Abstract
We purified the Fo complex from the Ilyobacter tartaricus Na+-translocating F1Fo-ATP synthase and performed a biochemical and structural study. Laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption MS analysis demonstrates that all three subunits of the isolated Fo complex were present and in native stoichiometry (ab2c11). Cryoelectron microscopy of 2D crystals yielded a projection map at a resolution of 7.0 Å showing electron densities from the c11 rotor ring and up to seven adjacent helices. A bundle of four helices belongs to the stator a-subunit and is in contact with c11. A fifth helix adjacent to the four-helix bundle interacts very closely with a c-subunit helix, which slightly shifts its position toward the ring center. Atomic force microscopy confirms the presence of the Fo stator, and a height profile reveals that it protrudes less from the membrane than c11. The data limit the dimensions of the subunit a/c-ring interface: Three helices from the stator region are in contact with three c11 helices. The location and distances of the stator helices impose spatial restrictions on the bacterial Fo complex.
Keywords: bioenergetics, membrane protein complex, 2D crystallization, ion translocation mechanism, membrane Fo rotor-stator
F-type ATP synthases are the major supplier of chemically bound energy in the form of ATP in all living cells. These enzymes use a transmembrane electrochemical ion gradient as an energy source to convert ADP and Pi to ATP. Two structurally and functionally distinct domains together form a macromolecular protein complex: the water-soluble F1 complex (1), with a subunit stoichiometry of α3β3γδε, and the membrane-embedded Fo complex (2) (ab2c8–15). Both complexes can function as separate and independent rotary motors, fueled by either H+ or Na+ (Fo) or ATP (F1). Structurally, they are connected by a static peripheral (δb2) and a rotating central (γε) stalk. Ion translocation through the Fo complex induces torque, which leads to rotation (3, 4) of the enzyme’s rotor (γεcn). The central stalk γ-subunit rotates inside the F1 (αβ)3 headpiece and elicits sequential conformational changes in the three catalytic β-subunits, finally leading to ATP synthesis (5). In the reverse direction, along the same operation principle, the enzyme can act as an ATP hydrolysis-driven ion pump (6, 7).
The mechanism of ion translocation and torque generation in the Fo complex involves the stator subunits a and b2, as well as the rotor ring (cn, c-ring). In bacteria, the outer stalk consists of a pair of b-subunits, each forming a long, membrane-penetrating, and amphiphilic α-helix, which is in contact with the α-, β-, and δ-subunits at the F1 headpiece of the enzyme, and with the a-subunit and the c-ring in the membrane (8–10). Its coiled and stiff construction was proposed to make it act as a physical barrier against the Fo-generated torque (11, 12), but the b-subunit might also be involved in the ion translocation process itself (13, 14).
Several c-ring structures (and 1 K-ring from V-type ATPase) were solved by X-ray crystallography at high resolution and with unequivocal side-chain assignments (15–19). The synergistic picture that arises from the available c-ring structures poses functional restrictions but also suggests a conserved mechanism in rotary ATPases (20, 21). Thus, at least as regards the c-ring, an overall model for ion translocation has started to develop in the past few years.
The exact role of the stator a-subunit, however, remains unclear because structural information for this subunit is scarce. The Escherichia coli a-subunit is generally accepted to consist of five transmembrane α-helices (9, 22). It contains a conserved region at the predicted helix 4, including an arginine residue that has been shown to be essential for function (23–25). In addition to the models for the a-subunit derived from a large number of cross-linking and aqueous accessibility studies (9, 26–29), a subnanometer resolution structure of the V-type ATP synthase from the bacterium Thermus thermophilus has been reported recently (30). This cornerstone contribution suggests that the membrane stator complex of this rotary ATPase consists of eight transmembrane helices, forming two bundles of four helices each. Each bundle is in contact with different c-subunits and forms a half channel that provides ion access from either the periplasm (entrance pathway) or cytoplasm (exit pathway). These structural data appear fully in agreement with a previously proposed model of Fo function (3), as well as an Fo-mechanistic proposal based on high-resolution X-ray data of the c-ring (20). However, there are currently no structural data available for the rotor-stator interface (c-ring/a-subunit) in F-type ATP synthases. Clearly, structural data on the molecular architecture of the bacterial Fo stator are essential for a better understanding of the Fo operation mechanism.
We performed a study on the Fo complex from the bacterium Ilyobacter tartaricus. The isolated Fo complex was in native stoichiometry, and it was suitable as a target for biochemical and structural investigations. A projection map obtained from EM of 2D crystals at a resolution of 7.0 Å shows electron densities next to the c11 rings. They belong to the stator a-subunit, and perhaps the b-subunit, and are also visible on atomic force microscopy (AFM) topographic images. On the basis of these observations, we propose a model for the localization and arrangement of the bacterial Fo stator subunits at the c-ring and discuss an ion translocation model, including the data presently available in the literature.
Results
Purification of the I. tartaricus Fo Complex.
We developed a purification protocol of the I. tartaricus Fo complex [ITFo (ab2c11)] in amounts suitable for 2D crystallization experiments. An expression system was used that allows the production of His-tagged I. tartaricus F1Fo-ATP synthase (ITF1Fo) in E. coli DK8 cells. To purify ITFo, we stripped off the F1 complex using urea. Finally, a highly pure ITFo was obtained by metal chelate affinity chromatography (Fig. 1A). Using the same expression plasmid, we also purified ITF1Fo to compare it with the purified ITFo (Fig. 1A). The final ATPase activity was 8.8 U/mg, and both protein subunits a and b, as well as the c11 ring, showed an identical migration pattern. Silver stain signals on the SDS gel indicated that all Fo subunits were intact and apparently also kept in the expected stoichiometric amounts during the isolation procedure. The isolated ITFo was further analyzed by size exclusion chromatography, resulting in an ITFo-containing peak (e.g., in the presence of 0.5% Cymal-5) (Fig. S1). The a-subunit in isolated Fo showed a single signal on the Western blot, indicating that the a-subunit was intact and not degraded during purification (Fig. 1A). The final yield of pure Fo complex varied significantly from preparation to preparation and was in the range of 0.4–1.5 mg per 6-L × 2-L shaker culture setup.
Laser-Induced Liquid Bead Ion Desorption MS of the Purified ITFo.
Laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption (LILBID) MS allows one to analyze masses and stoichiometries of macromolecular membrane protein complexes in detergent solution at physiological buffer conditions. The method has a proven track record to be applicable on, for example, ATP synthases (31), as well as their c-rings (32). We therefore analyzed the assembly and stoichiometry of the isolated ITF1Fo and ITFo by LILBID-MS and compared the results with the ITF1Fo, which we isolated from WT I. tartaricus cells (Fig. 1B and Fig. S2). All theoretically calculated and measured masses from this experiment are summarized in Table S1. At soft laser intensity, the WT and heterologously expressed ITF1Fo both showed a mass of 548 ± 5 kDa for the complete F1Fo complex. At high laser intensity, all eight structural ATP synthase subunits were identified in the spectra; all measured masses corresponded with the expected masses for both ITF1Fo complexes. The purified ITFo analyzed at soft laser intensity shows, in addition to higher charged peaks (2− to 5−), the singly charged peak of the Fo complex at 168 ± 2 kDa, corresponding exactly to the calculated mass of the ab2c11 complex. At high laser intensity, the ITFo dissociated into protein subunits a-His12 (34 ± 0.3 kDa), c (8.8 ± 0.1 kDa), and b (18.6 ± 0.2 kDa), also in agreement with the literature values. Further, several oligomers were detected in the mass spectra (c2, c3, c4, and c1b1). Taken together, LILBID-MS showed that the measured masses of the complexes (WT ITF1Fo, recombinant ITF1Fo, and ITFo) correlate well with the calculated masses. Hence, the purified protein complexes show a native subunit composition and stoichiometry: α3β3γδεab2c11 for ITF1Fo and ab2c11 for ITFo.
EM Analysis of Reconstituted and 2D Crystalline ITFo.
The ITFo was subjected to several 2D crystallization attempts, in which the various parameters, such as the protein concentration, lipid type, lipid-to-protein ratio (LPR), pH, dialysis time and temperature, and salt conditions, were tested. The samples were screened by EM (SI Results and Figs. S1 and S3 provide more information about ITFo stability and lipid analysis, respectively). Vesicles with tightly packed proteins but no 2D crystals were found. Some samples containing densely reconstituted protein were tested by immunogold labeling, and the presence of the a-subunit was confirmed at pH 8.0 and 8.5 (Fig. 2 A and B), whereas in control experiments with empty vesicles or reconstituted c11 rings only, no gold particles were found (Fig. 2 C and D).
Separation of the rotor and stator components in the Fo part during crystallization procedures of ATP synthase is a known feature of the enzyme (e.g., it also occurred in 3D crystallization trials of the yeast mitochondrial ATP synthase, yielding F1c10 subcomplexes) (33). Similarly, the inherent tendency of I. tartaricus c11 rings to form 2D crystals hampered us in the crystallization of the entire ITFo; in some cases, 2D crystals of c11 rings in the previously described space group p1 (34–36) appeared. However, under some conditions, 2D crystals in plane group p121 were formed. This crystal form was observed when reconstituting ITFo in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC)/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (POPG)/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE) mixture at an LPR of 0.94–1.25 (protein concentrations from 0.95-1.5 mg/ml) at 20–25 °C and with a pH of 8.0 and 150–250 mM KCl. These crystalline areas, however, were scarce and were parts of small sheets with a size of ∼0.3–0.6 μm (Fig. 2E).
From cryoelectron micrographs of crystals embedded in trehalose, structure factors up to 5 Å were obtained after correction for lattice distortions (Fig. S4). The five best lattices were merged to 7.0 Å (Fig. S5) to calculate a projection electron density map (Fig. 2F). The rectangular unit cell has the cell dimensions a = 252 Å and b = 81 Å. One unit cell contains two asymmetrical units with three c11 rings in each. The c11 rings are present in an alternating “up” and “down” orientation, as also observed in the crystals of plane group p1. In both plane groups, each ring establishes crystal contacts with neighboring rings oriented in opposite cytoplasmic/periplasmic directions. Strikingly, however, the p121 crystal maps showed, in addition to the c-ring densities, unique prominent densities that were not present in any of the previously obtained I. tartaricus c11 projection maps (34–36). They were located in the proximity of the c-rings at three different positions in the asymmetrical unit. These three densities build irregular structures in proximity to two, three, or four rings (Figs. S6 and S7). The unique features are partly resolved into strong density peaks that may represent transmembrane helices, perpendicular to the membrane. Up to seven helices may be present in total, but their appearance is ambiguous in some cases.
AFM.
Two-dimensional crystalline ITFo samples were investigated by high-resolution AFM (Fig. 3). Two different packings were observed. The p1 crystals, as seen also in c-ring crystals (34), were the most abundant (Fig. 3A). The c11 rings showed two orientations, either visible from the periplasmic side and filled with phospholipids (37) or visible from the cytoplasmic side with no central mass inside (Fig. 3 A, D, and E). In some of the topographs, the crystalline areas showed a different packing, in which one ring was in contact with four neighboring rings oppositely oriented in the membrane. Despite an intensive search, 2D crystals of the p121 packing type were not found.
In regions of densely packed protein, close to the 2D crystal borders, c11 rings with and without a central plug were visible. The latter were better resolved (Fig. 3 A and C), and a height profile analysis performed on cross-sections of selected regions in the topographs (Fig. S8) revealed that they protruded 0.7 ± 0.1 nm (n = 20) from the membrane surface level. Interestingly, between two neighboring c-rings, additional objects sometimes could be seen (Fig. 3B, white arrows). They protruded only 0.4 ± 0.1 nm (n = 23) from the membrane. Each protrusion most likely represents an attached a-subunit with an average width and length of 1.5 ± 0.3 nm (n = 21). Based on the height difference in the unprocessed AFM topographs, these objects could be distinguished from c1 (38) or cn oligomers occasionally attached at the outside of the c-rings (Fig. 3B, red arrows). The presence or absence of the b-subunit could not be determined with certainty. However, in addition to the described densities, highly flexible parts protruding higher than the c-rings and presumably belonging to the b-subunit were present in the samples, but these caused artifacts during imaging.
Noncrystallographic Symmetry Averaging of the ITFo.
To investigate whether there are conserved elements in the three extra densities of the asymmetrical unit of the p121 crystals, noncrystallographic symmetry (NCS) averaging based on single-particle averaging was performed. The three c11 rings in the asymmetrical unit with the same up/down orientation and the extra densities next to them were averaged using translational and rotational alignment in IMAGIC (39). Because it was not clear which extra density belongs to which ring, all six possibilities were taken into consideration (Fig. S6). A single ring with all surrounding densities was contoured, excluding the neighboring rings (Fig. S7 A–C), and then aligned and averaged with the two others (Fig. S7 D–I). In all six possible arrangements, the c-ring densities were enhanced by the alignment, but only in one were the extra densities significantly increased relative to the background (Fig. S7D). The selected regions are shown in Fig. 4 A–C. Each of the extra densities contains a four-helix bundle (red in Fig. 4). In the average (Fig. 4D) of the selected three regions, the four-helix bundle can also be seen, although one helix is very weak because of a slight difference in its position within the three regions. Two of these four helices interact with one or two outer α-helices from the c11 ring. The distances measured between the highest density peaks of the extra densities and the c11 peaks are shown in Fig. 4E (lines a–g). Apart from the four-helix bundle, only 11.4 ± 0 Å apart, a fifth prominent helix (brown in Fig. 4) interacts with two adjacent outer c11 ring helices (nos. 1 and 11 in Fig. 4E) at a very close distance, 10.6 ± 1.8 Å and 9.5 ± 1.7 Å, respectively. The packing in this region (g) is so tight that the density center of helix no. 11 seems to shift toward the c-ring center by a few angstroms (Fig. 4E, red line). It is not clear whether this shift is induced by the various ITFo crystal contacts or represents a native conformation of the protein complex. Further, up to two more helices are present at each position in the asymmetrical unit. Two prominent helices are visible in Fig. 4 B and C next to the bundle (blue in Fig. 4), in a position that is occupied by a neighboring c-ring in Fig. 4A. It is thus possible that the densities in Fig. 4A are in a different conformation than the other two because of crystal contacts. In pairwise averaging (Fig. S7 J–L), it can be seen that the extra densities in Fig. 4 B and C are most similar to each other. The interaction of the c-ring and the neighboring density covers a length of ∼21 Å and involves three α-helices of the c-ring and up to three α-helices of the stator.
Discussion
This work provides structural data of the stator components of the Fo complex from a bacterial F-type Na+-ATP synthase at a resolution of 7.0 Å. The map shows electron densities that can be unequivocally attributed to the 22 α-helices of the I. tartaricus c11 ring. In addition, up to seven electron density peaks are visible next to the c-rings. These must represent the transmembrane domains of the Fo stator components, namely, the a-subunit and perhaps also the b-subunit. The presence of the b-subunit could not be explicitly confirmed. These densities were weaker than the helix densities of the c-rings, which may mean that the helices of the stator are shorter or more highly tilted than the c-ring helices, or that the stator components are present at a lower occupancy in the crystal. AFM studies showed that these features protrude less from the membrane than the c-rings. LILBID-MS analysis, gel filtration, and electrophoresis experiments show that all Fo subunits were present and in native stoichiometry (ab2c11) before the 2D crystallization setups were made. It is, however, possible that some of the stator components dissociate during the crystallization process and that they are present only in the noncrystalline parts of the vesicles.
Electron Density Map Interpretation.
A remarkable feature of the map is the presence of a four-helix bundle (red in Fig. 4). The distances between pairs of helices in this bundle are almost equal (10.1 ± 1.5 Å), and two of those helices contact the c-ring. Concurrent with our data, a four-helix bundle has been proposed for the E. coli a-subunit (40). Two four-helix bundles are also visible in the membrane-embedded stator region of the T. thermophilus ATP synthase, as recently visualized by cryo-EM (30). Our data hence suggest that such bundles are conserved elements of the stator a-subunits, and thus important for Fo stator function. At the side of the bundle, a fifth helix is in close contact with the c-ring (brown in Fig. 4). The map indicates that this rotor-stator helix arrangement is packed so tightly that the usual symmetry of the c-ring apparently is disturbed at this position and one of the outer helices (no. 11 in Fig. 4) shifts slightly inward. This remarkable observation might have consequences for the Fo mechanism because it could indicate functionally important conformational changes that can occur during the ion exchange process. However, this helix is involved in crystal contacts; any mechanistic interpretation needs further careful structural investigation.
In addition to these five helices, there are up to two more density peaks present, but their position differs depending on the reference ring. In two cases (blue in Fig. 4 B and C), there are two peaks between the four-helix bundle and a c-ring in close proximity to the fifth helix. In one case (Fig. 4A), a neighboring c-ring occupies this position, but two helices are visible at the side of the four-helix bundle facing away from the c-ring and the fifth helix. Apparently, the c-rings are more rigid than the densities next to them, and the stator subunits might be only weakly bound to the c-ring. Therefore, some of the stator helices perhaps adopt a conformation that simply fits best in the crystal lattice. The inherent flexibility of the rotor-stator region remains a pertinent problem for structural investigations. A covalent linking of the rotor with the stator (25) seems a valid approach for future studies with a stabilized Fo complex.
The interpretation of the map shows that the rotor-stator interface harbors three stator transmembrane helices, which are in contact with three outer (C-terminal) c11 ring helices over a length of ∼21 Å. Although our data suggest that the visible helices are rather straight, a limitation of the projection map is that their 3D path cannot be seen. In the V-type ATP synthase, there are indications (30) that some a-subunit helices approach the ion binding site in the middle of the membrane, at the narrowest part of the hour glass-shaped c11 ring (15, 35).
Helix Assignment.
A secondary structure and topography analysis of the I. tartaricus a-subunit suggests six α-helices (SI Results and Fig. S9), but a complicating factor for the helix assignment in our map was the presence or absence of the b-subunit(s) after 2D crystallization. Cross-link experiments performed with the ITF1Fo based on the E. coli and I. tartaricus enzymes (26, 27) show that helix a4, harboring the functionally important a-subunit arginine (25), and helix a5 (41) are in contact with outer c-ring helices (c2). Biochemical studies proposed that the helices a2–a5 in E. coli form a four-helix bundle (40). There is also evidence that both b-subunit helices can interact with the same c-monomer (10) and two a-subunit loop regions (a1–a2 and a2–a3) can be cross-linked to the b-subunit (9), suggesting the close proximity of helix a2 to the N-terminal part of the b-subunit. The four-helix bundle (red in Fig. 4) could therefore represent helices a2–a5. The assignment of the fifth density (brown in Fig. 4) as well as the two remaining densities (dashed blue lines in Fig. 4F), which are missing in one of the three densities (Fig. 4A), is less clear. They all could represent one or two b-subunits as well as one or both a-subunit helices (a0, a1). It is also possible that as a result of crystal contacts, some of the density in Fig. 4A results from a different conformation than the density observed in Fig. 4 B and C.
Ion Translocation.
An ion translocation model through the Fo complex involves two ion pathways, which both end at the ion binding site of the c-ring in the middle of the membrane (3). The two pathways have been proposed to be physically separated by the conserved arginine in the a-subunit with a dual role: (i) acting as an electrostatic separator between the two access/release pathways (25) and (ii) catalyzing reversible ion exchange at the rotor’s (c-ring) ion binding site (15, 20). A bundle of four or sometimes three helices was observed in ion (H+ and Na+) conducting membrane proteins as sufficient to provide a functional ion conducting pathway (42, 43). Our data show that the bacterial Fo stator component has one four-helix bundle and, in addition, up to three more helices that belong to the a-subunit or perhaps to the b-subunit. They clearly do not form a second helix bundle, but they can still be involved in ion translocation. Apparently, despite a conserved ion translocation mechanism in different rotary ATPase types (20, 21), the rotor-stator interface architecture varies and involves two four-helix bundles in a V-type ATPase (30) instead of one, as seen here.
A total number of eight (I. tartaricus) or seven (E. coli and most other bacteria) (Fig. S9) helices are, in principle, compatible with the requirement of three to four helices per ion pathway. Although our data do not yet allow interpretations about the locations of these access and exit ion pathways, they appear to be compatible with the contemporary model of ion translocation (20). A feature of this model is, for example, that the Fo stator region provides a hydrated region in which the ion binding glutamate of the c-ring can change its conformation from locked to open, enabling ion exchange. The rotor-stator interface we found is large enough to provide such an environment; our work imposes previously undescribed spatial restrictions on the Fo complex in bacterial ATP synthases.
Materials and Methods
Expression and Purification of ITF1Fo and the Fo Subcomplex.
ITF1Fo and ITFo were expressed and purified as described in detail in SI Materials and Methods. Briefly, for ITFo purification, the membranes were washed with 3.5 M urea before solubilization to separate F1 from Fo; subsequently, ITFo was purified via affinity chromatography.
Two-Dimensional Crystallization of ITFo.
Lipids were dissolved in 1% decyl-β-d-maltoside at 4 mg/mL. ITFo purified in dodecyl-β-d-maltoside was mixed with POPC, POPE, and POPG (1:1:1 mixture) at a protein concentration of 0.95–1.5 mg/mL and at LPRs of 1–1.25 (wt/wt) and incubated at 4 °C overnight. The samples were dialyzed in dialysis buttons (Hampton Research) against 50 mM Tris⋅HCl at pH 8.0, 150–250 mM KCl, 3 mM NaN3, and 1 mM DTT. The crystals in plane group p121 formed at 20 °C to 25 °C after 8 wk of dialysis.
EM, AFM, and LILBID-MS.
Negatively stained samples [1.5% (wt/vol), uranyl acetate] were screened using a Philips CM120 microscope at a magnification of 45,000×. Samples containing crystals were frozen by the back-injection method in 4.5% (wt/vol) trehalose on carbon-coated copper grids, and data collection was as described by Matthies et al. (44). Images were processed using the software 2dx (45) to correct lattice distortions and the contrast transfer function (46). Five lattices were merged using the CCP4 suite (47) to a resolution of 7.0 Å to generate a projection map. An isotropic temperature factor (B = −200 Å2) was applied to compensate for the resolution-dependent degradation of image amplitudes. Immunogold on grid labeling, AFM of reconstituted ITFo, and LILBID-MS were performed as described in SI Materials and Methods.
NCS Averaging.
Real-space NCS averaging of the c11 rings and extra densities was performed using IMAGIC (39). An image was created of each of the three rings in the asymmetrical unit in the same in-plane orientation with its surrounding densities. The other rings were masked out manually. Six possible arrangements of rings with associated extra density were identified. The rings were prealigned to superimpose the extra densities for each possible arrangement. Then, the 11 subunits of the rings were accurately aligned translationally and rotationally. The aligned images were averaged, and the averages were examined for enhanced densities outside the rings. This was the case for only one of the six possibilities.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Anke Terwisscha van Scheltinga for help with the initial NCS averaging. Plasmid pItTr5His was a kind gift from Peter Dimroth’s laboratory (cloned: Benjamin Oberfeld, His-tag: Christoph von Ballmoos). J.K.H. thanks Deryck Mills for the help with microscopy. We thank Friederike Joos for the help with the immunogold labeling. T.M. thanks John Rubinstein for providing his manuscript and structure data prior to publication of the study by Lau and Rubenstein (30). Werner Kühlbrandt is also thanked for his generous support of T.M.’s research. We also thank Daniel J. Müller for help in AFM and reading the manuscript, Petra Schwille (Biotechnology Center, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany) for providing laboratory space and support at Dresden University of Technology to perform the AFM experiments, and José Faraldo-Gómez for useful comments on the manuscript. T.M. was financially supported (position for J.K.H. and materials) by the Collaborative Research Center 807 of the German Research Foundation. Further financial support (materials) for this project was provided to T.M. and B.B. by the Cluster of Excellence “Macromolecular Complexes” at the Goethe University Frankfurt (Project EXC 115) and the EuroSYNBIO-Nanocell project of the European Science Foundation.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
See Author Summary on page 11908 (volume 109, number 30).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1203971109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Abrahams JP, Leslie AGW, Lutter R, Walker JE. Structure at 2.8 Å resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature. 1994;370:621–628. doi: 10.1038/370621a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Foster DL, Fillingame RH. Stoichiometry of subunits in the H+-ATPase complex of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:2009–2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Junge W, Sielaff H, Engelbrecht S. Torque generation and elastic power transmission in the rotary FOF1-ATPase. Nature. 2009;459:364–370. doi: 10.1038/nature08145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K., Jr Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature. 1997;386:299–302. doi: 10.1038/386299a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyer PD. The ATP synthase—A splendid molecular machine. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:717–749. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoshida M, Muneyuki E, Hisabori T. ATP synthase—A marvellous rotary engine of the cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:669–677. doi: 10.1038/35089509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dimroth P, von Ballmoos C, Meier T. Catalytic and mechanical cycles in F-ATP synthases. Fourth in the Cycles Review Series. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:276–282. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McLachlin DT, Coveny AM, Clark SM, Dunn SD. Site-directed cross-linking of b to the alpha, beta, and a subunits of the Escherichia coli ATP synthase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17571–17577. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000375200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vik SB, Ishmukhametov RR. Structure and function of subunit a of the ATP synthase of Escherichia coli. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2005;37:445–449. doi: 10.1007/s10863-005-9488-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jones PC, Hermolin J, Jiang W, Fillingame RH. Insights into the rotary catalytic mechanism of F0F1 ATP synthase from the cross-linking of subunits b and c in the Escherichia coli enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31340–31346. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003687200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Del Rizzo PA, Bi Y, Dunn SD, Shilton BH. The “second stalk” of Escherichia coli ATP synthase: Structure of the isolated dimerization domain. Biochemistry. 2002;41:6875–6884. doi: 10.1021/bi025736i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wächter A, et al. Two rotary motors in F-ATP synthase are elastically coupled by a flexible rotor and a stiff stator stalk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3924–3929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011581108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schneider E, Altendorf K. All three subunits are required for the reconstitution of an active proton channel (F0) of Escherichia coli ATP synthase (F1F0) EMBO J. 1985;4:515–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03658.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wehrle F, Kaim G, Dimroth P. Molecular mechanism of the ATP synthase’s Fo motor probed by mutational analyses of subunit a. J Mol Biol. 2002;322:369–381. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00731-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meier T, Polzer P, Diederichs K, Welte W, Dimroth P. Structure of the rotor ring of F-type Na+-ATPase from Ilyobacter tartaricus. Science. 2005;308:659–662. doi: 10.1126/science.1111199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pogoryelov D, Yildiz Ö, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Meier T. High-resolution structure of the rotor ring of a proton-dependent ATP synthase. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:1068–1073. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Preiss L, Yildiz Ö, Hicks DB, Krulwich TA, Meier T. A new type of proton coordination in an F1Fo-ATP synthase rotor ring. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e000443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murata T, Yamato I, Kakinuma Y, Leslie AG, Walker JE. Structure of the rotor of the V-Type Na+-ATPase from Enterococcus hirae. Science. 2005;308:654–659. doi: 10.1126/science.1110064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Symersky J, et al. Structure of the c10 ring of the yeast mitochondrial ATP synthase in the open conformation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:485–491. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pogoryelov D, et al. Microscopic rotary mechanism of ion translocation in the Fo complex of ATP synthases. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:891–899. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mizutani K, et al. Structure of the rotor ring modified with N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide of the Na+-transporting vacuolar ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13474–13479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103287108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Valiyaveetil FI, Fillingame RH. Transmembrane topography of subunit a in the Escherichia coli F1F0 ATP synthase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16241–16247. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cain BD. Mutagenic analysis of the F0 stator subunits. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2000;32:365–371. doi: 10.1023/a:1005575919638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lightowlers RN, Howitt SM, Hatch L, Gibson F, Cox GB. The proton pore in the Escherichia coli F0F1-ATPase: A requirement for arginine at position 210 of the a-subunit. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;894:399–406. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mitome N, et al. Essential arginine residue of the Fo-a subunit in Fo-ATP synthase has a role to prevent the proton shortcut without c-ring rotation in the Fo proton channel. Biochem J. 2010;430:171–177. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jiang W, Fillingame RH. Interacting helical faces of subunits a and c in the F1Fo ATP synthase of Escherichia coli defined by disulfide cross-linking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6607–6612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vorburger T, et al. Arginine-induced conformational change in the c-ring/a-subunit interface of ATP synthase. FEBS J. 2008;275:2137–2150. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Steed PR, Fillingame RH. Aqueous accessibility to the transmembrane regions of subunit c of the Escherichia coli F1F0 ATP synthase. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:23243–23250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.002501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Angevine CM, Herold KA, Vincent OD, Fillingame RH. Aqueous access pathways in ATP synthase subunit a. Reactivity of cysteine substituted into transmembrane helices 1, 3, and 5. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9001–9007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610848200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lau WC, Rubinstein JL. Subnanometre-resolution structure of the intact Thermus thermophilus H+-driven ATP synthase. Nature. 2012;481:214–218. doi: 10.1038/nature10699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoffmann J, et al. ATP synthases: Cellular nanomotors characterized by LILBID mass spectrometry. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:13375–13382. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00733a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meier T, et al. A tridecameric c ring of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthase from the thermoalkaliphilic Bacillus sp. strain TA2.A1 facilitates ATP synthesis at low electrochemical proton potential. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:1181–1192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stock D, Leslie AGW, Walker JE. Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science. 1999;286:1700–1705. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stahlberg H, et al. Bacterial Na+-ATP synthase has an undecameric rotor. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:229–233. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vonck J, et al. Molecular architecture of the undecameric rotor of a bacterial Na+-ATP synthase. J Mol Biol. 2002;321:307–316. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00597-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meier T, et al. Evidence for structural integrity in the undecameric c-rings isolated from sodium ATP synthases. J Mol Biol. 2003;325:389–397. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Meier T, Matthey U, Henzen F, Dimroth P, Müller DJ. The central plug in the reconstituted undecameric c cylinder of a bacterial ATP synthase consists of phospholipids. FEBS Lett. 2001;505:353–356. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02837-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meier T, et al. Structural evidence for a constant c11 ring stoichiometry in the sodium F-ATP synthase. FEBS J. 2005;272:5474–5483. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.van Heel M, Harauz G, Orlova EV, Schmidt R, Schatz M. A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:17–24. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schwem BE, Fillingame RH. Cross-linking between helices within subunit a of Escherichia coli ATP synthase defines the transmembrane packing of a four-helix bundle. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:37861–37867. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607453200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Moore KJ, Fillingame RH. Structural interactions between transmembrane helices 4 and 5 of subunit a and the subunit c ring of Escherichia coli ATP synthase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31726–31735. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803848200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stouffer AL, et al. Structural basis for the function and inhibition of an influenza virus proton channel. Nature. 2008;451:596–599. doi: 10.1038/nature06528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gonzales EB, Kawate T, Gouaux E. Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature. 2009;460:599–604. doi: 10.1038/nature08218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Matthies D, et al. The c13 ring from a thermoalkaliphilic ATP synthase reveals an extended diameter due to a special structural region. J Mol Biol. 2009;388:611–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gipson B, Zeng X, Zhang ZY, Stahlberg H. 2dx–user-friendly image processing for 2D crystals. J Struct Biol. 2007;157:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Downing KH, Lepault J, Zemlin F. Structure of purple membrane from Halobacterium halobium: Recording, measurement and evaluation of electron micrographs at 3.5 Å resolution. Ultramicroscopy. 1986;19:147–178. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Collaborative Computational Project, N The CCP4 Suite: Programs for Protein Crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994;50:760–763. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994003112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]