Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1999;26(2):107–113.

The Vineberg legacy: internal mammary artery implantation from inception to obsolescence.

J L Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC325613  PMID: 10397432

Abstract

At a time when cardiac surgery was still approached with hesitation, Arthur M. Vineberg developed the procedure of direct implantation of the internal mammary artery into the left ventricle for the relief of myocardial ischemia. The Vineberg operation, as it became known, had merit but never received broad endorsement from the medical and surgical communities. Its physiologic benefits were inconsistent and for years were documented by little more than anecdotal evidence, until coronary angiography (newly developed by Mason Sones) was able to demonstrate that the procedure did in fact increase perfusion in the diseased heart. This supporting evidence came rather late, for within the next decade direct aortocoronary artery bypass grafting overtook the Vineberg operation as a more efficient means of revascularizing the myocardium. Thousands of patients, however, had benefited from internal mammary artery implantation at a time when options were few; and the procedure was an aggressive move towards current (and similarly aggressive) treatments for myocardial ischemia. Moreover, the characteristics of the myocardium that Vineberg sought to exploit may form the basis for future therapy. A reappraisal of the implant is warranted, as today's physicians and surgeons inherit the last remaining recipients of Vineberg implants.

Full text

PDF
110

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BECK C. S., LEIGHNINGER D. S. Operations for coronary artery disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1954 Nov 27;156(13):1226–1233. doi: 10.1001/jama.1954.02950130006002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigelow W. G., Aldridge H. E., MacGregor D. C. Internal mammary implantation (Vineberg operation) for coronary heart disease: cineangiography and long-term follow up. Ann Surg. 1966 Sep;164(3):457–464. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196609000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Björk V. O., Björk L. Internal mammary artery implantation for angina pectoris: angiographic evaluation of Beck and Vineberg procedures. Ann Surg. 1966 Aug;164(2):236–242. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196608000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brewer L. A., 3rd Open heart surgery and myocardial revascularization. Historical notes. Am J Surg. 1981 Jun;141(6):618–631. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90066-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Connolly J. E. The history of coronary artery surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978 Dec;76(6):733–744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dobell A. R. Arthur Vineberg and the internal mammary artery implantation procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Jan;53(1):167–169. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90785-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drott C. The history of cervicothoracic sympathectomy. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994;(572):5–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EFFLER D. B., GROVES L. K., SONES F. M., Jr, SHIREY E. K. INCREASED MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION BY INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY IMPLANT: VINEBERG'S OPERATION. Ann Surg. 1963 Oct;158:526–536. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196310000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Favaloro R. G., Effler D. B., Groves L. K., Fergusson D. J., Lozada J. S. Double internal mammary artery-myocardial implantation. Clinical evaluation of results in 150 patients. Circulation. 1968 Apr;37(4):549–555. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.37.4.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Favaloro R. G., Effler D. B., Groves L. K., Fergusson D. J. Revascularization of the left ventricle by double internal mammary artery implant. Geriatrics. 1969 Apr;24(4):95–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Favaloro R. G., Effler D. B., Groves L. K., Sones F. M., Jr, Fergusson D. J. Myocardial revascularization by internal mammary artery implant procedures. Clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967 Sep;54(3):359–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GLOVER R. P., KITCHELL J. R., KYLE R. H., DAVILA J. C., TROUT R. G. Experiences with myocardial revascularization by division of the internal mammary arteries. Dis Chest. 1958 Jun;33(6):637–657. doi: 10.1378/chest.33.6.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GOETZ R. H., ROHMAN M., HALLER J. D., DEE R., ROSENAK S. S. Internal mammary-coronary artery anastomosis. A nonsuture method employing tantalum rings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961 Mar;41:378–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldman B. S. The Vineberg procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Dec;58(6):1793–1794. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91711-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gorlin R., Taylor W. J. Myocardial revascularization with internal mammary artery implantation: current status. JAMA. 1969 Feb 3;207(5):907–913. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayward R. H., Korompai F. L., Knight W. L. Long-term follow-up of the Vineberg internal mammary artery implant procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Jun;51(6):1002–1003. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91032-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolessov V. I. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967 Oct;54(4):535–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marks C. A history of coronary artery surgery. South Med J. 1973 Feb;66(2):249–253. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197302000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moncada S., Gryglewski R., Bunting S., Vane J. R. An enzyme isolated from arteries transforms prostaglandin endoperoxides to an unstable substance that inhibits platelet aggregation. Nature. 1976 Oct 21;263(5579):663–665. doi: 10.1038/263663a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mueller R. L., Rosengart T. K., Isom O. W. The history of surgery for ischemic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Mar;63(3):869–878. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)01375-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nasu M., Akasaka T., Chikusa H., Shoumura T. Flow reserve capacity of left internal thoracic artery 23 years after Vineberg procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Apr;61(4):1242–1244. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nguyen H. C., Grossi E. A., LeBoutillier M., 3rd, Steinberg B. M., Rifkin D. B., Baumann F. G., Colvin S. B., Galloway A. C. Mammary artery versus saphenous vein grafts: assessment of basic fibroblast growth factor receptors. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Aug;58(2):308–311. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)92198-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ochsner J. L., Moseley P. W., Mills N. L., Bower P. J. Long-term follow-up of internal mammary artery myocardial implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977 Feb;23(2):118–121. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SONES F. M., Jr, SHIREY E. K. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1962 Jul;31:735–738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salerno T. A., Keith F. M., Charrette E. J. Cardioplegic arrest in patients with previous Vineberg implants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Nov;78(5):769–771. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Santos G. H. Early use of internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Dec;56(6):1438–1439. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90717-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Selmonosky C. A., Ellison R. G. Hemodynamics of the tunneled segment of a myocardial vascular implant. Ann Thorac Surg. 1971 Aug;12(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shrager J. B. The Vineberg procedure: the immediate forerunner of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 May;57(5):1354–1364. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91403-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sparks C. H. Factors responsible for success of the Vineberg operation. An experimental study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1967 May;3(5):455–459. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66454-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Topaz O., Pavlos S., Mackall J. A., Nair R., Hsu J. The Vineberg procedure revisited: angiographic evaluation and coronary artery bypass surgery in a patient 21 years following bilateral internal mammary artery implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Mar;25(3):218–222. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810250309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Trapp W. G., Burton J. D., Oforsagd P. Detailed anatomy of early Vineberg anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969 Mar;57(3):450–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Treasure T. 25 years of cardiac surgery. Br J Hosp Med. 1991 Oct;46(4):214–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsang J. C., Chiu R. C. The phantom of "myocardial sinusoids": a historical reappraisal. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Dec;60(6):1831–1835. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00721-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. VINEBERG A. Coronary vascular anastomoses by internal mammary arter implantation. Can Med Assoc J. 1958 Jun 1;78(11):871–879. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. VINEBERG A., MILLER G. Internal mammary coronary anastomosis in the surgical treatment of coronary artery insufficiency. Can Med Assoc J. 1951 Mar;64(3):204–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vineberg A. M. RESTORATION OF CORONARY CIRCULATION BY ANASTOMOSIS. Can Med Assoc J. 1946 Aug;55(2):117–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vineberg A. Evidence that revascularization by ventricular-internal mammary artery implants increases longevity. Twenty-four year, nine month follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975 Sep;70(3):381–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Whittaker P., Rakusan K., Kloner R. A. Transmural channels can protect ischemic tissue. Assessment of long-term myocardial response to laser- and needle-made channels. Circulation. 1996 Jan 1;93(1):143–152. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.1.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Willerson J. T., Teaff R. Egyptian contributions to cardiovascular medicine. Tex Heart Inst J. 1996;23(3):191–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES