Abstract
Several highly conserved genes play a role in anterior neural plate patterning of vertebrates and in head and brain patterning of insects. However, head involution in Drosophila has impeded a systematic identification of genes required for insect head formation. Therefore, we use the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum in order to comprehensively test the function of orthologs of vertebrate neural plate patterning genes for a function in insect head development. RNAi analysis reveals that most of these genes are indeed required for insect head capsule patterning, and we also identified several genes that had not been implicated in this process before. Furthermore, we show that Tc-six3/optix acts upstream of Tc-wingless, Tc-orthodenticle1, and Tc-eyeless to control anterior median development. Finally, we demonstrate that Tc-six3/optix is the first gene known to be required for the embryonic formation of the central complex, a midline-spanning brain part connected to the neuroendocrine pars intercerebralis. These functions are very likely conserved among bilaterians since vertebrate six3 is required for neuroendocrine and median brain development with certain mutations leading to holoprosencephaly.
Author Summary
All bilaterian animals evolved from one common ancestor. Previous gene function analyses have revealed that several genes play a role in the patterning of anterior regions in all bilaterian animals, suggesting similar mechanisms underlying anterior nervous system formation in humans and the patterning of the insect head and brain. In order to identify novel genes required for anterior development in insects, we have systematically tested genes known to be crucially involved in early nervous system development in vertebrates (e.g. mice and humans) for their activity in the head of the red flour beetle Tribolium casteneum. Indeed, all but one of these genes are required for head development. Intriguingly, we find that six3 is required for anterior median brain structures in insects just as it is in vertebrates, where six3 mutations lead to holoprosencephaly.
Introduction
The insect head is composed of several fused segments, the number of which remains disputed (e.g. [1]–[6]). The posterior labial, maxillary and mandibular segments are patterned by the well-studied trunk segmentation cascade. In contrast, the patterning of the procephalic region (intercalary, antennal, ocular segments and anterior non-segmental region) is less well understood. It has been suggested in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster that the head gap-like genes orthodenticle (otd), empty-spiracles (ems), buttonhead (btd) and sloppy-paired (slp) activate segment polarity genes directly or via second order regulators [7]–[9] but an instructive role could not be confirmed for btd and ems [10], [11]. Moreover, the segment polarity interactions of head segments differ from those in the trunk. For example, hedgehog (hh) expression in the intercalary segment is driven by its own unique enhancer element [12], [13] (see [4] and [6] for further details).
However, the development of the larval head of Drosophila is highly derived. During late stages of embryogenesis, the head gets turned outside into the thorax (head involution) and consequently cuticular head structures are highly reduced [14]–[16]. Also the emergence of the everted adult head from imaginal discs is derived within insects [17], [18]. These morphological differences correlate with changes in embryonic pattern formation. Comparisons with other insects have revealed that the upstream levels of head formation differ profoundly (e.g. no bicoid in most insects [19], no torso signaling in head development [20], different input of decapentaplegic (dpp) on head development [21]) while some degree of conservation is found on lower levels like the head gap like genes, second order regulators and segment polarity genes ([4] and references therein). Notably, the head expression of wingless (wg) appears to be reduced in Drosophila correlating with its derived head development. Hence, the evolution of the Drosophila head involved both structural changes and alterations of the gene regulatory network [4], [6], [14], [22].
Intriguingly, orthologs of several genes required for Drosophila head patterning play a role in vertebrate neural plate patterning (e.g. otd/otx, ems/emx, slp/bf1, tailless(tll)/tlx). These data indicated that anterior patterning in insects and vertebrates relies on a strongly overlapping gene set [2], [7], [8], [13], [23]–[36]. Indeed, additional similarities between vertebrate and insect head and brain patterning have subsequently been revealed (e.g. [37]–[47]). Furthermore, an urbilaterian origin of anterior brain patterning has also been supported by similar data in an annelid [48]–[52].
The red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum has recently been established as a model for insect head development because it has an insect typical non-involuted head developing from a ventral-posterior region of the blastoderm, reflecting the ancestral situation (reviewed in [4], [53]). Several orthologs of Drosophila head patterning genes have been studied in Tribolium revealing differences with respect to the head gap-like genes [54] and knirps [55] but also a number of similarities with respect to second order regulators [56], [57]. Furthermore, genes required for vertebrate placode development were found to be active at similar locations in the Tribolium embryonic head [44].
Tc-six3 is a member of the six type homeobox gene family, which has three members in insects [58] while two paralogs of each family are found in mouse (six3/six6, six1/2 and six4/5). It is required for the formation of the labrum, an appendage of the non-segmental part of the head [3]. The Drosophila ortholog, called optix, is required for eye development [59]–[61], and for maxillary and clypeolabral structures of the larval head [62]. However, genetic interactions of this gene in the context of head development have not been analyzed in insects so far. Suggestively, the vertebrate six3 gene is essential for eye development [63]–[70] and anterior neural plate patterning [71]–[75]. Furthermore, vertebrate six3 and its paralog six6 are involved in the development of the neuroendocrine pituitary and hypothalamus [76]–[80]. As the six3 expression domain is anterior to the otd domain in arthropods, annelids and vertebrates, it is likely that this was also a feature of the last common ancestor of bilaterian animals [81].
In order to identify novel insect head patterning genes and with the high degree of conservation in mind, we comprehensively tested Tribolium orthologs of vertebrate neural plate patterning genes for a function in the insect head. Indeed, we find that many of them are required for head development. Closer examination of Tc- six3 reveals that it acts upstream of Tc-wingless (Tc-wg), Tc-otd and Tc-eyeless (Tc-ey) in anterior median head patterning. Further, we find that Tc-six3 is required for median brain development with a specific role in central body formation.
Results
18 out of 24 Vertebrate Neural Plate Patterning Genes Are Expressed in the Tribolium Head
From the literature we identified 24 genes involved in early vertebrate neural plate patterning (see Table S1) [32], [33], [41], [45], [74], [80], [82]–[127]. Three genes do not possess orthologs in either the Tribolium or Drosophila genome (Dmbx1/Atx, Vax1, Hesx1/Rpx; see phylogenetic trees in Figure S1). Tc-FGF8 does not cluster unequivocally with mouse FGF8 but with the Drosophila Pyramus and Thisbe proteins which have previously been identified as FGF8 orthologs [128], [129]. Of the 21 orthologs, Tc-BarH, Tc-Wnt11 and Tc-munster/arx are not expressed in the head anlagen (not shown), while the remaining 18 genes are active in the embryonic head. For these genes, we determined the expression pattern at several stages (determined by Tc-wg counter stain) in order to reveal their dynamics during head development. Genes that had not been described before in Tribolium are shown in Figure 1. In order to produce a comprehensive dataset with comparable staging, we also included previously described genes (Figures S2 and S3) (Tc-otd [130], Tc-ems [54], Tc-tailless (Tc-tll) [131], Tc-six3 [3], Tc-hedgehog (Tc-hh) [132], [133], Tc-cubitus-interruptus (Tc-ci) [132], Tc-wg [134], Tc-fgf8 [128], Tc-sloppy paired (Tc-slp) [135], Tc-eyeless (Tc-ey) [136], Tc-ptx [44], Tc-irx [137]).
Interestingly, a number of these genes are expressed in the head but not segmentally reiterated in the trunk (Tc-otd, Tc-six3, Tc-tll, Tc-lim1, Tc-gsc, Tc-scro, Tc-rx, Tc-fez1) supporting the notion that the anterior patterning system differs from the one of the trunk. However, other genes do have segmentally reiterated expression in addition to anterior expression (Tc-hh, Tc-wg, Tc-ci, Tc-irx/mirr, Tc-fgf8, Tc-slp, Tc-ems, Tc-ey, Tc-dbx, Tc-ptx), linking these two systems.
All Genes But One Are Involved in Head Epidermis Patterning
The embryonic preantennal region gives rise to the lateral and dorsal head capsule (compare white area anterior to the dark grey shaded antennal segment in a flattened germband in Figure 2D with a non-flattened embryo depicted in E) [4], [44]. This region is marked by an invariant bristle pattern in the first instar larval cuticle [54] (see Figure 2F for most prominent bristles and Figure S4 for more details), which allows the localization of cuticle defects, which arose in pre-antennal tissues. Unfortunately, previously published RNAi phenotypes had not been scored for the head bristle pattern except for Tc-otd and Tc-ems [54] and Tc-ey/toy, where a small subset of three setae was scored [136]. Therefore, we performed RNAi for all novel genes as well for those where the head capsule defects had not been described previously. We excluded Tc-hh and Tc-wg because RNAi for these genes induces severe generalized embryonic defects, which impede the analysis of the bristle pattern (data not shown and [132], [138]).
Tc-ci RNAi interfered with segmentation of the entire embryo as described [132]. Head defects ranged from the total loss of the head (9.1%, n = 11) to the loss and malformation of gnathal segments (90.9%; Figure 3C). Where accessible, the head bristle pattern was analyzed, revealing mainly a disruption of the vertex setae marking the dorsal tissue (Figure 3C′; the numbers for this and other bristle pattern defects are given in Table S2, the names of the setae and bristles are given in Figure S4). Knock down of the pair rule gene Tc-slp resulted in a pair rule phenotype [135] (70%, n = 10; Figure 3D). We found additional head defects in the median part of the vertex, the bell row and the maxilla escort bristles (Figure 3D′). Tc-six3 knock down leads to loss of the labrum and clypeolabral parts of the anterior head capsule [3], [62] (100%, n = 16; Figure 3E). In line with the loss of anterior median cuticle, the anterior vertex seta and the anterior vertex bristle were missing (Figure 3E′), while the median part of the dorsal head cuticle often displayed an irregular pattern of additional bristles and setae. Tc-ey and Tc-toy have been shown to act synergistically in eye formation, while the respective analysis on the head bristle pattern was restricted to 3 bristles [136]. Re-analysis of single and double RNAi revealed more extensive defects than previously described (Figure 3F, 3F′). In comparison with single RNAi experiments, double RNAi revealed a 1,4- to 6-fold increase of penetrance of bristle pattern defects using the same final concentration of dsRNA (Table S2) confirming that the two Tribolium pax6 orthologs also act synergistically in epidermis development. The head of Tc-lim1/5 RNAi larvae was compacted and shortened (16.7%, n = 12; Figure 3G). Head appendages were present but mostly malformed (41.7%). The anterior and median maxilla escort bristles failed to form (Figure 3G′), while in 20.8% no bell row was observed (Figure 3G′). In Tc-scro RNAi larvae the labrum failed to fuse either completely (60%; n = 15) (black arrowheads in Figure 3H) or partially (13.3%; not shown). The bristle pattern remained largely unaltered except for the anterior vertex bristle (Figure 3H′). Interestingly, the labrum quartet bristles were present even on unfused labra. In Tc-rx knock down larvae, the labrum was narrower than in wild type leading to a widened space between the labrum and the antennae (25%, n = 8; arrow in Figure 3I) and the adjacent clypeus bristles of the labrum quartet were lost in more than half of the analyzed RNAi larvae (Figure 3I′). Additionally, the antenna basis bristle and the median maxilla escort seta were sensitive to Tc-rx knock down (Figure 3I′).
RNAi against the remaining genes did not elicit large deletions but alterations of the head bristle pattern (Figure 4 and Table S2). Lateral defects were found after RNAi against Tc-dbx, Tc-ey single RNAi and Tc-gsc (Figure 4A–4C). Tc-ptx and Tc-irx led to dorsal defects (Figure 4D, 4E) while the bristle defects of Tc-toy, Tc-fez and Tc-tll were more widespread (Figure 4F–4H). No bristles were missing in Tc-fgf8 RNAi (n = 29), although lethality of most larvae and a bent flagellum phenotype of the antenna in 41.5% (n = 53, not shown) confirmed the RNAi effect. In summary, we showed that all vertebrate neural plate patterning genes investigated here (except for Tc-fgf8) are indeed involved in anterior head epidermis patterning in Tribolium. By and large, the cuticle defects correspond well with the location of the expression domain, but we also find some indication for indirect defects (see red circles in Figure 3 and Figure 4 and discussion for details).
Tc-six3 Is a Repressor of Tc-wg and Tc-otd1
Considering its early expression and severe RNAi phenotype, Tc-six3 was likely to play a central role in insect head patterning. Therefore, we centered our subsequent analysis on the epidermal and neural function of this gene. We tested the effect of Tc-six3 RNAi on genes that-based on our expression and RNAi data-were likely to interact. Indeed, the protocerebral neuroectodermal expression domain of Tc-wg (pne) [133] (also called the ocular Tc-wg domain or the head blob in Drosophila [2], [133]) expanded medially and anteriorly in early elongating RNAi embryos (black arrowheads in Figure 5B), resulting in massive median misexpression in fully elongated germbands (Figure 5D). The lateral aspects of Tc-wg expression appeared largely unchanged (open arrows in Figure 5C–5D). Moreover, loss of median embryonic tissue was apparent (white outline in Figure 5C–5D) including the stomodeum (see also Figure 5U) and labrum anlagen (white and black stars in Figure 5C, respectively). As a consequence, the head lobes were not bent outwards and the antennal Tc-wg stripes became perpendicular to the body axis instead of being twisted outwards as in wildtype (compare arrows in Figure 5D with 5C; see Figure S5L–S50 for phenotypes of more advanced stages where the assignment of the antennal stripe becomes obvious). The expression of Tc-otd1 was strongly expanded towards anterior and median tissue (compare Figure 5F, 5H with Figure 5E, 5G) while the lateral aspects appeared normal (open arrowheads in Figure 5G–5H). Despite being partially coexpressed (Tc-tll and Tc-scro) or expressed adjacent to the Tc-six3 domain (Tc-rx), the expression domains of these genes remained unchanged after Tc- six3 RNAi (not shown).
Early Ocular Tc-ey/Pax6 Is Repressed by Tc-six3 While More Anterior Expression Domains Require Tc-six3 Function
The effect of Tc-six3 RNAi was different with respect to the various domains of Tc-ey (Figure 5I–5N). Tc-ey expression starts in a prominent ocular domain (open arrowheads in Figure S3 H2–3) before an additional anterior median expression arises (black arrowheads in Figure 5I, 5K, 5M and Figure S3 H4–5). We found coexpression of Tc-dachshund with parts of the anterior median domain (white arrowheads in Figure S5C–S5C″), making it possible that it marks mushroom body anlagen as in Drosophila [139], [140]. In Tc-six3 RNAi embryos, the early ocular domain was strongly expanded towards the midline (compare Figure 5J with Figure 5I). Later, a domain remained visible at the midline (black star in Figure 5N). The anterior median domain did not develop in Tc-six3 RNAi embryos (Figure 5J, 5L, 5N). Again, the lateral aspects of the ocular domain as well as the segmental domains appeared unaffected.
Tc-six3 Is Essential for the Expression of Neuroendocrine Marker Genes
six3 has been implicated in neuroendocrine development in vertebrates [80] and protostomes [81]; and in Drosophila, it is coexpressed with the neuroendocrine markers fas2 and chx [81], [141]. The functional relevance of this co-expression remained unknown. We confirmed co-expression in Tribolium (Figure S5D–S5G, S5H–S5K) and found that in Tc-six3 RNAi embryos the anterior median domains of Tc-fas2 and Tc-chx were absent (compare domains marked by black arrowheads in Figure 5O, 5Q to Figure 5P, 5R).
Tc-six3 Is Required for Development of the Central Body and the Median Brain
In insects, epidermal and neural precursor cells are intermingled in the neuroectoderm. The neural stem cells receive spatial patterning cues before they delaminate from the neuroectoderm and contribute to the central nervous system in a cell autonomous way. The remaining epidermal cells eventually secrete the cuticle [142], [143]. This explains why mutations in segment polarity genes elicit both cuticular and CNS defects. With this in mind, it was likely that Tc-six3 knock down would induce brain defects. First, we determined that eight Tc-ase marked neuroblasts are found within the Tc-six3 marked neuroectoderm until 24 hours of development (extended germband stage, white stars and arrows in Figure 6A). Later, in 42–48 hour old embryos, Tc-six3 is expressed in the developing brain lateral and anterior to the stomodeum (Figure 6C, stomodeum marked by black asterisk). Additionally, staining is evident in the overlaying dorsal epidermis (Figure 6B), the stomodeal roof (Figure 6D) and the labrum (Figure 6E).
In order to test the hypothesis of a neural function of Tc-six3, we generated transgenic imaging lines marking neural cells, glia and mushroom bodies (Koniszewski, Kollmann, Averof, in preparation) and we identified the central body at the L1 larval stage (white arrow in Figure 6F). Indeed, Tc-six3 RNAi at low doses led to the loss of the central body in an otherwise normal brain (Figure 6G). Higher doses additionally reduced the distance between the two brain hemispheres (Figure 6H). In weak phenotypes the orientation of the median lobes of the mushroom bodies towards the midline was lost (compare white arrowheads in Figure 6J with Figure 6I) while in strong phenotypes, upon convergence of the brain hemispheres, the mushroom bodies approached each other and were reduced in size (see black arrow in Figure 6K).
In the light of the Tc-six3 expression profile, these brain defects could be due to an early neuroectodermal function of Tc-six3 (see neuroectodermal expression in Figure S2B) or to a later function in developing neural cells (see expression in the brain in Figure 6B–6E). In the first case, epidermal and neural phenotypes would be elicited at the same time and, hence, be tightly linked. In the second case, knockdown at late embryonic stages (when epidermal patterning is already finished) would lead to the induction of neural phenotypes in otherwise unaffected heads. To test this, we injected 1 ug/ul Tc-six3 dsRNA in embryos at 0–2, 4–6, 6–8, 12–14 and 18–20 hours post egg laying and scored the resulting L1 larvae for both cuticle and brain phenotypes (Figure 6L). Indeed, the severity of neural and epidermal phenotypes correlated strongly and we never observed brain phenotypes in embryos without cuticle defects. This indicates that both cuticle and brain phenotype are outcomes of the same early neuroectodermal patterning events.
Discussion
Identification of Novel Insect Head Patterning Genes
With our candidate gene approach we identified five genes that had not been implicated in insect head epidermis patterning before (goosecoid, scarecrow, fez1, dbx, ptx). For four additional genes, we show involvement in embryonic head capsule development while a role in adult Drosophila head patterning had been described previously (ci, Drx, lim1, mirror) [144]–[147]. Based on our fate map, the cuticle defects generally correspond well with the head expression of the respective gene. However, the bell row and the setae of the maxilla escort appear to be sensitive to indirect effects because they were affected in several RNAi experiments with genes, which-based on our fatemap-do not show expression in the respective regions (red circles in Figure 3 Tc-lim1/5, Tc-ptx, Tc-irx and Figure 4 Tc-six3, Tc-rx, Tc-fez). Both regions are located where the head lobes are predicted to fuse either with gnathal segments (maxilla escort) or the trunk (bell row; see black stars in Figure 2C). Hence, primary defects of a gene knockdown in head lobe morphology or size could lead to the observed secondary defects.
A Novel Regulator of Central Complex Formation
We show that Tc-six3 is required for proper formation of the central body, which is a midline spanning neuropile and part of the central complex. To our knowledge, this is the first gene known to be required for embryonic central complex development. Our data are in line with cell lineage tracing experiments in grasshopper embryos, where neuroblasts at a corresponding anterior median position contribute to the central complex [148]. Further, expression of optix/six3 in corresponding neuroblasts was also shown in Drosophila [81]. Together, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that Tc-six3 is required in the neuroectoderm for specifying the identity of central body neuroblasts. However, tools to genetically trace the offspring of these neuroblasts [149] are needed to prove this link.
In hemimetabolous insects, which represent the ancestral mode of embryogenesis, all neuropils of the central complex are formed during embryogenesis. In Drosophila, in contrast, the central complex develops during late larval stages [150]–[153]. Tribolium takes an intermediate position by forming a subset of central complex neuropils during embryogenesis, a situation apparently conserved with another tenebrionid beetle [154]. With the newly available brain imaging lines and its amenability to functional genomics Tribolium is an excellent model to investigate the genetics of embryonic central complex development.
Anterior-Median Development in Insects
We showed that Tc-six3 is expressed in an anterior median domain from earliest stages on and that it acts as an upstream component of anterior median patterning. Drosophila optix/six3 is expressed in an anterior blastodermal ring anterior to otd, which persists at the dorsal side [58], [70], [81] and is required for labral and maxillary structures [62]. Its ring like expression does not support an involvement in median patterning but relevant genetic interactions remain to be studied. The later expression in the labrum and in bilateral dorsal domains, however, is similar in both species.
Interestingly, aspects of dorsal median head patterning are controlled by dpp in Drosophila. Shortly before gastrulation, the action of dpp and its downstream target zen at the dorsal midline separate the neuroectoderm into paired anlagen by medial repression of genes and by promoting median cell death. This results in the establishment of bilateral expression of marker genes of the respective brain parts (e.g. Dchx (pars intercerebralis); Fas2 and Drx (pars lateralis); sine oculis and eyes-absent (visual system)) [46], [141], [155], [156]. Actually, many other anterior patterning genes initiate their expression as unpaired domains across the dorsal midline that are subsequently medially subdivided in Drosophila (e.g. otd [157], tll [158], fezf [159], Dsix4 [58]). In contrast, the Tribolium orthologs of most of these genes are initiated as separate bilateral domains (Tc-rx and Tc-fez (Figure 1E and 1D), Tc-chx and Tc-Fas2 (Figure S5), Tc-tll [131]), Tc-six4 [44], Tc-sine oculis, Tc-eyes-absent [160]). Tc-otd1 starts out with ubiquitous expression related to axis formation [130], [161], [162] but then resolves into paired head lobe domains which are separate as with the aforementioned genes.
Due to differences in topology of the head anlagen (see below), median repression of anterior patterning genes by Tc-dpp is not required in Tribolium. Nevertheless, it is expressed along the rim of the head anlagen at blastoderm stages, some parts of which will become the site of dorsal fusion [163], [164]. However, Tc-Dpp activity (detected by antibodies against pMad) does not occur at the site of expression and is clearly distant from the arising Tc-rx, Tc-chx, Tc-six4, Tc-sine oculis or Tc-fas2 domains [21]. Also the Tc-dpp RNAi phenotypes differ from Drosophila mutants in that the head anlagen are expanded and appear to have lost their dorso-ventral orientation (shown by expansion of Tc-otd1 and the proneural gene Tc-ASH) in an overall ventralized embryo [21]. Hence, the early expression of dpp at the future dorsal midline might be ancestral, but its function with respect to medially repressing gene expression has probably evolved in Drosophila.
Tribolium Probably Reflects the More Ancestral Situation
The difference in generation of paired dorsal domains in these two insect species reflects the different location of the head anlagen. In the long germ insect Drosophila, extraembryonic tissues are reduced to the dorsally located amnioserosa while the head anlagen are situated in the anterior dorsal blastoderm from earliest stages on [165], [166]. Consequently, the head lobes are never separated along the midline. In contrast, in the short germ insect Tribolium, the anterior blastoderm gives rise to extraembryonic amnion and serosa, which eventually ensheath the embryo [166]. In contrast to Drosophila, the Tribolium head anlagen are located in the ventral median blastoderm from where they move towards anteriorly and bend dorsally. The head lobes are separate from the beginning but fuse at late stages at the dorsal midline forming the dorsal head (bend and zipper model, see Figure 2A–2C and [4], [137] for more details). During these morphogenetic movements, the initially separate expression domains of the head lobes eventually come into close proximity at the dorsal midline like in Drosophila (Figure 2D–2F). Both the anterior dorsal location of extraembryonic tissue anlagen and the ventral location of the head anlagen are found in most insects [166] and in the hemimetabolous milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, gene expression data show a clear separated origin of the head lobes in the blastoderm [167]. Hence, Tribolium is likely to represent the ancestral state in insects.
In striking analogy to Drosophila, the expressions of vertebrate eye field patterning genes start out as one midline spanning domain (e.g. Rx and Pax6 [65], [168], [169]). Later, these domains split medially, which is the prerequisite for the formation of bilateral eye anlagen. shh as well as six3 are involved in medial repression of Pax6 and Rx2 [65], [169] with six3 acting upstream of shh [170]. This appears to be more similar to the derived Drosophila situation than to the ancestral split of head lobe anlagen (see above). However, the molecules involved in median split are different (dpp in Drosophila versus six3 and shh in vertebrates) and we find involvement of Tribolium six3 but not dpp in median patterning. Hence, the molecular data actually suggest a higher degree of conservation between Tribolium and vertebrates and convergent evolution of the similarity between Drosophila and vertebrates.
Conserved Function of six3 in Neuroendocrine and Anterior Median Patterning of Bilaterians
Regarding the likely difference to Drosophila, it is striking that the role of vertebrate six3 in median separation of anterior expression domains is similar to what we find in Tribolium. In vertebrates, six3 represses midbrain derived Wnt signaling [72], [73], which we also find in Tribolium. In vertebrates, six3 and its paralog six6 are involved in pituitary and hypothalamus development [76]–[80]. Based on its expression, six3 has been predicted to contribute to neuroendocrine brain parts in annelids and Drosophila [81]. More generally, the similarity of bilaterian neuroendocrine systems and their common origin from placode like precursors have been noted [44], [47], [171]. Here, we have added functional data showing that Tc-six3 is indeed required for the expression of neuroendocrine markers for the pars intercerebralis (Tc-chx) and pars lateralis (Tc-fas2) [141] placing it high in the hierarchy of neuroendocrine development in bilaterians.
In mouse embryos with reduced levels of six3 and shh expression, median head and brain structures are affected (e.g. median nasal prominence) or absent (e.g. nasal septum, the septum, corpus callosum)(see Figure 5X) [170]. Such holoprosencephaly phenotypes are also seen in some human six3 mutations [172]. Very similarly, we see loss of median brain structures in Tribolium after RNAi for Tc-six3 Overall, these similarities functionally confirm that the ancestral role of six3 orthologs was in the anterior median patterning of the Urbilateria (Figure 5V–5X) [81].
Materials and Methods
Animals
Most experiments were performed using the wild type Tribolium castaneum strain San Bernardino. For brain imaging, a transgenic line for 6XP3-ECFP (marking glia) and elongation factor1-alpha regulatory region-DsRedEx (EF1-B; marking neural cells) and the enhancer trap line Gö-11410 (marking mushroom bodies with EGFP; identified in the GEKU screen [173]) were used (Koniszewski, Kollmann, Averof, in preparation).
Identification of Candidate Genes in Tribolium
Mouse protein sequences of the candidate genes (see Table S1) were obtained from the NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Tribolium orthologs were identified by BLAST at the Beetle Base server (beetlebase.org/). Test of orthology: Tribolium sequences were blasted against the NCBI protein database and the top 5–15 hits from insects, vertebrate and selected other groups were retrieved, as well as the three most similar Tribolium genes. These were BLASTed against the entire NCBI nucleotide database and the first three hits were retrieved. All these sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm of Mega 4 [174],[175]. Phylogenetic trees were calculated in Mega 4 using the Neighbor-Joining method [176] (bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 10.000 replicates [177]; evolutionary distances computed using the Poisson correction method [178]; all positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated from the dataset (complete deletion option)). See Figure S1 for phylogenetic trees. Phylogenetic relationships for the following genes were already published: Tc-wnt11 and Tc-wg/wnt1 [179], Tc-otd1/otx and Tc-ems/emx [54], Tc-ey/pax6 and Tc-toy/pax6 [136], Tc-eya [160].
Cloning of Candidate Genes
mRNA of 0–48 h embryos was isolated using the MicroPoly(A)Purist Kit (Ambion) and cDNA was synthesized by using the SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (ClonTech). Gene fragments obtained by PCR with gene specific primers (see Table S3) were cloned into the pCRII vector using the TA Cloning Dual Promotor Kit (Invitrogen) and their sequence was confirmed.
Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization
Single (NBT/BCIP) and double in situ stainings (NBT/BCIP & FastRed or INT/BCIP) were performed and documented as described [180], [181].
Knock Down of Gene Function by RNA Interference (RNAi)
RNAi was performed by injection of dsRNA into pupae (pRNAi), adults (aRNAi) or embryos (eRNAi) as described [182]–[184]. Lengths of gene fragments and mode of injection are listed in Table S1. Concentrations used in pupal RNAi and adult RNAi: 2–4 µg/µl; in embryonic RNAi: 1–2 µg/µl. A negative control for pupal RNAi was performed by pricking pupae with the needle or injecting water, injection buffer or dsRNA against tGFP. These controls did not show significant developmental effects in the offspring (not shown). In order to identify potential off-target regions, sequences were BLASTed against the Tribolium genome (BLASTn) at Beetle Base. For five genes, sequence similarity of 21 or more successive identical nucleotides was found to hit other gene predictions. For those, RNAi analysis was repeated by another person using subfragments that did not contain the potentially off-target sequences. The phenotypic effects were very similar with respect to the cuticle phenotype (not shown) and the head bristle pattern (Table S2). See Table S3 for primers for the subfragments. Because Tc-six3 was investigated in more detail, two non-overlapping fragments were cloned, injected and analyzed separately by another person. Staining of Tc-six3 in Tc-six3 RNAi embryos confirmed strongly reduced or imperceptible expression in knock down embryos. The cuticle phenotype (not shown) and the head bristle pattern (Table S2) was very similar, confirming specificity.
Epifluorescent and Confocal Imaging
Image stacks of cleared first instar cuticles were gathered by using a Zeiss LSM 510 or a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope and projections were calculated as described previously [44], [181]. Brain imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 510.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Markus Friedrich (Tc-toy, Tc-ey), Reinhard Schröder (Tc-tll), and Evgenia Ntini (Tc-hh) for clones; Katrin Kanbach for technical assistance; Julia Ulrich for off-target control analyses; Johannes Schinko for providing Tc-otd and Tc-ems stainings; and Michalis Averof for the neural imaging line. Stefan Dippl, Martin Kollmann, and Joachim Schachtner helped with the interpretation of the brain morphology. This work profited from discussions with Frank Nieber, Dr. Kris Henningfeld, and Prof. Ernst A. Wimmer and the helpful comments of three anonymous reviewers.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) research center Center of Molecular Brain Physiology (CMPB) and the DFG grant BU-1443/2 to GB (www.dfg.de). NP was supported by stipends from the Göttingen Graduate School of Neuroscience and Molecular Bioscience (GGNB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Schmidt-Ott U, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Jackle H, Technau GM. Number, identity, and sequence of the Drosophila head segments as revealed by neural elements and their deletion patterns in mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:8363–8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schmidt-Ott U, Technau GM. Expression of en and wg in the embryonic head and brain of Drosophila indicates a refolded band of seven segment remnants. Development. 1992;116:111–125. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Posnien N, Bashasab F, Bucher G. The insect upper lip (labrum) is a nonsegmental appendage-like structure. Evol Dev. 2009;11:479–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Posnien N, Schinko JB, Kittelmann S, Bucher G. Genetics, development and composition of the insect head - A beetle's view. Arthropod Struct Dev E pub ahead of print. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scholtz G, Edgecombe GD. The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence. Dev Genes Evol. 2006;216:395–415. doi: 10.1007/s00427-006-0085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rogers BT, Kaufman TC. Structure of the insect head in ontogeny and phylogeny: a view from Drosophila. Int Rev Cytol. 1997;174:1–84. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cohen SM, Jurgens G. Mediation of Drosophila head development by gap-like segmentation genes. Nature. 1990;346:482–485. doi: 10.1038/346482a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grossniklaus U, Pearson RK, Gehring WJ. The Drosophila sloppy paired locus encodes two proteins involved in segmentation that show homology to mammalian transcription factors. Genes Dev. 1992;6:1030–1051. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crozatier M, Valle D, Dubois L, Ibnsouda S, Vincent A. Collier, a novel regulator of Drosophila head development, is expressed in a single mitotic domain. Curr Biol. 1996;6:707–718. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(09)00452-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schock F, Reischl J, Wimmer E, Taubert H, Purnell BA, et al. Phenotypic suppression of empty spiracles is prevented by buttonhead. Nature. 2000;405:351–354. doi: 10.1038/35012620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wimmer EA, Cohen SM, Jackle H, Desplan C. buttonhead does not contribute to a combinatorial code proposed for Drosophila head development. Development. 1997;124:1509–1517. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.8.1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ntini E, Wimmer EA. Unique establishment of procephalic head segments is supported by the identification of cis-regulatory elements driving segment-specific segment polarity gene expression in Drosophila. Dev Genes Evol. 2011;221:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00427-011-0354-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gallitano-Mendel A, Finkelstein R. Novel segment polarity gene interactions during embryonic head development in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1997;192:599–613. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Snodgrass RE. Principles of Insect Morphology. New York: McGRaw Hill; 1935. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Campos-Ortega JA, Hartenstein V. The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Turner FR, Mahowald AP. Scanning electron microscopy of Drosophila melanogaster embryogenesis. III. Formation of the head and caudal segments. Dev Biol. 1979;68:96–109. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(79)90246-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Snodgrass RE. The metamorphosis of a fly's head. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. 1953;122:1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Snodgrass RE. Insect Metamorphosis. 1954. Washington.
- 19.Stauber M, Jackle H, Schmidt-Ott U. The anterior determinant bicoid of Drosophila is a derived Hox class 3 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3786–3789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schoppmeier M, Schröder R. Maternal torso signaling controls body axis elongation in a short germ insect. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2131–2136. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van der Zee M, Stockhammer O, von Levetzow C, Nunes da Fonseca R, Roth S. Sog/Chordin is required for ventral-to-dorsal Dpp/BMP transport and head formation in a short germ insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16307–16312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605154103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cohen S, Jurgens G. Drosophila headlines. Trends Genet. 1991;7:267–272. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90327-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grossniklaus U, Cadigan KM, Gehring WJ. Three maternal coordinate systems cooperate in the patterning of the Drosophila head. Development. 1994;120:3155–3171. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.11.3155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strecker TR, Kongsuwan K, Lengyel JA, Merriam JR. The zygotic mutant tailless affects the anterior and posterior ectodermal regions of the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol. 1986;113:64–76. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90108-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mohler J. Spatial regulation of segment polarity gene expression in the anterior terminal region of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Mech Dev. 1995;50:151–161. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)00332-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Younossi-Hartenstein A, Green P, Liaw GJ, Rudolph K, Lengyel J, et al. Control of early neurogenesis of the Drosophila brain by the head gap genes tll, otd, ems, and btd. Dev Biol. 1997;182:270–283. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simeone A, Acampora D, Gulisano M, Stornaiuolo A, Boncinelli E. Nested expression domains of four homeobox genes in developing rostral brain. Nature. 1992;358:687–690. doi: 10.1038/358687a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Simeone A, Gulisano M, Acampora D, Stornaiuolo A, Rambaldi M, et al. Two vertebrate homeobox genes related to the Drosophila empty spiracles gene are expressed in the embryonic cerebral cortex. Embo J. 1992;11:2541–2550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05319.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Leuzinger S, Hirth F, Gerlich D, Acampora D, Simeone A, et al. Equivalence of the fly orthodenticle gene and the human OTX genes in embryonic brain development of Drosophila. Development. 1998;125:1703–1710. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.9.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hirth F, Reichert H. Conserved genetic programs in insect and mammalian brain development. Bioessays. 1999;21:677–684. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199908)21:8<677::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Holland P, Ingham P, Krauss S. Development and evolution. Mice and flies head to head. Nature. 1992;358:627–628. doi: 10.1038/358627a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yu RT, McKeown M, Evans RM, Umesono K. Relationship between Drosophila gap gene tailless and a vertebrate nuclear receptor Tlx. Nature. 1994;370:375–379. doi: 10.1038/370375a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Monaghan AP, Grau E, Bock D, Schutz G. The mouse homolog of the orphan nuclear receptor tailless is expressed in the developing forebrain. Development. 1995;121:839–853. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.3.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Acampora D, Avantaggiato V, Tuorto F, Barone P, Reichert H, et al. Murine Otx1 and Drosophila otd genes share conserved genetic functions required in invertebrate and vertebrate brain development. Development. 1998;125:1691–1702. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.9.1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hirth F, Kammermeier L, Frei E, Walldorf U, Noll M, et al. An urbilaterian origin of the tripartite brain: developmental genetic insights from Drosophila. Development. 2003;130:2365–2373. doi: 10.1242/dev.00438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reichert H. A tripartite organization of the urbilaterian brain: developmental genetic evidence from Drosophila. Brain Res Bull. 2005;66:491–494. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.De Velasco B, Shen J, Go S, Hartenstein V. Embryonic development of the Drosophila corpus cardiacum, a neuroendocrine gland with similarity to the vertebrate pituitary, is controlled by sine oculis and glass. Dev Biol. 2004;274:280–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Erclik T, Hartenstein V, Lipshitz HD, McInnes RR. Conserved role of the Vsx genes supports a monophyletic origin for bilaterian visual systems. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1278–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Eggert T, Hauck B, Hildebrandt N, Gehring WJ, Walldorf U. Isolation of a Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate homeobox gene Rx and its possible role in brain and eye development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:2343–2348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Davis RJ, Shen W, Heanue TA, Mardon G. Mouse Dach, a homologue of Drosophila dachshund, is expressed in the developing retina, brain and limbs. Dev Genes Evol. 1999;209:526–536. doi: 10.1007/s004270050285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Glavic A, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Modolell J, Mayor R. Xiro, a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Iroquois complex genes, controls development at the neural plate. Embo J. 1998;17:181–190. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Goriely A, Stella M, Coffinier C, Kessler D, Mailhos C, et al. A functional homologue of goosecoid in Drosophila. Development. 1996;122:1641–1650. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.5.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Urbach R. A procephalic territory in Drosophila exhibiting similarities and dissimilarities compared to the vertebrate midbrain/hindbrain boundary region. Neural Develop. 2007;2:23. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-2-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Posnien N, Koniszewski N, Bucher G. Insect Tc-six4 marks a unit with similarity to vertebrate placodes. Dev Biol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cavodeassi F, Modolell J, Gomez-Skarmeta JL. The Iroquois family of genes: from body building to neural patterning. Development. 2001;128:2847–2855. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.15.2847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hartenstein V, Reh TA. Homologies between vertebrate and invertebrate eyes. In: Moses K, editor. Drosophila eye development. Berlin Heidelberg Springer-Verlag; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hartenstein V. The neuroendocrine system of invertebrates: a developmental and evolutionary perspective. J Endocrinol. 2006;190:555–570. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tomer R, Denes AS, Tessmar-Raible K, Arendt D. Profiling by image registration reveals common origin of annelid mushroom bodies and vertebrate pallium. Cell. 2010;142:800–809. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Denes AS, Jekely G, Steinmetz PR, Raible F, Snyman H, et al. Molecular architecture of annelid nerve cord supports common origin of nervous system centralization in bilateria. Cell. 2007;129:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Arendt D. Genes and homology in nervous system evolution: comparing gene functions, expression patterns, and cell type molecular fingerprints. Theory Biosci. 2005;124:185–197. doi: 10.1007/BF02814483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tessmar-Raible K, Raible F, Christodoulou F, Guy K, Rembold M, et al. Conserved sensory-neurosecretory cell types in annelid and fish forebrain: insights into hypothalamus evolution. Cell. 2007;129:1389–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Arendt D, Denes AS, Jekely G, Tessmar-Raible K. The evolution of nervous system centralization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:1523–1528. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bucher G, Wimmer EA. Beetle a-head. BIF Futura. 2005;20:164–169. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schinko JB, Kreuzer N, Offen N, Posnien N, Wimmer EA, et al. Divergent functions of orthodenticle, empty spiracles and buttonhead in early head patterning of the beetle Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera). Dev Biol. 2008;317:600–613. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cerny AC, Grossmann D, Bucher G, Klingler M. The Tribolium ortholog of knirps and knirps-related is crucial for head segmentation but plays a minor role during abdominal patterning. Dev Biol. 2008;321:284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schaeper ND, Pechmann M, Damen WG, Prpic NM, Wimmer EA. Evolutionary plasticity of collier function in head development of diverse arthropods. Dev Biol. 2010;344:363–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Economou AD, Telford MJ. Comparative gene expression in the heads of Drosophila melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum and the segmental affinity of the Drosophila hypopharyngeal lobes. Evol Dev. 2009;11:88–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Seo HC, Curtiss J, Mlodzik M, Fjose A. Six class homeobox genes in drosophila belong to three distinct families and are involved in head development. Mech Dev. 1999;83:127–139. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cheyette BN, Green PJ, Martin K, Garren H, Hartenstein V, et al. The Drosophila sine oculis locus encodes a homeodomain-containing protein required for the development of the entire visual system. Neuron. 1994;12:977–996. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90308-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Serikaku MA, O'Tousa JE. sine oculis is a homeobox gene required for Drosophila visual system development. Genetics. 1994;138:1137–1150. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pignoni F, Hu B, Zavitz KH, Xiao J, Garrity PA, et al. The eye-specification proteins So and Eya form a complex and regulate multiple steps in Drosophila eye development. Cell. 1997;91:881–891. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80480-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Coiffier D, Charroux B, Kerridge S. Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila. Development. 2008;135:291–300. doi: 10.1242/dev.009662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Liu W, Lagutin O, Swindell E, Jamrich M, Oliver G. Neuroretina specification in mouse embryos requires Six3-mediated suppression of Wnt8b in the anterior neural plate. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3568–3577. doi: 10.1172/JCI43219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Del Bene F, Tessmar-Raible K, Wittbrodt J. Direct interaction of geminin and Six3 in eye development. Nature. 2004;427:745–749. doi: 10.1038/nature02292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Carl M, Loosli F, Wittbrodt J. Six3 inactivation reveals its essential role for the formation and patterning of the vertebrate eye. Development. 2002;129:4057–4063. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.17.4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Goudreau G, Petrou P, Reneker LW, Graw J, Loster J, et al. Mutually regulated expression of Pax6 and Six3 and its implications for the Pax6 haploinsufficient lens phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8719–8724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132195699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lagutin O, Zhu CC, Furuta Y, Rowitch DH, McMahon AP, et al. Six3 promotes the formation of ectopic optic vesicle-like structures in mouse embryos. Dev Dyn. 2001;221:342–349. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Loosli F, Winkler S, Wittbrodt J. Six3 overexpression initiates the formation of ectopic retina. Genes Dev. 1999;13:649–654. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.6.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Toy J, Yang JM, Leppert GS, Sundin OH. The optx2 homeobox gene is expressed in early precursors of the eye and activates retina-specific genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:10643–10648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Seimiya M, Gehring WJ. The Drosophila homeobox gene optix is capable of inducing ectopic eyes by an eyeless-independent mechanism. Development. 2000;127:1879–1886. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.9.1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gestri G, Carl M, Appolloni I, Wilson SW, Barsacchi G, et al. Six3 functions in anterior neural plate specification by promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting Bmp4 expression. Development. 2005;132:2401–2413. doi: 10.1242/dev.01814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lagutin OV, Zhu CC, Kobayashi D, Topczewski J, Shimamura K, et al. Six3 repression of Wnt signaling in the anterior neuroectoderm is essential for vertebrate forebrain development. Genes Dev. 2003;17:368–379. doi: 10.1101/gad.1059403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lavado A, Lagutin OV, Oliver G. Six3 inactivation causes progressive caudalization and aberrant patterning of the mammalian diencephalon. Development. 2008;135:441–450. doi: 10.1242/dev.010082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Loosli F, Koster RW, Carl M, Krone A, Wittbrodt J. Six3, a medaka homologue of the Drosophila homeobox gene sine oculis is expressed in the anterior embryonic shield and the developing eye. Mech Dev. 1998;74:159–164. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kobayashi M, Toyama R, Takeda H, Dawid IB, Kawakami K. Overexpression of the forebrain-specific homeobox gene six3 induces rostral forebrain enlargement in zebrafish. Development. 1998;125:2973–2982. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.15.2973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gaston-Massuet C, Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Sajedi E, Bird S, et al. Genetic interaction between the homeobox transcription factors HESX1 and SIX3 is required for normal pituitary development. Dev Biol. 2008;324:322–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jean D, Bernier G, Gruss P. Six6 (Optx2) is a novel murine Six3-related homeobox gene that demarcates the presumptive pituitary/hypothalamic axis and the ventral optic stalk. Mech Dev. 1999;84:31–40. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ghanbari H, Seo HC, Fjose A, Brandli AW. Molecular cloning and embryonic expression of Xenopus Six homeobox genes. Mech Dev. 2001;101:271–277. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00572-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gallardo ME, Lopez-Rios J, Fernaud-Espinosa I, Granadino B, Sanz R, et al. Genomic cloning and characterization of the human homeobox gene SIX6 reveals a cluster of SIX genes in chromosome 14 and associates SIX6 hemizygosity with bilateral anophthalmia and pituitary anomalies. Genomics. 1999;61:82–91. doi: 10.1006/geno.1999.5916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Oliver G, Mailhos A, Wehr R, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, et al. Six3, a murine homologue of the sine oculis gene, demarcates the most anterior border of the developing neural plate and is expressed during eye development. Development. 1995;121:4045–4055. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.12.4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Steinmetz PR, Urbach R, Posnien N, Eriksson J, Kostyuchenko RP, et al. Six3 demarcates the anterior-most developing brain region in bilaterian animals. Evodevo. 2010;1:14. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Boncinelli E, Gulisano M, Broccoli V. Emx and Otx homeobox genes in the developing mouse brain. J Neurobiol. 1993;24:1356–1366. doi: 10.1002/neu.480241008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rubenstein JL, Shimamura K, Martinez S, Puelles L. Regionalization of the prosencephalic neural plate. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:445–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Rubenstein JLR, Shimamura K. Regulation of patterning and differentiation in the embryonic vertebrate forebrain. In: Cowan WM, Jessell TM, Zipursky SL, editors. Molecular and Cellular Approaches to Neural Development. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997. pp. 356–390. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Takahashi M, Osumi N. Expression study of cadherin7 and cadherin20 in the embryonic and adult rat central nervous system. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hollemann T, Bellefroid E, Pieler T. The Xenopus homologue of the Drosophila gene tailless has a function in early eye development. Development. 1998;125:2425–2432. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.13.2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kitambi SS, Hauptmann G. The zebrafish orphan nuclear receptor genes nr2e1 and nr2e3 are expressed in developing eye and forebrain. Gene Expr Patterns. 2007;7:521–528. doi: 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sheng HZ, Bertuzzi S, Chiang C, Shawlot W, Taira M, et al. Expression of murine Lhx5 suggests a role in specifying the forebrain. Dev Dyn. 1997;208:266–277. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199702)208:2<266::AID-AJA13>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Camus A, Davidson BP, Billiards S, Khoo P, Rivera-Perez JA, et al. The morphogenetic role of midline mesendoderm and ectoderm in the development of the forebrain and the midbrain of the mouse embryo. Development. 2000;127:1799–1813. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.9.1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lemaire L, Roeser T, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Kessel M. Segregating expression domains of two goosecoid genes during the transition from gastrulation to neurulation in chick embryos. Development. 1997;124:1443–1452. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.8.1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chuang JC, Mathers PH, Raymond PA. Expression of three Rx homeobox genes in embryonic and adult zebrafish. Mech Dev. 1999;84:195–198. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Deschet K, Bourrat F, Ristoratore F, Chourrout D, Joly JS. Expression of the medaka (Oryzias latipes) Ol-Rx3 paired-like gene in two diencephalic derivatives, the eye and the hypothalamus. Mech Dev. 1999;83:179–182. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00037-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mathers PH, Grinberg A, Mahon KA, Jamrich M. The Rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature. 1997;387:603–607. doi: 10.1038/42475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Meijlink F, Beverdam A, Brouwer A, Oosterveen TC, Berge DT. Vertebrate aristaless-related genes. Int J Dev Biol. 1999;43:651–663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hashimoto H, Yabe T, Hirata T, Shimizu T, Bae Y, et al. Expression of the zinc finger gene fez-like in zebrafish forebrain. Mech Dev. 2000;97:191–195. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hirata T, Nakazawa M, Muraoka O, Nakayama R, Suda Y, et al. Zinc-finger genes Fez and Fez-like function in the establishment of diencephalon subdivisions. Development. 2006;133:3993–4004. doi: 10.1242/dev.02585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hirata T, Suda Y, Nakao K, Narimatsu M, Hirano T, et al. Zinc finger gene fez-like functions in the formation of subplate neurons and thalamocortical axons. Dev Dyn. 2004;230:546–556. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Jeong JY, Einhorn Z, Mathur P, Chen L, Lee S, et al. Patterning the zebrafish diencephalon by the conserved zinc-finger protein Fezl. Development. 2007;134:127–136. doi: 10.1242/dev.02705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Matsuo I, Suda Y, Yoshida M, Ueki T, Kimura C, et al. Otx and Emx functions in patterning of the vertebrate rostral head. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1997;62:545–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.McMahon AP, Joyner AL, Bradley A, McMahon JA. The midbrain-hindbrain phenotype of Wnt-1-/Wnt-1- mice results from stepwise deletion of engrailed-expressing cells by 9.5 days postcoitum. Cell. 1992;69:581–595. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90222-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Aoto K, Nishimura T, Eto K, Motoyama J. Mouse GLI3 regulates Fgf8 expression and apoptosis in the developing neural tube, face, and limb bud. Dev Biol. 2002;251:320–332. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Hebert JM, Fishell G. The genetics of early telencephalon patterning: some assembly required. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 doi: 10.1038/nrn2463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Glavic A, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Mayor R. The homeoprotein Xiro1 is required for midbrain-hindbrain boundary formation. Development. 2002;129:1609–1621. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.7.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Scholpp S, Lohs C, Brand M. Engrailed and Fgf8 act synergistically to maintain the boundary between diencephalon and mesencephalon. Development. 2003;130:4881–4893. doi: 10.1242/dev.00683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Shimamura K, Rubenstein JL. Inductive interactions direct early regionalization of the mouse forebrain. Development. 1997;124:2709–2718. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.14.2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Fjose A, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Fromental-Ramain C, Duboule D. Expression of the zebrafish gene hlx-1 in the prechordal plate and during CNS development. Development. 1994;120:71–81. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Lu S, Bogarad LD, Murtha MT, Ruddle FH. Expression pattern of a murine homeobox gene, Dbx, displays extreme spatial restriction in embryonic forebrain and spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:8053–8057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Gershon AA, Rudnick J, Kalam L, Zimmerman K. The homeodomain-containing gene Xdbx inhibits neuronal differentiation in the developing embryo. Development. 2000;127:2945–2954. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.13.2945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lu S, Wise TL, Ruddle FH. Mouse homeobox gene Dbx: sequence, gene structure and expression pattern during mid-gestation. Mech Dev. 1994;47:187–195. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Shoji H, Ito T, Wakamatsu Y, Hayasaka N, Ohsaki K, et al. Regionalized expression of the Dbx family homeobox genes in the embryonic CNS of the mouse. Mech Dev. 1996;56:25–39. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00509-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Dickinson A, Sive H. Positioning the extreme anterior in Xenopus: cement gland, primary mouth and anterior pituitary. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:525–533. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dutta S, Dietrich JE, Aspock G, Burdine RD, Schier A, et al. pitx3 defines an equivalence domain for lens and anterior pituitary placode. Development. 2005;132:1579–1590. doi: 10.1242/dev.01723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Schweickert A, Steinbeisser H, Blum M. Differential gene expression of Xenopus Pitx1, Pitx2b and Pitx2c during cement gland, stomodeum and pituitary development. Mech Dev. 2001;107:191–194. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00461-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Zilinski CA, Shah R, Lane ME, Jamrich M. Modulation of zebrafish pitx3 expression in the primordia of the pituitary, lens, olfactory epithelium and cranial ganglia by hedgehog and nodal signaling. Genesis. 2005;41:33–40. doi: 10.1002/gene.20094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Crossley PH, Martin GR. The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development. 1995;121:439–451. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.2.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Colombo E, Galli R, Cossu G, Gecz J, Broccoli V. Mouse orthologue of ARX, a gene mutated in several X-linked forms of mental retardation and epilepsy, is a marker of adult neural stem cells and forebrain GABAergic neurons. Dev Dyn. 2004;231:631–639. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.El-Hodiri HM, Qi XL, Seufert DW. The Xenopus arx gene is expressed in the developing rostral forebrain. Dev Genes Evol. 2003;212:608–612. doi: 10.1007/s00427-002-0282-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Friocourt G, Poirier K, Rakic S, Parnavelas JG, Chelly J. The role of ARX in cortical development. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:869–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04629.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Seufert DW, Prescott NL, El-Hodiri HM. Xenopus aristaless-related homeobox (xARX) gene product functions as both a transcriptional activator and repressor in forebrain development. Dev Dyn. 2005;232:313–324. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Cavodeassi F, Carreira-Barbosa F, Young RM, Concha ML, Allende ML, et al. Early stages of zebrafish eye formation require the coordinated activity of Wnt11, Fz5, and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Neuron. 2005;47:43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Broccoli V, Colombo E, Cossu G. Dmbx1 is a paired-box containing gene specifically expressed in the caudal most brain structures. Mech Dev. 2002;114:219–223. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00078-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gogoi RN, Schubert FR, Martinez-Barbera JP, Acampora D, Simeone A, et al. The paired-type homeobox gene Dmbx1 marks the midbrain and pretectum. Mech Dev. 2002;114:213–217. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00067-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hallonet M, Hollemann T, Wehr R, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, et al. Vax1 is a novel homeobox-containing gene expressed in the developing anterior ventral forebrain. Development. 1998;125:2599–2610. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.14.2599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Jones FS, Kioussi C, Copertino DW, Kallunki P, Holst BD, et al. Barx2, a new homeobox gene of the Bar class, is expressed in neural and craniofacial structures during development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:2632–2637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kawahara A, Chien CB, Dawid IB. The homeobox gene mbx is involved in eye and tectum development. Dev Biol. 2002;248:107–117. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Martynova N, Eroshkin F, Ermakova G, Bayramov A, Gray J, et al. Patterning the forebrain: FoxA4a/Pintallavis and Xvent2 determine the posterior limit of Xanf1 expression in the neural plate. Development. 2004;131:2329–2338. doi: 10.1242/dev.01133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Thomas P, Beddington R. Anterior primitive endoderm may be responsible for patterning the anterior neural plate in the mouse embryo. Curr Biol. 1996;6:1487–1496. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(96)00753-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Beermann A, Schroder R. Sites of Fgf signalling and perception during embryogenesis of the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:153–167. doi: 10.1007/s00427-007-0192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Stathopoulos A, Tam B, Ronshaugen M, Frasch M, Levine M. pyramus and thisbe: FGF genes that pattern the mesoderm of Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 2004;18:687–699. doi: 10.1101/gad.1166404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Li Y, Brown SJ, Hausdorf B, Tautz D, Denell RE, et al. Two orthodenticle-related genes in the short germ beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol. 1996;206:35–45. doi: 10.1007/s004270050028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Schröder R, Eckert C, Wolff C, Tautz D. Conserved and divergent aspects of terminal patterning in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6591–6596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100005497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Farzana L, Brown SJ. Hedgehog signaling pathway function conserved in Tribolium segmentation. Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:181–192. doi: 10.1007/s00427-008-0207-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Liu Z, Yang X, Dong Y, Friedrich M. Tracking down the “head blob”: comparative analysis of wingless expression in the developing insect procephalon reveals progressive reduction of embryonic visual system patterning in higher insects. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2006;35:341–356. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Nagy LM, Carroll S. Conservation of wingless patterning functions in the short-germ embryos of Tribolium castaneum. Nature. 1994;367:460–463. doi: 10.1038/367460a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Choe CP, Brown SJ. Evolutionary flexibility of pair-rule patterning revealed by functional analysis of secondary pair-rule genes, paired and sloppy-paired in the short-germ insect, Tribolium castaneum. Dev Biol. 2007;302:281–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yang X, Weber M, Zarinkamar N, Posnien N, Friedrich F, et al. Probing the Drosophila retinal determination gene network in Tribolium (II): The Pax6 genes eyeless and twin of eyeless. Dev Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Posnien N, Bucher G. Formation of the insect head involves lateral contribution of the intercalary segment, which depends on Tc-labial function. Dev Biol. 2010;338:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Bolognesi R, Farzana L, Fischer TD, Brown SJ. Multiple Wnt genes are required for segmentation in the short-germ embryo of Tribolium castaneum. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1624–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Noveen A, Daniel A, Hartenstein V. Early development of the Drosophila mushroom body: the roles of eyeless and dachshund. Development. 2000;127:3475–3488. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.16.3475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kurusu M, Nagao T, Walldorf U, Flister S, Gehring WJ, et al. Genetic control of development of the mushroom bodies, the associative learning centers in the Drosophila brain, by the eyeless, twin of eyeless, and Dachshund genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040564497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.de Velasco B, Erclik T, Shy D, Sclafani J, Lipshitz H, et al. Specification and development of the pars intercerebralis and pars lateralis, neuroendocrine command centers in the Drosophila brain. Dev Biol. 2007;302:309–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Technau GM, Berger C, Urbach R. Generation of cell diversity and segmental pattern in the embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:861–869. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Skeath JB, Thor S. Genetic control of Drosophila nerve cord development. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:8–15. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Amin A, Li Y, Finkelstein R. Hedgehog activates the EGF receptor pathway during Drosophila head development. Development. 1999;126:2623–2630. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.12.2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Davis RJ, Tavsanli BC, Dittrich C, Walldorf U, Mardon G. Drosophila retinal homeobox (drx) is not required for establishment of the visual system, but is required for brain and clypeus development. Dev Biol. 2003;259:272–287. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Roignant JY, Legent K, Janody F, Treisman JE. The transcriptional co-factor Chip acts with LIM-homeodomain proteins to set the boundary of the eye field in Drosophila. Development. 2010;137:273–281. doi: 10.1242/dev.041244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Cavodeassi F, Modolell J, Campuzano S. The Iroquois homeobox genes function as dorsal selectors in the Drosophila head. Development. 2000;127:1921–1929. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.9.1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Williams JL, Boyan GS. Building the central complex of the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria: axons pioneering the w, x, y, z tracts project onto the primary commissural fascicle of the brain. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2008;37:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Evans CJ, Olson JM, Ngo KT, Kim E, Lee NE, et al. G-TRACE: rapid Gal4-based cell lineage analysis in Drosophila. Nat Methods. 2009;6:603–605. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Renn SC, Armstrong JD, Yang M, Wang Z, An X, et al. Genetic analysis of the Drosophila ellipsoid body neuropil: organization and development of the central complex. J Neurobiol. 1999;41:189–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Pereanu W, Younossi-Hartenstein A, Lovick J, Spindler S, Hartenstein V. Lineage-based analysis of the development of the central complex of the Drosophila brain. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519:661–689. doi: 10.1002/cne.22542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Young JM, Armstrong JD. Building the central complex in Drosophila: the generation and development of distinct neural subsets. J Comp Neurol. 518:1525–1541. doi: 10.1002/cne.22285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Williams JLD. Anatomical studies of the insect central nervous system: a ground plan of the midbrain and an introduction to the central complex in the locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera). Journal of Zoology, London. 1975;176:67–86. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Wegerhoff R, Breidbach O. Structure and development of the larval central complex in a holometabolous insect, the beetle Tenebrio molitor. Cell Tissue Res. 1992;268:341–358. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Chang T, Mazotta J, Dumstrei K, Dumitrescu A, Hartenstein V. Dpp and Hh signaling in the Drosophila embryonic eye field. Development. 2001;128:4691–4704. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.23.4691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Chang T, Shy D, Hartenstein V. Antagonistic relationship between Dpp and EGFR signaling in Drosophila head patterning. Dev Biol. 2003;263:103–113. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00448-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Finkelstein R, Smouse D, Capaci TM, Spradling AC, Perrimon N. The orthodenticle gene encodes a novel homeo domain protein involved in the development of the Drosophila nervous system and ocellar visual structures. Genes Dev. 1990;4:1516–1527. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.9.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Pignoni F, Baldarelli RM, Steingrimsson E, Diaz RJ, Patapoutian A, et al. The Drosophila gene tailless is expressed at the embryonic termini and is a member of the steroid receptor superfamily. Cell. 1990;62:151–163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90249-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Irimia M, Pineiro C, Maeso I, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Casares F, et al. Conserved developmental expression of Fezf in chordates and Drosophila and the origin of the Zona Limitans Intrathalamica (ZLI) brain organizer. Evodevo. 2010;1:7. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-1-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Yang X, Zarinkamar N, Bao R, Friedrich M. Probing the Drosophila retinal determination gene network in Tribolium (I): The early retinal genes dachshund, eyes absent and sine oculis. Dev Biol. 2009;333:202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Kotkamp K, Klingler M, Schoppmeier M. Apparent role of Tribolium orthodenticle in anteroposterior blastoderm patterning largely reflects novel functions in dorsoventral axis formation and cell survival. Development. 2010;137:1853–1862. doi: 10.1242/dev.047043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Schröder R. The genes orthodenticle and hunchback substitute for bicoid in the beetle Tribolium. Nature. 2003;422:621–625. doi: 10.1038/nature01536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Chen G, Handel K, Roth S. The maternal NF-kappaB/dorsal gradient of Tribolium castaneum: dynamics of early dorsoventral patterning in a short-germ beetle. Development. 2000;127:5145–5156. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.23.5145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Sanchez-Salazar J, Pletcher MT, Bennett R, Brown SJ, Dandamudi TJ, et al. The Tribolium decapentaplegic gene is similar in sequence, structure, and expression to the Drosophila dpp gene. Dev Genes Evol. 1996;206:237–246. doi: 10.1007/s004270050049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Technau GM, Campos-Ortega JA. Fate-mapping in wildtype Drosophila melanogaster. II. Injections of horseradish peroxidase in cells of the early gastrula stage. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1985;194:196–212. [Google Scholar]
- 166.Roth S. Gastrulation in other insects. In: Stern CD, editor. Gastrulation: From cells to Embryo. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2004. pp. 105–121. [Google Scholar]
- 167.Birkan M, Schaeper ND, Chipman AD. Early patterning and blastodermal fate map of the head in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus. Evol Dev. 2011;13:436–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Zuber ME, Gestri G, Viczian AS, Barsacchi G, Harris WA. Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development. 2003;130:5155–5167. doi: 10.1242/dev.00723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Macdonald R, Barth KA, Xu Q, Holder N, Mikkola I, et al. Midline signalling is required for Pax gene regulation and patterning of the eyes. Development. 1995;121:3267–3278. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.10.3267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Geng X, Speirs C, Lagutin O, Inbal A, Liu W, et al. Haploinsufficiency of Six3 fails to activate Sonic hedgehog expression in the ventral forebrain and causes holoprosencephaly. Dev Cell. 2008;15:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Tessmar-Raible K. The evolution of neurosecretory centers in bilaterian forebrains: insights from protostomes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:492–501. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Cohen MM., Jr Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic, and molecular dimensions. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:658–673. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Trauner J, Schinko J, Lorenzen MD, Shippy TD, Wimmer EA, et al. Large-scale insertional mutagenesis of a coleopteran stored grain pest, the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum, identifies embryonic lethal mutations and enhancer traps. BMC Biol. 2009;7:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008;9:299–306. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ, editors. Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York: Academic Press; 1965. pp. 97–166. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Bolognesi R, Beermann A, Farzana L, Wittkopp N, Lutz R, et al. Tribolium Wnts: evidence for a larger repertoire in insects with overlapping expression patterns that suggest multiple redundant functions in embryogenesis. Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:193–202. doi: 10.1007/s00427-007-0170-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Schinko J, Posnien N, Kittelmann S, Koniszewski N, Bucher G. Single and Double Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization in Red Flour Beetle (Tribolium) Embryos. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2009;2009:pdb.prot5258-. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Wohlfrom H, Schinko JB, Klingler M, Bucher G. Maintenance of segment and appendage primordia by the Tribolium gene knodel. Mech Dev. 2006;123:430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Brown SJ, Mahaffey JP, Lorenzen MD, Denell RE, Mahaffey JW. Using RNAi to investigate orthologous homeotic gene function during development of distantly related insects. Evol Dev. 1999;1:11–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.1999.99013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Bucher G, Scholten J, Klingler M. Parental RNAi in Tribolium (Coleoptera). Curr Biol. 2002;12:R85–86. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00666-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Posnien N, Schinko J, Grossmann D, Shippy TD, Konopova B, et al. RNAi in the red flour beetle (Tribolium). Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009;2009:pdb prot5256. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Beermann A, Schroder R. Functional stability of the aristaless gene in appendage tip formation during evolution. Dev Genes Evol. 2004;214:303–308. doi: 10.1007/s00427-004-0411-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.