Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1987 Dec;84(23):8439–8443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.23.8439

Stable and heritable inhibition of the expression of nopaline synthase in tobacco expressing antisense RNA

Steven J Rothstein 1, Joseph DiMaio 1, Micheline Strand 1, Douglas Rice 1
PMCID: PMC299559  PMID: 16593903

Abstract

Antisense nopaline synthase (nos) (D-nopaline synthase; EC 1.5.1.19) RNA is stably expressed from the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transformed tobacco plants. The expression of a previously introduced wild-type nos gene is inhibited by the antisense RNA, with less nos enzyme activity detected (by a factor of 8-50) depending on the tissue analyzed. The steady-state levels of nos mRNA are reduced in the presence of the antisense RNA, implying that mRNA degradation is probably the main mode of action for the decrease in expression in this system. The antisense RNA-expressing gene and its inhibition of nos expression are shown to be heritable, demonstrating that it is a potentially useful method for the modification of phenotype.

Keywords: chimeric gene, minus-strand RNA, plant transformation, stable expression

Full text

PDF
8440

Images in this article

8441Image
on p.8441
8442Image
on p.8442
8442Image
on p.8442
8442Image
on p.8442

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985 Mar 8;227(4691):1229–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4691.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Crowley T. E., Nellen W., Gomer R. H., Firtel R. A. Phenocopy of discoidin I-minus mutants by antisense transformation in Dictyostelium. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):633–641. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90235-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ecker J. R., Davis R. W. Inhibition of gene expression in plant cells by expression of antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(15):5372–5376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.15.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Izant J. G., Weintraub H. Inhibition of thymidine kinase gene expression by anti-sense RNA: a molecular approach to genetic analysis. Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim S. K., Wold B. J. Stable reduction of thymidine kinase activity in cells expressing high levels of anti-sense RNA. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):129–138. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Melton D. A. Injected anti-sense RNAs specifically block messenger RNA translation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(1):144–148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Melton D. A., Krieg P. A., Rebagliati M. R., Maniatis T., Zinn K., Green M. R. Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 25;12(18):7035–7056. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.18.7035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mizuno T., Chou M. Y., Inouye M. A unique mechanism regulating gene expression: translational inhibition by a complementary RNA transcript (micRNA). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1966–1970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Otten L. A., Schilperoort R. A. A rapid micro scale method for the detection of lysopine and nopaline dehydrogenase activities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Dec 8;527(2):497–500. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(78)90363-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenberg U. B., Preiss A., Seifert E., Jäckle H., Knipple D. C. Production of phenocopies by Krüppel antisense RNA injection into Drosophila embryos. Nature. 1985 Feb 21;313(6004):703–706. doi: 10.1038/313703a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rothstein S. J., Lahners K. N., Lotstein R. J., Carozzi N. B., Jayne S. M., Rice D. A. Promoter cassettes, antibiotic-resistance genes, and vectors for plant transformation. Gene. 1987;53(2-3):153–161. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanders P. R., Winter J. A., Barnason A. R., Rogers S. G., Fraley R. T. Comparison of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and nopaline synthase promoters in transgenic plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 25;15(4):1543–1558. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.4.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Simons R. W., Kleckner N. Translational control of IS10 transposition. Cell. 1983 Sep;34(2):683–691. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90401-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yadav N. S., Vanderleyden J., Bennett D. R., Barnes W. M., Chilton M. D. Short direct repeats flank the T-DNA on a nopaline Ti plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Oct;79(20):6322–6326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.20.6322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yamada S., Itano H. Phenanthrenequinone as an analytical reagent for arginine and other monosubstituted guanidines. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Dec 28;130(2):538–540. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(66)90256-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zinn K., DiMaio D., Maniatis T. Identification of two distinct regulatory regions adjacent to the human beta-interferon gene. Cell. 1983 Oct;34(3):865–879. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90544-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zoller M. J., Smith M. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis: a simple method using two oligonucleotide primers and a single-stranded DNA template. DNA. 1984 Dec;3(6):479–488. doi: 10.1089/dna.1.1984.3.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES