Novel Cardiac-Specific Biomarkers and the Cardiovascular Continuum

Abstract

The concept of the cardiovascular continuum, introduced during the early 1990s, created a holistic view of the chain of events connecting cardiovascular-related risk factors with the progressive development of pathological-related tissue remodelling and ultimately, heart failure and death. Understanding of the tissue-specific changes, and new technologies developed over the last 25–30 years, enabled tissue remodelling events to be monitored in vivo and cardiovascular disease to be diagnosed more reliably than before. The tangible product of this evolution was the introduction of a number of biochemical markers such as troponin I and T, which are now commonly used in clinics to measure myocardial damage. However, biomarkers that can detect specific earlier stages of the cardiovascular continuum have yet to be generated and utilised. The majority of the existing markers are useful only in the end stages of the disease where few successful intervention options exist. Since a large number of patients experience a transient underlying developing pathology long before the signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease become apparent, the requirement for new markers that can describe the early tissue-specific, matrix remodelling process which ultimately leads to disease is evident. This review highlights the importance of relating cardiac biochemical markers with specific time points along the cardiovascular continuum, especially during the early transient phase of pathology progression where none of the existing markers aid diagnosis.

Cardiovascular Continuum (CVC) and Biomarkers

The evidence-based concept of a cardiovascular continuum (CVC) introduced in 1991 by Dzau and Braunwald ingeniously described the vast number of different and diverse tissue remodelling processes that gradually lead to cardiovascular-related pathology, heart failure and death. Further validation and expansion of the CVC model was performed through pathophysiology and clinical trial evidence^1,2 which highlighted the impact of risk factors related to cardiovascular disease (CVD), such as cigarette smoking and diabetes, in the initiation of the CVC vicious circle which was also extended to include other affected organs such as the brain and the kidney. A key remark by Dzau et al in recent CVC validation work² stresses the value of biomarkers for risk assessment, early diagnosis and prognosis while emphasising that markers that may also act as mediators of disease. Undoubtedly, a biomarker or a panel of markers which could facilitate stratification of patients in the appropriate CVC segment could prove invaluable in a clinical setting, as it would allow early intervention at the beginning of the CVC where prevention may be possible.^3–5 However, existing biomarkers cannot fully realize this goal as only a handful of these, mainly troponin, have been found to be cardiac specific and even then, are only useful in detecting myocardial damage in the late stages of CVD, in what has recently been described as the vascular aging continuum (VAC).⁶ The vast majority of other biomarkers seem to be up-or down-regulated in non CVD-related pathologies. At this time, the selection of biomarkers that can reliably facilitate prognosis during the early stages of CVC is limited (Fig. 1). An overview of frequently used CVD biomarkers is presented in this paper to underline some of the strengths and weaknesses that these have, and propose an approach for future, novel biomarker development.

Figure 1.

Existing biomarkers are valuable diagnostic and monitoring tools mainly for the end stages of cardiovascular disease.

Notes: There is currently a lack of biomarkers that can reliably describe the transient, underlying abnormal extracellular matrix remodelling (ECMR) which ultimately leads to cardiovascular-related pathology. The illustration of atherosclerosis progression and the lack of early biomarkers of atheromatic formation is indicative of this unmet need. The timeline of atheromatic formation is suggestive of the large extent of matrix remodelling which takes place over decades and remains unmonitored for the large part. Accurate monitoring of early cardiac ECMR could prompt early intervention and prevention of disease progression.

Clinically Relevant Cardiac Markers

Creatinine kinase (CK) and CK-MB

Creatinine kinase MB is an enzyme present primarily in cardiac muscle. The MB is one of the three CK isoenzymes the other being the MM and BB. CK-MB is released rapidly after myocardial injury.⁷ During an onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), CK-MB rises to twice the normal levels within 6 hours and peaks within 12–24 hours.^8–10 Serial CK-MB mass measurements have a nearly 90% sensitivity of AMI three hours after a patient is first assessed in a hospital emergency department, which equates to approximately 6 hours after symptom onset, but these measurements are only 36%–48% sensitive when used at, or shortly after, presentation.^9,11 CK-MB plays an important role in defining the infarct size, expansion and risk of re-infarction. If a cTn is not available, the CK-MB is considered the best alternative marker of AMI. Decades ago, elevated serum levels of CK-MB, the cardiac-specific isoform of CK, were also used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of myocardial necrosis. This measure satisfied one component of the diagnostic criteria for MI, as proposed by the World Health Organization, and its use was later extended to monitor trends and determinants in a cardiovascular disease study.¹² Even though the CK-MB has been proven a relatively sensitive measure of myocardial necrosis and AMI, this enzyme is not exclusively specific to myocardial damage, as elevated levels in several conditions following acute or chronic muscle injury and in patients undergoing surgical procedures, have been found.¹³ Furthermore, CK is present in the intestine, diaphragm, uterus and prostate, and injury to these organs would result in release of CK-MB and thus impair the specificity of CK-MB serum measurements. In order increase the specificity of CK-MB measurements and thereby distinguish the “true positive” serum elevations secondary to myocardial injury from the “false positive” elevations due to other tissue injury, the measurement of CK-MB as a percentage of total CK has been used. There is no clear consensus on whether absolute CK-MB or the CK-MB relative index is the preferred test for patients with potential acute coronary syndromes, but the World Health Organization international diagnostic criteria, and several others, recommend use of absolute CK-MB.¹⁴

Myoglobin

Myoglobin is a relatively small, 17.8 kDa, heme protein that is abundant in the cytoplasm of cardiac and skeletal muscle cells. The main function of myoglobin is to transport oxygen within muscle cells, and it constitutes approximately 2% of muscle protein in both skeletal and cardiac muscles.

The tissue/plasma ratio of myoglobin is very high, and combined with its small size, myoglobin is rapidly released into the circulation upon tissue necrosis and injury. Of the biomarkers routinely collected from patients suspected or diagnosed with CVD, myoglobin is generally accepted as one of the earliest to appear during the development of the disease. Elevated levels following an AMI appear in the circulation after 0.5–2 hours. Since myoglobin is only released as a result of tissue necrosis, it is a poor biomarker of acute cardiac ischemia. Furthermore, myocardial and skeletal muscle myoglobins share 100% homology, thus making this marker tissue unspecific. Myoglobin is cleared by kidneys, and it has been reported that patients suffering from renal insufficiency have increased plasma levels of myoglobin, and thus readings may be falsely high. There is difference of opinion as to whether myoglobin is a useful biomarker in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. As assays for measurements of cardiac-specific biomarkers such as cTnI and cTnT have become available, the value of myoglobin as a cardiac biomarker has decreased.¹⁵ Current guidelines recommend myoglobin measurements only in patients presenting within 6 hours of chest-pain onset.¹⁶ Recent studies have demonstrated that, among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), those with raised myoglobin levels before the initiation of fibrinolytic therapy are at high risk for death and heart failure.¹⁷ For patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain in the absence of ST-elevation, the addition of myoglobin to biomarker panels that include CK-MB and cTnI or cTnT improves sensitivity for the detection of MI, particularly in patients presenting early after symptom onset.^{8,9,11,15,18,19} Beyond the diagnosis of MI, there are discrepancies as to whether myoglobin is useful for risk-stratification in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). One recent study has suggested that myoglobin provides incremental prognostic information to CK-MB and troponin,⁹ but several others have not reached the same conclusion.^8,18,19

Lipoprotein A

Lipoprotein (A) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle with an apolipoptotein A (apoA) attached. Apo(A) is linked to LDL by a disulfide bond.²⁰ This structure has significant homology to plasminogen, and the enhanced coronary heart disease (CHD) risk associated with Lp(a) is reportedly due to inhibiting the effects of this lipoprotein particle on plasminogen activation, enhancing the risk of thrombosis. Lp(a) may also increase atherogenicity of LDL.^21,22 Many observational trials support the association of Lp(a) with enhanced cardiovascular risk.²³ In general, it has been postulated that every 30 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) doubles the risk of CHD. Therapeutic modification of Lp(a) is controversial. Only estrogen and niacin have been showed to moderately lower Lp(a).²⁴

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)

Measurement of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration is a very efficient and cost-effective mass screening technique for identifying patients with various cardiac abnormalities, regardless of aetiology.²⁵ BNP is a 32-amino acid polypeptide cardiac neuro-hormone secreted from membrane granules in the cardiac ventricles, particularly the left ventricle, as a response to ventricular volume expansion and pressure overload.^25,26 Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (B-NP) are of myocardial cell origin, while C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is of endothelial origin.²⁵ BNP was originally named brain natriuretic peptide, and it was first detected in porcine brain.^27,28 BNP levels have been found elevated in patients with various clinical conditions such as heart failure, MI, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiac inflammation, primary pulmonary hypertension, renal failure, ascetic cirrhosis and is associated with advanced age.²⁹ The levels correlate with severity of symptoms and with prognosis, and so it helps to detect the presence of heart failure, determine its severity, and estimate prognosis. BNP has the potential to considerably improve the management of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and may become a routinely assessed serum parameter in clinical medicine. BNP is considerably less costly than other tests for CHD, and due to its cost-effectiveness is highly desirable in developing countries. Originally, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of BNP or NT-proBNP (amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) to assist in differentiating a cardiac cause (such as congestive heart failure) from a non-cardiac origin (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) for dyspnea. Recently, NT-proBNP was approved by the FDA for use in assessing the prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, while the BNP assay is also approved for risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome.³⁰

Troponins I and T

The troponin protein complex consists of 3 subunits, the C (TnC) subunit which is the calcium binding component, the I (TnI) which maintains the structural position of the troponin-tropomyosin complex, and the T (TnT) which is the tropomyosin binding subunit. All are located on the thin filament of both skeletal and myocardial myocytes, the latter playing an integral role in the Frank-Starling mechanism of the heart.^31,32 Interestingly, both TnT and TnI sub-units have distinct isoforms for each muscle type, hence there is a specific cardiac isoform.³³ Cardiac troponins T and I (cTnT and cTnI) are now recognized as the most tissue-specific biomarkers related to cardiac damage and have been included as a diagnostic criterion for several cardiac-related pathologies.^34–39 This success is closely related to the troponins’ unique position and function in the cardiomyocyte and the ability to generate specific monoclonal antibodies against both cTnT and cTnI which are precise tissue-specific biomarkers of myocardial injury that are not detected in healthy individuals.³¹ Due to the integral role of troponins in myocardial contraction and their success as cardiac-specific markers, the question has risen as to whether troponin-related proteolysis is somehow also implicated in the development of cardiac damage that leads to heart failure, through a gradual procedure which eventually leads to decreased diastolic and systolic function.³⁴ The notion that proteolysis is present early in cardiac disease and can facilitate progress to cardiac damage through troponin degradation has not been yet broadly utilised for the development of proteolytic fragments as cardiac-specific markers.

Osteopontin

Osteopontin (OPN) is a matricellular glycoprotein/cytokine that has been recently found to be a promising prognostic biomarker for patients with heart failure, ischemic heart disease and cardiac remodelling in both clinical and pre-clinical settings.^40–44 Even though its expression by macrophages during myocardial necrosis has been reported since 1994⁴⁵ its precise function is not fully understood. OPN has previously been described as a regulator of inflammation and bio-mineralisation via macrophage interaction while also associated with bone remodelling.^46–48 OPN has been characterised as an independent predictor of death within 4 years for patients with heart failure and was found highly elevated in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.⁴⁰ However, OPN is expressed in many tissues and has also been described as a marker in non-CVD related pathologies which include cancer, myeloma, multiple sclerosis, bone destruction, angiogenesis, Graves’ disease and pulmonary hypertension.^48–54 This inherently impedes the direct association of OPN up-regulation with the early phase of any of its related pathologies, particularly early CVC, prior to the development of other clinical symptoms that can facilitate reliable diagnosis.

C-reactive protein (CRP)

C-reative protein (CRP) is a non-specific acute-phase reactant protein produced in the liver. It is associated with a variety of diverse functions related to immune reactivity including complement activation, innate immunity and phagocyte stimulation.⁵⁵ Even though its usefulness was initially greeted with scepticism due to the fact that it has been previously used as an non-specific inflammatory marker,⁵⁶ it has since been widely used as an acute inflammation marker. It has been found to be a reliable marker for a variety of CVD-related pathologies which include atheromatic plaque vulnerability, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, coronary vasospasm, left ventricular dysfunction, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction.^57–61 CRP levels have been found to be related to levels of cardiac enzymes and troponin I,⁶¹ while in some cases it was found to be a better marker of CVD than troponin T.⁶² CRP has been found to have a role in myocardial and cerebral infarct growth and has been consequently targeted by inhibitors to induce a cardio- protective effect.⁶³ However this application has yet to be fully realised.⁶⁴ Its reliability has several limitations as human CRP levels greatly vary, depending on ethnicity, gender, and genetics, and it has also been associated with obesity and weight loss.^64,65 In addition, it has been described as an indicator/ marker for non-cardiac related pathologies such as anastomotic leakage, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and dementia.^66–68

Recent advances in identifying clinical markers with promising early prognostic and diagnostic capacity

A number of additional novel clinical markers have also been studied recently. Some of these show promising results as early prognostic and diagnostic markers, as outlined below, although their ultimate utility remains to be tested in large clinical settings.

During the last 10 years, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) has received much attention as a promising cardiovascular biomarker. ADMA is an endogenous competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase although it can also cause vasoconstriction.⁶⁹ It has been found to be increased in a number of cardiovascular events that include atherosclerosis, hypertension, coronary artery disease and chronic heart failure, and even on its own, is believed to be a novel cardiovascular risk factor.^69–72 ADMA has also been associated with inflammation and increased risk of death in cardiovascular related events.⁷³

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is another recently described biomarker that has been found to be relevant for heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and, recently, atherosclerosis.^74,75 MPO is an enzyme which among other molecules can produce hypochlorite and has been shown to be released early in the inflammatory process, while it has been linked to both inflammation and oxidative stress.^75,76 MPO has been found to be related to CVD due to its involvement in LDL and HDL oxidation which is closely related to plaque formation in arterial walls through increased cholesterol aggregation. ⁷⁵ MPO has shown some promising early results in clinical settings, being able to demonstrate a diagnostic value of CVD even in individuals showing negative results for troponin T. However, a key characteristic of MPO utilisation is that its elevation may not be directly related to cardiac or vascular tissue remodelling and may be attributed to underlying inflammatory processes which ultimately lead to organ failure.⁷⁷

F2 isoprostanes are a family of prostaglandin compounds derived from arachidonic acid peroxidation which have recently shown promising potential as in vivo markers of oxidant injury in cardiovascular pathologies such as atherosclerosis, hypertension and, recently, ACS.^78–80 Even though increased levels of this marker have been found in non-cardiovascular related pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease, pulmonary disorders and renal failure, its presence has been strongly linked with well-known cardiovascular risk factors.^78,81,82 However, and despite these promising results, use of F2 isoprostanes have not been used on a large scale. Relevant literature in large cohorts is limited, which restricts evaluation of its potential.

Cardiac Extracellular Matrix Components and Opportunities for Biomarker Development

Cardiac extracellular matrix

The cardiac extracellular matrix (CECM) is a vibrant three-dimensional entity which offers structural support to which cells adhere and migrate. It consists primarily of collagen, mainly type I but also III, IV, V, VI, glycoproteins, proteoglycans as well as diverse cell types such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells.⁸³ Recognition of the constantly active dynamics of the CECM attracted additional attention to the possibility that its close monitoring could enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms occurring in the transition from physiology to pathology.⁸⁴

CECM modifications during the natural ECM remodelling process increase with age and are part of a physiologic process, particularly because the CECM activates cardiac fibroblasts.^85,86 However, unbalanced cardiac extracellular matrix remodelling (CECMR) can result in cardiovascular-related pathology through a mast cell-driven process and ultimately in heart failure.^87,88

The collagenous cardiac CECM has been shown to have higher turnover rates than other tissues, possibly due to its contribution to diastolic stiffness.^89,90 The practical outcome of this observation was the introduction and utilisation of CECM-related biomarkers such as procollagen types I and III (PINP, PICP, and PIIINP) that could monitor CECMR⁹¹ and its effects on diastolic dysfunction, pumping capacity and ventricular volume. An additional key property of cardiac CECM constituents is their ability to participate in inflammatory pathways that ultimately affect cardiac repair and pathogenesis.⁹² Due to these exceptional properties as active participants of cardiac and vascular remodelling, the use of CECM constituents as promising non-invasive early indicators of underlying developing pathology and inadequate tissue adaptation has been proposed.^91,93–96

Cardiac matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)

MMPs are a family of proteases that together with other proteases, such as cathepsins and elastases, play a key regulatory role in tissue remodelling in both physiology and in a number of pathologies which include cancer, fibrosis and CVD.^97,98 Under normal physiologic conditions, there is a balance between MMPs that degrade CECM components and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs).^99,100 However, during developing pathology, events such as decreased TIMP expression and activation of mast cells through chronic stimuli or increased stress, can induce increased MMP activation which in turn drives abnormal CECMR, eventually leading to cardiac and vascular disease and ultimately death.^88,101 MMP activity has been implicated in a large number of diverse cardiac and vascular pathologies which include cardiomyopathies, atherosclerosis, aneurism, myocarditis, hypertension and viral heart disease.^{88,97,100,102–105} MMP effects and activity are closely related to the availability of substrates, some of which have been found to be specific for some MMPs.⁸⁶ An example of such specificity is MMP-8, -3 and -13 which have been described as specific for fibrillar collagens; MMP-7 against collagens I, III and proteoglycans; while MMP-2 and -9 were found to preferentially cleave proteoglycans in myocardial tissue.^97,102 Analogous substrate-MMP specificities and interactions have been reported in the ECM of both cardiac and vascular components, further highlighting the importance of these interactions in ECMR during physiology and pathology.^106–111 The tangible product of this recognition was MMP utilisation as CECMR specific markers with promising results.^105,112 MMPs are also actively employed in non-cardiovascular related tissues and organs which include liver, skin, and lung. This presents the practical problem of how to pin-point the precise tissue source of the substrate-MMP biomarker. Biomarkers that rely on MMPs and their action on specific substrates to form tissue-specific neoepitopes have been successfully employed for ECMR- related pathologies other than cardiovascular. The utilisation of such technologies should be further investigated for cardiovascular pathologies.^98,113–119

MMPs and ECM remodelling in atherosclerosis

In most cases the underlying cause of CVD is atherosclerosis. Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques are characterized by their propensity to rupture, exposing thrombogenic material to the circulation and consequently initiating the formation of luminal thrombi and ischemia. One of the key determinants of lesion stability is the composition and integrity of the plaque ECM. The quantity and quality of the ECM is of paramount importance in defining plaque stability. For instance, stable ECM-rich plaques which remain generally asymptomatic are characterized by their dense ECM, composed primarily of fibrillar and non-fibrillar collagens and proteoglycans. On the other hand, vulnerable or unstable plaques have a thin and disrupted fibrous cap and the collagen content in the ECM is clearly reduced.¹⁰⁸ The proteolytic activity of MMPs is a key regulator of ECM integrity in atherosclerosis. ¹²⁰ Several studies have shown increased expression and activity of MMPs, including MMP-1, -2, -3 and -9, in vulnerable areas of atherosclerotic plaques.^121,122 While MMPs could collectively target many different ECM components, most studies have focused on the collagenolysis, especially of type I collagen, taking place in lesions. In one of the key studies, the proteolytic activity was attributed to MMP-1 and -13.¹²³ Another proteinase which has received substantial attention is MMP-9. Synthesis of active MMP-9 by macrophages and smooth muscle cells was demonstrated in human coronary atherectomy specimens taken from patients with unstable angina but was not found in stable patients.¹²⁴ MMP-9 is one of the few extracellular proteins with biomarker potential in CVD.¹²⁵ While collagen degradation has been studied in detail, little is known of the proteolytic processing of other ECM components, especially glycoproteins and proteoglycans. One of the main non-collagen components of vessels with important structural and regulatory functions is the large aggregating proteoglycan versican. Halpert et al showed that versican could be a substrate for MMP-7 and -12 at sites of plaque rupture.¹²⁶ Although MMP-12 is a protease with general substrate specificity and is highly expressed by activated macrophages, its role in atherosclerosis is not well understood.¹²⁷ However, it is known to play a key role in the pathological development of abdominal aortic aneurysms, not only because it cleaves elastin and type I collagen but because it targets various ECM glycoproteins, including collagen XII, tenascin, fibronectin, thrombospondins and periostin.¹⁰⁶ Proteolysis of the ECM not only compromises its structural properties, but its degradation products have been recently shown to activate pro-inflammatory signalling via toll-like receptors (TLRs). Hyaluronic acid degradation products (that is, tetra- and hexa-saccharides) have the ability to act as endogenous TLR-2 and -4 ligands in a variety of cell types, including macrophages and endothelial cells.¹²⁸ Similarly, the fibronectin splice variant extra-type III domain A (EDA), has been shown to activate T-cells and induce MMP-9 expression in human monocytes by activating TLR-4.¹²⁹ The role of EDA fragments in CVD was recently highlighted by Arslan and colleagues.¹³⁰ Moreover, Kim et al recently showed that versican fragments activate TLR-2¹³¹ and Babelova et al described a proinflammatory effect of biglycan via TLR-2 and -4.¹³² Given the well-documented importance of TLR-2 and -4 in human atherosclerosis¹³³ and the extensive remodelling of the ECM in CVD, the connection between MMP activity and the generation of bioactive, pro-inflammatory fragments from ECM proteins needs to be further investigated.

CECM matrikines

As seen in the previous sections, CECM and its constant interaction with proteases constitutes a complex and active entity in both physiology and pathology. The accumulated information on the continuous interaction between proteases and ECM gave birth to the conception of matrikines. The term was used to describe peptides formed by protease-driven ECM proteolysis that were able to regulate cell activities via interaction cell surface receptors-.¹³⁴ The finding that matrikines can regulate both ECM synthesis and remodelling as well as MMP production and activation is indicative of the strong influence they may have in physiology and in transition processes that ultimately lead to pathology. ¹³⁵ A number of proteins including elastin, various collagen types, glycoproteins and laminin^134,136 have been recently described as ECM matrikine sources and mainly indicate the presence of tumours. However, the fact that most of these proteins exist in a large variety of tissues increases the possibility that these may be implicated in other pathologies. Angiogenesis is a prime example of such an occurrence, since it takes place in a variety of diverse processes such as arthritis, wound healing, tumour growth, and cardiovascular- related events such as atherosclerosis and post-ischemic vascularisation of the myocardium.¹³⁷ Even though cardiovascular specific matrikines have not yet been described in detail, cardiovascular-related proteins such as elastin and their remodelling has been previously associated with angiogenesis, related inflammatory infiltrate and severity of atherosclerosis and aneurism progression.^137–139 The possibility of cardiac-specific matrikines being implicated in cardiovascular pathology-related events, whether directly or indirectly should be further studied. The large number of potential combinations of peptide cleavages between cardiac-specific ECM protein constituents and proteases could result in a great number of matrikines that even though locally generated could have an effect on both adjacent and distant cells and tissues.

The above is a significant task., The example of successful utilisation of neoepitopes as biomarkers for a number of different pathologies is indicative of potential benefits of such approach^{98,113–116,119} in this case. The question arises whether certain neoepitopes could also act as matrikines. Since both neoepitopes and matrikines are generated by proteolytic action of proteases on ECM, this possibility may exist and should be further assessed.

Discussion-Cardiovascular Continuum and Novel Cardiac Biomarkers

The discovery of novel and tissue-specific cardiac biomarkers that can reliably assess pathologic conditions is important for early detection and prevention of cardiac damage. The existing panel of markers with the important addition of troponin markers constitutes a reliable set of tools. However, other markers are needed to describe underlying and developing pathology in the early, transient stages of CVC which elude existing late-stage diagnostic and prognostic means. The technology of combining protease-driven ECMR and the resulting peptide fragment “fingerprints” as markers of ECM monitoring has provided a number of reliable markers for ECMR pathologies^{98,113,115,116,119} which recently included cardiac-specific events such as arterial remodelling.¹⁴⁰ The long timeline that separates risk factors which transiently develop to CVD-related pathology and ultimately cardiovascular death in the CVC include, as already described above, a large number of protease and protein interactions as key participants in ECMR. These protease and protein interactions could provide excellent markers of tissue remodelling closely reflecting different stages in the disease continuum (Figs. 2 and 3).

Figure 2.

Proteolytic activity by proteases such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is an important regulator of extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity in atherosclerosis, which is the central pathological feature of CVD. Interaction of different proteases combined with an altered ECM phenotype during atheroma formation and disease progression could result in a distinct neo epitope formation which could be used to monitor abnormal cardiac ECM remodelling and stage the disease. These neoepitopes are informative of protease activity, potential post- translational modifications of proteins, and tissue remodelling (A). Combining such biomarkers with a specific relationship to the location of atheroma formation could enable close monitoring of atherosclerosis progression (B).

Figure 3.

A proposed illustration of a biomarker continuum, which could facilitate disease staging by utilisation of specific biomarkers that correspond to precise extracellular matrix remodelling (ECMR) events.

Notes: A serum measurement of biomarkers would provide information on all atherosclerotic plaques and the underlying activity of both proteases and ECMR. For a specific clinical phenotype, the marker or combination of markers may provide more information on the specific number of plaques and degree of ECMR and protease activity, and thus of disease-staging.

The possibility that such CECMR fragments may also act as matrikines which affect cell activities via cell surface receptors further adds to the importance of accurate measurements of such fragments. Measuring these fragments could potentially reflect protease production, cell apoptosis, proliferation and migration. Cardiac-specific proteins and a detailed description of the precise proteolytic activity of proteases on these proteins in vivo could provide a prime resource of such biomarker development. The successful use of troponins suggests that other cardiac-specific proteins such as titin, which also have cardiac specific regions, could be identified as useful matrikines. During the identification of biomarkers, it would be helpful to investigate their tissue and disease stage-specific post-translational modifications (PTMs), which may add supplementary information for detailed disease-staging. We previously discussed that since PTMs are modifications that take place following protein translation and are not DNA-coded, their presence may be related to tissue physiology or pathology either as a cause or a consequence and could therefore be included in the design of tissue-specific biomarkers.¹⁴¹ Identification of specific PTMs and their association with specific time points of disease progression could add important information to the proposed biomarker continuum, thus creating a detailed disease staging network of biomarkers that are informative of underlying and developing pathology. Introduction and utilisation of well-described biomarkers that are closely related to CVD-staging could facilitate their classification to specific pathology-linked time points in a similar way as the BIPED criteria did for biomarkers in osteoarthritis¹⁴².

We believe that the main challenge of future biomarker translational research lies in the detailed mapping of tissue-specific relevant protein substrates, identification of tissue-specific acting proteases, and tissue-specific PTMs. These could be combined in biomarker development and concurrently increase our understanding of CVD initiation and progression. Biomarkers relating to the early transient stages of CVD could enable early intervention and modification of the path of such a commonplace, but often fatal, disease.