Abstract
Nine of 11 hematological patients with disseminated/deep-seated Fusarium infection tested at least twice for Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) had repeated positive results in the absence of Aspergillus isolation in culture. The centrifuged supernatants of 12 Fusarium isolates were tested by a GM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). All the isolates produced positive reactions when tested undiluted. These results show cross-reactivity of Fusarium spp. with Aspergillus GM that may constitute a drawback with respect to the specificity of the Platelia EIA.
TEXT
Fusarium is a large genus of hyaline filamentous molds that have emerged as pathogen of immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. While Fusarium infections, such as onychomycosis, peritonitis in association with peritoneal dialysis, and keratitis as a consequence of corneal trauma or contact lens wear, in immunocompetent patients tend to be superficial or locally invasive, disseminated Fusarium infection remains an uncommon and yet severe opportunistic infection among highly immunocompromised patients (9). The European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) recently launched a survey on this infection in Europe.
The treatment of Fusarium infection in immunocompromised hosts is a frustrating task due to the limited susceptibility of Fusarium species to antifungal agents. Most of the species have shown in vitro resistance to azoles, polyenes, and echinocandins; numerous experimental studies in animals carried out to evaluate different antifungal treatments have had disappointing results, and a favorable outcome was found in less than 50% of the cases (5, 7, 9, 14, 15, 19).
The detection of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) is now included among the microbiological criteria of the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) classification of invasive aspergillosis (2). The clinical sensitivity of GM EIA is variable, ranging from 29% to 100% according to the host group and the underlying pathological processes (13). A major problem is the occurrence of false-positive results related in some cases to cross-reactivity with other fungi. The epitope detected by the EB-A2 monoclonal antibody employed in the EIA is not exclusively present in Aspergillus species. This epitope is contained also in antigens of other molds, including Penicillium, Paecilomyces, Trichothecium, Geotrichum, and Myceliophthora, of dimorphic fungi, such as Blastomyces dermatitidis and Histoplasma capsulatum, and also of yeasts (1, 3, 4, 8, 20, 21). Cross-reactivity of Fusarium spp. in the GM assay is controversial and seems to be related to the method used and the tested species (1, 6, 17). While cross-reactivity of F. oxysporum was found using Pastorex Aspergillus antigen latex agglutination but not using the Platelia test (1, 6, 16), F. solani was reported to lack cross-reactivity in both the assays (1, 6, 16).
The aims of the present study were to check GM index results in patients with disseminated Fusarium infection included in the ECMM survey conducted in Italy by the Federazione Italiana di Micopatologia Umana e Animale (FIMUA) and to test the cross-reactivity of different Fusarium spp. in the GM EIA.
Aspergillus GM index results of patients with Fusarium disseminated or deep-seated infection notified during the ECMM-FIMUA survey were checked in the microbiological database.
A total of 12 Fusarium isolates—2 F. oxysporum, 3 F. proliferatum, 3 F. verticillioides, and 4 F. solani species complex (FSSC), namely, 1 F. falciforme and 3 F. sp. cucurbitae MPV—identified by sequencing the elongation factor 1α gene (10, 11, 12) were studied. Seven isolates were from the patients included in the study. The other five, namely, four isolates from blood and one from a skin biopsy specimen, were from patients not included in this study, and the GM test was not performed for these patients. One Aspergillus fumigatus isolate was used as a control.
The isolates were grown on Potato dextrose agar for 72 h at room temperature. A loop of biomass was transferred in 50 ml of Sabouraud broth and incubated in the dark at room temperature on a rotary shaker (20 rpm). After 72 h at room temperature, 15 ml of the supernatant was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 5 min. The centrifuged supernatants (undiluted and diluted 1:100) were tested twice by Platelia Aspergillus EIA (Bio-Rad, Marne La Coquette, France).
Eleven patients were tested at least twice for GM (Table 1). Eight with hematological malignancy had proven disseminated Fusarium infection, documented by isolation of the fungus from blood or by the presence of hyphae at histology of a skin biopsy specimen combined with growth of Fusarium in culture. Another three neutropenic patients had probable infections according to the EORTC/MSG criteria, as hyphae were seen by direct microscopy of respiratory tract samples or pleural fluid and Fusarium spp. were isolated in culture. Nine of these 11 patients had repeated positive GM test results, with an index ranging from 0.50 to 7.7 in the absence of isolation of Aspergillus spp. in culture of bronchial secretions or of other respiratory tract specimens (Table 1).
Table 1.
Patient | Sex | Age (yr) | Predisposing factor(s) | Fusarium infecting isolate | Positive biological sample(s) | Serum GM index range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 29 | Allo-HSCT | F. oxysporum | Pleural fluid | 0.69–0.90 |
2 | M | 63 | Leukemia | F. oxysporum | Bronchial secretions | 1.40–2.30 |
3 | M | 55 | AML | F. proliferatum | Blood | 0.89–0.86 |
4 | F | 61 | Allo-HSCT | F. proliferatum | Blood | 1.37–2.33 |
5 | F | 56 | AML, allo-HSCT | F. proliferatum | Blood | 0.7–2.15 |
6 | M | 8 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | F. proliferatum | Blood | 0.53–7.7 |
7 | M | 19 | ALL, auto-HSCT | F. proliferatum | Blood | 0.54–1.45 |
8 | F | 57 | Postchemotherapy aplasia, RAEB | FSSC | Purulent nasal discharge | 0.50–0.60 |
9 | M | 41 | Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, allo-HSCT | F. verticillioides | Skin biopsy | Negative |
10 | M | 5 | ALL | F. verticillioides | Blood | Negative |
11 | F | 9 | ALL, auto-HSCT | F. verticillioides | Blood | 0.70–4.16 |
M, male; F, female; allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; auto-HSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; FSSC, Fusarium solani species complex.
The means of the indices of reactivity in the Platelia assay of fungal cultures are reported in Table 2. All the Fusarium isolates produced positive reactions (index ≥ 0.5) when tested undiluted. The highest values (approximately 4) were detected in two FSSC isolates, one of which (F. falciforme) tested positive (0.55) also at the 1:100 dilution. The A. fumigatus isolate, tested as a control, showed a positive GM index when tested undiluted and diluted 1:100.
Table 2.
IUM isolatea | Patient (source) | Fusarium sp. | Index of reactivity in Platelia assay |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Undiluted reaction mixture | Reaction mixture diluted 10−2 | |||
07-0123 | 1 (pleural fluid) | F. oxysporum | 2.35 | 0.25 |
09-1022 | 2 (bronchial secretions) | F. oxysporum | 1.68 | 0.30 |
10-0049 | 4 (blood) | F. proliferatum | 2.48 | 0.24 |
09-0505 | 3 (blood) | F. proliferatum | 1.49 | 0.35 |
09-0782 | 7 (blood) | F. proliferatum | 2.04 | 0.37 |
10-0035 | (blood) | F. sp. cucurbitae MPV | 2.05 | 0.18 |
10-0036 | (blood) | F. sp. cucurbitae MPV | 2.50 | 0.42 |
07-0259 | (blood) | F. sp. cucurbitae MPV | 3.97 | 0.36 |
08-0221 | (skin biopsy) | F. falciforme | 4.14 | 0.55 |
09-0620 | (blood) | F. verticillioides | 1.84 | 0.38 |
09-0780 | 10 (blood) | F. verticillioides | 1.15 | 0.22 |
09-0781 | 11 (blood) | F. verticillioides | 1.82 | 0.22 |
11-0088 | A. fumigatus | 6.05 | 1.72 |
IUM, Igiene Università Milano culture collection.
Monitoring of GM serum levels is currently used for early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis due to its standardization and simple application in routine practice. The reported values of sensitivity and specificity of the Platelia Aspergillus assay differ widely in the literature. A 93% specificity for proven and probable cases was reported in a meta-analysis (13), whereas a low level of specificity is reported in some experiences (18).
Among the different causes of false-positive results, including the use of antibiotics such as piperacillin and amoxicillin, infections caused by mold containing cross-reactive GM have been reported. Cross-reactivity with antigens released by a large number of fungi has been reported in the literature (1, 3, 4, 8, 20, 21). Test specificity with exoantigens of Fusarium cultures is controversial (1, 6, 16).
Positive GM test results for patients with Fusarium infection have been anecdotally reported in the literature (18). In our survey, 9 out of 11 patients with disseminated or deep-seated Fusarium infection had repeated positive GM test results in the absence of isolation of Aspergillus spp.
To verify the hypothesis that a cross-reaction with exoantigens released by Fusarium might be the cause of Aspergillus GM positivity, we tested 12 Fusarium isolates, representing the species that most frequently cause infection, for their reactivity in the Platelia Aspergillus assay. All the Fusarium tested isolates showed positive indices of reactivity, even if lower than that shown by the A. fumigatus isolate used as control. The reactivity indices of Fusarium cultures ranged from 1.15 (F. verticillioides) to 4.14 (F. falciforme).
Our cases as well as in vitro studies show that Fusarium exoantigens may be cross-reactive in the Platelia Aspergillus assay. Therefore, a positive GM test in an immunocompromised host may represent invasive aspergillosis or another fungal infection, including Fusarium etiology. On the other hand, this unexpected reactivity of the test could be considered a useful diagnostic and prognostic tool in the management of Fusarium infections, as no antigen system for detection of this fungal infection exits.
In conclusion, these results show cross-reactivity of Fusarium spp. with Aspergillus GM that may constitute a drawback with respect to the specificity of the EIA. Therefore, a positive GM result, as with the presence of septate acute-angle branching hyphae in tissue and a positive β-d-glucan test, cannot help medical practitioners reach a specific diagnosis. This may represent a crucial point for the choice of antifungal therapy and for the evaluation of treatment outcome of the use of antifungals, such as echinocandins, that have been shown to be inactive in vitro against all Fusarium spp.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 28 December 2011
REFERENCES
- 1. Cummings JR, et al. 2007. Cross-reactivity of non-fungal species in the Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 59:113–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. De Pauw B, et al. 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1813–1821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fekkar A, et al. 2009. Serum cross-reactivity with Aspergillus galactomannan and cryptococcal antigen during fatal disseminated Trichosporon dermatis infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1457–1458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Giacchino M, et al. 2006. Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cross-reactivity caused by invasive Geotrichum capitatum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3432–3434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Guarro J. 2011. Lessons from animal studies for the treatment of invasive human infections due to uncommon fungi. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66:1447–1466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kappe R, Schulzeberge A. 1993. New cause for false-positive results with the Pastorex Aspergillus antigen latex agglutination-test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2489–2490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lortholary O, et al. 2010. International retrospective analysis of 73 cases of invasive fusariosis treated with voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4446–4450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Morio F, et al. 2011. Invasive Myceliophthora thermophila infection mimicking invasive aspergillosis in a neutropenic patient: a new cause of cross-reactivity with the Aspergillus galactomannan serum antigen assay. Med. Mycol. 49:883–886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nucci M, Anaissie E. 2007. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20:695–704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. O'Donnell K, Kistler HC, Cigelnik E, Ploetz RC. 1998. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:2044–2049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. O'Donnell K, et al. 2008. Molecular phylogenetic diversity, multilocus haplotype nomenclature, and in vitro antifungal resistance within the Fusarium solani species complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2477–2490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. O'Donnell K, et al. 2010. Internet-accessible DNA sequence database for identifying Fusaria from human and animal infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3708–3718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pfeiffer CD, Fine JP, Safdar N. 2006. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using a galactomannan assay: a meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42:1417–1427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Raad II, et al. 2006. Posaconazole as salvage treatment for invasive fusariosis in patients with underlying hematologic malignancy and other conditions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42:1398–1403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Spellberg B, et al. 2006. Comparison of antifungal treatments for murine fusariosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:973–979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Stynen D, et al. 1992. Rat monoclonal antibodies against Aspergillus galactomannan. Infect. Immun. 60:2237–2245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Swanink CMA, Meis J, Rijs A, Donnelly JP, Verweij PE. 1997. Specificity of a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:257–260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tanriover MD, Ascioglu S, Altun B, Uzun O. 2010. Galactomannan on the stage: prospective evaluation of the applicability in routine practice and surveillance. Mycoses 53:16–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tortorano AM, et al. 2008. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of 75 clinical isolates of Fusarium spp. from northern Italy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2683–2685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wheat LJ, et al. 2007. Histoplasmosis-associated cross-reactivity in the BioRad Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 14:638–640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Xavier MO, Pasqualotto AC, Cardoso ICE, Severo LC. 2009. Cross-reactivity of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Cryptococcus species in the commercial Platelia Aspergillus Enzyme Immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16:132–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]