Skip to main content
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons logoLink to JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
. 2004 Jul-Sep;8(3):283–285.

Clipless Cholecystectomy: Broadening the Role of the Harmonic Scalpel

James Westervelt 1,
PMCID: PMC3016810  PMID: 15347120

Abstract

Background:

The ultrasonically activated (Harmonic) scalpel has proven to be an effective, efficient, and safe instrument for dissection and hemostasis in both open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. To date, the primary use of the Harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomies has been for the division of the cystic artery and liver bed dissection. Advancements in the Harmonic scalpel blade tip now provide for the reliable ultrasonic division and closure of the cystic duct.

Methods:

In a personal, prospective series involving 100 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies, the Harmonic scalpel was used as the sole instrument for division of the cystic duct and artery as well as dissection of the liver bed. Two patients with large cystic ducts (over 5 mm) received an additional ductal ligature.

Results:

No patients developed postoperative hemorrhage or bile leakage.

Conclusion:

The Harmonic scalpel provides complete hemobiliary stasis for most patients and is a safe alternative to standard clip or ligature closure of the cystic duct. Furthermore, there may be a cost savings inherent in a procedure utilizing a single disposable instrument.

Keywords: Harmonic scalpel, Cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Designed as a safe alternative to electrocautery for the hemostatic dissection of tissue, the ultrasonically activated (Harmonic) scalpel was introduced into clinical use nearly a decade ago. This innovative method of cutting tissue was based upon the coagulating and cavitational effects provided by a rapidly vibrating blade contacting various tissues.1, 2 The resulting decrease in temperatures, smoke, and lateral tissue damage placed the Harmonic scalpel in contrast to the effects seen with the more traditional electrosurgery/cautery. In addition, the elimination of inadvertent, sometimes unrecognized, electrical arcing injuries with their potentially hazardous sequelae supported the role of the Harmonic scalpel as a potentially safer instrument for tissue dissection.

Since its inception, the Harmonic scalpel has gained significant clinician acceptance and applications. Uses now range widely to include surgery of the head and neck, chest, liver, spleen, kidney, adrenal glands, colon, rectum, gastroesophageal junction, and others. Although variously described in the literature, wide acceptance and usage of the Harmonic scalpel for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies is lacking among our American general surgeon colleagues. Clip and cautery techniques predominate. Furthermore, total Harmonic scalpel dissection in the performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a technique described only in the European literature3 and, at best, is only anecdotal in the United States.

This study was undertaken to demonstrate the efficiency, safety, and cost effectiveness of the Harmonic scalpel as the sole instrument to achieve complete hemobiliary stasis in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

METHODS

Over an 11-month interval (12/00–10/01) in a private, community based, general surgery practice, 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed on patients at Clark Memorial Hospital, Jeffersonville, Indiana. Patient selection was based on clinical findings of acute or chronic cholecystitis and consecutive presentation.

Patient ages ranged from 17 years to 73 years, and treatment was rendered in both elective outpatient and acute inpatient settings.

Operative procedures were performed with the patient under general anesthesia and placed in the standard supine, crucifix, reverse-Trendelenburg position. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved by either Veress needle or visually guided cannula CO2 insufflation. All procedures were performed through 2 operative ports and a camera port.

Dissection of the gallbladder was initiated at the Triangle of Calot with identification, skeletization, and division of the cystic duct and artery. Antegrade mobilization of the gallbladder from the liver bed followed with subsequent removal of the specimen through the umbilicus. In all but 2 cases, closure and division of the cystic duct and artery as well as mobilization of the gallbladder from the liver bed were accomplished solely with the Harmonic scalpel equipped with an LCS-C5 curved blade tip at a level 2 setting. Two patients with visibly large cystic ducts (greater than 5 mm) underwent additional Endoloop closure of the duct remnant.

No intraoperative cholangiograms were performed. Any patients presenting with clinical evidence of choledocholithiasis or biliary pancreatitis underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) evaluation and treatment. All patients were evaluated up to 4 weeks postoperatively in the office. A cost comparison was carried out to determine any potential cost benefit in using the Harmonic scalpel as a single disposable instrument.

RESULTS

In this study, 100 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed on appropriately selected patients. There were no conversions to open cholecystectomy and no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. The operative times varied depending on the degree of pericholecystic and cholecystic and/or associated intraperitoneal adhesions with an average incision to closure time of 42 minutes. Division of the cystic duct by the Harmonic scalpel required approximately 2 to 3 minutes, depending on the ductal thickness and associated inflammation. In general, the cavitational effect on the surrounding pericholecystic tissues, especially in the region of the liver bed, allowed for easier mobilization of the gallbladder, thus avoiding inadvertent compromise of the gallbladder wall and bile spillage. No liver bed charring or bilious seepage from any ducts of Luschka was observed.

Length of procedure, hospital stay, and return to full functional status did not vary significantly from patients observed previously (personal experience) who underwent clip and cautery procedures.

All 100 patients evaluated in the office postoperatively demonstrated no evidence of bile leakage or atypical complaints.

At Clark Memorial Hospital, the cost of a disposable LCSC5 Harmonic scalpel blade tip is $330.00. The combined cost of a disposable Endoshears and clip-applier is $350.00. These prices exclude any additional charges that the hospital receives for electrocautery or Harmonic scalpel supplies or generators.

DISCUSSION

This study clearly demonstrates that the Harmonic scalpel provides complete and reliable hemobiliary stasis in most patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In all patients who underwent division of the cystic duct and artery by Harmonic scalpel alone, there were no clinically apparent immediate or remote postoperative bile leaks or hemorrhages. In the 2 patients with larger diameter cystic ducts (greater than 5 mm) identified intraoperatively, closure was accomplished with application of a chromic Endoloop. Harmonic scalpel division alone was not attempted due to the inherent limitations of the instrument.

Except for the 2- to 3-minute interval required for cystic duct division, use of the Harmonic scalpel did not adversely affect the length of procedures. In fact, properties intrinsic to the Harmonic scalpel (cavitation and smokeless coagulation) seem to provide an advantage over electrocautery in the dissection of the gallbladder and may enhance surgeon performance. Certainly, Harmonic scalpel division of the cystic duct could be utilized independently of the direction of gallbladder dissection.

One additional benefit of Harmonic scalpel dissection of the liver bed is the more effective closure of the ducts of Luschka. While rarely of clinical significance, bile leakage from the liver bed may contribute to postoperative pain, small bilomas, and the occasional return to the operative room.

Objective data documenting length of hospitalization and resumption of normal activities were not studied. In a previous investigation, Tsimoyiannis et al4 demonstrated comparable recovery times in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies using ultrasonically activated shears for dissection when compared with patients undergoing the more traditional clip and cautery technique. Subjective observations throughout this study would substantiate this finding.

There appears to be a cost benefit when using a single disposable instrument (LCS-C5 Harmonic scalpel blade tip), especially when compared with the usage of the disposable Endoshears and clip-applier in combination. At Clark Memorial Hospital, the difference is approximately $20.00 per case. The cost benefit is more apparent in cases where other disposable instruments are used in conjunction with the Harmonic scalpel. However, it would be unrealistic to extrapolate these savings on a national level. Instrument costs vary considerably across the United States, depending on manufacturer fees, regional distribution contract fees, and hospital markups. Hopefully, a cost benefit would be realized in the majority of the country.

CONCLUSION

The Harmonic scalpel is a safe, efficient, and practical instrument to use during laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and its role can be expanded to include complete hemobiliary stasis.

References:

  • 1. Amaral JF. The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:(2):92–99 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. McCarus SD. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3,(4):601–608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Huscher CGS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by Harmonic dissection. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1256–1257 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tsimoyiannis EC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using ultrasonically activated coagulating shears. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8(6):421–424 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons are provided here courtesy of Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons

RESOURCES