Abstract
Patterns of expressed genes examined in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of seropositive persons electing to stop antiretroviral therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5170 were scrutinized to identify markers capable of predicting the likelihood of CD4+ T-cell depletion after cessation of antiretroviral therapy (ART). A5170 was a multicenter, 96-week, prospective study of HIV-infected patients with immunological preservation on ART who elected to interrupt therapy. Study entry required that the CD4 count was greater than 350 cells/mm3 within 6 months of ART initiation. Median nadir CD4 count of enrollees was 436 cells/mm3. Two cohorts, matched for clinical characteristics, were selected from A5170. Twenty-four patients with an absolute CD4 cell decline of less that 20% at week 24 (good outcome group) and 24 with a CD4 cell decline of >20% (poor outcome group) were studied. The good outcome group had a decline in CD4+ T-cell count that was 50% less than the poor outcome group. Significance analysis of microarrays identified differential gene expression (DE) in the two groups in data obtained from Affymetrix Human FOCUS GeneChips. DE was significantly higher in the poor outcome group than in the good outcome group. Prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM-R) identified genes that classified persons as to progression with greater than 80% accuracy at therapy interruption (TI) as well as at 24 weeks after TI. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified a set of genes in the Ras signaling pathway, associated with the downregulation of apoptosis, as significantly upregulated in the good outcome group at cessation of ART. These observations identify specific host cell processes associated with differential outcome in this cohort after TI.
Introduction
The Lifesaving Advantages Of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) are evident. So too are the challenges faced by persons who fail therapy, experience significant adverse side effects from treatment, or suffer treatment fatigue. As more is learned about ART and treatment modalities evolve, persons who initiated ART under previous guidelines to “hit early and hit hard” would not currently be placed on ART.1,2 At the other end of the spectrum are persons whose treatment options are crucially narrowed due to multidrug resistance or drug-related toxicities. Several studies have evaluated therapy interruption (TI) in closely monitored clinical trials involving primarily chronically infected persons on sustained ART with stable suppression of viremia and preserved CD4+ T-cell counts (generally above 350 cells/μl).3–7 In addition to possibly alleviating the significant clinical side effects and other burdens of prolonged ART, TI was initially postulated to induce the emergence of a more drug-sensitive virus (wild type) in persons with multidrug resistance8,9 or in an increase in HIV-specific immunity following cycles of TI.10–13 Enhanced HIV-specific immune response, mediated by the expansion of CD8+ T cells, was postulated to enhance T-cell turnover rates14 and speed of viral clearance,11 lower viral set point, and/or to delay viral rebound, even if temporarily.7,12,15
Encouraging observations reporting modest association between increased HIV-specific CD8+ memory cells and suppression of viral replication in the earliest trials of TI16,17 involving small numbers of persons were discounted as the preponderance of evidence from larger studies in chronically infected persons with several rounds of TI of varying duration failed to define clear benefits of TI.5–7,12,13,15,18–20 TI in acute or early HIV infection was associated with similar viral rebound.10,21 Explanations for these observations include the failure of the transient and modest HIV-specific immunity and the associated expansion of CD8+ T cells generated by TI to generate an effective long-term control of viral replication.11,12,15 Additionally, reservoirs of persistent replication competent virus may be preserved even during sustained ART and emerge during TI.10,13,15 Concomitant with viral rebound following TI, drug-resistant variants may emerge.22
Transient increases in CD4+ T cells, modest expansion of viral-specific immunity, the fleeting emergence of wild-type virus, and some association with a temporarily lowered rate of clinical progression are seen after TI in some studies. However, the repercussions of viral rebound and the inability of the TI-associated immune response to result in a substantial and durable reduction in viral set point make the use of TI untenable in the clinical management of seropositive persons.23 The SMART study, the largest interventional study conducted in HIV-seropositive persons, recently revealed that TIs are associated with a significant increase in risk of morbidity and mortality from events, many cardiovascular in nature, not previously considered to be HIV-associated and suggested that there was no benefit associated with TI in any subpopulation of patients in the study.24
Nevertheless, in the context of research to identify correlates of disease progression, samples derived from TI clinical studies have the potential to provide critical information on the performance and utility of the gold standard correlates of HIV disease progression, such as CD4+ T-cell levels, viral load, and definitive clinical endpoints, as they can be assessed dynamically, in the short term, and in the context of extensive clinical evaluation. Importantly, these well-documented clinical studies also offer the opportunity to evaluate new and novel approaches to the assessment of risk of disease progression. The identification of biomarkers, in turn, builds the collection of tools for the assessment of both drug interventions for the control of HIV disease and the performance of vaccines for the prevention of HIV disease.
We studied samples from persons enrolled in a TI trial, ACTG 5170, which determined that the incidence of clinical endpoints was reduced and that the time to these endpoints was prolonged in persons with higher CD4+-cell nadir on ART, lower viral loads prior to ART, and a viral load below detection at TI.6 We sought to determine if patterns of gene expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) compartment, a type of sample consistently and easily available from clinical studies, might be correlated with the course of disease upon TI. Our findings identified specific host-cell processes in the PBMC compartment that are associated with differential outcome after TI.
Materials and Methods
Clinical specimens
PBMCs were obtained with informed consent from study volunteers enrolled in ACTG 5170, a multicenter clinical trial approved by local human use institutional review boards. Eligibility criteria for ACTG 5170 included confirmed HIV-1 infection, age > 12, CD4 count > 350 cells/mm3 immediately prior to first ART, CD4 count > 350 cells/mm3, plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load < 55,000 copies/ml at screening, currently receiving ART with ≥2 drugs for ≥6 months, and Karnofsky score ≥70.6
A5170 was a multicenter, 96-week, prospective study of HIV-infected patients with immunological preservation on ART who elected to interrupt therapy. Study entry required that the CD4 count was greater than 350 cells/mm3 within 6 months of ART initiation. Median nadir CD4 count of enrollees was 436 cells/mm3. Two cohorts, matched for clinical characteristics, were selected from A5170. Twenty-four patients with an absolute CD4 cell decline of less that 20% at week 24 (good outcome group) and 24 with a CD4 cell decline of >20% (poor outcome group) were studied. The good outcome group had a decline in CD4+ T-cell count that was 50% less than the poor outcome group. The good outcome group never reinitiated ART over the course of the study while nine persons in the poor outcome group reinitiated ART at a CD4+ T-cell decline of >40%. PBMCs were collected by Histopaque-Ficoll (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) gradient centrifugation and were cryopreserved. Samples were assessed for gene expression patterns at the time of cessation of ART (week 0 in our study) and at 24 weeks after TI.
Standard measures of disease progression
The Roche Amplicor HIV Monitor test (version 1.5: Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was used to determine plasma viral load.
Peripheral blood lymphocyte subset analysis was performed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using a panel of mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies according to the manufacturer.
Gene expression profile analysis using Affymetrix GeneChips
Preparation of cellular RNA and subsequent processing for GeneChip analysis were performed as described previously25 using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) to assess the integrity and quantity of RNA and the Affymetrix Human Focus GeneChip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). This platform consists of 8700 probe sets and assesses 8500 transcripts for 8400 full-length and fully annotated genes.
GeneChips with a scaling factor greater than 50 and an array outlier percentage greater than 5% on dCHIP200526 were eliminated from further analysis. CEL files were normalized at the probe level using the robust multichip average method27 built into the BioConductor package Affy-1.12.2. Genes scored as absent in all 96 samples were eliminated from analysis.
The Affymetrix datasets used to derive the observations discussed in this article can be accessed at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ under the accession numbers: GSE 10924.
Gene expression data analysis methods
Differentially expressed genes were identified by using the statistical program Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) version 3.028 and cluster analysis of microarray datasets was performed using MultiExperiment Viewer available at http://www.tigr.org/software/microarray.shtml. SAM identifies genes whose expression has significantly changed by leveraging a set of gene-specific t tests. Genes are assigned a score derived from the change in expression relative to the standard deviation for all measurements made for that gene. Genes that exceed a threshold are scored as statistically significant. The percentage of genes being called significant by chance is measured by false discovery rate (FDR). We used a cutoff of FDR < 1% for SAM, which is very stringent.
The functions and biological classifications of differentially expressed genes were analyzed by the web-based tool, DAVID, which sorts gene lists into functional profiles using broad gene ontology categories by associated biological processes.29 Ontology groupings for genes overlap by nature of the fact that the products of genes may have multiple functions.
Class prediction was performed using an academic software package, Prediction Analysis of Microarray with R (PAM-R), which implemented the nearest shrunken centroid algorithm.30 The software provides a k-fold cross-validation method to estimate the predicting capability of the resultant classifier set of genes. PAM-R is available at http://www.bioconductor.org. PAM-R is an iterative analytical method that uses sets of individual genes, called classifier sets, that together are capable of assigning samples to a given group.
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) or R-GSEA and MSigDB (Molecular Signatures DataBase of gene sets) were used to identify differentially expressed sets of genes. Both the software and geneset database were downloaded from the website of The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (http://www.broad.mit.edu). GSEA identifies sets of related genes, as opposed to individual genes, associated with biological pathways that are coregulated and are associated with progression after TI in our study. We used GSEA's default statistical cutoff FDR < 0.25.
Independent confirmation of GeneChip expression data
To confirm observations from the gene chip data, Taq-Man® Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) optimized for microarray validation (3′ most) were used to detect NFKB1, RELA, RAF1, and PIK3CA in three randomly chosen, matched sets of good and poor outcome samples. The fluorescence signals were measured in real time using ABI HT7900 and critical threshold (CT) values were output from the software SDS2.1. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as internal control to calculate fold changes of target genes in good versus poor outcome samples by the 2−∆∆CT method.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study group
There were 96 samples in the study set. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the good and poor outcome groups at week 0 (at cessation of ART) and 24 weeks later. The drop in CD4+ T cells in the samples in the good outcome group was 50% less than the corresponding matched sample in the poor outcome group. The good outcome group was characterized by a mean loss of 123.23 cells over the study period, and the poor outcome group by a mean loss of 401.17 cells (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 1.22 × 10−7). At study entry, the two groups had no significant difference in plasma viral load, CD4+ T-cell levels, or age. At week 24, there was a significant difference between the two groups in CD4+ T cells, viral load, and the mean change in both these parameters since study entry. The groups do not differ in gender or race as 94% were male, 6% female and 67% were Caucasian, 19% were African-American, 10% Hispanic, and 4% Asian/Pacific Islander. There was no significant difference in the ART history in the two groups (data not shown). Principal component analysis indicated that expression profiles of samples in the poor outcome group taken at weeks 4, 12, 16, and 32 were not outliers.
Table 1.
Descriptive Statistics for the Study Groups
| Statistic | Good outcome group (n = 24) | Poor outcome group (n = 24)a | p values |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD4 cells at week 0 | 798.35 ± 224.30 | 900.71 ± 236.46 | 0.146 |
| CD4 cells at week 24 | 675.13 ± 212.31 | 499.54 ± 165.45 | 4.00 × 10−3 |
| Delta CD4 cells | −123.23 ± 127.31 | −401.17 ± 204.05 | 1.22 × 10−7 |
| Viral load at week 0 | 1.716 ± 0.064 | 1.726 ± 0.067 | 0.157 |
| Viral load at week 24 | 3.467 ± 0.832 | 4.432 ± 0.828 | 5.96 × 10−4 |
| Delta viral load | 1.716 ± 0.856 | 2.705 ± 0.817 | 6.43 × 10−4 |
| Gender | 23 M/1F | 22 M/2 F | |
| Age | 41.50 ± 8.85 | 41.00 ± 6.71 | 0.650 |
Values are the mean ± the standard deviation. p values were determined using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Viral load is expressed as log10 copies of viral RNA per milliliter of plasma. Values of viral load below the assay cut off of 50 copies were scored as 50 copies. CD4+ T-cell levels are expressed as number of cells per milliliter.
Clinical data for two of the samples in the poor outcome group were taken at week 12 and 16 and for one of the samples in this group at week 4. GeneChip data was within 6–8 weeks of the clinical data. One sample in the poor outcome group had both clinical and GeneChip data from week 32.
Differential gene expression is associated with progression after the cessation of ART
SAM using study entry (week 0) as baseline, with an FDR of 1%, was used to identify genes that exhibited a significant change in expression level over the 24-week study period. Differentially expressed (DE) genes were annotated using the DAVID database to determine significantly enriched gene ontology (GO) functional categories with a cutoff p value of 0.05. The complete list of differentially expressed genes is given in the Appendix.
More differential expression was observed in the poor outcome group over the study period than in the good outcome group at an FDR of 1%. Figure 1 is a heat map showing the upregulation of 133 genes and the downregulation of 208 genes in the poor outcome group over the 24-week period. Also shown are the remarkably few genes, 51 upregulated and no significantly downregulated genes, whose expression was significantly changed over the study period in the good outcome group. Corresponding GO functional categories are also shown. Genes associated with response to viral infection were among those upregulated. The DE genes that were downregulated at week 24 were dominated by those associated with biosynthesis and metabolism.
FIG. 1.
Differential gene expression at 24 weeks after cessation of ART. (A) Differential expression in poor outcome group. There were 133 genes upregulated and 208 genes downregulated at significant level of false discovery rate (FDR) < 1%. On the left is a heat map showing the magnitudes of gene expression changes (see Supplementary Table 1 for expression values of each gene in each sample). Gene ontology (GO) categories of these 133 up- and 208 downregulated genes are shown on the right. Only categories whose p values are less than 0.05 are listed. The p values of each GO category were determined by the online tool, DAVID. (B) Differential expression in the good outcome group. Unlike the poor outcome group, the number of differentially expressed genes in the good outcome group was much less. There were only 51 genes upregulated from week 0 to week 24 at FDR < 1% significant level, and no genes downregulated at FDR < 1% significant level.
In the good outcome group, 51 genes were differentially expressed over the study period and none were downregulated. Genes associated with response to viral infection and cellular defense predominated the set of upregulated genes in the good outcome group.
Figure 2 displays a Venn diagram of the differences and similarities between DE in the good and poor outcome groups in genes that are upregulated over the 24-week period. There were 15 genes that were upregulated and were unique to the good outcome group. Thirty-six upregulated genes were observed in both outcome groups, and 97 upregulated genes were unique to the poor outcome group. The major functional categories that comprise the upregulated genes shared by both groups were those associated with response to virus (five genes) and with cellular defense response (four genes). Functional categories unique to the poor outcome group included apoptosis, inflammatory response, and the positive regulation of programmed cell death, and those associated with catabolism were uniquely upregulated in the good outcome group.
FIG. 2.
Survey of the distribution of genes significantly upregulated in the poor and good outcome groups. The numbers of genes in the ontological groups as determined by DAVID are given as well as the associated p values for each. Common to both groups were genes associated with viral infection. Distinct in the poor and good outcome groups were genes associated with catabolism and in the poor group were those associated with apoptosis, programmed cell death, and progression through the cell cycle.
DE of sets of genes is capable of classifying patients as to progression after the cessation of ART with greater than 80% accuracy
PAM-R was used to leverage a 10-fold cross-validation method to identify sets of classifier genes capable of sorting samples into good and poor outcome groups. Figure 3(A) and (B) show the results of PAM-R at study entry and week 24, respectively. The graph in Fig. 3(A) shows that, leveraging the expression of a distinct set of genes, samples can be assigned to the good or poor group with an overall accuracy of 81% at study entry. The resolution of the assignment of samples to the two groups increased significantly by 24 weeks, shown in Fig. 3(B), as indicated by the increase in the separation of the probability of assignment to the correct group shown on the ordinate. Figure 4(A) and (B) show pie charts of the known functional categories of the 53 genes comprising the 81% accurate classifier set at study entry and the 176 genes comprising the 83% accurate classifier set at week 24.
FIG. 3.
Classification analysis for outcome at week 0 and at week 24 after the cessation of antiretroviral therapy. (A) Prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM-R) analysis of classification and prediction at week 0 showing an 81% accuracy in classification by the 53 genes in the classifier set. (B) PAM-R analysis of classification and prediction at week 24 showing an 83% accuracy in classification by the 176 genes in the classifier set. The x-axis (numbers 1 through 48) shows the patients in the analysis with numbers 1–24 belonging to the good outcome group and numbers 25–48 to the poor outcome group. For each patient, there are two symbols. A triangle indicates the probability, shown on the y-axis, of a patient being predicted to belonging in the good outcome group, and a cross indicates the probability of the same patient being predicted as belonging to the poor outcome group. If a triangle is above a cross, the patient is classified as belonging to the good outcome group and conversely, if a cross is above a triangle, the patient is classified as belonging to the poor outcome group. For a given patient, the sum of all probabilities is always equal to 1.
FIG. 4.
Functional categories of genes comprising the classification sets at week 0 and at week 24. (A) Pie chart of those functional categories in the classifier set at week 0 that were annotated by DAVID at biological process level 5. Genes associated with progression through the cell cycle are included. (B) Pie chart of those functional categories in the classifier set at week 24 that were annotated by DAVID. Genes associated with the regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle predominated. Only genes with p value of < 0.05 are shown.
Of the genes in the 53 gene classifier set at study entry that can be annotated by DAVID and have a p value of less than 0.05, genes associated with the regulation of progression through the cell cycle were observed. In the 176 gene classifier set at week 24, genes associated with the regulation of apoptosis and progression through the cell cycle dominate and those associated with the immune response, viral infection, and proliferation are also represented.
High-resolution gene set enrichment analysis identified genes in the Ras pathway that are specifically associated with the downregulation of apoptosis and that are differentially enriched in samples from patients with good outcome
High-resolution gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify sets of genes known as “core enrichment genes,” which are differentially expressed at week 0, the point of cessation of ART. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 5(A) and (B). Figure 5(A) displays a heat map showing the expression of the set of core enrichment genes in the Ras family that were identified by GSEA as being upregulated in the good outcome group. The Ras genes identified by GSEA were associated with the modulation of apoptosis. The functional pathway of these genes is shown in Fig. 5(B). The expression of genes whose annotations are shown in red ink in Fig. 5(B) were independently confirmed by reverse-transcriptase (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
FIG. 5.
Gene set enhancement analysis and identification of genes in the Ras signaling pathway associated with the regulation of apoptosis at week 0. (A). Heat map showing the differential expression of genes in the Ras signaling pathway in the two outcome groups. (B) Network of Ras signaling pathway genes identified by gene set enrichment analysis. The expression of genes whose annotations are given in red ink was independently confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. ERK 1/2, extracellular signal regulated kinase; Ras, Regulator GTPase, rat sarcoma viral oncogene; PIK3 CA, phosphatidylinositol e kinase catalytic subunit A isoform; RAC1, Ras-related botulinum toxin substrate 1; PIP3 phosphoinositide binding protein 3; RAF1, vraf 1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1; NFKB1, nuclear factor of kappa light polpeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1; RELA, vref reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A.
Real-time PCR confirmed the expression of the genes in the Ras pathway that were upregulated in the good outcome group
Table 2 summarizes the confirmation by RT PCR of the DE in randomly chosen, matched samples from the good and poor outcome groups at the time of cessation of ART and identified by the expression data as genes associated with the regulation of apoptosis in the Ras signaling pathway. The correlation coefficient for the concordance of these two independent means of deriving the data was r = 0.93.
Table 2.
RT-PCR Confirmation of the Upregulation of Ras Signaling Pathway in Good Outcome Group at Week 0
|
PIK3CA |
RAF1 |
NFKB1 |
RELA |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | GeneChip | RT-PCR | GeneChip | RT-PCR | GeneChip | RT-PCR | GeneChip |
| 1.89 | 1.54 | 1.43 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 1.29 | 1.12 |
| 3.33 | 4.91 | 1.00 | 1.86 | 1.89 | 2.24 | 1.63 | 2.11 |
| 4.06 | 4.25 | 2.03 | 2.46 | 5.00 | 5.28 | 1.86 | 1.37 |
Values in the table are the fold changes of good versus matched poor samples. For each gene, the left column is fold change detected by RT-PCR and the right column is fold changes measured by GeneChip in three sets of samples. Correlation coefficient of GeneChip and RT-PCR data is 0.93. The fold change was calculated by 2−∆∆CT method using GAPDH as internal control. RT, reverse-transcriptase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Discussion
The goal of this study was to ascertain if, prior to ART interruption, distinct patterns of gene expression might be associated with disease progression or outcome in persons who stop ART. A second goal of the study was to use these patterns to identify biological and cellular processes that might account for such an association. Clearly, the good and poor outcome groups were indistinguishable by demographic and traditional clinical features at the time of cessation of ART (week 0) and were by week 24 significantly divergent in clinical status. Accordingly, there are definitive patterns of gene expression associated with the two groups at week 24. Although this might be expected after clinical progression has occurred, the observation that gene expression patterns that are associated with outcome at week 24 can be identified at week 0 is highly significant.
Genes associated with apoptosis are shown by the three levels of analysis used in our study to be indicative of differential outcome. SAM analysis indicates that these genes are uniquely upregulated by week 24 in the poor outcome group. The more stringent classification analysis indicates that by week 24, genes associated with the regulation of apoptosis are represented in the 176 genes capable of classification of samples into two divergent groups with an accuracy of 83%. Classification analysis also indicates that there are patterns of gene expression that are capable of distinguishing the two groups at week 0. The analysis presented in Fig. 3(A and B) is critical for several reasons in that: (1) it demonstrates the degree to which expression profiles can distinguish differential outcome after TI and 24 weeks later and (2) it shows that such profiles can distinguish differential outcome as early as study entry when the traditional markers of CD4+ T-cell levels and viral load are indistinguishable. In addition, this analysis provides the collection of genes that drive the prediction of outcome and that include those associated with the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis as shown in Fig. 4(A and B). These data prompted the GSEA, which confirmed and extended the identification of the modulation of apoptosis as the underlining functional pathway that distinguished good and poor outcome persons.
The extensive scrutiny of gene expression at week 0 by GSEA identified a set of genes, as opposed to individual genes, that are associated with the regulation of apoptosis in the Ras signaling pathway. Independent confirmation of the differential expression data generated by gene chip analysis, using RT-PCR in both good and poor outcome samples, further substantiated the pivotal role of this gene family in disease course immediately after the cessation of ART. Taken together, these data indicated that the regulation of apoptosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of disease after the cessation of ART. Furthermore, as there appeared to be little difference in HIV pathogenesis after the initial establishment of viral set point following infection and after the reestablishment of viral set point following TI, the regulation of apoptosis may play an important role in HIV pathogenesis throughout the course of HIV infection. Observations in the nonhuman primate model report a species-specific, divergent immune response in a natural host (sooty mangabey) and a nonnatural host (rhesus macaque) that is evident from the time of infection with uncloned simian immunodeficiency virus, sooty mangabey (SIVsm). Both hosts developed high levels of viremia but in the sooty mangabey, an attenuated immune response was correlated with an absence of CD4+ T-cell decline and simian immunovirus (SIV)-associated pathogenesis. These observations suggest that the host response to infection plays a critical role in SIV, and by extension, HIV, pathogenesis.31 Similar observations have been reported in three HIV-seropositive persons who are long-term nonprogressors.32
The Ras signaling pathway is the specific gene family associated by GSEA with differential outcome after TI. Ras, named for its association with rat sarcoma viral oncogenes, is an extensively studied small guanosine triphosphatase protein33 that relays extracellular signals to intracellular signaling cascades. The protein plays a pivotal role in the complex positive and negative feedback loops that modulate cell survival and cell death, as well as cell proliferation and differentiation.34–36 Understandably, this protein has been scrutinized by the oncology field as a potential drug target to halt the transformation and unchecked growth associated with cancer.37 In our study, the cascade of the convoluted Ras signaling pathway that is associated with differential outcome after TI involved impingement on PI3K (also known as PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase catalytic subunit, alpha isoform) and ERK (extracellular signal regulated kinase) / RAF 1 (vraf1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1). Among the myriad of regulatory pathways involving Ras, the pathway associated with good outcome in our study modulates antiapoptotic processes.35,38,39 Gene expression patterns of PI3K, RELA (v-rel riticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene, homolog A), NFkB1 (nuclear factor of kappa light chain polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1), and RAF 1 identified by GSEA support the conclusion that this cascade, which directs the downregulation of apoptosis,35,38,39 is associated with differential outcome in our study.
Modulation of cell survival by the Ras signaling pathway has been shown to depend on cell type and level of gene expression.38,40 However, the assessment of the transcriptional patterns within the total PBMC compartment cannot pinpoint causal processes within a particular cellular subcompartment or to a specific functional protein. Nevertheless, downregulation of apoptosis in the good outcome group, as assessed in the PBMC compartment, was associated with a statistically significant, fourfold less decline in CD4+ T cells than observed in the poor outcome group. This observation is consistent with that of van Grevenynghe and colleagues, who reported that the central memory CD4+ T cells of elite controllers were less susceptible to Fas-regulated apoptosis.41 It is also important to note that persons with higher CD4+ cell nadir while on ART exhibited a delayed time to the development of primary clinical end points in the study from which these samples were drawn.6 Observations from the SMART study that addressed outcome during episodic antiretroviral therapy guided by CD4+ T cell counts showed a significantly increased risk of opportunistic infections and death compared with continuous therapy, which was postulated to be due to a decline in CD4+ T cells and concomitant increase in viral load.24 Furthermore, that gene expression patterns associated with the downregulation of apoptosis in the good outcome group could be distinguished so early (week 0) may indicate that such patterns had been established prior to the cessation of ART.
The identification of a set of genes definitively associated with the downregulation of cell death as an attribute of the good outcome group is a reasonable point of departure for future studies on specific subpopulations of cells or in animal models that might confirm and extend our observations to specific cell types or tissues. Ultimately, candidate biomarkers such as these, determined in well controlled clinical studies in which the traditional makers of viral load and CD4+ T cells are well characterized, will need to be evaluated in prospective clinical studies.
Appendix:
Full Annotation Information for Differentially Expressed Genes
| ProbesetIDs | Symbols | PublicID | UniGeneID | Chromosome location | Gene title |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good outcome group: 51 up regulated genes | |||||
| 206486_at | LAG3 | NM_002286 | Hs.409523 | chr12p13.32 | Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 |
| 203554_x_at | PTTG1 | NM_004219 | Hs.350966 | chr5q35.1 | Pituitary tumor-transforming 1 |
| 202589_at | TYMS | NM_001071 | Hs.592338 | chr18p11.32 | Thymidylate synthetase |
| 200986_at | SERPING1 | NM_000062 | Hs.384598 | chr11q12-q13.1 | Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade G (C1 inhibitor), member 1 |
| 209773_s_at | RRM2 | BC001886 | Hs.226390 | chr2p25-p24 | Ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide |
| 206666_at | GZMK | NM_002104 | Hs.277937 | chr5q11-q12 | Granzyme K (granzyme 3; tryptase II) |
| 218039_at | NUSAP1 | NM_016359 | Hs.615092 | chr15q15.1 | Nucleolar and spindle-associated protein 1 |
| 214453_s_at | IFI44 | NM_006417 | Hs.82316 | chr1p31.1 | Interferon-induced protein 44 |
| 207840_at | CD160 | NM_007053 | Hs.488237 | chr1q21.1 | CD160 molecule |
| 206513_at | AIM2 | NM_004833 | Hs.281898 | chr1q22 | Absent in melanoma 2 |
| 204439_at | IFI44L | NM_006820 | Hs.389724 | chr1p31.1 | Interferon-induced protein 44-like |
| 205483_s_at | ISG15 | NM_005101 | Hs.458485 | chr1p36.33 | ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier |
| 200629_at | WARS | NM_004184 | Hs.497599 | chr14q32.31 | Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase |
| 204747_at | IFIT3 | NM_001549 | Hs.47338 | chr10q24 | Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 |
| 204639_at | ADA | NM_000022 | Hs.255479 | chr20q12-q13.11 | Adenosine deaminase |
| 216615_s_at | HTR3A | AJ005205 | Hs.413899 | chr11q23.1 | 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 3A |
| 201649_at | UBE2L6 | NM_004223 | Hs.425777 | chr11q12 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 6 |
| 204224_s_at | GCH1 | NM_000161 | Hs.86724 | chr14q22.1-q22.2 | GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (dopa-responsive dystonia) |
| 217933_s_at | LAP3 | NM_015907 | Hs.570791 | chr4p15.32 | Leucine aminopeptidase 3 |
| 213060_s_at | CHI3L2 | U58515 | Hs.514840 | chr1p13.3 | Chitinase 3-like 2 / / / chitinase 3-like 2 |
| 209040_s_at | PSMB8 | U17496 | Hs.180062 | chr6p21.3 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 8 |
| 200887_s_at | STAT1 | NM_007315 | Hs.651258 | chr2q32.2 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91kDa |
| 204246_s_at | DCTN3 | NM_007234 | Hs.511768 | chr9p13 | Dynactin 3 (p22) |
| 202086_at | MX1 | NM_002462 | Hs.517307 | chr21q22.3 | Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 |
| 218400_at | OAS3 | NM_006187 | Hs.528634 | chr12q24.2 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 3, 100kDa |
| 203153_at | IFIT1 | NM_001548 | Hs.20315 | chr10q25-q26 | Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 |
| 218943_s_at | DDX58 | NM_014314 | Hs.190622 | chr9p12 | DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58 |
| 205241_at | SCO2 | NM_005138 | Hs.567405 | chr22q13.33 | SCO cytochrome oxidase-deficient homolog 2 (yeast) |
| 203232_s_at | ATXN1 | NM_000332 | Hs.434961 | chr6p23 | Ataxin 1 |
| 200814_at | PSME1 | NM_006263 | Hs.75348 | chr14q11.2 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 1 |
| 201274_at | PSMA5 | NM_002790 | Hs.485246 | chr1p13 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, alpha type, 5 |
| 206991_s_at | CCR5 | NM_000579 | Hs.450802 | chr3p21.31 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 |
| 210046_s_at | IDH2 | U52144 | Hs.596461 | chr15q26.1 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (NADP+), mitochondrial |
| 201762_s_at | PSME2 | NM_002818 | Hs.434081 | chr14q11.2 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 2 |
| 215332_s_at | CD8B | AW296309 | Hs.405667 | chr2p12 | CD8b molecule |
| 204415_at | IFI6 | NM_022873 | Hs.523847 | chr1p35 | Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 6 |
| 202095_s_at | BIRC5 | NM_001168 | Hs.514527 | chr17q25 | Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 5 (survivin) |
| 200923_at | LGALS3BP | NM_005567 | Hs.514535 | chr17q25 | Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 binding protein |
| 204655_at | CCL5 | NM_002985 | Hs.514821 | chr17q11.2-q12 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 |
| 218350_s_at | GMNN | NM_015895 | Hs.234896 | chr6p22.2 | Geminin, DNA replication inhibitor |
| 209714_s_at | CDKN3 | AF213033 | Hs.84113 | chr14q22 | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3 |
| 204173_at | MYL6B | NM_002475 | Hs.632731 | chr12q13.13 | Myosin, light chain 6B, alkali, smooth muscle and non-muscle |
| 200633_at | UBB | NM_018955 | Hs.356190 | chr17p12-p11.2 | Ubiquitin B / / / ubiquitin B |
| 44673_at | SIGLEC1 | N53555 | Hs.31869 | chr20p13 | Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1, sialoadhesin |
| 210243_s_at | B4GALT3 | AF038661 | Hs.321231 | chr1q21-q23 | UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 3 |
| 200961_at | SEPHS2 | NM_012248 | Hs.118725 | chr16p11.2 | Selenophosphate synthetase 2 |
| 204798_at | MYB | NM_005375 | Hs.531941 | chr6q22-q23 | V-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) |
| 204279_at | PSMB9 | NM_002800 | Hs.132682 | chr6p21.3 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 9 |
| 215313_x_at | HLA-A | AA573862 | Hs.181244 | chr6p21.3 | Major histocompatibility complex, class I, A |
| 212203_x_at | IFITM3 | BF338947 | Hs.374650 | chr11p15.5 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 (1-8U) |
| 202411_at | IFI27 | NM_005532 | Hs.532634 | chr14q32 | Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27 |
| Poor outcome group: 133 upregulated genes | |||||
| 214453_s_at | IFI44 | NM_006417 | Hs.82316 | chr1p31.1 | Interferon-induced protein 44 |
| 204439_at | IFI44L | NM_006820 | Hs.389724 | chr1p31.1 | Interferon-induced protein 44-like |
| 204747_at | IFIT3 | NM_001549 | Hs.47338 | chr10q24 | Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3 |
| 219863_at | HERC5 | NM_016323 | Hs.26663 | chr4q22.1 | Hect domain and RLD 5 |
| 203153_at | IFIT1 | NM_001548 | Hs.20315 | chr10q25-q26 | Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 |
| 200986_at | SERPING1 | NM_000062 | Hs.384598 | chr11q12-q13.1 | Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade G (C1 inhibitor), member 1 |
| 202748_at | GBP2 | NM_004120 | Hs.386567 | chr1p22.2 | Guanylate binding protein 2, interferon-inducible |
| 205483_s_at | ISG15 | NM_005101 | Hs.458485 | chr1p36.33 | ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier |
| 218400_at | OAS3 | NM_006187 | Hs.528634 | chr12q24.2 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 3, 100kDa |
| 206486_at | LAG3 | NM_002286 | Hs.409523 | chr12p13.32 | Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 |
| 202086_at | MX1 | NM_002462 | Hs.517307 | chr21q22.3 | Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 |
| 200923_at | LGALS3BP | NM_005567 | Hs.514535 | chr17q25 | Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 binding protein |
| 44673_at | SIGLEC1 | N53555 | Hs.31869 | chr20p13 | Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1, sialoadhesin |
| 202270_at | GBP1 | NM_002053 | Hs.62661 | chr1p22.2 | Guanylate binding protein 1, interferon-inducible |
| 202145_at | LY6E | NM_002346 | Hs.521903 | chr8q24.3 | Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus E |
| 205241_at | SCO2 | NM_005138 | Hs.567405 | chr22q13.33 | SCO cytochrome oxidase deficient homolog 2 (yeast) |
| 201786_s_at | ADAR | NM_001111 | Hs.12341 | chr1q21.1-q21.2 | Adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific |
| 208436_s_at | IRF7 | NM_004030 | Hs.166120 | chr11p15.5 | Interferon regulatory factor 7 |
| 218039_at | NUSAP1 | NM_016359 | Hs.615092 | chr15q15.1 | Nucleolar and spindle-associated protein 1 |
| 204224_s_at | GCH1 | NM_000161 | Hs.86724 | chr14q22.1-q22.2 | GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (dopa-responsive dystonia) |
| 218350_s_at | GMNN | NM_015895 | Hs.234896 | chr6p22.2 | Geminin, DNA replication inhibitor |
| 204415_at | IFI6 | NM_022873 | Hs.523847 | chr1p35 | Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 6 |
| 203358_s_at | EZH2 | NM_004456 | Hs.444082 | chr7q35-q36 | Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Drosophila) |
| 204994_at | MX2 | NM_002463 | Hs.926 | chr21q22.3 | Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 2 (mouse) |
| 203554_x_at | PTTG1 | NM_004219 | Hs.350966 | chr5q35.1 | Pituitary tumor-transforming 1 |
| 212203_x_at | IFITM3 | BF338947 | Hs.374650 | chr11p15.5 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 3 (1-8U) |
| 202411_at | IFI27 | NM_005532 | Hs.532634 | chr14q32 | Interferon, alpha-inducible protein 27 |
| 212185_x_at | MT2A | NM_005953 | Hs.647371 | chr16q13 | Metallothionein 2A |
| 201762_s_at | PSME2 | NM_002818 | Hs.434081 | chr14q11.2 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 2 (PA28 beta) |
| 206914_at | CRTAM | NM_019604 | Hs.159523 | chr11q22-q23 | Cytotoxic and regulatory T cell molecule |
| 206991_s_at | CCR5 | NM_000579 | Hs.450802 | chr3p21.31 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 |
| 207840_at | CD160 | NM_007053 | Hs.488237 | chr1q21.1 | CD160 molecule |
| 202589_at | TYMS | NM_001071 | Hs.592338 | chr18p11.32 | Thymidylate synthetase |
| 210797_s_at | OASL | AF063612 | Hs.118633 | chr12q24.2 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase-like |
| 206133_at | BIRC4BP | NM_017523 | Hs.441975 | chr17p13.2 | XIAP associated factor-1 |
| 204655_at | CCL5 | NM_002985 | Hs.514821 | chr17q11.2-q12 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 |
| 201649_at | UBE2L6 | NM_004223 | Hs.425777 | chr11q12 | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2L 6 |
| 204858_s_at | ECGF1 | NM_001953 | Hs.592212 | chr22q13-22q13.33 | Endothelial cell growth factor 1 (platelet-derived) |
| 200629_at | WARS | NM_004184 | Hs.497599 | chr14q32.31 | Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase |
| 204204_at | SLC31A2 | NM_001860 | Hs.24030 | chr9q31-q32 | Solute carrier family 31 (copper transporters), member 2 |
| 216526_x_at | HLA-C | AK024836 | Hs.77961 | chr6p21.3 | Major histocompatibility complex, class I, C |
| 205692_s_at | CD38 | NM_001775 | Hs.479214 | chr4p15 | CD38 molecule |
| 221485_at | B4GALT5 | AL035683 | Hs.370487 | chr20q13.1-q13.2 | UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5 |
| 218599_at | REC8L1 | NM_005132 | Hs.419259 | chr14q11.2-q12 | REC8-like 1 (yeast) |
| 210046_s_at | IDH2 | U52144 | Hs.596461 | chr15q26.1 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (NADP+), mitochondrial |
| 206513_at | AIM2 | NM_004833 | Hs.281898 | chr1q22 | Absent in melanoma 2 |
| 204211_x_at | EIF2AK2 | NM_002759 | Hs.131431 | chr2p22-p21 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 2 |
| 200887_s_at | STAT1 | NM_007315 | Hs.651258 | chr2q32.2 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91kDa |
| 203052_at | C2 | NM_000063 | Hs.408903 | chr6p21.3 | Complement component 2 |
| 206461_x_at | MT1H | NM_005951 | Hs.438462 | chr16q13 | Metallothionein 1H |
| 217933_s_at | LAP3 | NM_015907 | Hs.570791 | chr4p15.32 | Leucine aminopeptidase 3 |
| 204972_at | OAS2 | NM_016817 | Hs.414332 | chr12q24.2 | 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 2, 69/71kDa |
| 202954_at | PAK3 | NM_007019 | Hs.93002 | chrXq22.3-q23 | p21 (CDKN1A)-activated kinase 3 |
| 202345_s_at | FABP5 | NM_001444 | Hs.632112 | chr8q21.13 | Fatty acid binding protein 5 (psoriasis-associated) |
| 218943_s_at | DDX58 | NM_014314 | Hs.190622 | chr9p12 | DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58 |
| 202484_s_at | MBD2 | AF072242 | Hs.25674 | chr18q21 | Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 2 |
| 202953_at | C1QB | NM_000491 | Hs.8986 | chr1p36.12 | Complement component 1, q subcomponent, B chain |
| 201315_x_at | IFITM2 | NM_006435 | Hs.174195 | chr11p15.5 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 2 (1–8D) |
| 205552_s_at | OAS1 | NM_002534 | Hs.524760 | chr12q24.1 | 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase 1, 40/46kDa |
| 209773_s_at | RRM2 | BC001886 | Hs.226390 | chr2p25-p24 | Ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide |
| 219684_at | RTP4 | NM_022147 | Hs.43388 | chr3q27.3 | Receptor (chemosensory) transporter protein 4 |
| 204533_at | CXCL10 | NM_001565 | Hs.632586 | chr4q21 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 |
| 203350_at | AP1G1 | NM_001128 | Hs.461253 | chr16q23 | Adaptor-related protein complex 1, gamma 1 subunit |
| 202107_s_at | MCM2 | NM_004526 | Hs.477481 | chr3q21 | MCM2 minichromosome maintenance deficient 2, mitotin (S. cerevisiae) |
| 215313_x_at | HLA-A | AA573862 | Hs.181244 | chr6p21.3 | Major histocompatibility complex, class I, A |
| 201088_at | KPNA2 | NM_002266 | Hs.632749 | chr17q23.1-q23.3 | Karyopherin alpha 2 (RAG cohort 1, importin alpha 1) |
| 210354_at | IFNG | M29383 | Hs.856 | chr12q14 | Interferon, gamma |
| 213475_s_at | ITGAL | AC002310 | Hs.174103 | chr16p11.2 | Integrin, alpha L (antigen CD11A (p180) |
| 35254_at | TRAFD1 | AB007447 | Hs.5148 | chr12q | TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1 |
| 218662_s_at | NCAPG | NM_022346 | Hs.567567 | chr4p15.33 | Non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G |
| 208683_at | CAPN2 | M23254 | Hs.350899 | chr1q41-q42 | Calpain 2, (m/II) large subunit |
| 203344_s_at | RBBP8 | NM_002894 | Hs.546282 | chr18q11.2 | Retinoblastoma binding protein 8 |
| 203882_at | ISGF3G | NM_006084 | Hs.1706 | chr14q11.2 | Interferon-stimulated transcription factor 3, gamma 48kDa |
| 203050_at | TP53BP1 | NM_005657 | Hs.440968 | chr15q15-q21 | Tumor protein p53 binding protein, 1 |
| 203258_at | DRAP1 | NM_006442 | Hs.356742 | chr11q13.3 | DR1-associated protein 1 (negative cofactor 2 alpha) |
| 203455_s_at | SAT1 | NM_002970 | Hs.28491 | chrXp22.1 | Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase 1 |
| 203606_at | NDUFS6 | NM_004553 | Hs.408257 | chr5p15.33 | NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 6, 13kDa |
| 35974_at | LRMP | U10485 | Hs.124922 | chr12p12.1 | Lymphoid-restricted membrane protein |
| 205633_s_at | ALAS1 | NM_000688 | Hs.476308 | chr3p21.1 | Aminolevulinate, delta-, synthase 1 |
| 219209_at | IFIH1 | NM_022168 | Hs.163173 | chr2p24.3-q24.3 | Interferon induced with helicase C domain 1 |
| 207614_s_at | CUL1 | NM_003592 | Hs.146806 | chr7q36.1 | Cullin 1 |
| 216950_s_at | FCGR1A | X14355 | Hs.77424 | chr1q21.2-q21.3 | Fc fragment of IgG, high-affinity Ia, receptor (CD64) |
| 202446_s_at | PLSCR1 | AI825926 | Hs.130759 | chr3q23 | Phospholipid scramblase 1 |
| 214022_s_at | IFITM1 | AA749101 | Hs.458414 | chr11p15.5 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 (9–27) |
| 202863_at | SP100 | NM_003113 | Hs.369056 | chr2q37.1 | SP100 nuclear antigen |
| 204146_at | RAD51AP1 | BE966146 | Hs.591046 | chr12p13.2-p13.1 | RAD51 associated protein 1 |
| 203236_s_at | LGALS9 | NM_009587 | Hs.81337 | chr17q11.1 | Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 9 (galectin 9) |
| 207181_s_at | CASP7 | NM_001227 | Hs.9216 | chr10q25 | Caspase 7, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase |
| 219938_s_at | PSTPIP2 | NM_024430 | Hs.567384 | chr18q12 | Proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 2 |
| 203217_s_at | ST3GAL5 | NM_003896 | Hs.415117 | chr2p11.2 | ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 5 |
| 219212_at | HSPA14 | NM_016299 | Hs.534169 | chr10p13 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 14 |
| 204929_s_at | VAMP5 | NM_006634 | Hs.172684 | chr2p11.2 | Vesicle-associated membrane protein 5 (myobrevin) |
| 243_g_at | MAP4 | M64571 | Hs.517949 | chr3p21 | Microtubule-associated protein 4 |
| 220966_x_at | ARPC5L | NM_030978 | Hs.132499 | chr9q33.3 | Actin-related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 5-like |
| 202735_at | EBP | NM_006579 | Hs.30619 | chrXp11.23-p11.22 | Emopamil binding protein (sterol isomerase) |
| 203805_s_at | FANCA | AW083279 | Hs.567267 | chr16q24.3 | Fanconi anemia, complementation group A |
| 204279_at | PSMB9 | NM_002800 | Hs.132682 | chr6p21.3 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 9 |
| 204175_at | ZNF593 | NM_015871 | –– | chr1p36.11 | Zinc finger protein 593 |
| 200814_at | PSME1 | NM_006263 | Hs.75348 | chr14q11.2 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) activator subunit 1 |
| 204780_s_at | FAS | AA164751 | Hs.244139 | chr10q24.1 | Fas (TNF receptor superfamily, member 6) |
| 219159_s_at | SLAMF7 | NM_021181 | Hs.517265 | chr1q23.1-q24.1 | SLAM family member 7 |
| 219716_at | APOL6 | NM_030641 | Hs.257352 | chr22q12.3 | Apolipoprotein L, 6 |
| 205569_at | LAMP3 | NM_014398 | Hs.518448 | chr3q26.3-q27 | Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 3 |
| 219148_at | PBK | NM_018492 | Hs.104741 | chr8p21.2 | PDZ binding kinase |
| 207509_s_at | LAIR2 | NM_002288 | Hs.43803 | chr19q13.4 | Leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 2 |
| 221345_at | FFAR2 | NM_005306 | Hs.248056 | chr19q13.1 | Free fatty acid receptor 2 |
| 203755_at | BUB1B | NM_001211 | Hs.631699 | chr15q15 | BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (yeast) |
| 202702_at | TRIM26 | NM_003449 | Hs.485041 | chr6p21.3 | Tripartite motif-containing 26 |
| 221816_s_at | PHF11 | BF055474 | Hs.535080 | chr13q14.3 | PHD finger protein 11 |
| 202688_at | TNFSF10 | NM_003810 | Hs.478275 | chr3q26 | Tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 10 |
| 204639_at | ADA | NM_000022 | Hs.255479 | chr20q12-q13.11 | Adenosine deaminase |
| 204162_at | KNTC2 | NM_006101 | Hs.414407 | chr18p11.32 | Kinetochore associated 2 |
| 204804_at | TRIM21 | NM_003141 | Hs.632402 | chr11p15.5 | Tripartite motif-containing 21 |
| 203868_s_at | VCAM1 | NM_001078 | Hs.109225 | chr1p32-p31 | Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 |
| 207375_s_at | IL15RA | NM_002189 | Hs.524117 | chr10p15-p14 | Interleukin 15 receptor, alpha |
| 219211_at | USP18 | NM_017414 | Hs.38260 | chr22q11.21 | Ubiquitin specific peptidase 18 |
| 206247_at | MICB | NM_005931 | Hs.211580 | chr6p21.3 | MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence B |
| 202870_s_at | CDC20 | NM_001255 | Hs.524947 | chr1p34.1 | Cell division cycle 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae) |
| 208901_s_at | TOP1 | J03250 | Hs.592136 | chr20q12-q13.1 | Topoisomerase (DNA) I |
| 209666_s_at | CHUK | AF080157 | Hs.198998 | chr10q24-q25 | Conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase |
| 219607_s_at | MS4A4A | NM_024021 | Hs.325960 | chr11q12 | Membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A, member 4 |
| 206919_at | ELK4 | NM_021795 | Hs.497520 | chr1q32 | ELK4, ETS-domain protein (SRF accessory protein 1) |
| 215171_s_at | TIMM17A | AK023063 | Hs.20716 | chr1q32.1 | Translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 17 homolog A (yeast) |
| 202068_s_at | LDLR | NM_000527 | Hs.213289 | chr19p13.3 | Low density lipoprotein receptor (familial hypercholesterolemia) |
| 204009_s_at | KRAS | W80678 | Hs.505033 | chr12p12.1 | v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog |
| 205687_at | UBPH | NM_019116 | Hs.3459 | chr16p12 | Ubiquitin-binding protein homolog |
| 202087_s_at | CTSL | NM_001912 | Hs.418123 | chr9q21-q22 | Cathepsin L |
| 216598_s_at | CCL2 | S69738 | Hs.303649 | chr17q11.2-q12 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 |
| 214933_at | CACNA1A | AA769818 | Hs.501632 | chr19p13.2-p13.1 | Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, P/Q type, alpha 1A subunit |
| 203420_at | FAM8A1 | NM_016255 | Hs.95260 | chr6p22-p23 | Family with sequence similarity 8, member A1 |
| 203964_at | NMI | NM_004688 | Hs.54483 | chr2p24.3-q21.3 | N-myc (and STAT) interactor |
| 208969_at | NDUFA9 | AF050641 | Hs.75227 | chr12p13.3 | NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 9, 39kDa |
| 201664_at | SMC4 | AL136877 | Hs.58992 | chr3q26.1 | Structural maintenance of chromosomes 4 |
| Poor outcome group: 208 downregulated genes | |||||
| 201892_s_at | IMPDH2 | NM_000884 | Hs.476231 | chr3p21.2 | IMP (inosine monophosphate) dehydrogenase 2 |
| 211937_at | EIF4B | NM_001417 | Hs.292063 | chr12q13.13 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B |
| 200651_at | GNB2L1 | NM_006098 | Hs.5662 | chr5q35.3 | Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) |
| 203685_at | BCL2 | NM_000633 | Hs.150749 | chr18q21.33 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 |
| 221476_s_at | RPL15 | AF279903 | Hs.381219 | chr3p24.2 | Ribosomal protein L15 |
| 218253_s_at | LGTN | NM_006893 | Hs.497581 | chr1q31-q32 | Ligatin |
| 200005_at | EIF3S7 | NM_003753 | Hs.55682 | chr22q13.1 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 7 zeta |
| 219452_at | DPEP2 | NM_022355 | Hs.372633 | chr16q22.1 | Dipeptidase 2 |
| 205019_s_at | VIPR1 | NM_004624 | Hs.348500 | chr3p22 | Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 |
| 210908_s_at | PFDN5 | AB055804 | –– | chr12q12 | Prefoldin subunit 5 |
| 214167_s_at | RPLP0 | AA555113 | Hs.448226 | chr12q24.2 | Ribosomal protein, large, P0 |
| 205259_at | NR3C2 | NM_000901 | Hs.163924 | chr4q31.1 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 3, group C, member 2 |
| 210027_s_at | APEX1 | M80261 | Hs.73722 | chr14q11.2-q12 | APEX nuclease (multifunctional DNA repair enzyme) 1 |
| 200089_s_at | RPL4 | AI953886 | Hs.644628 | chr15q22 | Ribosomal protein L4 |
| 201433_s_at | PTDSS1 | NM_014754 | Hs.292579 | chr8q22 | Phosphatidylserine synthase 1 |
| 220755_s_at | C6orf48 | NM_016947 | Hs.640836 | chr6p21.3 | Chromosome 6 open reading frame 48 |
| 200705_s_at | EEF1B2 | NM_001959 | Hs.421608 | chr2q33-q34 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 beta 2 |
| 200024_at | RPS5 | NM_001009 | Hs.378103 | chr19q13.4 | Ribosomal protein S5 |
| 201064_s_at | PABPC4 | NM_003819 | Hs.169900 | chr1p32-p36 | Poly(A) binding protein, cytoplasmic 4 (inducible form) |
| 218997_at | POLR1E | NM_022490 | Hs.591087 | chr9p13.2 | Polymerase (RNA) I polypeptide E, 53kDa |
| 210715_s_at | SPINT2 | AF027205 | Hs.31439 | chr19q13.1 | Serine peptidase inhibitor, Kunitz type, 2 |
| 202283_at | SERPINF1 | NM_002615 | Hs.645378 | chr17p13.1 | Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade F (alpha-2 antiplasmin |
| 200937_s_at | RPL5 | NM_000969 | Hs.532359 | chr1p22.1 | Ribosomal protein L5 |
| 216520_s_at | TPT1 | AF072098 | Hs.374596 | chr13q12-q14 | Tumor protein, translationally controlled 1 |
| 219549_s_at | RTN3 | NM_006054 | Hs.473761 | chr11q13 | Reticulon 3 |
| 219922_s_at | LTBP3 | NM_021070 | Hs.289019 | chr11q12 | Latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 3 |
| 219892_at | TM6SF1 | NM_023003 | Hs.513094 | chr15q24-q26 | Transmembrane 6 superfamily member 1 |
| 208631_s_at | HADHA | U04627 | Hs.516032 | chr2p23 | Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase |
| 218495_at | UXT | NM_004182 | Hs.172791 | chrXp11.23-p11.22 | Ubiquitously-expressed transcript |
| 206559_x_at | EEF1A1 | NM_001403 | –– | chr6q14.1 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 |
| 200858_s_at | RPS8 | NM_001012 | Hs.512675 | chr1p34.1-p32 | Ribosomal protein S8 |
| 217747_s_at | RPS9 | NM_001013 | Hs.546288 | chr19q13.4 | Ribosomal protein S9 |
| 206760_s_at | FCER2 | NM_002002 | Hs.465778 | chr19p13.3 | Fc fragment of IgE, low affinity II, receptor for (CD23) |
| 200032_s_at | RPL9 | NM_000661 | Hs.513083 | chr4p13 | Ribosomal protein L9 / / / ribosomal protein L9 |
| 201258_at | RPS16 | NM_001020 | Hs.397609 | chr19q13.1 | Ribosomal protein S16 |
| 205987_at | CD1C | NM_001765 | Hs.132448 | chr1q22-q23 | CD1c molecule |
| 206492_at | FHIT | NM_002012 | Hs.196981 | chr3p14.2 | Fragile histidine triad gene |
| 222212_s_at | LASS2 | AK001105 | Hs.643565 | chr1q21.2 | LAG1 homolog, ceramide synthase 2 (S. cerevisiae) |
| 204153_s_at | MFNG | NM_002405 | Hs.517603 | chr22q12 | MFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase |
| 216032_s_at | ERGIC3 | AF091085 | Hs.472558 | chr20pter-q12 | ERGIC and golgi 3 |
| 218084_x_at | FXYD5 | NM_014164 | Hs.333418 | chr19q12-q13.1 | FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 5 |
| 207339_s_at | LTB | NM_002341 | Hs.376208 | chr6p21.3 | Lymphotoxin beta (TNF superfamily, member 3) |
| 201276_at | RAB5B | AF267863 | Hs.567328 | chr12q13 | RAB5B, member RAS oncogene family |
| 206337_at | CCR7 | NM_001838 | Hs.370036 | chr17q12-q21.2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 7 / / / chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 7 |
| 221558_s_at | LEF1 | AF288571 | Hs.555947 | chr4q23-q25 | Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 |
| 214437_s_at | SHMT2 | NM_005412 | Hs.75069 | chr12q12-q14 | Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 2 (mitochondrial) |
| 203233_at | IL4R | NM_000418 | Hs.513457 | chr16p11.2-12.1 | Interleukin 4 receptor |
| 200909_s_at | RPLP2 | NM_001004 | –– | chr11p15.5-p15.4 | Ribosomal protein, large, P2 |
| 203787_at | SSBP2 | NM_012446 | Hs.102735 | chr5q14.1 | Single-stranded DNA binding protein 2 |
| 208754_s_at | NAP1L1 | AL162068 | Hs.524599 | chr12q21.2 | Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1 |
| 210189_at | HSPA1L | D85730 | Hs.558337 | chr6p21.3 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 1-like |
| 200082_s_at | RPS7 | AI805587 | Hs.534346 | chr2p25 | Ribosomal protein S |
| 200034_s_at | RPL6 | NM_000970 | Hs.528668 | chr12q24.1 | Ribosomal protein L6 |
| 201050_at | PLD3 | NM_012268 | Hs.257008 | chr19q13.2 | Phospholipase D family, member 3 |
| 203385_at | DGKA | NM_001345 | Hs.524488 | chr12q13.3 | Diacylglycerol kinase, alpha 80 kDa |
| 200010_at | RPL11 | NM_000975 | Hs.388664 | chr1p36.1-p35 | Ribosomal protein L11 |
| 203509_at | SORL1 | NM_003105 | Hs.368592 | chr11q23.2-q24.2 | Sortilin-related receptor, L(DLR class) A repeats-containing |
| 200652_at | SSR2 | NM_003145 | Hs.74564 | chr1q21-q23 | Signal sequence receptor |
| 201136_at | PLP2 | NM_002668 | Hs.77422 | chrXp11.23 | Proteolipid protein 2 (colonic epithelium-enriched) |
| 210949_s_at | EIF3S8 | BC000533 | Hs.535464 | chr16p11.2 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 8 |
| 212191_x_at | RPL13 | AW574664 | Hs.410817 | chr16q24.3 | Ribosomal protein L13 |
| 209368_at | EPHX2 | AF233336 | Hs.212088 | chr8p21-p12 | Epoxide hydrolase 2, cytoplasmic |
| 208697_s_at | EIF3S6 | BC000734 | Hs.405590 | chr8q22-q23 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 6 48 kDa |
| 208764_s_at | ATP5G2 | D13119 | Hs.524464 | chr12q13.13 | ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F0 complex, subunit C2 (subunit 9) |
| 200823_x_at | RPL29 | NM_000992 | Hs.425125 | chr3p21.3-p21.2 | Ribosomal protein L29 |
| 200936_at | RPL8 | NM_000973 | Hs.178551 | chr8q24.3 | Ribosomal protein L8 |
| 201106_at | GPX4 | NM_002085 | Hs.433951 | chr19p13.3 | Glutathione peroxidase 4 (phospholipid hydroperoxidase) |
| 203413_at | NELL2 | NM_006159 | Hs.505326 | chr12q13.11-q13.12 | NEL-like 2 (chicken) |
| 203818_s_at | SF3A3 | NM_006802 | Hs.77897 | chr1p34.3 | Splicing factor 3a, subunit 3, 60 kDa |
| 200081_s_at | RPS6 | BE741754 | Hs.408073 | chr9p21 | Ribosomal protein S6 / / / ribosomal protein S6 |
| 217860_at | NDUFA10 | NM_004544 | Hs.277677 | chr2q37.3 | NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex |
| 208771_s_at | LTA4H | J02959 | Hs.524648 | chr12q22 | Leukotriene A4 hydrolase |
| 219528_s_at | BCL11B | NM_022898 | Hs.510396 | chr14q32.2 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 11B (zinc finger protein) |
| 221593_s_at | RPL31 | BC001663 | Hs.469473 | chr2q11.2 | Ribosomal protein L31 |
| 201812_s_at | TOMM7 | NM_019059 | Hs.380920 | chr7p15.3 | Translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 7 homolog (yeast) |
| 200023_s_at | EIF3S5 | NM_003754 | Hs.516023 | chr11p15.4 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 5 epsilon |
| 39318_at | TCL1A | X82240 | Hs.2484 | chr14q32.1 | T-cell leukemia/lymphoma 1A |
| 203547_at | CD4 | U47924 | Hs.631659 | chr12pter-p12 | CD4 molecule / / / CD4 molecule |
| 207895_at | NAALADL1 | NM_005468 | Hs.13967 | chr11q12 | N-acetylated alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase-like 1 |
| 203113_s_at | EEF1D | NM_001960 | Hs.333388 | chr8q24.3 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 delta |
| 200717_x_at | RPL7 | NM_000971 | Hs.571841 | chr8q21.11 | Ribosomal protein L7 |
| 208703_s_at | APLP2 | BG427393 | Hs.370247 | chr11q23-q25 | Amyloid beta (A4) precursor-like protein 2 |
| 213093_at | PRKCA | AI471375 | Hs.531704 | chr17q22-q23.2 | Protein kinase C, alpha |
| 200695_at | PPP2R1A | NM_014225 | Hs.467192 | chr19q13.33 | Protein phosphatase 2 (formerly 2A) |
| 202179_at | BLMH | NM_000386 | Hs.371914 | chr17q11.2 | Bleomycin hydrolase |
| 200817_x_at | RPS10 | NM_001014 | Hs.645317 | chr6p21.31 | Ribosomal protein S10 |
| 200965_s_at | ABLIM1 | NM_006720 | Hs.438236 | chr10q25 | Actin binding LIM protein 1 |
| 201005_at | CD9 | NM_001769 | Hs.114286 | chr12p13.3 | CD9 molecule |
| 209504_s_at | PLEKHB1 | AF081583 | Hs.445489 | chr11q13.5-q14.1 | Pleckstrin homology domain containing |
| 200933_x_at | RPS4X | NM_001007 | Hs.446628 | chrXq13.1 | Ribosomal protein S4, X-linked |
| 204949_at | ICAM3 | NM_002162 | Hs.75516 | chr19p13.3-p13.2 | Intercellular adhesion molecule 3 |
| 213762_x_at | RBMX | AI452524 | Hs.380118 | chrXq26.3 | RNA binding motif protein, X-linked |
| 203581_at | RAB4A | BC002438 | Hs.296169 | chr1q42-q43 | RAB4A, member RAS oncogene family |
| 217846_at | QARS | NM_005051 | Hs.79322 | chr3p21.3-p21.1 | Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase |
| 202862_at | FAH | NM_000137 | Hs.73875 | chr15q23-q25 | Fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (fumarylacetoacetase) |
| 205039_s_at | IKZF1 | NM_006060 | Hs.488251 | chr7p13-p11.1 | IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (Ikaros) |
| 200008_s_at | GDI2 | D13988 | Hs.299055 | chr10p15 | GDP dissociation inhibitor 2 / / / GDP dissociation inhibitor 2 |
| 210786_s_at | FLI1 | M93255 | Hs.504281 | chr11q24.1-q24.3 | Friend leukemia virus integration 1 |
| 204777_s_at | MAL | NM_002371 | Hs.80395 | chr2cen-q13 | Mal, T-cell differentiation protein |
| 209264_s_at | TSPAN4 | AF054841 | Hs.437594 | chr11p15.5 | Tetraspanin 4 |
| 200736_s_at | GPX1 | NM_000581 | Hs.76686 | chr3p21.3 | Glutathione peroxidase 1 |
| 201417_at | SOX4 | AL136179 | Hs.643910 | chr6p22.3 | SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 4 |
| 203088_at | FBLN5 | NM_006329 | Hs.332708 | chr14q32.1 | Fibulin 5 |
| 200036_s_at | RPL10A | NM_007104 | Hs.546269 | chr6p21.3-p21.2 | Ribosomal protein L10a |
| 200053_at | SPAG7 | NM_004890 | Hs.90436 | chr17p13.2 | Sperm associated antigen 7 |
| 200018_at | RPS13 | NM_001017 | Hs.446588 | chr11p15 | Ribosomal protein S13 |
| 212271_at | MAPK1 | AA195999 | Hs.431850 | chr22q11.2 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 |
| 200763_s_at | RPLP1 | NM_001003 | Hs.356502 | chr15q22 | Ribosomal protein, large, P1 |
| 208822_s_at | DAP3 | U18321 | Hs.516746 | chr1q21-q22 | Death associated protein 3 |
| 214470_at | KLRB1 | NM_002258 | Hs.169824 | chr12p13 | Killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily B, member 1 |
| 217969_at | C11orf2 | NM_013265 | Hs.277517 | chr11q13 | Chromosome 11 open reading frame2 |
| 220753_s_at | CRYL1 | NM_015974 | Hs.370703 | chr13q12.11 | Crystallin, lambda 1 |
| 200602_at | APP | NM_000484 | Hs.651215 | chr21q21.2-21q21.3 | Amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein (peptidase nexin-II, Alzheimer disease) |
| 206343_s_at | NRG1 | NM_013959 | Hs.453951 | chr8p21-p12 | Neuregulin 1 |
| 203723_at | ITPKB | NM_002221 | Hs.528087 | chr1q42.13 | Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase B |
| 219700_at | PLXDC1 | NM_020405 | Hs.125036 | chr17q21.1 | Plexin domain containing 1 |
| 200099_s_at | RPS3A | AL356115 | Hs.356572 | chr4q31.2-q31.3 | Ribosomal protein S3A |
| 200013_at | RPL24 | NM_000986 | Hs.477028 | chr3q12 | Ribosomal protein L24 / / / ribosomal protein L24 |
| 201256_at | COX7A2L | NM_004718 | Hs.339639 | chr2p21 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIa polypeptide 2 like |
| 200716_x_at | RPL13A | NM_012423 | Hs.523185 | chr19q13.3 | Ribosomal protein L13a |
| 208591_s_at | PDE3B | NM_000922 | Hs.445711 | chr11p15.1 | Phosphodiesterase 3B, cGMP-inhibited |
| 204612_at | PKIA | NM_006823 | Hs.433700 | chr8q21.12 | Protein kinase (cAMP-dependent, catalytic) inhibitor alpha |
| 217989_at | HSD17B11 | NM_016245 | Hs.282984 | chr4q22.1 | Hydroxysteroid (17-beta) dehydrogenase 11 |
| 204628_s_at | ITGB3 | NM_000212 | Hs.218040 | chr17q21.32 | Integrin, beta 3 (platelet glycoprotein IIIa, antigen CD61) |
| 201968_s_at | PGM1 | NM_002633 | Hs.1869 | chr1p31 | Phosphoglucomutase 1 |
| 212063_at | CD44 | BE903880 | Hs.502328 | chr11p13 | CD44 molecule (Indian blood group) |
| 218918_at | MAN1C1 | NM_020379 | Hs.197043 | chr1p35 | Mannosidase, alpha, class 1C, member 1 |
| 200093_s_at | HINT1 | N32864 | Hs.483305 | chr5q31.2 | Histidine triad nucleotide binding protein 1 |
| 206220_s_at | RASA3 | NM_007368 | Hs.369188 | chr13q34 | RAS p21 protein activator 3 |
| 221564_at | PRMT2 | AL570294 | Hs.154163 | chr21q22.3 | Protein arginine methyltransferase 2 |
| 220948_s_at | ATP1A1 | NM_000701 | Hs.371889 | chr1p21 | ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, alpha 1 polypeptide |
| 211954_s_at | RANBP5 | BC000947 | Hs.643743 | chr13q32.2 | RAN binding protein 5 |
| 201350_at | FLOT2 | NM_004475 | Hs.514038 | chr17q11-q12 | Flotillin 2 |
| 202554_s_at | GSTM3 | AL527430 | Hs.2006 | chr1p13.3 | Glutathione S-transferase M3 (brain) |
| 221494_x_at | EIF3S12 | AF085358 | Hs.314359 | chr19q13.2 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 12 |
| 200962_at | RPL31 | AI348010 | Hs.647888 | chr2q11.2 | Ribosomal protein L31 |
| 201030_x_at | LDHB | NM_002300 | Hs.446149 | chr12p12.2-p12.1 | Lactate dehydrogenase B |
| 200644_at | MARCKSL1 | NM_023009 | Hs.75061 | chr1p35.1 | MARCKS-like 1 |
| 204490_s_at | CD44 | M24915 | Hs.502328 | chr11p13 | CD44 molecule (Indian blood group) |
| 204718_at | EPHB6 | NM_004445 | Hs.380089 | chr7q33-q35 | EPH receptor B6 |
| 210978_s_at | TAGLN2 | BC002616 | Hs.517168 | chr1q21-q25 | Transgelin 2 |
| 208852_s_at | CANX | AI761759 | Hs.651169 | chr5q35 | Calnexin |
| 220606_s_at | C17orf48 | NM_020233 | Hs.47668 | chr17p13.1 | Chromosome 17 open reading frame 48 |
| 206674_at | FLT3 | NM_004119 | Hs.507590 | chr13q12 | Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 |
| 204102_s_at | EEF2 | NM_001961 | Hs.515070 | chr19pter-q12 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 |
| 202247_s_at | MTA1 | BE561596 | Hs.525629 | chr14q32.3 | Metastasis associated 1 |
| 208692_at | RPS3 | U14990 | Hs.334176 | chr11q13.3-q13.5 | Ribosomal protein S3 |
| 200094_s_at | EEF2 | AI004246 | Hs.515070 | chr19pter-q12 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 |
| 217990_at | GMPR2 | NM_016576 | Hs.368855 | chr14q12 | Guanosine monophosphate reductase 2 |
| 200012_x_at | RPL21 | NM_000982 | Hs.632169 | chr13q12.2 | Ribosomal protein L21 |
| 200057_s_at | NONO | NM_007363 | Hs.533282 | chrXq13.1 | Non-POU domain containing, octamer-binding |
| 208796_s_at | CCNG1 | BC000196 | Hs.79101 | chr5q32-q34 | Cyclin G1 |
| 215739_s_at | TUBGCP3 | AJ003062 | Hs.224152 | chr13q34 | Tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 3 |
| 208478_s_at | BAX | NM_004324 | Hs.631546 | chr19q13.3-q13.4 | BCL2-associated X protein |
| 200674_s_at | RPL32 | NM_000994 | Hs.265174 | chr3p25-p24 | Ribosomal protein L32 |
| 208645_s_at | RPS14 | AF116710 | Hs.381126 | chr5q31-q33 | Ribosomal protein S14 |
| 212032_s_at | PTOV1 | AL046054 | –– | chr19q13.33 | Prostate tumor overexpressed gene 1 |
| 218338_at | PHC1 | NM_004426 | Hs.305985 | chr12p13 | Polyhomeotic homolog 1 (Drosophila) |
| 201432_at | CAT | NM_001752 | Hs.502302 | chr11p13 | Catalase |
| 202731_at | PDCD4 | NM_014456 | Hs.232543 | chr10q24 | Programmed cell death 4 (neoplastic transformation inhibitor) |
| 201118_at | PGD | NM_002631 | Hs.464071 | chr1p36.3-p36.13 | Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase |
| 212642_s_at | HIVEP2 | AL023584 | Hs.510172 | chr6q23-q24 | Human immunodeficiency virus type I enhancer binding protein 2 |
| 202736_s_at | LSM4 | AA112507 | Hs.515255 | chr19p13.11 | LSM4 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA associated (S. cerevisiae) |
| 208768_x_at | RPL22 | D17652 | Hs.515329 | chr1p36.3-p36.2 | Ribosomal protein L22 |
| 201049_s_at | RPS18 | NM_022551 | Hs.627414 | chr6p21.3 | Ribosomal protein S18 |
| 200074_s_at | RPL14 | U16738 | Hs.446522 | chr3p22-p21.2 | Ribosomal protein L14 |
| 65588_at | LOC388796 | AA827892 | Hs.400876 | chr20q11.23 | Hypothetical LOC388796 |
| 206686_at | PDK1 | NM_002610 | Hs.470633 | chr2q31.1 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 1 |
| 200022_at | RPL18 | NM_000979 | Hs.515517 | chr19q13 | Ribosomal protein L18 / / / ribosomal protein L18 |
| 201622_at | SND1 | NM_014390 | Hs.122523 | chr7q31.3 | Staphylococcal nuclease and tudor domain containing 1 |
| 217870_s_at | CMPK | NM_016308 | Hs.11463 | chr1p32 | Cytidylate kinase |
| 220773_s_at | GPHN | NM_020806 | Hs.208765 | chr14q23.3 | Gephyrin |
| 200804_at | TEGT | NM_003217 | Hs.35052 | chr12q12-q13 | Testis enhanced gene transcript (BAX inhibitor 1) |
| 202105_at | IGBP1 | NM_001551 | Hs.496267 | chrXq13.1-q13.3 | Immunoglobulin (CD79A) binding protein 1 |
| 200061_s_at | RPS24 | BC000523 | Hs.356794 | chr10q22-q23 | Ribosomal protein S24 / / / ribosomal protein S24 |
| 200095_x_at | RPS10 | AA320764 | Hs.645317 | chr6p21.31 | ribosomal protein S10 / / / ribosomal rotein S10 |
| 204892_x_at | EEF1A1 | NM_001402 | Hs.586423 | chr6q14.1 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 |
| 202213_s_at | CUL4B | AI650819 | Hs.102914 | chrXq23 | Cullin 4B |
| 200002_at | RPL35 | NM_007209 | Hs.182825 | chr9q34.1 | Ribosomal protein L35 / / / ribosomal protein L35 |
| 200990_at | TRIM28 | NM_005762 | Hs.467408 | chr19q13.4 | Tripartite motif-containing 28 |
| 203865_s_at | ADARB1 | NM_015833 | Hs.474018 | chr21q22.3 | Adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific, B1 (RED1 homolog rat) |
| 220001_at | PADI4 | NM_012387 | Hs.522969 | chr1p36.13 | Peptidyl arginine deiminase, type IV |
| 215813_s_at | PTGS1 | S36219 | Hs.201978 | chr9q32-q33.3 | Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1 |
| 208700_s_at | TKT | L12711 | Hs.89643 | chr3p14.3 | Transketolase (Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome) |
| 202990_at | PYGL | NM_002863 | Hs.282417 | chr14q21-q22 | Phosphorylase, glycogen |
| 212716_s_at | EIF3S12 | AW083133 | Hs.314359 | chr19q13.2 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit 12 |
| 209185_s_at | IRS2 | AF073310 | Hs.442344 | chr13q34 | Insulin receptor substrate 2 |
| 221989_at | RPL10 | AW057781 | Hs.534404 | chrXq28 | Ribosomal protein L10 |
| 214359_s_at | HSP90AB1 | AI218219 | Hs.509736 | chr6p12 | Heat shock protein 90kDa alpha (cytosolic), class B member 1 |
| 201393_s_at | IGF2R | NM_000876 | Hs.487062 | chr6q26 | Insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor |
| 201257_x_at | RPS3A | NM_001006 | Hs.356572 | chr4q31.2-q31.3 | Ribosomal protein S3A |
| 205408_at | MLLT10 | NM_004641 | Hs.30385 | chr10p12 | Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia (trithorax homolog, Drosophila) |
| 218679_s_at | VPS28 | NM_016208 | Hs.418175 | chr8q24.3 | Vacuolar protein sorting 28 homolog (S. cerevisiae) |
| 202096_s_at | TSPO | NM_000714 | Hs.202 | chr22q13.31 | Translocator protein (18 kDa) |
| 211558_s_at | DHPS | U26266 | Hs.79064 | chr19p13.2-p13.1 | Deoxyhypusine synthase |
| 205055_at | ITGAE | NM_002208 | Hs.513867 | chr17p13 | Integrin, alpha E (antigen CD103, human mucosal lymphocyte antigen 1 |
| 204867_at | GCHFR | NM_005258 | Hs.631717 | chr15q15 | GTP cyclohydrolase I feedback regulator |
| 200971_s_at | SERP1 | NM_014445 | Hs.518326 | chr3q25.1 | Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 1 |
| 203579_s_at | SLC7A6 | AI660619 | Hs.334848 | chr16q22.1 | Solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 6 |
| 39249_at | AQP3 | AB001325 | Hs.234642 | chr9p13 | Aquaporin 3 (Gill blood group) |
| 203408_s_at | SATB1 | NM_002971 | Hs.517717 | chr3p23 | Special AT-rich sequence binding protein 1 |
| 204454_at | LDOC1 | NM_012317 | Hs.45231 | chrXq27 | Leucine zipper, down-regulated in cancer 1 |
| 205026_at | STAT5B | NM_012448 | Hs.632256 | chr17q11.2 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B |
| 212257_s_at | SMARCA2 | AW131754 | Hs.298990 | chr9p22.3 | SWI/SNF related, matrix associated |
| 220500_s_at | RABL2B | NM_007082 | Hs.446425 | chr22q13.33 | RAB, member of RAS oncogene family-like 2B |
| 212400_at | FAM102A | AL043266 | Hs.568044 | chr9q34.11 | Family with sequence similarity 102, member A |
| 202974_at | MPP1 | NM_002436 | Hs.496984 | chrXq28 | Membrane protein, palmitoylated 1, 55 kDa |
| 213566_at | RNASE6 | NM_005615 | Hs.23262 | chr14q11.2 | Ribonuclease, RNase A family |
Footnotes
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. None of the authors has commercial or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest. The Affymetrix data sets used to derive the observations discussed in this article can be accessed at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ under the accession numbers: GSE 10924.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Pochyla for expert technical laboratory work and Dr. Gustavo Kijak and Mr. Eric Sanders-Buell, all of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation, for advice on the design and execution of RT-PCR. We also thank Dr. Jerome Kim, Armed Forces Research Institute of the Medical Sciences, Bangkok, for helpful advice in the initial stages of this work and Dr. Emil Lesho, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, for scrutiny of the final draft. This work was supported in part by Cooperative Agreement no. W81XWH-04-2-0005 between the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine. This work was supported by the Statistical and Data Management Center under the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease grant no. 5U01 AI38855 and in part by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant no. AI-68636. The parent ACTG study from which these samples were derived, was funded by grants: AI025915, AI027666, AI27670, AI25897, AI25868, RR00046, AI50410, AI46386, RR00047, AI 27665, RR00096, AI 27664, AI46381, AI032783, AI045008, AI27660, AI46370, AI 27673, A125903, AI27658, RR00044, AI27661, AI39156, and AI25859.
References
- 1.Carpenter CC. Fischl MA. Hammer SM, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel. JAMA. 1997;277:1962–1969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hammer SM. Saag MS. Schechter M, et al. Treatment for adult HIV infection: 2006 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel. JAMA. 2006;296:827–843. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.7.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boschi A. Tinelli C, Ortolani P, et al. CD4+ cell count guided treatment interruptions in chronic HIV infected patients with response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2004;18:2381–2389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ananworanich J. Gayet-Agenon A. LaBraz M, et al. CD4 guided scheduled treatment interruption compared to continuous therapy for patients infected with HIV-1: results of the Staccato randomized trial. Lancet. 2006;368:459–465. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69153-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cardiello PG. Hassink E. Ananworanich J, et al. A prospective randomized trial of structured treatment interruption for patients with chronic HIV type 1 infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:594–600. doi: 10.1086/427695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Skiest DJ. Su Z. Havlir DV, et al. Interruption of antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected patients with preserved immune function is associated with a low rate of clinical progression: a prospective study by AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5170. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:1426–1436. doi: 10.1086/512681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davey RT. Bhat N. Yoder C, et al. HIV-1, T cell dynamics after interruption of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in patients with a history of sustained viral suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:15109–15114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Delaugerre C. Valantin MA. Mouroux M, et al. Re-occurrence of HIV-1 drug mutations after treatment re-initiation following interruption in patients with multiple treatment failure. AIDS. 2001;15:2189–2191. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200111090-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miller V. Sabin C. Hertogs K, et al. Virological, immunological effects of treatment interruptions in HIV-1 infected patients with treatment failure. AIDS. 2000;14:2857–2867. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200012220-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaufmann DE. Lichterfeld M. Altfeld M, et al. Limited durability of viral control following treated acute HIV infection. PLoS Med. 2004;1:137–147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oxenius A. McLean AR. Fischer M, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus specific CD8+ T cell responses do not predict viral growth, clearance rates during structured intermittent antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2002;76:10169–10176. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.20.10169-10176.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oxenius A. Price DA. Gunthard HF, et al. Stimulation of HIV specific cellular immunity by structured treatment interruption fails to enhance viral control in chronic HIV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13747–13752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202372199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ortiz GM. Wellons M. Brancato J, et al. Structured antiretroviral treatment interruptions in chronically HIV-infected subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13288–13293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221452198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lempicki RA. Kovacs JA. Baseleer MW, et al. Impact of HIV-1 infection and highly active antiretroviral therapy on the kinetics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell turnover in HIV-infected patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:1377–13783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250472097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Frost SDW. Martinez-Picado J. Ruiz L. Clotet B. Leigh Brown AJ. Viral dynamics during structured treatment interruptions of chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 2002;76:968–979. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.3.968-979.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ruiz L. Carcelain G. Martinez-Picado J, et al. HIV dynamics and T cell immunity after three structured treatment interruptions in chronic HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2001;15:F19–F27. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200106150-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garcia F. Plana M. Vidal C, et al. Dynamics of viral load rebound and immunological changes after stopping effective antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1999;13:F79–F86. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199907300-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Papasasvvas E. Kostman JR. Mounzer K, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of therapy interruption in chronic HIV-infection. PLoS Med. 2004;1:218–228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Molto J. Ruiz L. Romeu J, et al. Influence of prior structured treatment interruptions on the length of time without antiretroviral treatment in chronically HIV-infected subjects. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;12:1283–1288. doi: 10.1089/aid.2004.20.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lawrence J. Mayers DL. Huppler-Hullsiek K, et al. Structured treatment interruption in patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:837–846. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steeck H. Jessen H. Alter G, et al. Immunological and virological impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy initiated during acute HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:734–739. doi: 10.1086/503811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schweighardt B. Ortiz GM. Grant RM, et al. Emergence of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants in patients undergoing structured treatment interruptions. AIDS. 2002;16:2342–2344. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200211220-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Koup RA. Reconsidering early HIV treatment and supervised treatment interruptions. PLoS Med. 2004;1:109–110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.El-Sadr WM. Members of the SMART Study Group. CD4+ Count-Guided Interruption of Antiretroviral Treatment the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2283–2296. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vahey MT. Nau ME. Taubman M, et al. Patterns of gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of rhesus macaques infected with SIVmac251 and exhibiting differential rates of disease expression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003;19:369–387. doi: 10.1089/088922203765551728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li C. Wong W. Model based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:31–36. doi: 10.1073/pnas.011404098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Irizarry RA. Bolstad BM. Collin F, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tusher VG. Tibshirani R. Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dennis G. Sherman BT. Hosack DA, et al. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003;4:P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tibshirani R. Hastie T. Narasimhan B. Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6567–6572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082099299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Silvestri G. Fedanov A. Germon S, et al. Divergent host responses during primary simian immunodeficiency virus SIVsm infection of natural sooty mangabey and nonnatural rhesus macaque hosts. J Virol. 2005;79:4043–4054. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.7.4043-4054.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choudhary SK. Vrisekoop N. Jansen CA, et al. Low immune activation despite high levels of pathogenic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 results in long term asymptomatic disease. J Virol. 2007;81:8838–8842. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02663-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vojtek AB. Der CJ. Increasing complexity of the Ras signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:19925–19928. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.19925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cox AD. Der CJ. The dark side of Ras: regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003;22:8999–9006. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kolch W. Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. Biochem J. 2000;351:289–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chang F. Steelman LS. Shelton JG, et al. Regulation of cell cycle progression, apoptosis by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway (review) Int J Oncol. 2002;22:469–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Blum R. Kloog Y. Tailoring Ras pathway inhibitor combinations for cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2005;8:369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bonni A. Brunet A. West AE. Sandeep RD. Takasu MA. Greenberg ME. Cell survival promoted by the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway by transcription dependent and independent mechanisms. Science. 1999;286:1358–1362. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5443.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Downward J. Ras signaling and apoptosis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998;8:49–54. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80061-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen CY. Liou J. Forman LW. Faller DV. Differential regulation of discrete apoptotic pathways by Ras. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16700–16709. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.27.16700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.van Grevenynghe J. Procopio FA. He Z, et al. Transcription factor FOXO3a controls the persistence of memory CD4+ T cells during HIV infection. Nat Med. 2008;14:266–274. doi: 10.1038/nm1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





