Skip to main content
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons logoLink to JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):247–250.

Laparoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of an Acute Epiploic Appendagitis with Torsion and Necrosis Causing an Acute Abdomen

JA Vázquez-Frias 2,, Pablo Castañeda 2, Salvador Valencia 2, Jorge Cueto 1,2
PMCID: PMC3113179  PMID: 10987404

Abstract

Acute epiploic appendagitis is not as rare as previously thought; but, since the presenting signs and symptoms are not specific, preoperative diagnosis has been rarely made. At the present time, a laparoscopic exploration of the peritoneal cavity will establish the correct diagnosis, and the treatment can be provided during the same procedure. Herein, a case of a 63-year-old female patient with acute abdominal syndrome caused by a necrotic epiploic appendix that was successfully diagnosed and treated laparoscopically is described. A review of the literature is made, as well.

Keywords: Acute epiploic appendagitis, Laparoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Epiploic appendages (EA) are composed of fat covered by serosa1 and have three morphologically different types: stalked appendices and others that are attached with their base in longitudinal and vertical direction to the colon axis.2 Although they are located throughout the colonic wall, occasionally they have also been found in the small bowel3,4 and in the parietal peritoneum.5 Their function is still controversial. Although little has been written about epiploic disorders (inflammation, torsion, necrosis, etc.), they occur more frequently than expected.6,7 Thus, they should be kept in mind.

CASE REPORT

A 63-year-old white female was admitted to the emergency room of the American British Cowdray Hospital of Mexico City complaining of severe colicky pain in the left lower quadrant and nausea for the last 24 hours. Her past medical history was unrewarding except for controlled hypothyroidism. At physical examination, the patient was tachycardic (110 beats per minute), and exquisite tenderness and rebound were found in the left lower quadrant. White blood cell count was 17,000 mm3, and the rest of the laboratory tests were within normal limits. Abdominal X-rays showed a dilated sigmoid colon, and a CT scan revealed no abnormalities. An emergency diagnostic laparoscopic procedure was performed under general endotracheal anesthesia. After establishing the pneumoperitoneum, a 10-mm 0° laparoscope was introduced through the umbilicus. The peritoneal cavity exploration revealed a dilated sigmoid colon with increased vascularity and scanty yellowish exudate in the left pelvic area. Two additional 5-mm ports were placed in the right lower quadrant and in the right flank, and intestinal forceps were used to manipulate gently the sigmoid colon. Immediately, a 2-cm twisted and ischemic epiploic appendix was observed in the antimesenteric border of an edematous segment of sigmoid colon approximately 12 cm proximal to the peritoneal reflection. Its pedicle was cauterized using a bipolar electrocautery, sectioned and finally retrieved in a zipper-type sterile plastic bag. The area was carefully irrigated and bupivacaine (30 mL; 0.45%) was instillated. The following morning, the patient passed flatus and tolerated a liquid diet. Surgical pathology revealed acute inflammation and fat necrosis of the epiploic appendix. She was discharged 48 hours later and remains asymptomatic 11 months later.

DISCUSSION

Acute inflammation, spontaneous torsion, fat necrosis, infarction, and calcification occur in the epiploic appendages, as well as enlargement due to lipomas, malignant tumors (including metastasis), and incarceration in hernias.1,811

The incidence of torsion and necrosis is almost impossible to estimate. Aronsky et al12 reported that abdominal fat tissue necrosis (including the omentum) occurs in 1.1% of patients with abdominal pain. Some authors have found the disease to be more common during the 4th and 5th decades of life,1,13 while others cannot find a preferred age group.6 A slight male preponderance has been described in a review by Carmichael and Organ.1 Primary epiploic appendagitis with subsequent necrosis is caused by torsion with compromise of its blood supply or by venous thrombosis of its draining system.12,14 It tends to occur in the sigmoid colon in more than 40% of the cases.12,15,16 Factors such as obesity and a narrow epiploic appendix base have been implicated in the etiology of torsion,1 whereas exertion has been related to events of venous thrombosis.17

Epiploic appendagitis has no specific manifestations.1820 Focal abdominal pain is the most important symptom, and, depending on the localization of the affected appendage, the clinical picture might resemble that of colonic diverticulitis, acute appendicitis, a gynecological disorder, or even acute cholecystitis.1,8,11,12,2123 As Shvetzov18 states referring to the torsion of an EA, “It occurs under the mask of other emergencies.” Abdulzhavadov24 describes “two new characteristic symptoms of this disease”: 1) pain appearing or intensifying when the abdomen is thrust forward and in mild tapping on the healthy side of the anterior abdominal wall with the fingertips, and 2) intensification of pain when the skin fold on the abdomen is pulled upward. This, of course, needs to be confirmed by others. Although pain is acute in most cases, Chatziioannou et al25 have reported a patient with abdominal pain of three weeks' duration that was caused by a necrotic EA. In the majority of patients, there are no other significant signs or symptoms, although nausea, vomiting, fever and a palpable mass have been mentioned frequently.1,15 Asymptomatic infarctions are sometime found incidentally as loose bodies at laparotomy performed for other reasons.1

Epiploic appendagitis has been, until recently, exceptionally diagnosed before laparotomy17,26,27 due to the fact that the clinical picture is non-specific and confusing.1,7,8,18,19,21 However, Shvetsov et al18 claim they have been able to diagnose two-thirds of their patients on clinical findings.

Laboratory tests are also non-specific and may reveal only a mild increase in the white blood cell count and rarely a shift to the left.12,15

Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) may suggest the diagnosis preoperatively.26 Characteristic US findings show a hyperechoic mass localized under the site of maximum pain, adjacent to the anterior peritoneal wall and fixed during breathing.7 CT may reveal “pathognomonic” signs such as a 1-4 cm pericolonic oval shaped lesion with fat density, bowel wall thickening or compression, thickened peritoneum and fat stranding.6,8,21,22 In the case herein presented, these findings were neither seen either preoperatively nor in a retrospective analysis with the radiologists. In spite of the aforementioned advances in imaging techniques, it would be reasonable to expect that most cases of epiploic appendagitis will continue to be diagnosed at laparotomy or laparoscopy.

The value of mini-invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal pain of unclear etiology is very well known.2834 As we and others have mentioned, by using the laparoscopic approach and a prolonged period of clinical observation, the incidence of perforation and unnecessary laparotomies can be reduced dramatically.28,35 This may result in a shortened hospital stay and decreased costs.35

Also, laparoscopy enables the surgeon to inspect the complete abdominal cavity, which is an advantage over a limited open access (eg, a small McBurney incision in suspected appendicitis).12,28 When CT suggests the diagnosis, some studies report successful conservative treatment (no surgery or antibiotics).6,22,36,37 However, CT follow-up is required, and pain is mentioned to resolve within days or up to four weeks. Again, this approach is difficult to recommend since many other patients with much more virulent pathologies may suffer serious septic complications if they are not operated promptly.9,18,35 It must be kept in mind that there are reports of pericolic abscesses and intestinal obstruction,38,39 massive bleeding,40 colon perforations9 and even fatalities19 in patients with complications of acute conditions of the epiploic appendages.

In conclusion, like many authors12,15,27,39 have stressed— and the case herein reported supports this approach— the feasibility, safety and efficacy of mini-invasive surgery is well established in the diagnosis and treatment of acute epiploic appendagitis.

References:

  • 1. Carmichael DH, Organ CH., Jr Epiploic disorders. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1167–1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hansen HH, Heine H. Blood supply and histophysiology of the appendices epiploicae. Lagenbecks Arch Chir. 1976;340:191–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mittal VK, Pierce AK, Priestley JC, et al. Infarcted small-bowel appendice epiploica: a cause of acute abdomen. Am J Proctol Gastroenterol Colon Rect Surg. 1981;32:23–24 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bundred NJ, Clason A, Eremin O. Torsion of an appendix epiploica of the small bowel. Br J Clin Pract. 1986;40:387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Polukhin SI, Letemin GG, Povorozniuk VS. Torsion of epiploic appendages of the parietal peritoneum. Vestn Khir Im II Grek. 1990;145:50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rioux M, Langis P. Primary epiploic appendagitis: clinical, US, and CT findings in 14 cases. Radiology. 1994;191:523–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Molla E, Ripolles T, Martinez MJ, Morote V, Rosello-Sastre E. Primary epiploic appendagitis: US and CT findings. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:435–438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ghahremani GG, White EM, Hoff FL, Gore RM, Miller JW, Christ ML. Appendices epiploicae of the colon: radiologic and pathologic features. Radiographics. 1992;12:59–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Metrevili VV, Gondzhilashvili GV, Kuzanov EI, Chkhikvadze TF. Acute diseases of the appendices epiploicae. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1989;(4):99–101 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ramdial PK, Singh B. Membranous fat necrosis in appendices epiploicae. A clinicopathological study. Virchows Arch. 1998;432:223–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Habib FA, McAleese P, Kolachalam RB. Laparoscopic approach to the management of incarcerated hernia of appendices epiploicae. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:425–428 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aronsky D, Z'graggen, Banz M, Klaiber C. Abdominal fat tissue necrosis as a cause of acute abdominal pain. Laparoscopic diagnosis and therapy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:737–740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fieber SS, Forman J. Appendices epiploicae: clinical and pathological considerations. Arch Surg. 1953;66:329–338 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Pines B, Rabinovitch J, Biller SB. Primary torsion and infarction of the appendices epiploicae. Arch Surg. 1941;42:775–787 [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mazza D, Fabiani P, Casaccia M, Baldini E, Gugenheim J, Mouiel J. A rare laparoscopic diagnosis in acute abdominal pain: torsion of epiploic appendix. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:456–458 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vlahakis E. Torsion of an appendix epiploica of the ascending colon. Med J Aust. 1973;2:1148–1149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brady SC, Kliman MR. Torsion of the greater omentum or appendices epiploicae. Can J Surg. 1979;22:79–82 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shvetsov SK, Bol'shakov IA. Torsion of the colonic epiploic appendages. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1992;2:76–80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shamblin JR, Payne CL, Soileau MK. Infarction of an epiploic appendix. South Med J. 1986;79:374–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. McGeer PL, McKenzie AD. Strangulation of the appendix epiploica: a series of 11 cases. Can J Surg. 1960;3:252–258 [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Wittemberg J, Warshaw AL. Misdiagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis. Am J Surg. 1998;176:81–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lambre H, Manzur R, Oxenghendler G, et al. Computed tomography of acute primary epiploic appendicitis. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 1998;28:337–338 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shirokikh VV. Torsion of an epiploic appendage of the trans-verse colon simulating acute cholecystitis. Vestn Khir. 1972;109:102–103 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Abdulzhavadov IM. The symptoms of diseases of the epiploic appendages of the large intestine. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1992. February;(2):80–83 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chatziioannou AN, Asimacopoulos PJ, Malone RS, Pneumaticos SG, Safi HJ. Torsion, necrosis, and inflammation of an epiploic appendix of the large bowel: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. South Med J. 1995;88:662–663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Levret N, Mokred K, Quevedo E, Barret F, Pouliquen X. Primary epiploic appendicitis. J Radiol. 1998;79:667–671 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Diaco JF, Diaco DS, Brannan AN. Endoscopic removal of an infarcted appendix epiploica. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993;3:149–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cueto J, Diaz O, Garteiz D, Rodríguez M, Weber A. The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis. Experience with 107 cases in Mexico City. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:366–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Memon MA, Fitzgibbons RJ., Jr The role of minimal access surgery in the acute abdomen. Surg Clin North Am. 1997,77:1333–1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chung RS, Diaz JJ, Chari V. Efficacy of routine laparoscopy for the acute abdomen. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:219–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Salky BA, Edye MB. The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:911–914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Navez B, Tassetti V, Scohy JJ, et al. Laparoscopic management of acute peritonitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:32–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cuesta MA, Eijsbouts QA, Gordijn RV, Borgstein PJ, de Jong D. Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with an acute abdomen of uncertain etiology. Surg Endosc. 1988;12:915–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Saeian K, Reddy KR. Diagnostic laparoscopy: an update. Endoscopy. 1999;31:103–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bruch HP, Schiedeck T. Abdominal pain of uncertain origin—value of laparoscopy. “If in doubt, carry it out.” Chirurg. 1997;68:12–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rao PM, Wittenberg J, Lawrason JN. Epiploic appendagitis: imaging evolution at CT. Radiology. 1997;204:713–717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. ter Meulen PH, Prakken WJ, Ooms HW. Epiploic appendicitis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999;143:159–161 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Romaniuk CS, Simpkins KC. Case report: pericolic abscess secondary to torsion of an appendix epiploica. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:216–217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Silva PD, Ripple J. Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of an infarcted epiploic appendage. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:325–327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Caironi C, Re S, Zanaboni M, Perucci C. A case of massive hemoperitoneum caused by spontaneous detachment of epiploic appendices. Minerva Chir. 1980;35:267–270 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons are provided here courtesy of Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons

RESOURCES