Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1987 Dec;84(24):8758–8762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.8758

Chemical kinetic measurements of a mammalian acetylcholine receptor by a fast-reaction technique.

J B Udgaonkar 1, G P Hess 1
PMCID: PMC299629  PMID: 2447583

Abstract

In the presence of acetylcholine, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor undergoes two rapid conformational changes: one in the 1-ms time region, leading to the formation of a transmembrane channel and signal transmission between cells, and the other in the 100-ms time region, leading to an inactive "desensitized" form with altered ligand-binding properties. To determine the properties of the receptor that are relevant for channel opening and signal transmission, we have developed a cell-flow technique that allows measurements to be made with cells prior to receptor desensitization. Here we illustrate the usefulness of the technique. A wide concentration range of both a ligand that controls the opening of receptor channels (carbamoylcholine) and a receptor inhibitor (procaine) was used to measure the dissociation constant of the receptor site controlling channel opening (2.4 X 10(-4) M), the channel-opening equilibrium constant (5.5), the inhibition constant for procaine (5.8 X 10(-5) M), and the rate coefficients for two desensitization processes of 5 s-1 and 0.2 s-1. The cell-flow technique illustrated here is of interest because, by rapid-reaction techniques, it extends the chemical kinetic approach from investigations of reactions in solutions to investigations of many different receptors that exist in membranes of central nervous system cells and whose properties are not well known.

Full text

PDF
8761

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bormann J., Clapham D. E. gamma-Aminobutyric acid receptor channels in adrenal chromaffin cells: a patch-clamp study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Apr;82(7):2168–2172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.7.2168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brett R. S., Dilger J. P., Adams P. R., Lancaster B. A method for the rapid exchange of solutions bathing excised membrane patches. Biophys J. 1986 Nov;50(5):987–992. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83539-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cash D. J., Hess G. P. Molecular mechanism of acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation across cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):842–846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cash D. J., Hess G. P. Quenched flow technique with plasma membrane vesicles: acetylcholine receptor-mediated transmembrane ion flux. Anal Biochem. 1981 Mar 15;112(1):39–51. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90257-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Changeux J. P., Devillers-Thiéry A., Chemouilli P. Acetylcholine receptor: an allosteric protein. Science. 1984 Sep 21;225(4668):1335–1345. doi: 10.1126/science.6382611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clapham D. E., Neher E. Substance P reduces acetylcholine-induced currents in isolated bovine chromaffin cells. J Physiol. 1984 Feb;347:255–277. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of bursts of single ion channel openings and of clusters of bursts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Dec 24;300(1098):1–59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fenwick E. M., Marty A., Neher E. A patch-clamp study of bovine chromaffin cells and of their sensitivity to acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1982 Oct;331:577–597. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamill O. P., Marty A., Neher E., Sakmann B., Sigworth F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamm T. M., Reinking R. M., Roscoe D. D., Stuart D. G. Synchronous afferent discharge from a passive muscle of the cat: significance for interpreting spike-triggered averages. J Physiol. 1985 Aug;365:77–102. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hess G. P., Cash D. J., Aoshima H. Acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion fluxes in membrane vesicles investigated by fast reaction techniques. Nature. 1979 Nov 15;282(5736):329–331. doi: 10.1038/282329a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hess G. P., Cash D. J., Aoshima H. Acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation: chemical kinetic investigations of the mechanism. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1983;12:443–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.12.060183.002303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hess G. P., Lipkowitz S., Struve G. E. Acetylcholine-receptor-mediated ion flux in electroplax membrane microsacs (vesicles): change in mechanism produced by asymmetrical distribution of sodium and potassium ions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1703–1707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hess G. P., Udgaonkar J. B., Olbricht W. L. Chemical kinetic measurements of transmembrane processes using rapid reaction techniques: acetylcholine receptor. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1987;16:507–534. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.002451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jackson M. B., Lecar H., Mathers D. A., Barker J. L. Single channel currents activated by gamma-aminobutyric acid, muscimol, and (-)-pentobarbital in cultured mouse spinal neurons. J Neurosci. 1982 Jul;2(7):889–894. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-07-00889.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karpen J. W., Aoshima H., Abood L. G., Hess G. P. Cocaine and phencyclidine inhibition of the acetylcholine receptor: analysis of the mechanisms of action based on measurements of ion flux in the millisecond-to-minute time region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2509–2513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karpen J. W., Hess G. P. Cocaine, phencyclidine, and procaine inhibition of the acetylcholine receptor: characterization of the binding site by stopped-flow measurements of receptor-controlled ion flux in membrane vesicles. Biochemistry. 1986 Apr 8;25(7):1777–1785. doi: 10.1021/bi00355a049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krishtal O. A., Pidoplichko V. I. A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience. 1980;5(12):2325–2327. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neher E., Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260(5554):799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neher E. The charge carried by single-channel currents of rat cultured muscle cells in the presence of local anaesthetics. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:663–678. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson D. J., Sachs F. Single ionic channels observed in tissue-cultured muscle. Nature. 1979 Dec 20;282(5741):861–863. doi: 10.1038/282861a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nowak L. M., Young A. B., Macdonald R. L. GABA and bicuculline actions on mouse spinal cord and cortical neurons in cell culture. Brain Res. 1982 Jul 22;244(1):155–164. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90913-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nowak L., Bregestovski P., Ascher P., Herbet A., Prochiantz A. Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature. 1984 Feb 2;307(5950):462–465. doi: 10.1038/307462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ogden D. C., Colquhoun D. The efficacy of agonists at the frog neuromuscular junction studied with single channel recording. Pflugers Arch. 1983 Nov;399(3):246–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00656725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sachs F., Neil J., Barkakati N. The automated analysis of data from single ionic channels. Pflugers Arch. 1982 Dec;395(4):331–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00580798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sakmann B., Hamill O. P., Bormann J. Patch-clamp measurements of elementary chloride currents activated by the putative inhibitory transmitter GABA and glycine in mammalian spinal neurons. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1983;18:83–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sakmann B., Patlak J., Neher E. Single acetylcholine-activated channels show burst-kinetics in presence of desensitizing concentrations of agonist. Nature. 1980 Jul 3;286(5768):71–73. doi: 10.1038/286071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schubert D., Harris A. J., Devine C. E., Heinemann S. Characterization of a unique muscle cell line. J Cell Biol. 1974 May;61(2):398–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.61.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shiono S., Takeyasu K., Udgaonkar J. B., Delcour A. H., Fujita N., Hess G. P. Regulatory properties of acetylcholine receptor: evidence for two different inhibitory sites, one for acetylcholine and the other for a noncompetitive inhibitor of receptor function (procaine). Biochemistry. 1984 Dec 18;23(26):6889–6893. doi: 10.1021/bi00321a094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sine S. M., Steinbach J. H. Activation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):175–185. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84146-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sine S. M., Taylor P. Relationship between reversible antagonist occupancy and the functional capacity of the acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem. 1981 Jul 10;256(13):6692–6699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sine S. M., Taylor P. The relationship between agonist occupation and the permeability response of the cholinergic receptor revealed by bound cobra alpha-toxin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 10;255(21):10144–10156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sine S., Taylor P. Functional consequences of agonist-mediated state transitions in the cholinergic receptor. Studies in cultured muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1979 May 10;254(9):3315–3325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Udgaonkar J. B., Hess G. P. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics: chemical kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1986;93(2):93–109. doi: 10.1007/BF01870803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES