Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1986 Sep 11;14(17):6785–6801. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.17.6785

Echinomycin and distamycin induce rotation of nucleosome core DNA.

C M Low, H R Drew, M J Waring
PMCID: PMC311699  PMID: 3763391

Abstract

When nucleosome cores reconstituted from chicken erythrocyte histones and a 160 bp DNA molecule are exposed to echinomycin, a bis-intercalating antitumour antibiotic, the DNA appears to rotate with respect to the histone octamer by about half a turn. New bands appear in patterns of DNAase I digestion at positions approximately mid-way between those characteristic of control core samples, while the control pattern is largely suppressed. Similar (but not identical) changes are produced when nucleosome cores are exposed to distamycin, a non-intercalating DNA-binding antibiotic. The effects of both ligands can be explained in terms of a change in rotational orientation of the core DNA, so as to place antibiotic binding sites on the inward-facing (concave) surface of the DNA supercoil. Presumably this serves to optimise non-bonded contacts with the polynucleotide backbone. These results establish that the positioning of DNA about the histone octamer is not absolutely determined by its nucleotide sequence, but may be modified by the binding of such relatively small molecules as antibiotics.

Full text

PDF
6788

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnott S., Chandrasekaran R., Hall I. H., Puigjaner L. C. Heteronomous DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jun 25;11(12):4141–4155. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.12.4141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drew H. R. Structural specificities of five commonly used DNA nucleases. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jul 15;176(4):535–557. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 1985 Dec 20;186(4):773–790. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90396-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):491–502. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90379-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drew H. R., Travers A. A. Structural junctions in DNA: the influence of flanking sequence on nuclease digestion specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Jun 25;13(12):4445–4467. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.12.4445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fox K. R., Waring M. J. DNA structural variations produced by actinomycin and distamycin as revealed by DNAase I footprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 21;12(24):9271–9285. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.24.9271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fratini A. V., Kopka M. L., Drew H. R., Dickerson R. E. Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG. J Biol Chem. 1982 Dec 25;257(24):14686–14707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kopka M. L., Yoon C., Goodsell D., Pjura P., Dickerson R. E. Binding of an antitumor drug to DNA, Netropsin and C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-BrC-G-C-G. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jun 25;183(4):553–563. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Low C. M., Drew H. R., Waring M. J. Sequence-specific binding of echinomycin to DNA: evidence for conformational changes affecting flanking sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jun 25;12(12):4865–4879. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.12.4865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCall M., Brown T., Kennard O. The crystal structure of d(G-G-G-G-C-C-C-C). A model for poly(dG).poly(dC). J Mol Biol. 1985 Jun 5;183(3):385–396. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ramsay N., Felsenfeld G., Rushton B. M., McGhee J. D. A 145-base pair DNA sequence that positions itself precisely and asymmetrically on the nucleosome core. EMBO J. 1984 Nov;3(11):2605–2611. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02181.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richmond T. J., Finch J. T., Rushton B., Rhodes D., Klug A. Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 A resolution. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):532–537. doi: 10.1038/311532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ughetto G., Wang A. H., Quigley G. J., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Rich A. A comparison of the structure of echinomycin and triostin A complexed to a DNA fragment. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 11;13(7):2305–2323. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.7.2305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Dyke M. M., Dervan P. B. Echinomycin binding sites on DNA. Science. 1984 Sep 14;225(4667):1122–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.6089341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Van Dyke M. W., Hertzberg R. P., Dervan P. B. Map of distamycin, netropsin, and actinomycin binding sites on heterogeneous DNA: DNA cleavage-inhibition patterns with methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(18):5470–5474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang A. H., Fujii S., van Boom J. H., Rich A. Molecular structure of the octamer d(G-G-C-C-G-G-C-C): modified A-DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(13):3968–3972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.13.3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang A. H., Ughetto G., Quigley G. J., Hakoshima T., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Rich A. The molecular structure of a DNA-triostin A complex. Science. 1984 Sep 14;225(4667):1115–1121. doi: 10.1126/science.6474168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Waring M. J. DNA modification and cancer. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:159–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Waring M. J., Wakelin L. P. Echinomycin: a bifunctional intercalating antibiotic. Nature. 1974 Dec 20;252(5485):653–657. doi: 10.1038/252653a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES