Abstract
Graphene has attracted enormous attention for radio-frequency transistor applications because of its exceptional high carrier mobility, high carrier saturation velocity, and large critical current density. Herein we report a new approach for the scalable fabrication of high-performance graphene transistors with transferred gate stacks. Specifically, arrays of gate stacks are first patterned on a sacrificial substrate, and then transferred onto arbitrary substrates with graphene on top. A self-aligned process, enabled by the unique structure of the transferred gate stacks, is then used to position precisely the source and drain electrodes with minimized access resistance or parasitic capacitance. This process has therefore enabled scalable fabrication of self-aligned graphene transistors with unprecedented performance including a record-high cutoff frequency up to 427 GHz. Our study defines a unique pathway to large-scale fabrication of high-performance graphene transistors, and holds significant potential for future application of graphene-based devices in ultra–high-frequency circuits.
Keywords: cut-off frequency, transfer gate
Graphene is of considerable interest as a potential new electronic material (1–10). In particular, it has attracted enormous attention for radio-frequency transistor applications owing to its exceptional high carrier mobility, high carrier saturation velocity, and large current density (11–17). However, the fabrication of high-performance graphene transistors is a significant challenge because conventional steps in the device-fabrication process often introduce undesired damage into graphene lattice, degrading its electronic performance or resulting in nonideal device geometry with excessive parasitic capacitance or serial resistance (18–20). The recent development of self-aligned graphene transistors with nanowire gates can address these challenges, and has enabled graphene transistors with the highest intrinsic cutoff frequency—up to 300 GHz (14). Moving forward to the terahertz regime requires high-quality graphene material, damage-free dielectric integration strategy, and self-aligned device layout. The strategy of physical assembling nanowire gate is promising for addressing the latter two problems. On the other hand, the scalability of this approach is complicated by the requirement of unconventional nanowire-assembly processes. Instead of fighting with the difficulty of nanowire assembly, here we report a scalable approach to high-performance graphene transistors by transferring lithographically patterned gate stacks onto graphene as the self-aligned top gate to demonstrate the highest cutoff frequency (up to 427 GHz).
Results and Discussion
Fig. 1 illustrates our approach to fabrication of the self-aligned graphene transistors with transferred gate stacks. A 50-nm gold thin film is first deposited on a Si/SiO2 substrate by e-beam evaporation. This gold film is served as the sacrificial substrate in the transferring process. Subsequently, we build the (Al2O3/Ti/Au) gate stacks on top of the gold film by standard atomic layer deposition (ALD), lithography, and reactive ion etching (RIE) processes (Fig. 1A and B). The gate sidewall spacer is formed by depositing a thin-layer Al2O3 film using ALD approach (Fig. 1C), followed by an anisotropic RIE process to etch away unwanted Al2O3 film on the top surface of the gate metal and the substrate (Fig. 1D). Because of the limited affinity between the sacrificial Au film and the SiO2 underneath, the fabricated gate stacks are easily peeled off by thermal release tape. Additionally, to facilitate peeling off and releasing, a thin layer of polymer that has glass transition temperature close to the thermal tape–releasing temperature is spin-cast before peeling off the gate stacks. Therefore, the patterned top-gate stacks are sandwiched between the gold layer and the polymer layer for peeling off from the Si wafer (Fig. 1E). After Au etching, the gate stacks can be readily transferred onto desired graphene substrate through a thermal releasing process (Fig. 1F). Compared to other releasing methods, such as lateral undercut etching of the sacrificial layer underneath, mechanical peeling is much faster and has lower chemical degradation or contamination to the releasing structure. Moreover, the flexible nature of our approach is compatible with roll-to-roll transfer process, demonstrating high potential for printable electronics (21). The chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene is grown on copper foil and transferred onto arbitrary substrates, such as silicon, glass, and plastic (22, 23) (see SI Methods and Fig. S1). After transferring the gate stacks, external source, drain, and gate connections are formed by conventional lithography and metallization process. Finally, a thin layer of Pd/Au (5 nm/10 nm) is used to form the self-aligned source and drain electrodes, which are separated by the gate spacer dielectrics (Fig. 1H and I).
The described fabrication approach is intrinsically scalable, and compatible to various substrates, such as silicon, glass, and plastics. As shown in Fig. 2, arrays of self-aligned graphene transistors with uniform device geometry and spacing are demonstrated on glass (Fig. 2A) and 300-nm Si/SiO2 substrate (Fig. 2B). Fig. 2C shows a SEM image of the top view of an individual self-aligned graphene transistor. The cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) image shows that the self-aligned source and drain electrodes are well-separated and precisely positioned next to the gate spacer dielectrics (Fig. 2D). Because the device performance is essentially determined by the structure of the individual gate stack and the self-aligned source drain electrodes, the relatively large gap between external source drain lead electrodes may not affect the device performance, but rather makes the device more tolerant to the transfer-induced misalignment and distortion of the gate stacks arrangement.
The conventional dielectric integration approach can often introduce substantial defects into graphene lattice and degrade its electronic performance (e.g., carrier mobility). To investigate the impact of our transferring method on graphene carrier mobility, we have studied the electrical performance and carrier mobility distribution of more than 20 graphene transistors (in the back-gate configuration) before and after dielectric integration. Here, the CVD-grown graphene is patterned by photolithography with a channel length of approximately 8 μm and a channel width of approximately 8 μm. The effective mobility values are extracted from the drain source current (Ids) versus the back-gated voltage (VBG) (Ids–VBG) curve. Importantly, a histogram of the mobility value shows that the CVD-grown graphene exhibits a similar mobility distribution in the range of 1,000–2,000 cm2/V·s before and after the transfer dielectric integration process (Fig. 3A). These studies clearly demonstrate our transfer gate approach does not lead to an obvious degradation of the electronic performance of the graphene.
Fig. 3B–F depicts the room-temperature electrical transport characteristics of the self-aligned graphene transistors. Before characterizing the transistor properties of our self-aligned devices, gate leakage current (Igs) from the gate stack to the underlying graphene is measured from -4-V to 4-V gate voltage, which indicates the gate leakage current is negligible during the measurement (Fig. S2). Fig. 3B shows the Ids–Vds output characteristic of a 300-nm channel-length self-aligned graphene transistor at various gate voltages. The maximum scaled on-current of 1.73 mA μm-1 can be achieved at Vds = -1V with slight current saturation. The current saturation is desirable for the power gain performance in radio-frequency (rf) graphene transistors (10).
The Ids–VTG curve of the same device is measured at different drain bias from 100 mV to 600 mV, with the top-gate voltage sweeps from 0 V to 3 V (Fig. 3C). It shows a typical characteristic of p-type doping with the Dirac points located at positive top-gate voltage, and can be attributed to oxygen doping that occurred during the growth or transfer processes (10). Overall, the hole-transport branch can switch from saturation current to Dirac point within 2 V of top-gate voltage sweeping, indicating a strong top-gate capacitance coupling. In general, these top-gated self-aligned graphene transistors exhibit a very small Ids–VTG hysteresis of approximately 0.1 V or less, demonstrating the relatively clean nature of the graphene–dielectric interface (Fig. S3). A suppression of electron transport branch is observed in the Ids–VTG transfer curves. This electron-hole asymmetry commonly originates from the misalignment between the work function of contact electrodes and the neutrality point of the graphene channel (24). A trend of negative shift of Dirac point is observed with increasing drain voltage. This can be explained by the fact that the Dirac point will shift by 1/2ΔVds with a change of bias voltage ΔVds, caused by the relative potential between the gate and drain (25, 26).
In order to characterize the gate capacitance, the conductance of one graphene transistor with 300-nm channel length and 22-nm dielectric thickness is measured as a function of both top-gate voltage (VTG) and back-gate voltage (VBG) (Fig. 3D). The ratio between the top-gate and back-gate capacitance is extracted from the slope of the linear shift trajectory of the Dirac point as a function of both the top-gate and back-gate voltage, which gives a value for CTG/CBG of about 29. For 300-nm SiO2, the back-gate capacitance is CBG = 11.5 nF cm-2; therefore, the estimated top-gate capacitance is CTG = 334 nF cm-2 (27), which is consistent with the result obtained from geometry-based finite-element calculations (CTG = 359 nF cm-2) (Fig. S4).
Fig. 3E shows the Ids–VTG transfer curves of several devices with variable self-aligned gate length ranging from 3 μm to 100 nm. With decreasing channel length, a general trend of positive shift of Dirac point and decrease of on/off ratio is observed, which can be explained by short-channel effect (25): In short-channel device, the off-state energy barrier is strongly affected by drain voltage, and thus increases the off-state current and requires higher gate voltage to turn off the channel. Fig. 3F shows the extracted transconductance, gm = |dIds/dVTG|, for devices with different channel length. The peak transconductance at bias of 600 mV increases from 0.11 mS/μm (L = 3 μm) to 0.53 mS/μm (L = 300 nm). However, a further shrinkage of channel length to 100 nm leads to a reduction of transconductance to 0.45 mS/μm, which may be explained by the short-channel effect with less effective gate modulation when the channel length is becoming comparable with the gate dielectric thickness (25). Moreover, the occurrence of Klein tunneling in ultra–short-channel device makes the short-channel effect worse (28–31).
The above discussion clearly demonstrates that our self-aligned graphene transistors with transferred gate stacks exhibit excellent dc performance. To further determine the cutoff frequency (fT) of our devices, we carried out the on-chip microwave measurements with an Agilent 8361A network analyzer in the range of 50 MHz–30 GHz. The graphene transistors for rf measurement are fabricated on glass substrate in order to minimize the parasitic pad capacitance. To assess accurately the intrinsic fT value, careful de-embedding procedures are performed using the exact pad layout as “open,” “short,” and “through” structures on the same chip. The de-embedded S parameters constitute a complete set of coefficients to describe intrinsic input and output behavior of graphene transistors.
Fig. 4A shows the small-signal current gain |h21| extracted from the measured S parameters at VTG = 1.5 V and Vds = 0.6 V in a 220-nm channel-length graphene transistor. The curve shows a typical 1/f frequency dependence expected for an ideal field-effect transistor. The linear fit yields a fT value of 57 GHz for this particular device (Fig. 4A), which is also verified by using Gummel’s approach (Fig. 4A, Inset). To further probe the limit of the frequency response, we have fabricated graphene transistors with smaller channel lengths. Fig. 4B and C show the result extracted from another two self-aligned graphene transistors with 100-nm and 46-nm channel length. The cutoff frequency is fT = 110 GHz and fT = 212 GHz, respectively. After the rf measurement, we have carefully analyzed the S parameters for all three devices. The device component values (including gate-source capacitance, gate-drain capacitance, transconductance, source resistance, and drain resistance) derived from the rf measurements are consistent with those obtained from the dc measurements and finite element simulations (Table S1), demonstrating the validity of the rf measurements and the de-embedding procedures.
In addition to fT, maximum oscillation frequency (fMAX), defined as the frequency at which the power gain is equal to one, is another important parameter for rf characteristics. The power-gain performance plot shows a device with 220-nm channel length exhibits a high fMAX of 29 GHz, and a 46-nm device shows a value of 8 GHz (Fig. S5). Because fMAX highly depends on fT, gate resistance, and source drain conductance, it does not always scale with channel length. The fMAX value of the devices can be further improved by increasing graphene quality, reducing gate resistance, and increasing source drain current saturation.
To investigate further the reproducibility of our approach and examine the length-scaling relationship, we examined more than 40 graphene transistors of variable channel lengths (L) and dielectrics thicknesses. In general, the peak cutoff frequencies follow 1/L dependence, which is consistent with previous studies (16). Although 1/L2 dependence was observed in longer-channel devices (32), the dominance by contact resistance and degradation of transconductance in short-channel transistors leads to 1/L dependence of the cutoff frequency (16). For devices with dielectric thickness of 44 nm, the cutoff frequency falls beneath the 1/L trend when the channel length shrinks to 100 nm. This phenomenon can be attributed to the short-channel effect (25), in which the gate modulation is less effective when the channel length is reduced to be nearly comparable with gate dielectric thickness. This short-channel effect can be improved by using thinner dielectric thickness (e.g., 22 nm and 13 nm) (Fig. 4D).
The cutoff frequency of our self-aligned devices shows a significant improvement over previously reported CVD graphene transistors of comparable channel length (e.g., fT of approximately 212 GHz for a 46-nm device in our approach vs. 155 GHz for a 40-nm device reported previously). Nonetheless, the performance of these devices is still far from those obtained from peeled graphene (14, 16), which suggests that the ultimate performance of our devices here is limited by the quality of CVD graphene rather than the fabrication process. To demonstrate that our approach is applicable for higher-performance devices, we have studied the self-aligned transistors on peeled graphene. The devices are fabricated on highly resistive Si substrate with 300-nm SiO2 because of the difficulty in visualizing the peeled graphene on glass substrate. To assess accurately the intrinsic fT value, careful de-embedding procedures are performed using the identical pad layout as “open,” “short,” and “through,” structures on the same chip, following a previously established approach (14). Importantly, electrical characterization shows graphene transistors with substantially higher cutoff frequency can be obtained in this way. The Ids–VTG transfer of a 67-nm device shows that a maximum scaled on-current of 3.56 mA/μm and a peak scaled transconductance of 1.33 mS/μm is obtained at Vds = 1 V (Fig. 5A). Fig. 5B shows the small-signal current gain |h21| of a 67-nm channel-length graphene transistor with a typical 1/f frequency dependence and an extracted fT value of 427 GHz at Vds = 1.1 V (Fig. 5B, Inset). Additionally, an fT value of 169 GHz can be obtained at Vds = 0.4 V, indicating a linear trend of fT value with source drain voltage. The 427-GHz fT value represents the highest fT value reported for any graphene transistors to date. We believe the rf performance of our device can be further improved by minimizing the contact resistance or decreasing the gate dielectric thickness to improve gate coupling.
Conclusions
In summary, we have developed a scalable method to fabricate self-aligned graphene transistors on glass with transferred gate stacks. With a damage-free transfer process and self-aligned device structure, the fabricated graphene transistors exhibit the highest cutoff frequency to date (427 GHz). By processing conventional lithography, deposition, and etching steps on a sacrificial substrate before integrating with large-area CVD-grown graphene, this approach defines a pathway to scalable fabrication of high-speed self-aligned graphene transistor arrays on arbitrary substrate.
Methods
The detailed description of the device-fabrication process is described here and in SI Text. Both the dc and rf transport studies are conducted with a probe station at room temperature (25 °C) under ambient conditions. The on-chip microwave measurements are carried out in the 50-MHz–30-GHz range using an Agilent 8361A network analyzer. The scattering parameters measurements are de-embedded using specific “short” and “open” structures with identical layouts to exclude the effects of the parasitic capacitance, resistance, and inductance associated with the pads and connections. The “through” calibration was done with the exact pad layout (with the gate shorted to the drain), and the “load” calibration was done with the standard calibration pad.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.
We thank Yuwei Fan and Integrated Systems Nanofabrication Cleanroom at CNSI for the e-beam lithography pattern preparation; Minji Zhu, Minqiang Bao, and Center for High-Frequency Electronics for technique support of high-frequency measurement; and Nanoelectronics Research Facility at University of California, Los Angeles, for technical support of device fabrication. We acknowledge partial support of the work by National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Office of Naval Research.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1205696109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Novoselov KS, et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Novoselov KS, et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature. 2005;438:197–200. doi: 10.1038/nature04233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang YB, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature. 2005;438:201–204. doi: 10.1038/nature04235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Avouris P, Chen Z, Perebeinos V. Carbon-based electronics. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:605–615. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miao F, et al. Phase-coherent transport in graphene quantum billiards. Science. 2007;317:1530–1533. doi: 10.1126/science.1144359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater. 2007;6:183–191. doi: 10.1038/nmat1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys. 2009;81:109–162. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bai J, et al. Very large magnetoresistance in graphene nanoribbons. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:655–659. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park JU, Nam SW, Lee MS, Lieber CM. Synthesis of monolithic graphene-graphite integrated electronics. Nat Mater. 2012;11:120–125. doi: 10.1038/nmat3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwierz F. Graphene transistors. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:487–496. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jeon D-Y, et al. Radio-frequency electrical characteristics of single layer graphene. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2009;48:091601. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lin YM, et al. Operation of graphene transistors at gigahertz frequencies. Nano Lett. 2009;9:422–426. doi: 10.1021/nl803316h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moon JS, et al. Epitaxial-graphene RF field-effect transistors on Si-Face 6H-SiC substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2009;30:650–652. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liao L, et al. High-speed graphene transistors with a self-aligned nanowire gate. Nature. 2010;467:305–308. doi: 10.1038/nature09405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin YM, et al. 100-GHz transistors from wafer-scale epitaxial graphene. Science. 2010;327:662–662. doi: 10.1126/science.1184289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu Y, et al. High-frequency, scaled graphene transistors on diamond-like carbon. Nature. 2011;472:74–78. doi: 10.1038/nature09979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liao L, et al. Scalable fabrication of self-aligned graphene transistors and circuits on glass. Nano Lett. 2012;12:2653–2657. doi: 10.1021/nl201922c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee B, et al. Conformal Al2O3 dielectric layer deposited by atomic layer deposition for graphene-based nanoelectronics. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:203102. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang X, Tabakman SM, Dai H. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides on pristine and functionalized graphene. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:8152–8153. doi: 10.1021/ja8023059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xuan Y, et al. Atomic-layer-deposited nanostructures for graphene-based nanoelectronics. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;92:013101. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meitl MA, et al. Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp. Nat Mater. 2006;5:33–38. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li X, et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science. 2009;324:1312–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.1171245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bhaviripudi S, Jia X, Dresselhaus MS, Kong J. Role of kinetic factors in chemical vapor deposition synthesis of uniform large area graphene using copper catalyst. Nano Lett. 2010;10:4128–4133. doi: 10.1021/nl102355e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Farmer DB, et al. Chemical doping and electron-hole conduction asymmetry in graphene devices. Nano Lett. 2009;9:388–392. doi: 10.1021/nl803214a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bai J, et al. Top-gated chemical vapor deposition grown graphene transistors with current saturation. Nano Lett. 2011;11:2555–2559. doi: 10.1021/nl201331x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xu H, et al. Top-gated graphene field-effect transistors with high normalized transconductance and designable Dirac point voltage. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5031–5037. doi: 10.1021/nn201115p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liao L, et al. High-kappa oxide nanoribbons as gate dielectrics for high mobility top-gated graphene transistors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6711–6715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914117107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chauhan J, Guo J. Assessment of high-frequency performance limits of graphene field-effect transistors. Nano Res. 2011;4:571–579. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Katsnelson MI, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. Chiral tunneling and the Klein paradox in graphene. Nat Phys. 2006;2:620–625. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huard B, et al. Transport measurements across a tunable potential barrier in graphene. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:236803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.236803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Young AF, Kim P. Quantum interference and Klein tunneling in graphene heterojunctions. Nat Phys. 2009;5:222–226. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lin YM, et al. Development of graphene FETs for high frequency electronics; Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International; Baltimore, MD: IEEE Conference Publications; 2009. pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.