Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1992 Mar 11;20(5):1017–1022. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.5.1017

Histone acetylation and globin gene switching.

T R Hebbes 1, A W Thorne 1, A L Clayton 1, C Crane-Robinson 1
PMCID: PMC312085  PMID: 1549462

Abstract

An affinity-purified antibody that recognises the epitope epsilon-acetyl lysine has been used to fractionate chicken erythrocyte mononucleosomes obtained from 5 and 15 day embryos. The antibody bound chromatin was enriched in multiply acetylated forms of the core histones H3, H4 and H2B, but not in ubiquitinated H2A. The DNA of these modified nucleosomes was probed with genomic sequences from the embryonic beta rho gene (active at 5 days) and from the adult beta A gene (active at 15 days). Both genes were found to be highly enriched in the acetylated nucleosomes fractionated from both 5 day and from 15 day erythrocytes. We conclude that globin switching is not linked to a change in acetylation status of the genes and that a 'poised' gene carries histones acetylated to a similar level as a transcriptionally active gene. Core histone acetylation is not therefore a direct consequence of the transcriptional process and might operate at the level of the globin locus as a general enabling step for transcription.

Full text

PDF
1017

Images in this article

1019Image
on p.1019
1020Image
on p.1020
1021Image
on p.1021

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allegra P., Sterner R., Clayton D. F., Allfrey V. G. Affinity chromatographic purification of nucleosomes containing transcriptionally active DNA sequences. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 20;196(2):379–388. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90698-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bird A. P. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986 May 15;321(6067):209–213. doi: 10.1038/321209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bonner W. M., West M. H., Stedman J. D. Two-dimensional gel analysis of histones in acid extracts of nuclei, cells, and tissues. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Aug;109(1):17–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman B. S., Tobin A. J. Distribution of developmentally regulated hemoglobins in embryonic erythroid populations. Dev Biol. 1979 Apr;69(2):375–387. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen T. A., Allfrey V. G. Rapid and reversible changes in nucleosome structure accompany the activation, repression, and superinduction of murine fibroblast protooncogenes c-fos and c-myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5252–5256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Csordas A. On the biological role of histone acetylation. Biochem J. 1990 Jan 1;265(1):23–38. doi: 10.1042/bj2650023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dawson B. A., Herman T., Haas A. L., Lough J. Affinity isolation of active murine erythroleukemia cell chromatin: uniform distribution of ubiquitinated histone H2A between active and inactive fractions. J Cell Biochem. 1991 Jun;46(2):166–173. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240460210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorbic T., Wittig B. Chromatin from transcribed genes contains HMG17 only downstream from the starting point of transcription. EMBO J. 1987 Aug;6(8):2393–2399. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02517.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dorbic T., Wittig B. Isolation of oligonucleosomes from active chromatin using HMG17-specific monoclonal antibodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Apr 25;14(8):3363–3376. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.8.3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90554-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gross D. S., Garrard W. T. Nuclease hypersensitive sites in chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:159–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grunstein M. Histone function in transcription. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:643–678. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hebbes T. R., Thorne A. W., Crane-Robinson C. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J. 1988 May;7(5):1395–1402. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02956.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hebbes T. R., Turner C. H., Thorne A. W., Crane-Robinson C. A "minimal epitope" anti-protein antibody that recognises a single modified amino acid. Mol Immunol. 1989 Sep;26(9):865–873. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(89)90143-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hesse J. E., Nickol J. M., Lieber M. R., Felsenfeld G. Regulated gene expression in transfected primary chicken erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(12):4312–4316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamakaka R. T., Thomas J. O. Chromatin structure of transcriptionally competent and repressed genes. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(12):3997–4006. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07621.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kayne P. S., Kim U. J., Han M., Mullen J. R., Yoshizaki F., Grunstein M. Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):27–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landes G. M., Martinson H. G. Transcriptional properties of chick embryonic erythroid nuclei in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 25;257(18):11002–11007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Landes G. M., Villeponteau B., Pribyl T. M., Martinson H. G. Hemoglobin switching in chickens. Is the switch initiated post-transcriptionally? J Biol Chem. 1982 Sep 25;257(18):11008–11014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levinger L., Varshavsky A. Selective arrangement of ubiquitinated and D1 protein-containing nucleosomes within the Drosophila genome. Cell. 1982 Feb;28(2):375–385. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90355-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Libertini L. J., Small E. W. Salt induced transitions of chromatin core particles studied by tyrosine fluorescence anisotropy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Aug 25;8(16):3517–3534. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.16.3517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathew C. G., Goodwin G. H., Johns E. W. Studies on the association of the high mobility group non-histone chromatin proteins with isolated nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jan;6(1):167–179. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.1.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nacheva G. A., Guschin D. Y., Preobrazhenskaya O. V., Karpov V. L., Ebralidse K. K., Mirzabekov A. D. Change in the pattern of histone binding to DNA upon transcriptional activation. Cell. 1989 Jul 14;58(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90399-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nickel B. E., Allis C. D., Davie J. R. Ubiquitinated histone H2B is preferentially located in transcriptionally active chromatin. Biochemistry. 1989 Feb 7;28(3):958–963. doi: 10.1021/bi00429a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nickol J. M., Felsenfeld G. Bidirectional control of the chicken beta- and epsilon-globin genes by a shared enhancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2548–2552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Norton V. G., Imai B. S., Yau P., Bradbury E. M. Histone acetylation reduces nucleosome core particle linking number change. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):449–457. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90920-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Norton V. G., Marvin K. W., Yau P., Bradbury E. M. Nucleosome linking number change controlled by acetylation of histones H3 and H4. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19848–19852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pantazis P., Bonner W. M. Quantitative determination of histone modification. H2A acetylation and phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1981 May 10;256(9):4669–4675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Postnikov Y. V., Shick V. V., Belyavsky A. V., Khrapko K. R., Brodolin K. L., Nikolskaya T. A., Mirzabekov A. D. Distribution of high mobility group proteins 1/2, E and 14/17 and linker histones H1 and H5 on transcribed and non-transcribed regions of chicken erythrocyte chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 25;19(4):717–725. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.4.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ridsdale J. A., Davie J. R. Chicken erythrocyte polynucleosomes which are soluble at physiological ionic strength and contain linker histones are highly enriched in beta-globin gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1081–1096. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stalder J., Larsen A., Engel J. D., Dolan M., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Tissue-specific DNA cleavages in the globin chromatin domain introduced by DNAase I. Cell. 1980 Jun;20(2):451–460. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90631-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stollar B. D., Ward M. Rabbit antibodies to histone fractions as specific reagents for preparative and comparative studies. J Biol Chem. 1970 Mar 25;245(6):1261–1266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sturgeon P., Hill M. K., Kwak K. S. A fully automated method for immunochemical quantitation by passive hemolysis inhibition. Immunochemistry. 1969 Sep;6(5):689–697. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(67)90133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tazi J., Bird A. Alternative chromatin structure at CpG islands. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):909–920. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90339-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thorne A. W., Kmiciek D., Mitchelson K., Sautiere P., Crane-Robinson C. Patterns of histone acetylation. Eur J Biochem. 1990 Nov 13;193(3):701–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thorne A. W., Sautiere P., Briand G., Crane-Robinson C. The structure of ubiquitinated histone H2B. EMBO J. 1987 Apr;6(4):1005–1010. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04852.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Turner B. M. Histone acetylation and control of gene expression. J Cell Sci. 1991 May;99(Pt 1):13–20. doi: 10.1242/jcs.99.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Turner B. M., O'Neill L. P., Allan I. M. Histone H4 acetylation in human cells. Frequency of acetylation at different sites defined by immunolabeling with site-specific antibodies. FEBS Lett. 1989 Aug 14;253(1-2):141–145. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80947-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weintraub H. Histone-H1-dependent chromatin superstructures and the suppression of gene activity. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90522-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu C. The 5' ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature. 1980 Aug 28;286(5776):854–860. doi: 10.1038/286854a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES