Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Mar 30;155(1):128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2011.03.006

Identification of Differentially Expressed Thyroid Hormone Responsive Genes from the Brain of the Mexican Axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum)

P Huggins a,1, CK Johnson b,1, A Schoergendorfer a,1, S Putta b, AC Bathke a, AJ Stromberg a, SR Voss b,*
PMCID: PMC3166550  NIHMSID: NIHMS285703  PMID: 21457787

Abstract

The Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) presents an excellent model to investigate mechanisms of brain development that are conserved among vertebrates. In particular, metamorphic changes of the brain can be induced in free-living aquatic juveniles and adults by simply adding thyroid hormone (T4) to rearing water. Whole brains were sampled from juvenile A. mexicanum that were exposed to 0, 8, and 18 days of 50 nM T4, and these were used to isolate RNA and make normalized cDNA libraries for 454 DNA sequencing. A total of 1,875,732 high quality cDNA reads were assembled with existing ESTs to obtain 5,884 new contigs for human RefSeq protein models, and to develop a custom Affymetrix gene expression array (Amby_002) with approximately 20,000 probe sets. The Amby_002 array was used to identify 303 transcripts that differed statistically (p < 0.05, fold change > 1.5) as a function of days of T4 treatment. Further statistical analyses showed that Amby_002 performed concordantly in comparison to an existing, small format expression array. This study introduces a new A. mexicanum microarray resource for the community and the first lists of T4-responsive genes from the brain of a salamander amphibian.

1. Introduction

Thyroid hormone (TH) is essential for normal development of the mammalian brain. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal TH levels are closely regulated in temporal and spatial contexts to affect proper cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation, and to orchestrate synaptogenesis and myelination of neurons (Anderson et al., 2003; Koibuchi, 2008; Patel et al., 2011). Later in life, thyroid hormone affects the activity of neuroendocrine axes that regulate reproduction, appetite, behavior, stress response, and longevity (Ooka and Shinkai, 1986; Shi et al., 1994; Gussekloo et al., 2004; Kong et al., 2004; Brambilla et al., 2006; Leggio et al., 2008; Duval et al., 2010; Krassas et al., 2010). That so many fundamental biological processes are associated with the action of a single molecule reflects in part the molecular mechanisms through which TH operates. It has been known for some time that TH interacts with nuclear receptors (TRα or TRβ) and cofactors to regulate transcription directly (Openheimer et al., 1974; Samuels et al., 1974; Sap et al., 1986; Weinberger et al., 1986), and recent studies are beginning to use unbiased approaches to identify TH-regulated genes in the brain (e.g. Royland et al., 2008; Das et al., 2009). Much less is known about the way TH signals via “non-genomic” mechanisms, including membrane receptors, transporter molecules, and cytoplasmic receptors that elicit changes in cells through signaling pathways (Caria et al., 2009; reviewed by Davis et al., 2008; Furuya et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2010). Identification of additional TH-regulated genes and molecular mechanisms will require continued studies of traditional models and development of new models.

Many mechanisms that are associated with TH synthesis, activation, and transcriptional regulation are evolutionarily conserved among vertebrates, and these presumably function during homologous stages of development (Tata, 1993; 2006). Thus, it is possible to investigate mechanisms of mammalian brain development in more experimentally tractable organisms with free-living embryonic and juvenile phases. Anuran amphibians in particular have been extensively studied because it is straightforward to induce metamorphosis in tadpoles with TH and investigate how TH affects developmental changes in vivo through interactions with TRs, accessory co-factors, and changes in chromatin state (e.g. Shi, 2000; Das et al., 2010; Bilesimo et al., 2011). TH levels increase precipitously during anuran metamorphosis to regulate the development of adult tissue and organ systems from pre-existing larval structures and progenitor cell populations. In humans, TH levels similarly increase as the brain matures during the perinatal stage of early development (Brown et al., 2005). Thus, the study of anuran metamorphosis may identify TH-dependent mechanisms that are critical for normal human brain development. However, there are limitations in using anuran models to study the actions of TH. Although it is straightforward to administer TH, dosing regimes are generally administered at developmental stages when TH levels are relatively low in tadpoles. Because genes maybe differentially responsive to TH as a function of age, precocious administration of TH may activate or repress genes that are not typical of normal development and metamorphosis. Also, when tadpoles of spontaneously metamorphosing anurans are exposed to TH, they are already developing toward a metamorphic endpoint; thus anurans do not provide a true negative control for evaluating TH signaling.

The Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) provides an alternative amphibian model to investigate TH signaling (Page et al., 2007; 2008; 2009). While many amphibians undergo an obligate metamorphosis, A. mexicanum juveniles fail to produce enough TH to induce metamorphosis (Kuhn, 1989; Galton 1991). As a result, A. mexicanum retain juvenile traits into the adult stage of life, an adaptation that has been termed paedomorphosis. Importantly, metamorphosis can be induced in A. mexicanum by simply adding the thyroxine form of TH (T4) to the water (Page and Voss, 2009). Thus, developmental events can be induced within the context of a natural, hypothyroid condition at juvenile or adult stages of life. In A. mexicanum, paedomorphosis is associated with an unidentified genetic factor that affects developmental timing, response to T4, and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid function (Voss and Smith 2005; Galton 1991; Rosenkilde, 1996; Kuhn 2005).

In previous studies, we used microarray analysis to show that metamorphosis is precisely and reliably induced in A. mexicanum using 5 or 50 nM T4 (Page et al., 2007; Page et al., 2008). We also reported an integrative model of epidermal gene expression and whole-animal anatomical metamorphosis (Page et al., 2009). Here, we report on a study that used highly parallel 454 DNA sequencing to discover genes from the A. mexicanum brain. The resulting sequence reads were assembled with pre-existing ESTs from Sal-Site (www.ambystoma.org) to design a 2nd generation custom Affymetrix expression array (Amby_002). This new microarray platform was then used to identify genes that are differentially expressed in the A. mexicanum brain after treatment with T4. Our study enhances the A. mexicanum model by providing a new microarray resource and new EST contigs that increase the total number of Ambystoma-human non-redundant orthologous sequences to >15,000. Also, our study provides the first lists of T4 -responsive genes from a salamander amphibian, including genes that are predicted to function in neural developmental and physiological processes within the brain.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Animals and Tissue Sampling

Nine A. mexicanum juvenile siblings were obtained from the Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center at the University of Kentucky and reared under the same laboratory conditions to approximately 130 days post hatching. At this age, individuals are immature with respect to gonad maturation and have surpassed the time that metamorphosis typically occurs in related species. Three individuals were anesthetized in 0.02% benzocaine and the brains and pituitaries of each were removed, flash frozen in ethanol and liquid nitrogen, and stored separately at -80 C until the time of RNA isolation. The other 6 individuals were reared individually in a 50 nM T4 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; T2376) prepared according to the method of Page and Voss (2009). When juveniles are reared in 50 nM T4, morphological metamorphosis initiates approximately 8 days after treatment, morphology rapidly changes between days 15-20, and metamorphosis is completed after approximately 28-32 days (Page et al., 2009). We observed early signs of anatomical metamorphosis at Day 8 and changes indicative of metamorphic climax at D18. After 8 and 18 days of treatment, 3 individuals were sacrificed and brain/pituitary tissue was removed and stored as described above. This sampling design yielded three replicates of brain tissue for three groups: no T4 (D0), early metamorphosis (D8), and metamorphic climax (D18). Animal care and use was carried out under University of Kentucky IACUC protocols #01087L2006 and #00907L2005.

2.2 RNA isolation and 454 DNA sequencing

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and RNA samples were further purified using Qiagen RNeasy mini-columns. RNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 and Agilent BioAnalyzer. RNA from one replicate of each treatment was used to make cDNA libraries for 454 DNA sequencing. We refer to these as 454_D0, 454_D8, and 454_D18. cDNA libraries were generated using standard methods of MINT cDNA synthesis and TRIMMER cDNA normalization kits from EVROGEN, Inc; sequences were size-selected according to manufacturer's instructions. cDNAs were sequenced by the University of Iowa Biology Department Sequencing Core using the Genome Sequencer FLX System with Titanium Chemistry (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). SeqClean (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/software) was used for vector/poor quality trimming, bacterial contaminant screening, and identification of A. mexicanum mitochondrial DNA and rDNA sequences. Retained sequences were assembled using Newbler (Version 2.0.01.14) from 454 Life Sciences. Contigs (including singletons) were searched using BLAST algorithms against the Ambystoma ESTdb at Sal-Site (Smith et al., 2005), and NCBI protein and nucleotide databases. Queries that returned significant BLAST hits were assigned the gene identifier of the best-matching subject sequence. 454 DNA sequence reads were assembled with previous EST data and the overall assembly is available at Sal-Site. Assembled contigs were submitted to Affymetrix to design approximately 20,000 perfect-match probe sets for a custom gene expression array: Amby_002 (Part Number 520748).

2.3 Microarray Analysis

Genome-level expression profiling was conducted using Amby_002 and Amby_001, a small format array (∼4500 probe sets) that was designed in 2005 from approximately 60,000 ESTs (Smith et al., 2005). Amby_001 has been used to quantify gene expression in several experiments (Page et al., 2007, 2008; Monaghan et al., 2007, 2009; Cotter et al 2008), including an experiment that examined brain tissues from A. mexicanum and A. t. tigrinum (Page et al., 2010). RNA from all 9 of the brain samples was labeled, hybridized to separate Amby_002 arrays, and scanned by the University of Kentucky Microarray Core Facility according to standard Affymetrix protocols. We also hybridized the three D0 and D18 replicates to six Amby_001 arrays to investigate concordance and discordance between the Affy platforms. Background correction, normalization, and expression summaries were obtained using the robust multi-array average (RMA) algorithm (Irizarry et al. 2003).

2.4 Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using microarrays

The expression data from Amby_002 were examined using standard F-tests to identify genes that were differentially expressed as a function of T4 treatment. Then t-tests were applied to this list of DEGs to identify the direction of gene expression change between the D0, D8, and D18 time points. For example, between D0 and D8 an expression change can be described as up, down, or unchanged. See Supplementary File 1 for details on how F-tests and t-tests were performed. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA) and R 2.11.0 (www.r-project.org).

2.5 Statistical comparison of microarray platforms

We applied several statistical techniques to compare expression values between Amby_001 and Amby_002 for the D0 and D18 groups. We restricted attention to 2601 comparable probe set pairs, i.e. pairs of probe sets that were designed to target the same gene. Probability values (p-values) for differential expression between groups D0 and D18 were computed for each microarray platform, using t-tests applied to RMA normalized expression values. We computed the Spearman correlation among p-values for Amby_001 and Amby_002, as well as correlation among log fold change expression values.

We then estimated the percentage of discordant comparable probe set pairs; i.e. comparable probe set pairs that exhibited detectable measurement differences between groups D0 and D18. To do this we computed p-values for the treatment × platform interaction in a linear model for gene expression. In order to avoid underestimating discordant probe set pairs, we used a highly sensitive counting approach that analyzed the interaction terms' overall p-value histogram, rather than testing individual p-values. A more in depth treatment of these statistical methods is provided in Supplemental File 1.

2.6 Identification of statistically enriched biological processes

To identify biological processes that were statistically enriched in lists of DEGs, we conducted enrichment analyses using PANTHER (Thomas et al., 2003). For all analyses, the probe sets on Amby_001 and Amby_002 that showed significant sequence identity to vertebrate NCBI RefSeq proteins were used to generate expected values (i.e., the background). Only gene ontology terms with two or more supporting genes were reported and the significance threshold was set to 0.05. The lists of significant GO terms were manually inspected to remove redundant terms.

3. Results

3.1 Identification of genes from A. mexicanum brain using 454 DNA sequencing

To generate new ESTs from A. mexcianum brain, cDNAs were synthesized for three brain samples: a brain isolated from a 133 day old individual (D0_454), and brains isolated from 141 and 151 day old individuals that had been reared for 8 and 18 days in 50 nM T4, respectively (D8_454; D18_454). Overall 2.06 × 106 reads were generated and this yielded approximately 584,000-699,000 high-quality sequence reads for each sample, with an average of 374 base pairs in length (Table 1). Typically, 30-50% of transcripts correspond to mitochondrial and ribosomal sequences when non-normalized cDNA libraries are sequenced (Putta et al. 2004; Monaghan et al., 2009). Here, application of a cDNA normalization procedure before sequencing efficiently reduced mitochondrial and ribosomal sequence reads to < 3%. Assembly of all high-quality cDNA reads yielded 915,442 unique sequences. These sequences were assembled with previous EST contigs from Monaghan et al. (2009) to produce 127,484 contigs each containing at least two overlapping sequences. All contigs and singletons were searched against NCBI databases to identify significant similarity matches that would suggest presumptive gene identities. A. mexicanum contigs and singletons yielded 62,100 significant hits to sequences in the human RefSeq database (BLASTx, e < 1 × 10-7), including 15,384 unique human genes. Assembly of the new brain-derived sequence reads with existing EST contigs from the Ambystoma EST database increased the number of non-redundant human-A. mexicanum orthologous sequences by 5,884, and these annotated to 129 and 127 different biological process and PANTHER pathway annotations, respectively. The highest numbers of genes annotated to general cellular (N=2110) and metabolic processes (N=2457) including cell communication (N=1607), signal transduction (N=1520), nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process (N=1174), and transport (N=1016) (Table 1). The annotations for Panther biological pathways show that the 454 DNA sequencing approach was highly successful in discovering new genes associated with neural developmental and physiological processes (Table 2). Genes for developmental signaling pathways were identified, including Wnt (N=119), Cadherin (N=59), PDGF (N=53), EGF (N=49), TGF-B (N=42), Endothelin (N=41), FGF (N=40), p53 (N=33), VEGF (N=32), PI3 kinase (N=31), IGF (N=30), Notch (N=15), and Hedgehog (N=10). Also, genes for a diverse group of neural receptor signaling pathways were identified, including those involving metabotrophic glutamate receptors (N=91), serotonin (5HT1-4) receptors (N=77), muscarinic acetylcholine receptors 1-4 (N=61), nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (N=39), GABA-B receptor 2 (N=17), and ionotropic glutamate receptors (N=38). Finally, genes were identified for thyrotrophin (N=33) and corticotrophin releasing factor signaling pathways (N=12), the later of which functions in amphibians to regulate the release of thyroid hormone and glucocorticoids during metamorphosis.

Table 1. 454 DNA sequence reads that were generated for each cDNA brain library.

454_D0 454_D8 454_D18 Totals
Total Reads 645415 651424 769018 2065857
Filtered 43664 51904 46150 141718
mtRNA/rRNA 6935 15288 23376 45599
Final Reads 594816 584232 696684 1875732

Table 2.

Annotation of genes discovered by 454 DNA sequencing to Panther biological processes with > 95 genes.

Panther Biological Process # Genes
metabolic process 2457
primary metabolic process 2374
cellular process 2110
cell communication 1607
signal transduction 1520
nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid 1174
transport 1016
developmental process 994
protein metabolic process 965
system process 922
cell surface receptor linked signal transduction 851
neurological system process 836
immune system process 778
system development 682
cell cycle 584
intracellular signaling cascade 545
protein transport 535
intracellular protein transport 535
ectoderm development 529
cell-cell signaling 521
response to stimulus 502
mesoderm development 497
nervous system development 488
cell adhesion 467
cellular component organization 454
vesicle-mediated transport 403
lipid metabolic process 369
cellular component morphogenesis 366
anatomical structure morphogenesis 366
cell motion 350
ion transport 336
reproduction 314
cell-cell adhesion 308
apoptosis 301
sensory perception 300
synaptic transmission 292
carbohydrate metabolic process 291
gamete generation 286
cation transport 282
endocytosis 201
mitosis 200
embryonic development 189
visual perception 186
muscle contraction 179
muscle organ development 171
immune response 166
response to stress 165
angiogenesis 164
skeletal system development 160
exocytosis 145
spermatogenesis 144
neurotransmitter secretion 144
heart development 133
cellular amino acid and derivative metabolic process 126
response to external stimulus 125
blood coagulation 125
pattern specification process 122
female gamete generation 116
cellular defense response 113
induction of apoptosis 107
blood circulation 98
negative regulation of apoptosis 95

3.2 Identification of differentially expressed genes using the Amby_002 GeneChip

The contigs that were assembled using brain 454 DNA reads and existing Sal-Site (www.ambystoma.org) ESTs were used to develop a custom Affymetrix expression array (Amby_002) with approximately 20,000 perfect-match probe sets. The Amby_002 microarray was used to estimate brain mRNA abundances from A. mexicanum juveniles that received 0, 8, and 18 days of 50 nM thyroid hormone (T4) treatment. Using statistical and fold change thresholds (p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.5 for at least one contrast), a total of 303 probe sets yielded significantly different hybridization intensities (transcript abundances) among the three time points that were compared (Supplemental File 2). The list of 303 DEGs included 16 redundant probe set pairs and 1 probe set trio that were designed to target the same reference gene. In all 17 of these cases, redundant probe sets registered similar estimates of transcript abundance and the same directional change among the time points. After accounting for probe set redundancy, the list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) includes 218 with predicted gene names and 67 that correspond to unknown transcripts.

PANTHER databases and tools were used to annotate gene ontologies to the 218 DEGs and identify enriched biological processes and pathways. First, the frequency of ontology terms for the 218 DEGs was compared to a reference list (N=11353) compiled for all annotatable probe sets on Amby_002. This yielded 11 enriched biological process ontologies (Table 4) and 7 PANTHER pathways at P < 0.05: cholesterol biosynthesis (N=4), glycolysis/fructose galactose metabolism (N=3), GABA-B receptor II signaling (N=4), Notch signaling pathway (N=4); formyltetrahydroformate biosynthesis (N=2), heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathway-Gi alpha and Gs alpha (N=6), and DNA replication (N=2). The overall DEG list was then partitioned to associate biological process ontologies with groups of genes that showed similar temporal changes in transcript abundance. For example, transcripts for 71 DEGs increased significantly between D0 and D8, while 40 DEGs decreased significantly during this time interval (Table 4). The DEGs that increased in abundance between D0 and D8 annotated to processes suggesting a role in cell cycle regulation. Several of these genes function to promote a cell's progression or arrest through the cell cycle (ccna2, cdk7, ccnc, ccncb3, tbrg4, cdnk1c, revl3). In comparison to the genes that increased during D0-D8, only 1 significant biological process (anion transport: chrne, chrng) was identified for genes that decreased in abundance between D0-D8. The majority of these genes mapped to different biological processes, although two genes (hes5, hes6) mapped to the Notch signaling pathway.

Table 4.

Annotation of 211 significantly differentially expressed genes with Panther biological process terms. No terms were identified as significant for DN D0-D18. UP = genes that increased in abundance; DN = genes that decreased in abundance.

Biological Process Term All Genes
(N=211)
UP D0-D8
(N=71)
DN D0-D8
(N=40)
UP D8-D18
(N=85)
DN D8-D18
(N=71)
UP D0-D18
(N=30)
metabolic process 122 45
primary metabolic process 116 42
system process 38
response to stimulus 30 12
lipid metabolic process 27 11 10
response to stress 12
blood circulation 9 4
chromosome segregation 8 4 5
coenzyme metabolic process 6 3
macrophage activation 6
regulation of liquid surface tension 3 2
neurological system process 16
cell cycle 14
mitosis 8
vitamin metabolic process 3
vitamin biosynthetic process 2
anion transport 2
acyl-CoA metabolic process 2
oxygen metabolic process 2
response to toxin 2
segment specification 3
sulfur metabolic process 3

More biological process terms were identified for DEGs identified for the D8-D18 time period (Table 4). Eight of 11 biological process ontology terms that were identified using all genes were also identified for the group of genes that decreased in abundance between D8 and D18, and many of these were associated with metabolic process terms. Also, genes that encode hemoglobin subunits (hbe, hba2) expressed during fetal stages of development in mammals were observed to decrease in abundance, as did growth hormone (gh1) and dnmt1, a methyltransferase that establishes and maintains tissue specific patterns of DNA methylation. Sixteen genes that are predicted to function in neurological system processes increased in abundance (Table 5), as did genes associated with lipid (N=11) and vitamin (N=5) metabolic processes. The neurological system process genes encode proteins that function in multiple processes, including steroid and peptide hormone binding (nr3c2, hcrtr2, nrip1), synaptogenesis (nlgn4x), synaptic transmission (ehd3, rasl11a, gda), and neural development and patterning (tulp3).

Table 5.

List of D0-D8 up-regulated genes that annotated to the neurological system process ontology term.

Gene Symbol Neurological Process
PRKX Serine/threonine-protein kinase PRKX
RASL11A Ras-like protein family member 11A
EHD3 EH domain-containing protein 3
RPE65 Retinal pigment epithelium-specific 65 kDa protein
HCRTR2 Orexin receptor type 2
MAPKAP3 MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 3
HTR5A 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 5A
MARS Methionyl-tRNA synthetase, cytoplasmic
PTH2 Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase 2, mitochondrial
ADORA1 Adenosine receptor A1
TULP3 Tubby-related protein 3
MARS Src-like-adapter 2
NR3C2 Mineralocorticoid receptor
KCNJ3 G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channel
ILF2 Interleukin enhancer-binding factor 2
NLGN4X Neuroligin-4, X-linked

3.3 Statistical comparison of microarray platforms

The same D0 and D18 samples that were hybridized to Amby_002 arrays were also hybridized to Amby_001, a first generation custom expression array with 3,729 gene-annotated probe sets. Mean D0 and D18 RMA log expression values were calculated for 2601 probe set pairs that presumably targeted the same gene on each array, and then the difference in mean expression (i.e. the log fold change) was compared between microarray platforms. Amby_001 and Amby_002 exhibited a Spearman correlation of rs = 0.76 for the complete list of probe sets. When measuring differentially expressed transcripts, the two platforms exhibited very strong statistical agreement; the correlation of log fold change increased to rs = 0.94 for 281 probe set pairs whose fold change was significant at p < 0.1 on both Amby_001 and Amby_002 (Figure 1; Supplemental File 3). We note that the strong correlation between microarray platforms is also robust to fold-change cutoff. For example, the correlation between platforms was at least rs = 0.93 for fold changes as small as 1.2 (Figure 2). As a further indication of the strong agreement between platforms, the estimated percentage of discordant probe set pairs between platforms was only 5.3%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Plot showing the D0-D18 difference in mean expression calculated for 281 probe sets identified at p < 0.1 from Amby_001 and Amby_002. The Spearman correlation is rs = 0.94 and the regression line is y = -0.014 + 1.062 ×.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for groups of comparable probe sets between Amby_001 and Amby_002. The groups were created from the complete list of 2601 comparable probe sets using fold change as a criterion.

4. Discussion

Amphibians provide excellent models to investigate the effects of thyroid hormone on development. An important advantage in using A. mexicanum over anuran models is the ability to reliably stimulate the onset of metamorphosis in juveniles or adults. This study is the first to use A. mexicanum to identify genes that are expressed differentially in the brain after inducing metamorphosis with T4. Below, we discuss the approach taken to identify new brain transcripts and measure their abundance during metamorphosis, and then discuss the gene expression results.

4.1. 454 DNA sequencing and gene discovery

Our study shows that 454 DNA sequencing can be used to efficiently discover genes from specific tissues and design microarray resources to reliably and precisely quantify temporal changes in gene expression. Over 5,800 new contigs that match human RefSeq proteins were assembled from 454 DNA reads that were sampled from three normalized cDNA A. mexicanum brain libraries. The normalization procedure greatly reduced the representation of mitochondrial and ribosomal sequences that are synthesized when using an oligo-dT priming approach to generate cDNA from RNA (Monaghan et al., 2009). This increased the discovery process for brain-associated transcripts. It is also important to note that the 454 DNA sequence generated from this study provided additional sequencing depth and length for existing EST contigs at Sal-Site. This allowed us to develop a new community resource – the Amby_002 expression array. We showed statistically that the new Amby_002 array provides estimates of gene expression that are concordant with the earlier Amby_001 array, however Amby_002 has approximately 5× more probe sets than Amby_001 and thus allows greater resolution of gene expression. Using Amby_002, we identified 303 differentially expressed brain transcripts that correspond to 218 A. mexicanum-human orthologous protein-coding sequences. Of the 218, 131 corresponded to probe sets that are unique to the Amby_002 array and are not represented on Amby_001. Thus, 60% of the DEGs that were identified in this study would not have been identified using the Amby_001 array.

4.2 TH-induced genes in the A. mexicanum brain

The DEGs identified in this study show that TH-induced brain metamorphosis in A. mexicanum is associated with a diversity of biological processes. These include genes that annotated to metabolic, cell cycle and signaling, and neurological systems ontologies. Thyroid hormone has long been associated with cellular macromolecular biosynthesis in both mammals and amphibians (Tata, 1993). As amphibian larvae mature, increasing levels of TH alter cellular metabolic processes to meet the energetic demands of metamorphosis. Three of the 7 significantly enriched PANTHER pathway terms identified from the complete list of DEGs annotated to cellular metabolic ontologies: glycolysis/fructose galactose metabolism (aldob, aldoc, hk2), formyltetrahydroformate biosynthesis (mthfd1, tyms), and cholesterol biosynthesis (fdps, hmgcs1, lss, pmvk). Other presumably up-regulated DEGs that were associated with metabolism but not identified by PANTHER include pea15 (autophagy and glucose metabolism), cyp2a13 (cholesterol/lipid metabolism in endoplasmic reticulum), cpt1a (fatty acid oxidation in mitochondria), pprc1 (activator of mitochondrial biogenesis), and cycs (electron transport in mitochondria). We note that TH-induced metabolic changes derive from changes in chromatin (dotl1, dnmt1), transcription (gtf2ird2b, tcea2), translation (eif4e2, etf1, mars, nars2, trmt12), and transport (rhot1, tspo, dirc2), and genes associated with these fundamental cellular processes were also identified.

With respect to cell cycle and signaling ontology terms, several genes were identified that encode proteins for regulation of cell cycle progression (ccna2, cdk7, ccnc, ccncb3, tbrg4, revl3) and arrest (cdnk1c). Although usp16 was not associated with the cell cycle ontology by PANTHER, this gene is thyroid hormone responsive in mammalian liver and associated with histone H2A deubiquitination and cell cycle progression (Pihlajamäki et al., 2009). Because the protein products of cell cycle genes are generally regulated post transcriptionally, their functional significance is unclear. However, it is well established that TH regulates neuronal and glial cell proliferation, migration, and maturation during early mammalian development (Anderson et al., 2003; Koibuchi, 2008; Patel et al., 2011). Genes that function to regulate such processes likely are members of major signaling pathways and this study identified DEGs belonging to MAPK (mapkapk3), Hedgehog (tulp3), Wnt (dkk3), FGF (fgfbp1), integrin (arf6, crk, col6a3), endothelin (adcy2, adcy8, and prkx), Notch (Hes5, Hes6, lfng, Notch1), and heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathways (adcy2, adcy8, adora1, kcnj3, htr5a1, prkx). Both adcy2 and adcy8 increased in abundance in response to TH; in mammals, the expression of adenylyl cyclases is developmentally regulated and associated with synaptic plasticity, behavior, and learning (Sanabra and Mengod, 2011). The Notch signaling pathway functions to regulate neural development by specifying cell proliferation and differentiation. All 4 Notch-pathway genes showed decreasing transcript abundances, a pattern suggestive of cell differentiation (Gaiano and Fishell, 2002). Future studies that localize mRNAs to specific cell types by in situ hybridization are needed to determine how these signaling pathways function to remodel existing neural networks and stimulate neurogenesis from progenitor cell populations.

The overall list of 218 DEGs contained 30 genes that annotated to the neural systems ontology. Sixteen of these genes were up regulated between D8-D18, and 4 of these are highlighted here: (1) hcrtr2, a cell surface receptor that binds hypothalamic peptides (orexin A and B) that regulate appetite and other behaviors (Wong et al., 2011); (2) nr3c2, a transcription factor that binds glucocorticoids and whose functions are associated with stress and aging (De Kloet et al., 1998); (3) tulp3, a heterotrimeric-G-protein-responsive intracellular signaling factor that functions in neural development and patterning (Cameron et al., 2003); and (4) nlgn4x which functions in synaptogenesis and is associated with autism (Bolliger et al., 2001).

4.3 Relationship of TH-induced genes to genes expressed during natural metamorphosis

A previous microarray study using Amby_001 compared the brain gene expression programs of chronologically matched larvae of A. mexicanum and A. tigrinum tigrinum, before and during the process of metamorphosis in the latter species (Page et al., 2010). In A. t. tigrinum, thyroid hormone increases during larval development (Norman et al., 1987) and this is thought to initiate metamorphosis through thyroid hormone receptors, as has been shown in anurans (Das et al., 2010). Hundreds of transcripts were observed to show the same temporal patterns of change between A. t. tigrinum and A. mexicanum, including genes associated with neural development and maturation. Thus, some aspects of brain development and function are conserved regardless of whether a larva is developing toward a metamorphic or paedomorphic outcome. However, many genes were expressed differently between the species and more profoundly so at the time A. t. tigrinum larvae underwent metamorphosis. These latter genes were interpreted as comprising a metamorphic transcriptional program, presumably induced directly or indirectly by increasing TH levels during development. A few of these presumptive metamorphic response genes were observed to show the same pattern of increase (ccdc43, hmga1, glul, dnajb13, rpe65, gpx1, cyp2a13, nr3c2, cartpt, dkk3) or decrease (tyms, dnmt1, ptx3, prim1, hbe1, hba2, smc4, s100a2, kiff22, pbk) in transcript abundance that was observed in this study. This validates these genes as TH-responsive and suggests that TH-response genes have been maintained in the paedomorphic A. mexicanum lineage since divergence from a common metamorphic ancestor (Shaffer and Voss, 1996). However, > 85% of the genes identified as uniquely expressed in A. t. tigrinum were not identified as differentially expressed in this study. This may reflect differences in experimental design and statistical approaches between the studies, and the possibility that TH-response varies among related species and at different times during ontogeny. Page et. al. (2010) characterized transcriptional responses when metamorphosis normally occurs in A. t. tigrinum (∼50-90 days), while this study induced metamorphosis in 139 day old A. mexicanum juveniles. It is possible that transcriptional patterns change in response to TH as the brain matures; unfortunately, we did not evaluate control samples (i.e. no thyroid hormone) from 147 (D8) and 157 (D18) day old A. mexicanum to test for this possibility. Another possibility is that transcription may be phenomenological with regard to TH treatment, although A. mexicanum show reproducible patterns of epidermal transcription across an order of magnitude range of TH treatment (Page et. al., 2008; 5-50 nM). Further studies are needed to investigate the transcriptional response to TH at different juvenile and adult stages of A. mexicanum development.

5. Conclusion

Amphibian metamorphosis provides an excellent model to study TH-responsive periods of development that are homologous among vertebrates. This study introduces a new A. mexicanum microarray resource for the community and the first lists of T4-responsive genes from the brain of a salamander amphibian. The Mexican axolotl (A. mexicanum) is an unusual, hypothyroidic salamander that is available from genetically homogenous laboratory stocks maintained at University of Kentucky. It will be important in future studies to detail transcriptional changes over narrower time intervals during metamorphosis, as this is a very dynamic process. Also, it will be important to determine how TH-induced transcriptional changes vary across species and ontogeny.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Table 3.

Annotation of genes discovered by 454 DNA sequencing to Panther biological pathways with > 10 genes.

Panther Pathway # Genes
Wnt signaling 119
Inflammation mediated by chemokine and cytokine 81
Angiogenesis 77
Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling -Gi, Gs 71
Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling -Gq, Go 60
Cadherin signaling 59
PDGF signaling 53
Huntington disease 51
EGF receptor signaling 49
Metabotropic glutamate receptor group III 47
Apoptosis signaling 43
TGF-beta signaling 42
Interleukin signaling 42
Integrin signalling 42
Endothelin signaling 41
FGF signaling 40
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling 39
Alzheimer disease-presenilin 38
Ionotropic glutamate receptor 38
p53 33
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 1 and 3 signaling 33
Thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor signaling 33
VEGF signaling 32
5HT2 type receptor mediated signaling 32
Parkinson disease 31
PI3 kinase 31
Insulin/IGF -protein kinase B signaling cascade 30
T cell activation 29
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor 2 and 4 signaling 29
Synaptic_vesicle_trafficking 27
Oxytocin receptor mediated signaling 27
Oxidative stress response 26
Alzheimer disease-amyloid secretase 25
Metabotropic glutamate receptor group II 24
Blood coagulation 23
Ras 22
B cell activation 22
Metabotropic glutamate receptor group I 20
Toll receptor signaling 19
Histamine H1 receptor mediated signaling 19
5HT1 type receptor mediated signaling 19
Alpha adrenergic receptor signaling 18
Adrenaline and noradrenaline biosynthesis 17
GABA-B_receptor_II_signaling 17
Beta2 adrenergic receptor signaling 17
Betal adrenergic receptor signaling 17
p53 feedback loops 2 16
Cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase 16
Transcription regulation by bZIP transcription factor 15
Notch signaling 15
5HT4 type receptor mediated signaling 15
Axon guidance mediated by semaphorins 14
Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling -rod outer segment 14
Axon guidance mediated by netrin 13
Insulin/IGF -mitogen activated protein kinase kinase/M 12
Hypoxia response via HIF activation 12
Cortocotropin releasing factor receptor signaling 12
De novo purine biosynthesis 11
5HT3 type receptor mediated signaling 11
Hedgehog signaling 10
General transcription regulation 10
Beta3 adrenergic receptor signaling 10

Acknowledgments

We thank Robert Page and Meredith Boley for inducing metamorphosis in the A. mexicanum juveniles that were used in this experiment and for collecting brain tissues. The research was supported by grant R24-RR016344 and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The project also used resources developed under Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative grant (W911NF-09-1-0305) from the Army Research Office, and resources from the Ambystoma Genetic Stock Center, which is funded by grant DBI-0951484 from the National Science Foundation. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NCRR, NIH, ARO, or NSF.

Footnotes

This paper is based on a presentation given at the 5th Aquatic Annual Models of Human Disease conference: hosted by Oregon State University and Texas State University-San Marcos, and convened at Corvallis, OR, USA September 20-22, 2010.

Contributor Information

P Huggins, Email: peter.huggins@uky.edu.

CK Johnson, Email: carlena.johnson@uky.edu.

A Schoergendorfer, Email: angela.sch@uky.edu.

S Putta, Email: sputt2@email.uky.edu.

AJ Stromberg, Email: astro11@email.uky.edu.

References

  1. Anderson GW, Schoonover CM, Jones SA. Control of thyroid hormone action in the developing rat brain. Thyroid. 2003;13:1039–1056. doi: 10.1089/105072503770867219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelband FJD, Ferrao FM, Einicker-Lamas M. Nongenomic signaling pathways triggered by thyroid hormones and their metabolite 3-iodothyronaime on the cardiovascular system. J Cell Physiol. 2010;226:21–28. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernal J. Thyroid hormone receptors in brain development and function. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:249–259. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bilesimo P, Jolivet P, Alfama G, Buisine N, Le Mevel S, Havis E, Demeneix BA, Sachs LM. Specific histone lysine 4 methylation patterns define TR-binding capacity and differentiate direct T3 responses. Mol Endocrinol. 2011 Jan 14; doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0269. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolliger MF, Frei K, Winterhalter KH, Gloor SM. Identification of a novel neuroligin in humans which binds to PSD-95 and has a widespread expression. Biochem J. 2001;356:581–8. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brambilla F, Santonastaso P, Caregaro L, Favaro A. Disorders of eating behavior: correlation between hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid function and psychopathological aspects. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown RS, Huang SA, Fisher DA. The Maturation of Thyroid Function in the Perinatal Period and During Childhood. In: Braverman LE, Utiger RD, editors. Werner and Ingbar's the Thyroid: a fundamental and clinical text. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2005. pp. 1013–1028. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron DA, Pennimpede T, Petkovich M. Tulp3 is a critical repressor of mouse hedgehog signaling. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:1140–1149. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caria MA, Dratman MB, Kow LM, Mameli O, Pavlides C. Thyroid hormone action: nongenomic modulation of neuronal excitability in the hippocampus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009;21:98–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng SY, Leonard JL, Davis PJ. Molecular aspects of thyroid hormone actions. Endocr Revs. 2010;31:139–70. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cotter JD, Storfer A, Page RB, Beachy CK, Voss SR. Transcriptional response of Mexican axolotls to Ambystoma tigrinum virus (ATV) infection. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Das B, Matsuda H, Fujimoto K, Sun G, Shi YB. Molecular and genetic studies suggest that thyroid hormone receptor is both necessary and sufficient to mediate the developmental effects of thyroid hormone. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;168:174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Das B, Heimeier RA, Buchholz DR, Shi YB. Identification of direct thyroid hormone response genes reveals the earliest gene regulation programs during frog metamorphosis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:34167–34178. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.066084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis PJ, Leonard JL, Davis FB. Mechanisms of nongenomic actions of thyroid hormone. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. De Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl MS, Joels M. Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease. Endocrine Revs. 1998;19:269–301. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.3.0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duval F, Mokrani MC, Lopera FG, Diep TS, Rabia H, Fattah S. Thyroid axis activity and suicidal behavior in depressed patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35:1045–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Furuya F, Lu C, Guigon CJ, Cheng SY. Nongenomic activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling by thyroid hormone receptors. Steroids. 2009;74:628–634. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galton VA. Thyroid hormone receptors and iodothyronine deiodinases in the developing Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1991;85:62–70. doi: 10.1016/0016-6480(92)90172-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gussekloo J, Van Exel G, De Craen AJ, Meinders AE, Frolich M, Westendorp RG. Thyroid status, disability and cognitive function, and survival in old age. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292:2591–2599. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.21.2591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–264. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koibuchi N. The role of thyroid hormone on cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2008;7:530–533. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kong WM, Martin NM, Smith KL, Gardiner JV, Connoley IP, Stephens DA, Dhillo WS, Ghatei MA, Small CJ, Bloom SR. Triiodothyronine stimulates food intake via the hypothalamic ventromedial nucleus independent of changes in energy expenditure. Endocrinology. 2004;145:5252–5258. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krassas GE, Poppe K, Glinoer D. Thyroid function and human reproductive health. Endocr Rev. 2010;31:702–755. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuhn ER, De Groef B, Van der Geyten S, Darras MV. Corticotropin-releasing hormone-mediated metamorphosis in the neotenic axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum: Synergisitic involvement of thyroxine and corticoids on brain type II deiodinase. Gen Comp Endocr. 2005;143:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuhn ER, Jacobs GFM. Metamorphosis. In: Armstrong B, Malacinski GM, editors. Developmental Biology of the Axolotl. Oxford University Press; New York: 1989. pp. 187–194. [Google Scholar]
  26. Leggio L, Ferrulli A, Cardone S, Malandrino N, Mirijello A, D'Angelo C, Vonghia L, Miceli A, Capristo E, Kenna GA, Gasbarrini G, Swift RM, Addolorato G. Relationship between the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and alcohol craving in alcohol-dependent patients: a longitudinal study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:2047–2053. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Monaghan JR, Walker JA, Page RB, Putta S, Beachy CK, Voss SR. Early gene expression during natural spinal cord regeneration in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum. J Neurochem. 2007;101:27–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Monaghan JR, Epp LG, Putta S, Page RB, Walker JA, Beachy CK, Zhu W, Pao GM, Verma IM, Hunter T, Bryant SV, Gardiner DM, Harkins TT, Voss SR. Microarray and cDNA sequence analysis of transcription during nerve dependent limb regeneration. BMC Biology. 2009;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Norman MF, Carr JA, Norris DO. Adenohypophysial-thyroid activity of the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum, as a function of metamorphosis and captivity. J Exp Zool. 1987;242:55–66. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402420108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ooka H, Shinkai T. Effects of hyperthyroidism on the life span of the rat. Mech Aging Dev. 1986;33:275–282. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(86)90052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oppenheimer JH, Schwartz HL, Surks MI. Tissue differences in the concentration of triiodothyronine nuclear binding sites in the rat: liver, kidney, pituitary, heart, brain, spleen, and testis. Endocrinology. 1974;95:897–903. doi: 10.1210/endo-95-3-897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Page RB, Monaghan JR, Samuels AK, Smith JJ, Beachy CK, Voss SR. Microarray analysis identifies keratin loci as sensitive biomarkers for thyroid hormone disruption in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006;145:15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Page RB, Boley MA, Smith JJ, Putta S, Voss SR. Microarray analysis of a salamander hopeful monster reveals transcriptional signatures of paedomorphic brain development. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:199. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Page RB, Voss SR, Samuels AK, Smith JJ, Putta S, Beachy CK. Effect of thyroid hormone concentration on the transcriptional response underlying induced metamorphosis in the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma) BMC Genomics. 2008;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Page RB, Voss SR. Induction of metamorphosis in axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) Cold Spring Harbor Protocols; 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Patel J, Landers K, Li H, Mortimer RH, Richard K. Thyroid hormones and fetal neurological development. Journal of Endocrinology. 2011 Jan 6; doi: 10.1530/JOE-10-0444. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pihlajamäki J, Boes T, Kim EY, Dearie F, Kim BW, Schroeder J, Mun E, Nasser I, Park PJ, Bianco AC, Goldfine AB, Patti ME. Thyroid hormone-related regulation of gene expression in human fatty liver. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:3521–3529. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosenkilde P, Ussing AP. What mechanisms control neoteny and regulate induced metamorphosis in urodeles? Int J Dev Biol. 1996;40:665–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Royland JE, Parker JS, Gilbert ME. A genomic analysis of subclinical hypothyroidism in hippocampus and neocortex of the developing rat brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20:1319–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Samuels HH, Tsai JS, Casanova J. Thyroid hormone action: in vitro demonstration of putative receptors in isolated nuclei and soluble nuclear extracts. Science. 1974;184:1188–1191. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4142.1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanabra C, Mengod G. Neuroanatomical distribution and neurochemical characterization of cells expressing adenylyl cyclase isoforms in mouse and rat brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2011;41:43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sap J, Munoz A, Damm K, Goldberg Y, Ghysdael J, Leutz A, Beug H, Vennstrom B. The c-erb-A protein is a high-affinity receptor for thyroid hormone. Nature. 1986;324:635–640. doi: 10.1038/324635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shaffer HB, Voss SR. Phylogenetic and mechanistic analysis of a developmentally integrated character complex: alternate life history modes in ambystomatid salamanders. Am Zool. 1996;36:24–35. [Google Scholar]
  44. Shi YB. Amphibian Metamorphosis: From Morphology to Molecular Biology. Wiley-Liss Press; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi ZX, Levy A, Lightman SL. Thyroid hormone-mediated regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat. Endocrinology. 1994;134:1577–1580. doi: 10.1210/endo.134.3.8119200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith JJ, Putta S, Walker JA, Kump DK, Samuels AK, Monaghan JR, Weisrock DW, Staben C, Voss SR. Sal-site: integrating new and existing ambystomatid research and informational resources. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tata JR. Gene expression during metamorphosis: an ideal model for post-embryonic development. Bioessays. 1993;15:239–248. doi: 10.1002/bies.950150404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tata JR. Amphibian metamorphosis as a model for the developmental actions of thyroid hormone. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;246:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2005.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, Diemer K, Muruganujan A, Narechania A. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 2003;13:2129–2141. doi: 10.1101/gr.772403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Voss SR, Smith JJ. Evolution of salamander life cycles: a major-effect quantitative trait locus contributes to discrete and continuous variation for metamorphic timing. Genetics. 2005;170:275–281. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.038273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weinberger C, Thompson CC, Ong ES, Lebo R, Gruol DJ, Evans RM. The c-erb-A gene encodes a thyroid hormone receptor. Nature. 1986;324:641–646. doi: 10.1038/324641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wong KK, Ng SY, Lee LT, Ng HK, Chow BK. Orexins and their receptors from fish to mammals: A comparative approach. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;171:134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES