Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytometry A. 2012 Apr 6;81(6):445–446. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22036

A brilliant new addition to the fluorescent probe toolbox

Stephen C De Rosa 1,*
PMCID: PMC3358521  NIHMSID: NIHMS363149  PMID: 22488984

Fluorescent probes are critical for flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy. Although new probes are developed and introduced commercially each year, there are only a selected few that are exceptional in what we commonly refer to as brightness. One such probe, phycoerythrin (PE), was first reported thirty years ago in 1982 for use in cell analysis as an antibody conjugate (1). The use of a second probe, allophycocyanin (APC), was reported a year later (2). It wasn't until 1998 that another probe of comparable brightness, the quantum dot, was reported. Unique from all others, the quantum dot is inorganic (3). Quantum dot probes have been especially useful because they are optimally excited by ultraviolet and violet light, a spectral region with limited coverage from other bright fluorescent probes. Now, a new probe (Brilliant Violet, BV) of a different class but of comparable brightness and also excited by violet light has been developed as reported by Chattopadhyay et al. in this issue (pp XXX).

Although just ten years ago flow cytometry experiments measuring more than 6 parameters or 4 “colors” were limited to relatively few advanced laboratories, this capability is now much more widely distributed, including even some resource limited settings. One reason for this increased accessibility is introduction of off-the-shelf and custom-modified instrumentation with greater capacity for multi-color detection and another reason is the growing commercial availability of reagents consisting of conjugates to less common fluorescent probes. The expansion of multi-color technology makes use of fluorescent probes that are excited at a variety of wavelengths, and to allow for this, instrumentation has been modified by adding additional lasers of different colors. In addition to the nearly universal blue and red lasers, a violet laser exciting at about 405 nm is now commonly included in many instruments (4).

Initially, there were very few fluorescent probes excited by the violet laser and they were dismal in terms of brightness. Soon, better probes and commercial conjugates became available although none rivaled the brightness of PE and APC. Therefore, the introduction of quantum dots caused a great amount of excitement not only because of their brightness, but also because of the selection of different colors all excited by the violet laser. Although quantum dots continue to be extremely useful, the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by some practical issues such as shelf-life, sensitivity to heavy metal contaminants and cross-laser compensation requirements that became more evident as they were included in multi-color panels (5). Thus, alternate violet-excited bright fluorescent probes are likely to be of benefit to many researchers (6).

The intrinsic brightness of a fluorescent compound is a function of the quantum yield and the molar extinction coefficient. The quantum yield is the probability of emitting a photon once a photon of light is absorbed and thus is a measure of the efficiency of energy conversion. High quantum yields are optimal and the quantum yield for BV is comparable to many other bright fluorochromes (Table 1). The molar extinction coefficient is a measure of the probability of absorbing a photon of light at the wavelength of excitation and this is the measure that is exceptional for PE, APC, the quantum dots and now BV. Other factors also affect the brightness of antibody conjugates such as the number of fluorophores conjugated to each antibody, but these intrinsic factors have a dominant effect (7).

Table 1.

Quantum yield and extinction coefficient for commonly-use fluorescent probes

Fluorochrome Quantum Yield Molar Extinction Coefficienta Excitation/ Absorbance
Brilliant Violet 0.69 2,500,000 Violet (405 nm)
R-PE 0.82 1,960,000 Blue (496 nm)
APC 0.68 700,000 Red (650 nm)
Quantum Dot 655 ≈0.3b 5,700,000 Violet (405 nm)
Quantum Dot 585 ≈0.7b 2,200,000 Violet (405 nm)
AlexaFluor 660 0.37 132,000 Red (663 nm)
Fluorescein 0.5 86,000 Blue (488 nm)
AlexaFluor 488 0.92 71,000 Blue (495 nm)
Pacific Blue 0.78 46,000 Violet (405 nm)
a

Measured at the indicated excitation/absorbance wavelength, cm-1M-1

b

Quantum yields generally increase for larger Quantum Dots (11)

The new fluorescent probe reported in this issue of Cytometry is a unique type of fluorescent compound with a fascinating pedigree stemming from a discovery that earned the Nobel prize in chemistry in 2000. The discovery and development of conductive polymers has yielded many applications already in use in commercial products. The BV fluorescent probe resulted from chemical modifications to a polymer that yielded the appropriate excitation spectrum, water solubility, conjugation ability and minimal non-specific binding. Additional violet-excited fluorescent probes with differing emission spectra have been developed by creating tandem dyes of BV conjugated with more traditional fluorophores such as Cy3 (the BV570 tandem dye reported in this issue).

In this issue Chattopadhyay and colleagues report (pp XXX) on the use of these new dyes as antibody conjugates and as a streptavidin conjugate used with pMHCI multimers. The comparison of the BV421 conjugates with the Pacific Blue conjugates demonstrates their remarkable brightness, with the CD8 conjugate about 10-fold brighter as quantified by the stain index. Thus, the exceptional molar extinction coefficient translates into bright cell staining reagents. The authors also demonstrate suitable photostability and utility in fluorescence microscopy. Although only one tandem dye was tested, it is likely that a series of bright tandem dyes based on the Brilliant Violet backbone are forthcoming and will be a welcome addition to the ever growing arsenal of fluorescent probes available to cytometrists.

Multicolor flow cytometry continues to be a cornerstone of immunological and cellular profiling. Although it is inevitable that new technologies will enter the field, such as non-fluorescent based flow cytometry (CyTOF) using mass spectrometry, where reagent labels are distinguished by mass and there is much less expertise required to assemble and optimize cell staining panels examining large numbers of markers (8), it is unlikely that they will replace fluorescent-based flow cytometry, at least in the near future. Thus, the art and science of creating staining panels remain important (9,10) and Brilliant Violet and its tandem dyes are useful additions to the toolbox of fluorescent probes. Indeed, there is a bright future for Brilliant Violet.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the HIV Vaccine Trials Network Laboratory Program, a cooperative agreement with the National Institutes of Health Division of AIDS (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) (UM1 AI068618). This work was also supported through the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research, a National Institutes of Health-funded program (P30 AI027757). The author thanks Stephen Voght for help with editing.

Literature Cited

  • 1.Oi VT, Glazer AN, Stryer L. Fluorescent phycobiliprotein conjugates for analyses of cells and molecules. J Cell Biol. 1982;93:981–6. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shapiro HM, Glazer AN, Christenson L, Williams JM, Strom TB. Immunofluorescence measurement in a flow cytometer using low-power helium-neon laser excitation. Cytometry. 1983;4:276–9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990040314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bruchez M, Jr., Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science. 1998;281:2013–6. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shapiro HM, Perlmutter NG. Violet laser diodes as light sources for cytometry. Cytometry. 2001;44:133–6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010601)44:2<133::aid-cyto1092>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chattopadhyay PK. Quantum dot technology in flow cytometry. Methods Cell Biol. 2011;102:463–77. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374912-3.00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Telford WG, Hawley TS, Hawley RG. Analysis of violet-excited fluorochromes by flow cytometry using a violet laser diode. Cytometry A. 2003;54A:48–55. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haugland RP. The Handbook: A guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies. Invitrogen Corp.; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bendall SC, Simonds EF, Qiu P, Amir el AD, Krutzik PO, Finck R, Bruggner RV, Melamed R, Trejo A, Ornatsky OI. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. 2011;332:687–96. doi: 10.1126/science.1198704. others. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mahnke Y, Chattopadhyay P, Roederer M. Publication of optimized multicolor immunofluorescence panels. Cytometry A. 2010;77A:814–8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mahnke YD, Roederer M. Optimizing a multicolor immunophenotyping assay. Clin Lab Med. 2007;27:469–85, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grabolle M, Spieles M, Lesnyak V, Gaponik N, Eychmuller A, Resch-Genger U. Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6285–6294. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES