Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jul 15;133(31):11912–11915. doi: 10.1021/ja204758c

Rapid, Photoactivatable Turn-On Fluorescent Probes Based On an Intramolecular Photoclick Reaction

Zhipeng Yu 1, Lok Yin Ho 1, Qing Lin 1,*
PMCID: PMC3150427  NIHMSID: NIHMS310710  PMID: 21736329

Abstract

Photoactivatable fluorescent probes are invaluable tools for the study of biological processes with high resolution in space and time. Numerous strategies have been developed in generating photoactivatable fluorescent probes, most of which rely on the photo-“uncaging” and photoisomerization reactions. To broaden photoactivation modalities, here we report a new strategy in which the fluorophore is generated in situ through an intramolecular tetrazole-alkene cycloaddition reaction (“photoclick chemistry”). By conjugating a specific microtubule-binding taxoid core to the tetrazole/alkene pre-fluorophores, robust photoactivatable fluorescent probes were obtained with fast photoactivation (~1 min) and high fluorescence turn-on ratio (up to 112-fold) in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1). Highly efficient photoactivation of the taxoid-tetrazoles inside the mammalian cells was also observed under a confocal fluorescent microscope when the treated cells were exposed to either a mercury lamp light passing through a 300/395 filter or a 405 nm laser beam. Furthermore, a spatially controlled fluorescent labeling of microtubules in live CHO cells was demonstrated with a long-wavelength photoactivatable taxoid-tetrazole probe. Because of its modular design and tunability of the photoactivation efficiency and photophysical properties, this intramolecular photoclick reaction based approach should provide a versatile platform for designing photoactivatable fluorescent probes for various biological processes.


Photoactivatable small-molecule fluorescent probes have become an indispensable tool for microscopic studies of biomolecular dynamics in living cells, tissues and animals.1 Several strategies have been reported for the design of photoactivatable organic fluorophores, including reversibly photoactivatable fluorophores based on a light-induced bond-breaking and thermal bond-reforming process;2 photo-uncaging of “caged” fluorophores such as fluoresceins,3 coumarins,4 rhodamine,5 and FRET-based dyes;6 photorelease of fluorophores from quenchers via cleavage of the photolabile linkers;7 and photoswitching of the spiropyran-merocyanine-based nanoparticles.8 In these systems, the latent fluorophores are already in place, which may compromise the photoactivation efficiency due to the filtering effect.9 Furthermore, recent advance in the super-resolution microscopic techniques such as PALM10 and STORM11 also demands new strategies for designing photoactivatable fluorophores with increased biocompatibility, excellent turn-on efficiency, and greater flexibility in bioconjugation. An elegant example is the development of photoactivatable azido-DCDHF fluorophores by Moerner and coworkers that exhibit very high turn-on ratios in fluorescence (up to 1270-fold) and are suitable for super-resolution imaging of targeted proteins in live cells.12

We have recently reported a bioorthogonal chemistry strategy for fluorescent labeling of proteins in live cells based on a photoinduced tetrazole-alkene cycloaddition reaction (“photoclick chemistry”).13 Fluorescent pyrazoline cycloadducts were formed after the reactions, ensuring that only alkene- or tetrazole-pretagged proteins were labeled. Because the cycloaddition rate was modest (with k2 values up to 10 M−1 s−1), relatively high concentrations of reagents (~100 µM) were typically required for labeling in the intracellular environment. To achieve faster fluorescent labeling at reduced reagent concentrations, we reasoned that an intramolecular photoclick reaction of a pre-fluorophore containing both the tetrazole and the alkene functionalities would greatly increase the reaction rate, resulting in rapid turn-on fluorescence for more efficient protein visualization in vivo. To demonstrate this approach, herein we report the design, synthesis, and photophysical characterization of a class of ligand-directed, photoactivatable, turn-on fluorescent probes for the spatially controlled imaging of microtubules in live mammalian cells.

We decided to design turn-on fluorescent probes for imaging microtubules because (i) microtubules exhibit dynamic instability and are responsible for spatial organization and rapid remodeling of the cytoskeleton during cell division,14 and (ii) specific microtubule-binding molecules such as paclitaxel15 and its fluorescent derivatives16 have been used in the study of microtubule motility in vivo. A series of taxoid-tetrazoles 1–4 were thus synthesized (Scheme S1–S4 in Supporting Information) in which 7-β-alanyltaxol core17 is conjugated to the para-position of the C-phenyl ring of two water-soluble tetrazoles bearing an O-allyl group at N-phenyl ring via a variable flexible linker (Scheme 1). We expect that upon photoirradiation, tetrazoles would undergo rapid cycloreversion reaction to generate reactive nitrile imine dipoles which spontaneously react with the pre-aligned allyl group to form the pyrazoline fluorophores. The substituted amines or amides on the N-phenyl ring and the various linkers at the C-phenyl ring serve to fine-tune the reactivity of the tetrazoles as well as the photophysical properties of the resulting pyrazoline fluorophores. To our satisfaction, nearly quantitative conversions for the taxoid-tetrazoles 1–4 were observed based on HPLC analysis of the reaction mixtures after photoirradiation using a 302 nm handheld UV lamp (UVM, 0.16 AMPS, 2.3 mW/cm2)18 for merely 60–70 sec (Figure S1–S4).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Design of photoactivatable turn-on fluorescent probes 1–4 for microtubules comprising of a 7-β-alanyltaxol core and a tetrazole pre-fluorophore core.

To determine the magnitude of fluorescence turn-on effect, the corresponding taxoid-pyrazolines 1a–4a were purified to homogeneity and their photophysical properties were measured along with those of taxoid-tetrazoles 1–4 (Figures S5–S10). As shown in Table 1, the N, N-dihydroxyethylamino substituted taxoidtetrazoles (1 and 2) showed a bathochromic shift in λmax compared to the glycolamide substituted ones (3 and 4) in acetonitrile/PBS buffer (1:1), consistent with what we observed previously.19 However, taxoid-tetrazoles 3 and 4 showed higher coefficients at their λmax. On the other hand, the taxoid-pyrazolines showed significant bathochromic shift, with λmax ranging from 330 nm to 358 nm. Whereas none of the taxoid-tetrazoles was fluorescent, broad emission spectra were obtained for all taxoid-pyrazolines, with λem ranging from 528 nm for 4a to 617 nm for 1a. The fluorescent properties of taxoid-pyrazolines appeared to be solvent-dependent; for example, the fluorescence quantum yields of 1a and 2a jumped from 0.0024 and 0.0041 in ACN-mixed PBS buffer to 0.036 and 0.022 in DCM, respectively (compare Figure S6 to S5; Figure S8 to S7). Interestingly, taxoid-pyrazolines 3a and 4a exhibited significantly higher fluorescence quantum yields in ACN/PBS buffer (1:1), with ΦF values to be 0.034 and 0.056, respectively. Because of the difference in their brightness, the four taxoid-tetrazoles showed varying degrees of fluorescence turn-on effect, ranging from 21-fold for photoactivation of 1 to 112-fold for photoactivation of 4 in ACN/PBS buffer (1:1) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Photophysical properties of the taxoid-pyrazolines and fluorescence turn-on efficiencya

Com-
pound
λmax
b
(nm)
εc
(M−1cm−1)
ε405d
(M−1cm−1)
λem
(nm)
ΦFe Fluorescence
turn-onf
1 310 6,400 460 ND ND -
1a 330 5,100 2,000 617 0.0024 21-fold
1ag 340 4,400 1,600 580 0.036 34-fold
2 311 12,000 540 ND ND -
2a 332 8,700 3,000 614 0.0041 30-fold
2ag 344 11,600 4,700 587 0.022 101-fold
3 262h 24,400 ND ND ND -
3a 358 12,900 6,900 584 0.034 111-fold
4 276h 30,300 ND ND ND -
4a 336 16,400 3,100 528 0.056 112-fold
a

Compounds were dissolved in ACN/PBS (1:1) to derive concentrations of 25 µM unless noted otherwise.

b

λmax in the 300 ~ 500 nm region.

c

Extinction coefficient at λmax.

d

Extinction coefficient at 405 nm.

e

Quantum yields were measured using DAPI as a standard (see ref. 20), and integrated over 415–790 nm.

f

Obtained by comparing the emission intensities at λem; λex = 405 nm.

g

Dissolved in DCM.

h

λmax in the 250 ~ 500 nm region.

ND = not detected.

It is known that the modification of paclitaxel on position-7 does not affect its binding to β-tubulins,16 the building blocks for polymeric microtubules. To investigate whether this is also true for our pyrazoline-modified taxoids, HeLa cells were treated with 5 µM of pre-activated taxoid-pyrazoline 1a for 30 min. After cell fixation and permeabilization, the binding of taxoid-pyrazoline 1a to microtubules was confirmed by confocal fluorescent microscopy in which the distribution of pyrazoline fluorescence overlaid nicely with that of an Alexa Fluor-568 based immunostain for microtubules (Figure S11). Conversely, since the binding of taxoid to β-tubulins may bring the hydrophobic pyrazoline fluorophores to the microtubule surface, it is also possible that the photophysical properties of taxoid-pyrazolines may be altered. To probe this possibility, CHO cells were treated with 1 µM of the pre-activated taxoid-pyrazolines 1a–4a for 30 min, and the taxoid-pyrazoline fluorescence upon binding to microtubules was examined with a spectrum-scan confocal microscope. To our surprise, among the four taxoid-pyrazolines, compounds 1a and 3a showed moderate and strong fluorescent labeling of microtubules, respectively (Figure 1), while compounds 2a and 4a showed very weak intracellular fluorescence (Figure S12). This drastic difference in fluorescent properties apparently is dependent on the linker length; the long flexible linkers such as those in 2a and 4a (Scheme 1) possibly position the pyrazoline fluorophores in a protein environment where their fluorescences are quenched. A closer examination of in-cell fluorescence spectra revealed that the peak emission wavelengths have shifted from 617 nm to around 569 nm for 1a (Figure 1c), and from 584 nm to 543 nm for 3a (Figure 1f). These hypsochromic shifts are presumably due to the interactions of the pyrazoline fluorophores with the microtubule surface, and have been observed previously for the fluoresce-in-conjugated taxols.16b As expected, taxoid-pyrazoline 3a is a brighter fluorescent probe than 1a as it showed a higher fluorescence intensity inside CHO cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Confocal spectrum-scan micrographs of taxoid-pyrazoline labeled microtubules in live CHO cells. CHO cells were treated with 1 µM of taxoid-pyrazoline 1a (a, b) or 3a (d, e) for 30 min and the fluorescence spectrum-scan in the region of 428–608 nm (a, d) and the corresponding DIC images (b, e) were recorded with a Zeiss LSM 710 microscope; λex = 405 nm. The colors rendered in the fluorescence micrographs were λ-encoded (real color). Scale bar = 20 µm. The average intensities of the unsaturated fluorescence-labeled cytoskeleton areas in 10 selected cells were plotted to give the in-cell fluorescence spectrum of 1a (c) or 3c (f) along with the standard deviations.

Based on the in-cell spectrum scan results, taxoid-tetrazoles 1 and 3 were selected and their photoactivation kinetics in vitro was examined (Figure 2). Because taxoid-tetrazole 1 showed broad absorption, we carried out the photoactivation using a 365 nm handheld UV lamp (3.5 mW/cm2). Figure 2a shows that a complete conversion to the desired taxoid-pyrazoline 1a was achieved in 320 sec, as evidenced by gradual increase in a new absorption band centered at 330 nm and a broad emission band centered at 617 nm. On the other hand, since taxoid-tetrazole 3 showed almost no absorption at 365 nm, it was subjected to 302 nm photoirradiation (2.3 mW/cm2). Gratifyingly, complete conversion to fluorescent taxoid-pyrazoline 3a was achieved in 40 sec, with the pyrazoline product showing an absorption band at 358 nm and a strong emission band at 584 nm (Figure 2b). Overall, these two taxoid-tetrazoles offer complementary features as photoactivatable turn-on fluorophores: tetrazole 3 exhibits robust turn-on effect and higher brightness; while tetrazole 1 can be activated with long-wavelength light (365 nm), which makes it potentially suitable for laser-scanning fluorescent microscopy studies with improved spatiotemporal resolution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Time courses of photoactivation of taxoid-tetrazole 1 (a) or 3 (b) monitored by UV-vis (dashed lines) and fluorescence (solid lines). Compounds were dissolved in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1) to derive concentrations of 25 µM, and the photoirradiation wavelength was set at 365 nm for 1 and 302 nm for 3. For fluorescence, λex = 405 nm.

To examine whether taxoid-tetrazoles can be photoactivated in vivo, CHO cells were treated with 1 µM of taxoid-tetrazole 3 for 30 min and after washing with pre-warmed PBS three times, the treated cells were illuminated continuously with a metal halide light source (EXFO-XCite®, 25% of 13.3 mW/cm2) through a filter with bandwidth of 300/395 nm, and the in situ formed taxoid-pyrazoline fluorescent signals were recorded with an acquisition window of 535–545 nm. A rapid, roughly 12-fold increase in fluorescence in the CHO cytosols was detected after 5-sec photoirradiation (compare fluorescence intensity at 5 sec to background fluorescence at 0 sec; Figure 3). By comparing the fluorescence intensity at 5 sec to the maximal intensity for the taxoidpyrazoline 3a (Figure 1f), a calculated 79% yield was derived for the photoactivation in vivo. The fluorescence intensities decreased over the extended photoirradiation; however, 56% of fluorescence signals still remained after 30 sec photoirradiation, indicating that the pyrazoline fluorophore 3a is fairly resistant to photo-bleaching. The photo-bleaching rate of 3a was similar to that of DAPI measured under the identical microscopic conditions (Figure S13).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time course of the photoactivation of taxoid-tetrazole 3 in live CHO cells. (a) Time-lapsed confocal micrographs of tetrazole-treated CHO cells after photo-illumination, scale bar = 20 µm. Cells were treated with 1 µM of taxoid-tetrazole 3 for 30 min before photo-illumination. ZEISS filter set #49 was used for incident light filtering; for fluorescence, λex = 405 nm. (b) Plot of the changes of fluorescence of 3a over a period of 30 sec. For each time points, the intensities of unsaturated fluorescence inside cytosols of 10 individual cells were used in the calculation of the averaged intensities and the standard deviations.

Since taxoid-tetrazole 1 shows 365-nm photoactivatability and its UV-vis absorption extends into 405 nm (albeit weak), a laser wavelength available in our microscope, we decided to examine whether photoactivation can be carried out with the 405-nm laser, which would allow a spatiotemporal control over the in situ fluorescence generation. Thus, CHO cells were treated with 10 µM of taxoid-tetrazole 1 for 30 min and then washed with pre-warmed PBS three times. Then, a select subpopulation of cells in the optical field (an area circled in the red rectangle in Figure 4) was subjected to a brief (11 sec) 405-nm diode laser irradiation (30 mW) at 100% power while the cells outside the selected area were not. Afterwards, the entire population was scanned for fluorescence emissions with excitation at 405 nm at 20% power. Strong turn-on fluorescence was detected for cells within the rectangular area, in sharp contrast to the weak fluorescence background for cells outside the activation area (Figure 4). Quantification of cytosolic fluorescence intensity in CHO cells revealed 7-fold enhancement in fluorescence for the activated cells relative to the unactivated cells. With this photoactivatable microtubule fluorescent probe, in principal it should be possible in the future to label microtubules asymmetrically within a single cell and identify factors that break cellular symmetry during the cell division.21

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Spatially controlled photoactivation of taxoid-tetrazole 1 in CHO cells. Cells were treated with 10 µM of taxoid-tetrazole 1 for 30 min and then washed three times with pre-warmed PBS. Cells in the red rectangle area were exposed to 405-nm laser at 30 mW for 11 sec followed by fluorescence acquisition, λex = 405 nm. For confocal micrographs, scale bar = 20 µm. For the plot, the fluorescence intensities from the cytosols of all the activated cells inside the red rectangle area were quantified using ImageJ program and compared to the fluorescence intensities for the unactivated cells.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new strategy for designing turn-on fluorescent probes in which a protein-targeting core is linked to a photoactivatable, alkene-appended tetrazole. Using the tetrazole-modified taxoids as a model, robust fluorescence turn-on (up to 112-fold) was observed within ~1 minute after the intramolecular photoclick reaction under the 302 nm photoirradiation in acetonitrile/PBS buffer (1:1). Two taxoid-tetrazoles with short linkers, 1 and 3, showed extremely fast photoinduced cycloaddition inside living cells (in seconds), producing strong pyrazoline fluorescent probes in situ for cytosolic microtubules. Moreover, taxoid-tetrazole 1 can be activated using 405 nm laser as the photoactivation light source, enabling a spatially controlled fluorescent labeling of microtubules in living cells. Compared to the photo-uncaging approach, this photoclick chemistry based approach produces N2 as the only side product, which is non-toxic to cells. Furthermore, the fluorescent properties of the resulting pyrazoline fluorophores are highly tunable,22 e.g., through the appendage of other alkene dipolarophiles. By employing a ‘scaffold hopping’ strategy23 we reported recently, it should be possible to further improve the photoactivation efficiency, e.g., by increasing absorption at 405 nm through the use of other aromatic scaffolds, and obtain turn-on pyrazoline fluorophores with increased brightness and photostability.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We gratefully acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM 085092) for financial support, Alan Siegel at the SUNY Buffalo Biological Sciences Imaging Facility for assistance in microscopy, and the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation grant (DBI-0923133) for instrumentation support.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information. Supplemental figures, synthetic schemes and experimental procedures, confocal micrographs, and characterization of all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fernandez-Suarez M, Ting AY. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:929–943. doi: 10.1038/nrm2531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Folling J, Belov V, Kunetsky R, Medda R, Schonle A, Egner A, Eggeling C, Bossi M, Hell SW. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:6266–6270. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krafft GA, Sutton WR, Cummings RT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:301–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Y, Zheng Q, Dakin K, Xu K, Martinez ML, Li WH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:4653–4663. doi: 10.1021/ja036958m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gee KR, Weinberg ES, Kozlowski DJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001;11:2181–2183. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00421-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zheng G, Guo YM, Li WH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:10616–10617. doi: 10.1021/ja071427+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maurel D, Banala S, Laroche T, Johnsson K. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010;5:507–516. doi: 10.1021/cb1000229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hu D, Tian Z, Wu W, Wan W, Li ADQ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:15279–15281. doi: 10.1021/ja805948u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keating AE, Garcia-Garibay MA. In: Organic and Inorganic Photochemistry. Ramamurthy V, Schanze K, editors. Vol. 2. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1998. pp. 195–248. and references therein. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Science. 2006;313:1642–1645. doi: 10.1126/science.1127344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. Nat. Methods. 2006;3:793–795. doi: 10.1038/nmeth929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee HL, Lord SJ, Iwanaga S, Zhan K, Xie H, Williams JC, Wang H, Bowman GR, Goley ED, Shapiro L, Twieg RJ, Rao J, Moerner WE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:15099–15101. doi: 10.1021/ja1044192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Song W, Wang Y, Qu J, Lin Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:9654–9655. doi: 10.1021/ja803598e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang Y, Song W, Hu WJ, Lin Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:5330–5333. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Song W, Wang Y, Yu Z, Vera CI, Qu J, Lin Q. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010;5:875–885. doi: 10.1021/cb100193h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Song W, Yu Z, Madden MM, Lin Q. Mol. Biosys. 2010;6:1576–1578. doi: 10.1039/c003470c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desai A, Mitchison TJ. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997;13:83–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Nicolaou KC, Dai WM, Guy RK. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994;33:15–44. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yvon AMC, Wadsworth P, Jordan MA. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999;10:947–959. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.4.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Souto AA, Acuña U, Andreu JM, Barasoain I, Abal M, Amat-Guerri F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995;34:2710–2712. [Google Scholar]; (b) Díaz JF, Strobe R, Engelborghs Y, Souto AA, Andreu JM. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26265–26276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003120200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guy RK, Scott ZA, Sloboda RD, Nicolaou KC. Chem. Biol. 1996;3:1021–1031. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(96)90168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Light energy was measured by placing a FieldMaster™ GS energy analyzer equipped with LM-10 HTD power meter sensor 2-cm away from the lamp.
  • 19.Wang Y, Hu WJ, Song W, Lim RKV, Lin Q. Org. Lett. 2008;10:3725–3728. doi: 10.1021/ol801350r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) Du H, Fuh RCA, Li J, Corkan LA, Lindsey JS. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998;68:141–142. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hard T, Fan P, Kearns DR. Photochem. Photobiol. 1990;51:77–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mullins RD. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010;2 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003392. a003392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fahrni CJ, Yang L, Van Derveer DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:3799–3812. doi: 10.1021/ja028266o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu Z, Ho LY, Wang Z, Lin Q. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES