Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Feb;194(3):677–685. doi: 10.1128/JB.06531-11

The Sulfur Oxygenase Reductase from the Mesophilic Bacterium Halothiobacillus neapolitanus Is a Highly Active Thermozyme

Andreas Veith a, Hugo M Botelho b, Florian Kindinger a, Cláudio M Gomes b, Arnulf Kletzin a,
PMCID: PMC3264067  PMID: 22139503

Abstract

A biochemical, biophysical, and phylogenetic study of the sulfur oxygenase reductase (SOR) from the mesophilic gammaproteobacterium Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (HnSOR) was performed in order to determine the structural and biochemical properties of the enzyme. SOR proteins from 14 predominantly chemolithoautotrophic bacterial and archaeal species are currently available in public databases. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis showed that they form a coherent protein family. The HnSOR purified from Escherichia coli after heterologous gene expression had a temperature range of activity of 10 to 99°C with an optimum at 80°C (42 U/mg protein). Sulfite, thiosulfate, and hydrogen sulfide were formed at various stoichiometries in a range between pH 5.4 and 11 (optimum pH 8.4). Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering showed that the HnSOR adopts secondary and quaternary structures similar to those of the 24-subunit enzyme from the hyperthermophile Acidianus ambivalens (AaSOR). The melting point of the HnSOR was ≈20°C lower than that of the AaSOR, when analyzed with CD-monitored thermal unfolding. Homology modeling showed that the secondary structure elements of single subunits are conserved. Subtle changes in the pores of the outer shell and increased flexibility might contribute to activity at low temperature. We concluded that the thermostability was the result of a rigid protein core together with the stabilizing effect of the 24-subunit hollow sphere.

INTRODUCTION

Sulfur oxygenase reductases (SORs) catalyze a dioxygen-dependent disproportionation reaction of elemental sulfur with sulfite, thiosulfate, and sulfide as products. External cofactors or electron donors are not required, and the two enzyme activities could not be separated (equations 1 to 3) (19, 20, 30, 41).

Oxygenase S0+O2+H2OHSO3+H+ (1)
Disproportionation 3S0+3H2O2H2S+HSO3+H+ (2)
Sum 4S0+O2+4H2O2H2S+2HSO3+2H+ (3)

Thiosulfate is formed rapidly and in a pH-dependent manner from sulfite and excess sulfur at elevated temperatures (equation 4) (20, 33), but it is not yet known whether it is a primary reaction product as well.

graphic file with name zjb00312-1175-m01.jpg (4)

SOR is the initial sulfur-oxidizing enzyme in the chemolithoautotrophic and thermoacidophilic archaea Acidianus ambivalens (AaSOR) and Acidianus tengchongensis (AtSOR), which grow optimally at 70 to 80°C and pH 1 to 4. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of both highly similar SORs (88% identity) showed that the enzymes form large spherical, hollow oligomers with molecular masses of 845 kDa each composed of 24 identical subunits (25, 46). Each subunit contains a low-potential mononuclear nonheme iron site as the putative redox-active cofactor and an indispensable cysteine, which is persulfurated in the Ac. ambivalens SOR (C31) (25, 45, 46). The iron sites are located in smaller pockets within each subunit, which are accessible only from the large inner cavity. We had shown using site-directed mutagenesis that the three Fe-coordinating residues (H86, H90, and E114) and the persulfurated cysteine C31 are essential for catalysis. Most likely, the cysteine persulfide is involved in sulfur binding. Mutation of the other two cysteine residues in the protein did not abolish activity, not even in a double mutant (47). Our current hypothesis about the reaction mechanism of SOR predicts that the catalytic cycle is initiated by covalent sulfur binding to the active site C31 as a polysulfide chain (R-Sn-SH), followed by hydrolytic cleavage of the cysteine polysulfide to sulfide and a polysulfenyl moiety (R-Sn-SOH). Either the sulfenyl group or Fe2+ would subsequently activate dioxygen for polysulfenyl oxidation to the final product(s) sulfite and/or thiosulfate (19).

SORs or sor genes are not widespread in nature. So far, they have been reported only from some thermoacidophilic members of the domain Archaea and (hyper)thermophilic members of the domain Bacteria. Native SOR enzymes were initially purified from two Acidianus species (8, 20). Later, heterologous gene expression allowed study of the AaSOR and AtSOR in more detail (5, 41, 45). In addition, the SOR from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus was biochemically characterized, resulting in similar properties compared to the AaSOR and AtSOR (30). Surprisingly, sor genes were recently found in the genomes of a number of mesophilic and moderately thermophilic bacteria, showing that SORs are not restricted to hyperthermophiles. The issue is relevant for enzymes metabolizing elemental sulfur because the water solubility of the barely soluble solid substrate decreases significantly with temperature (478 nM α-S8 at 80°C to 6.1 nM at 4°C [15]), which raises the question whether substrate availability may limit enzyme activity at mesophilic conditions. There is one report of a SOR-like enzyme activity in soluble extracts of the mesophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, but molecular details were not given (43).

In order to investigate the structural and biochemical properties of SORs from a mesophile, we initiated a biochemical, biophysical, and enzymological study of the enzyme from the gammaproteobacterium Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (HnSOR) to resolve this issue. The chemolithoautotrophic microbe grows optimally at 28 to 32°C at more or less neutral pH with thiosulfate or sulfur as electron donors (17). The type strain (NCIMB 8539) was isolated from corroded concrete sewers in Australia (29) and named “pertaining to the seawater at Naples from which this species was probably first isolated by Nathansohn in 1902” (18). It seems to be common in sulfide-rich spas and microbial leaching communities (3, 49). Apart from the sor gene, the H. neapolitanus genome encodes a complete SOX complex, a multisubunit sulfur oxidation complex restricted to Bacteria (10). The same applies to Acidithiobacillus caldus. It had been speculated that two sulfur-oxidizing enzyme systems might be used at different temperatures (26). H. neapolitanus does not grow at temperatures exceeding 42°C (18), and data regarding the temperature regulation effects, which are hypothetical so far, are lacking for both species.

We show here that recombinant HnSOR is a highly active enzyme, with a very broad temperature spectrum of activity ranging from 10°C to more than 95°C. Also, the results of spectroscopy and in silico modeling suggest that the enzyme adopts secondary and quaternary structure similar to those from (hyper)thermophiles. The activity optimization of the HnSOR is discussed as an apparent adaptive response to substrate limitation at mesophilic conditions, which allows efficient sulfur-based energy metabolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strain and culture conditions.

Halothiobacillus neapolitanus DSM 15147 = NCIMB 8539 (1, 18) was obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung für Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ; Braunschweig, Germany; http://www.dsmz.de). Cells were grown in liquid culture at 28 to 30°C either with 1% (wt/vol) tyndallized elemental sulfur or with 1% (wt/vol) thiosulfate as an electron donor at pH 6.8 in medium 68 recommended on the DSMZ web server (http://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-microorganisms/culture-technology/list-of-media.html). Cells were grown until the color of bromocresol purple shifted to yellow, indicating a drop in pH, and subsequently harvested by centrifugation.

DNA procedures and heterologous gene expression.

Isolation of chromosomal H. neapolitanus (DSM15147) DNA was carried out according to a modified protocol of Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA extraction by S. V. Albers (http://www.rug.nl/gbb/research/researchGroups/molecularMicrobiology/research/extremophiles/DNAsulf.pdf; as of November 2011). Six hundred micrograms of sedimented H. neapolitanus cells was resuspended in 550 μl of TEN buffer (40 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 15 mM NaCl, pH 8). Fifty microliters of a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (wt/vol) solution was added to the suspension, which was subsequently incubated for 45 min at room temperature. After repeated phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) extractions, the genomic DNA was precipitated by the addition of 0.1 volume of a 3 M sodium acetate solution (pH 5.2) and 0.8 volume of 2-propanol. After incubation at −20°C for 2 h, the tubes were centrifuged for 30 min at 16,000 × g in a microcentrifuge. The pelleted DNA was washed once with 70% ethanol (by volume), centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g, dried at room temperature, and eventually resuspended in 50 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA).

The sor gene (GenBank locus tag Hneap_1222) was PCR amplified with the primers HnSOR_fwd (fwd stands for forward) (ACTAGT TAACGA GGGCAA AAAATG TCGAAT GAAAAT CCAATT ATA) and HnSOR_rev (rev stands for reverse) (GTGACG CCAAGC GCTTTG CTTAAG ATGCTT ACGCC) (Biomers, Ulm, Germany) which had been designed from the H. neapolitanus genome sequence (strain ATCC 23641). The PCR product was purified with the GenElute PCR clean-up kit (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. It was subsequently cleaved with the SpeI and Eco47III restriction enzymes and ligated into the XbaI/Eco47III-digested pASK75 vector (38). Positive transformants in Escherichia coli Top 10F cells (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) were sequenced and finally introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) CodonPlus RIL cells (Agilent, Böblingen, Germany).

For heterologous gene expression, 500-ml cultures were grown aerobically at 37°C in 2× LB medium in notched Erlenmeyer flasks. The expression was induced by the addition of 200 μg/liter anhydrotetracycline from a 2% (wt/vol) stock solution in dimethylformamide at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) between 0.6 and 0.8. Ferric citrate (100 μM) was added at the time of induction to ensure sufficient iron incorporation. The cultures were incubated for 20 h after induction with vigorous aeration and stirring. The Acidianus ambivalens sor gene (EMBL accession number X56616) was expressed heterologously after ligation into the pASK75 vector with a C-terminal Strep tag fusion (38) as described elsewhere (pASK-SOR.05 plasmid) (45).

Protein purification.

The cell pellet obtained by centrifugation was washed once in approximately 10 volumes (vol/wt) of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) with 150 mM NaCl (buffer W) and afterwards resuspended in 5 volumes of the same buffer. Cells were disrupted with a high-pressure homogenizer (0.18-mm nozzle and 1.35-MPa pressure; Constant Systems, Low March, Daventry, United Kingdom). After the first centrifugation step (10,000 × g for 30 min), the soluble protein-containing supernatant was centrifuged in an ultracentrifuge (100,000 × g for 45 min). The soluble total extract from 10 to 20 g of cells (wet weight) was applied either to a 1-ml Strep-Tactin gravity flow column or to an 8- to 10-ml Strep-Tactin superflow column (both columns from IBA, Göttingen, Germany) connected to an ÄKTApurifier 10 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). This step was performed repeatedly, when the binding capacity of the column was exceeded. The column was equilibrated with 5 column volumes (CV) of buffer W prior to loading. The column was subsequently washed with 6 CV of the same buffer. The protein was eluted by applying 3 CV of buffer E (buffer W with 2.5 mM desthiobiotin; IBA). The column was regenerated with 15 CV of buffer W with 1 mM hydroxyl-azophenyl benzoic acid (HABA) (Sigma). Alternatively, the column was regenerated with 3 CV each of double-distilled water (ddH2O), 0.5 M NaOH, and ddH2O instead of the regular HABA solution.

SOR activity and inhibition assays.

The SOR activity assay was performed as previously described (20, 45). Specific activities were routinely determined after incubation of 0.5 to 5 μg of purified enzyme at 80°C in a 1-ml solution of 0.1 M sodium citrate–0.2 M Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2) (27) containing 2% sulfur (wt/vol) and 0.1% Tween 20 (vol/vol). Samples were taken at appropriate time points (usually after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min), chilled on ice, and centrifuged briefly to sediment elemental sulfur. The concentrations of the reaction products hydrogen sulfide, sulfite, and thiosulfate were determined colorimetrically (20) and quantified with calibration curves. The specific activities were calculated from the linear increase of the reaction products. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as 1 μmol of sulfite plus thiosulfate (oxygenase) or hydrogen sulfide (reductase) formed per minute.

The optimal pH and temperature of HnSOR activity were determined with the same activity assay and different buffer systems. The citrate-phosphate buffer (27) was used to determine the protein activity in a range from pH 5 to 8. For higher pH values, 0.2 M Na2HPO4 was titrated with a 0.1 M Na3PO4 solution to the desired pH. The pH profile was recorded at 50°C due to extensive nonenzymatic sulfur disproportionation observed at high temperatures combined with high pH values (20, 40). Usually, 0.75 to 2.65 μg of purified HnSOR was added to 1 ml of ice-cold assay buffer. The reaction was started by incubation of the tubes in a heating block at 50°C. The concentrations of reaction products and specific activities were determined as described above.

Different amounts of a freshly prepared ZnCl2 solution resulting in a final concentration of 10 to 100 μM Zn2+ were added to the reaction mixtures in the SOR activity assay. The reaction mixture was kept on ice water for 30 min after 2 to 5 μg of enzyme had been added. The reaction was started by heating the samples to 80°C, and specific SOR activities were measured as described above. An enzymatic reaction mixture without ZnCl2 and a nonenzymatic reaction mixture with inhibitor but without SOR were used as controls. For a second control, 2 mM EDTA was added to the zinc-containing reaction vials to reverse inhibition. All measured specific activities were plotted against the Zn2+ concentration. The slope of the trend line was used for calculation of the appropriate Ki values.

Biochemical procedures.

The protein concentration was determined by the Coomassie blue method (2). Iron quantification was performed with pure protein preparations with the 2,4,6-tripyridyl-1,3,5-triazine (TPTZ) method (9). Denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed with 10% or 12% polyacrylamide–Tris–tricine gels (35).

CD spectroscopy.

Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured with a JASCO J-815 spectropolarimeter with Peltier temperature control. Typically, 10 accumulations were recorded in the far-UV region (180 to 260 nm) at 20°C with a data pitch of 0.2 nm and a 0.1-cm-path-length polarized quartz cuvette. A bandwidth of 2 nm was used with a detector response of 1 s and scanning speed of 200 nm/min. The spectra were obtained with 0.1 mg/ml of protein in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) and afterwards corrected by subtracting the spectrum of the buffer solution. Thermal unfolding was assessed by measuring the CD signal at 220 nm while raising the temperature at a 1°C/min rate.

DLS.

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses of recombinant Ac. ambivalens and H. neapolitanus SORs were performed on a Zetasizer Nano apparatus (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, United Kingdom) at 25°C. Samples (0.3 mg/ml in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer [pH 7.5]) were filtered through a 0.22-μm-pore-size filter and assayed with a quartz cuvette with 45-μl volume and 3-mm path length (Hellma, Müllheim, Germany). Three measurement cycles were performed for each protein sample. The data were averaged from 14 light scattering periods of 10 s for each cycle. Average protein diameter values were calculated using the corresponding Malvern Instruments DTS software.

Phylogenetic analysis and modeling.

SOR homologues from other microorganisms were detected by BLASTP searches with the Ac. ambivalens SOR amino acid sequence as a probe (NCBI accession number CAA39952.1) against the public database at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The deduced Sulfobacillus and Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans SOR sequences were identified via tBLASTN analysis in the respective genomes available at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (http://www.jgi.doe.gov). All SOR sequences were aligned by the KALIGN algorithm (24) with manual correction. The dendrogram was calculated feeding the alignment into the phylogeny server at the MAFFT site (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/phylogeny.html) with the default parameters and 100 bootstrap repetitions.

3D models of the H. neapolitanus SOR were predicted at the Phyre (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre/html/index.html) (16) and I-Tasser servers (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) (51). Energy minimization of the PHYRE model was performed with UCSF Chimera (http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera) (31). Clustering was done with CLUSPRO 2.0 (http://cluspro.bu.edu/login.php) (6, 22) and a single subunit in the dimer mode. Structure alignments, root mean square deviation (RMSD) readouts, and the preparation of figures were done with Pymol (7).

RESULTS

Phylogenetic analysis of the SOR protein family.

SORs form a conserved protein family with high mutual similarity (Fig. 1) (Pf07682; http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk) but with no recognizable similarity to outside proteins. The Halothiobacillus neapolitanus SOR (HnSOR) shared pairwise amino acid identities with other SORs ranging between 76% (Acidithiobacillus caldus) and 40% (Aquifex aeolicus). The archaeal SORs were about 40 to 42% identical relative to the HnSOR, while Sulfobacillus spp. (47%) were in between.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Color-coded phylogenetic dendrogram of the available SOR sequences in GenBank (GI numbers) (for alignment, see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The SOR sequences from uncultured (Uncult.) bacteria and other bacterial species, such as Ferroplasma (Ferropl.), Sulfobacillus (Sulfob.), Desulfomicrobium (Desulfom.), Acidithiobacillus (Acidithiob.), and Halothiobacillus (Halothiob.) species, are shown. Boldface type indicates that the SOR enzymes from this species were biochemically characterized. Underlining indicates that SOR activity was demonstrated in total cell extracts. Double underlining indicates that the X-ray structure is known. The numbers at the nodes of the dendrogram are bootstrap values. The optimal growth temperature is indicated by color as follows: red, optimal growth temperature of >70°C; orange, 51 to 70°C; green, 40 to 50°C; blue, ≈30°C; black, optimal growth temperature not known. Superscript letters a to d and g indicate the references as follows: a, this work; b, references 21 and 45; c, reference 41, d, reference 14; g, reference 30. The superscript e indicates that the sequence was retrieved from the web server of the Joint Genome Institute (http://www.jgi.doe.gov). The superscript f indicates that the two sor genes are located on different contigs of the Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans genome sequence; they are identical to the two SOR SA and SB sequences obtained from a bioleaching reactor described in reference 5 and to the SOR sequence of the bacterium SM-1 described by the same authors.

The aligned bacterial SOR amino acid sequences showed several regions with differences distinguishing them from the archaeal SORs (e.g., positions 91 to 96 and 112 to 117) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The dendrogram calculated from the alignment reflects a grouping of the enzymes according to phylogenetic relationship (Fig. 1). The Aquifex SOR was always the least similar enzyme (33 to 40% identity) compared to all other SORs. It contained two insertions and a slightly shortened C terminus compared to the otherwise constant lengths of the SOR sequences. An outgroup was not included, as no paralogous sequence family with even minimal similarity was identified so far.

Cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant H. neapolitanus SOR.

The H. neapolitanus sor gene (open reading frame [ORF] Hneap_1222) was cloned into the pASK75 expression vector with a C-terminal Strep tag (38). When sequenced for validation, the sor genes of strain DSM 15147 used here and of strain ATCC 23641 (genome sequence) were identical. When the resulting plasmid pASK_HnSOR was used to produce recombinant HnSOR from E. coli BL21 cells, 20 to 30% of the protein was recovered in the soluble form, while the remainder precipitated in inclusion bodies. The purification yield was 11 to 18 mg of soluble protein per liter of 2× LB medium. SDS-PAGE revealed a major 36-kDa band characteristic of full-length SOR (Fig. 2). The average iron content of the preparations was 1.6 ± 0.3 Fe per protein monomer.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Coomassie blue-stained 12% polyacrylamide–Tris–Tricine–SDS gel of HnSOR purified in a 1-ml Strep-Tactin gravity flow column. The protein was purified with 0.5-ml volume per wash/elution fraction according to the manufacturer's recommendation (IBA), and 10 μl of eluent was used per lane. Lanes; M, molecular mass markers; FT, flowthrough of E. coli soluble extract; W1 to W3, column wash fractions; E1 to E3, elution fractions. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated to the left of the gel.

Enzymatic properties of recombinant H. neapolitanus SOR.

The pH and temperature profiles of HnSOR activity were determined with an enzyme buffer that was modified from those used previously for the Acidianus and Aquifex SORs (20, 30, 45). Optimal activity was observed when a 100 mM citrate-phosphate buffer was used (instead of Tris-acetate), resulting in 42.4 U/mg oxygenase and 4.1 U/mg reductase activities at pH 8 and 80°C. Both oxygenase and reductase activities were measured at temperatures between 10 and 95°C with an optimal activity at 80°C (Fig. 3B and C). At moderate temperatures (i.e., 10 to 40°C), both enzyme activities were at similar levels. At temperatures higher than 40°C, oxygenase activity was up to 10-fold higher than reductase activity. The same effect was previously observed for the Aq. aeolicus SOR (30). An equal ratio between both oxygenase products (sulfite and thiosulfate) was observed at moderate temperatures (10 to 40°C). The ratio drastically changed when temperatures exceeded 50°C, resulting in an up to sixfold-higher level of thiosulfate at 75°C.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

(A) pH dependence of HnSOR activity recorded at 50°C. Specific enzyme activity is shown on the left-hand y axis (♦, sulfite plus thiosulfate production; □, H2S production) Nonenzymatic sulfur disproportionation is shown on the right-hand y axis (▴, sulfite plus thiosulfate; ○, H2S). (B) Temperature dependence of the specific activities of the Halothiobacillus neapolitanus SOR activity at pH 8. Sulfite plus thiosulfate production (♦) is shown on the left-hand y axis, and H2S production (□) is shown on the right-hand y axis. (C) Relative specific activities as a percentage of the value at 80°C. Inset, enlargement of the 0 to 30°C range.

The activity assays used to determine the optimal pH for protein activity (Fig. 3A) were carried out at the suboptimal temperature of 50°C in order to avoid the interference of nonenzymatic sulfur disproportionation observed at higher temperatures combined with a pH of >8 (20, 40). Oxygenase and reductase activities were observed between pH 5.4 and 11 with an optimum at pH 8.4 (Fig. 3A). At pH 12, it was no longer possible to distinguish between nonenzymatic sulfur disproportionation and the enzymatic reaction. Under slightly acidic conditions (pH 5.4 to 6.4), reductase and oxygenase activities were at comparable levels. The oxygenase and reductase activity ratios changed with increasing pH: at pH 7, a 2-fold excess of oxygenase over reductase activity was observed, which increased to almost 5-fold at the optimal pH of 8.4 (15.9 U/mg oxygenase and 3.27 U/mg reductase activities, respectively, at 50°C). Both products of the oxygenase reaction, sulfite and thiosulfate, were detected at all pH values tested. Sulfite was the major product under slightly acidic conditions (pH 5.4 to 6.4) (not shown). Thiosulfate formation was predominant under neutral and alkaline conditions: at pH 8, thiosulfate production was more than 3-fold higher than sulfite formation. The results are in agreement with the higher stability of thiosulfate at neutral and alkaline pH (equation 4).

The enzymatic activity of HnSOR was lost when the protein or protein extracts were stored at −20°C. Consequently, preparations were kept either at 4°C or at −20°C after the addition of 50% glycerol, which prevented loss of activity. Previous reports about the AaSOR and AtSOR had shown that Zn2+ is a potent inhibitor of these enzymes (4, 20, 45, 48). Ki values of HnSOR were 46 μM for the oxygenase and 36 μM for the reductase activity, which are values comparable with the AaSOR (Table 1) (48).

Table 1.

Properties of microorganisms and their sulfur oxygenase reductasesa

Propertyb H. neapolitanusc Aq. aeolicusd Ac. ambivalense Ac. brierleyif Ac. tengchongensisg
Topt (°C)
    Microorganism 30 85 80 65–70 70
    Enzyme 80 80 85 65 70
Sp act (U/mg) at Topt
    Oxygenase 42.1 78.8 10.6 0.9 186.7
    Reductase 4.1 3.05 2.6 NR 45.2
T range (°C) of enzyme 10–99 20–90 50–108 55–≥80 50–90
pHopt
    Microorganism 6.5–6.9 6.8 2.5 1.5–2.0 2.5
    Enzyme 8.4 NR 6.5–7.4 7.0 5
pH range of enzyme 5.4–11 5.5–8 5–8.4 NR 3.5–9
Mr
    Subunit 35,300 37,674 35,318 35,000h 35,172
    Holoenzyme (method) 848,000 (DLS) 602,000 (native gel) 844,000 (X-ray) 560,000 (native gel) 845,000 (X-ray)
Zn2+ inhibition of oxygenase/reductase Ki = 46/36 μM NR Ki = 45/39 μM NR 27%i
a

Properties of five microorganisms (Halothiobacillus neapolitanus, Aquifex aeolicus, Acidianus ambivalens, Acidianus brierleyi, and Acidianus tengchongensis) and their sulfur oxygenase reductases are shown.

b

Topt, optimum temperature; T range, temperature range; pHopt, optimum pH; NR, not reported; DLS, dynamic light scattering.

c

Data from this work.

d

Data from reference 30.

e

Data from references 20, 45, and 46.

f

Data from reference 8.

g

Data from references 11, 25, and 41.

h

Apparent molecular mass on SDS gel; the gene is not known.

i

Residual activity with 1 mM Zn2+.

Structural properties of recombinant H. neapolitanus SOR.

In order to compare the folding of mesophilic and (hyper)thermophilic SORs, we performed a circular dichroism (CD) study of the proteins from H. neapolitanus and Acidianus ambivalens (Fig. 4). The CD spectra of both proteins were rather similar, with minima around 220 nm and a shoulder at 209 nm (Fig. 4A). The low wavelength maximum of HnSOR is not identifiable in the accessible spectral window. The signal intensity difference is likely due to quantification error. The conservation of spectral features suggests highly similar secondary structure content in both proteins. In addition, the hydrodynamic diameters as determined by dynamic light scattering were almost identical for both proteins (17.3 ± 1.0 nm for HnSOR and 18.0 ± 0.8 nm for AaSOR), showing that both proteins adopt comparable oligomeric states. HnSOR was ∼20°C less thermostable than the enzyme from the hyperthermophile (Fig. 4B).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

(A) Far-UV circular dichroism spectra of the SOR proteins from Halothiobacillus neapolitanus and Acidianus ambivalens at 0.1 mg/ml protein concentration and 25°C. (B) Thermal unfolding curves for the H. neapolitanus and A. ambivalens SOR, as measured from the CD variation at 220 nm. The lines show sigmoidal fits to the CD data. Values have been offset to facilitate comparison.

3D modeling of the H. neapolitanus SOR.

We performed homology modeling of the HnSOR with the two Acidianus SOR structures as templates (Protein Data Bank [PDB] identifiers 2cb2 and 3bxv) (25, 46) in order to identify features that could give clues to the activity at low temperature and to temperature stability. The results obtained with the H. neapolitanus SOR were reproducible giving similar models, regardless of the modeling server and the template. When the modeled HnSOR subunit was superimposed on each of the templates, the central beta barrel, the nine α-helices (longer than 5 amino acids [aa]) and the active site pocket were almost identical (Fig. 5A). Minor deviations were seen in loop or coil regions. The RMSD of the Cα chain was 0.16 to 0.38 Å.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Three-dimensional modeling results of the HnSOR amino acid sequence with the Acidianus ambivalens SOR (AaSOR; PDB accession number 2cb2) as the template. (A) Cross-eyed stereo view of secondary structure representations of the modeled HnSOR subunit structure (blue) superimposed on AaSOR (gray). The iron atom (Fe) and cysteine persulfide (Css) are shown. The arrows indicate deviations in the coil regions. (B) Side view of the channel at the 4-fold symmetry axis showing two out of four AaSOR subunits (purple and ochre), while the third subunit is replaced by the modeled HnSOR subunit (cyan), including the outer (F141) and inner (F133) phenylalanine rings (AaSOR only), the conserved methionine ring at its base (M130), and valine and leucine residues in the HnSOR. (C) Three copies of the modeled HnSOR subunit aligned to the respective AaSOR subunits (shown in panel D) at the 3-fold symmetry axis showing the channel-forming residues with the distances in angstroms (yellow broken lines and small white numbers) and the putative hydrogen bonds between K97, N227, and E101. (D) Channel at the 3-fold symmetry axis of the AaSOR formed by R99 and S226. Distances are given between the Nη atoms of the arginines (yellow dashes), for the salt bridges to E228 (green dashes), and for the hydrogen bond to the Oγ of the S226 of the neighboring subunit (white dashes). Panel D reprinted from reference 48 with permission of the publisher.

The two Acidianus SORs are built from 24 subunits, each forming a large (15-nm-diameter) hollow sphere with a 432-point group symmetry and an almost impervious surface. The minimal building block is a subunit dimer, so that the holoenzymes represent dodecamers of dimers (45, 46). The dynamic light scattering results suggest that the HnSOR adopts a comparable multimerization state. When two of the modeled HnSOR subunits were docked to each other, a dimer was formed, which could be superimposed on the AaSOR structure with an RMSD of 1.7 Å (not shown).

Narrow pores at the 4-fold and 3-fold symmetry axes of the AaSOR provide entrance to the inner cavity of the sphere (Fig. 5B and D). The question arose whether multimerization of the single subunit might lead to changes in the pore structures of the enzyme. When replacing one of the pore-forming subunits at the 4-fold symmetry axis of the AaSOR with a copy of the modeled HnSOR, changes in the pore structure became apparent. The phenylalanine residue F141 (in AaSOR numbering) was conserved, which forms the outer ring of the two Phe rings. The inner Phe ring was not present due to replacement of F133 with a valine residue (Fig. 5B; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). In consequence, only one of the two access-restricting residues is retained in the HnSOR.

The amino acids R99 and S226 define the pore at the 3-fold symmetry axis of the AaSOR (Fig. 5D). They are connected by hydrogen bonds within and across the subunits. A salt bridge between R99 and E228 of the same subunit also might play a role in stabilization (48). Neither of these residues is conserved in the HnSOR; R99 is replaced by a glutamate (E101), S226 is replaced by A226 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), and E228 is replaced by P228. A226 defines the pore diameter when the modeled HnSOR subunit was aligned to the pore-forming regions of the AaSOR (Fig. 5C). E101 is predicted to form a hydrogen bond to the Nδ2 atom of N227, whereas the Oδ2 atom of the same asparagine could form an H-bond to the Nζ atom of a lysine (K97) of the neighboring subunit.

DISCUSSION

Sources of SORs or sor genes.

Once thought to be restricted to some hyperthermophiles and thermophiles, the sor genes identified in genomes of mesophilic bacteria gave credit to a report by Tano and Imai from 1968 (43) on a SOR-like, glutathione-independent, and sulfur-dismutating enzyme activity in cell extracts of the bacterium Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (formerly Thiobacillus thiooxidans). The sulfur-dismutating enzyme reaction was measured at 30°C in a Warburg apparatus. The products were H2S and thiosulfate. These results were neither repeated nor confirmed, nor was the enzyme ever purified. In contrast, the GSH-dependent sulfur dioxygenases known from other acidithiobacilli represent a different and unrelated type of sulfur-oxidizing enzymes, which remained elusive so far (32, 42). Therefore, the molecular basis of sulfur oxidation in these microorganisms is not known despite their importance in bioleaching and formation of acid mine drainage (3). The preliminary shotgun genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans ATCC 19377 available at GenBank does not contain a sor homologue (GenBank accession number AFOH00000000.1). We chose Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (formerly Thiobacillus neapolitanus) as a representative mesophilic microbe carrying a SOR gene to demonstrate enzyme activity and to study the properties of the protein.

Like the two Acidithiobacillus species (Fig. 1), many but not all of the microorganisms with sor genes are (facultatively) chemolithoautotrophic sulfur oxidizers originating from sulfide or sulfur-rich springs, solfataras, or bioleaching environments. Others would not have been expected to carry a sor gene: for example, Picrophilus torridus is a thermoacidophile described as a strict heterotroph and Desulfomicrobium baculatum (formerly Desulfovibrio baculatus) is, as far as we know, a strictly anaerobic sulfate and sulfur reducer (34, 36). The physiological role of the SOR in these microorganisms is unknown.

HnSOR activity within a broad pH and temperature range.

The HnSOR is active over a broad pH range (pH 5.4 to 11) with an optimum at pH 8.4, when measured at 50°C. Measurements at the optimal temperature at alkaline pH were not possible because of the much higher rates of nonenzymatic sulfur disproportionation. The pH range of the HnSOR extends further into the alkaline region than for any of the SORs characterized so far (Table 1) (4, 20, 30, 41). The pH preference correlates with the slightly alkaline internal pH of H. neapolitanus (pH of ≈7.8) (44). In contrast, the pH optimum of the AaSOR is 7 to 7.4, correlating with an internal pH of around 6.5 (28).

The enzymatic activity of the HnSOR covered a temperature span of almost 90 K, ranging from 10°C to 99°C (Fig. 3), which makes it a thermozyme. Two questions arise from these observations, namely, how the protein maintains its thermostability and how flexibility is retained sufficiently at low temperatures and low substrate concentrations to enable catalysis.

Even though the HnSOR originates from a mesophilic microorganism with an optimal growth temperature around 30°C (maximum 42°C) (17), both oxygenase and reductase activities peaked at 80°C. As a comparison, the SOR from the hyperthermophile Ac. ambivalens (maximal growth temperature of 88°C) was active from 50°C to 108°C (Table 1) (20, 52). Despite the structural similarity between the enzymes from the hyperthermophile and mesophile observed by spectroscopy, the distinct environmental conditions of the organisms result in specific adaptations, including the level of stability and their catalytic properties. High environmental temperatures impose the need for thermostabilization of the enzymes, resulting in a higher rigidity, less flexibility and low or no activity at ambient temperatures (50). However, when the comparison is done at their respective optimal catalytic temperature, the enzymes tend to have identical flexibilities under their particular optimal working conditions so that a “corresponding state” is maintained regarding conformational flexibility (50). The HnSOR is a remarkable exception to this well-established trend. In fact, the specific HnSOR activity exceeded the (hyperthermophilic) AaSOR activity about 10-fold under optimal conditions (20, 45, 48).

The second question to be answered was about the factors that make the HnSOR active at low temperatures. We had observed that the enzyme should be partially melted at the optimal reaction temperature. The apparent thermal stability was about 20 K lower than the AaSOR (Fig. 4B). The results suggest that the HnSOR has a higher flexibility compared to the more rigid AaSOR, which is not active below 50°C (20). The results also suggest that the thermal denaturation is reversible; however, these conclusions have not yet been verified independently by other methods.

In addition, we had shown in a previous study that the widths of the pores at the 4-fold and 3-fold symmetry axes are crucial for specific AaSOR activities: the wider the pores are, the higher the activity becomes (48). In this context, the changes seen in the pores of the outer shell of the HnSOR (Fig. 5B to D) suggest that the barriers are less restrictive: at the 4-fold axis, the inner ring of the two Phe rings is missing. At the 3-fold axis, the salt bridge-forming arginine and glutamate residues are not present, while the H-bond-forming serine is replaced in favor of an alanine. This should be flexible enough to allow easy passage of substrate and/or products. In the HnSOR, a novel and wider hydrogen-bonding network centered at N227 replaced the salt bridges (and the hydrogen bonds provided by S226 [Fig. 5C and D]) that are considered to stabilize subunit interactions and confer rigidity to the 3-fold axis of the AaSOR.

SORs are structurally conserved.

The difference of 40 to 50°C between the maximal or optimal growth temperature and the enzyme activity optimum is much higher than what would have been expected from the overall protein stability. The question of how this came about may be tentatively explained by one (or more) of the following hypotheses. (i) The high optimal temperature of HnSOR is a trait that persisted (e.g., AaSOR) due to lack of evolutionary pressure. (ii) The activity-temperature profile is a consequence of the coupling between enzyme activity and protein structure: any SOR protein will have such a high optimal temperature and intrinsic thermostability. (iii) The existence of HnSOR activity over broad pH and temperature ranges is an adaptive mechanism, which allows metabolic homeostasis upon environmental changes. Comparison of the biochemical properties and the sequences (Table 1; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) suggests that the SORs have similar properties independent of adaptations to the host organism.

We used spectroscopy and a homology modeling approach to make some predictions regarding the reasons for the thermostability and temperature range of the enzyme. The different catalytic properties of HnSOR and AaSOR do not reside in major differences in the secondary structure content. The similar far-UV CD spectra indicated that the overall fold is preserved among enzymes from mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms (Fig. 4A). This interpretation is supported by the modeling results, which showed little changes in the main secondary structure features of the subunit (Fig. 5A). In addition, the oligomeric assembly also seems to be conserved, as noted from the similar hydrodynamic properties of both enzymes. The slightly larger hydrodynamic diameter compared to the diameter obtained by electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography (≈15 nm [20, 25, 45, 46]) reflects the conformational dynamics in solution, the effect of the solvation shell, and the averaging inherent in an ensemble measurement.

SORs feature conserved amino acid sequences regardless whether they originate from mesophilic or hyperthermophilic microorganisms (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Consequently, the basic building blocks are conserved in the available 3D structures and in the models, which includes the central beta barrel with the surrounding alpha helices (PDB identifiers 2cb2 and 3bxv). This suggests that they are core features that make the proteins resistant against thermal melting of the subunits, even if the individual denaturation temperatures might vary (Fig. 4B).

Subunit interactions are another important parameter for thermostability. It has long been known that hollow spheres are intrinsically stable regardless of whether they are macroscopic objects (37), small molecules like fullerenes (23), or large protein complexes like ferritins. Ferritins are intrinsically thermostable and adopt a comparable quaternary structure of 24 subunits in 432-point group symmetry (12, 13, 39). The 24 subunits of SORs are assembled from dimers (45, 46), again a feature similar to ferritins (39). Docking experiments with the modeled subunits showed that dimer formation is feasible. The fit was not optimal but was in good correlation with the template. Taken together, the results suggest that these features—thermostable subunits, dimer formation, and oligomerization to yield the 24-mer—are common and intrinsic properties of the SORs in general (hypothesis ii).

Conclusion.

SORs were once thought to be restricted to some hyperthermophiles and thermophiles, because the enzyme activity had not been recognized in mesophiles with one exception (43). The data presented here showed that the HnSOR possesses folding and quaternary structure properties similar to the SORs from (hyper)thermophiles. However, the activity at low temperatures seems to result from a combination of a less thermostable and more flexible oligomer with less restrictive access. In the context of the limited bioavailability of sulfur at mesophilic temperatures, the basal activity and flexibility of the HnSOR effectively contribute to adequate metabolic flows of sulfur metabolites for the microorganism.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Felicitas Pfeifer (Darmstadt, Germany) for her generosity and encouragement.

A. Veith and A. Kletzin were supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Az Kl885-6/1).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 2 December 2011

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Boden R, et al. 21 August 2011. Phylogenetic assessment of culture collection strains of Thiobacillus thioparus, and definitive 16S rRNA gene sequences for T. thioparus, T. denitrificans, and Halothiobacillus neapolitanus. Arch. Microbiol. doi:10.1007/s00203-011-0747-0 [Epub ahead of print.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brandl H. 2001. Microbial leaching of metals, p 191–224. In Rehm HJ. (ed), Biotechnology, vol 10 Special processes Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chen ZW, Jiang CY, She Q, Liu SJ, Zhou PJ. 2005. Key role of cysteine residues in catalysis and subcellular localization of sulfur oxygenase-reductase of Acidianus tengchongensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:621–628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chen ZW, et al. 2007. Novel bacterial sulfur oxygenase reductases from bioreactors treating gold-bearing concentrates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74:688–698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. 2004. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W96–W99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. DeLano WL. 2002. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 0.97 ed DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Emmel T, Sand W, König WA, Bock E. 1986. Evidence for the existence of a sulfur oxygenase in Sulfolobus brierleyi. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:3415–3420 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fischer DS, Price DC. 1964. Simple serum iron method using new sensitive chromogen tripyridyl-s-triazine. Clin. Chem. 10:21–25 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Friedrich CG, Bardischewsky F, Rother D, Quentmeier A, Fischer J. 2005. Prokaryotic sulfur oxidation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8:253–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. He Z, Li Y, Zhou P, Liu S. 2000. Cloning and heterologous expression of a sulfur oxygenase/reductase gene from the thermoacidophilic archaeon Acidianus sp. S5 in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 193:217–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Janner A. 2008. Comparative architecture of octahedral protein cages. I. Indexed enclosing forms. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 64:494–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Janner A. 2008. Comparative architecture of octahedral protein cages. II. Interplay between structural elements. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 64:503–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Janosch C, et al. 2009. Sulfur oxygenase reductase in different Acidithiobacillus caldus-like strains. Adv. Materials Res. 71–73:239–243 [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kamyshny A. 2009. Solubility of cyclooctasulfur in pure water and sea water at different temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73:6022–6028 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. 2009. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4:363–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kelly DP, Wood AP. 2005. Halothiobacillus, p 58–59. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. (ed), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol 2 Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kelly DP, Wood AP. 2000. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50(Part 2):511–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kletzin A. 2008. Oxidation of sulfur and inorganic sulfur compounds in Acidianus ambivalens, p 184–201. In Dahl C, Friedrich CG. (ed), Microbial sulfur metabolism. Springer, Berlin, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kletzin A. 1989. Coupled enzymatic production of sulfite, thiosulfate, and hydrogen sulfide from sulfur: purification and properties of a sulfur oxygenase reductase from the facultatively anaerobic archaebacterium Desulfurolobus ambivalens. J. Bacteriol. 171:1638–1643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kletzin A. 1992. Molecular characterization of the sor gene, which encodes the sulfur oxygenase reductase of the thermoacidophilic archaeon Desulfurolobus ambivalens. J. Bacteriol. 174:5854–5859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kozakov D, et al. 2010. Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13–19. Proteins 78:3124–3130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kroto HW. 1987. The stability of the fullerenes C-24, C-28, C-32, C-36, C-50, C-60 and C-70. Nature 329:529–531 [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lassmann T, Sonnhammer EL. 2005. Kalign–an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 6:298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li M, et al. 2008. Crystal structure studies on sulfur oxygenase reductase from Acidianus tengchongensis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 369:919–923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mangold S, Valdés J, Holmes D, Dopson M. 2011. Sulfur metabolism in the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus caldus. Front. Microbiol. 2:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. McIlvaine TC. 1921. A buffer solution for colorimetric comparison. J. Biol. Chem. 49:183–186 [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Moll R, Schäfer G. 1988. Chemiosmotic H+ cycling across the plasma membrane of the thermoacidophilic archaebacterium Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. FEBS Lett. 232:359–363 [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Parker CD. 1947. Species of sulphur bacteria associated with the corrosion of concrete. Nature 159:439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Pelletier N, Leroy G, Guiral M, Giudici-Orticoni MT, Aubert C. 2008. First characterisation of the active oligomer form of sulfur oxygenase reductase from the bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. Extremophiles 12:205–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Pettersen EF, et al. 2004. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25:1605–1612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rohwerder T, Sand W. 2003. The sulfane sulfur of persulfides is the actual substrate of the sulfur-oxidizing enzymes from Acidithiobacillus and Acidiphilium spp. Microbiology 149:1699–1710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Roy AB, Trudinger PA. 1970. The chemistry of some sulphur compounds, p 7–29. In Roy AB, Trudinger PA. (ed), The biochemistry of inorganic compounds of sulphur. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Rozanova EP, Nazina TN. 1976. Mesophilic rod-like nonsporeforming bacterium reducing sulfates. Mikrobiologiia 45:825–830 (In Russian.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Schägger H, von Jagow G. 1987. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schleper C, et al. 1995. Picrophilus gen. nov., fam. nov.: a novel aerobic, heterotrophic, thermoacidophilic genus and family comprising archaea capable of growth around pH 0. J. Bacteriol. 177:7050–7059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Schwerin E. 1922. Zur Stabilität der dünnwandigen Hohlkugel unter gleichmäßigem Außendruck. Z. Angew. Math. Mechanik 2:81–91 [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Skerra A. 1994. Use of the tetracycline promoter for the tightly regulated production of a murine antibody fragment in Escherichia coli. Gene 151:131–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Stefanini S, et al. 1996. Thermal stability of horse spleen apoferritin and human recombinant H apoferritin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 325:58–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Steudel R. 2003. Inorganic polysulfanes H2Sn with n > 1. Top. Curr. Chem. 231:99–125 [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sun CW, Chen ZW, He ZG, Zhou PJ, Liu SJ. 2003. Purification and properties of the sulfur oxygenase/reductase from the acidothermophilic archaeon, Acidianus strain S5. Extremophiles 7:131–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Suzuki I. 1965. Oxidation of elemental sulfur by an enzyme system of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 104:359–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tano T, Imai K. 1968. Physiological studies on thiobacilli. Part II. The metabolism of colloidal sulfur by the cell-free enzyme system of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Agric. Biol. Chem. 32:51–54 [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tsai Y, et al. 2007. Structural analysis of CsoS1A and the protein shell of the Halothiobacillus neapolitanus carboxysome. PLoS Biol. 5:e144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Urich T, et al. 2004. The sulphur oxygenase reductase from Acidianus ambivalens is a multimeric protein containing a low-potential mononuclear non-haem iron centre. Biochem. J. 381:137–146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Urich T, Gomes CM, Kletzin A, Frazao C. 2006. X-ray structure of a self-compartmentalizing sulfur cycle metalloenzyme. Science 311:996–1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Urich T, et al. 2005. Identification of core active site residues of the sulfur oxygenase reductase from Acidianus ambivalens by site-directed mutagenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 248:171–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Veith A, et al. 2011. Substrate pathways and mechanisms of inhibition in the sulfur oxygenase reductase of Acidianus ambivalens. Front. Microbiol. 2:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wood AP, Woodall CA, Kelly DP. 2005. Halothiobacillus neapolitanus strain OSWA isolated from “The Old Sulphur Well” at Harrowgate (Yorkshire, England). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 28:746–748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zavodszky P, Kardos J, Svingor Petsko GA. 1998. Adjustment of conformational flexibility is a key event in the thermal adaptation of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:7406–7411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhang Y. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 9:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zillig W, et al. 1986. Desulfurolobus ambivalens gen. nov., sp. nov., an autotrophic archaebacterium facultatively oxidizing and reducing sulfur. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 8:197–203 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES