ILK1 is stimulated by growth factors and chemokines in a PI3 kinase-dependent manner [10]. ILK1 can also mediate the phosphorylation of a variety of intracellular substrates, particularly protein kinase B/Akt on serine-473 [20]. We therefore, tested the levels of AKT phosphorylation in tumors treated with PF4-DLR. As expected, AKT phosphorylation was decreased after 10 days of treatment and increased after 20 days (Figures 3A and 3B).
It has been shown that growth factors receptor expression correlates with ILK1 expression [21]. We therefore analyzed the levels of EGFR by immunoblotting: similar to ILK1 and pAKT expression of EGFR was reduced after 10 days of PF4-DLR treatment and increased after 20 days (Figures 3A and 3B). On the contrary, VEGFR2 was down-regulated by PF4-DLR after both 10 and 20 days of treatment (Figure 3A and 3B).
This may indicate that PF4-DLR, after 10 days of treatment, is decreasing ILK1 levels by down-regulating EGFR. On the contrary, longer treatment (20 days), led to an increase in ILK1 levels, and of down-stream pathways.
ILK1 knockdown in glioblastoma cells increases PF4-DLR activity
We next performed knocked down experiments using specific ILK1 siRNA and analyzed its consequences on glioma cell proliferation and tumor development in vitro and in vivo. The ability of ILK1-siRNA to reduce the expression of ILK1 protein was first tested in U87-MG cells in vitro. Both 50 and 100 nM ILK1 siRNA reduced ILK1 protein expression (NT: 100%; scrambled 50 nM: 96.6%; scrambled 100 nM: 94.9%; siRNA ILK1 50 nM: 50.0%; siRNA ILK1 100 nM: 41.3%) (Figure 4A). We next measured U87 –MG proliferation. As expected ILK1 siRNA reduces cell proliferation (NT: 100%; scrambled 100 nM: 90.0%; siRNA ILK1 50 nM: 52.0; siRNA ILK1 100 nM: 47.2) to about 50% when incubated for 48 hours in comparison with cells transfected with scrambled control siRNA (Figure 4B).
We then tested whether the inhibitory activity of PF4-DLR can be increased in vivo by combined treatment with PF4-DLR and ILK1 siRNA in the experimental glioma model in mice. A first osmotic mini-pump releasing PF4-DLR (0.5 mg/kg/day) was implanted 12 days after tumor injection, and followed, after additional ten days, by the implantation of a second minipump, intrathecally connected, releasing ILK1 siRNA (0.4 mg/day). Animals were sacrificed 10 days later. As control, some mice were left untreated and others were treated with PF4-DLR alone for 20 days (see Table S2). As shown in Figure 4C and 4D, the expression of ILK1 was greatly reduced in tumors when mice were treated with ILK1 siRNA.
Untreated mice developed a large and compact tumor masses occupying about half of the brain with a smooth and regular margin, whereas treatment with PF4-DLR alone reduced tumor volume to ∼30% of untreated control. Combined treatment with PF4-DLR and ILK1-siRNA further reduced the size to ∼6% of untreated control (NT: 9.1±1.1; DLR: 3.2±0.4: DLR+ILK1 siRNA: 0.6±0.07 mm3) (Figure 5A and 5B). The effect of PF4-DLR and ILK1 siRNA on tumor angiogenesis was also evaluated by staining with anti-CD31 antibody. PF4-DLR alone significantly reduced the number of vessels, but the reduction was even greater after the combined treatment (NT: 64.8±6.5; DLR: 31.8±2.1; DLR+ILK1 siRNA: 17.1±1.5) (Figure 5C and D).
ILK1 expression in human gliomas
We measured ILK1 expression in human glioblastomas (GBM), astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas by immunoblotting. Ten GBM, 12 oligodendrogliomas and 8 astrocytomas were analyzed. Expression of ILK1 and its major substrate, pAKT, varied as shown in Figure 6A and 6C. Tumors expressed low, medium or high levels of ILK1 and pAKT, and this was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Figure 6B shows two different oligodendrogliomas expressing low and high levels of ILK1).
We also correlated ILK1 expression levels of tumors to the time of recurrence (NR: long-term recurrence, more than one year after initial treatment, R: short-term recurrence, less than four months after initial treatment). ILK1 was significantly more expressed in the subset of patients with early recurrence in all three types of glioma (Figures 6E and 6F; astrocytomas: NR 0.47±0.12 R 2.51±0.9; oligodendrogliomas NR 0.6±0.13 R 1.2±0.2; GBMs NR 0.4±0.07 R 0.9±0.15). This suggests that gliomas expressing high ILK1 levels are more aggressive.
Discussion
Previous experiments have shown that PF4-DLR reduces angiogenesis and inhibits tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner in the U87-MG model. We identified 24 proteins that were differentially expressed in the tumors treated with PF4-DLR for 10 days (14 up-regulated and 10 down-regulated), some of which are known to be involved in tumor development, and may constitute potential prognostic markers or therapeutic targets.
Annexin A1 (ANXA1), which plays an important role in regulating cell growth and apoptosis, was increased in treated tumors. Reduced ANXA1 expression has been observed in many different human malignancies, and the overexpression of ANXA1 in tumor cells leads to growth suppression and/or apoptosis [22].
Tumor growth and differentiation closely correlate with protein synthesis and degradation [23]–[24].We detected a significant increase of proteasome subunit alpha type 6, proteasome subunit alpha type 4 and 26S protease regulatory subunit S10B after PF4-DLR treatment. This indicates that anti-angiogenic treatment may induce molecular and functional changes in the intra-cellular proteolytic machinery.
Human glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is highly expressed in many human cancers including gliomas [25]. High GSTP1 expression is associated with drug resistance, a more aggressive clinical course, and poor patient survival. The GSTP1 plays a major role in metabolism and xenobiotic detoxification, in which it catalyses the S-conjugation of a wide variety of endogenous and exogenous compounds [26]. There is also evidence indicating that it plays a role in many other important cellular processes, including stress, growth factor-induced signalling, cell proliferation, immune response, differentiation, cell transformation and apoptosis [27].
The GSTP1 is phosphorylated by Ser/Thr protein kinases, PKA and PKC, and this enhances its metabolic function [28]. We found that the more acidic form of GSTP1 was reduced in glioblastomas treated with PF4-DLR for 10 days. Interestingly, Western blot analysis revealed a decrease in PKC levels which suggests that PF4-DLR treatment regulates GSTP1 function by reducing its phosphorylation.
After 20 days of treatment, glioblastomas are still responsive to PF4-DLR. However, if treatment is prolonged, glioblastomas start to activate new pathways which may induce drug resistance. We identified 30 proteins that were differentially expressed (p<0.05) after 20 days of PF4-DLR treatment of which 24 were up-regulated and six down-regulated (Figure 1B and Table 2). As most of these proteins seem to be functionally involved in positively regulating tumor growth, glioblastomas may develop resistance to PF4-DLR by regulating this specific set of proteins.
There was a significant increase of the most acidic of the three spots corresponding to elongation factor 2 (eEF2). This is compatible with post-translational modifications of eEF2 through phosphorylation after PF4-DLR treatment, as previously demonstrated for eEF2. There is evidence that CaM-dependent phosphorylation of eEF2 is associated with cell proliferation in rat glia and gliomas [29]. We found that eEF2K expression is only increased by PF4-DLR treatment after 20 days. We also found an up-regulation of vinculin and fascin, which are key elements of cell motility. Increased expression of these proteins promotes cell migration and metastases [30].
The significance of ILK1 expression after PF4-DLR treatment was investigated in greater detail. ILK1 was down-regulated in glioblastomas treated with PF4-DLR for 10 days, but up-regulated after 20 days. This suggested that ILK1 expression correlates with treatment response, at least in our experimental model. ILK1 is a protein involved in intracellular signal transduction of integrins and growth factor receptors. In some tumors, increased ILK1 levels are required for cell growth/survival, cell cycle progression, invasion and migration, and tumor angiogenesis [21], [31], [32]. ILK1 overexpression in tumor cells induces the acquisition of an invasive phenotype and cell transformation. The role and regulation of ILK1 in gliomas has only been partially studied. A link with tumor cell invasion has been proposed [33], [34]. Furthermore, it can interfere with the cellular response to anti-cancer drugs such as resistance to gemcitabine in adenocarcinoma, an effect that is mediated by protein kinase B/Akt [35]. In a recent study, Edwards et al. found that inhibiting ILK1 with small molecule inhibitors causes reduced hypoxia, decreases tumor vascular mass and decreases functional vasculature in a mouse model of glioblastoma [36]. Interestingly ILK1 increases the expression of VEGF which imply that ILK1 might represent a key molecule for a positive loop inducing angiogenesis and tumor grown.
We found an association between ILK1 levels and AKT phosphorylation at Ser473, which indicates that PF4-DLR treatment for 10 days reduces glioblastomas growth by inhibiting the AKT pathway. As epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a key player in neoplastic progression [37] and AKT is a key effector of EGFR signalling, we analyzed EGFR levels in glioblastoma treated with PF4-DLR. Similar as observed with ILK1, 10 days of treatment led to EGFR down-regulation, but 20 days of treatment led to an increase in expression. The pattern of ILK1 expression after PF4-DLR treatment therefore correlates with AKT phosphorylation and EGFR expression. Interestingly it has been shown that ILK1 expression is induced by EGF [21], thus our data might suggest that PF4-DLR is able to increase the expression of EGFR which in turn can increase the response to EGF and the expression of ILK1.
The approach to target ILK1 is also supported by Edwards et al. They [36] demonstrated that inhibition of ILK1 alone is able to delay but not to stop tumor grown. We therefore decided to inhibit ILK1 using siRNA in addition to PF4-DLR administration in order to investigate whether this will further improve therapeutic efficacy in vivo over PF4-DLR alone.
At this point we need to clarify if after 10 days of treatment with PF4-DLR alone it is required to continue the anti-angiogenic therapy in association with ILK1 knock down or it is sufficient to continue only knocking down ILK1 to block or eradicate the tumor. In any case we think that the most important point is design effective combination treatment; this because the current opinion is that to eradicate tumor a single agent therapy is not enough.
We believe that the synergism of angiogenesis inhibitors with ILK1 inhibitors (such as PF4-DLR and ILK1 siRNA) should be tested using small molecular inhibitors blocking ILK1 function and not siRNA. Synthetic siRNA are extremely expensive and not likely to be used for systemic administration in the clinic.
It has been found that the overexpression of kinase-inactive ILK increases the sensitivity of EGFR-resistant hepatoma cell lines to the EGFR inhibitors erlotinib, gefitinib and cetuximab in vitro and in vivo [38]. These data demonstrate that inhibiting ILK activity may represent a novel mechanism for overcoming resistance to EGFR inhibitors.
ILK1 expression often correlates with the malignancy and poor survival in a number of tumors [39] including gliomas [34]. In our study, ILK1 expression seems to be associated with early recurrence in 3 glioma types. This finding suggests that ILK1 levels are related to tumor aggressiveness and its tendency to progress.
In conclusion, we found that ILK1 is involved in tumor response to anti-angiogenic therapy with PF4-DLR in a xenografted model of glioblastoma. Furthermore, its expression seems to be associated with the aggressiveness of the disease. Combined therapy associating anti-angiogenesis with inhibition of ILK1 may significantly enhance efficacy. This could represent a new venue for the development therapies for malignant glioma.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank M. Bonneu (Genomic plateform, University Bordeaux) for proteomic data generation and mass spectrometry analysis.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This study was supported by grants from the AIRC (the Italian Cancer Research Association), Fondazione Italo Monzino and Fondazione Berlucchi (to LB), from “the Association sur la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)” and the “Ligue contre le Cancer” (to AB) and Fondazione CARIPLO (grant 2009.264) and Regione Lombardia (grant TERDISMENTAL) (to CS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sundberg C, Nagy JA, Brown LF, Feng D, Eckelhoefer IA, et al. Glomeruloid microvascular proliferation follows adenoviral vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-164 gene delivery. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1145–1160. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64062-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagy JA, Vasile E, Feng D, Sundberg C, Brown LF, et al. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor induces lymphangiogenesis as well as angiogenesis. J Exp Med. 2002;196:1497–1506. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Groothuis DR, Pasternak JF, Fischer JM, Blasberg RG, Bigner DD, et al. Regional measurements of blood flow in experimental RG-2 rat gliomas. Cancer Res. 1983;43:3362–3367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vajkoczy P, Menger MD. Vascular microenvironment in gliomas. Cancer Treat Res. 2004;117:249–262. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8871-3_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bergers G, Hanahan D. Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:592–603. doi: 10.1038/nrc2442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hagedorn M, Zilberberg L, Wilting J, Canron X, Carrabba G, et al. Domain swapping in a COOH-terminal fragment of platelet factor 4 generates potent angiogenesis inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6884–6890. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bello L, Lucini V, Costa F, Pluderi M, Giussani C, et al. Combinatorial administration of molecules that simultaneously inhibit angiogenesis and invasion leads to increased therapeutic efficacy in mouse models of malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:4527–4537. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tannock I. Response of aerobic and hypoxic cells in a solid tumor to adriamycin and cyclophosphamide and interaction of the drugs with radiation. Cancer Res. 1982;42:4921–4926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Persad S, Attwell S, Gray V, Mawji N, Deng JT, et al. Regulation of protein kinase B/Akt-serine 473 phosphorylation by integrin-linked kinase: critical roles for kinase activity and amino acids arginine 211 and serine 343. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27462–27469. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102940200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Delcommenne M, Tan C, Gray V, Rue L, Woodgett J, et al. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase-dependent regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase B/AKT by the integrin-linked kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11211–11216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tan C, Cruet-Hennequart S, Troussard A, Fazli L, Costello P, et al. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by integrin-linked kinase (ILK). Cancer Cell. 2004;5:79–90. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00281-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hannigan GE, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Fitz-Gibbon L, Coppolino MG, Radeva G, et al. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase. Nature. 1996;379:91–96. doi: 10.1038/379091a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Radeva G, Petrocelli T, Behrend E, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Filmus J, et al. Overexpression of the integrin-linked kinase promotes anchorage-independent cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13937–13944. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Attwell S, Roskelley C, Dedhar S. The integrin-linked kinase (ILK) suppresses anoikis. Oncogene. 2000;19:3811–3815. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Edwards LA, Verreault M, Thiessen B, Dragowska WH, Hu Y, et al. Combined inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways results in synergistic effects in glioblastoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:645–654. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Monferran S, Skuli N, Delmas C, Favre G, Bonnet J, et al. Alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrins control glioma cell response to ionising radiation through ILK and RhoB. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:357–364. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bello L, Carrabba G, Giussani C, Lucini V, Cerutti F, et al. Low-dose chemotherapy combined with an antiangiogenic drug reduces human glioma growth in vivo. Cancer Res. 2001;61:7501–7506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, Sagliocco F, Wilm M, et al. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14440–14445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:3551–3567. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Troussard AA, Mawji NM, Ong C, Mui A, St -Arnaud R, et al. Conditional knock-out of integrin-linked kinase demonstrates an essential role in protein kinase B/Akt activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:22374–22378. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303083200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Driver GA, Veale RB. Modulation of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) expression in human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by the EGF and TGFbeta1 growth factors. Cancer Cell Int. 2006;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-6-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lim LH, Pervaiz S. Annexin 1: the new face of an old molecule. Faseb J. 2007;21:968–975. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7464rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Almond JB, Cohen GM. The proteasome: a novel target for cancer chemotherapy. Leukemia. 2002;16:433–443. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kallio PJ, Wilson WJ, O'Brien S, Makino Y, Poellinger L. Regulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1alpha by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:6519–6525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.10.6519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ali-Osman F, Brunner JM, Kutluk TM, Hess K. Prognostic significance of glutathione S-transferase pi expression and subcellular localization in human gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:2253–2261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boyland E, Chasseaud LF. The role of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in mercapturic acid biosynthesis. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1969;32:173–219. doi: 10.1002/9780470122778.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Villafania A, Anwar K, Amar S, Chie L, Way D, et al. Glutathione-S-Transferase as a selective inhibitor of oncogenic ras-p21-induced mitogenic signaling through blockade of activation of jun by jun-N-terminal kinase. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2000;30:57–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lo HW, Antoun GR, Ali-Osman F. The human glutathione S-transferase P1 protein is phosphorylated and its metabolic function enhanced by the Ser/Thr protein kinases, cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C, in glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:9131–9138. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parmer TG, Ward MD, Hait WN. Effects of rottlerin, an inhibitor of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase III, on cellular proliferation, viability, and cell cycle distribution in malignant glioma cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1997;8:327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jing R, Pizzolato G, Robson RM, Gabbiani G, Skalli O. Intermediate filament protein synemin is present in human reactive and malignant astrocytes and associates with ruffled membranes in astrocytoma cells. Glia. 2005;50:107–120. doi: 10.1002/glia.20158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dai DL, Makretsov N, Campos EI, Huang C, Zhou Y, et al. Increased expression of integrin-linked kinase is correlated with melanoma progression and poor patient survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:4409–4414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Edwards LA, Thiessen B, Dragowska WH, Daynard T, Bally MB, et al. Inhibition of ILK in PTEN-mutant human glioblastomas inhibits PKB/Akt activation, induces apoptosis, and delays tumor growth. Oncogene. 2005;24:3596–3605. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Troussard AA, Costello P, Yoganathan TN, Kumagai S, Roskelley CD, et al. The integrin linked kinase (ILK) induces an invasive phenotype via AP-1 transcription factor-dependent upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9). Oncogene. 2000;19:5444–5452. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Obara S, Nakata M, Takeshima H, Katagiri H, Asano T, et al. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) regulation of the cell viability in PTEN mutant glioblastoma and in vitro inhibition by the specific COX-2 inhibitor NS-398. Cancer Lett. 2004;208:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duxbury MS, Ito H, Benoit E, Waseem T, Ashley SW, et al. RNA interference demonstrates a novel role for integrin-linked kinase as a determinant of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell gemcitabine chemoresistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:3433–3438. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Edwards LA, Woo J, Huxham LA, Verreault M, Dragowska WH, et al. Suppression of VEGF secretion and changes in glioblastoma multiforme microenvironment by inhibition of integrin-linked kinase (ILK). Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:59–70. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tong GM, Rajah TT, Pento JT. The differential influence of EGF, IGF-I, and TGF-beta on the invasiveness of human breast cancer cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2000;36:493–494. doi: 10.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0493:TDIOEI>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fuchs BC, Fujii T, Dorfman JD, Goodwin JM, Zhu AX, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and integrin-linked kinase mediate sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in human hepatoma cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2391–2399. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marotta A, Tan C, Gray V, Malik S, Gallinger S, et al. Dysregulation of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) signaling in colonic polyposis. Oncogene. 2001;20:6250–6257. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.