Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1213

Pseudophaeochromocytoma syndrome associated with clozapine

Andrew J Krentz 1,2,3, Sherine Mikhail 1,2,3, Paul Cantrell 1,2,3, Gavin M Hill 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC31620  PMID: 11358774

Clozapine (Clozaril, Novartis), a tricyclic dibenzodiazepine derivative, has an established role in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. In the United Kingdom the drug may only be prescribed by consultant psychiatrists registered with the Clozaril Patient Monitoring Service; this reflects the serious adverse effect profile of the drug, which includes agranulocytosis. Paradoxical hypertension with increased concentrations of urinary catecholamines has also been reported, albeit rarely and in association with other antipsychotic treatment.1

We describe four patients with a pseudophaeochromocytoma syndrome associated with clozapine. All had serious refractory psychiatric disturbances. Case 2 presented to a cardiology clinic with hypertension for which she was receiving bendrofluazide 2.5 mg daily, and case 3 was referred to a diabetes clinic with type 2 diabetes (treated with metformin 500 mg twice daily) and dyslipidaemia. Case 4 was initially referred to a renal clinic with hypertension. Profuse sweating, hypertension, and obesity were common to all the patients; intermittent tachycardia was noted in cases 1 to 3 (table). Renal and hepatic function were normal in all the patients, and there was no evidence of alternative causes of secondary hypertension. The interval between the start of clozapine treatment and the development of the clinical features varied (table), being evident within one week in case 1. Urinary catecholamine concentrations, measured in 24 hour collections during clozapine treatment, were increased in all four patients (table). To exclude the possibility of phaeochromocytoma, case 1 underwent computed tomography and cases 3 and 4 underwent isotopic imaging.2 In cases 1 and 2, urinary catecholamine concentrations normalised, and clinical features improved or resolved after withdrawal of the drug; these patients also lost several kilograms in body weight. Clozapine was continued at a lower dose in case 3 as the supervising psychiatrist advised against its withdrawal. Treatment was also continued in case 4 because his blood pressure settled spontaneously.

The neuropharmacological actions of clozapine are complex and include affinity for 5-HT2 receptors and for adrenergic receptors in vitro.3 Clozapine has been reported to cause increases in plasma noradrenaline concentrations, a postulated mechanism being the inhibition of resynaptic reuptake mediated by α2 adrenergic receptors.4 Sulpiride, which blocks presynaptic α2 adrenoreceptors, may have contributed to the clinical features in cases 2 and 4.5

We contacted the manufacturer, Novartis, and the Committee on Safety of Medicines about this adverse event.

Table.

Clinical details of patients and catecholamine concentrations

Case No Age (years) Sex Body mass index (kg/m2) Clozapine dose (mg/day) and duration of treatment* Other drugs Heart rate (beats/min) Blood pressure (mm Hg) 24 hour urinary catecholamine concentration (μmol) (reference range)
1 27 Male 31 400 for 2 months Fluoxetine 20 mg daily 110 170/120 Noradrenaline 1.68 (<0.59), vanillylmandelic acid 54 (<35)
2 28 Female 38 700 for 12 months Bendrofluazide 2.5 mg daily 104 143/112 Noradrenaline 1.02 (0.08-0.45)
3 38 Male 40 900 for 18 months Sulpiride 600 mg, venlafaxine 150 mg, and metformin 500 mg twice daily 130 156/100 Noradrenaline 0.53 (0.07-0.48), normetadrenaline 4.3 (0-3.00)
4 22 Male 30 600 for 3 months Sulpiride 200 mg daily and paroxetine 50 mg daily NA 180/120 Noradrenaline 0.90 (0.07-0.48), normetadrenaline 4.6 (0-3.00)

NA=not available. *Before measurement of 24 hour urinary catecholamine concentration. 

Average during ambulatory monitoring. 

Acknowledgments

AJK thanks Dr V J Lewington, Dr Robert Peckitt, and Dr Clare Bradley for their help with case 3 and Dr Mary Rogerson for her help with case 4.

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Li JKY, Yeung VTF, Lueung CM, Chow CC, Ko GTC, So WY, et al. Clozapine: a mimickry of phaeochromocytoma. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 1997;31:889–891. doi: 10.3109/00048679709065519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wittles RM, Kaplan EL, Roizen MF. Sensitivity of diagnostic and localization tests for phaeochromocytoma. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2521–2524. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.16.2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eresbefsky L, Watanabe MD, Tran-Johnson TK. Clozapine: an atypical antipsychotic agent. Clin Pharmacol. 1989;8:691–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davidson M, Kahn RS, Stern RG, Hirschowitz J, Apter S, Knott P, et al. Treatment with clozapine and its effect on plasma haemavanillic acid and norepinephrine concentrations in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1993;46:151–163. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(93)90017-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mayer RD, Montgomery SA. Acute hypertensive episode induced by sulpiride—a case report. Human Psychopharmacol. 1989;4:149–150. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES