Vascular Imaging in Stroke: Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Advances in stroke treatment have mirrored advances in vascular imaging. Understanding and advances in reperfusion therapies were made possible by improvements in computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, neurovascular ultrasound, and renewed interest in catheter angiography. As technology allows better noninvasive vascular diagnosis, digital subtraction angiography (the remaining gold standard for vascular imaging) is increasingly used for rescue procedures and elective interventions. This review will examine specific advantages and disadvantages of different vascular imaging modalities as related to stroke diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13311-011-0042-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Our ability to diagnose and differentiate a stroke depends almost entirely on imaging and further determination of a specific pathogenic mechanism, which often relies on imaging of the pre-cerebral and cerebral vasculature. This chapter will review noninvasive and invasive tools available to clinicians for diagnostic work-up and monitoring of stroke patients.

Noninvasive Vascular Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) are the most frequently used MRA techniques for the evaluation of cervical and intracranial arteries in patients with cerebrovascular disease. These techniques are based on gradient echocardiographic sequences with either 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional volume acquisition [1]. TOF-MRA does not require an injection of a contrast medium and therefore constitutes an alternative for patients who are unable to receive contrast. Even though spatial resolution with TOF-MRA is superior to that in CE-MRA (especially 3-dimensional TOF sequences), the volume covered is limited by vascular saturation artifact, thus making this technique more suitable for the evaluation of the intracranial vasculature (Table 1) [1, 2]. Since vascular signal is dependent on flow direction and velocity through the imaging plane, TOF-MRA tends to overestimate the degree, as well as length of stenosis (mainly in the presence of turbulence, slow or re-circulating/reversed blood flow). Therefore, the distal vasculature may not be accurately displayed [2]. Nevertheless, TOF-MRA has an acceptable sensitivity for the depiction of intracranial steno-occlusive lesions compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA). The less frequently used phase-contrast MRA may provide additional physiologic information like blood flow velocity and flow direction [2, 3].

Table 1.

Clinical indications for various vascular imaging modalities

	MRA	CTA	Duplex	TCD	DSA
Clinical indications	• Extracranial CE-MRA	• Acute cerebral ischemia	• Initial screening for pre-cerebral artery stenosis and occlusions	• Sickle cell disease	• Gold standard diagnostic test
	• Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (TOF-MRA)	• Intra- and extracranial atherosclerotic disease	• Arterial dissection	• Acute cerebral ischemia	• Intra- and extracranial atherosclerotic disease
	• Cerebral aneurysms/arteriovenous malformations/cavernomas	• Cerebral aneurysms/ AVM/ cavernomas	• Follow-up after carotid artery stenting and CEA	• Intracranial atherosclerotic disease	• Cerebral aneurysms and AVM
	• Arterial dissection	• Atypical bleeding		• Vasomotor reactivity	• Atypical bleeding
	• Atypical bleeding			• Cerebral embolization	• Arterial dissection
				• Cardiac right-to-left shunt	• Vasculitis
				• Vasospasm after SAH	• Follow-up after intracranial stenting
				• Cerebral circulatory arrest
				• Periprocedural or surgical monitoring

AVM = arteriovenous malformations; CEA = carotid endarterectomy; CE-MRA = contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; CTA = computed tomographic angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; TCD = transcranial Doppler; TOF-MRA = time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography

With CE-MRA, the passage of a gadolinium contrast bolus through the arteries of interest provides an angiographic effect, which is independent of blood flow, thus having fewer artifacts derived from turbulences and slow blood flow [1]. Image acquisition in CE-MRA is faster and provided coverage is larger. For these reasons, assessment of cervical carotid and vertebral artery disease (particularly high-grade stenoses and blood flow disturbances) is more accurate with CE-MRA than with TOF-MRA techniques [4, 5], and atherosclerotic carotid artery lesions amenable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be more reliably differentiated (Fig. 1) [4].

Fig. 1.

a Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (3-dimensional volume-rendering) shows a complete occlusion of the right common carotid artery (arrowheads), as well as near complete occlusion of the proximal left internal carotid artery (ICA) just after the bifurcation (arrow). b–d Transcranial Doppler (TCD) shows a blunted signal in the right middle cerebral artery (RMCA), reversed right ophthalmic artery (ROA) and anterior cross-filling from the left to right anterior cerebral artery (RACA) consistent with a hemodynamically significant obstruction in the right ICA. e–g Blunted waveforms in the left middle cerebral artery (LMCA) and terminal ICA (LTICA), as well as reversed left ophthalmic artery (LOA) suggestive of high-grade stenosis in the cervical ICA. h CTA source images demonstrates near occlusion of the left proximal ICA (arrow) and a complete occlusion of the right ICA. i Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography shows substantial motion artifacts, as well as an occlusive appearance of the right ICA with an abnormal flow signal in the remainder of the visualized left ICA. j, k Digital subtraction angiography reveals an aneurysmal dilatation of the proximal left ICA and a focal stenosis just distal to the aneurysm that measures approximately 75% by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria (K, arrows). Intracranial anteroposterior view (J) with injection of contrast into the left ICA shows relatively poor flow into the left internal carotid artery system (arrows) attributable to the high-grade ICA stenosis. l, m Carotid duplex B-mode and color Doppler show evidence of a right internal carotid artery (RICA) occlusion with no detectable flow and a >70% stenosis in the left internal carotid artery (LICA)

Furthermore, CE-MRA may demonstrate a complete occlusion or stenosis of the arterial lumen in patients with cranio-cervical arterial dissections and improve the overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of this disease [6] if combined with T2 fat-suppression sequences.

Another application for MRA is the diagnosis, screening, and follow-up imaging of cerebral aneurysms, which can be detected by TOF-MRA techniques, depending on the overall size of the aneurysms (sensitivity increases with larger size aneurysms) and local hemodynamics [5, 7].

As a certain limitation, it should be mentioned that availability and feasibility of MRI is limited in acute stroke patients (Table 2) [8]. Some stroke patients cannot tolerate MRI or cooperate, poorly leading to movement artifacts. MRI/MRA cannot be used in patients with pacemakers, certain magnetic appliances, and those who have allergies to contrast media. In addition, there was a significant decline in the use of gadolinium, due to recent recognition of its rare complications, such as nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with an impaired kidney function [9].

Table 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of various vascular imaging modalities

	MRA	CTA	Duplex	TCD	DSA
Advantages	• No contrast needed (TOF)	• Widely available	• Inexpensive	• Inexpensive	• High-spatial resolution
	• Hemodynamic information from the aortic arch up to the cerebral vessels	• Rapid data acquisition	• Portable	• Portable	• Immediate treatment option
		• Flow independent technique	• Widely available	• Widely available	• Gold standard for several indications and therapeutic decision making
		• Accuracy close to DSA		• Real-time monitoring/hemo-dynamic information
		• Less motion artifacts
Disadvantages	• Limited availability and feasibility in acute setting	• Contrast dependent	• Operator and experience dependent	• Operator- and experience dependent	• Contrast dependent
	• Contrast dependent (CE-MRA)	• Radiation exposure	• Assessment limited to ICA on the neck and inter-osseal VA segments	• Dependent on bone “window” without contrast	• Radiation exposure
	• Flow and motion artifacts				• Peri- and postprocedural complications
	• Inferior accuracy				• Availability still limited

CE-MRA = contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; CTA = computed tomographic angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; ICA = internal carotid artery; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; TCD = transcranial Doppler; TOF = time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography; VA = vertebral artery

CTA

CTA is the most common first-line diagnostic modality for vascular imaging in the setting of acute stroke [10]. CTA is widely available, well tolerated by the majority of stroke patients, and with a single bolus of iodinated contrast, thin-slice, high-resolution, volumetric spiral computed tomographic (CT) images of the pre-cerebral and cerebral vasculature, CTA can be obtained quickly after nonenhanced CT [11, 12]. In addition to axial CTA source images (CTA-SI), post-processing techniques for 3-dimensional CTA imaging (e.g., maximum intensity projection, shaded surface display, and volume-rendering techniques) can be performed in few minutes and provide images comparable with those obtained with DSA (Fig. 1) [13, 14].

In acute ischemic stroke, CTA can reliably detect intracranial proximal arterial occlusions and stenoses (Table 1) [15]. The presence of a proximal arterial occlusion on CTA predicts functional outcome, final infarct size, and response to intravenous thrombolysis, thus facilitating decision making for intra-arterial rescue procedures [16, 17]. In addition, CTA-SI can provide information regarding the quality of collateral circulation and may improve the sensitivity to identify ischemic areas not seen on nonenhanced CT [18].

CTA is also highly accurate in determining the severity of atherosclerotic stenoses in the extracranial arteries, especially the carotid arteries, thus aiding selection of patients amenable for revascularization [19]. Furthermore, it allows a differentiation between near-occlusions and complete occlusions and is valuable in the diagnosis of an extracranial arterial dissection [20].

In comparison to DSA, CTA shows a high sensitivity and specificity in the assessment of intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) [21], and CTA is deployed as the initial test of choice in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. In addition, CTA is now increasingly being used in the diagnostic work-up of an underlying cause of a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, particularly in young patients [22], and to identify the “spot” sign that can select patients at greater risk of hematoma expansion, because contrast extravasation may occur with compromised vessel integrity [23, 24].

There are some disadvantages with CTA (Table 2). One of the major concerns is the risk of radio-contrast nephropathy, particularly in patients with renal dysfunction or diabetes. However, a recent published study showed a low incidence of radio-contrast nephropathy in acute stroke patients undergoing emergent CTA, irrespective of baseline creatinine levels [25]. The risk of other immediate adverse reactions after injection of iodinated contrast material seems acceptable [26]. In addition to noncontrast CT, the use of CTA increases radiation dose and multiple examinations can result in a large cumulative dose that may harm patients [27].

Cerebrovascular Ultrasound

Current ultrasound methods offer fragmented assessment of the cerebrovascular tree. Carotid and vertebral duplex evaluates proximal segments accessible through the soft tissues on the neck, whereas a transcranial ultrasound can detect flow in some portions of the intracranial carotid system, proximal branches of the circle of Willis, and intracranial vertebrobasilar system. In turn, we examine pre-cerebral and intracranial imaging with an ultrasound.

Carotid and Vertebral Duplex

Extracranial ultrasound can differentiate normal from diseased arteries, identify all categories of stenosis, localize the disease process, including occlusions, detect progressions of the disease, and assess collateral circulation to maintain cerebral blood flow (Table 1). This constitutes a cheap and widely available screening method to diagnose atheromatous disease in the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) and common carotid artery and to further identify candidates for more expensive or invasive diagnostic evaluations (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Approximately 1 of 5 ischemic strokes originates from atherothrombotic plaque and stenosis in the carotid arteries [28]. Carotid ultrasound can localize the plaque, and identify its length, composition, and surface. Further Doppler information on peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities, and ICA/common carotid artery ratio is further used to predict the North American carotid artery stenosis range [29]. Although the 2 large carotid endarterectomy trials, the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) applied different methodologies to calculate the percent diameter reduction of the tightest residual lumen [30, 31], the current recommendation is that the percent diameter reduction should be measured relative to ICA diameter in the disease-free ICA distal to the stenosis (i.e., the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] or the North American [N] method). Precise estimation of the stenosis grade is difficult, and ultrasound studies are expected to provide range estimation (i.e., 50–69%) vs pin-point measurement (i.e., 53.7%) due to the wide variability of key velocity measurements and the choice of single projection angiographic images to measure the stenosis [29, 32]. Numerous and variable criteria for quantifying the degree of carotid stenosis were introduced in the past 40 years [33–36]. In 2002, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) convened a multidisciplinary panel that arrived at the SRU Consensus Criteria for grading carotid stenosis with duplex ultrasound (Table 3) [29]. The criteria are recommended for use by new ultrasound laboratories in development and self-validating studies of local interpretation criteria, and as a comparator criteria for established laboratories, because in the experience of participating experts, most accurate local criteria should be quite similar (i.e., with a 10–20% difference from values identified in Table 3). The limitation of the SRU Consensus Criteria is that these are intended for grading a focal and unilateral carotid stenosis only, and these criteria do not offer guidance to grade tandem or bilateral carotid artery disease.

Table 3.

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus criteria for carotid stenosis

Stenosis range N method	ICA PSV	ICA/CCA PSV ratio	ICA EDV	Plaque
Normal	< 125 cm/s	< 2.0	< 40 cm/s	None
< 50%	< 125 cm/s	< 2.0	< 40 cm/s	< 50% diameter reduction
50–69%	125–230 cm/s	2.0–4.0	40–100 cm/s	> 50% diameter reduction
70-near occlusion	> 230 cm/s	> 4.0	> 100 cm/s	> 50% diameter reduction
Near occlusion	May be low or undetectable	Variable	Variable	Significant, detectable lumen
Occlusion	Undetectable	Not applicable	Not applicable	Significant, no detectable lumen

EDV = end diastolic velocity; ICA/CCA = internal carotid artery/common carotid artery; PSV = peak systolic velocity

Carotid ultrasound is also a useful tool in the diagnosis of arterial occlusions and some dissections. Although carotid ultrasound is both sensitive and specific to identify proximal atherothrombotic or embolic ICA occlusion [37], the sensitivity of carotid ultrasound for detection of a double lumen and an intimal flap is variable [38]. Intramural hematomas may be missed either when they are located outside the arterial segments directly visible by carotid ultrasound or if they are too small to cause hemodynamically significant stenosis. For this reason, a negative carotid ultrasound requires follow-up with an MRA or DSA if a distal arterial dissection is strongly suspected.

Early re-stenosis after carotid artery stenting or CEA occurs in as much as 10% of patients [39] and carotid ultrasound remains the primary imaging modality for postintervention surveillance. Analog to the assessment of native carotid arteries, limitations include a high carotid bifurcation, a long ICA plaque, calcification shadows, acoustic artifacts, short neck, presence of tortuosity, and near-occlusion. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the deployment of a stent alters the compliance and blood flow velocities [40], which make it difficult to use the standard velocity criteria for the evaluation of stented carotid arteries. Thus, in some cases, additional imaging modalities, such as CTA or MRA, may be considered to confirm abnormal findings.

Our ability to diagnose and understand the mechanisms of vertebrobasilar ischemia is less developed compared to the anterior circulation vessels. Vertebral ultrasound allows segmental assessment of the vertebral arteries often obscured by transverse processes and deep location of the vertebral origins. If successful, ultrasound can detect stenoses of the vertebral arteries and less commonly detect the presence of atherosclerotic plaques, intraluminal thrombi, or a double lumen with an extracranial vertebral dissection [38, 41]. Fewer validation studies are available to derive diagnostic criteria, and generally the accuracy parameters for vertebral ultrasound are less than these of carotid duplex.

Transcranial Doppler and Transcranial Duplex

Although the term imaging refers mostly to transcranial duplex technology and its ability to generate color or power flow images, both transcranial Doppler (TCD) and duplex terms refer to the assessment of the proximal cerebral vasculature through spectral Doppler sampling for flow velocity and waveforms. Specific descriptions of ultrasound technology and scanning protocols can be found elsewhere [42, 43].

TCD became the standard of care at comprehensive stroke centers as being one of the essential diagnostic tests and services that a modern stroke team should have at their disposal [44]. Current clinical indications and expected outcomes were recently summarized by the multidisciplinary panel of the American Society of Neuroimaging Practice Guidelines Committee (Table 1) [45].

TCD offers complementary information to MRA and CTA in the assessment of cerebral ischemia [46, 47]. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade ICA stenosis can undergo TCD monitoring to detect, localize, and quantify cerebral embolization [48]. This information is helpful to establish the diagnosis and change management strategy, if emboli are found pointing to a potential proximal source of embolism or continuing embolization that identifies the patients at highest risk of recurrent or first-ever stroke [49]. The presence of emboli on TCD distal to a high-grade asymptomatic ICA stenosis identifies patients at higher risk of first-ever stroke and may be a useful risk predictor for identifying those asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients who might benefit from intervention with CEA [49]. In patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is more effective than monotherapy in reducing asymptomatic embolization [50, 51]. Moreover, detection of emboli on TCD can be the only sign of a proximal arterial dissection, partially occlusive thrombus or an unrecognized cardiac source of embolism, and may identify paradoxic embolization through a cardiac right-to-left shunt (during intravenous injection of agitated normal saline) [46, 52].

Intracranial MRA often shows flow gaps due to turbulence or reversal of flow direction, thus overestimating the degree of an arterial stenosis. TCD findings of the residual flow signals, abnormal waveforms, reversed flow direction, collateral channels, and flow diversion to a branching vessel confirm the presence of an intracranial steno-occlusive lesion in real time, and validated diagnostic criteria are available (Fig. 1) [36, 41]. The Thrombolysis in Brain Ischemia (TIBI) flow grading system was developed to evaluate residual flow on TCD and to monitor thrombus dissolution in real time [53], which can be helpful in prediction of stroke severity and mortality, as well as likelihood of re-canalization and clinical improvement [54]. Of note, the yield of TCD is greatest the closer in time it is performed to stroke symptom onset, and it is higher in anterior than posterior circulation [55]. Notably, power motion mode Doppler TCD or imaging with transcranial color-coded duplex increase the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound tests for the assessment of vertebrobasilar circulation [56].

TCD can reliably rule out a proximal intracranial stenosis according to the findings of the recently published Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial, which aimed to define the positive and negative predictive value of TCD/MRA for the identification of 50 to 99% intracranial stenosis in the intracranial ICA, middle cerebral artery, vertebral artery, and basilar artery [57]. However, abnormal findings on TCD or MRA require a confirmatory test, such as catheter angiography, to reliably identify the degree of intracranial stenoses.

In addition to vessel surveillance, TCD testing can include assessment of vasomotor reactivity, which may be of interest for providing a more comprehensive indication to surgical treatment in subgroups of subjects with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis and occlusions [58, 59]. This information is not available from carotid duplex ultrasound examination and may require additional contrast studies with magnetic resonance perfusion or Diamox single photon emission computed tomography or perfusion CT that are costly, and may lead to complications related to vasoactive Diamox effects that last longer than a brief hypercapnia with breath holding.

Numerous studies showed the effectiveness of TCD in diagnosing cerebral vasospasm, both in the anterior and posterior circulation after SAH, allowing early planning of interventions, including angioplasty and nicardipine infusions [60, 61]. A detailed review of this application of TCD and the role of CTA in SAH is largely outside the scope of our article, which focuses mostly on ischemic stroke.

Continuous TCD monitoring during intra-arterial rescue procedures may detect potentially harmful flow changes like re-occlusion, hypo- and hyper-perfusion or thromboembolism and air embolization, and it can be helpful particularly when neurological assessment in patients is limited because of sedation and intubations [62].

In summary, TCD provides a noninvasive and inexpensive (relative to angiography) monitoring modality that can be used in a variety of clinical situations to provide real-time physiological information that is often unobtainable with other testing, without increasing patient risks (i.e., repeated radiation doses, contrast injections) and associated costs (Table 2). The main disadvantage of TCD and duplex imaging is that these tests are extremely operator-dependent and the skilled sonographers and clinician users of these technologies are few in number to meet the need of stroke patients.

Invasive Vascular Imaging

DSA

Two large, randomized, clinical trials, the NASCET and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), demonstrated the benefit of CEA in patients with high-grade (70–99%) symptomatic carotid artery stenosis [30, 31]. Thus, the accurate diagnosis of high-grade stenosis remains critical for selection of stroke patients who are amenable to CEA. The severity of stenosis in the endarterectomy trials was evaluated by DSA, which has become the gold standard for selecting patients for CEA, and recently for deciding between CEA and stenting (Table 1).

DSA, however, has a risk of peri- and post-procedural complications (e.g., embolism, dissections, retroperitoneal hematoma, allergic reactions to contrast medium, nephropathy), particularly in older patients with polyvascular atherosclerosis, resulting in a morbidity and mortality from 1 to 4% [62, 63]. In the ACAS trial of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, half of early stroke risk was attributed to performance of diagnostic catheter angiography [64]. Even in patients without new neurological symptoms after DSA, minor asymptomatic infarctions could be apparent on cerebral imaging, presumably as a consequence of embolism [65].

The question as to whether or not to perform CEA could be solely based on carotid duplex ultrasound or on the combination of noninvasive vascular imaging modalities. In a comparative study by Patel et al. [66], carotid ultrasound, CTA, MRA, and DSA were performed in patients with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. The differentiation from operable and nonoperable carotid artery lesions was achieved with ultrasound (most closely), CTA (tendency to underestimation), and MRA (tendency to overestimation) in a majority of studied patients comparable with DSA. However, a comparable diagnostic accuracy was only achieved when 2 noninvasive tests showed congruent results; in disagreement, the third modality had to also be taken into account to make an accurate judgment as compared with DSA. Therefore, no technique on its own appears accurate enough to replace DSA to determine the severity of a carotid artery stenosis amenable for CEA (Fig. 1). The current guidelines for acute ischemic stroke recommend carotid ultrasound as a screening technique for imaging the pre-cerebral vasculature, whereas a confirmatory study with a second modality, such as CE-MRA or CTA seems justified, particularly when making decisions regarding invasive therapies [67].

The interest in performance of diagnostic DSA and development on newer catheters aiding neurovascular therapies is now fueled by proliferation of intra-arterial rescue procedures offered to stroke patients by the growing number of neuroendovascular trained specialists. DSA is increasingly used in the diagnostic work-up and management of acute ischemic stroke patients, emerging as an important therapeutic tool [68]. To further support the use of DSA in routine practice, a randomized efficacy phase III trial is needed to confirm the promise of intra-arterial rescue shown in the Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism (PROACT) II study [69].

DSA has been the preferred follow-up imaging modality for detecting in-stent re-stenosis after intracranial stenting, which constitutes a frequent long-term sequela [70]. Although less invasive techniques for follow-up investigations would be desirable (particularly in patients at high risk for in-stent re-stenosis), noninvasive imaging with TCD, CTA, and MRA is potentially affected by stent-related artifacts and hemodynamic changes.

Limitations of DSA include its operator dependency and availability because cerebral angiography requires specific and intensive training (Table 2) [71]. However, the future progress of stroke care lies in the establishment of hub-and-spokes networks to reach the population of patients with established reperfusion therapy, such as tPA and to aid the transfer of patients in need of comprehensive stroke care [44] to the centers with subspecialty trained clinicians. Catheter angiography and expert use of advanced vascular imaging technologies will play a pivotal role in this process.