Skip to main content
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2012 May 1;2012:710501. doi: 10.1100/2012/710501

Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains Isolated from Soil and Water

Edyta Konecka 1,*, Jakub Baranek 1, Anita Hrycak 1, Adam Kaznowski 1
PMCID: PMC3361314  PMID: 22666145

Abstract

We attempted to search novel Bacillus thuringiensis strains that produce crystals with potential utility in plant protection and with higher activity than strains already used in biopesticide production. Seven B. thuringiensis soil and water isolates were used in the research. We predicted the toxicity of their crystals by cry gene identification employing PCR method. The isolate MPU B63 with interesting, according to us, genes content was used in evaluating its crystal toxicity against Cydia pomonella caterpillars. The strain MPU B63 was cultured from water sample and had cry1Ab, cry1B, and cry15 genes. The LC50 crystals of MPU B63 were compared to LC50 of commercial bioinsecticide Foray determined against C. pomonella (codling moth). The activity of MPU B63 inclusions against codling moth larvae was approximately 24-fold higher than that of Foray. The results are a promising introduction for further study evaluating the potential usefulness of isolate MPU B63 crystals in plant protection.

1. Introduction

Biopreparations based on spore-crystals mixtures of Bacillus thuringiensis seem to be a good alternative for chemical pesticides. They are environment friendly, do not have a negative influence on nontarget animals, including vertebrates, and are effective in reducing the number of insect pests [1]. However, novel B. thuringiensis isolates with higher and broader spectrum of activity are searching in their natural habitats. New strains are cultured from samples collected from soil [2], leaves [3], dead insects [4], and other sources [57].

Bacteria B. thuringiensis produce crystals comprised of Cry and Cyt proteins active against insect pest [8]. Sixty-eight groups of Cry and 3 groups of Cyt toxins have been known [9]. The toxicity of the most Cry and Cyt proteins are determined [10]. The knowledge on crystal composition leads to prediction of its potential activity [5]. An effective tool in estimating the utility of crystals against pests is identification of genes coding for insecticidal toxins [11]. For example, genes cry1, cry2, cry7, cry8, cry9, cry15, cry22, cry51, and cyt1 code for proteins active against Lepidoptera pests [10]. Similarly, cry54 codes for protein that is harmful to moths [12]. Other cry genes determine the synthesis proteins toxic for insects of Diptera [13, 14], Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, Siphonoptera [10], Homoptera, Orthoptera, and Phthiraptera orders [15]. Furthermore, detection of cry genes by PCR method enables discovering genes of novel crystalline toxins [11].

The protection of plants against some insects can be difficult. An example is protection of fruit trees against codling moth (Cydia pomonella) from Lepidoptera order. The pest forms tunnels inside the fruit and is hardly available for insecticides dispersed on the fruit surface. Moreover, C. pomonella is resistant to most chemical pesticides [16].

We cultured B. thuringiensis strains from samples of soil and water in searching for novel isolates synthesizing crystals with high and wide insecticidal activity. We determined the potential toxicity of their crystalline inclusions by detection of cry gene profiles with PCR technique. The isolate with interesting, according to us, gene content was used in evaluating its crystal activity against C. pomonella caterpillars.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria

Seven Bacillus thuringiensis strains were used in the study (Table 1). Six bacterial isolates were cultured from soil samples. One strain was obtained from water of forest stream. The soil samples of 1 g were suspended in 10 mL 0.85% NaCl and heated with shaking at 80°C for 12 min. Aliquots of 100 μL of suspension were plated on Bacillus cereus selective agar with egg's yolk polimixin emulsion (Biocorp, Poland) [17]. Bacterial colonies were displaced onto M.B.Th medium [18]. After 5 days of incubation, the culture stained with amino black and Ziehl's carbol fuchsin [19] was examined applying a standard light microscope. B. thuringiensis strain was recognized when black crystals dyed black were noticed.

Table 1.

Genes of Cry toxins in B. thuringiensis isolates cultured from samples of soil and water.

Strain designation Source of isolation or reference cry genes
MPU B130 Soil cry1Aa, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1I, 2Ab, 9B, 9E
MPU B31 Soil cry1Aa, 1Ab, 1Ac, 1I, 2Aa, 2Ab
MPU B32 Soil cry1Aa, 1Ab, 1Ac, 1I, 2Aa, 2Ab
MPU B55 Soil cry1Aa, 1C, 1D, 1I, 2Ab, 9B, 9E
MPU B61 Soil cry1Ab, 1Ac, 1I, 2Aa, 2Ab
MPU B62 Soil cry1Ac, 1I, 2Aa, 2Ab
MPU B63 Water cry1Ab, 1B, 15

1 Collection of Department of Microbiology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.

2.2. Prediction of B. thuringiensis Insecticidal Toxicity by Crystalline Protein Genes Detection

Identification of cry genes was conducted by using PCR method with specific primers. DNA of the strains was extracted by boiling the bacterial cells [20]. One μg of bacterial DNA was added to the PCR mixture containing 2.5 μL 10 × PCR buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 μL 5 mM dNTP, 0.25 μM of appropriate pair of primers, 1 U of HiFi Taq DNA polymerase, and sterile distilated water to 25 μL of suspension. The PCR reagents were purchased from Novazym (Poland) and Oligo.pl (Poland). The sequences of primers and temperature of PCR annealing for cry1 gene were done according to Ben-Dov et al. [21]. The subgroups of cry1 genes were identified according to Juárez-Pérez et al. [22], Monnerat et al. [23], and Masson et al. [24]. Masson et al. [24] also described the primers and PCR conditions for cry6. Primer sequences and PCR steps for cry2 gene, its subgroups, and cry3, cry4, and cry7/8 genes were presented by Ben-Dov et al. [21]. PCR for the presence of cry5, cry12, cry14, cry21, cry13, cyt1Aa and cyt1Ab genes was conducted according to Bravo et al. [25]. Primer sequences and steps of PCR for cry9 and the gene subgroups detection were accomplished as proposed by Ben-Dov et al. [26]. Identification of cry15, cry16, cry18, cry20, cry22, cry25, cry26, cry28, and cyt2 genes was described by Ejiofor and Johnson [6]. The amplification for cry10, cry17, cry24, cry27, cry29, cry30, cry32 and cry40 genes was conducted as depicted by Ibarra et al. [13]. Identification of cry19 and cry39 genes was done according to instruction of Salehi Jouzani et al. [27].

The gene amplifications were carried out in MyCycler Termal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). The PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel NOVA Mini (Novazym, Poland), stained with ethidium bromide and documented with Bio-Print V.99 System (Vilber Lourmat, France). The sizes of amplicons were estimated by GelCompar II 3.5 software (Applied Maths, Belgium).

2.3. Activity of B. thuringiensis Crystals against C. pomonella Caterpillars

The activity of B. thuringiensis crystals against C. pomonella was determined with applying the strain MPU B63 with cry1Ab, cry1B, and cry15 genes. The B. thuringiensis strain was cultured on M.B.Th medium for 5 days during sporulation. The mixture of spores and crystals was collected, washed with 1 M NaCl and then in distilated sterile water [28]. The spore-crystal mixture was suspended in 50 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM KCl, and pH 7.5 and placed on sucrose density gradient (67%, 72%, 79%, and 87%). After centrifugation, the layer of crystals was gathered and washed in sterile distilated water [29].

The number of crystals in the suspension was evaluated in a Bűrker cell. Five dilutions of toxins (102–106) were prepared and applied to two-day-old Cydia pomonella caterpillars. The spore-crystal mixture of commercial pesticide Foray was prepared in the same manner, at the same time, and using the same conditions as for MPU B63. The larvae were cultured on medium according to Guennelon et al. [30]. The suspension of MPU B63 crystals or Foray spore-crystal preparation with known concentrations was spread on the medium surface. The larvae are cannibalistic; therefore, they were reared individually at a 16 : 8 (day : night) period, 26°C and 40–60% humidity. The number of dead insects was estimated after 7 days.

The 50% lethal concentration (LC50) of MPU B63 crystals against C. pomonella was calculated by using probit analysis with the consideration of dead caterpillars in control sample [31]. The obtained value was compared to LC50 commercial bioinsecticide Foray determined against C. pomonella. The insecticidal activity of Foray preparation is 21200 IU/mg. The potency (IU/mg) of isolate MPU B63 was counted using the following formula [32]: potency of isolate crystals (IU/mg) = [LC50 of Foray × potency of Foray (IU/mg)]/LC50 of isolate crystals.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Crystalline Toxin Genes

The B. thuringiensis strains had from three to eight crystalline toxin genes. We found that the isolates had cry1Aa, cry1Ab, cry1Ac, cry1B, cry1C, cry1D, cry1I, cry2Aa cry2Ab, cry9B, cry9E, and cry15. The obtained results are given in Table 1.

B. thuringienis soil isolates harbored cry1, cry2 and cry9 genes. Strain MPU B63 cultured from water possessed cry1 and cry15 genes. The cry1A gene was present in all isolates. All B. thuringiensis strains obtained from soil samples carried cry2A and cry1I. Strains with cry1C had also cry1D, cry9B, and cry9E. The soil isolate MPU B30 had large number and diversity of cry genes; it possessed cry1Aa, cry1B, cry1C, cry1D, cry1I, cry2Ab, cry9B, and cry9E genes. The amplicons of some cry gene are shown in Figure 1. None of the isolates had cry1J, cry1K, cry5, cry6, cry7, cry8, cry11, cry12, cry13, cry14, cry16, cry17, cry18, cry19, cry20, cry21, cry22, cry24, cry26, cry27, cry28, cry29, cry30, cry32, cry 39, cry40, cyt1, and cyt2 genes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Amplicon of cry15 gene of B. thuringiensis MPU B63 strain is presented in panel a on the left. Amplicons of cry1Aa gene of B. thuringiensis MPU B30, MPU B31, and MPU B32 strains are presented in panel b on the right. Lanes: M. MassRuler DNA Ladder, Mix (10000, 8000, 6000, 5000, 4000, 3000, 2500, 1500, 1031, 900, 800, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 200 bp), 63. B. thuringiensis MPU B63, 30. B. thuringiensis MPU B30, 31. B. thuringiensis MPU B31, 32. B. thuringiensis MPU B32.

3.2. Toxicity of B. thuringiensis MPU B63 Crystals for Cydia pomonella Larvae

The strain MPU B63 was chosen to determine its crystal activity due to unique cry gene profile. The isolate had cry15 gene. The LC50 value of MPU B63 toxins against C. pomonella was 1.55 × 105 crystals per larva. The obtained value was compared to the LC50 of commercial biopesticide Foray containing spores and crystals of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki that is recommended to protect plants against lepidopteran insects. LC50 of Foray for C. pomonella was 3.69 × 106 spores and crystals per larva (Table 2). The LC50 of MPU B63 crystals was approximately 24-fold lower than LC50 of bioinsecticide against C. pomonella caterpillars. The potency of MPU B63 toxins was approximately 890 IU/mg, and it was higher than the potency of Foray.

Table 2.

The 50% lethal concentration (LC50) of crystals of B. thuringiensis MPU B63 and Foray for C. pomonella caterpillars.

Preparation LC50 value on insect caterpillars [crystals per larva] Confidence interval 95%
Crystal mixture of MPU B63 1.55 × 105 5.89 × 104–4.11 × 105
Spore-crystal mixture of Foray 3.69 × 106 5.7 × 105–2.39 × 107

4. Discussion

Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria are ubiquitous in soil [2, 13, 33, 34], dead larvae [4], sand [5], leaves [3], water [7], or dust from stored grains [6]. Wild strains isolated form environmental samples can synthesize crystals that display higher activity against insect pests in comparison to B. thuringiensis strains already used in pesticide production. We attempted to culture B. thuringiensis isolates from soil and water samples and estimate their potential usefulness in plant protection.

The knowledge on coding for genes toxins in crystalline inclusion is useful in predicting potential pathogenicity of B. thuringiensis isolates against insects [5, 7, 11]. Cry1 toxins display activity against lepidopteran, dipteran, and coleopteran pests. Cry2 genes code for crystalline proteins toxic for Diptera and Hemiptera. Cry9 proteins indicate activity against insects of Coleoptera and Lepidoptera order. Cry15 is toxic for lepidopteran pests [10]. Two of soil-isolated strains (MPU B30 and MPU B55) had genes of Cry1, Cry2, and Cry9 toxins. Other B. thuringiensis isolates cultured from soil possessed cry1 and cry2 genes. Their crystals showed potential activity against pests of Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, and Lepidoptera. Water-isolated strain harbored genes coding Cry1 and Cry15 toxins that indicate the crystals activity against coleopteran, dipteran, and lepidopteran insects.

All isolates had cry1 gene, and seven of eight strains harbored cry2 gene. These genes were also noted as the most frequent in B. thuringiensis strains [2, 3, 5, 6, 33, 34]. All analyzed B. thuringiensis harbored cry1I genes that have been reported as the most abundant in B. thuringiensis isolates [11]. Soil-isolated strains with cry1A possessed also cry2A gene, which is with agreement in notice done by Saadaoui et al. [3] in strains from soil samples collected in Tunisia. We observed that strains with cry1C had also cry1D, cry9B, and cry9E.

Strain B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 applied in production of insecticide Foray harbored cry1Aa, 1Ab, 1Ac, 1I, 2Aa, 2Ab, and 2Ac genes [35]. Soil isolate MPU B30 had the largest number of cry genes among the isolates analyzed (Table 1). In comparison to Foray, it additionally carries cry1B, cry1C, cry1D, cry9B, and cry9E genes, which can indicate wider spectrum of toxicity and higher insecticidal activity of their crystals than the commercial insecticide. Our attention was directed to MPU B63 with cry15 gene isolated from water sample. The gene is rarely detected in environmental isolates [6], and only a few reports about its activity against lepidopteran insects have been published [3638]. We isolated crystalline inclusions of MPU B63 strain, evaluated their insecticidal activity towards C. pomonella, and compared with the activity of Foray recommended to protect plants against insect of Lepidoptera order.

The activity of MPU B63 crystals against C. pomonella caterpillars was approximately 24-fold higher than Foray pesticide. It indicates the contribution of MPU B63 toxins that are not possessed by B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 used in Foray production. Strain MPU B63 had cry1B and cry15 genes that were not identified in HD-1 strain. The activity of Cry1B [39] and Cry15 [37] proteins for codling moth has been reported. Cry15 is a binary toxin. It occurs in crystal together with another protein of 40-kDa molecular mass that is active only with the presence of Cry15 [36, 40]. According to Naimov et al. [37], the role of 40-kDa protein is to form crystal and to achieve higher Cry15 levels. Its absence results in Cry15 degradation. The mode of action of binary crystalline toxins is unknown, but it was found that Cry15 has nonspecific pore-forming activity and displays hemolysis on mouse erythrocytes [37].

Our searching for a novel isolate producing crystals with higher activity than commercial biopesticide revealed the MPU B63 strain. The toxicity of Foray insecticide was approximately 24-fold lower compared to that of MPU B63 crystals. The results are a starting point for future research determining potential usefulness of MPU B63 isolate in plant protection.

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by Grant no. N N310 079936 from science funding in years 2009–2012.

References

  • 1.Joung KB, Côté JCh. A review of the environmental impacts of the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis . Technical Bulletin. 2000;29:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liang H, Liu Y, Zhu J, et al. Characterization of cry2-type genes of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from soilisolated of Sichuan basin, China. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2011;42(1):140–146. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000100018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saadaoui I, Al-Thani R, Al-Saadi F, et al. Characterization of tunisian Bacillus thuringiensis strains with abundance of kurstaki subspecies harbouring insecticidal activities against the lepidopteran insect Ephestia kuehniella . Current Microbiology. 2010;61(6):541–548. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9650-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Valicente FH, de Toledo Picoli EA, de Vasconcelos MJV, et al. Molecular characterization and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis cry1 genes from Brazilian strains effective against the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda . Biological Control. 2010;53(3):360–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baig DN, Mehnaz S. Determination and distribution of cry-type genes in halophilc Bacillus thuringiensis isolates of Arabian Sea sedimentary rocks. Microbiological Research. 2010;165(5):376–383. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ejiofor AO, Johnson T. Physiological and molecular detection of crystalliferous Bacillus thuringiensis strains from habitats in the South Central United States. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2002;28(5):284–290. doi: 10.1038/sj/jim/7000244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hernández-Rodríguez CS, Ferré J. Ecological distribution and characterization of four collections of Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2009;49(2):152–157. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200800121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ibrahim MA, Griko N, Junker M, Bulla LA. Bacillus thuringiensis A genomics and proteomics perspective. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010;1(1):31–50. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.1.10519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crickmore N. Full list of delta-endotoxin. 2011, http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/
  • 10.Frankenhuyzen KV. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2009;101(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nazarian A, Jahangiri R, Jouzani GS, et al. Coleopteran-specific and putative novel cry genes in Iranian native Bacillus thuringiensis collection. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2009;102(2):101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan F, Zhu J, Tang J, et al. Cloning and characterization of two novel crystal protein genes, cry54Aa1 and cry30Fa1, from Bacillus thuringiensis strain BtMC28. Current Microbiology. 2009;58(6):654–659. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9386-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ibarra JE, Del Rincón MC, Ordúz S, et al. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Latin America with insecticidal activity against different mosquito species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69(9):5269–5274. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5269-5274.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zeigler DR. Bacillus thuringiensis & Bacillus cereus. Bacillus Genetic Stock Center Catalog of Strains. 7th edition. Vol. 2. USA: The Ohio State University; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1998;62(3):775–806. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.3.775-806.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mota-Sanchez D, Wise JC, Poppen RV, Gut LJ, Hollingworth RM. Resistance of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), larvae in Michigan to insecticides with different modes of action and the impact on field residual activity. Pest Management Science. 2008;64(9):881–890. doi: 10.1002/ps.1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Swiecicka I, Bideshi DK, Federici BA. Novel isolate of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thuringiensis that produces a quasicuboidal crystal of Cry1Ab21 toxic to larvae of Trichoplusia ni . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74(4):923–930. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01955-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lecadet MM, Cosmao Dumanoir V, Frachon E, Ripouteau H. Collection of Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus (classified by H Serotypes) International Entomopathomogenic Bacillus Centre, W. H. O. Collaborating Centre, Institut Pasteur Paris, France, Catalogue No 1,1994.
  • 19.Smirnoff WA. A staining method for differentiating spores, crystals, and cells of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) Journal of Insect Pathology. 1962;4:384–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brousseau R, Saint-Onge A, Prefontaine G, Masson L, Cabana J. Arbitrary primer polymerase chain reaction, a powerful method to identify Bacillus thuringiensis serovars and strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1993;59(1):114–119. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.1.114-119.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ben-Dov E, Zaritsky A, Dahan E, et al. Extended screening by PCR for seven cry-group genes from field-collected strains of Bacillus thuringiensis . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63(12):4883–4890. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4883-4890.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Juárez-Pérez VM, Ferrandis MD, Frutos R. PCR-based approach for detection of novel Bacillus thuringiensis cry genes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63(8):2997–3002. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.2997-3002.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Monnerat R, Martins E, Queiroz P, et al. Genetic variability of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations from Latin America is associated with variations in susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis cry toxins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(11):7029–7035. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01454-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masson L, Erlandson M, Puzstai-Carey M, Brousseau R, Juárez-Pérez V, Frutos R. A holistic approach for determining the entomopathogenic potential of Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64(12):4782–4788. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.12.4782-4788.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bravo A, Sarabia S, Lopez L, et al. Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64(12):4965–4972. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.12.4965-4972.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ben-Dov E, Wang Q, Zaritsky A, et al. Multiplex PCR screening to detect cry9 genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65(8):3714–3716. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.8.3714-3716.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salehi Jouzani G, Pourjan Abad A, Seifinejad A, Marzban R, Kariman K, Maleki B. Distribution and diversity of Dipteran-specific cry and cyt genes in native Bacillus thuringiensis strains obtained from different ecosystems of Iran. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;35(2):83–94. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0269-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu YS, Brookes A, Carlson K, Filner P. Separation of protein crystals from spores of Bacillus thuringiensis by Ludox gradient centrifugation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1989;55(5):1279–1281. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.5.1279-1281.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guz K, Kucińska J, Lonc E, Doroszkiewicz W. Differentiated pattern of protein composition of crystalline inclusions of newly isolated Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Silesia in Poland. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2005;54(4):263–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guennelon G, Audemard H, Fremond JC, El Idrissi Ammari MA. Progrés réalisés dans l’élevage permanent du Carpocapse (Laspeyresia pomonella L.) sur milieu artificiel. Agronomie. 1981;1:59–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Finney DJ. Probit Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1952. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Beegle CC, Couch TL, Alls RT, et al. Standarization of HD-1-S-1980: U.S. Standard for Assay of Lepidopterous - active Bacillus thuringiensis . Bulletin of Entomological Society of America. 1986;32:44–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Armengol G, Escobar MC, Maldonado ME, Orduz S. Diversity of Colombian strains of Bacillus thuringiensis with insecticidal activity against dipteran and lepidopteran insects. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2007;102(1):77–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.López-Pazos SA, Martínez JW, Castillo AX, Salamanca JAC. Presence and significance of Bacillus thuringiensis cry proteins associated with the andean weevil premnotrypes vorax (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Revista de Biologia Tropical. 2009;57(4):1235–1243. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v57i4.5460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Konecka E, Kaznowski A, Ziemnicka J, Ziemnicki K, Paetz H. Analysis of cry gene profiles in Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated during epizootics in Cydia pomonella L. Current Microbiology. 2007;55(3):217–222. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-0085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brown KL, Whiteley HR. Molecular characterization of two novel crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thompsoni . Journal of Bacteriology. 1992;174(2):549–557. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.2.549-557.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Naimov S, Boncheva R, Karlova R, Dukiandjiev S, Minkov I, De Maagd RA. Solubilization, activation, and insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar thompsoni HD542 crystal proteins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74(23):7145–7151. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00752-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rang C, Lacey LA, Frutos R. The crystal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thompsoni display a synergistic activity against the codling moth, Cydia pomonella . Current Microbiology. 2000;40(3):200–204. doi: 10.1007/s002849910040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boncheva R, Dukiandjiev S, Minkov I, de Maagd RA, Naimov S. Activity of Bacillus thuringiensisδ-endotoxins against codling moth (Cydia pomonella L.) larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2006;92(2):84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.De Maagd RA, Bravo A, Berry C, Crickmore N, Schnepf HE. Structure, diversity, and evolution of protein toxins from spore-forming entomopathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Genetics. 2003;37:409–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES