Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Lab Invest. 2010 Jun 14;90(12):1704–1717. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.112

Attenuated progression of diet-induced steatohepatitis in glutathione-deficient mice

Jamil A Haque 1, Ryan S McMahan 1, Jean S Campbell 1, Masami Shimizu-Albergine 2, Angela M Wilson 1, Dianne Botta 3, Theo K Bammler 3, Richard P Beyer 3, Thomas J Montine 1, Matthew M Yeh 1, Terrance J Kavanagh 3, Nelson Fausto 1
PMCID: PMC3156113  NIHMSID: NIHMS300450  PMID: 20548286

Abstract

In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), depletion of hepatic antioxidants may contribute to the progression of steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) by increasing oxidative stress that produces lipid peroxidation, inflammation, and fibrosis. We investigated whether depletion of glutathione (GSH) increases NASH-associated hepatic pathology in mice fed a diet deficient in methionine and choline (MCD diet). Wild-type (wt) mice and genetically GSH-deficient mice lacking the modifier subunit of glutamate cysteine ligase (Gclm null mice), the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo synthesis of GSH, were fed the MCD diet, a methionine/choline-sufficient diet, or standard chow for 21 days. We assessed NASH-associated hepatic pathology, including steatosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning, and used the NAFLD Scoring System to evaluate the extent of changes. We measured triglyceride levels, determined the level of lipid peroxidation products, and measured by qPCR the expression of mRNAs for several proteins associated with lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, and fibrosis. MCD-fed GSH-deficient Gclm null mice were to a large extent protected from MCD diet-induced excessive fat accumulation, hepatocyte injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Compared with wt animals, MCD-fed Gclm null mice had much lower levels of F2-isoprostanes, lower expression of acyl-CoA oxidase, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a, uncoupling protein-2, stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase-1, transforming growth factor-β, and plas-minogen activator inhibitor-1 mRNAs, and higher activity of catalase, indicative of low oxidative stress, inhibition of triglyceride synthesis, and lower expression of profibrotic proteins. Global gene analysis of hepatic RNA showed that compared with wt mice, the livers of Gclm null mice have a high capacity to metabolize endogenous and exogenous compounds, have lower levels of lipogenic proteins, and increased antioxidant activity. Thus, metabolic adaptations resulting from severe GSH deficiency seem to protect against the development of steatohepatitis.

Keywords: NASH, NAFLD, MCD diet, glutathione, steatohepatitis, lipid peroxidation, F2-isoprostanes


Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the accumulation of hepatic fat in the absence of alcohol abuse, is an important health problem associated with diabetes and obesity. At present, 15–20% of adults in the United States have NAFLD with similar prevalence in Europe and Asia.1,2 NAFLD includes steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a condition marked by inflammation and hepatic fibrosis that can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure.3 Treatments for NASH and cirrhosis are limited, in part, because of incomplete knowledge about the mechanisms that determine the progression of disease from steatosis to NASH, and eventually to cirrhosis.4,5

Genetic models of rodent obesity or the feeding of high-fat diets induce hepatic steatosis without progression to steatohepatitis. In contrast, feeding a high-sucrose diet deficient in methionine and choline (MCD diet) causes hepatic steatosis, hepatocyte injury, inflammation, and ultimately fibrosis,6 a spectrum of changes that mimic the hepatic pathology of NASH. The induction of steatosis by the MCD diet is caused primarily by defects in the export of hepatic triglycerides and increased fatty acid uptake.7 The diet also causes other alterations in lipid metabolism, such as the suggested increase in fatty acid flux through the β-oxidation pathway, without an associated change in the activity of oxidative enzymes.8,9 Despite the similarity between the liver injury caused by the MCD diet and that present in patients with NASH, MCD feeding does not reproduce the NASH syndrome, as it is not associated with insulin resistance and weight gain.10,11 Nevertheless, MCD feeding is a very good model for the study of the mechanisms of progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis.7

Development of NASH in humans and in animal models of steatohepatitis is considered to be the consequence of sequential events or ‘hits,’12 the first being hepatic fat accumulation. Oxidative stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), acting upon the accumulated hepatic lipids to cause lipid peroxidation, is considered as one of the subsequent hits in the progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis. The development of steatohepatitis is associated with increased lipid peroxidation, as indicated by the increased levels of lipid peroxidation products such as iPF13 in the plasma and urine of patients with NASH and the liver of rodents with steatohepatitis. The presence of oxidized lipids and proteins in the livers of patients with NASH and animals fed the MCD diet is another indication of an increased oxidative state under these conditions.14,15 On the basis of these and other observations, it has been proposed that ROS-mediated lipid peroxidation could be an initiating event in NASH pathogenesis that might precede steatosis.4

Lipid peroxidation products cause cell injury and inflammation, and can induce collagen production in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) through transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling, leading to fibrosis.14 Increased oxidative stress during the development of steatohepatitis also causes the release of TNF and other cytokines, which further increases oxidative stress through effects on the mitochondria and inhibition of adiponectin.16,17 However, it is not clear whether the levels of oxidative stress directly correlate with the severity of steatohepatitis.18 For instance, Syn et al19 did not find a correlation between oxidative stress and the development of bridging fibrosis in mice of two different strains fed a high-fat diet.

The activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and catalase, as well as glutathione (GSH) levels decrease in patients with NASH and in animal models of diet-induced steatohepatitis. Mice deficient in the anti-oxidant enzyme methionine adenosyl transferase (MAT1A null mice) develop steatohepatitis spontaneously. Restoration of hepatic GSH by treatment with S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) prevents injury in MAT1A null mice11 and improves diet-induced steatohepatitis in rats, further implicating oxidative stress as a key factor in the development of this condition, and suggesting an important role for GSH.20 However, in another study, the repletion of hepatic GSH did not protect mice fed the MCD diet from long-term hepatic injury and fibrosis, although protection was achieved by vitamin E treatment.21

Given the role that oxidative injury may have in the progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis, it is logical to inquire whether GSH depletion would influence the development of steatohepatitis. However, the direct effect of GSH deficiency on this process has not been examined. GSH is present in hepatocytes at concentrations of 5–10 mM, levels which are much higher than those found in other cells.22 The rate-limiting step in GSH biosynthesis is catalyzed by glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL). This enzyme is composed of a catalytic subunit, and a lower-molecular-weight modifier subunit (GCLM), which regulates GCL activity by decreasing the Km value for glutamate and by increasing the Ki value for GSH.22,23 We along with others have shown that in mice genetically deficient for Gclm (Gclm null mice), hepatic GSH is 15% of the level in wild-type (wt) littermates.24,25

To examine whether GSH deficiency would affect the development of steatohepatitis, we compared the effect of the MCD diet on the development of steatohepatitis in Gclm null and wt mice. Additional controls consisted of feeding both Gclm null mice and wt mice standard chow, or the methionine/choline-sufficient diet (MCS) diet, which is identical to MCD but contains choline and methionine. In this study, we show, unexpectedly, that oxidative stress, steatosis, and the progression to steatohepatitis were greatly attenuated in Gclm null mice fed the MCD diet, as a consequence of metabolic adaptations to the GSH deficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Specific pathogen-free male C57/B16 Gclm null mice or wt littermates were used for all experiments. The Gclm null mice (previously described), although subfertile, are otherwise phenotypically similar to wt littermates.24,26 For all experiments, n = 4–6 animals per group. All experiments were approved and performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Washington (Seattle, WA, USA), which is certified by the American Association of Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.

Diet

Mice of the C57/B16 strain used in all experiments were weaned at 3 weeks of age and placed on standard chow (Picolab 20). At 8 weeks of age, mice were placed on the experimental (MCD) or control (MCS) diet. Experimental animals received MCD diet (MP Biomedicals, cat. no. 960439). The MCD diet contained 17% protein (as defined amino acids), 65% carbohydrate (as 70:30 sucrose:starch), and 10% fat (as corn oil). The MCS diet was identical, except that it had been supplemented with DL-methionine (3 g/kg) and choline chloride (2 g/kg) (MP Biomedicals, cat. no. 960441). All animals had ad libitum access to food and water. Mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation. The liver tissue was snap frozen for protein, mRNA, and lipid content analysis, or fixed in 10% formalin/PBS and embedded in paraffin for H&E and picosirius red staining.

Assessment of Steatohepatitis

Formalin-fixed liver sections were examined by a pathologist (MMY) blinded to genotype or treatment and scored using the NAFLD activity score system (NAS) as described previously.27

Analysis of Liver Fibrosis

To measure collagen deposition, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were stained with picosirius red, and 20 hpf ( × 40 magnification) per animal were photographed using an Olympus DP11 microscope (Olympus, Melville, NY, USA) with a polarizing filter to highlight Sirius red staining. Digital images were analyzed using the ImagePro Plus software package (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA) and the Sirius red staining was expressed as a percentage of the positively stained area compared with the total hepatic area examined. Alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) was detected in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections using standard immunohistochemical techniques. In brief, microwave antigen retrieval was performed in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer, and αSMA was detected with rabbit anti-αSMA antibody (cat. no. 1184-1; Epitomics) diluted 1:500 in 5% normal goat serum. Primary antibodies were detected using the rabbit Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by counterstaining with Gill 3 × hematoxylin.

Reverse Transcriptase Real-Time PCR Analysis (qPCR)

Total hepatic RNA was extracted in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and cDNA was reverse transcribed using the Retroscript kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription real-time PCR was performed using commercially available FAM-labeled primers (ABI Systems) in an RG 3000 thermocycler (Corbett Robotics, San Francisco, CA, USA), except for TGF-β, which was measured using SYBR Green PCR mix (ABI Systems) and the primers: forward: 5′-GCCCGAAGCGGACTACTA TG-3′; reverse: 5′-AGATGGCGTTGTTGCGGT-3′. Relative gene expression data shown in the figures were calculated using 18S rRNA as an internal control. Values were normalized to those of male, age-matched, chow-fed wt mice using the ΔΔCt method.

Global Gene Expression Analysis

RNA was isolated from the livers of five male Gclm null and five wt mice using TRIzol. The Affymetrix microarrays were processed the same as reported previously.28 Raw microarray data were processed and analyzed with Bioconductor29 and normalized with the Bioconductor GC-RMA package.30 From the normalized data, genes with significant evidence for differential expression were identified using the limma package31 in Bioconductor. P-values were calculated with a modified t-test in conjunction with empirical Bayes method to moderate the s.e. of the estimated log-fold changes. P-values were adjusted for multiplicity with the Bioconductor package Q-value,32 which allows for selecting statistically significant genes while controlling the estimated false discovery rate.33

Differentially expressed genes more than twofold upregulated or more than twofold downregulated in Gclm null mice compared with wt mice were selected for input to NIH DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery). KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) annotation was used to identify enriched annotation terms within the input list. The KEGG pathways identified were ranked by P-value, which is determined by the EASE score (Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer, a modified Fisher’s exact test). Counts and percentages refer to the number of genes from the input list that fall into a given KEGG pathway. Fold enrichment is the magnitude of enrichment for a particular KEGG pathway in the input gene list compared with the entire mouse genome, which serves as the reference background. Correlations between changes in gene expression obtained by mircorarray and real-time RT-PCR analyses were performed by comparing fold changes from microarray data with ΔΔCt determination by RT-PCR.

Measurement of Hepatic Triglycerides

The snap-frozen liver was homogenized in 0.5 M Tris (pH 7.4) and 1% Triton X-100 buffer. Homogenates were extracted twice at RT using 2:1 chloroform:methanol solution, dried and resuspended in chloroform. Aliquots were dried, resuspended in Lubrol (20% vol/wt) in chloroform, dried, resuspended in water, and then incubated at 37°C for 10 min. Triglyceride reagent (Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI, USA) was added to samples and the Triolein standards (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Samples were incubated 5 min at 37°C, transferred to a microtiter plate, and absorbance at 490 nm was measured.

Measurement of Hepatic Catalase Activity

Catalase activity was determined in liver lysates using the Amplex Red Catalase assay (Molecular Probes) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Measurement of Hepatic F2-Isoprostanes

F2-isoprostanes from the snap-frozen liver were quantified in modified Folch extracts using gas chromatography with negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry and selective ion monitoring as described previously.6

Measurement of Hepatic Total GSH

GSH was measured using the 2,3-naphthalenedicarbox-aldehyde assay as described previously.24 Clarified tissue homogenates prepared in TES/SB buffer (20 mM Tris, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 250 mM sucrose, 20 mM sodium borate, 2 mM serine) were diluted 1:1 with 10% 5-sulfosalicylic acid, incubated on ice for 10 min, and protein precipitated by centrifugation. In all, 25 μl aliquots of the supernatants were used for subsequent analysis.

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-tests. Data were analyzed using Prism statistical analysis software from GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA, USA). For all experiments, n = 4–6 animals per group. Differences between groups were considered to be statistically significant at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Hepatic GSH Levels

To verify the levels of hepatic GSH, and to determine the effect of feeding the MCD diet on GSH, we measured hepatic GSH in Gclm null and wt mice fed standard chow or the MCD diet (Figure 1). GSH levels in chow-fed animals were ~66 nmol GSH per milligram protein in wt mice and 12 nmol GSH per milligram protein in Gclm null mice (Figure 1). MCD feeding decreased hepatic GSH levels in wt mice by ~55%, whereas in Gclm null mice, there was only a minimal decrease in GSH. These results confirm that hepatic GSH levels in Gclm null mice are only 10–20% of normal, and show that after 3 weeks of MCD feeding, the hepatic GSH level in Gclm null mice is ~3.5-fold lower than that of wt animals.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Total hepatic GSH concentrations measured in wild-type (wt) or Gclm null (ko) mice on standard mouse chow or after 21 days on the MCD diet. *P <0.01 vs wt MCD; # <0.01 vs wt chow. For all groups, n = 4–6 animals.

Hepatic Pathology of Mice Fed the MCD Diet

Patients with NASH and MCD-fed animals have a spectrum of hepatic abnormalities that include steatosis, ballooning hepatocytes, inflammation, and fibrosis.34 The livers of wt mice fed the MCD diet showed macrovesicular steatosis, ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes, and lobular inflammation. However, these changes including fat accumulation were greatly attenuated in MCD-fed null mice (Figure 2). We used the NAS scoring system to better assess the extent of changes induced by feeding the MCD diet (Table 1).27 NAS is a semi-quantitative system developed by the Pathology Committee of the NASH Clinical Research Network that consists of the sum of scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning. In human biopsies, an overall NAS score of ≥ 5 correlates with NASH, whereas a score < 3 is diagnosed as ‘non-NASH.’ Compared with MCD-fed Gclm null mice, wt mice fed the same diet showed a significantly greater level of inflammation (2.5 ± 0.22 vs 1.3 ± 0.25), hepatocyte ballooning (1.3 ± 0.33 vs 0.3 ± 0.25), and steatosis (2.5 ± 0.22 vs 1.8 ± 0.47), and had a higher overall NAS score (6.2 ± 0.48 vs 2.3 ± 0.95). These data show, as expected, that feeding the MCD diet causes severe steatohepatitis in wt mice. Surprisingly however, Gclm null mice showed only mild alterations and had a ‘non-NASH’ NAS score.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hematoxylin and eosin-stained formalin-fixed sections showing representative hepatic pathology in wild-type (wt) and Gclm null mice after 21 days on the MCD diet. Arrows point to macrovesicular steatosis. Arrowheads highlight areas of infiltrating neutrophils.

Table 1.

NAFLD activity scores of Gclm null and WT mice fed the MCS or MCD diets

Wt MCS Gclm null MCS Wt MCD Gclm null MCD
Steatosis 1.2±0.4* 0.3±0.3* 2.5±0.2 1.8±0.5*
Inflammation 0.6±0.2* 1.3±0.6 2.5±0.2 1.3±0.3*
Ballooning 0.4±0.2 0.5±0.5 1.3±0.3 0.3±0.3*
NAFLD activity score (NAS) 2.2±0.6* 2.0±1.4* 6.2±0.5 2.3±1.0*

Formalin-fixed liver sections were analyzed from wt and Gclm null mice fed the MCS or MCD diet. Hepatic NASH-associated pathology was scored using an NAFLD Activity Scoring System (NAS) as described in Materials and Methods.

*

P <0.05 vs wt MCD. For all groups, n = 4–6 animals.

Hepatic Steatosis

As described above, histological analysis showed that MCD-fed Gclm null mice accumulated less fat in their livers than did wt mice, an observation confirmed by staining the sections with oil red (Figure 3a and b). To quantitate the development of hepatic steatosis induced by the MCD diet, we measured the triglyceride content in the livers of MCD-fed Gclm null and wt mice, and in animals fed the MCS and chow diets. Hepatic triglycerides in chow-fed wt mice (24.9 ± 2.2 μg/mg) were significantly higher than in chow-fed Gclm null mice (10.9 ± 2.2 μg/mg; P <0.05) (Figure 3c). The MCD diet induced a significant increase in hepatic triglycerides in both wt mice (to 81.1 ± 14.5 μg of triglycerides per milligram of liver) and Gclm null mice (to 31.9 ± 5.8 μg/mg) (P <0.05), but the triglyceride levels were ~2.5-fold higher in wt mice. The MCS diet caused a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased hepatic triglycerides in wt (46.1 ± 8.3 μg/mg) and Gclm null mice (24.8 ± 5.9 μg/mg). These data show that Gclm null mice fed chow, MCS, or MCD diets accumulate less hepatic triglycerides than wt mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hepatic steatosis in wild-type (wt) and Gclm null (ko) mice. Oil red-stained section of MCD-fed wild-type liver (a) shows increased oil red staining (arrows) typical of hepatic lipid accumulation. Decreased oil red staining in MCD-fed Gclm null liver (b) indicates decreased hepatic steatosis. Hepatic triglycerides (c) in wt and Gclm null mice on standard mouse chow (panel c), methionine-choline-sufficient diet (MCS), or methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet. *P <0.05, compared with wt MCD; #P <0.05, compared with null C.

To investigate the mechanisms of triglyceride accumulation in the liver in mice fed the MCD diet, we analyzed the mRNA expression of a group of genes involved in triglyceride synthesis and transport, and in fatty acid synthesis. Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase-1 (SCD-1) catalyzes the conversion of the long-chain fatty acids palmitate and stearate into the monosaturated fatty acids palmitoleate and oleate, a key step in the incorporation of fatty acids into triglycerides. Rizki et al9 reported that the MCD diet suppresses the expression of SCD-1 mRNA in the mouse liver. In our experiments, feeding the MCD diet caused an ~29-fold decrease in the expression of hepatic SCD-1 mRNA, compared with that of wt animals fed the MCS control diet (Figure 4a). The expression of SCD-1 mRNA was much lower in MCD-fed Gclm null mice, which showed an ~89-fold decrease compared with Gclm null mice fed the MCS control diet. Both wt and Gclm null mice fed the MCD diet showed similar decreased expression of mRNAs for fatty acid synthase (FAS), which is involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis (Figure 4b), and for microsomal triglyceride transport protein, an enzyme which catalyzes triglyceride incorporation into VLDL (not shown). These results suggest that the MCD diet causes a decrease in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis, and inhibits triglyceride export in both wt and Gclm null mice but that the inhibition of triglyceride synthesis is particularly striking in Gclm null animals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Expression of hepatic stearoyl-Co enzyme A desaturase-1 (SCD-1) (a), and fatty acid synthase (FAS) (b) mRNA by qPCR in wt and Gclm null (ko) mice fed methionine-choline-sufficient (MCS) or methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet. *P <0.05 compared with wt MCS; #P <0.05 compared with ko MCS; $P <0.05 compared with wt MCD, for all groups, n = 4–6 animals. Relative expression was determined by the ΔΔCt method as described in the Materials and Methods section, in which hepatic expression in wt, chow-fed, age-matched, male mice is 1.0.

Development of Fibrosis

In addition to hepatic steatosis, the MCD diet induces hepatic inflammation and ultimately fibrosis.6 To measure hepatic fibrosis, we examined collagen deposition using Sirius red staining (Figure 5). MCD-fed wt mice had higher hepatic Sirius red staining compared with animals on the MCS diet (0.432 vs 0.124%). In contrast, in Gclm null mice, there was no significant difference in Sirius red staining between animals fed the MCD or the MCS diet (0.121 vs 0.072%). Sirius red staining in the liver of MCD-fed wt animals was significantly higher than that of MCD-fed Gclm null mice (Figure 5; 0.432 vs 0.121%), showing that MCD feeding caused only minimal fibrosis in Gclm null mice. Feeding the MCD diet caused an increase in αSMA staining, a good marker for activated stellate cells associated with fibrosis, in both wt and gclm null mice. However, the increase was much higher in wt mice than in gclm null animals (Figure 6). Consistent with these data, MCD feeding led to higher levels of gene expression for the profibrotic factors TIMP-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and TGF-β, and of Col1A1 in wt mice compared with Gclm null mice (Figure 7).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Gclm null mice are resistant to MCD diet-induced fibrosis. Sirius red-stained section of MCD-fed liver of wt mouse (a) shows pericellular Sirius red staining (arrow), indicating collagen deposition; little staining is detected in MCD-fed Gclm (ko) null liver (b). Morphometric analysis of hepatic Sirius red staining (c). Staining was significantly increased in MCD-fed wt liver (wt MCD) compared with MCS-fed wt mice (wt MCS), and MCS or MCD-fed Gclm null mice (ko MCS; ko MCD). *P <0.05 compared with wt MCD, for all groups, n = 4–6 animals.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Low expression of αSMA in Gclm null mice fed the MCD diet. αSMA-stained sections of the livers of MCS-fed wt (a) and Gclm null (b) and of MCD-fed wt (c, d) and Gclm null (e, f) mice. The pericellular αSMA staining in MCD-fed wt (panels c, d) compared with that of MCD-fed Gclm null mice (panels e, f) or MCS-fed animals (panels a, b) must be noted. Magnifications, for panels a, b, c, e, × 10; for panels d, f, × 40).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Expression of hepatic fibrogenic genes in wt and Gclm (ko) null mice. TIMP-1 (a), PAI-1 (b), TGF-β (c), and Col1A1 (d) mRNAs from the livers of wt or Gclm null (ko) mice fed the MCS or MCD diet for 21 days. Relative expression was determined by the ΔΔCt method in which hepatic expression in wt, chow-fed, age-matched, male mice is 1.0. For panel a, ##P <0.01 compared with wt MCS; ΦP <0.05 compared with ko MCS. For panel b, *P <0.05 compared with wt MCD. For panel d, #P <0.05 compared with wt MCS.

Lipid Peroxidation and Catalase Activity

Oxidative stress-induced lipid peroxidation is considered to be an important event in the progress of steatosis to steatohepatitis. Lipid peroxidation products such as F2-iso-prostanes (produced by free radical-catalyzed peroxidation of arachidonic acid) are believed to contribute to inflammation and to the development of fibrosis, most likely by stimulating TGF-β signaling and collagen synthesis in HSCs.14 Measurements of iPF levels in MCD-fed mice showed that they were approximately eight times higher in wt mice than in Gclm null animals (Figure 8a). In Gclm null mice, there was no significant difference in iPF levels between animals fed the MCD or the MCS diet; in contrast, wt mice fed the MCD diet had much higher iPF levels than did wt mice fed the MCS diet. These data show that, in contrast to wt animals, the MCD diet induces little lipid peroxidation in Gclm null mice.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(a) Concentration of hepatic F2-isoprostanes in wt and Gclm null mice fed the MCS or MCD diet. *P <0.05 compared with wt MCD. (b) Catalase activity in MCD-fed Gclm null mice. *P <0.05 compared with wt MCD; #P <0.05 compared with wt chow; ΦP <0.05 compared with Gclm null chow.

To determine whether antioxidant enzymes may be more active in the liver of Gclm null mice than in that of wt mice, we measured the activity of catalase, an enzyme that mediates the decomposition of H2O2 to oxygen and water, thereby preventing formation of reactive hydroxyl radicals. The expression and activity of catalase is decreased in humans with NASH and in animal models of steatohepatitis. We found that catalase activity decreased in both MCD-fed wt and Gclm null mice compared with chow-fed controls (Figure 8b), but that the decrease was smaller in Gclm null mice. As a consequence, catalase activity was significantly higher in MCD-fed Gclm null mice compared with MCD-fed wt mice, an indication that Gclm null mice have a greater capacity for disposal of potentially harmful hydroxyl radicals than wt mice.

Fatty Acid β-Oxidation

To examine fatty acid β-oxidation in mice fed the MCD diet, we determined the level of mRNA for acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a (CPT-1a), as well as peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α mRNA (Figure 9). Lipid metabolism through β-oxidation in the liver can occur in the peroxisomes and mitochondria. ACO is the rate-limiting enzyme in peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation.35 The expression of ACO mRNA was decreased in both MCD-fed Gclm null and wt mice in comparison with that in animals fed the MCS diet, but the decrease in ACO mRNA in MCD-fed Gclm null mice was approximately fivefold greater (Figure 9a). CPT-1a is a rate-limiting regulator of mitochondrial β-oxidation through its role in mitochondrial fatty acid import. The expression of CPT-1a mRNA increased in wt mice fed the MCD diet compared with mice fed the MCS diet, but it decreased in MCD-fed Gclm null mice, and was approximately threefold lower than in MCD-fed wt mice (Figure 9b). The lower expression of ACO and CPT-1a in MCD-fed Gclm null mice suggests that the MCD diet causes less mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in these animals compared with wt mice.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Hepatic expression of Acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO) (a) carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1-a (CPT-1) (b), uncoupling protein-2 (UCP-2) (c), or PPARα (d), mRNA in wt or Gclm null (ko) mice after 21 days on either a methionine-choline-sufficient (MCS), or methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet. ΦP <0.05 compared with wt MCD; *P <0.05 compared with wt MCS; #P <0.05 compared with ko MCS. Relative expression was determined by the ΔΔCt method as described in the Materials and Methods section, in which hepatic expression in wt, chow-fed, age-matched, male mice is 1.0.

Uncoupling Protein 2

Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP-2) is a mitochondrial inner membrane protein that allows diffusion of protons across the membrane without production of ATP, by uncoupling oxidation of substrates from ATP synthesis.11,36 Rizki et al9 reported that the MCD diet induces an increase in fatty acid flux through the β-oxidation pathway, which is associated with higher expression of UCP-2 and a marked decrease in ATP. Serviddio et al37 found that the mitochondria isolated from patients with NASH or from rats fed the MCD diet, showed increased mitochondrial proton leak and upregulation of UCP-2. These changes were associated with increased production of mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide and HNE-protein adducts, and decreased hepatic ATP content, indicative of oxidative stress. We found that, as reported, feeding the MCD diet to wt mice caused a large increase in the expression of UCP-2 mRNA. However, such an increase did not occur in MCD-fed Gclm null mice; in these animals, UCP-2 mRNA expression was ~2.5 lower than that of wt mice (Figure 9c). These results are consistent with the conclusion that Gclm null mice fed the MCD diet do not have high levels of oxidative stress, as demonstrated by the iPF data. UCP-2 mRNA expression was similar in all animals fed the MCS diet regardless of genotype. PPARα contributes to fatty acid oxidation by regulating the expression of CPT-1, the rate-limiting enzyme for fatty acid transport into the mitochondria, and stimulating enzymes involved in β-oxidation in the mitochondria and peroxisomes.11 In animals fed the MCD diet, PPARα expression decreased by approximately five and threefold in Gclm null and wt mice, respectively (Figure 9d).

Global Analysis of Liver Gene Expression in Gclm Null Mice

Taken together, the results presented so far show that the MCD diet causes much less hepatic injury, steatosis, and fibrosis in Gclm null mice compared with wt mice, and that Gclm null mice may have developed protective mechanisms against the production or accumulation of lipid peroxidation products. As evaluated by the activity of key enzymes, and mRNA expression, Gclm null animals, almost entirely shut off triglyceride synthesis when fed the MCD diet, and decrease de novo fatty acid synthesis and triglyceride transport, without increasing β-oxidation.

Given these unexpected results, we reasoned that these animals must have developed mechanisms that compensate for the loss of GSH, and are effective in attenuating or preventing oxidative stress, and maintaining low hepatic triglyceride levels. To examine the patterns of gene expression in the livers of wt and Gclm null mice, we performed a microarray analysis of liver mRNA. Analysis of the microarray data showed that in Gclm null mice, 95 genes were expressed at more than twofold above and 88 genes were expressed at more than twofold lower than wt. These genes were selected for input to the NIH DAVID Functional Annotation, the enriched categories were identified by the KEGG pathway database, and ranked by P-values determined by EASE scores (Table 2). Genes included in each category of overexpressed genes in Gclm null mice are listed in Table 3. Five KEGG categories were upregulated (metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, GSH metabolism, arachidonic acid metabolism, PPAR signaling pathway, and pyrimidine pathway), and two were downregulated (complement and coagulation cascades, and androgen and estrogen metabolism) in Gclm null mice compared with wt animals.

Table 2.

KEGG pathways significantly enriched within genes the expression of which is changed in Gclm null mice

KEGG pathway Count % P-value Fold enrichment
From genes upregulated in Gclm null mice
 Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 11 11.6 4.2E–10 16.3
 Glutathione metabolism 7 7.4 2.1E–6 17
 Arachidonic acid metabolism 5 5.3 4.4E–3 7.2
 PPAR signaling pathway 4 4.2 3.2E–2 5.6
 Pyrimidine metabolism 4 4.2 4.7E–2 4.8
From genes downregulated in Gclm null mice
 Complement and coagulation cascades 4 4.5 1.2E–2 8.0
 Androgen and estrogen metabolism 3 3.4 3.8E–2 9.4

Pathways were identified by NIH DAVID Functional Annotation and ranked by P-value determined by EASE score. Counts and percentages refer to the number and percentage of genes from the input list that fit into a given KEGG pathway. Fold enrichment is the magnitude of enrichment for each KEGG pathway compared with the entire mouse genome that serves as the reference.

Table 3.

Partial list of genes included in the enriched KEGG pathways, which are upregulated in the livers of Gclm null mice compared with wt mice

KEGG pathway Genes
Metabolism of xenobiotics by p450 Cyp 2a5,Cyp 2b9, Cyp 2b13, Cyp 2c38, Cyp 3a16, Cyp 3a41
Glutathione metabolism Glutathione-S-transferases (Gsta2, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3, Gstm4)
Sulphotranferases (Sult2A2, Sult 3A1)
Glutathione reductase (Gsr1)
Glutamate-cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit
Arachidonic acid metabolism Carbonyl reductases 1 and 3
Cyp 2c38, 2b9, 2b13
PPAR-signaling pathway PPARγ
Lipoprotein lipase
CD36 antigen
Pyrimidine pathway Thioredoxin reductase 1
Cytidine deaminase
5′ nucleotidase
Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 5

Examples of notable genes upregulated in Gclm null mice within the enriched KEGG categories determined by NIH DAVID.

The results from the microarray analysis were compared with changes in gene expression using real-time RT-PCR analysis to validate the expression changes seen in the microarray. Seven genes that were significantly changed in the array platform were also analyzed using qPCR (Figure 10). There was a close correlation between the fold change in microarray and qPCR data, as linear regression analysis showed a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.913. HO-1 protein levels were higher in liver Gclm null mice compared with wt mice as determined by western blotting (Supplementary Figure 1). Genes included in the KEGG pathway analysis that were overexpressed in the liver of Gclm null mice are listed in Table 3. The high expression of genes for cytochrome p450 enzymes and that of ATP-binding cassette genes, multidrug-resistant genes Abcc4 and Abcd2 (not included in Table 3) indicates that Gclm null mice have a high capacity to metabolize xenobiotics and endogenous compounds such as steroids and lipids, and to facilitate their transport into peroxisomes. In addition, gclm null mice had higher expression of genes for antioxidant enzymes than did wt mice, including various forms of GSH-S-transferase (Gstm), sulphotransferases (Sult), carbonyl reductase 3 (Cbr3), sul-phiredoxin (Npn3/Srx), thioredoxin reductase (Txnrd1), heme oxigenase (HO-1), and NAD(P)-quinone oxyreductase (Nqo1). Members of the thioredoxin superfamily scavenge ROS and maintain intracellular redox status.38 Increased expression of thioredoxin and sulphoredoxin mRNAs were confirmed in a second round of microarray analysis using a different group of wt and Gclm null mice (not shown), but there was no difference in the expression of GSH peroxidase mRNA between wt and Gclm null mice.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Correlation of gene expression data obtained by cDNA microarray and qPCR. Differences in gene expression between wt and gclm null liver RNA from analyses by cDNA microarray (expressed as fold changes) and qPCR (expressed as ΔΔCt). (r2) = 0.913. Gene symbols: Cbr3 (carbonyl reductase 3), Cbr1 (carbonyl reductase 1), HO-1 (heme oxygenase 1), gclc (glutamate-cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit), PAI-1 ( plasminogen activator inhibitor 1), RRM2 (ribonucleotide reductase M2), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), scd1 (stearoyl-Co enzyme A desatuase-1).

With regard to lipid metabolism-related genes, compared with wt mice, Gclm null mice showed higher expression of mRNAs encoding mitochondrial and peroxisomal thioesterases (Acots) and lipoprotein lipase (Lpl), as well as lower expression of FAS (Fasn), fatty acid-binding protein 5 (Fapb5), and SCD-1.

In summary, gene expression data showed that the liver of Gclm null mice has a high capacity to metabolize endogenous compounds and xenobiotics, high expression of antioxidant enzymes, and metabolic changes that protect against lipid accumulation.39

DISCUSSION

We examined the role of GSH deficiency in the development of diet-induced steatohepatitis using Gclm null mice in which hepatic GSH levels are constitutively decreased by ~85%. On the basis of data obtained from NASH patients and animal models that indicate an association between depletion of hepatic GSH and development of steatohepatitis,11,39 we expected that the drastic GSH deficiency present in Gclm null mice would enhance the progression of steatosis to steato-hepatitis and produce more severe hepatic injury. Instead, we found that despite their very low GSH levels, Gclm null mice were to a great extent protected against the development of steatohepatitis induced by the MCD diet. As shown by NAFLD activity scores, assessment of fibrosis, and measurements of levels of hepatic triglycerides, MCD-fed Gclm null mice developed much less steatosis, hepatocyte ballooning, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis than did wt mice fed the same diet. These results are unexpected as GSH is one of the main antioxidant defenses in the liver, and GSH-enhancing agents generally protect against diet-induced steatohepatitis.11,20

The elevation of F2-isoprostanes in the liver of patients with NAFLD and in rodent models of diet-induced steatosis and steatohepatitis suggests that the increase in F2-iso-prostanes precedes inflammation and fibrosis in the development of NASH.15,40 Besides being markers for oxidative damage and inducers of inflammation, F2-isoprostanes can stimulate proliferation and collagen production in HSCs, and also induce the secretion of TGF-β from cultured cells.14 The much lower level of F2-isoprostanes in MCD-fed Gclm null mice suggests that, compared with wt mice, these animals produce less ROS, and also have a better capacity to dispose of ROS through catalase activity. In addition, the high expression of HO-1 in the liver of Gclm null mice provides another mechanism for antioxidant defense, as it has been shown that HO-1 protects against the development of steatohepatitis in mice, prevents fat accumulation in cultured AML-12 mouse hepatocytes, and inhibits liver fibrosis when it is stably expressed in stellate cells.41,42

Mitochondrial dysfunction mediated by ROS production and high levels of UCP-2, a mitochondrial inner membrane protein, occurs in patients with NASH and in MCD-induced steatohepatitis.9 In the mitochondria isolated from these patients and MCD-fed rodents, UCP-2 causes a decrease in ATP and increases 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, a lipid peroxidation product.37 UCP-2 uncouples electron transport from ATP production, and ATP depletion induced by UCP-2 increases the susceptibility of the liver to various types of injury.37,43 As expected, wt mice fed the MCD diet showed an increase in UCP-2 mRNA (about fourfold above wt mice fed the MCS diet), but in marked contrast, feeding the MCD diet to Gclm null mice did not cause significant changes in UCP-2 mRNA. These results are further indication that MCD-fed Gclm null mice have much lower oxidative stress than do MCD-fed wt mice. However, conclusions about the relationships between oxidative stress and the severity of steatohepatitis or the development of fibrosis need to be made with caution, as in some experimental situations the level of lipoperoxides or oxidative stress does not correlate with the production of liver damage44 or fibrosis.19

Increased mitochondrial β-oxidation results in accumulation of electrons in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which can lead to increased production of superoxide anion16 and mitochondrial damage. Our analysis of ACO and CPT-1 expression suggests that the lower mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation in MCD-fed Gclm null mice compared with wt mice, may contribute to a lower level of oxidative stress and decreased formation of ROS in MCD-fed Gclm null mice. Of note is the finding that the mRNA for CPT-1, a rate-limiting regulator of mitochondrial β-oxidation through its role in mitochondrial fatty acid import, decreases in MCD-fed Gclm null mice, while it greatly increases in MCD-fed wt mice. Thus, Gclm null mice do not appear to rely strongly on mitochondrial β-oxidation as a mechanism for fatty acid disposal upon feeding the MCD diet, perhaps because of the absence of an excess of hepatic fat in these animals.

In Gclm null mice fed the MCD diet, mRNA for SCD-1, an enzyme required for triglyceride synthesis, decreases drastically, essentially shutting off triglyceride synthesis and accumulation. SCD-1 mRNA also decreases in MCD-fed wt mice as described previously,9 but SCD-1 mRNA levels are approximately sevenfold lower in MCD-fed Gclm null mice. Suppression of hepatic SCD-1 is associated with hyperme-tabolism and weight loss in mice fed the MCD diet. In our experiments, after 3 weeks of MCD feeding, wt mice had lost ~30% of their weight and Gclm null mice lost ~20% (data not shown), indicating that the diet generated a lower hypermetabolic state in null mice, despite the stronger suppression of SCD-1 in these mice.

The attenuated effects of the MCD diet on Gclm null mice suggest that these animals have developed compensatory mechanisms that protect the hepatocyte against metabolic abnormalities caused by low levels of GSH. Indeed, liver triglycerides are lower in Gclm null mice fed standard chow or the MCS control diet. The global analysis of hepatic gene expression in Gclm null mice indicates that these animals seem to have a heightened capacity to metabolize endogenous and exogenous compounds, and may have developed protective mechanisms against oxidative stress. It is known that there is a close interaction between drug metabolism and lipid homeostasis, and recent data suggest that this interaction is mediated by the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and the pregnane X receptor.45 It is possible that the lower levels of lipogenic proteins in Gclm null mice, and their relative resistance to the development of diet-induced steatohepatitis may be a consequence of CAR activation.46 A more detailed analysis of these mechanisms may reveal some important features of metabolic adaptations that can prevent oxidative injury in the liver. These data raise the question on whether low oxidative stress in MCD-fed Gclm null mice is a primary defense mechanism or a consequence of small fat accumulation. The latter hypothesis would imply that there is a threshold level of fat accumulation, below which little lipid peroxidation occurs.

In summary, we directly assessed the effect of GSH depletion on the development of steatohepatitis, and showed that mice that are genetically deficient in Gclm and have low levels of hepatic GSH, develop compensatory mechanisms that largely protect them against diet-induced liver injury, and greatly attenuate the progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis. These compensatory mechanisms may offer novel strategies for the prevention of NASH.

Supplementary Material

Sup Fig 1

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Geoffrey C Farrell for discussions that led to this study and for his advice during its early phases. This work was supported by NIH grants R01CA127228 (to JS Campbell), R37CA023226 and R01CA074131 (to N Fausto), NIEHS grants P30ES07033, U19ES011387, and R01ES10849 (to T Kavanagh), and NIEHS Training Program T32ES007032 (Postdoctoral Fellowship to J Haque; Predoctoral Fellowship to R McMahan).

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Laboratory Investigation website (http://www.laboratoryinvestigation.org)

DISCLOSURE/CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Delgado JS. Evolving trends in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chitturi S, Farrell GC, Hashimoto E, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: definitions and overview of proposed guidelines. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:778–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clark JM, Diehl AM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an underrecognized cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis. JAMA. 2003;289:3000–3004. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cortez-Pinto H, de Moura MC, Day CP. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: from cell biology to clinical practice. J Hepatol. 2006;44:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farrell GC, Larter CZ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006;43(2 Suppl 1):S99–S112. doi: 10.1002/hep.20973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vetelainen R, van Vliet A, van Gulik TM. Essential pathogenic and metabolic differences in steatosis induced by choline or methione-choline deficient diets in a rat model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1526–1533. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rinella ME, Elias MS, Smolak RR, et al. Mechanisms of hepatic steatosis in mice fed a lipogenic methionine choline-deficient diet. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:1068–1076. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800042-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gyamfi MA, Damjanov I, French S, et al. The pathogenesis of ethanol versus methionine and choline deficient diet-induced liver injury. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:981–995. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rizki G, Arnaboldi L, Gabrielli B, et al. Mice fed a lipogenic methionine-choline-deficient diet develop hypermetabolism coincident with hepatic suppression of SCD-1. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:2280–2290. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600198-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larter CZ, Yeh MM. Animal models of NASH: getting both pathology and metabolic context right. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1635–1648. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Varela-Rey M, Embade N, Ariz U, et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and animal models: understanding the human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:969–976. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Day CP, James OF. Steatohepatitis: a tale of two ‘hits’? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:842–845. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70599-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haukeland JW, Damas JK, Konopski Z, et al. Systemic inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is characterized by elevated levels of CCL2. J Hepatol. 2006;44:1167–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Comporti M, Arezzini B, Signorini C, et al. F2-isoprostanes stimulate collagen synthesis in activated hepatic stellate cells: a link with liver fibrosis? Lab Invest. 2005;85:1381–1391. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu MJ, Sun LJ, Liu YQ, et al. Blood F2-isoprostanes are significantly associated with abnormalities of lipid status in rats with steatosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4677–4683. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pessayre D, Fromenty B. NASH: a mitochondrial disease. J Hepatol. 2005;42:928–940. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tilg H, Moschen AR. Inflammatory mechanisms in the regulation of insulin resistance. Mol Med. 2008;14:222–231. doi: 10.2119/2007-00119.Tilg. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Syn WK, Teaberry V, Choi SS, et al. Similarities and differences in the pathogenesis of alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis. 2009;29:200–210. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Syn WK, Yang L, Chiang DJ, et al. Genetic differences in oxidative stress and inflammatory responses to diet-induced obesity do not alter liver fibrosis in mice. Liver Int. 2009;29:1262–1272. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02036.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oz HS, Im HJ, Chen TS, et al. Glutathione-enhancing agents protect against steatohepatitis in a dietary model. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2006;20:39–47. doi: 10.1002/jbt.20109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Phung N, Pera N, Farrell G, et al. Pro-oxidant-mediated hepatic fibrosis and effects of antioxidant intervention in murine dietary steatohepatitis. Int J Mol Med. 2009;24:171–180. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Forman HJ, Zhang H, Rinna A. Glutathione: overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Franklin CC, Backos DS, Mohar I, et al. Structure, function, and post-translational regulation of the catalytic and modifier subunits of glutamate cysteine ligase. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30:86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McConnachie LA, Mohar I, Hudson FN, et al. Glutamate cysteine ligase modifier subunit deficiency and gender as determinants of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2007;99:628–636. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Y, Dieter MZ, Chen Y, et al. Initial characterization of the glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit Gclm(−/−) knockout mouse. Novel model system for a severely compromised oxidative stress response. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:49446–49452. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209372200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Botta D, Shi S, White CC, et al. Acetaminophen-induced liver injury is attenuated in male glutamate-cysteine ligase transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28865–28875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605143200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coe KJ, Jia Y, Ho HK, et al. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of the nitroaromatic drug flutamide to its cyano analogue in the hepatocyte cell line TAMH: evidence for complex I inhibition and mitochondrial dysfunction using toxicogenomic screening. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007;20:1277–1290. doi: 10.1021/tx7001349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu Z, Irizarry RA. Preprocessing of oligonucleotide array data. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:656–658. doi: 10.1038/nbt0604-656b. author reply 658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yeh MM, Brunt EM. Pathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:837–847. doi: 10.1309/RTPM1PY6YGBL2G2R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wanders RJ, Vreken P, Ferdinandusse S, et al. Peroxisomal fatty acid alpha- and beta-oxidation in humans: enzymology, peroxisomal metabolite transporters and peroxisomal diseases. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001;29(Pt 2):250–267. doi: 10.1042/0300-5127:0290250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cortez-Pinto H, Machado MV. Uncoupling proteins and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2009;50:857–860. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Serviddio G, Bellanti F, Tamborra R, et al. UCP2 induces mitochondrial proton leak and increases susceptibility of NASH liver to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Gut. 2008;57:957–965. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.147496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ahsan MK, Lekli I, Ray D, et al. Redox regulation of cell survival by the thioredoxin superfamily: an implication of redox gene therapy in the heart. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:2741–2758. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu SC. Regulation of glutathione synthesis. Mol Aspects Med. 2009;30:42–59. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Konishi M, Iwasa M, Araki J, et al. Increased lipid peroxidation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis C as measured by the plasma level of 8-isoprostane. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1821–1825. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tsui TY, Lau CK, Ma J, et al. rAAV-mediated stable expression of heme oxygenase-1 in stellate cells: a new approach to attenuate liver fibrosis in rats. Hepatology. 2005;42:335–342. doi: 10.1002/hep.20803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yu J, Chu ES, Wang R, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 protects against steatohepatitis in both cultured hepatocytes and mice. Gastro-enterology. 2010;138:694–704. 704, e691. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fulop P, Derdak Z, Sheets A, et al. Lack of UCP2 reduces Fas-mediated liver injury in ob/ob mice and reveals importance of cell-specific UCP2 expression. Hepatology. 2006;44:592–601. doi: 10.1002/hep.21310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Larter CZ, Yeh MM, Williams J, et al. MCD-induced steatohepatitis is associated with hepatic adiponectin resistance and adipogenic transformation of hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2008;49:407–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Roth A, Looser R, Kaufmann M, et al. Regulatory cross-talk between drug metabolism and lipid homeostasis: constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor increase Insig-1 expression. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73:1282–1289. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.041012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dong B, Saha PK, Huang W, et al. Activation of nuclear receptor CAR ameliorates diabetes and fatty liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18831–18836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909731106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Sup Fig 1

RESOURCES