Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1990 Jul 11;18(13):3713–3722. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3713

Supragenic loop organization: mapping in Drosophila embryos, of scaffold-associated regions on a 800 kilobase DNA continuum cloned from the 14B-15B first chromosome region.

P Surdej 1, C Got 1, R Rosset 1, R Miassod 1
PMCID: PMC331069  PMID: 2374707

Abstract

The supragenic loop organization of the Drosophila genome was investigated on a 800 kilobase (kb) DNA continuum from the 14B-15B first chromosome region. Nuclear scaffolds from 0-18 hr embryos were prepared with Laemmli's low-salt, detergent procedure and digested with restriction enzymes. Scaffold-associated regions (SARs) were mapped by probing Southern transfers of total, scaffold-associated and free DNA with a set of 70 recombinant phages overlapping the investigated genomic region. In all, 85 restriction fragments showed association to scaffolds. 12 of them were present in the majority of scaffolds. They bore strong SARs organizing the DNA molecule as consecutive loops with sizes ranging from 15 to 115 kb. 44 were present in only a fraction of scaffolds. They contained weak SARs subdividing the basic loops into smaller ones. 29 additional restriction fragments were present in a very small fraction of scaffolds. The position of SARs with respect to transcribed regions was investigated. Strong SARs appeared to be located on untranscribed DNA and to frame transcription units. In contrast, at least some weak SARs were shown to comap with transcribed regions or to reside within characterized transcription units. Statistical analyses established that strong and weak SARs were periodically positioned on the DNA continuum and that there was a potential contact point between scaffolds and the DNA continuum every 11 kb, or multiples thereof. Implications for SAR role(s) are discussed.

Full text

PDF
3715

Images in this article

3715Image
on p.3715
3715Image
on p.3715
3716Image
on p.3716
3716Image
on p.3716
3717Image
on p.3717

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adachi Y., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold-associated regions. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):3997–4006. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amati B. B., Gasser S. M. Chromosomal ARS and CEN elements bind specifically to the yeast nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1988 Sep 23;54(7):967–978. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90111-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bode J., Maass K. Chromatin domain surrounding the human interferon-beta gene as defined by scaffold-attached regions. Biochemistry. 1988 Jun 28;27(13):4706–4711. doi: 10.1021/bi00413a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown N. H., King D. L., Wilcox M., Kafatos F. C. Developmentally regulated alternative splicing of Drosophila integrin PS2 alpha transcripts. Cell. 1989 Oct 6;59(1):185–195. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90880-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buongiorno-Nardelli M., Micheli G., Carri M. T., Marilley M. A relationship between replicon size and supercoiled loop domains in the eukaryotic genome. Nature. 1982 Jul 1;298(5869):100–102. doi: 10.1038/298100a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Citri Y., Colot H. V., Jacquier A. C., Yu Q., Hall J. C., Baltimore D., Rosbash M. A family of unusually spliced biologically active transcripts encoded by a Drosophila clock gene. Nature. 1987 Mar 5;326(6108):42–47. doi: 10.1038/326042a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage sites appear to be evolutionarily conserved. FEBS Lett. 1986 Aug 11;204(1):5–7. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)81377-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cockerill P. N., Yuen M. H., Garrard W. T. The enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is flanked by presumptive chromosomal loop anchorage elements. J Biol Chem. 1987 Apr 15;262(11):5394–5397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook P. R. The nucleoskeleton: artefact, passive framework or active site? J Cell Sci. 1988 May;90(Pt 1):1–6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.90.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Delidakis C., Kafatos F. C. Amplification of a chorion gene cluster in Drosophila is subject to multiple cis-regulatory elements and to long-range position effects. J Mol Biol. 1987 Sep 5;197(1):11–26. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90605-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Digan M. E., Haynes S. R., Mozer B. A., Dawid I. B., Forquignon F., Gans M. Genetic and molecular analysis of fs(1)h, a maternal effect homeotic gene in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1986 Mar;114(1):161–169. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90392-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dijkwel P. A., Hamlin J. L. Matrix attachment regions are positioned near replication initiation sites, genes, and an interamplicon junction in the amplified dihydrofolate reductase domain of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5398–5409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. "A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity". Addendum. Anal Biochem. 1984 Feb;137(1):266–267. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Freund J. N., Zerges W., Schedl P., Jarry B. P., Vergis W. Molecular organization of the rudimentary gene of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):25–36. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90378-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1986 Aug 15;46(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90877-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greaves D. R., Wilson F. D., Lang G., Kioussis D. Human CD2 3'-flanking sequences confer high-level, T cell-specific, position-independent gene expression in transgenic mice. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):979–986. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90631-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grosveld F., van Assendelft G. B., Greaves D. R., Kollias G. Position-independent, high-level expression of the human beta-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):975–985. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90584-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Handeli S., Klar A., Meuth M., Cedar H. Mapping replication units in animal cells. Cell. 1989 Jun 16;57(6):909–920. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90329-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hiromi Y., Kuroiwa A., Gehring W. J. Control elements of the Drosophila segmentation gene fushi tarazu. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):603–613. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Izaurralde E., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Highly preferential nucleation of histone H1 assembly on scaffold-associated regions. J Mol Biol. 1989 Dec 5;210(3):573–585. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90133-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Izaurralde E., Mirkovitch J., Laemmli U. K. Interaction of DNA with nuclear scaffolds in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 5;200(1):111–125. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90337-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jarman A. P., Higgs D. R. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3337–3344. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03205.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Käs E., Chasin L. A. Anchorage of the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase gene to the nuclear scaffold occurs in an intragenic region. J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 20;198(4):677–692. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Loc P. V., Strätling W. H. The matrix attachment regions of the chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J. 1988 Mar;7(3):655–664. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02860.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Loughney K., Kreber R., Ganetzky B. Molecular analysis of the para locus, a sodium channel gene in Drosophila. Cell. 1989 Sep 22;58(6):1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90512-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Marilley M., Gassend-Bonnet G. Supercoiled loop organization of genomic DNA: a close relationship between loop domains, expression units, and replicon organization in rDNA from Xenopus laevis. Exp Cell Res. 1989 Feb;180(2):475–489. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McNabb S. L., Beckendorf S. K. Cis-acting sequences which regulate expression of the Sgs-4 glue protein gene of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2331–2340. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04501.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mirkovitch J., Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. Scaffold attachment of DNA loops in metaphase chromosomes. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 5;200(1):101–109. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90336-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mirkovitch J., Spierer P., Laemmli U. K. Genes and loops in 320,000 base-pairs of the Drosophila melanogaster chromosome. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jul 20;190(2):255–258. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90296-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Newport J. Nuclear reconstitution in vitro: stages of assembly around protein-free DNA. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shermoen A. W., Beckendorf S. K. A complex of interacting DNAase I-hypersensitive sites near the Drosophila glue protein gene, Sgs4. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):601–607. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90176-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Surdej P., Got C., Miassod R. Developmental expression pattern of a 800 kb DNA continuum cloned from the Drosophila X chromosome 14B-15B region. Biol Cell. 1990;68(2):105–118. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(90)90295-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sykes R. C., Lin D., Hwang S. J., Framson P. E., Chinault A. C. Yeast ARS function and nuclear matrix association coincide in a short sequence from the human HPRT locus. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 May;212(2):301–309. doi: 10.1007/BF00334700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES