Abstract
Fc receptors and their interaction with antibodies will be a major theme at the forthcoming FASEB Science Research Conference on Immunoreceptors to be held in Snowmass this July (details available at www.faseb.org/src/home.aspx, follow the tabs for Immunoreceptors). Since its inception in the mid 1980s, this meeting series has maintained a focus on Fc receptors, and this year’s meeting will be no exception.
From a therapeutic viewpoint, there is much to be gained from a detailed understanding of the biology of effector molecules such as Fc receptors and complement. Indeed, knowledge of the interaction of IgG with such molecules has been central to the development of improved mAbs with altered functions and transformed half-lives, tailored for particular therapeutic applications. Examples include mAbs designed to maximise complement recruitment1 or to enhance Fc receptor engagement and triggering of ADCC,2-5 or conversely, variants engineered to be unable to engage complement6 or Fc receptors.7 Glycoengineering of IgG Fc offers an alternative means to modify effector function capabilities,8 while development of IgG mutants that display extended or altered serum half-lives has been driven through exhaustive analysis of the interaction with FcRn.9,10
Despite the appreciable advances that have been made in unravelling the various facets of Fc receptor biology, new information pertinent to mAb engineering continues to emerge. A flavour of some of these new advances will be given below. They span novel receptors and receptor roles, structure-function relationships, the molecular architecture of signaling complexes, the influence of the membrane lipid environment and scaffolding interactions, isotype considerations, through to technical innovations likely to inform the field.
Remarkably, new receptors that have previously eluded characterization are now being described. These include the IgM receptor, which evidence indicates is a molecule also known as TOPO/Fas apoptotic inhibitory molecule 3 whose gene lies close to other known immunoglobulin receptors on chromosome 1,11 and a receptor for IgD recently documented on basophils.12 Moreover, we are seeing an appreciation of new roles for existing Fc receptors. An example is the demonstration in a transgenic study that human FcγRIIa can trigger active and passive anaphylaxis and airway inflammation. Moreover, human mast cells, monocytes and neutrophils were shown to produce anaphylactogenic mediators when FcγRIIA was engaged.13 Hence IgG may contribute to allergic and anaphylactic reactions in humans by engaging FcγRIIa.
Exciting new structural information on Fc receptors and their ligands is emerging. An important example is the solving of the X-ray crystal structure for human FcγRI.14 While the structural information supports a ligand binding mode similar to those of FcγRII or FcγRIII, the FG-loop in domain 2 of FcγRI with its conserved one-residue deletion appears critical for high affinity IgG binding. A second example concerns the high responder/low responder (HR/LR) polymorphisms of FcγRIIa, which are linked to susceptibility to infections, autoimmune diseases, and the efficacy of therapeutic Abs. New insights into these differences have been provided by the recent solving of the structure for the complex of the HR allele with IgG Fc.15 Third, understanding of the human IgE-FcεRI interaction has moved forward significantly through the solving of the X-ray crystal structure of the complex of FcεRI and the entire Fc region of IgE (comprising domains Cε2, Cε3 and Cε4).16 In a final example, the structural basis for the improved efficacy of nonfucosylated mAbs has been investigated.17 The X-ray crystal structure of the complex between nonfucosylated IgG Fc and a soluble form of FcγRIIIa carrying two N-linked glycans showed that one of two receptor glycans interacts with nonfucosylated Fc to stabilize the complex. It is proposed that when the Fc glycan is fucosylated this interaction is inhibited due to steric hindrance and, together with the negative effects of Fc fucosylation on the dynamics of the receptor binding site, this provides a rationale for the improved ADCC displayed by nonfucosylated IgG.
A question of interest is precisely how Fc receptors bound to antibody ligands organize themselves within signaling complexes in the cell membrane. Some intriguing clues to this conundrum of molecular architecture are now surfacing. In mast cells, FcεRI molecules loaded with IgE form a synapse when presented with antigen that is mobile within a lipid bilayer, via coalescence into large cholesterol-rich clusters.18 Of particular relevance to the therapeutic setting, clustering of receptors into immune synapses is also seen with FcγR. For instance, during in vivo ADCC mediated by tumor-specific mAb, clustering of FcγR, actin and phosphotyrosines has been noted at contact zones between tumor cells and macrophages or neutrophils.19 The theme of the influence of the membrane lipid domain environment on Fc receptor function is taken up elsewhere. It has been shown, for example, that serine phosphorylation of FcγRI influences membrane mobility and function. The cytoplasmic tail of FcγRI interacts with protein 4.1G,20 and it is proposed that this is mediated via a phosphoserine-dependent mechanism critical for localization of the receptor to lipid rafts.21 With regard to FcγRIIa, a major role for lipid rafts in the regulation of IgG binding to FcγRIIa has been revealed.22 Notably, exclusion of FcγRIIa from lipid raft membrane microdomains is able to suppress IgG binding in myeloid cells.
Increased knowledge of the capabilities of Fc receptors specific for other antibody classes is opening up new options for therapy. For example, IgA antibodies may offer a highly useful and efficacious alternative approach of particular relevance to treatment at mucosal sites. Human IgA mAbs have been demonstrated to mediate efficient tumor cell killing23,24 and to have the capability to control certain infectious diseases.25,26 The detailed understanding of functional sites in IgA that has resulted from numerous mutagenesis studies,27 coupled with improved ways to produce and isolate recombinant IgA mAbs28 should facilitate developments toward therapeutics based on this immunoglobulin class. Similarly, recent studies indicate that IgE may serve as an alternative to the classic IgG backbone for therapeutic antibodies.29
Finally, technical innovations seem poised to further inform the field and advances are arriving or may be anticipated from techniques such as solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy,30 cryo-electron tomography,31 single particle tracking,32 and ultrasensitive force techniques such as adhesion frequency assays.33,34
Interest in Fc receptors continues unabated, and the contribution that the field can make to mAb development and optimisation is unquestionable. The FASEB SRC on Immunoreceptors will serve as a forum for discourse on the above issues and much more, providing invaluable information and networking opportunities for all those interested in ways to maximise the efficacy of mAbs and mAb-based reagents. Registration is open until 24 June 2012.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/mabs/article/20100
References
- 1.Moore GL, Chen H, Karki S, Lazar GA. Engineered Fc variant antibodies with enhanced ability to recruit complement and mediate effector functions. MAbs. 2010;2:181–9. doi: 10.4161/mabs.2.2.11158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lazar GA, Dang W, Karki S, Vafa O, Peng JS, Hyun L, et al. Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:4005–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508123103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oganesyan V, Damschroder MM, Leach W, Wu H, Dall’Acqua WF. Structural characterization of a mutated, ADCC-enhanced human Fc fragment. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:1872–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lu Y, Vernes JM, Chiang N, Ou Q, Ding J, Adams C, et al. Identification of IgG(1) variants with increased affinity to FcγRIIIa and unaltered affinity to FcγRI and FcRn: comparison of soluble receptor-based and cell-based binding assays. J Immunol Methods. 2011;365:132–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Horton HM, Bernett MJ, Peipp M, Pong E, Karki S, Chu SY, et al. Fc-engineered anti-CD40 antibody enhances multiple effector functions and exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity against hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2010;116:3004–12. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-265280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.An Z, Forrest G, Moore R, Cukan M, Haytko P, Huang L, et al. IgG2m4, an engineered antibody isotype with reduced Fc function. MAbs. 2009;1:572–9. doi: 10.4161/mabs.1.6.10185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaufman A, Herold KC. Anti-CD3 mAbs for treatment of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:302–6. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jefferis R. Glycosylation as a strategy to improve antibody-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:226–34. doi: 10.1038/nrd2804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vaccaro C, Zhou J, Ober RJ, Ward ES. Engineering the Fc region of immunoglobulin G to modulate in vivo antibody levels. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1283–8. doi: 10.1038/nbt1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oganesyan V, Damschroder MM, Woods RM, Cook KE, Wu H, Dall’acqua WF. Structural characterization of a human Fc fragment engineered for extended serum half-life. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1750–5. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kubagawa H, Oka S, Kubagawa Y, Torii I, Takayama E, Kang DW, et al. Identity of the elusive IgM Fc receptor (FcmuR) in humans. J Exp Med. 2009;206:2779–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen K, Xu W, Wilson M, He B, Miller NW, Bengtén E, et al. Immunoglobulin D enhances immune surveillance by activating antimicrobial, proinflammatory and B cell-stimulating programs in basophils. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:889–98. doi: 10.1038/ni.1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jönsson F, Mancardi DA, Zhao W, Kita Y, Iannascoli B, Khun H, et al. Human FcγRIIA induces anaphylactic and allergic reactions. Blood. 2012;119:2533–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-367334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu J, Ellsworth JL, Hamacher N, Oak SW, Sun PD. Crystal structure of Fcγ receptor I and its implication in high affinity γ-immunoglobulin binding. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:40608–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.257550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramsland PA, Farrugia W, Bradford TM, Sardjono CT, Esparon S, Trist HM, et al. Structural basis for Fc gammaRIIa recognition of human IgG and formation of inflammatory signaling complexes. J Immunol. 2011;187:3208–17. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Holdom MD, Davies AM, Nettleship JE, Bagby SC, Dhaliwal B, Girardi E, et al. Conformational changes in IgE contribute to its uniquely slow dissociation rate from receptor FcɛRI. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:571–6. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mizushima T, Yagi H, Takemoto E, Shibata-Koyama M, Isoda Y, Iida S, et al. Structural basis for improved efficacy of therapeutic antibodies on defucosylation of their Fc glycans. Genes Cells. 2011;16:1071–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01552.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carroll-Portillo A, Spendier K, Pfeiffer J, Griffiths G, Li H, Lidke KA, et al. Formation of a mast cell synapse: Fc ε RI membrane dynamics upon binding mobile or immobilized ligands on surfaces. J Immunol. 2010;184:1328–38. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hubert P, Heitzmann A, Viel S, Nicolas A, Sastre-Garau X, Oppezzo P, et al. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity synapses form in mice during tumor-specific antibody immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5134–43. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beekman JM, Bakema JE, van der Poel CE, van der Linden JA, van de Winkel JG, Leusen JH. Protein 4.1G binds to a unique motif within the Fc γ RI cytoplasmic tail. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:2069–75. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gibson AW, Li X, Wu J, Baskin JG, Raman C, Edberg JC, et al. Serine phosphorylation of FcγRI cytoplasmic domain directs lipid raft localization and interaction with protein 4.1G. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;91:97–103. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0711368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bournazos S, Hart SP, Chamberlain LH, Glennie MJ, Dransfield I. Association of FcgammaRIIa (CD32a) with lipid rafts regulates ligand binding activity. J Immunol. 2009;182:8026–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bakema JE, Ganzevles SH, Fluitsma DM, Schilham MW, Beelen RH, Valerius T, et al. Targeting FcαRI on polymorphonuclear cells induces tumor cell killing through autophagy. J Immunol. 2011;187:726–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lohse S, Derer S, Beyer T, Klausz K, Peipp M, Leusen JH, et al. Recombinant dimeric IgA antibodies against the epidermal growth factor receptor mediate effective tumor cell killing. J Immunol. 2011;186:3770–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Balu S, Reljic R, Lewis MJ, Pleass RJ, McIntosh R, van Kooten C, et al. A novel human IgA monoclonal antibody protects against tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2011;186:3113–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bakema JE, van Egmond M. Immunoglobulin A: A next generation of therapeutic antibodies? MAbs. 2011;3:352–61. doi: 10.4161/mabs.3.4.16092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Woof JM, Russell MW. Structure and function relationships in IgA. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:590–7. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beyer T, Lohse S, Berger S, Peipp M, Valerius T, Dechant M. Serum-free production and purification of chimeric IgA antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 2009;346:26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karagiannis SN, Josephs DH, Karagiannis P, Gilbert AE, Saul L, Rudman SM, et al. Recombinant IgE antibodies for passive immunotherapy of solid tumours: from concept towards clinical application. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1162-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Call ME, Chou JJ. A view into the blind spot: solution NMR provides new insights into signal transduction across the lipid bilayer. Structure. 2010;18:1559–69. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yahav T, Maimon T, Grossman E, Dahan I, Medalia O. Cryo-electron tomography: gaining insight into cellular processes by structural approaches. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21:670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spendier K, Lidke KA, Lidke DS, Thomas JL. Single-particle tracking of immunoglobulin E receptors (FcεRI) in micron-sized clusters and receptor patches. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:416–21. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zarnitsyna VI, Zhu C. Adhesion frequency assay for in situ kinetics analysis of cross-junctional molecular interactions at the cell-cell interface. J Vis Exp. 2011:e3519. doi: 10.3791/3519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shashidharamurthy R, Zhang F, Amano A, Kamat A, Panchanathan R, Ezekwudo D, et al. Dynamics of the interaction of human IgG subtype immune complexes with cells expressing R and H allelic forms of a low-affinity Fc gamma receptor CD32A. J Immunol. 2009;183:8216–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]