Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2011 Feb 3;(79):11–20. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.79.803

A simultaneous journal / wiki publication and dissemination of a new species description: Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. from northern Australia (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Bidessini)

Lars Hendrich 1, Michael Balke 2
PMCID: PMC3088048  PMID: 21594142

Abstract Abstract

Here, we describe a new Australian species in journal format and simultaneously open the description in a wiki format on the www.species-id.net. The wiki format will always link to the fixed original journal description of the taxon, however it permits future edits and additions to species' taxonomy and biology. The diving beetle Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Bidessini) is described based on a single female, collected in a rest pool of the Harriet Creek in the Darwin Area, Northern Territory. Within Neobidessodes the new species is well characterized by its elongate oval body with rounded sides, short and stout segments of antennae, length of body and dorsal surface coloration. In addition to external morphology, we used mitochondrial cox1 sequence data to support generic assignment and to delineate the new species from other Australian Bidessini including all other known Neobidessodes. Illustrations based on digital images are provided here and as online resources. A modified key is provided. Altogether ten species of the genus are now known worldwide, nine from Australia and one from New Guinea.

Keywords: Wiki, species ID, online species pages, cox1, sequence data, DNA barcoding, molecular biodiversity assessment

Introduction

Many approaches and initiatives to “accelerate” the descriptive taxonomic process have recently been proposed or partially implemented. We suggest that the wikimedia engine provides one of the most powerful tools for routine taxonomic work, with wikipedia providing generic data and wikispecies a taxonomic backbone, i.e. the tree of life (see Page 2010). Here, we test an approach where we publish a new species in open-access journal format, and at the same time upload the data to a purpose-buildt wiki, the species ID site, flanked by a wikispecies entry which de facto serves as a "shop window".

The epigean species of the Australasian genus Neobidessodes Hendrich & Balke, 2009 were recently treated in a comprehensive systematic revision, including morphological and molecular data (Hendrich et al. 2009). Two new species, one from Australia and one from New Guinea, were described. Larvae of the genus were described in Michat et al. (2010). In northern Australia, Neobidessodes are among the most common and widespread diving beetles occurring in rest pools of intermittent streams during the dry season. Despite the fact that the first author studied more than 6000 specimens from his own samples and numerous museum collections (Hendrich et al. 2009), the new species described in this publication is known just from the female holotype. The single specimen was until recently overlooked in a vial, including numerous Neobidessodes mjobergi (Zimmermann 1922) and Hydroglpyhus godeffroyi (Sharp 1882) collected in August 2006, on the way from Pine Creek to the Kakadu National Park.

Combining morphology and mitochondrial DNA sequence data we describe the new species and provide a modified key for all epigean species of the genus. The DNA sequence data and a high resolution digital image of the beetle habitus, coloration and sculpture are made available online for faster dissemination of taxonomic knowledge. Links are provided below.

Material and methods

Material.

This study is based on the examination of 26 specimens, the holotype of our new species and specimens of Neobidessodes bilita (Watts, 1978) and Neobidessodes mjobergi,deposited in CLH, SAMA and ZSM.

Neobiodessodes bilita (Watts, 1978): Australia, New South Wales. 12 exs., S NSW, 6.5 km SW Eden, Towamba Road 2 km N Nullica, 556 m, 16.XI.2006, 37.04.412S 149.51.200E, L. & E. Hendrich leg. (NSW 111), two specimens with “DNA M.Balke 1900”, “DNA M.Balke 1901” [green printed labels] (CLH, ZSM).

Neobidessodes mjobergi (Zimmermann, 1922): Australia, Northern Territory. 13 exs., Manton Dam Recreation Area, 46 km S Darwin, 35 m, 19.VIII.2006, 12.50.270S 131.08.050E, L. & E. Hendrich leg. (NT 1), one specimen with “DNA M.Balke 1656” [green printed label] (CLH, ZSM).

Descriptions.

Beetles were studied with a Leica MZ 12.5 dissecting scope at 10–100x. Habitus photos of beetles were made by Alexander Riedel (Karlsruhe, Germany) and by the authors. Image stacks were aligned and assembled with the computer software Helicon Focus 4.77TM. Abbreviations used in the text are: TL (total length), TL-H (total length without head), and MW (maximum width). Label data of type material are cited in quotation marks.

DNA sequencing and data analysis.

We extracted DNA from the alcohol preserved female holotype after removal of the abdomen, using the Qiagen Dneasy tissue kit. We ran a PCR with Bioline Mago Taq at 94° for 2 min, 40 cycles of 94° for 30 s, 47° for 30 s and 72° for 60 s, and a final extension of 72° for 10 min, using primers for the 3’ end of cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1) Jerry (F: 5’- CAA CAT TTA TTT TGA TTT TTT GG -3’) and Pat (R: 5’- TCC AAT GCA CTA ATC TGC CAT ATT A -3’) (Simon et al. 1994).

This cox1 fragment is our standard “DNA barcoding” fragment for Dytiscidae, a short fragment of DNA used for preliminary species identification and study of population-level processes (see e.g. Hendrich and Balke 2009 and Hendrich et al. 2009). We used the cox1 fragment sequenced for the female holotype to obtain quantitative data for species recognition which we here suggest especially useful as we had no male specimens for study of male genital structures. The sequence was added to our database of Australian Dytiscidae (Hendrich et al. 2010), containing around 70% of the Australian fauna, including all Neobidessodes species (Hendrich et al. 2009). We ran neighbour joining analysis in PAUP* (Swofford 2002) using HKY85 as well as uncorrected p-distances. The Species Identifier module of Taxon DNA software was used to study sequence divergence in the dataset (Meier et al. 2006).

Codens

CLH

SAMA

ZSM

Results and discussion

DNA Sequencing

We obtained 450 bp 3’ cox 1 sequence (GenBank accession # FR733592). Ran against our 1400+ Australian cox1 sequence database, we find minimum uncorrected p-distances in SpeciesIdentifier of 10.15% (Limbodessus jundeensis Watts and Humphreys, 2003), followed by Neobidessodes samkrisi Hendrich & Balke, 2009, Neobidessodes thoracicus Hendrich & Balke, 2009 and Neobidessodes bilita (Watts, 1978) (10.37–10.39%) and e.g. Copelatus tenebrosus Régimbart, 1880 (10.59%). The neighbour joining analysis in PAUP* placed Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. as the sister of all other Neobidessodes. This is not necessarily the correct phylogenetic position of Neobidessodes darwiniensis, but indicates that the female studied here does not belong to any other known Neobidessodes, nor to any other species in our database.

Taxonomy

Neobidessodes is a genus with 10 species distributed in Australia (9 species) and New Guinea (1 species). All but two [the stygobitic Neobidessodes limestonensis (Watts and Humphreys, 2003) and Neobidessodes gutteridgei (Watts & Humphreys, 2003)] species have a more or less contrasting black/yellow surface. The basic pattern of these species includes various yellow or reddish spots. The median lobes are simple and very elongate, in ventral view strongly tapered or rounded at tip. The size of the species varies from 1.95 to 3.85 mm (see also Hendrich et al. 2009).

The new species was placed in Neobidessodes because of the following combination of characters: 1) body elongate oval; 2) basal pronotal striae sharply incised, not connected by a transverse groove; 3) elytra lacking basal striae and sutural striae; 4) epipleura lacking transverse carina; 5) head lacking cervical line and its foremargin not bordered; 6) prosternal process broad, distinctly excavated and marginated; 7) inner margin of both metacoxal wings strongly ridged; 8) hind margin of abdominal ventrites 3–5 without row of minor irregular dentate processes.

Checklist of Neobidessodes species

NSW; NT; QLD; VIC; WA; N; S.

Australia – epigean

Neobidessodes bilita (Watts, 1978) S QLD, NSW, VIC

Neobidessodes darwiniensis Hendrich & Balke, sp. n. NT

Neobidessodes denticulatus (Sharp, 1882) N WA, NT, QLD, NSW

Neobidessodes flavosignatus (Zimmermann, 1922) N WA, NT, N QLD

Neobidessodes grossus (Zimmermann, 1922) N WA, NT, N QLD

Neobidessodes mjobergi (Zimmermann, 1922) N WA, NT, N QLD

Neobidessodes thoracicus Hendrich & Balke, 2009 N WA, NT, N QLD

Australia – stygobitic

Neobidessodes gutteridgei (Watts & Humphreys, 2003) WA (Yilgarn)

Neobidessodes limestonensis (Watts & Humphreys, 2003) WA (Yilgarn)

New Guinea – epigean

Neobidessodes samkrisi Hendrich & Balke, 2009 West Papua, Merauke, Indonesia

Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:CAD876B9-A027-458D-88D1-47E4A239FFA7

http://www.species-id.net/wiki/Neobidessodes_darwiniensis

Figs 1 5, 6, 7

graphic file with name ZooKeys-079-011-g001.jpg

Figures 1–4. Habitus of 1 Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. (holotype, female) 2 Neobidessodes bilita (female) 3 Neobidessodes mjobergi and 4 Hydroglyphus godeffroyi (scale bar = 2.0 mm) (Photos: M. Balke, A. Riedel).

graphic file with name ZooKeys-079-011-g002.jpg

Figures 5–7. 5 Distribution of Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. in Northern Australia. 6–7 Habitat of Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n., Neobidessodes grossus, Neobidessodes mjobergi and Neobidessodes thoracicus, Northern Territory Kakadu Hwy, Harriet Creek at Hwy Crossing (NT 14) (Photos: L. Hendrich).

Type locality.

Rest pool, Harriet Creek at Kakadu Highway, 11 km NE Pine Creek, Northern Territory, Australia [13°45'04.63"S, 131°53.5531"E].

Type material.

Holotype: Female, “Australia: NT, Kakadu Hwy, Harriet Creek at Hwy Cross., 156m, 24.VIII.2006, 13.744816S, 131.897483E, L. & E. Hendrich leg. (NT 14)”; “DNA M. Balke 3821” [green printed label]; “HOLOTYPE Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. Hendrich & Balke 2010” [red printed label] (SAMA).

Description.

Measurements. TL = 1.95 mm, TL-H = 1.8 mm; MW = 1.0 mm.

Colour.

Antennae, palpi, head and most parts of pronotum reddish-brown, posterior angles of head, near eyes and base of pronotum in middle broadly dark brown. Elytron dark brown with some small vague yellow spots subbasally and subapically (Fig. 1). Ventral side, including legs and epipleura, reddish-brown, prosternal process and metacoxal plates somewhat darkened.

Sculpture and structure.

Elongate oval, sides well rounded. Maximum width at apical third of body. Segments of antennae short and stout. Head with relatively coarse punctures and strong microreticulation. Pronotum and elytron with rather dense, medium-sized punctures and weak to moderate microreticulation, finely pubescent. Pronotal striae deep and well marked, length almost 1/2 of that of pronotum, strongly incurved converging anteriad (Fig. 1). Elytra lacking basal and sutural striae. Underside with a few moderately large weak punctures at sides, midline of metaventrite with moderately dense smaller punctures. Metacoxal lines raised, well separated, weakly diverging anteriorly.

Male.

Unknown.

Female.

Pro- and mesotarsi simple. Inner edge of mesotibia nearly straight.

Affinities - DNA Sequence Data.

The 3’ cox1 sequence available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/FR733592. 1 indicates that the new species is rather distinctive, the closest uncorrected p-distances in our database were other Neobidessodes species (c. 10.37%) and Limbodessus jundeensis (10.15%).

Morphology.

The smallest species of the genus. On first view, the new species resembles in size and colour the common Hydroglyphus godeffroyi (Fig. 4) distributed all over northern Australia and New Caledonia, and can be easily overlooked in the field. When recognized as a Neobidessodes the new species is similar to Neobidessodes mjobergi (Fig. 3) in coloration and to Neobidessodes bilita (Watts, 1978) (Fig. 2) in size. From Neobidessodes mjobergi it can be separated by its more broadly oval body, the much smaller size (Neobidessodes mjobergi 2.55-2.65 mm) and unicolourus head, and from Neobidessodes bilita by the darker dorsal surface, the short and stout segments of antennae, the rounded, broadly oval body, and the unflanged subapical part of the elytra (Figs 1, 2). Furthermore, Neobidessodes bilita is a strictly south-eastern species with a disjunct distribution from southern Queensland to Victoria (Hendrich et al. 2009).

Etymology.

Named after the Darwin area in the Northern Territory; the specific epithet is an adjective in the nominative singular.

Distribution.

Only known from the type locality at Harriet Creek, 11 km NE Pine Creek but probably more widespread in the Northern Territory (Fig. 5).

Habitat.

The single specimen was collected in one of the rest pools of a rocky creek, with gloomy water and at least partly shaded by smaller gum trees. The bottom consisted of coarse sand with a thick layer of unrotten leaves and twigs, no submerged or emergent vegetation visible (Figs 6, 7).

Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. was associated with the dytiscids Clypeodytes larsoni Hendrich & Wang, 2006, Hydroglyphus daemeli (Sharp, 1882), Hydroglyphus godeffroyi, Hydroglyphus grammopterus (Zimmermann, 1928), Hyphydrus contiguus Wehncke, 1877, Hydroglyphus lyratus Swartz, 1808, Laccophilus cingulatus Sharp, 1882, Laccophilus sharpi Régimbart, 1889, Laccophilus walkeri J. Balfour-Browne, 1939, Limbodessus compactus (Clark, 1862), Neobidessodes grossus (Zimmermann, 1922), Neobidessodes mjobergi, Neobidessodes thoracicus Hendrich & Balke, 2009, Sternopriscus alligatorensis Hendrich & Watts, 2004, Sternopriscus aquilonaris Hendrich & Watts, 2004, Tiporus centralis (Watts, 1978), Tiporus guiliani (Watts, 1978) and Tiporus undecimmaculatus (Clark, 1862).

Remarks.

Despite the fact that thousands of Neobidessodes were collected on three field trips to the Northern Territory and the Kimberley region, surprisingly only one specimen of Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n. appeared. Most of the expeditions took place during the dry period, between June and October, when most of the other species of the genus dominate the remaining rest pools and swamps. We assume the new species is more common in or just after the rainy season, from November to April, as was observed for Neobidessodes grossus (Hendrich et al. 2009).

The key to epigean species of Neobidessodes in Hendrich et al. (2009) should be modified as follows:

1 Length > 3.7 mm. Elytron with a subapical lateral flange, pronotal striae very weak, N WA, NT, N QLD Neobidessodes grossus
Length < 3.7 mm 2
2 Elytron with a subapical lateral tooth, pronotal striae well marked, WA, NT, QLD, N NSW Neobidessodes denticulatus
Elytron lacking lateral tooth, pronotal striae present or absent 3
3 Pronotal striae absent 4
Pronotal striae present 5
4 Length 2.55–2.65 mm, outline of junction of pronotum and elytra smooth, sides of pronotum evenly curved, maximum width at posterior angles, dorsal colour pattern usually diffuse, N WA, NT, N QLD Neobidessodes mjobergi
Length 2.75–2.9 mm, outline of junction of pronotum and elytra slightly sinuate, maximum width of pronotum somewhat before base. Dorsal colour pattern strongly varying, when present, usually well marked. In some specimens pronotum yellow, in others pronotum and elytra all black, N WA, NT, N QLD Neobidessodes thoracicus
5 Dorsal colour pattern diffuse. Pronotal striae well marked and long (1/4 to 1/3 of length of pronotum) 6
Contrasting yellowish markings on black elytra. Pronotal striae only slightly marked and short (maximum 1/4 of length of pronotum) 7
6 Body elongate oval. Pronotum as broad as elytra, outline of junction of pronotum and elytra slightly sinuate, maximum width of pronotum somewhat before base (Fig. 2). Males with mesotibia curved, length 2.2–2.25 mm, VIC, NSW, S QLD Neobidessodes bilita
Body broader oval. Pronotum narrower than elytra, outline of junction of pronotum and elytra smooth, sides of pronotum evenly curved, maximum width at posterior angles (Fig. 1). Male unknown, length 1.95 mm, smallest species of the genus, NT Neobidessodes darwiniensis sp. n.
7 Males with mesotarsus straight. Pronotal striae well marked but short, small species, length 2.0 mm, West Papua, Indonesia Neobidessodes samkrisi
Males with mesotarsus straight. Pronotal striae extremely weak and faint, larger species, length 2.35–2.65 mm, N WA, NT, N QLD Neobidessodes flavosignatus

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Neobidessodes darwiniensis

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Hans Fery (Berlin, Germany), Chris Watts (Adelaide, Australia) and one additional, anonymous reviewer for improving an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank Gregor Hagedorn (Berlin, Germany) for stimulating discussions on species ID and the wiki format and the ZooKeys team for helping to implement our journal publication / wiki upload approach. The Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory, the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service in Darwin and the Kakadu National Park are thanked for giving permission to conduct scientific research in the Northern Territory (Permit Numbers: 23929 and RK- 400/ RK- 660). This work was supported by grants to Michael Balke: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BA 2152/4-1, 6-1 and 7-1), and to Lars Hendrich: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HE 5729/1-1).

References

  1. Hendrich L, Balke M. (2009) Kakadudessus tomweiri, a new genus and species of diving beetle from tropical northern Australia, based on molecular, phylogenetic and morphological data (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Bidessini). Zootaxa 2134:49-59 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hendrich L, Hawlitschek O, Balke M. (2009) The epigean Australasian species of Neobidessodes gen.n. diving beetles–a revision integrating morphology, cybertaxonomy, DNA taxonomy and phylogeny (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae, Bidessini). Zootaxa 2288:1-41 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hendrich L, Pons J, Ribera I, Balke M. (2010): Mitochondrial cox1 sequence data reliably uncover patterns of insect diversity but suffer from high lineage-idiosyncratic error rates. Plos ONE 5(12): e14448 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meier R, Kwong S, Vaidya G, Ng PKL. (2006) DNA Barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology 55:715-728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Michat MC, Alarie Y, Watts CHS. (2010) Descriptions of the first-instar larva of the hypogaeic species Neobidessodes limestoneensis (Watts & Humphreys) and of the third-instar larva of Hydroglyphus balkei Hendrich (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Bidessini) with phylogenetic considerations. Zootaxa 2658:38-50 [Google Scholar]
  6. Page RDM. (2010) Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia of life. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 10:343-349 [Google Scholar]
  7. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach AT, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87:651-701 [Google Scholar]
  8. Swofford DL. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Neobidessodes darwiniensis

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES