Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2012 Mar 8;287(18):15134–15142. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.328153

Principal Role of the Arginine Finger in Rotary Catalysis of F1-ATPase*

Yoshihito Komoriya , Takayuki Ariga §, Ryota Iino , Hiromi Imamura , Daichi Okuno , Hiroyuki Noji ¶,1
PMCID: PMC3340237  PMID: 22403407

Background: The role of arginine finger of F1-ATPase in acceleration of hydrolysis and cooperativity is controversial.

Results: An arginine finger mutant (αR364K) of thermophilic Bacillus PS3 F1-ATPase showed slow, successive, unidirectional rotations with tight chemomechanical coupling.

Conclusion: The arginine finger of F1-ATPase accelerates ATP hydrolysis and is dispensable for cooperativity.

Significance: The arginine finger is involved in the rotary catalysis of F1-ATPase.

Keywords: Bioenergetics, Biophysics, F1Fo ATPase, Microscopic Imaging, Molecular Motors, Single Molecule Biophysics, ADP-inhibition, Arginine Finger, F1-ATPase, Multisite Catalysis

Abstract

F1-ATPase (F1) is an ATP-driven rotary motor wherein the γ subunit rotates against the surrounding α3β3 stator ring. The 3 catalytic sites of F1 reside on the interface of the α and β subunits of the α3β3 ring. While the catalytic residues predominantly reside on the β subunit, the α subunit has 1 catalytically critical arginine, termed the arginine finger, with stereogeometric similarities with the arginine finger of G-protein-activating proteins. However, the principal role of the arginine finger of F1 remains controversial. We studied the role of the arginine finger by analyzing the rotation of a mutant F1 with a lysine substitution of the arginine finger. The mutant showed a 350-fold longer catalytic pause than the wild-type; this pause was further lengthened by the slowly hydrolyzed ATP analog ATPγS. On the other hand, the mutant F1 showed highly unidirectional rotation with a coupling ratio of 3 ATPs/turn, the same as wild-type, suggesting that cooperative torque generation by the 3 β subunits was not impaired. The hybrid F1 carrying a single copy of the α mutant revealed that the reaction step slowed by the mutation occurs at +200° from the binding angle of the mutant subunit. Thus, the principal role of the arginine finger is not to mediate cooperativity among the catalytic sites, but to enhance the rate of the ATP cleavage by stabilizing the transition state of ATP hydrolysis. Lysine substitution also caused frequent pauses because of severe ADP inhibition, and a slight decrease in ATP-binding rate.

Introduction

F1-ATPase (F1)2 is a water-soluble portion of the FoF1-ATP synthase, and a rotary motor protein driven by ATP hydrolysis (15). Bacterial F1 is composed of α, β, γ, δ, and ϵ subunits with a stoichiometry of 3:3:1:1:1. The minimum complex that functions as a rotary motor is the α3β3γ subcomplex. Three β subunits and 3 α subunits form the stator ring, in which these subunits are alternately arranged. The rotary shaft, namely, the γ subunit, is accommodated in the central cavity of the α3β3 stator ring. The catalytic reaction centers are located at the α/β interfaces. Although most of the residues forming the catalytic site are on the β subunits, the α subunits contain 1 catalytically critical and well-conserved arginine residue, termed the arginine finger, which is the focus of the present study.

The rotation of F1 can be visualized by optical microscopy (69). The γ subunit of F1, from various species studied to date, rotates in a counterclockwise direction. The unidirectionality of the rotation is supported by the intrinsic cooperative torque generation of the 3 β subunits (10). The step size of the rotation is 120°, each coupled with single turnover of ATP hydrolysis (8). The 120° step is further divided into 80° and 40° substeps. The 80° substep is triggered by ATP binding and ADP release, each of which occurs on different β subunits. The 40° substep is initiated by ATP hydrolysis and release of inorganic phosphate (Pi), which also occurs on different β subunits. The angular positions of the dwell before the 80° and 40° substeps are referred to as the ATP-binding (ATP-waiting) angle and the catalytic angle, respectively. The basic reaction scheme for the rotation and catalysis of F1 has been recently established (11), although several uncertainties do remain (12). Each β subunit binds to ATP when the γ subunit is oriented at a specific angle, and the binding angles for the individual β subunits differ by 120°. Each β subunit catalyzes ATP hydrolysis at 200° from its ATP-binding angle (13). Subsequently, ADP and Pi are released at 240° (14) and 320° (11), respectively. When the γ subunit returns to the original position, the β subunits initiate the next round of catalysis by binding to a new ATP.

The crystal structure of F1 reveals the structural basis of the chemomechanical coupling of F1 (15). The 3 β subunits have distinct ligand-bound states and conformations: one β is bound to an ATP analog, AMP-PNP; a second is bound to ADP and azide (16); and the third binds to none. These 3 states of β are referred to as βTP, βDP, and βempty, respectively. A cross-linking experiment in a single-molecule rotation assay established that the crystal structure represents the catalytic dwell state (17), and that βTP, βDP, and βempty represent the 80°, 200°, and 320° states of the above mentioned reaction scheme, respectively (18). Both the βTP and βDP states assume a closed conformation in which the C-terminal domain rotates inward toward the γ subunit and enclose the bound nucleotide. On the other hand, βempty assumes an open conformation by the outward rotation of the C-terminal domain. Therefore, the widely accepted view is that the β subunit undergoes a conformational transition between the open and closed states during nucleotide binding/dissociation, inducing unidirectional rotation of the central γ subunit (19, 20).

The βTP and βDP conformations closely resemble each other. Both β subunits bind to the ATP analog MgADP-BeF3 (21) or the transition state analog MgADP-AlF4 (22), simultaneously. A recent single-molecule experiment has indicated that βDP is the catalytically active state for ATP cleavage (18). The conformations of the catalytic sites on βTP and βDP are different at the α/β interfaces. βTP forms a relatively open interface with the neighboring α subunit (αTP), whereas βDP forms a closed interface with αDP, suggesting this is the highest affinity site. However, based on nucleotide titration experiments, it was shown that βTP has the highest affinity for nucleotide (23). This positional rearrangement of the α subunit induces proximity of the well-conserved arginine residue to the β- and γ-phosphates of the bound ATP (Fig. 1). The stereogeometric position of this arginine residue is similar to that of the catalytically crucial arginine residue found in the α subunit of trimeric G-proteins and in GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for small G-proteins (15, 24, 25). The latter is termed the “arginine finger,” and upon binding to small G-proteins, GAPs present this residue to the β- and γ-phosphate of bound GTP, and remarkably accelerate their hydrolysis by stabilizing the transition state.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Crystal structure of MF1 viewed from the side, αDPDP catalytic interface (PDB code: 1W0J). The α, β, and γ subunits are shown in yellow, green, and gray, respectively. The “arginine finger” in the α subunit (αR373 in MF1) is shown by red space-filling model. ADP, BeF3, and magnesium ion bound to the catalytic site are shown by blue, cyan, and purple space-filling models, respectively. The arginine finger of TF1, αR364, was mutated into lysine (αR364K) in this study.

In a genetic screen, the conserved arginine of Escherichia coli F1 (EF1) was originally found to be one of the catalytically important residues on the α subunit (26). Biochemical studies then confirmed a critical role for this arginine (2629). In particular, a nucleotide titration study with a transition state analog, MgADP-fluoroaluminate, showed that this arginine stabilizes the transition state of hydrolysis and accelerates the rate of hydrolysis (28). Several theoretical studies also support the view that this arginine contributes to lowering the energy level of the post-hydrolysis state compared with the pre-hydrolysis state (30, 31). A crystal structure of mitochondrial F1 (MF1) revealed that the guanidinium group of the arginine finger is positioned at 1 Å closer to the β-phosphate in the βDP than that in the βTP (Fig. 1) (21). This positional rearrangement is proposed to initiate ATP hydrolysis. The arginine finger of EF1 is αR376, and corresponds to αR373 in MF1 and αR364 in the thermophilic Bacillus PS3 F1 (TF1).

The cysteine mutant of the arginine finger of F1 was severely impaired in multisite catalysis (26), which is the highly active mode where 3 catalytic sites sequentially hydrolyze ATP to reach the maximum hydrolysis rate. However, this mutation only slightly impaired unisite catalysis, a slow catalysis mode of F1 that proceeds only when one of the catalytic sites is occupied by a nucleotide and the others are unoccupied. Unisite catalysis is considered indicative of the intrinsic catalytic ability of F1 that is independent of the allosteric interactions with other catalytic sites. Subsequent biochemical research showed that alanine or lysine mutations of the arginine finger also caused almost complete loss of multisite catalysis (by a factor of 103), although unisite catalysis was not affected (27). From these observations, it was concluded that the arginine finger is not directly involved in the enhancement of ATP hydrolysis rate of F1, but it has a critical role in mediating cooperativity among the 3 catalytic sites to facilitate multisite catalysis.

Thus, although the importance of the arginine finger in catalysis is well recognized, its principal role is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the role of the arginine finger of TF1 by analyzing the rotational behavior of the lysine mutant. This allowed us to elucidate the impact of this mutation on the intrinsic catalytic power and the efficiency of allosteric cooperative communication among the catalytic sites of F1.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Preparation of Proteins

The expression plasmid for the mutant α3β3γ subcomplex of F1-ATPase (α3β3γ subcomplex was referred to as F1 in this study) was generated using conventional gene manipulation techniques. The α(His6 at N terminus/C193S)3β(His10 at N terminus)3γ(S108C/I211C) subcomplex of F1 from the thermophilic Bacillus PS3, which was modified for the rotation assay, and the α(His6 at N terminus/C193S/R364K)3β(His10 at N terminus)3γ(S108C/I211C) subcomplex were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and biotinylated as described previously (32). For simplicity, the former was referred to as wild-type F1 because the effect of the mutations on the hydrolysis of ATP was minor, and the latter was referred to as F1(αR364K). Proteins used for preparation of hybrid F1, α(C193S)3β3γ(S108C/I211C) subcomplex and monomer α(His6 at N terminus/C193S/R364K), were prepared as described previously (13). The former and latter are referred to as the His tag-less wild-type F1 and α(R364K), respectively.

Depletion of ADP Bound to F1

The ADP tightly bound to purified F1 was removed by a method described previously (33), with modification. EDTA in the buffer solution for the purified F1 was removed by exchanging with another buffer (50 mm 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES)-KOH, 50 mm NaCl, pH 8.0) by using a PD10 column (GE Healthcare). Then, calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (Wako, Japan) was added to the F1 solution (140 units of alkaline phosphatase per 1 mg of F1) and incubated overnight at room temperature. Tightly bound ADP is released into the medium at a slow rate and is re-bound at a fast rate. Alkaline phosphatase cleaves released ADP to AMP, and then, to adenosine. Therefore, alkaline phosphatase promotes the removal of bound ADP from F1. After incubation, F1 was separated from calf intestine alkaline phosphatase and adenosine by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 10/300 GL; GE Healthcare) for use in experiments. The ATP hydrolysis activity of the wild-type F1 and F1(αR364K) was measured with an ATP-regenerating system at 25 ± 2 °C (18).

Rotation Assay of F1(αR364K)

The rotation assays of F1(αR364K) was carried out as described previously (18). A streptavidin-coated magnetic bead (<0.3 μm) was prepared from a commercially available one with large variations in size (nominal diameter = 0.76 μm; Thermo Scientific). The original magnetic bead suspension was sonicated for 5 s with a bath-type sonicator, and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C to remove large beads. Then the supernatant, containing small beads, was collected and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet of the small beads was suspended into a buffer and used as a rotation probe attached to the rotor γ subunit, and Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid-modified glass was used as a surface immobilizing stator α3β3 ring. Because the F1(αR364K) easily lapsed into the long inhibited state, the rotation assay was difficult to perform. This problem was avoided using magnetic beads that can be manipulated with magnetic tweezers to mechanically activate the inhibited F1 (34). The images of rotating beads were recorded at a rate of 30 frames/s and analyzed as previously described (18).

Preparation of Hybrid F1

Hybrid F1 containing one α(R364K), α(His6 at N terminus/C193S/R364K)α(C193S)2β3γ(S108C/I211C), termed F1(1×αR364K), was prepared as previously described (13) except for the introduced mutation. The biotinylated His tag-less wild-type F1 was mixed with the purified monomer of the His-tagged α(R364K) at a 3:1 molar ratio (F1:α) in the presence of 2 m urea, where F1 was disassembled into subunits. The hybrid F1, including the His-tagged α(R364K), was then reconstituted by dilution with urea. The remaining non-His-tagged F1 and subunits were removed by purifying the desired complex via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen). His-tagged monomers were also removed by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 10/300 GL; GE Healthcare). This preparation could be a mixture of the hybrid F1 containing 1, 2, and 3 α(R364K) subunits. However, an F1(1×αR364K)-enriched sample was obtained by the mixing ratio described above. Previously, we had obtained a sample with ∼90% of the hybrid F1 carrying one βE190D mutant at the same mixing ratio (13). Here, we obtained a sample containing almost the same percentage of F1(1×αR364K), which was confirmed by observing its rotation (See “Results”), although the theoretical probability according to the Poisson statistics predicted the slightly lower percentage of the F1(1×αR364K) in the population.

Rotation Assay of Hybrid F1

Rotation assays of the F1(1×αR364K) were carried out using duplex of polystyrene beads (0.2 μm; Polysciences) coated with NeutrAvidin (Thermo Scientific) as a rotation probe attached to the rotor γ subunit, and silane-coated coverglass as a surface immobilizing stator α3β3 ring, as previously described (13). Because the F1(1×αR364K) had only one His-tagged α subunit, fixation to the Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid-modified glass surface via His tags in the 3 α and 3 β subunits, as used in the rotation assay of F1(αR364K) (18), was not possible. To achieve adequate observation of the rotation, the F1(1×αR364K) molecules were fixed to the glass surface via nonspecific hydrophobic adsorption, and polystyrene beads were used as a rotation probe to avoid undesirable absorption to the surface directly. The images of rotating beads were recorded at 500 or 1,000 frames/s, and analyzed as previously described (35).

RESULTS

ATP Hydrolysis Activity

The arginine finger of TF1, αR364, was substituted with lysine to produce the mutant F1(αR364K) (Fig. 1). Unlike wild-type TF1, F1(αR364K) tightly holds bound ADP, and hence, nucleotide-depleted F1 was not obtained using the conventional purification procedure. Similarly, it was previously reported that the bound nucleotide on arginine-finger mutants of EF1 was resistant to the conventional nucleotide-depletion procedures (28). Therefore, in this study, F1(αR364K) was treated with alkaline phosphatase to completely degrade the nucleotide to nucleoside. After this treatment, bound nucleotides were not detected (considerably <0.1 molecule/F1) in the measurement of bound nucleotides (36). Fig. 2A shows the time course of ATP hydrolysis for F1(αR364K) and wild-type F1, measured using an ATP-regenerating system. After an initial burst, the activity exponentially decayed until it reached a steady state. This is typical of the time-dependent inactivation observed in TF1. Initially, all the F1 molecules in the assay mixture are fully active and show strong ATPase activity. Subsequently, some fraction of the molecules stochastically lapses into an inactive state, called the ADP-inhibited form, in which the catalytically produced ADP tightly binds to F1 and inhibits catalysis and rotation (37). Because the inhibited F1 spontaneously regains its catalytic activity by releasing the bound ADP into the solution, the apparent ATPase activity is not completely diminished, and a certain level of steady-state activity is retained. The hydrolysis rate at the initial phases measured at 1 mm ATP was 1.0 ± 0.04 s−1 (mean ± S.D., n = 3), which is 350 times slower than that of the wild-type TF1 (8). This corroborates the previous findings on EF1, indicating that the lysine substitution at the arginine finger caused suppression of ATPase activity by a factor of ∼103 (27, 28). By fitting the time course of ATPase activity, the rate constants for inactivation and activation of F1(αR364K) were determined to be 0.091 s−1 and 0.0092 s−1, respectively, 2 times faster and slower than those of wild-type, respectively. The resultant equilibrium constant of the active state was four times lower than that of the wild-type. At steady state, only 9% of the F1(αR364K) was active during ATP hydrolysis. These results indicated that the αR364K mutation causes severe ADP inhibition of TF1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Biochemical analysis of ATPase activity and single-molecule analysis of the long pause of F1(αR364K). A, time course of ATPase activity of the wild-type (blue) and F1(αR364K) (red) measured by spectrometer. B, three examples of time course of F1(αR364K) rotation before the long pause. C, distribution of rotating times before lapsing into the long pause. Solid line shows fit of the single-exponential decay function with a time constant of 13 ± 1.0 s (mean ± S.E.). D, distribution of angle during active rotation (top) and long pause (bottom). E, distribution of angular difference (Δθ defined in D) between the angle of the short pause in active rotation and that of the long pause. All measurements were carried out at 1 mm ATP.

Pause and Rotation

The rotary motion of F1(αR364K) was observed in the single-molecule assay by using a magnetic bead as a rotation probe (38). At 1 mm ATP, the F1(αR364K) showed continuous rotation in the counterclockwise direction (Fig. 2B), the same as the wild-type. This suggested that F1(αR364K) retained the intrinsic cooperativity among the 3 catalytic sites, contradicting the previous finding that mutation of the arginine finger impairs multisite catalysis (26, 27). However, the rotation rate of the mutant was only 0.37 rps (see Fig. 3A), which is much lower than that of the wild-type (5–10 rps under the same conditions) (39). This decrease in the rotation rate was not due to slow angular velocity of the mechanical rotation process, i.e. lower rotary torque. As seen in Figs. 2D and 3, B and C, F1(αR364K) rotated with 120° steps, each separated by a pause. This means that the rotation rate is determined by a slow chemical step that causes a pause. Under the same conditions, the wild-type does not show a clear stepping rotation, because the catalytic dwell of ∼2 ms is too short to be resolved in the rotation assay performed using a magnetic bead that obscures the catalytic pause due to the large viscous friction of water. Another remarkable feature of F1(αR364K) was that its continuous rotation was terminated by a long pause after several turns, as suggested from the bulk ATPase assay (Fig. 2B). The histogram of the rotating time until the long pause is shown in Fig. 2C. The distribution of the rotating time exponentially decayed with a time constant of 13 s. This value is in agreement with the time constant of inactivation (11 s) determined in the bulk ATPase assay. As reported for the ADP inhibition of wild-type F1 (34), F1(αR364K) also resumed its activity and the continuous stepwise rotation when the magnetic beads were forcibly rotated over 90° in the forward direction. Furthermore, the angular position of F1(αR364K) during the long pause (Fig. 2, D and E) coincided with that during the short pause, the latter of which was identified as the catalytic pause (see below). These findings indicated that the long-paused state represented the ADP inhibited form. The average number of rotation steps of 120° before lapsing into the ADP inhibited form is only 14.4, suggesting a strong tendency of F1(αR364K) to lapse into the inhibited form. In following experiments, we analyzed the active state of F1(αR364K). When molecules lapsed into the ADP inhibited form, they were reactivated using magnetic tweezers.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Rotation of F1(αR364K) at different ATP concentrations. A, dependence of rotation rate of F1(αR364K) on ATP concentration determined by single-molecule rotation assay. Open circles represent rotation rates of individual molecules. Filled circles represent average rotation rates at each ATP concentration. B, examples of time course of the rotation of F1(αR364K) at various ATP concentrations. C, distribution of angle in the rotation shown in B. Each histogram at different ATP concentrations corresponds to the example shown in B. D, distribution of duration times of the pauses. At 1 μm and 0.5 μm ATP, substeps were observed (see also Fig. 4), and the duration times for the pauses before 40° substeps were collected for the analysis. Solid lines show fits of the single-exponential decay function with time constants of 0.77 ± 0.029 s (1 mm), 0.86 ± 0.032 s (0.1 mm), 0.79 ± 0.032 s (10 μm), 0.70 ± 0.18 s (1 μm), and 0.63 ± 0.020 s (0.5 μm) (mean ± S.E.).

Michaelis-Menten Kinetics of Rotation

The rotation rate was determined at several ATP concentrations ranging from 500 nm to 10 mm. At <500 nm ATP, it was extremely difficult to finding rotating particles, probably because of severe ADP inhibition. The rotation rate follows a Michaelis-Menten-type curve against ATP concentration (Fig. 3A), yielding a maximum rotation rate (Vmax) of 0.37 rps and a Michaelis constant (Km) of 0.75 μm. As discussed above, the Vmax is not suppressed by the viscous friction of water on the bead, but by the intervening pauses (Fig. 3, B and C). Therefore, this value represents the maximum catalytic rate of F1(αR364K). Even when 40-nm colloidal gold was used as a non-frictional probe, the rotation rate remained the same (data not shown). The ATP hydrolysis rate (1.1 s−1) expected from the Vmax, assuming a coupling ratio of 1 ATP per 120° step, is largely consistent with that at 2 mm ATP (1.1 ± 0.06 s−1, mean ± S.D., n = 3) as determined in the bulk ATPase assay. Thus, the coupling ratio is also not impaired in F1(αR364K).

The Km of the mutant was less than the genuine Km of the wild-type, i.e. 15 μm, that was determined using 40-nm colloidal gold as a non-frictional probe (8). The binding rate constant for ATP, that was determined from 3×Vmax/Km, was 1.5 × 106 m−1s−1. Although this value is distinctly lower than that of the wild-type (2.6 × 107 m−1s−1), the impact of the αR364K mutation is not very large compared with the effect on Vmax, which is 350 times lower than that of the wild-type.

Analysis of Stepping Rotation

Fig. 3B shows the time-course of the rotation observed at several ATP concentrations. Each trace shows the stepping behavior. As shown in the histogram of the angular position during the continuous stepping rotation (Fig. 3C), F1(αR364K) made intervening pauses at 3 positions, at a distance of 120° from each other, at ATP concentrations ranging from 10 μm to 10 mm. Around the Km region where the ATP-waiting dwell becomes comparable with the duration of the intervening pause found at saturating ATP concentration, the histogram showed 6 peaks (1 μm in Fig. 3C). This indicates that F1 makes substeps of 80° and 40°, pausing at the binding and catalytic angles. This finding suggests that the intervening pauses found at saturating ATP concentration correspond to the catalytic dwell, not to the ATP-waiting dwell. The distribution of the duration time at the catalytic angle (Fig. 3D) also supports this notion; the histograms of the duration time showed almost identical exponential decay across all ATP concentrations tried.

Buffer Exchange Experiment

To further confirm that the intervening pauses observed at saturating ATP concentration correspond to the catalytic dwell, we conducted a buffer exchange experiment where the ATP concentration was changed from 1 mm to 500 nm. A set of representative time courses is shown in Fig. 4A. At 1 mm ATP, F1(αR364K) showed a 120° stepping rotation. When the buffer was changed to 500 nm ATP, the mutant showed substeps, pausing at 6 positions (Fig. 4B). The histogram of angular position showed additional peaks at +40° from the original pausing angles. These peaks disappeared after ATP concentration was returned to 1 mm. For statistical analysis, we compared the relative angular position (Δθ1) of the peaks that appeared at 500 nm ATP to the original pauses at 1 mm ATP in the buffer exchange experiment. For comparison, the relative angular position of the original pause (Δθ2) at the second set of 1 mm condition was also analyzed. As expected, Δθ1 was 38 ± 6.2°, and Δθ2 was −8.9 ± 9.4° (n = 21, Fig. 4C). Thus, we confirmed that F1(αR364K) pauses at the catalytic angle.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Rotation of a single-molecule F1(αR364K) at different ATP concentrations. A, examples of the time course of rotation. Buffer was exchanged during observation, and ATP concentration was reduced from 1 mm to 500 nm, and then increased back to 1 mm. B, distribution of angle in the rotation. C, distributions of angular difference (Δθ1 or Δθ2 defined in B) between the pausing angles before and after buffer exchange. The averaged values of Δθ1 and Δθ2 are 38 ± 6.2° and −8.9 ± 9.4° (mean ± S.D., n = 21), respectively.

ATPγS-driven Rotation

The recently established reaction scheme of catalysis and rotation suggests that F1 undergoes 2 reactions at the catalytic angle: cleavage of the bound ATP on β at the 200° state, and release of Pi from β at the 320° state. Therefore, there are (at least) 2 possibilities for the reduction in the reaction rate by the αR364K mutation: slow ATP hydrolysis and slow Pi release. Considering that several studies suggest that the arginine finger is responsible for the hydrolysis step (21, 28, 30, 31), we assessed the possibility that αR364K drastically reduces the hydrolysis rate. For this, we used an ATP analog (ATPγS), which is known to be slowly hydrolyzed—and found that it specifically decelerated the hydrolysis step by 60 times compared with that of ATP (Fig. 5) (40). In the presence of 1 mm ATPγS, F1(αR364K) showed an extremely slow rotation of around 0.008 rps. To our knowledge, this is the slowest unidirectional rotation of F1 reported thus far. As evident from the time courses of the rotation (Fig. 5A), F1 makes long pauses at 3 positions, suggesting that ATPγS lengthens the catalytic dwell. However, the histogram of the duration times showed a convex distribution (Fig. 5B), which can be explained by a consecutive two-reaction model. Fitting of the distribution with the consecutive reaction model yielded time constants of 47 and 4.7 s. The longer time constant is consistent with the expected time constant for the ATPγS hydrolysis of F1(αR364K); 60 × the ATP hydrolysis dwell of F1(αR364K), i.e. 0.7 s, is 42 s. This finding supports the notion that F1(αR364K) slows the ATP cleavage step. The time constant of the second reaction was also lengthened, i.e. 4.7 s, possibly indicating that the mutation affects Pi release because the arginine finger is also involved in Pi binding/release (4143).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Rotation of F1(αR364K) driven by ATPγS. A, examples of time course of rotation. Each trace represents rotation of different single molecules. B, distribution of duration times of the pauses. Solid line shows fit of the double-exponential functions with time constants of 47 ± 2.1 s and 4.7 ± 0.58 s (mean ± S.E.), assuming the two consecutive reactions. Measurements were carried out at 1 mm ATPγS.

Rotation of Hybrid F1 Carrying 1 αR364K Subunit and 2 Wild-type α Subunits

To verify the above hypotheses, we attempted to determine the absolute angular position of the lengthened catalytic pause in the 360° reaction scheme by using a hybrid F1 that carries a single α(R364K) subunit and 2 wild-type α subunits: F1(1×αR364K). In this hybrid, if the hydrolysis were slowed by the mutation, the incorporated α(R364K) would cause a pause at 200° from its own ATP-waiting angle. In case of Pi release, the mutant would cause a pause at +320° (−40°) from the binding angle. To discriminate these two possibilities, we observed the rotation of F1(1×αR364K) prepared by mixing the His tag-less wild-type F1 with monomer α(R364K) at a 3:1 molar ratio. The fraction of F1(1×αR364K) expected from the mixing ratio is ∼90% (13). As expected, the major fraction of the observed particles (∼84%) showed a single pause of ∼0.6 s per revolution at 10 mm ATP, corresponding to the lengthened catalytic pause of αR364K (data not shown, but very similar to the blue-fast trajectory in Fig. 6A).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Rotation of a hybrid F1, F1(1×αR364K). A, examples of time course of rotation at different ATP concentrations. Buffer was exchanged during observation and ATP concentration was increased from 500 nm (green-slow trace) to 10 mm (blue-fast trace). B, distribution of angles of the same observation in A. C, distribution of duration times of the ATP-waiting dwells at 500 nm ATP (top) and the catalytic dwells at 10 mm ATP (bottom). Solid lines show fits of the single-exponential decay function with time constants of 1.10 ± 0.02 s (top) and 606 ± 2.22 ms (bottom) (mean ± S.E.). Note that duration times at 10 mm ATP were counted from the observations without buffer exchange (data not shown), and ATP dependence of the waiting dwells were confirmed by the buffer exchange in each case. D, distributions of angular difference (Δθ1 or Δθ2 defined in B) between the pausing angles before and after buffer exchange. The averaged values of Δθ1 and Δθ2 are 160 ± 10° and 4.6 ± 10° (mean ± S.D., n = 20), respectively.

Next, F1(1×αR364K) was subjected to a rotation assay at a low ATP concentration of 500 nm where the αR364K should cause a distinctively longer ATP-waiting pause than that of wild-type, in addition to a lengthened catalytic pause. The typical rotation of F1(1×αR364K) showed 2 pauses per revolution (green-slow trajectory in Fig. 6A), and the angular difference between these pauses (Δθ1) was around 160° (top histogram in Fig. 6B). Note that a few molecules showed multiple pauses during the rotation, implying these were the hybrid F1s with 2 or 3 mutant α subunits; the data for these molecules were, therefore, omitted from the analysis. After the rotating particles were noted, ATP concentration was changed to 10 mm (blue-fast trajectory in Fig. 6A). While one pause corresponding to the ATP-waiting pause of the αR364K disappeared, the other pause persisted (bottom histogram in Fig. 6B). Hence, we could identify the angular position of the catalytic pause slowed by the αR364K mutation in relation to the ATP-waiting angle of the αR364K. The time constants for the ATP-waiting and catalytic pauses of the αR364K were 1.1 s and 0.61 s (Fig. 6C), respectively, both of which were almost identical to those determined in the Michaelis-Menten analysis of F1(αR364K) (Fig. 3). Statistical analysis of the angular displacement of the catalytic pause from the ATP-waiting angle was 200 ± 10° (360° − Δθ1, n = 20 molecules), whereas the positional shift of the catalytic pause angle before and after buffer exchange (Δθ2) was only 4.6 ± 10° (Fig. 6D). The latter supports the validity of the experiment. Thus, it was confirmed that the mutation slowed the ATP cleavage step.

DISCUSSION

Our results verify the crucial role of the arginine finger of F1 (Fig. 1) in the ATP cleavage step. The lysine mutation caused drastic suppression of the rate constant of the ATP cleavage step in the rotary catalysis of F1. This is shown by the following results: F1(αR364K) showed a 350-times longer pause than wild-type F1 at the catalytic angle where ATP cleavage and Pi release occur (Figs. 3 and 4). Moreover, this catalytic pause was lengthened by a slowly hydrolyzed ATP analog, ATPγS (Fig. 5), as expected from the impact of ATPγS on the catalysis of the wild-type. Hybrid F1 carrying a single copy of the αR364K subunit, F1(1×αR364K), was found to specifically induce a long catalytic pause only at +200° from the binding angle of the introduced αR364K, where the ATP cleavage step occurs (Fig. 6). On the other hand, the lysine mutation did not affect the unidirectionality of the rotation that is sustained by the sequential torque generated by the 3 β subunits. In addition, the mutation did not affect the coupling ratio of 3 ATPs per turn that is found in the wild-type. Thus, the present study establishes that the principal role of the arginine finger of F1 is not cooperative signal transmission among catalytic sites, but acceleration of the ATP cleavage rate.

The αR364K mutation also affected other aspects of F1. The other remarkable effect was severe ADP inhibition (Fig. 2); the mutant sustained successive rotation for only 13 s and for up to 80 s observed. The reason for this severe inhibition is unknown. One possibility, considering that the arginine finger is also involved in Pi release, is that irregular Pi release increases the extent of ADP inhibition in the mutant over that in the wild-type, (41, 42).

The binding rate constant for ATP is also affected by the αR364K mutation (Fig. 3). This implies that the arginine finger is also involved in the ATP binding process to some extent. However, the magnitude of this suppression is 15-fold, and the impact is lower than that on the ATP cleavage step. Although many qualitative attributes of αR364K mutation described in this study are consistent with those in previous biochemical studies, decrease in the binding rate constant is not apparently consistent with that in a biochemical study that showed KD is not affected by the mutation (28). This could be because the rotation assay evaluates the ATP-binding rate at the binding angle (0°), whereas the titration experiment in bulk likely assesses the binding at the catalytic angle of 320° under saturation conditions for measuring the third affinity site, KD3 (44). Considering the angle-dependent modulation of the ATP-binding kinetics, the angular difference likely causes the quantitative difference of the αR364K mutation on the ATP binding process. A stall experiment (38) on the ATP binding of F1(αR364K) would provide evidence for the role of the arginine finger in this process.

The arginine finger principally contributes to hydrolysis by accelerating the ATP cleavage step, corroborating the recent findings of structural, biochemical, and theoretical studies (21, 28, 30, 31). As suggested by these studies, the arginine finger likely stabilizes the transiently formed penta-coordinated state of γ-phosphate. Recently, the impact of the lysine mutation on ATP cleavage was studied using the quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics method.3 This theoretical data reproduced the present experimental data on the suppression of the ATP cleavage rate well, revealing that the shorter side chain of the lysine residue remarkably reduces F1's catalytic power for ATP cleavage, in addition to differences in chemistry between the primary amino group and the guanidium group. Nadanaciva et al. (28) previously investigated a glutamine substitution mutant of the arginine finger. They showed that the glutamine substitution completely impaired the ability to attain transition state stabilization, whereas the lysine substitution slightly retained this ability. This suggests that the positive charge at the arginine finger position is required for catalysis. We have also tried an alanine substitution of the arginine finger. However, the ATP hydrolytic activity was not detected in the bulk ATPase assay, and the rotary motion of F1 was not found under the present conditions.

There is apparent discrepancy between the present work and the previous biochemical study by Le et al., who concluded that the principal role of the arginine finger is not rate enhancement of ATP cleavage, but sustenance of cooperative signal transmission among the 3 catalytic sites (27). Their conclusion was drawn on the basis of the observation that the arginine mutants diminished chase promotion, which assesses whether unisite catalysis is enhanced by the binding of ATP to other catalytic sites; thus, chase promotion is used as a barometer of the cooperative interactions among the catalytic sites. The apparent discrepancy between the present and previous conclusions is attributable to not only the largely slowed turnover rate of multisite catalysis, but also the severe level of ADP inhibition. The strong tendency of the mutant to be inhibited by bound ADP would mask the apparent chase promotion.

Unisite catalysis was reported not to be impaired by the lysine mutation (26, 27). On the other hand, the present study establishes that the same mutation remarkably lowers the ATP cleavage rate in multisite catalysis. Therefore, in conclusion, it is reasonable to assume that the arginine finger is not directly involved in unisite catalysis; the chemistry of unisite catalysis differs from that of the catalytically active site (200° state) in multisite catalysis, as thoroughly discussed previously (3).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members of Noji laboratory for valuable discussions and advice. We also thank Drs. K. Adachi (Gakushuin University), S. Toyabe (Munich University), E. Muneyuki (Chuo University), and M. Yoshida (Kyoto Sangyo University) for technical help in the preparation of hybrid F1 and data analysis.

*

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research from MEXT (Project ID 18074005) (to H. N.), and by special education and research expenses grant (to H. N.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

3

S. Hayashi, H. Ueno, A. R. Shaikh, M. Umemura, M. Kamiya, Y. Ito, M. Ikeguchi, Y. Komoriya, R. Iino, and H. Noji, unpublished data.

2
The abbreviations used are:
F1
F1-ATPase
GAP
G-protein-activating protein
ATPγS
adenosine 5′-(γ-thio)triphosphate
AMP-PNP
adenosine-5′-(β,γ-imino)-triphosphate
EF1
F1-ATPase from Escherichia coli
MF1
F1-ATPase from bovine or yeast mitochondria
TF1
F1-ATPase from thermophilic Bacillus PS3
F1(αR364K)
F1 carrying three copies of the αR364K subunit
F1(1×αR364K)
hybrid F1 carrying single copy of the αR364K subunit.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kinosita K., Jr., Yasuda R., Noji H. (2000) F1-ATPase: a highly efficient rotary ATP machine. Essays Biochem. 35, 3–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Nakamoto R. K., Baylis Scanlon J. A., Al-Shawi M. K. (2008) The rotary mechanism of the ATP synthase. Arch Biochem. Biophys 476, 43–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Senior A. E., Nadanaciva S., Weber J. (2002) The molecular mechanism of ATP synthesis by F1F0-ATP synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1553, 188–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Yoshida M., Muneyuki E., Hisabori T. (2001) ATP synthase-a marvelous rotary engine of the cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 669–677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Düser M. G., Zarrabi N., Cipriano D. J., Ernst S., Glick G. D., Dunn S. D., Börsch M. (2009) 36 degrees step size of proton-driven c-ring rotation in FoF1-ATP synthase. EMBO J. 28, 2689–2696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Noji H., Yasuda R., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Jr. (1997) Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature 386, 299–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Spetzler D., York J., Daniel D., Fromme R., Lowry D., Frasch W. (2006) Microsecond time scale rotation measurements of single F1-ATPase molecules. Biochemistry 45, 3117–3124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yasuda R., Noji H., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Jr., Itoh H. (2001) Resolution of distinct rotational substeps by submillisecond kinetic analysis of F1-ATPase. Nature 410, 898–904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Omote H., Sambonmatsu N., Saito K., Sambongi Y., Iwamoto-Kihara A., Yanagida T., Wada Y., Futai M. (1999) The γ-subunit rotation and torque generation in F1-ATPase from wild-type or uncoupled mutant Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 7780–7784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Uchihashi T., Iino R., Ando T., Noji H. (2011) High-speed atomic force microscopy reveals rotary catalysis of rotorless F1-ATPase. Science 333, 755–758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Watanabe R., Iino R., Noji H. (2010) Phosphate release in F1-ATPase catalytic cycle follows ADP release. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 814–820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Weber J. (2010) Structural biology: Toward the ATP synthase mechanism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 794–795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ariga T., Muneyuki E., Yoshida M. (2007) F1-ATPase rotates by an asymmetric, sequential mechanism using all three catalytic subunits. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14, 841–846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Adachi K., Oiwa K., Nishizaka T., Furuike S., Noji H., Itoh H., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Jr. (2007) Coupling of rotation and catalysis in F(1)-ATPase revealed by single-molecule imaging and manipulation. Cell 130, 309–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Abrahams J. P., Leslie A. G., Lutter R., Walker J. E. (1994) Structure at 2.8 A resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature 370, 621–628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bowler M. W., Montgomery M. G., Leslie A. G., Walker J. E. (2006) How azide inhibits ATP hydrolysis by the F-ATPases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8646–8649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sielaff H., Rennekamp H., Engelbrecht S., Junge W. (2008) Functional halt positions of rotary FOF1-ATPase correlated with crystal structures. Biophys. J. 95, 4979–4987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Okuno D., Fujisawa R., Iino R., Hirono-Hara Y., Imamura H., Noji H. (2008) Correlation between the conformational states of F1-ATPase as determined from its crystal structure and single-molecule rotation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20722–20727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Masaike T., Koyama-Horibe F., Oiwa K., Yoshida M., Nishizaka T. (2008) Cooperative three-step motions in catalytic subunits of F(1)-ATPase correlate with 80 degrees and 40 degrees substep rotations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1326–1333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Oster G., Wang H. (2000) Reverse engineering a protein: the mechanochemistry of ATP synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1458, 482–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kagawa R., Montgomery M. G., Braig K., Leslie A. G., Walker J. E. (2004) The structure of bovine F1-ATPase inhibited by ADP and beryllium fluoride. EMBO J. 23, 2734–2744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Menz R. I., Walker J. E., Leslie A. G. (2001) Structure of bovine mitochondrial F(1)-ATPase with nucleotide bound to all three catalytic sites: implications for the mechanism of rotary catalysis. Cell 106, 331–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mao H. Z., Weber J. (2007) Identification of the βTP site in the x-ray structure of F1-ATPase as the high-affinity catalytic site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18478–18483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Noel J. P., Hamm H. E., Sigler P. B. (1993) The 2.2 A crystal structure of transducin-α complexed with GTPγS. Nature 366, 654–663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Scheffzek K., Ahmadian M. R., Kabsch W., Wiesmüller L., Lautwein A., Schmitz F., Wittinghofer A. (1997) The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. Science 277, 333–338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Soga S., Noumi T., Takeyama M., Maeda M., Futai M. (1989) Mutational replacements of conserved amino acid residues in the α subunit change the catalytic properties of Escherichia coli F1-ATPase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 268, 643–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Le N. P., Omote H., Wada Y., Al-Shawi M. K., Nakamoto R. K., Futai M. (2000) Escherichia coli ATP synthase α subunit Arg-376: the catalytic site arginine does not participate in the hydrolysis/synthesis reaction but is required for promotion to the steady state. Biochemistry 39, 2778–2783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nadanaciva S., Weber J., Wilke-Mounts S., Senior A. E. (1999) Importance of F1-ATPase residue α-Arg-376 for catalytic transition state stabilization. Biochemistry 38, 15493–15499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Turina P., Aggeler R., Lee R. S., Senior A. E., Capaldi R. A. (1993) The cysteine introduced into the α subunit of the Escherichia coli F1-ATPase by the mutation α R376C is near the αβ subunit interface and close to a noncatalytic nucleotide binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 6978–6984 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dittrich M., Hayashi S., Schulten K. (2003) On the mechanism of ATP hydrolysis in F1-ATPase. Biophys. J. 85, 2253–2266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yang W., Gao Y. Q., Cui Q., Ma J., Karplus M. (2003) The missing link between thermodynamics and structure in F1-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 874–879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Enoki S., Watanabe R., Iino R., Noji H. (2009) Single-molecule study on the temperature-sensitive reaction of F1-ATPase with a hybrid F1 carrying a single β(E190D). J. Biol. Chem. 284, 23169–23176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Digel J. G., Kishinevsky A., Ong A. M., McCarty R. E. (1996) Differences between two tight ADP binding sites of the chloroplast coupling factor 1 and their effects on ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19976–19982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hirono-Hara Y., Ishizuka K., Kinosita K., Jr., Yoshida M., Noji H. (2005) Activation of pausing F1 motor by external force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4288–4293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Toyabe S., Okamoto T., Watanabe-Nakayama T., Taketani H., Kudo S., Muneyuki E. Nonequilibrium energetics of a single F1-ATPase molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104:198103, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Noji H., Bald D., Yasuda R., Itoh H., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Jr. (2001) Purine but not pyrimidine nucleotides support rotation of F(1)-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25480–25486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hirono-Hara Y., Noji H., Nishiura M., Muneyuki E., Hara K. Y., Yasuda R., Kinosita K., Jr., Yoshida M. (2001) Pause and rotation of F(1)-ATPase during catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 13649–13654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Watanabe R., Okuno D., Sakakihara S., Shimabukuro K., Iino R., Yoshida M., Noji H. (2012) Mechanical modulation of catalytic power on F(1)-ATPase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 86–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Iko Y., Tabata K. V., Sakakihara S., Nakashima T., Noji H. (2009) Acceleration of the ATP-binding rate of F1-ATPase by forcible forward rotation. FEBS Lett. 583, 3187–3191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shimabukuro K., Yasuda R., Muneyuki E., Hara K. Y., Kinosita K., Jr., Yoshida M. (2003) Catalysis and rotation of F1 motor: cleavage of ATP at the catalytic site occurs in 1 ms before 40 degree substep rotation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14731–14736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ahmad Z., Senior A. E. (2005) Identification of phosphate binding residues of Escherichia coli ATP synthase. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 37, 437–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kabaleeswaran V., Puri N., Walker J. E., Leslie A. G., Mueller D. M. (2006) Novel features of the rotary catalytic mechanism revealed in the structure of yeast F1 ATPase. EMBO J. 25, 5433–5442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kabaleeswaran V., Shen H., Symersky J., Walker J. E., Leslie A. G., Mueller D. M. (2009) Asymmetric structure of the yeast F1 ATPase in the absence of bound nucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10546–10551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Shimo-Kon R., Muneyuki E., Sakai H., Adachi K., Yoshida M., Kinosita K., Jr. (2010) Chemo-mechanical coupling in F(1)-ATPase revealed by catalytic site occupancy during catalysis. Biophys. J. 98, 1227–1236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES