Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2011 Dec;49(12):4311–4313. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00798-11

Actinobaculum Bacteremia: a Report of 12 Cases

Eric Gomez 1, Daniel R Gustafson 2, Jon E Rosenblatt 2, Robin Patel 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3232933  PMID: 21976754

Abstract

Actinobaculum species are anaerobic Gram-positive rods that have previously been associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) in the elderly. We report 12 patients with Actinobaculum bacteremia. Only 40% of blood cultures were clinically considered significant by the treating physicians, but most patients were treated for UTI, suggesting a possible urinary source of bacteremia. Clinicians should be aware of the pathogenic potential of Actinobaculum spp.

TEXT

Actinobaculum is a recently described genus, of which Actinobaculum suis is the type species (7). A. suis is a pathogen in swine, being the most common cause of urinary tract infection (UTI) in these animals (15). Three other species, A. schaalii, A. massiliense, and A. urinale, have been associated with human infection. Recent reports have identified A. schaalii as a cause of UTI in the elderly. However, standard methods for urine culture are inadequate for isolation and identification of Actinobaculum species in urine, so Actinobaculum UTI may be diagnosed only when accompanied by bacteremia (6, 7, 10). There appears to be little awareness among clinicians regarding the pathogenic role of Actinobaculum spp. Therefore, we describe the clinical characteristics of 12 patients from whom Actinobaculum spp. were isolated from blood (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristic of patients with positive blood cultures for Actinobaculum speciesa

Patient Age (yr)/gender Diagnosis Comorbidity(-ies) No. of urine leukocytes/HPF Urine Gram stain result Urine culture result Blood culture (no. of positive sets)b Clinical significance (assessed by treating physicians) Treatment (duration in days)
1 70/Male UTI BPH, prostate CA 100 GPB A. schaalii (2) Yes Ciprofloxacin (3), pip-taz (2), amoxicillin-clavulanate (7)
2 89/Male Urosepsis and pneumonia Dementia, BPH 10 GPB, GPC Aerococcus urinae Aerococcus urinae (3), A. schaalii (2) Yes Pip-taz (14), amoxicillin-clavulanate (14)
3 70/Male Urosepsis BPH, CKD, diabetes 41–50 Not done A. urinale (1) No Vancomycin plus cefepime (2), levofloxacin (7)
4 91/Male Acute cholecystitis Dementia 0 A. schaalii (1) No No antibiotics
5 90/Male Complicated UTI and prostatitis Dementia, BPH 51–100 GPC, GPB Yeast A. schaalii (2), Candida glabrata (1) Yes Penicillin G (5), cefpodoxime (42)
6 84/Male Pneumonia and UTI Dementia, recurrent hematuria 51–100 A. schaalii (1) No Levofloxacin plus metronidazole (14)
7 77/Male Urosepsis Dementia, Parkinson disease, urinary retention 51–100 GNB, GPB Escherichia coli, Enterococcus sp. A. massiliense (1), Escherichia coli (2) No Ciprofloxacin (4), TMP-SMX (17)
8 65/Female Urosepsis s/p ureteral stents Neurogenic bladder with cystectomy/ileal conduit/ureter stent 51–100 Not done A. schaalii (2) Yes Ciprofloxacin (2), pip-taz (4), amoxicillin-clavulanate (14)
9 67/Female UTI Urethral stricture, rheumatoid arthritis Not done GPB A. schaalii (1) No Ciprofloxacin (7)
10 81/Female UTI Lung CA 4–10 GPB Mixed CNS (1), Actinobaculum sp. (1) No Ceftriaxone (4), cephalexin (2)
11 77/Male Perineal necrotizing cellulitis Prostate CA, cystoprostatectomy, and artificial urethral sphincter 4–10 GPB A. schaalii (2) Yes Vancomycin plus metronidazole (21)
12 94/Female UTI CKD, Evan syndrome, resection of bladder CA 41–50 GPB, GNB A. schaalii (1) No Ciprofloxacin (7)
a

Abbreviations: HPF, high-power field; UTI, urinary tract infection; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CA, cancer; pip-taz, piperacillin-tazobactam; −, no growth; GPB, Gram-positive bacilli; GNB, Gram-negative bacilli; GPC, Gram-positive cocci; CNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

b

A blood culture set consisted of two aerobic bottles and an anaerobic bottle.

(This study was presented in part at the 111th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, New Orleans, LA, 21 to 24 May 2011.)

Between November 2004 and May 2010, we identified 12 patients with a positive blood culture for Actinobaculum spp. at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Blood cultures were performed using sets of two Bactec Plus Aerobic/F bottles and one Bactec Lytic Anaerobic/F bottle incubated on the Bactec 9240 system (Becton Dickinson BioSciences, Sparks, MD). Actinobaculum spp. grew only in the anaerobic bottles, which were subcultured to blood agar and CDC anaerobic blood agar plates and incubated in an anaerobic chamber (Coy anaerobic glove box; Ann Arbor, MI) at 35°C. All isolates were identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing using the following primers: 5′-TGGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-TACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC-3′. DNA was prepared for PCR using PrepMan Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and subsequently amplified and sequenced using the BigDye Terminator method. The generated sequences were compared to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed under anaerobic conditions using the Etest (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

For nine patients, growth in blood culture bottles was observed in 2 days; for two patients, growth was observed in 1 day; and for one patient, growth was observed in 3 days. The sequences generated were between 464 and 486 bp. Out of 12 isolates, nine showed 100% identity to A. schaalii, one showed 95% identity to A. schaalii (GenBank accession no. EF151128.1), one showed 99.7% identity to A. urinale (GenBank accession no. NR_028978.1), and one showed 100% identity to A. massiliense (GenBank accession no. AF487679.1). The next closest match to all sequences (88 to 90% sequence identity) was Arcanobacterium abortisuis (GenBank accession no. AB305159.1). The isolate with 95% identity to A. schaalii was reported as Actinobaculum species. All were susceptible to penicillin (MIC, <0.5 μg/ml) and resistant to metronidazole (MIC, >256 μg/ml). Ten were susceptible to clindamycin (MIC, <0.5 μg/ml), and two were clindamycin resistant (cases 2 and 8; MIC, >256 μg/ml).

All patients were older than 65 years, with a mean age of 73 years. Men constituted 66% of patients, and the majority (10/12) had underlying urogenital pathology (benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer, urinary retention, urethral stricture, or urologic instrumentation).

Only 40% of blood cultures (5/12) were considered clinically significant by the treating physicians. This included four complicated UTIs and a case of UTI with perineal necrotizing cellulitis. For seven patients, the treating physicians considered the blood cultures not clinically significant. Six of these had UTIs (cases 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 12), and one had acute cholecystitis (case 4). Five patients (cases 3, 6, 9, 10, and 12) whose positive blood cultures were considered clinically nonsignificant but who were treated for UTI had negative or mixed-flora urine cultures. Four of these five (cases 6, 9, 10, and 12) had urine Gram stains performed, three of which showed many Gram-positive bacilli (cases 9, 10, and 12) and one of which was negative (case 6).

All patients received quinolones as initial antimicrobial therapy. In five patients, quinolones were changed to an antimicrobial regimen directed against Actinobaculum spp. In three patients, quinolones were prescribed to treat UTI. Two patients had clinical resolution of UTI symptoms after treatment, and one had clinical improvement while on treatment with no follow-up data available. One patient was initially treated with ciprofloxacin and changed to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with good clinical response, despite a positive urine culture for Enterococcus sp.

Actinobaculum spp. are nonsporulating, nonmotile, Gram-positive rods related to the Arcanobacterium and Actinomyces species. Actinobaculum spp. are anaerobes or facultative anaerobes that can grow on blood agar at 37°C in 5% CO2 (7). Four species are currently described, A. schaalii, A. massiliense, A. urinale, and A. suis, the last being the type strain.

A. suis has been isolated from sows with cystitis (14). Interestingly, multiple case reports have associated A. schaalii with UTI in humans (68, 11). Despite the description of this bacterium as a cause of UTI, its isolation from urine is not routine in most clinical laboratories because it requires an anaerobic or CO2 environment and prolonged incubation (≥48 h) to grow (9). In addition, there are no standard methods for its identification, so molecular techniques are typically needed. Our laboratory does not routinely isolate A. schaalii from urine. Although seven blood cultures were clinically considered of questionable significance because only one set of blood cultures (of several performed) was positive, six of these patients were diagnosed and treated for UTIs, raising the possibility that many were actually significant bacteremias, associated with Actinobaculum UTI.

In a recent study of patients with Actinobaculum infection, all patients with positive urine cultures had pyuria, negative nitrates, and Gram-positive bacilli on urine Gram stain (2). The authors suggest that in patients with these findings and underlying urogenital pathology, Actinobaculum spp. should be screened for in the urine by prolonged incubation in 5% CO2. Nielsen et al. showed that A. schaalii is isolated from the urine of 0.6% of the elderly with UTI (9). Using a real-time PCR, Bank et al. detected A. schaalii in 22% of 155 urine specimens of elderly patients (1). A. schaalii was also, however, detected in asymptomatic patients (up to 13%) by PCR, so (as with other uropathogens) its detection has to be correlated with clinical symptoms (1).

A. massiliense and A. urinale have been recently described in association with UTI (5) and septicemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (4), respectively. Besides UTI, other infections have been reported with Actinobaculum spp., including skin and soft tissue infection and vertebral osteomyelitis (6, 13). We present herein a case of perineal necrotizing cellulitis caused by A. schaalii in a 77-year-old man (case 11). Multiple tissue cultures and two sets of blood cultures grew A. schaalii. A. schaalii has been reported as a cause of Fournier's gangrene (12).

A. schaalii has been reported as being susceptible to penicillin and resistant to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, both of which are antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of UTIs (2, 10). All of our isolates (including the A. urinale and A. massiliense isolates) were penicillin susceptible. Ciprofloxacin was not tested. Three patients with A. schaalii and one with A. urinale were treated with a fluoroquinolone with good response. Patient 8 received ciprofloxacin prophylaxis prior to ureteral stent exchange and developed A. schaalii sepsis postoperatively. Of note, 5 months before the procedure, a urinalysis had shown many Gram-positive bacilli and cocci. Although quinolone susceptibility was not reported on this isolate, failure of prophylaxis may have related to lack of activity against A. schaalii. A recent study reporting in vitro susceptibility testing in 48 isolates of A. schaalii showed that all were resistant to ciprofloxacin but that 90 and 96% were susceptible to levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively (3).

In this series, most patients with positive blood cultures for Actinobaculum spp. had concomitant UTIs, which we suspect (but cannot prove) were the likely source of the bacteremia. However, in the majority, the bloodstream isolate was considered by the treating clinician to be of questionable significance, possibly due to lack of knowledge of the recently recognized significance of Actinobaculum spp. New laboratory methods and techniques are needed for identification of Actinobaculum spp. in the urine to institute appropriate early antimicrobial therapy and prevent complications, including bacteremia.

Acknowledgments

We thank the outstanding staff of the Mayo Clinic Bacteriology Laboratory.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 5 October 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bank S., Jensen A., Hansen T. M., Soby K. M., Prag J. 2010. Actinobaculum schaalii, a common uropathogen in elderly patients, Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:76–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Beguelin C., et al. 2011. Actinobaculum schaalii: clinical observation of 20 cases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17:1027–1031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cattoir V., et al. 2010. In vitro susceptibility of Actinobaculum schaalii to 12 antimicrobial agents and molecular analysis of fluoroquinolone resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:2514–2517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fendukly F., Osterman B. 2005. Isolation of Actinobaculum schaalii and Actinobaculum urinale from a patient with chronic renal failure. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3567–3569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Greub G., Raoult D. 2002. “Actinobaculum massiliae,” a new species causing chronic urinary tract infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3938–3941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Haller P., et al. 2007. Vertebral osteomyelitis caused by Actinobaculum schaalii: a difficult-to-diagnose and potentially invasive uropathogen. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 26:667–670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lawson P. A., Falsen E., Akervall E., Vandamme P., Collins M. D. 1997. Characterization of some Actinomyces-like isolates from human clinical specimens: reclassification of Actinomyces suis (Soltys and Spratling) as Actinobaculum suis comb. nov. and description of Actinobaculum schaalii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:899–903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Martinaud C., et al. 2008. Actinobaculum schaali bacteremia in an aged male patient. Med. Mal. Infect. 38:617–619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nielsen H. L., Soby K. M., Christensen J. J., Prag J. 2010. Actinobaculum schaalii: a common cause of urinary tract infection in the elderly population. Bacteriological and clinical characteristics. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 42:43–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Reinhard M., et al. 2005. Ten cases of Actinobaculum schaalii infection: clinical relevance, bacterial identification, and antibiotic susceptibility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5305–5308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sturm P. D., Van Eijk J., Veltman S., Meuleman E., Schulin T. 2006. Urosepsis with Actinobaculum schaalii and Aerococcus urinae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:652–654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Vanden Bempt I., et al. 2011. Actinobaculum schaalii causing Fournier's gangrene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:2369–2371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Waghorn D. J. 2004. Actinobaculum massiliae: a new cause of superficial skin infection. J. Infect. 48:276–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Walker R. L., MacLachlan N. J. 1989. Isolation of Eubacterium suis from sows with cystitis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 195:1104–1107 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Woldemeskel M., Drommer W., Wendt M. 2002. Microscopic and ultrastructural lesions of the ureter and renal pelvis in sows with regard to Actinobaculum suis infection. J. Vet. Med. A 49:348–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES