Gene expression differences between stroke-associated and asymptomatic carotid plaques

Abstract

Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis is an important risk factor for stroke. Carotid plaques (CPs) causing stroke may present a distinct type of molecular pathology compared with transient ischemic attack (TIA)-associated or asymptomatic plaques. We compared the gene expression profiles of CPs from stroke patients (n = 12) and asymptomatic patients (n = 9), both with similar risk factors and severity of carotid stenosis (>70%). Sixty probes showed over 1.5-fold expression difference at 5% false discovery rate. Functional clustering showed enrichment of genes in 51 GO categories and seven pathways, the most significant of which relate to extracellular-matrix interaction, PPAR gamma signaling, scavanger receptor activity, and lysosomal activity. Differential expression of ten genes was confirmed in an extended replication group (n = 43), where the most significant expression differences were found in CD36 (2.1-fold change, p = 0.005), CD163 (1.7-fold change, p = 0.007) and FABP4 (2.2-fold change, p = 0.015). These include four genes not previously linked to plaque destabilization: GLUL (2.2-fold change, p = 0.016), FUCA1 (2.2-fold change, p = 0.025), IL1RN (1.6-fold change, p = 0.034), and S100A8 (2.5-fold change, p = 0.047). Strong correlations were found to plaque ulceration, plaque hemorrhage, and markers of apoptosis and proliferation (activated caspase 3, TUNEL, and Ki67). Protein expression of these genes was confirmed by immunohistochemistry and was found in the atheromatous areas of CPs critical for plaque destabilization. This study presents a comprehensive transcriptional analysis of stroke-associated CPs and demonstrates a significant transcriptome difference between stroke-associated and asymptomatic CPs. Follow-up studies on the identified genes are needed to define whether they could be used as biomarkers of symptomatic CPs or have a role in plaque destabilization.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00109-011-0773-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Atherosclerotic disease of the internal carotid artery is a major risk factor of ischemic stroke, and 20% of patients with anterior and middle cerebral artery infarcts have significant carotid stenoses. Curiously, carotid stenoses behave very differently; some progress to occlusion without causing any symptoms, while others manifest themselves with a sudden massive atherothromboembolic cerebral infarction. Previous ipsilateral symptoms and stenosis of 70% or more are established predictive factors of future ipsilateral stroke [1, 2]. Several histological features are also more frequent in symptomatic carotid plaques (CPs), especially fibrous cap thinning, greater inflammatory cell infiltrations, intraplaque hemorrhage, and plaque rupture [3–6]. Both radiologically and histologically detected ulcerations have been shown to associate with symptoms [3, 5, 7]. The detailed molecular mechanisms underlying these plaque features and CP destabilization are incompletely understood.

Several studies have employed large-scale gene expression analysis as a tool to find novel pathophysiologically important genes or signaling pathways that could trigger CP destabilization. Vemuganti and Dempsey conducted a whole genome microarray analysis of CPs from six symptomatic and four asymptomatic patients and reported 289 differentially expressed genes [8], the significance of which, however, is difficult to evaluate because of the lack of adequate statistical tests or replication. In a slightly different approach, Papaspyridonos and colleagues compared unstable and stable plaque regions from three patients and identified a large number of differentially expressed genes in both intra- and inter-individual comparisons [9]. Twenty-seven of these were replicated in an independent set of 46 unstable and stable plaque regions, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), cathepsin B, and legumain further at the protein level. Dahl and colleagues compared expression patterns in four symptomatic and four asymptomatic CPs and found 136 genes with more than twofold expression change, none of which were statistically significant [10]. In subsequent studies in a replication group of 21 CPs, they showed one of these genes, visfatin, to be significantly over-expressed both at the RNA and protein level in symptomatic CPs as well as strong protein expression at the site of plaque rupture in acute coronary syndrome patients. Recently, Agardh et al. compared the expression profiles of CPs from patients with recent symptom (≤1 month; n = 14), patients with longer delay (>1 month; n = 17), and asymptomatic patients (n = 9) and showed the over-expression of fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) in CPs from patients with recent symptoms compared to asymptomatic patients [11]. In addition to FABP4, they report two other genes, IQ motif containing GTPase-activating protein 1 and CD84 antigen, to be upregulated in symptomatic CPs. Also proteomics approaches utilizing a protein array of 512 antibodies [12] and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in connection with mass spectrometry [13] have been used to compare protein expression in stable and unstable carotid plaques. Despite of a number of studies done, some limiting issues impede drawing firm conclusions on the gene expression changes typical of stroke-associated CPs: the very small number of samples in some studies, diverse clinical diagnoses of patients (amaurosis fugax, TIA, or stroke) and the small number of findings reaching statistical significance.

Previously, we have carried out a microarray study on rare cases of bilateral carotid stenosis when searching for intra-individual local factors influencing plaque stability and identified genes involved in the clearance of free tissue hemoglobin, CD163 molecule (CD163), and heme oxygenase-1, to be important [14]. Now we report a larger microarray study of two extreme patient groups with similar conventional risk factors and severity of carotid stenoses but dissimilar clinical plaque behavior to identify inter-individual differences. Due to the inherent inaccuracy in the diagnosis of temporary symptoms such as in TIA and recent findings suggesting that TIA or stroke may represent distinct plaque pathologies [5, 6], we restricted our analysis to stroke-associated carotid plaques (SCPs) from patients with imaging-confirmed recent ipsilateral ischemic brain infarct and asymptomatic carotid plaques (ACPs) from patients without cerebrovascular symptoms and normal brain imaging.

Materials and methods

Patients

The patients were selected from the Helsinki Carotid Endarterectomy Study (HeCES) cohort, which included 92 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy due to high-grade carotid stenoses (>70% [1]) during 1997–2000 in the Helsinki University Central Hospital (methods in detail [15–17]). Recruitment was in-group consecutive, i.e., the recruitment of asymptomatic patients continued 2 months longer to get a more balanced cohort symptom-wise. All patients underwent thorough clinical examination and interview by a stroke neurologist, DSA angiography, transcranial Doppler ultrasound, brain imaging (CT or MRI), routine blood analysis, and analysis of serum lipids and fibrinolytic system. The clinical data was gathered in a HeCES databank together with plaque-level histological and gene expression data. The division into symptomatic or asymptomatic CPs was based on the presence or absence of prior ipsilateral ischemic cerebral or retinal symptoms within 120 days prior to surgery. All human studies were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study protocol was approved by the University of Helsinki ethics committee of ophtalmology, otorhinolaryngology, neurology, and neurosurgery (#339/E9/04).

This microarray study includes CPs only from symptomatic patients with clinical stroke and radiologically confirmed ischemic brain infarction in the ipsilateral carotid territory (n = 12) and asymptomatic patients with no history of ischemic cerebral or retinal symptoms and normal brain imaging (n = 9). In addition, we performed quantitative real-time RT-PCR in an extended group of patients with a clinically defined ischemic stroke or retinal infarct in the ipsilateral carotid territory (n = 25) and clinically asymptomatic patients (n = 18). This group of patients (n = 43) is referred to as the “extended replication group” in the text. There is a significant gender difference between the stroke and asymptomatic patients in both the microarray (p = 0.023) and the extended replication (p = 0.055) groups. Patient characteristics are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and macroscopic plaque features of the analyzed patient groups

	Microarray group				Extended replication group
	All	Symptomatic	Asymptomatic	p valuea	All	Symptomatic	Asymptomatic	p valuea
Number	22	13	9		43	25	18
Gender, M/F	16/6	12/1	4/5	0.023	27/16	19/6	8/10	0.055
Age, yearsb	64 ± 8	62 ± 6	66 ± 9		65 ± 8	65 ± 9	65 ± 7
Degree of ICA stenosesb, c	79 ± 10	82 ± 12	74 ± 5		78 ± 9	79 ± 10	76 ± 7
Cerebrovascular symptom
Stroke, %	59	100	0	<0.001	58	100	0	<0.001
Time from symptom to CEA, daysb		44 ± 32				52 ± 39
Comorbidities, %
Diabetes mellitus, type I or II	23	31	11		28	32	22
Dyslipidemia	68	69	67		58	64	50
Peripheral arterial disease	27	23	33		21	16	28
Coronary heart disease	41	31	56		37	32	44
Current smoking	27	31	22		20	17	24
Arterial hypertension	68	85	44		67	72	61
Medications, %
ASA	55	39	78		62	44	88	0.004
ACE inhibitor	5	8	0		17	16	18
Statin	46	46	44		40	40	39
Anticoagulant	36	54	11		33	52	6	0.035
Laboratory measuresb
Hematocrit	41 ± 3	42 ± 3	40 ± 3		41 ± 4	42 ± 3	39 ± 3	0.005
High-sensitivity CRP	6.5 ± 6.8	5.3 ± 3.4	8.2 ± 9.9		8.7 ± 15.0	6.2 ± 11.6	12.1 ± 18.5
LDL	3.3 ± 1.2	3.8 ± 1.7	3.1 ± 1.0		3.4 ± 1.0	3.6 ± 1.0	3.1 ± 0.8
HDL	1.2 ± 0.2	1.1 ± 0.1	1.4 ± 0.2	0.002	1.3 ± 0.4	1.2 ± 0.3	1.5 ± 0.5	0.048
Fibrinogen	4.0 ± 1.1	4.1 ± 1.1	3.8 ± 1.2		4.7 ± 4.5	5.1 ± 5.8	4.0 ± 1.3
tPA antigen	8.7 ± 3.1	9.5 ± 2.3	7.8 ± 3.7		8.0 ± 3.0	8.6 ± 2.4	7.3 ± 3.5
Macroscopic plaque features, %
Ulceration	30	55	0	0.014	46	60	28	0.035
Intraplaque hemorrhage	53	67	33		55	63	44
Intramural thrombus	19	33	0		18	29	6
Loose atheroma	19	25	11		24	33	11
Calcification	62	50	78		69	63	72

CEA carotid endarterectomy

^a p values shown for significant group differences

^bAge, degree of ICA stenoses, time between symptom and CEA and laboratory measurements are given as mean and standard deviation

^cDegree of internal carotid artery stenoses according to the NASCET criteria

Sample preparation

The CPs were removed en bloc in endarterectomy. The vascular surgeon (ES) inspected CPs after gentle wash of saline, and made macroscopic observations about surface ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, intramural thrombus, loose atheroma, and calcification. The plaques were cut into five longitudinal slices, all containing a portion of atheroma core, each of which were used for a specific purpose: histological examination, RNA and protein extraction, and biochemical analyses. Total RNA was extracted with Trizol®-reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and purified with an RNeasy Total RNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturers' recommendations. RNA quality was assessed using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent Bioanalyser 2100; Agilent Technologies). Details on RNA quality assessment can be found in Supplemental Material.

Microarray analysis and quantitative real-time RT-PCR

The microarray experiments were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the MIAME guidelines [18] using Affymetrix GeneChip® U133A arrays containing 22,283 probe sets. The flowchart of the microarray data analysis is shown in Fig. 1. Detailed description on analysis steps can be found in Supplemental Material.

Fig. 1.

Microarray data analysis flowchart. The number of probe sets remaining after each analysis step is shown. Dashed line arrows to the right indicate probe sets that were used for different clustering analysis. RMA Robust Multi-array Average. Asterisk (*) listed in Supplemental Table 3

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) was performed using TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays and the ABI PRISM®7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Beta-actin was used as the endogenous control gene and relative quantitation was performed using either the comparative delta–delta–Ct or the relative standard curve method. For details see the Supplemental Material and Supplemental Table 1.

Immunohistochemistry and microscopy

Microscopic analyses were performed in adjacent segments of the plaques used for RNA extraction. CPs were assigned to AHA-classes based on microscopic histology [19]. The amounts of macrophages, activated T cells, mast cells, and smooth muscle cells were determined by immunohistochemistry [16]. In addition, the protein products of the following genes were immunostained in the microarray group either in fresh frozen or paraffin-embedded sections using methods previously described [14, 15, 20]: CD36 molecule (CD36), perilipin 2 (PLIN2), FABP4, glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 18 (CCL18), interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN), heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), and S100 calcium binding protein A8 (S100A8; Supplemental Table 2). Light microscopy was performed using Axioplan 2, AxioCam color, and MRGrab 1.0.0.4 respectively (all from Carl Zeiss) by one investigator (KN), who was blinded to the clinical data. For details see Supplemental Material.

Statistics

The statistical analyses, apart from the microarray analyses, were performed using SPSS10.0.7 for Windows (SPSS Inc.). Pearson's chi square or Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the differences in non-continuous variables, and the independent-samples t test was employed for continuous variables. The results from qPCR were evaluated by the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations between real-time qPCR results and clinical data and plaque characteristics were calculated by nonparametric Spearman's Rank Order Correlation Coefficient with Benjamini–Hoechberg multiple testing correction.

Results

Macroscopic and histological characterization of CPs

We first explored macroscopic and histological differences between SCPs and ACPs. There were no differences in macroscopic intraplaque hemorrhages, intramural thrombus, loose atheroma, or calcification. The SCPs had more macroscopic ulcerations (Table 1). On microscopic examination, all CPs represented complicated AHA class VI lesions containing microscopic surface ulceration (VIa), hematoma/hemorrhage (VIb), and/or thrombotic deposit (VIc, see Supplemental Figure 3) [19]. No significant quantitative differences were found in the immunostained area for macrophages, activated T cells, mast cell numbers, or smooth muscle cell staining grades (Supplemental Figures 4 and 5).

Microarray analysis

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of microarray analysis. Firstly, we employed hierarchical clustering of all the CPs and reliably expressed genes (n = 3,433, see Fig. 1) to examine the relationships between CPs. The resulting Condition tree (Fig. 2) shows two main branches, one including ten of the 12 SCPs and the second, six of the nine ACPs. Thus, the global gene expression profiles can classify CPs according to the symptom to asymptomatic and stroke-associated CPs. The classification accuracy remains the same, if clustering is performed for all genes (n = 22,283, see Fig. 1).

Fig. 2.

Hierarchical clustering of CPs (Condition tree). The samples were classified into a tree based on their similarities. The length of the branch between two samples indicates how correlated their expression profiles are. The boxes below represent samples. The characteristics that were unevenly distributed between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups are shown

Ninety-two reliably expressed genes (103 probe sets) showed ≥1.5-fold expression difference between stroke-associated and asymptomatic CPs (Supplemental Table 3). SAM analysis [21] of the 103 probe sets showed that 60 probes sets were significantly differentially expressed at 5% false discovery rate (Table 2). Since microarray analysis was shown to be sensitive to the choice of preprocessing algorithm [22], we analyzed the hybridization data also by two other commonly used algorithms, GC-RMA [23], and MAS5 (http://www.affymetrix.com), followed by comparable filtering steps (see Supplemental Material for details). Based on SAM analysis, 77 and 75 probe sets were significant at 5% FDR in GC-RMA and MAS5 normalized data, respectively. Thirty-seven were shared by all three normalization methods (Supplemental Figure 6).

Table 2.

Microarray probe sets showing statistically significant expression difference between stroke-associated and asymptomatic carotid plaques

Probe ID	Gene symbola	Gene namea	Fold-change	Mann–Whitney U p b	SAM q (%)b
202206_at	ARL4C	ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4 C	1.6	0.001	1.72
213418_at	HSPA6	Heat shock 70 kDa protein 6	1.8	0.001	1.72
221760_at	MAN1A1	Mannosidase, alpha, class 1A, member 1	1.5	0.002	1.72
210512_s_at	VEGFA	Vascular endothelial growth factor A	2.0	0.003	1.72
200921_s_at	BTG1	B-cell translocation gene 1, anti-proliferative	1.6	0.004	1.72
202207_at	ARL4C	ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4C	1.6	0.004	1.72
212192_at	KCTD12	Potassium channel tetramerisation domain containing 12	1.6	0.004	1.72
201670_s_at	MARCKS	Myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C substrate	1.6	0.006	1.72
202998_s_at	LOXL2	Lysyl oxidase-like 2	1.7	0.006	1.72
218149_s_at	ZNF395	Zinc finger protein 395	1.5	0.006	1.72
202499_s_at	SLC2A3	Solute carrier family 2, member 3	1.7	0.009	1.72
205099_s_at	CCR1	Chemokine (C–C motif) receptor 1	1.6	0.009	1.72
212154_at	SDC2	Syndecan 2	1.8	0.009	1.72
217028_at	CXCR4	Chemokine (C–X–C motif) receptor 4	1.8	0.009	1.72
202310_s_at	COL1A1	Collagen, type I, alpha 1	1.7	0.011	1.72
212820_at	DMXL2	DMX-like 2	1.7	0.011	1.72
201438_at	COL6A3	Collagen, type VI, alpha 3	1.7	0.013	1.72
221210_s_at	NPL	N-acetylneuraminate pyruvate lyase	1.8	0.013	1.72
201193_at	IDH1	Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (NADP+), soluble	1.6	0.016	1.72
202934_at	HK2	Hexokinase 2	1.7	0.016	1.72
213655_at	YWHAE	Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase	1.6	0.016	1.72
215049_x_at	CD163	CD163 molecule	1.6	0.016	1.72
217983_s_at	RNASET2	Ribonuclease T2	1.7	0.016	1.72
32128_at	CCL18	Chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 18	2.2	0.016	1.72
203645_s_at	CD163	CD163 molecule	1.7	0.019	1.72
209924_at	CCL18	Chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 18	2.0	0.019	1.72
212671_s_at	HLA-DQA1/HLA-DQA2/LOC650946	Major histocompatibility complex, class II DQ alpha 1	1.8	0.019	1.72
201645_at	TNC	Tenascin C	1.6	0.023	1.72
202838_at	FUCA1	Fucosidase, alpha-L-1	1.9	0.023	1.72
212582_at	OSBPL8	Oxysterol binding protein-like 8	1.6	0.023	1.72
203814_s_at	NQO2	NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinone 2	1.5	0.028	1.72
217202_s_at	GLUL	Glutamate-ammonia ligase	1.7	0.028	1.72
200648_s_at	GLUL	Glutamate-ammonia ligase	1.9	0.033	1.72
202087_s_at	CTSL	Cathepsin L	1.5	0.033	1.72
202436_s_at	CYP1B1	Cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 1	1.6	0.033	1.72
202859_x_at	IL8	Interleukin 8	1.9	0.033	1.72
202902_s_at	CTSS	Cathepsin S	1.5	0.033	1.72
204438_at	MRC1/MRC1L1	Mannose receptor, C type 1	1.6	0.033	1.72
208146_s_at	CPVL	Carboxypeptidase, vitellogenic like	1.5	0.036	1.72
201147_s_at	TIMP3	TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3	1.9	0.039	1.72
202345_s_at	FABP5	Fatty acid-binding protein 5	1.6	0.047	1.72
206488_s_at	CD36	CD36 molecule	2.2	0.047	1.72
219607_s_at	MS4A4A	Membrane-spanning 4-domains, subfamily A, member 4	1.8	0.047	1.72
202912_at	ADM	Adrenomedullin	1.5	0.055	1.72
203665_at	HMOX1	Heme oxygenase 1	2.2	0.055	1.72
203980_at	FABP4	Fatty acid-binding protein 4	2.6	0.055	1.72
212657_s_at	IL1RN	Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist	1.6	0.055	1.72
214038_at	CCL8	Chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 8	1.6	0.055	1.72
215223_s_at	SOD2	Superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial	1.5	0.055	1.72
204580_at	MMP12	Matrix metallopeptidase 12	2.3	0.065	1.72
209122_at	PLIN2	Perilipin 2	1.8	0.065	1.72
217294_s_at	ENO1	Enolase 1	1.7	0.065	1.72
200832_s_at	SCD	Stearoyl-CoA desaturase	1.6	0.076	1.72
209351_at	KRT14	Keratin 14	1.8	0.076	1.72
209555_s_at	CD36	CD36 molecule	1.9	0.076	1.72
201785_at	RNASE1	Ribonuclease, RNase A family, 1	1.5	0.118	3.26
202917_s_at	S100A8	S100 calcium binding protein A8	1.6	0.118	3.26
221730_at	COL5A2	Collagen, type V, alpha 2	1.5	0.136	3.26
203381_s_at	APOE	Apolipoprotein E	1.6	0.177	4.00
204259_at	MMP7	Matrix metallopeptidase 7	1.5	0.201	4.72

^aFor the probe set detecting transcripts from several homologous genes, symbols are separated by hyphen. Gene name is only given for the first one

^b p = pairwise non-adjusted p values from Mann–Whitney U test, q = the minimum false discovery rate at which the gene is called significant from significance analysis of microarrays (SAM)

To identify pathophysiologically important gene groups, we performed gene enrichment analysis on Gene Ontology (GO) categories and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Biocharta pathways for the differentially expressed genes (n = 103, Supplemental Table 3). Fifty-one GO categories showed enrichment with the most significant (p < 0.001) categories: extracellular matrix, extracellular space, lysosome, lytic vacuole, vacuole, fibrillar collagen, collagen, scavenger receptor activity, peptidoglycan metabolism, response to wounding and organ development (categories with ≥3 genes and p < 0.01 are shown in the Supplemental Figure 7 and Supplemental Table 4). Six KEGG and one Biocharta pathway showed more than two differentially expressed genes, and the most significant pathways (p < 0.001, in order of significance) were the extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, PPAR signaling, and antigen processing and presentation pathways (Supplemental Table 5).

Confirmation of differentially expressed genes in the extended replication group

Differential expression of 18 genes discovered in the microarray experiment was tested by qPCR in the same samples and congruent fold change was found for 16 genes (89%, Fig. 3). Next we analyzed these 18 genes in the extended replication group (n = 43), which included CPs from clinically defined stroke patients (n = 25) and asymptomatic patients (n = 18), and qPCR confirmed significant differential expression of ten genes between SCPs and ACPs (Fig. 3). Confirmed expression changes with the most significant association (p < 0.01) with symptoms were CD36 (2.1-fold change, p = 0.005) and CD163 (1.7-fold change, p = 0.007).

Fig. 3.

Confirmation of differential gene expression by qPCR. Genes are organized according to statistical significance (significant bolded). Microarray refers to non-adjusted p values from microarray analysis also given in Table 2 and Supplemental Table 3. QPCR/microarray refers to the real-time qPCR analysis results in the microarray group and qPCR/replication in the extended replication group. All p values from Mann–Whitney U test

Correlations of differentially expressed genes with clinical data and plaque features

We investigated whether the ten genes with confirmed expression changes showed any association with clinical patient characteristics or morphological plaque features (Supplemental Table 6). After multiple testing correction, we did not find significant associations to known atherosclerosis risk factors, comorbidities, medications, or plaque cell-type markers. Instead, several genes showed association to plaque ulceration (seven out of ten genes), intraplaque hemorrhage (four out of ten), and markers of cell death and proliferation (activated caspase 3, four out of ten; Ki67 proliferation marker, four out of ten; TUNEL positivity in the intima, two out of ten). Additionally, three genes showed positive correlation to the degree of ICA stenosis.

Immunohistochemical verification of proteins encoded by differentially expressed genes

The expression and histological localization of nine genes (CD36, CD163, FABP4, PLIN2, GLUL, CCL18, IL1RN, HMOX1, and S100A8) with qPCR-confirmed differential expression in SCPs were investigated at the protein level using immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4). CD36, CD163, FABP4, PLIN2, HMOX1, GLUL, and S100A8 showed expression mainly in macrophages. HMOX1, GLUL, S100A8, and IL1RN were also expressed in other cell types as judged by morphology: HMOX1, GLUL, and IL1RN in smooth muscle cells and S100A8 in scarce intimal polymorphonuclear cells. IL1RN was also expressed in endothelial cells, both in the neovessels as well as in the luminal endothelium. CCL18 showed a diffuse intimal staining pattern typical for secreted chemokines. CD36, CD163, FABP4, PLIN2, S100A8, HMOX1, and GLUL showed strong staining around the lipid core and in atheromatous areas.

Fig. 4.

Immunohistochemical stainings of CD36, CD163, PLIN2, FABP4, GLUL, CCL18, IL1RN, HMOX1, and S100A8. The first column displays images obtained from the edge of an atheroma. The second and the third columns are magnifications from foam cell-rich areas indicated by rectangles

Discussion

The evolution of an atherosclerotic CP into an unstable plaque leading to atherothromboembolic strokes, is still incompletely understood. We adopted large-scale microarray analysis to identify genes and cellular pathways that could relate to plaque destabilization. Microarray analysis was focused on two phenotypic extremes: symptomatic CPs from patients with recent ipsilateral ischemic brain infarct and asymptomatic CPs from patients that have never experienced cerebrovascular symptoms and had normal brain imaging. We demonstrate that stroke-associated CPs possess a characteristic gene expression profile, which distinguishes them from asymptomatic CPs. In addition to confirming several previously recognized genes linked to unstable atherosclerosis, our analysis revealed expression changes in genes with no previously known association with symptomatic or unstable atherosclerotic plaques. Functional clustering data imply intrinsic differences between ACPs and SCPs in cellular processes, including inflammatory responses, intracellular lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and transport, lysosomal activity, and reorganization of the extracellular matrix.

The microarray analysis revealed differential expression with more than 1.5-fold change in 103 probe sets representing 92 genes. SAM analysis of these 103 probe sets found 60 probe sets to be statistically significant at 5% FDR (Fig. 1 and Table 2 ). This represents approximately 0.3% of the probe sets in the original microarray. A small number of differentially expressed genes are expected, since we compare samples that all represent advanced atherosclerotic tissue with no clear histological differences. In addition, we used a stringent filtering criteria and accepted 15% of the microarray probe sets for statistical analysis. The decision on this high filtering cutoff was based on a fact that in a heterogenous tissue such as atherosclerotic plaque, any expression signal measured is a sum of signals from numerous cell populations. Typically, this leads to low fold changes, when only a proportion of cells express a given gene or different cell population show reverse expression changes overriding each others' effect. In this kind of situation, detection of low fold “true” changes from background fluctuation is difficult. Therefore, we chose to concentrate on transcripts whose expression level and difference are high enough to allow for their reliable detection with a goal of finding reproducible list of differentially expressed genes, even if we recognize that this probably increases type II errors.

Eighteen genes were selected for replication by qPCR both in the microarray group and in the extended replication group. Several criteria were used in the selection: statistical significance, consistency across preprocessing methods, functional clustering analysis, and novelty. Replication rate was 89% (16 out of 18 genes) in the microarray group. Only ARL4C and HSPA6 failed to show differential expression by qPCR despite being the two most significant genes in the microarray analysis. Both genes have only one exon, which might cause problems in the correct measurement of single-exon genes by the array's probe design. Findings were similar in the extended replication group: all except ARL4C and HSPA6 showed congruent fold changes in magnitude and direction (Fig. 3). The expression change was statistically significant for ten of the 18 genes (56%). We confirmed protein expression of these genes in the CPs by immunohistochemistry and show that they are expressed in the atheromatous areas of CPs critical for plaque destabilization (Fig. 4).

Many of the identified genes show correlation to plaque features that can be considered markers of CP instability, namely ulceration [5, 7], intraplaque hemorrhage [5], and apoptosis [24] (Supplemental Table 6). In line with the finding of the higher frequency of macroscopic ulcerations in our stroke-associated CPs (see Table 1), the expression of 80% of the qPCR-confirmed genes showed correlation to macroscopic ulcerations. Plaque ulceration is an integral phase in the development of sudden thromboembolism and in this way a morphological correlate of plaque instability [7, 25–27]. It is likely that ulceration affects gene expression patterns and may partly explain them, i.e., through the process of wound healing. However, ulceration and thromboembolism are not “one-time events” but rather the unstable plaques have a chronic course of disease with repeated thromboembolic events. For example, 36% of patients in our extended replication group had TIA within 6 months prior to ischemic stroke and NASCET showed that without CEA the risk of new event stays high several months until it drops gradually within 2 to 3 years to the same annual 3% level as found in asymptomatic patients [1]. It is possible that the recurrent cycles of rupture and healing with the concomitant ulceration of endothelial lining and intraplaque hemorrhages are integral to the instability of symptomatic plaques.

Seven of the qPCR-replicated genes also showed correlation to intraplaque hemorrhages (IPH). In the large meta-analysis of Gao and colleagues [28], incidence of IPH was higher in symptomatic plaques, but the evidence mainly derived from early small-sized studies, whereas recent larger studies yielded insignificant associations. We did not find difference in the incidence of IPH between ACPS and SCPS in our study groups or in the whole HeCES cohort (Table 1) [17]. However, these observations do not exclude the role of IPH in plaque destabilization. In patients with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis, MRI-depicted IPH was associated with future ipsilateral cerebrovascular events [27]. IPH or marked intraplaque vessel formation were also shown to be the only plaque features to predict cardiovascular events after CEA [29]. IPH can destabilize plaques both by ensuing oxidative and inflammatory stress as well as exacerbating the local lipid burden by entailing red blood cell membranes abundant in cholesterol [14, 20, 30, 31]. Our own data suggests that IPH lead to a more-pronounced inflammatory gene induction in symptomatic than in asymptomatic CPs, which could be explained by differences in genetic factors or plaque microenvironment [14]. This kind of phenomenon could explain ambiguous results from previous observational studies.

The results obtained from the present study concur well with the results from our earlier intra-patient expression analysis [14] (15/92 (16%) of the differentially expressed genes) as well as with the results from Papaspyridonos and colleagues comparing unstable and stable plaque regions [9] (33/92 (36%) of the differentially expressed genes). Both matrix metallopeptidase 9 and legumain reported by Papaspyridonos and colleagues [9] are significantly over-expressed in the SCPs of our material. Instead, we do not find increased expression of cathepsin B, but cathepsins D, L, and S. We detect the strong over-expression of FABP4 in the stroke-associated CPs, as was recently reported for symptomatic CPs by two groups [11, 32]. Increased expression of visfatin is not found in our material, but 20 of the genes showing differential expression (although not reaching statistical significance) in the microarray study by Dahl and colleagues [10], were also differentially expressed in our stroke-associated CPs. Converging evidence from these studies accumulates for the important role of several genes in the destabilization of CPs, especially cathepsin L, CD36, fatty acid-binding proteins 4 and 5 (FABP4 and FABP5), heme oxygenase 1, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RN), interleukin 8, matrix metalloproteinases 7 and 12, N-acetylneuraminate pyruvate lyase (NPL), non-muscle myosin 10 (MYH10) and perilipin 2 (PLIN2, previously known as ADFP).

There is a significant difference between the proportion of women in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (Table 1). Skewed gender distribution is an inherent epidemiological phenomenon incorporated in all consecutive series of symptomatic carotid disease [1, 2]. In this study, the gender difference is partly due to the fact that the microarray analysis was restricted to the phenotypic extremes of the disease defined by strict clinical and radiological criteria and hence constituted a subgroup of the larger gender balanced HeCES cohort. To partially compensate for the gender imbalance, genes located in sex chromosomes were excluded from the microarray data analysis. Despite of this imbalance, RNA expression levels of only three of the 18 genes replicated by qPCR showed any correlation to gender (Supplemental Table 6). Also, hierarchical clustering of samples based on global gene expression patterns show that symptom and macroscopic ulcerations are stronger determining factors of gene expression than gender (Fig. 2).

In this study, we report a comprehensive transcriptional analysis of CPs from individuals with clinically relevant carotid disease that links plaque-level gene expression data to thromboembolic strokes. Since the assignment to symptom groups was performed purely from a clinical standpoint, we consider the reported transcriptome to genuinely represent clinical vulnerability of CPs. Perhaps the most striking finding of the present study is that the resulting transcriptome clearly differentiates stroke-associated CPs from asymptomatic CPs at the level of individual patients, corresponding to the clinical course (Fig. 2). Unlike many systemic markers analyzed in our patient material, the plaque-level analysis revealed significant differences related to carotid plaque behavior. This indicates that local expression changes within the plaque might be more crucial in the longstanding development of plaque vulnerability than incidental systemic factors that might have a more transient triggering role in acute plaque destabilization. These results suggest potential new pharmacological targets to be explored for the management, stabilization, or treatment of unstable large artery atherosclerosis.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.