Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1991 Nov 25;19(22):6087–6092. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.22.6087

Possible role of DNA topoisomerase II on transcription of the homeobox gene Hox-2.1 in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells.

K Ura 1, S Hirose 1
PMCID: PMC329094  PMID: 1683482

Abstract

The Hox-2.1 gene is one of homeobox-containing genes located in the Hox-2 cluster on mouse chromosome 11. In this study, we have examined transcription of the Hox-2.1 gene during differentiation of F9 embryonal carcinoma cells induced by treatment with retinoic acid. The level of Hox-2.1 mRNA increases rapidly after induction of differentiation and then falls. Nuclear run-on experiments demonstrate that the rate of transcription for the Hox-2.1 gene also increases upon differentiation. Treatment of F9 cells with a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide (VP-16) during differentiation blocks the accumulation of Hox-2.1 mRNA. Nuclear run-on analyses reveal that etoposide inhibits transcription of the Hox-2.1 gene during F9 cell differentiation. Measurements of the level of Hox-2.1 mRNA after blocking transcription by actinomycin D show that etoposide does not affect stability of the mRNA. These observations indicate that DNA topoisomerase II is involved in the control of Hox-2.1 gene transcription.

Full text

PDF
6087

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adachi Y., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold-associated regions. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):3997–4006. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akam M. Hox and HOM: homologous gene clusters in insects and vertebrates. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):347–349. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90909-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berstine E. G., Hooper M. L., Grandchamp S., Ephrussi B. Alkaline phosphatase activity in mouse teratoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3899–3903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breier G., Bućan M., Francke U., Colberg-Poley A. M., Gruss P. Sequential expression of murine homeo box genes during F9 EC cell differentiation. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2209–2215. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04486.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen G. L., Yang L., Rowe T. C., Halligan B. D., Tewey K. M., Liu L. F. Nonintercalative antitumor drugs interfere with the breakage-reunion reaction of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. J Biol Chem. 1984 Nov 10;259(21):13560–13566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Curran T., Peters G., Van Beveren C., Teich N. M., Verma I. M. FBJ murine osteosarcoma virus: identification and molecular cloning of biologically active proviral DNA. J Virol. 1982 Nov;44(2):674–682. doi: 10.1128/jvi.44.2.674-682.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dunaway M. Inhibition of topoisomerase II does not inhibit transcription of RNA polymerase I and II genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2893–2900. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fibi M., Zink B., Kessel M., Colberg-Poley A. M., Labeit S., Lehrach H., Gruss P. Coding sequence and expression of the homeobox gene Hox 1.3. Development. 1988 Feb;102(2):349–359. doi: 10.1242/dev.102.2.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90877-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gehring W. J. The homeo box: a key to the understanding of development? Cell. 1985 Jan;40(1):3–5. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90300-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Krumlauf R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):367–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Lorimer J., McVey J. H., Tuddenham E. G., Krumlauf R. Characterization of a murine homeo box gene, Hox-2.6, related to the Drosophila Deformed gene. Genes Dev. 1988 Nov;2(11):1424–1438. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.11.1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grunstein M. Nucleosomes: regulators of transcription. Trends Genet. 1990 Dec;6(12):395–400. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90299-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirose S., Ohta T. DNA supercoiling and eukaryotic transcription--cause and effect. Cell Struct Funct. 1990 Jun;15(3):133–135. doi: 10.1247/csf.15.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirose S., Suzuki Y. In vitro transcription of eukaryotic genes is affected differently by the degree of DNA supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(3):718–722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.3.718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kessel M., Gruss P. Murine developmental control genes. Science. 1990 Jul 27;249(4967):374–379. doi: 10.1126/science.1974085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Krumlauf R., Holland P. W., McVey J. H., Hogan B. L. Developmental and spatial patterns of expression of the mouse homeobox gene, Hox 2.1. Development. 1987 Apr;99(4):603–617. doi: 10.1242/dev.99.4.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuribayashi K., Hikata M., Hiraoka O., Miyamoto C., Furuichi Y. A rapid and efficient purification of poly(A)-mRNA by oligo(dT)30-Latex. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1988;(19):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Miki K., Sugimoto E., Kitagawa Y. Reversible interconversion between primitive endoderm- and parietal endoderm-like F9 cells demonstrated by mRNAs expression. J Biochem. 1987 Aug;102(2):385–392. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mizutani M., Ohta T., Watanabe H., Handa H., Hirose S. Negative supercoiling of DNA facilitates an interaction between transcription factor IID and the fibroin gene promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 1;88(3):718–722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.3.718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy S. P., Garbern J., Odenwald W. F., Lazzarini R. A., Linney E. Differential expression of the homeobox gene Hox-1.3 in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5587–5591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nelson E. M., Tewey K. M., Liu L. F. Mechanism of antitumor drug action: poisoning of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II on DNA by 4'-(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1361–1365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ohta T., Hirose S. Purification of a DNA supercoiling factor from the posterior silk gland of Bombyx mori. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5307–5311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simeone A., Acampora D., Arcioni L., Andrews P. W., Boncinelli E., Mavilio F. Sequential activation of HOX2 homeobox genes by retinoic acid in human embryonal carcinoma cells. Nature. 1990 Aug 23;346(6286):763–766. doi: 10.1038/346763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sperry A. O., Blasquez V. C., Garrard W. T. Dysfunction of chromosomal loop attachment sites: illegitimate recombination linked to matrix association regions and topoisomerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5497–5501. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Strickland S. Mouse teratocarcinoma cells: prospects for the study of embryogenesis and neoplasia. Cell. 1981 May;24(2):277–278. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tabuchi H., Hirose S. DNA supercoiling facilitates formation of the transcription initiation complex on the fibroin gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 1988 Oct 25;263(30):15282–15287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thomas P. S. Hybridization of denatured RNA transferred or dotted nitrocellulose paper. Methods Enzymol. 1983;100:255–266. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)00060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tokunaga K., Taniguchi H., Yoda K., Shimizu M., Sakiyama S. Nucleotide sequence of a full-length cDNA for mouse cytoskeletal beta-actin mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Mar 25;14(6):2829–2829. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.6.2829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang S. Y., LaRosa G. J., Gudas L. J. Molecular cloning of gene sequences transcriptionally regulated by retinoic acid and dibutyryl cyclic AMP in cultured mouse teratocarcinoma cells. Dev Biol. 1985 Jan;107(1):75–86. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90377-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu H. Y., Shyy S. H., Wang J. C., Liu L. F. Transcription generates positively and negatively supercoiled domains in the template. Cell. 1988 May 6;53(3):433–440. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES