Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1966 Jan;91(1):198–204. doi: 10.1128/jb.91.1.198-204.1966

Specific Cell-Surface Alteration by Enteroviruses as Reflected by Viral-Attachment Interference1

Richard L Crowell a,2
PMCID: PMC315932  PMID: 4285531

Abstract

Crowell, Richard L. (Hahnemann Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa.). Specific cell-surface alteration by enteroviruses as reflected by viral-attachment interference. J. Bacteriol. 91:198–204. 1966.—Exposure of HeLa cells to high levels of coxsackievirus B3 produced cells which were refractory to attachment of coxsackievirus B1, whereas poliovirus T2 attached normally. Under similar conditions, poliovirus T2 was found to interfere with the attachment of poliovirus T1 to HeLa cells without affecting the attachment rate of coxsackievirus B3. The data confirm earlier findings that the receptor sites on HeLa cells, which bind members of group B coxsackieviruses, are distinct from those for polioviruses. Quantitatively, coxsackieviruses B1 and B3 were found to be mutually exclusive in the attachment interference assay to suggest that they compete for the same receptors on the HeLa cell surface. The finding that input multiplicities of B3 virus which exceeded 500 saturated the homologous viral receptors of HeLa cells was unexpected, but was consistent with the results of interference assays. Excessive amounts of input virus did not, however, inhibit eclipse of homologous cell-associated virus. Attachment interference between enteroviruses occurred even though the interfering virus was eclipsed prior to addition of challenge virus. The finding that enterovirus attachment interference was reversible with acid pH suggested that attachment and eclipse of enterovirus does not result in a permanent alteration of the cell membrane and that these events occur at the cell surface.

Full text

PDF
200

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COOPER P. D. RESCUE OF ONE PHENOTYPE IN MIXED INFECTIONS WITH HEAT-DEFECTIVE MUTANTS OF TYPE 1 POLIOVIRUS. Virology. 1965 Mar;25:431–438. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CORDS C. E., HOLLAND J. J. INTERFERENCE BETWEEN ENTEROVIRUSES AND CONDITIONS EFFECTING ITS REVERSAL. Virology. 1964 Feb;22:226–234. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(64)90007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CROWELL R. L. SPECIFIC VIRAL INTERFERENCE IN HELA CELL CULTURES CHRONICALLY INFECTED WITH COXSACKIE B5 VIRUS. J Bacteriol. 1963 Sep;86:517–526. doi: 10.1128/jb.86.3.517-526.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CROWELL R. L., SYVERTON J. T. The mammalian cell-virus relationship. VI. Sustained infection of HeLa cells by Coxsackie B3 virus and effect on superinfection. J Exp Med. 1961 Feb 1;113:419–435. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DALES S., EGGERS H. J., TAMM I., PALADE G. E. ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE FORMATION OF POLIOVIRUS. Virology. 1965 Jul;26:379–389. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DRAKE J. W. Interference and multiplicity reactivation in polioviruses. Virology. 1958 Aug;6(1):244–264. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FOGH J. Relation between multiplicity of exposure, adsorption, and cytopathogenic effect of poliomyelitis virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Virology. 1955 Sep;1(3):324–333. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(55)90028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HABEL K., HORNIBROOK J. W., GREGG N. C., SILVERBERG R. J., TAKEMOTO K. K. The effect of anticellular sera on virus multiplication in tissue culture. Virology. 1958 Feb;5(1):7–29. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HOLLAND J. J., CORDS C. E. MATURATION OF POLIOVIRUS RNA WITH CAPSID PROTEIN CODED BY HETEROLOGOUS ENTEROVIRUSES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Jun;51:1082–1085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.6.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOLLAND J. J., HOYER B. H. Early stages of enterovirus infection. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1962;27:101–112. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1962.027.001.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HOLLAND J. J. INHIBITION OF HOST CELL MACROMOLECULAR SYNTHESIS BY HIGH MULTIPLICITIES OF POLIOVIRUS UNDER CONDITIONS PREVENTING VIRUS SYNTHESIS. J Mol Biol. 1964 Apr;8:574–581. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HOLLAND J. J. Irreversible eclipse of poliovirus by HeLa cells. Virology. 1962 Feb;16:163–176. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(62)90292-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HOLLAND J. J., McLAREN L. C. Improved method for staining cell monolayers for virus plaque counts. J Bacteriol. 1959 Oct;78:596–597. doi: 10.1128/jb.78.4.596-597.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. JOKLIK W. K., DARNELL J. E., Jr The adsorption and early fate of purified poliovirus in HeLa cells. Virology. 1961 Apr;13:439–447. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(61)90275-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LEDINKO N. An analysis of interference between active polioviruses types 1 and 2 in HeLa cells. Virology. 1963 May;20:29–44. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(63)90138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LEDINKO N. Genetic recombination with poliovirus type 1. Studies of crosses between a normal horse serum-resistant mutant and several guanidine-resistant mutants of the same strain. Virology. 1963 May;20:107–119. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(63)90145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LEVINTOW L., DARNELL J. E., Jr A simplified procedure for purification of large amounts of poliovirus: characterization and amino acid analysis of Type 1 poliovirus. J Biol Chem. 1960 Jan;235:70–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MANDEL B. The use of sodium dodecyl sulfate in studies on the interaction of poliovirus and HeLa cells. Virology. 1962 Jun;17:288–294. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(62)90119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MOSLEY J. W., ENDERS J. F. A critique of the plaque assay technique in bottle culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1961 Nov;108:406–408. doi: 10.3181/00379727-108-26952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PHILIPSON L., LIND M. ENTEROVIRUS ECLIPSE IN A CELL-FREE SYSTEM. Virology. 1964 Jul;23:322–332. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(64)90254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. POHJANPELTO P., COOPER P. D. INTERFERENCE BETWEEN POLIOVIRUSES INDUCED BY STRAINS THAT CANNOT MULTIPLY. Virology. 1965 Mar;25:350–357. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WECKER E., LEDERHILGER G. GENOMIC MASKING PRODUCED BY DOUBLE-INFECTION OF HELA CELLS WITH HETEROTYPIC POLIOVIRUSES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Sep;52:705–709. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.3.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. ZAJAC I., CROWELL R. L. EFFECT OF ENZYMES ON THE INTERACTION OF ENTEROVIRUSES WITH LIVING HELA CELLS. J Bacteriol. 1965 Mar;89:574–582. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.3.574-582.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES