Summary
It is known that evolution by selection on new or standing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vitamin K 2,3-epoxide reductase subcomponent 1 (vkorc1) of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) can cause resistance to anticoagulant rodenticides such as warfarin [1–3]. Here we report an introgression in European M. m. domesticus spanning as much as ~20.3 megabases (Mb) and including vkorc1, the molecular target of anticoagulants [1–4], that stems from hybridization with the Algerian mouse (M. spretus). We show that in the laboratory the homozygous complete vkorc1 allele of M. spretus confers resistance when introgressed into M. m. domesticus. Consistent with selection on the introgression after the introduction of rodenticides in the 1950s we document historically adaptive population genetics of vkorc1 in M. m. domesticus. Furthermore, we detected adaptive protein evolution of vkorc1 in the M. spretus lineage (Ka/Ks=1.54–1.93) resulting in radical amino-acid substitutions that apparently have anticoagulant tolerance of M. spretus as pleiotropic effect. Thus, positive selection produced an adaptive, divergent and pleiotropic vkorc1 allele in the donor species, M. spretus, which crossed a species barrier where it is expressed as adaptive trait in the recipient species, M. m. domesticus. Resistant house mice originated from selection on new or standing vkorc1 polymorphisms and from selection on vkorc1 polymorphisms acquired by adaptive introgressive hybridization.
Results and Discussion
Warfarin is used as a blood-thinning drug in medicine and as an anticoagulant rodenticide [5]. It inhibits the vitamin K epoxide reductase enzyme complex (VKOR) essential for vitamin K recycling and blood coagulation [6]. The vitamin K epoxide reductase subcomponent 1 (vkorc1) encodes the warfarin-sensitive component of VKOR [1, 4]. DNA sequence analyses showed that genetic variations in vkorc1 determine the physiological response of humans and rodents to warfarin [2, 3, 7]. Currently at least 16 non-synonymous SNPs at 10 positions in vkorc1 have been confirmed by in vitro and/or in vivo studies to alter blood clotting kinetics and/or in vitro VKOR activities in humans and rodents in response to exposure to anticoagulants [2]; additional SNPs in vkorc1 await such experimental proof. A mere ~10 years after the inception of warfarin as rodenticide in the 1950s reports of resistant Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) emerged between 1960–1969, followed by reports of resistant house mice (M. musculus spp.) in 1964, roof rats (R. rattus) in 1972, and other rat species (e.g. R. tiomanicus, R. r. diardii, R. losea) [3, 8–10]. Resistant rodent colonies have been discovered in Europe, the Americas, Asia, and Australia [8]. In response to such warfarin-resistant colonies other anticoagulant rodenticides were developed that target the VKOR, including coumatetralyl, bromadiolone, and difenacoum. However, resistance to these has also evolved in rats and mice. The degree, to which vkorc1-mediated resistance has convergently evolved in different rodent pest species, and in different populations within each species, illustrates how large natural rodent populations can respond to selection on novel and/or standing genetic variants.
In house mice (M. musculus spp.) ten non-synonymous SNPs at nine positions in vkorc1 are now known (Fig. 1A). Of these, nine were previously published [2, 3] and a novel one is reported here (Fig. 1A). Foremost, however, here we report that in mice at least four of 10 (40%) non-synonymous SNPs at four of nine (~45%) positions of vkorc1 were introduced into the M. m. domesticus genome by adaptive introgressive hybridization with M. spretus (Fig. 1A). We use the term adaptive introgressive hybridization [11] to describe the naturally occurring process that includes inter-specific mating (hybridization) followed by generations of backcrossing (introgression) and selection on introgressed alleles if these are expressed as advantageous traits at some point of their sojourn times. Changes in ecological settings, such as sudden rodenticide exposure, can render initially effectively neutral alleles adaptive [11].
Figure 1.
A) Shown are the variable positions defining 20 vkorc1 genotypes identified in the transcribed sequences of 106 Western European house mice (M. musculus domesticus) (no variants were detected in 5′ UTR). DNA Sanger-sequencing and alignments to vkorc1 of the Algerian mouse (M. spretus) were done. Intron sequences were determined whenever possible (i.e. not obscured by insertion/deletion polymorphisms) and used to infer whether ambiguous transcript sequences were of M. m. domesticus origin or were M. spretus. M. m. domesticus C57BL/6J and M. spretus shown on the top and bottom, respectively. We define genotypes as vkorc1dom if no traces of any M. spretus polymorphisms could be detected in the coding and non-coding regions of the gene (genotypes 1–6). The vkorc1 genotypes that correspond to the vkorc1 sequence of M. spretus fully (genotype 20), or contain any discernible M. spretus variants either in form of heterozygosity and/or intragenic recombination in any part of the coding and non-coding portion of the gene (genotypes 8–19) are defined as vkorc1spr. Ambiguous genotypes that contain vkorc1 of M. m. domesticus (exons 1–2) but could not be assigned to either species in the 3 prime portion of the gene (green, pooled as genotype 7). Dots depict nucleotide states identical to C57BL/6J. Hyphens depict insertions/deletions. Empty fields depict missing information (but confirmed as either vkorc1dom or vkorc1spr based on flanking non-coding sequences [16]), and ‘?’ depict missing information that could not be assigned to either species based on flanking sequences. The standard nucleotide ambiguity and amino acid one-letter codes apply. Countries and genotype counts are shown in the right panel (n.a.–not applicable). Populations Spain-1 and -2 are listed separately because we analyzed these in more detail (see text). Asterisks mark those amino-acid variants and positions present in M. musculus and known to affect warfarin tolerance in rodents or humans [2, 3] (Y139C/S variants were not detected by us). The newly discovered W59L SNP affects a position in vkorc1 known to alter warfarin tolerance in form of a W59R non-synonymous SNP in Rattus norvegicus [2]. B) Distribution of vkorc1 genotypes in Western European M. m. domesticus. The hatched area depicts the native range of M. spretus [12]. The house mouse has become a cosmopolitan species and now is occurring across the entire area depicted and beyond [29]. Pie charts show the frequencies of pure vkorc1 of M. m. domesticus origin (vkorc1dom) (pink, genotypes 1–6 in A), genotypes that correspond to the complete M. spretus vkorc1 allele or share parts of it in form of heterozygosity and/or intragenic recombination (all vkorc1spr, yellow, genotypes 8–20 in A). Countries sampled are shaded in grey. Sampling locations (some overlapping due to proximity) are shown as triangles (pink–vkorc1spr absent, yellow - vkorc1spr present). C.f. Table S1 for sample information and Table S2 for PCR and sequencing primers.
We studied patterns of vkorc1 introgression between M. spretus and M. m. domesticus from across Western Europe (Fig. 1B; c.f. Table S1). M. spretus separated from M. musculus spp. ~1.5 to 3 million years ago [12]. The species are more strongly reproductively isolated than is predicted by Haldane’s Rule [13, 14], i.e. in addition to all male offspring female offspring also can be sterile depending on the direction of the cross, and the two species tend to remain ecologically and behaviorally separated even when allopatric [14]. These species are partially sympatric and can hybridize in Africa and Europe [15], but elsewhere M. m. domesticus is allopatric (Fig. 1B).
We found that M. m. domesticus from Spain and Germany carry the complete or partial vkorc1 allele of M. spretus (vkorc1spr). Heterozygous individuals and intragenic recombinants occur (Fig. 1A), which we also designated as vkorc1spr to reflect that these contain sequences derived from M. spretus. The vkorc1 of M. m. domesticus (vkorc1dom) differs from vkorc1spr by at least four non-synonymous SNPs and by ~1.24% –1.39% across the entire gene (Fig. 1A and [16]). DNA sequence analysis of vkorc1 of 106 M. m. domesticus revealed that only 59/106 (55.7%) mice carry vkorc1 genotypes identifiable as comprised solely out of M. m. domesticus (vkorc1dom) sequences (genotypes 1–6; Fig. 1). However, 43/106 (40.6%) mice carry vkorc1 genotypes that across the entire length of vkorc1 (N=10; genotypes 14–20), or parts of it (N=33; genotypes 8–13), correspond to the allele of M. spretus, all designated as vkorc1spr (Fig. 1). Four (3.8%) similar genotypes could not be assigned with confidence across the entire length of the gene to either species (pooled as genotype 7; Fig. 1).
In our sample from Spain only 2/29 (6.9%) mice carry pure vkorc1dom (genotype 1); all others (27/29 or 93.1%) carry vkorc1spr genotypes that across the entire (N=6, genotypes 14–20) or parts of vkorc1 (N=21; genotypes 8–10) correspond to the M. spretus allele (Fig. 1). In Germany, 4/50 (8%) mice carry vkorc1spr genotype 20 that matches up over the entire length with the M. spretus allele, and 12/50 (24%) samples carry vkorc1spr (genotypes 8, 11–13) that match up over parts of the vkorc1 allele of M. spretus. Thus, in the area where M. m. domesticus and M. spretus could hybridize the vast majority of house mice carry vkorc1spr, and even in the distant Germany where house mice are allopatric, 32% of mice carry vkorc1spr.
To examine whether we observe hybridization between M. spretus and M. m. domesticus (e.g. as in [15]) or, specifically vkorc1 introgression, we partially sequenced 18 nuclear genes on chromosome 7, including vkorc1 and its 5′ region, and 6 nuclear genes on five other chromosomes from 10 M. m. domesticus from Germany and Spain, as well as M. spretus (Fig. 2A; c.f. Table S2). These sequence comparisons distinguish 10 genome profiles (I–X; Fig. 2B) and delineate ~20.3 Mbs of chromosome 7 where M. spretus sequence variants can be detected in some M. m. domesticus, i.e. sequence similarity between both species is much higher, or sequences are identical, than is for genes on other chromosomes or genes more distantly linked to vkorc1. Recombination, including intragenic recombination (e.g. in vkorc1; c.f. Fig. 1A), has taken place throughout the region that carries M. spretus variants (Fig. 2C). However, high levels of linkage disequilibrium remain (Fig. S1A and B). Analysis of introgressed and recombining nuclear sequences using phylogenetic methods [17] in our case are expected to result in gene genealogies where M. m. domesticus should be paraphyletic with respect to M. spretus (i.e. the M. spretus sequence is nested within M. m. domesticus sequences) or are poorly resolved. For vkorc1 and for genes closely linked to vkorc1 reconstructed gene genealogies indeed were paraphyletic or poorly resolved (Fig. 2D, c.f. Fig S1C and D). In contrast, analysis of nearly all other distantly linked or unlinked genes, including mtDNA D-loop, dusp27 and maoa, identified M. m. domesticus as being monophyletic, i.e. the sequence from M. spretus was the sister lineage to a group containing all M. m. domesticus sequences, and thus, that all mice sampled are M. m. domesticus, whether or not they carry vkorc1spr (Fig. 2D, c.f. Fig S1C and D). Finally, when genome profiles I–X were analyzed for their divergence to polymorphism ratios by applying Hudson-Kreitman-Aguade (HKA) tests to sliding windows taken from mouse chromosome 7 and reference loci then the putatively introgressed region displayed significant deficiencies of divergence relative to polymorphism, which is consistent with divergent M. spretus variants now segregating as polymorphisms in M. m. domesticus (Fig. 2E and F) [17]. No such deficiencies were observed when only putatively pure M. m. domesticus genome profiles (I–III) were analyzed (not shown).
Figure 2.
Genome profiling of 10 M. m. domesticus from Germany and Spain. A. Coverage of genes, their transcript orientation and chromosomal physical positions (in megabases; Mb) (c.f. Table S2 for gene and PCR/sequencing primer information). B. VISTA plot depicting pairwise DNA sequence similarity scores (Y-axes, right, scaled between 90–100%) between C57BL/6J and 6 M. m. domesticus from Germany with genomic profiles I–VI and 4 from Spain (genome profiles VII–X). Exons are shown in purple, the coloring scheme is as in Figs. 1–2 indicating, at a coarse resolution; regions comprised out of predominantly M. m. domesticus sequences (pink) and M. spretus sequences (yellow). C. Minimum number of recombination events (black diamonds) within chromosome 7 among M. m. domesticus (excluding M. spretus and C57BL/6J). See also the analysis of linkage disequilibrium in Fig. S1B. D. Gene genealogies of M. m. domesticus identified as monophyletic or paraphyletic with respect to M. spretus, using 90% support for nodes as cutoff (c.f. Figure S1C and D). Significance of topologies is given in percent bootstrap values supporting monophyly of M. m. domesticus samples (top) or both clusters in paraphyletic topologies (bottom; first number M. m. domesticus, second number M. spretus). E. Plot of polymorphism in M. m. domesticus relative to divergence to M. spretus. F. Asterisks mark significance (at α=0.05, 0.01, and 0.001) of rejection of Hudson-Kreitman-Aquade (HKA) testing done on select non-recombining segments representing reference genes (grey shaded boxes; c.f. A for gene identifiers).
These observations show that vkorc1spr has entered M. m. domesticus as part of an introgression on chromosome 7 by hybridization with M. spretus. However, consistent with theories that put hybrid genotypes at a selective disadvantage [18, 19], previous studies have shown that hybrid genotypes are confined to the area of sympatry [15]. In contrast, our observed spread of vkorc1spr beyond the area of sympatry to the area of allopatry in Germany is the first of a number of compelling indicators for the adaptive value of at least one of the vkorc1spr alleles. Notably, the presence and spread of co-introgressed M. spretus variants linked to vkorc1 that currently are segregating as polymorphisms in M. m. domesticus shows that even though such variants may be detrimental [20], the benefits of carrying of vkorc1spr appear to outweigh any such adverse linkage effects.
An adaptive value of vkorc1spr is conceivable if it is assumed that at least one of its alleles is expressed as anticoagulant rodenticide resistance trait in M. m. domesticus. We hypothesize this mechanistic connection because of the well-known biochemical action and molecular targets of anticoagulants: the protein complex VKOR and the gene vkorc1 [1–4 and references given therein, and c.f. e.g. supplementary references 34–38]. Moreover, a pest control officer whom we work with provided us with anecdotal reports of his difficulties to control a population of M. m. domesticus in the township of Hamm, Germany, by means of bromadiolone. Our DNA sequence analysis of mice sampled from this population confirmed that they carry the homozygous complete vkorc1spr (genotype 20; Fig. 1A) while having genome profile VI (Fig. 2B), i.e. are M. m. domesticus. Mice from this location were brought to the laboratory for resistance testing (Table 1). We found that in this genetic background vkorc1spr lowers mortality to the anticoagulant rodenticides coumatetralyl or bromadiolone to 20% or 9%, respectively. In contrast, M. m. domesticus carrying wildtype vkorc1dom (genotype 1; Fig. 1A; genome profile I) displayed mortality rates of 84–100% to coumatetraly or 85% to bromadiolone. Moreover, 20% of M. m. domesticus carrying complete vkorc1spr survived difenacoum trials, whereas all wildtype vkorc1dom succumbed. These differences observed in the laboratory likely translate into considerable selection coefficients in the wild, and thus, support our assumed adaptive value of some vkorc1spr alleles, foremost complete homozygous vkorc1spr. Further testing of complete and partial vkorc1spr in various genetic backgrounds of mice will be useful for further elucidating these genotype-phenotype connections. However, it is reasonable to postulate that our data showing association of vkorc1spr with higher survival to anticoagulant exposure captures a significant part of this genetic response.
Table 1.
Mortality of M. m. domesticus tested during no choice feeding trails with broken wheat bait containing one of three rodenticides
| Strains/vkorc1 genotypes of M. m. domesticus1 | Sex | 375ppm coumatetralyl2 | 50ppm bromadiolone2 | 50ppm difenacoum2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mort.3 | Cons.3 | Mort.3 | Cons.3 | Mort.3 | Cons.3 | ||
| 1. Homozygous vkorc1 genotype 1 (vkorc1dom) | M | 9/9 | 14.2 | - | - | - | - |
| F | 10/10 | 18.0 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2. Homozygous vkorc1 genotype 1 (vkorc1dom) | M | 9/10 | 7.0 | 9/10 | 12.3 | 10/10 | 4.9* |
| F | 7/9 | 11.1 | 8/10 | 12.2 | 10/10 | 4.0* | |
| 3. Homozygous vkorc1 genotype 20 (vkorc1spr) | M | 4/10 | 11.4 | 2/11 | 16.4 | 9/10 | 10.9 |
| F | 0/10 | 7.5 | 0/11 | 10.1 | 7/10 | 11.2 | |
Strains maintained by S.E. in the laboratory of FRH: 1. Cd1/J; 2. wild-derived M. m. domesticus strain from the city of Leverkusen, Germany; 3. Wild-derived (M. m. domesticus from the township of Hamm, Germany
ppm–parts per million anticoagulant in bait
Mort.–Mortality as observed throughout a 14-day period following bait feeding; Cons. – Average consumption of bait (in grams) per mouse
Choice trial with broken wheat as alternative food, mortality during choice trials is lower than during no choice feeding trials, and are applied to identify mildly tolerant strains.
Earlier work has detected selective sweeps at the warfarin-resistance locus (Rw), which is now known to correspond to vkorc1 [1, 4], in wild rat populations [21]. Here, we detected such selective sweeps associated with vkorc1spr in populations of M. m. musculus from Spain, which is an additional observation of this study that is consistent with an adaptive value of the introgression. Specifically, we sequenced two Spanish populations (Spain 1 and 2; Fig. 1) of M. m. domesticus carrying complete or partial vkorc1spr for tead1 and dock1 flanking the introgression (c.f. Fig. 2A). Populations from Spain were analyzed because any selective sweeps should have occurred in the area of sympatry first. We detected genetic hitchhiking for tead1 in both populations (Fay and Wu’s normalized Hn =−3.02 and −1.82, p=0.014 and 0.047, respectively). Likely due to recombination, which was more frequent on the 3′ ends of vkorc1 and of the introgression compared to the 5′ ends (Fig. 2C and Fig. S1B), for dock1 a sweep was only supported for one population (Hn= −3.03, p=0.042). Thus, regardless of whether the populations presently carry complete (Spain-1) or partial vkorc1spr (Spain-2), the introgression of at least one vkorc1spr allele appears to have been of at least temporally adaptive value in the recent past.
We modeled selective sweeps at vkorc1 to investigate whether their timing could be considered consistent with the timing of the introduction of rodenticides in the 1950s. We conducted a composite-likelihood analysis of simulated incomplete sweeps using algorithms implemented in ssw and clics [22, 23]. We analyzed 30 inferred vkorc1 haplotypes of mice from population Spain-1. As the adaptive amino acid changes in vkorc1spr we considered R12W, A26S and A48T (c.f. Fig. 1B). Simulations provided maximum likelihood estimates of α = 2Ns = 5.6–6.6×103, where N is the effective population size and the selection coefficient s = 0.28–0.33.
We used the expression ~2ln(2N)/s to calculate that the sweep took place ~61–71 generations ago, which, assuming a generation time of 0.2–0.3 years for mice, corresponds to ~13–22 years. We obtained a more recent timing of the selective sweep (25–36 generations or 5–11 years ago) when α was obtained by bootstrapping (α = 1.13–1.61×104; s = 0.56–0.81). These estimates are consistent with a recent selective sweep when rodenticides were already in use. Notably, it would require broader geographic sampling of M. m domesticus and M. spretus to clarify whether the introgression has multiple origins, which is a possible explanation for polymorphisms seen within the introgression, and to better describe the timing, geographic spread and population genetics of complete, partial and recombinant vkorc1spr. Our study explains the presence of trans-species polymorphisms in M. spretus and M. m. domesticus by adaptive introgressive hybridization. Other studies have detected possible hybrids in the area of sympatry between M. spretus and M. m. domesticus [15] or showed rare much more ancient trans-species polymorphisms; some of these seemingly being maintained by balancing selection [24, 25].
The vkorc1 gene is evolutionarily conserved from invertebrates to mammals [1]. It was therefore unexpected to find evidence for positive selection on vkorc1 in M. spretus, and notably, that this adaptive evolution involved radical amino-acid substitutions at conserved positions in the VKORC1 protein: one position conserved between human/rodents and Anopheles (R61L), two positions in the transmembrane domain conserved between human/rodents and chicken (R12W and A26S), and one position conserved between human and rodents (A48T) (c.f. Fig. 1 and Ref. [1]). Our analysis of interspecific protein sequence evolution, Ka/Ks, between M. spretus and M. m. domesticus identified vkorc1 as one of the fastest evolving M. spretus transcripts sequenced so far (Ka/Ks=1.54–1.93; Fig. 3A). This high evolutionary rate Ka/Ks>1 was predominantly seen between M. musculus spp. and M. spretus, i.e. after the split between mice from rats (Fig. 3B). The mapping of nucleotide substitutions on the phylogeny of mice and R. norvegicus constructed based on the full vkorc1 protein coding sequence pinpointed this evolutionary rate acceleration to the M. spretus lineage exclusively, where we observed an excess of 4 non-synonymous substitutions (Tajima’s relative rate test[26], p=0.045; Fig. 3C), but not of silent substitutions (p=0.317).
Figure 3.
Adaptive evolution of vkorc1 in the M. spretus lineage. A. Plot of Ka/Ks between M. m. domesticus and M. spretus 184 gene transcripts. To reflect our confidence in orthology transcripts are grouped in order of decreasing confidence in orthology as one2one - one Inparanoid hit in each species; n2one - one hit in one species but many hits in the other; n2m - multiple hits in both species. The positions of vkorc1 (minimum and maximum Ka/Ks) in this distribution are shown as *. B. Plot of Ks versus Ka of vkorc1 between R. norvegicus and M. spretus and M. musculus spp. (M. m. domesticus, M. m. musculus, M. m. castaneus, M. m. molossinus) (black triangles), between members of M. musculus spp. (pink diamonds), and between M. musculus spp. and M. spretus (yellow squares). The dashed line depicts Ka=Ks expected under selective neutrality. C. Mapping of non-synonymous substitutions on the vkorc1 neighbor-joining phylogeny of M. musculus spp., M. spretus, and R. norvegicus. Numbers above branches indicate the average number of nucleotide substitutions. A significant excess of non-synonymous substitutions (n=4), as determined using Tajima’s relative rate test, is indicated by*
The adaptive molecular evolution of vkorc1 in M. spretus has led to the fixation of amino acids that confer anticoagulant resistance in the genomic background of house mice. Interestingly, M. spretus is also highly tolerant to rodenticides; in the sole study published, 4/7 (57%) mice tested succumbed to bromadiolone, and 0/9, 0/10, and 0/7 succumbed to difenacoum, chlorphacinon, and coumatetralyl, respectively [27]. One hypothesis to explain the adaptive evolution of vkorc1 in M. spretus implicates adaptation to a granivorous vitamin K-deficient diet [28]. The tolerance of M. spretus to rodenticides could thus be a pleiotropic effect of a physiological adaptation unrelated to rodenticide selection. Other granivorous rodents, including Shaw’s gerbil (Meriones shawi), the Egyptian spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus), and the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus), display similar high levels of tolerance to rodenticides despite being naive to the poisons [28]. However, which of the amino acid changes in vkorc1spr mediate resistance is not known, and in vitro, individually these amino-acid changes appear to have no protective effect on vkorc1 in the presence of warfarin [1]. Thus, epiststatic interactions between sites within vkorc1, or between sites elsewhere in the genome, would need to be invoked to explain resistance observed in vivo in M. m. domesticus and M. spretus. Nevertheless, vkorc1 clearly has undergone adaptive molecular evolution in M. spretus since it separated from other Mus lineages, and the introgression of complete vkorc1spr appears to have transferred this tolerance to house mice, although differences in the resistance phenotype due to the genomic background are to be expected.
Conclusion
Our study illustrates that an adaptive trait can convergently evolve by selection on new or standing genetic polymorphisms as well as by adaptive introgressive hybridization between species, with these processes eventually becoming connected through the establishment of recombinant genotypes. Interestingly, human-mediated dispersal likely was a factor in this horizontal transfer of rodenticide resistance between M. m. domesticus and M. spretus, because until the spread of human agriculture enabled the dispersal of house mice the species were allopatric [29]. Moreover, a selection regime altered by humans by introducing rodenticide appears to have driven the adaptive introgressive hybridization between the two species by locally and temporarily elevating the fitness of hybrids over that of the rodenticide susceptible parental species, at least over that of M. m. domesticus carrying wildtype vkorc1dom.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
European house mice (M. musculus domesticus) are polymorphic for an introgression from the Algerian mouse (Mus spretus) that includes the molecular target of anticoagulant rodenticides (vkorc1).
The vkorc1 allele of M. spretus can cause anticoagulant resistance when introgressed into M. m. domesticus.
M. musculus domesticus has evolved anticoagulant rodenticide resistance by selection on alleles that evolved from new or standing polymorphisms in vkorc1 and by selection on a divergent pleiotropic vkorc1 allele acquired by inter-specific mating with M. spretus.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Rost S, Fregin A, Ivaskevicius V, Conzelmann E, Hortnagel K, Pelz HJ, Lappegard K, Seifried E, Scharrer I, Tuddenham EGD, Muller CR, Strom TM, Oldenburg J. Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2. Nature. 2004;427:537–541. doi: 10.1038/nature02214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rost S, Pelz HJ, Menzel S, MacNicoll AD, Leon V, Song KJ, Jakel T, Oldenburg J, Muller CR. Novel mutations in the VKORC1 gene of wild rats and mice - a response to 50 years of selection pressure by warfarin? Bmc Genetics. 2009:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pelz HJ, Rost S, Hunerberg M, Fregin A, Heiberg AC, Baert K, MacNicoll AD, Prescott CV, Walker AS, Oldenburg J, Muller CR. The genetic basis of resistance to anticoagulants in rodents. Genetics. 2005;170:1839–1847. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.040360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li T, Chang CY, Jin DY, Lin PJ, Khvorova A, Stafford DW. Identification of the gene for vitamin K epoxide reductase. Nature. 2004;427:541–544. doi: 10.1038/nature02254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scully MF. Warfarin therapy: rat poison and the prevention of thrombosis. The Biochemist. 2002;24:15–17. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sadler JE. K is for koagulation. Nature. 2004;427:493–494. doi: 10.1038/427493a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gage BF. Pharmacogenetics-based coumarin therapy. Hematology. 2006:183–187. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2006.1.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jackson WB, Ashton D. Pesticide resistance: strategies and tactics for management. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 1986. Case Histories of Anticoagulant Resistance; pp. 355–369. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ishizuka M, Tanikawa T, Tanaka KD, Heewon M, Okajima F, Sakamoto KQ, Fujita S. Pesticide resistance in wild mammals - Mechanisms of anticoagulant resistance in wild rodents. Journal of Toxicological Sciences. 2008;33:283–291. doi: 10.2131/jts.33.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang HS, Feng ZY, Yao DD, Sui JJ, Zhong WQ, Li M, Dai JY. Warfarin resistance in Rattus losea in Guangdong Province, China. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2008;91:90–95. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arnold ML. Transfer and Origin of Adaptations through Natural Hybridization: Were Anderson and Stebbins Right? The Plant Cell. 2004:562–570. doi: 10.1105/tpc.HistPersp. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Palomo LJ, Justo ER, Vargas JM. Mus spretus (Rodentia: Muridae) Mammalian Species. 2009;42:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pelz HJ, Niethammer J. Sonderdruck aus Z f Saugetierkunde. Vol. 43. Hamburg und Berlin; Paul Parey: 1978. Kreuzungsversuche zwischen Labor-Hausmausen und Mus spretus aus Portugal; pp. 302–304. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dejager L, Libert C, Montagutelli X. Thirty years of Mus spretus: a promising future. Trends Genet. 2009;25:234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Orth A, Belkhir K, Britton-Davidian J, Boursot P, Benazzou T, Bonhomme F. Hybridisation between two sympatric species of mice Mus musculus domesticus L. and Mus spretus Lataste. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2002;325:89–97. doi: 10.1016/s1631-0691(02)01413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Song Y, Vera N, Kohn MH. Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (Vkorc1) haplotype diversity in mouse priority strains. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1:125. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kliman RM, Andolfatto P, Coyne JA, Depaulis F, Kreitman M, Berry AJ, McCarter J, Wakeley J, Hey J. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics. 2000;156:1913–1931. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barton NH. The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular Ecology. 2001;10:551–568. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Teeter KC, Payseur BA, Harris LW, Bakewell MA, Thibodeau LM, O’Brien JE, Krenz JG, Sans-Fuentes MA, Nachman MW, Tucker PK. Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone. Genome Res. 2008;18:67–76. doi: 10.1101/gr.6757907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Whitney KD, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH. Adaptive Introgression of Herbivore Resistance Traits in the Weedy Sunflower Helianthus annuus. Am Nat. 2006;167:794–807. doi: 10.1086/504606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kohn MH, Pelz HJ, Wayne RK. Natural selection mapping of the warfarin-resistance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7911–7915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim Y, Stephan W. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics. 2002;160:765–777. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meiklejohn CD, Kim Y, Hartl DL, Parsch J. Identification of a locus under complex positive selection in Drosophila simulans by haplotype mapping and composite-likelihood estimation. Genetics. 2004;168:265–279. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.025494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Greene-Till R, Zhao Y, Hardies SC. Gene flow of unique sequences between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus spretus. Mamm Genome. 2000;11:225–230. doi: 10.1007/s003350010041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Johnsen JM, Teschke M, Pavlidis P, McGee BM, Tautz D, Ginsburg D, Baines JF. Selection on cis-regulatory variation at B4galnt2 and its influence on von Willebrand Factor in house mice. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:567–578. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutationhypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baeumler W, Asran AA. Susceptibility of house mice (Mus musculus) of different origins to anticoagulants. Pests of Plants. 1987;60:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 28.MacNicoll AE. Anticoagulant Rodenticides - Tolerance and Resistance. Phytoparasitica. 1993;21:185–189. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boursot P, Auffray JC, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F. The Evolution of House Mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1993;24:119–152. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



