Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2012 May;166(2):764–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01813.x

PKC-dependent activation of human K2P18.1 K+ channels

Ann-Kathrin Rahm 1, Jakob Gierten 1, Jana Kisselbach 1, Ingo Staudacher 1, Kathrin Staudacher 1, Patrick A Schweizer 1, Rüdiger Becker 1, Hugo A Katus 1, Dierk Thomas 1
PMCID: PMC3417503  PMID: 22168364

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Two-pore-domain K+ channels (K2P) mediate K+ background currents that modulate the membrane potential of excitable cells. K2P18.1 (TWIK-related spinal cord K+ channel) provides hyperpolarizing background currents in neurons. Recently, a dominant-negative loss-of-function mutation in K2P18.1 has been implicated in migraine, and activation of K2P18.1 channels was proposed as a therapeutic strategy. Here we elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying PKC-dependent activation of K2P18.1 currents.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Human K2P18.1 channels were heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and currents were recorded with the two-electrode voltage clamp technique.

KEY RESULTS

Stimulation of PKC using phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) activated the hK2P18.1 current by 3.1-fold in a concentration-dependent fashion. The inactive analogue 4α-PMA had no effect on channel activity. The specific PKC inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide I, Ro-32-0432 and chelerythrine reduced PMA-induced channel activation indicating that PKC is involved in this effect of PMA. Selective activation of conventional PKC isoforms with thymeleatoxin (100 nM) did not reproduce K2P18.1 channel activation. Current activation by PMA was not affected by pretreatment with CsA (calcineurin inhibitor) or KT 5720 (PKA inhibitor), ruling out a significant contribution of calcineurin or cross-talk with PKA to the PKC-dependent hK2P18.1 activation. Finally, mutation of putative PKC phosphorylation sites did not prevent PMA-induced K2P18.1 channel activation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We demonstrated that activation of hK2P18.1 (TRESK) by PMA is mediated by PKC stimulation. Hence, PKC-mediated activation of K2P18.1 background currents may serve as a novel molecular target for migraine treatment.

Keywords: background potassium current, cellular excitability, K2P channel, leak current, membrane potential, migraine

Introduction

Two-pore-domain K+ channels (K2P) mediate potassium background (or ‘leak’) currents. They exert control over cellular excitability by stabilizing the resting membrane potential (RMP) and by influencing duration and frequency of action potentials in excitable cells (Goldstein et al., 2001; Thomas et al., 2008; Thomas and Goldstein, 2009; Enyedi and Czirjak, 2010; Gierten et al., 2010; 2012; Seyler et al., 2011; Staudacher et al., 2011a,b). K2Pα-subunits are identified by their unique structure of two pore-forming domains (P) and four transmembrane segments (TM). Two α-subunits assemble to form a functional potassium channel. The human (h) K2P18.1 channel (TRESK, TWIK-related spinal cord K+ channel) is expressed in spinal cord and brain and is regulated by protons, polyunsaturated fatty acids and anaesthetics (Sano et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2004). IK2P18.1 contributes to the K+ background current in dorsal root ganglion neurons and has been implicated in pain and anaesthesia (Liu et al., 2004; Keshavaprasad et al., 2005; Kang and Kim, 2006; Dobler et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2007; Chae et al., 2010; Tulleuda et al., 2011). In addition, K2P18.1 is involved in paraesthesia associated with hydroxy-α-sanshool found in Sichuan peppers, in nociception and in calcineurin-inhibitor induced pain syndrome (Bautista et al., 2008; Smith, 2009). Furthermore, a dominant-negative loss-of-function mutation in the kcnk18 gene (encoding for K2P18.1) causes migraine with aura (Lafreniere et al., 2010). Despite its potential significance as a pharmacological target in migraine, migraine-related disorders and other pain syndromes, information on the regulation of K2P18.1 is limited. Activation of K2P18.1 channels by a calcium-dependent pathway via calcineurin binding to a nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-like binding site in the intracellular loop of the channel protein has been described previously (Czirjak et al., 2004; Czirjak and Enyedi, 2006; 2010). In addition, channel activation through PKA-mediated binding of 14-3-3-proteins has been demonstrated (Czirjak et al., 2008). Regulation of hK2P18.1 by PKC, a key modulator of ion channel activity in response to extracellular signalling, has not been studied to date. In the present study, we investigated the PKC-dependent activation of hK2P18.1 currents in Xenopus oocytes. Our results suggest that activation of K2P18.1 channels can silence neuronal firing by hyperpolarization of the RMP and this might represent a novel therapeutic target for migraine treatment.

Methods

Molecular biology

The hK2P18.1 clone was kindly provided by Dr C. Spencer Yost (San Francisco, CA, USA). Drug target nomenclature conforms with British Journal of Pharmacology's Guide to Receptors and Channels (Alexander et al., 2011). After vector linearization with PmeI, cDNA was transcribed using T7 DNA polymerase and the mMessage mMachine Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). RNA transcripts were quantified by spectrophotometry after separation by agarose gel electrophoresis. Putative consensus PKC phosphorylation sites were identified using Scansite, NetPhos, KinasePhos, and Human Protein Reference Database software, and targeted by alanine scanning. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene Products Division, Agilent Technologies, La Jolla, CA, USA) and synthetic oligonucleotide primers (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) (Table 1). Mutants were confirmed by DNA sequencing (GATC, Karlsruhe, Germany). Mutated cDNA plasmids were subcloned into pcDNA3.1-TOPO (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) using HindIII and SacII (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

Table 1.

Forward (F) and reverse (R) oligonucleotide primers used for site-directed mutagenesis of putative PKC phosphorylation sites in hK2P18.1

Mutation Primer sequences
S162A F: 5′-CAACCATCTTATCTACAGCTTATAATCGGTTCCG-3′
R: 5′-CGGAACCGATTATAAGCTGTAGATAAGATGGTTG-3′
S178A F: 5′-CTTTACCCGCCCCCTCCTCGCCAAGTGGTGCCCCAAATC-3′
R: 5′-GATTTGGGGCACCACTTGGCGAGGAGGGGGCGGGTAAAG-3′
S184A F: 5′-CTCCAAGTGGTGCCCCAAAGCTCTCTTCAAGAAAAAAC-3′
R: 5′-GTTTTTTCTTGAAGAGAGCTTTGGGGCACCACTTGGAG-3′
S205A F: 5′-GTCCCTCAGATCATCATCGCTGCTGAAGAGCTTCCAG-3′
R: 5′-CTGGAAGCTCTTCAGCAGCGATGATGATCTGAGGGAC-3′
S224A F: 5′-CTTCACGCCCAAGCTGCGCCATGGAGCTGTTTGAG-3′
R: 5′-CTCAAACAGCTCCATGGCGCAGCTTGGGCGTGAAG-3′
T161A F: 5′-CCTGGCAACCATCTTATCTGCATCTTATAATCGGTTCCG-3′
R: 5′-CGGAACCGATTATAAGATGCAGATAAGATGGTTGCCAGG-3′
T216A F: 5′-GCCCCAAACTTGGCGCATGTCCTTCACG-3′
R: 5′-CGTGAAGGACATGCGCCAAGTTTGGGGC-3′
T239A F: 5′-CGCTAGAGAAACAGAACGCACTGCAACTGCCCCCAC-3′
R: 5′-GTGGGGGCAGTTGCAGTGCGTTCTGTTTCTCTAGCG-3′

Electrophysiology

Two-electrode voltage clamp measurements were performed as described previously (Kiehn et al., 1999). All animal care and experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and with the German Law on the Protection of Animals. Surgical procedures on female Xenopus laevis frogs were performed as previously described (Gierten et al., 2008). Briefly, stage V and VI defolliculated Xenopus oocytes were injected with 10–30 ng cRNA encoding study channels and measured 2–4 days after injection. Currents were recorded using an Oocyte Clamp amplifier (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, USA) and pCLAMP software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Data were sampled at 2 kHz and filtered at 1 kHz. Leak currents were not subtracted. Current amplitudes were determined at the end of +20 mV pulses.

Solutions and drug administration

Voltage clamp electrodes filled with 3 mM KCl solution had tip resistances of 3–5 MΩ. Experiments were performed at room temperature (20–22°C) and under constant perfusion by a gravity-driven perfusion system. The standard extracellular solution contained 96 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM HEPES. The pH was titrated to 7.4 with NaOH. The following chemicals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to stock solutions of 10 mM and stored at −20°C: phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA), 4α-PMA, KT 5720, Ro-32-0432, bisindolylmaleimide I (Bis I), chelerythrine, 2-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) and thymeleatoxin (TMX) (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Cyclosporine A (CsA; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO (10 mM) and stored at 4°C. On the day of experiments, aliquots of respective stock solutions were diluted to the desired concentration with bath solution.

Data analysis and statistics

Concentration–response relationships for drug-induced current activation were fitted to a logistic dose–response function [y = (A1− A2)/(1 + (x/x0)) + A2; x0, EC50 value]. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. We used Student's paired and unpaired t-tests to compare statistical significance of the results, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analysed using Origin (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) and Microsoft Excel software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Human K2P18.1 background currents are activated by PMA

Whole-cell hK2P18.1 currents were recorded using a voltage protocol consisting of 20 mV steps from −140 to +60 mV (460 ms duration; Figure 1A). The holding potential was −80 mV. This protocol was applied in all experiments, unless indicated otherwise. First, we examined the effect of the phorbol ester PMA, a non-specific PKC activator that stimulates conventional PKC (cPKC) and novel PKC (nPKC) isoenzymes (Nishizuka, 1984; Ron and Kazanietz, 1999). Treatment of cells with PMA (100 nM; 30 min) induced 3.1 ± 0.2-fold hK2P18.1 current activation (n= 7; Figure 1A and B). Current activation displayed a biphasic time course (Figure 1C). Currents reached a steady state after 30 min and decreased gradually under constant PMA application indicative of a metabolic process. The corresponding time control experiments (30 min) revealed moderate current run-up that was not statistically significant (+27.5 ± 13%; n= 7; P= 0.45). Activation of hK2P18.1 channels after PKC stimulation led to hyperpolarization of Xenopus oocytes by 7.1 ± 2.8 mV (n= 7; P= 0.02), as expected for background K+ channel stimulation (Figure 1D and E). The EC50 for PMA-dependent hK2P18.1 activation was 17.9 ± 9.0 nM (Figure 1F). K2P18.1 current–voltage relationships or activation thresholds were not altered by PMA stimulation (Figure 1G and H).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Activation of human K2P18.1 channels by PMA in Xenopus oocytes. (A) hK2P18.1 currents activated instantaneously and displayed virtually no inactivation under control conditions. (B) Stimulation of hK2P18.1 background currents by PMA application (100 nM, 30 min). (C) biphasic time course of current response to PMA stimulation. PMA (100 nM) induced maximum stimulation after 30 min, followed by current decrease (n= 7). (D, E) The increase in hK2P18.1 background currents correlates with significant RMP hyperpolarization (n= 7; *P < 0.05). (F) Concentration–response relationship for hK2P18.1 channel activation by PMA (EC50= 7.9 nM; n= 4–7 cells). (G, H) Activation curves, that is, step current amplitudes as a function of test potentials, recorded under isochronal conditions (G, original current amplitudes; H, values normalized to maximum currents). Current–voltage relationships were not affected by PMA (n= 7).

To assess the effects of PMA on hK2P18.1 rectification, linear ramp voltage protocols were applied between −140 and +60 mV (500 ms) before and after application of 100 nM PMA for 30 min (Figure 2A). Outward rectification was observed before and after drug application (n= 5). To exclude any non-specific interaction of PMA molecules with hK2P18.1 channels as a hypothetical mechanism underlying PMA-mediated hK2P18.1 activation, control experiments were performed with the inactive analogue 4α-PMA using the ramp protocol. 4α-PMA did not produce significant current augmentation after an incubation time of 30 min compared with time controls (I4α-PMA/Icontrol= 1.11 ± 0.13; n= 5; P= 0.39), ruling out any non-specific interaction of PMA with hK2P18.1 proteins (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open rectification of hK2P18.1 currents elicited by voltage ramps from −140 to +60 mV. (A) Representative current traces in the absence and presence of 100 nM PMA are superimposed, revealing 2.52 ± 0.21-fold current activation (n= 5; P= 0.06) in comparison to control currents (bath solution; 30 min). (B) 4α-PMA, an inactive analogue of PMA, used as negative control, did not activate hK2P18.1 currents (n= 5; P= 0.39).

Additional PKC activators were applied to further elucidate hK2P18.1 activation. First, OAG was tested; OAG is a naturally occurring DAG that activates both conventional and nPKC isoenzymes. However, OAG application (10 µM; 30 min) did not significantly affect hK2P18.1 currents (1.04 ± 0.06-fold change; n= 5; P= 0.15) (Figure 3A). OAG is a less potent PKC activator than PMA, which could explain its lack of efficacy under the given experimental conditions. Next, the isoenzyme-specific activator of cPKCs, TMX, was tested (Ryves et al., 1991). Whole-cell hK2P18.1 currents determined after TMX incubation (100 nM; 30 min) were not significantly modified (1.10 ± 0.06-fold change; n= 5; P= 0.28), ruling out any relevant contribution of cPKCs to hK2P18.1 activation (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Protein kinase-dependent modulation of PMA-dependent IK2P18.1 activation. (A) Efficacy of selected PKC agonists. Neither OAG (10 µM; 30 min) nor TMX (100 nM; 30 min), an activator of conventional PKC isoenzymes, caused significant hK2P18.1 current activation (n= 5 each) compared with time control experiments (n= 7). PMA-induced current activation is provided as reference (n= 7). (B–K) Oocytes were pre-incubated with different PKC or PKA inhibitors before the application of 100 nM PMA (30 min). (B–E) Administration of staurosporine, Bis I and chelerythrine did not significantly modulate IK2P18.1 compared with time controls (4 mM K+), whereas Ro-32-0432 slightly reduced IK2P18.1. (F) The PKA inhibitor KT 5720 (2.5 µM, 30 min) significantly reduced the increase in current induced by PMA (*P < 0.05 vs. time controls). (G) The broad spectrum PKC inhibitor staurosporine did not modulate PMA-dependent activation. (H–J) Selective PKC inhibition by Ro-32-0432, Bis I or chelerythrine reduced the effect of 100 nM PMA. (K) hK2P18.1 current activation induced by dual incubation in KT 5720 and PMA was not different from that observed after PMA treatment. #P < 0.05; ###P < 0.001 versus 100 nM PMA.

hK2P18.1 current activation is PKC-dependent

To investigate whether PMA-induced hK2P18.1 activation is mediated by PKC or by cross-talk with PKA-dependent signal transduction, PMA was applied together with protein kinase inhibitors. In addition, control measurements were performed for each pharmacological inhibitor to evaluate effects of selective PKA/PKC inhibition in the absence of kinase stimulation. For co-administration of PMA and inhibitors, cells were first pre-incubated with the respective compound (1 µM staurosporine, 1–2 h; 3 µM Ro-32-0432, 3–4 h; 1 µM Bis I, 2–3 h; 2.5 µM KT 5720, 30 min; Figure 3B–F) before PMA effects were determined (30 min; 100 nM PMA + PKA/PKC inhibitor; Figure 3G–K). Chelerythrine (10 µM) was applied for 30 min in the absence (Figure 3E) or presence of 100 nM PMA (Figure 3K) without drug pre-incubation.

The non-specific protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine produced a hK2P18.1 current increase (1.36 ± 0.22-fold; n= 6; P= 0.70) that was not significantly different from the run-up observed under control conditions (4 mM K+ solution; 30 min) (Figure 3B). No difference (P= 0.74) was observed between current activation after co-application of PMA and staurosporine (3.30 ± 0.48-fold; n= 7) and PMA alone (3.11 ± 0.22-fold; n= 7) (Figure 3G). Specific inhibition of PKC was achieved using three selective inhibitors, Ro-32-0432, Bis I and chelerythrine. These drugs were previously shown to inhibit PKC in Xenopus oocytes (Barros et al., 1998; Skeberdis et al., 2001; Karle et al., 2002; Kathöfer et al., 2003; Thomas et al., 2004; Kiesecker et al., 2006; Scherer et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2007; Zitron et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2010). PMA-dependent hK2P18.1 activation was reduced by Ro-32-0432 (−43.0%; n= 5; P < 0.001) or Bis I (−25.2%; n= 6; P= 0.015) (Figure 3H and I), respectively, confirming a significant contribution of PKC to the response. The apparent attenuation of PMA-induced hK2P18.1 activation by chelerythrine did not reach statistical significance (−18.6%; n= 5; P= 0.067) (Figure 3J). In the absence of PMA, Ro-32-0432 caused only a small reduction in the hK2P18.1 current (0.94 ± 0.02-fold inhibition; n= 6; P= 0.04), while Bis I (1.03 ± 0.03-fold change; n= 5; P= 0.11) and chelerythrine (0.97 ± 0.07-fold change; n= 5; P= 0.08) had no significant effects compared with time controls (Figure 3C–E), indicating negligible baseline PKC activity.

PKC-dependent hK2P18.1 activation might involve cross-talk with PKA pathways. Inhibition of hK2P18.1 by PKA (Czirjak and Enyedi, 2010) was confirmed by significant current activation (2.09 ± 0.28-fold; n= 5; P= 0.04) upon application of 2.5 µM KT 5720, a specific PKA inhibitor, for 30 min (Figure 3F). However, combined treatment with KT 5720 (2.5 µM) and PMA (100 nM) increased hK2P18.1 by 3.56 ± 0.20-fold (n= 5), similar to the current increase observed after PMA treatment alone(P= 0.17) (Figure 3K).

Significance of hK2P18.1 subunit phosphorylation in PMA-induced current activation

To distinguish between a direct action of PKC on hK2P18.1 channels and indirect effects via intermediate signalling cascades, putative PKC consensus sequences in hK2P18.1 were identified and replaced by alanine residues (S162A, S178A, S184A, S205A, S224A, T161A, T216A, T239A) (Figure 4A). All cRNAs expressed in Xenopus oocytes yielded functional potassium channels with kinetics similar to wild-type (WT) channels (data not shown). Oocytes were injected with the same amount of cRNAs (14 ng) for mutated and WT channels 3 days before the electrophysiological measurements. Relative PMA-induced channel activation (100 nM; 30 min) compared with WT currents was not significantly attenuated in any of the mutants tested (Figure 4B). Thus, direct PKC-mediated phosphorylation of hK2P18.1 proteins at single phosphorylation sites investigated here was not required for PMA-triggered current activation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mutation of putative PKC sites in hK2P18.1 did not abolish activation by PMA. (A) Hypothetical membrane folding model showing a single hK2P18.1 α-subunit consisting of four TM and two pore (P) domains. The large intracellular loop connects TM2 with TM3 and harbours NFAT-like and 14-3-3 protein-binding sites. Predicted PKC phosphorylation sites were replaced with alanine residues. (B) Relative current activation of hK2P18.1 mutants after PMA application (100 nM, 30 min) compared with wild-type channels (n= 5–7 cells). (C) PMA-mediated hK2P18.1 stimulation was independent of calcineurin activity. The calcineurin inhibitor CsA (1 µM) did not affect hK2P18.1 currents after 30 min (n= 5) compared with time controls (n= 7). In addition, stimulation of CsA-pretreated cells with PMA (100 nM) had no effect on current activation (n= 5) compared with PMA administration in the absence of CsA (n= 7).

The PMA-induced hK2P18.1 activation is independent of calcineurin

Mobilization of cellular calcium enables calcineurin to bind to an NFAT-like binding site in the intracellular loop of K2P18.1, leading to channel activation (Czirjak et al., 2004). PKC and calcineurin interact in response to myocardial stretch (Vincent et al., 2006). Thus, we tested whether this interaction is relevant to PMA-dependent hK2P18.1 activation. Inhibition of calcineurin, using CsA 1 µM, did not modulate hK2P18.1 currents at baseline (Figure 4C). Cells were pre-incubated for 2–2.5 h in 1 µM CsA solution before the application of PMA, followed by treatment with CsA and 100 nM PMA for 30 min (n= 5). Current activation by PMA was not affected by CsA (P= 0.34) (Figure 4C), ruling out a significant contribution of calcineurin to PKC-dependent hK2P18.1 activation.

Discussion

We demonstrated that PKC activates hK2P18.1 (TRESK); this represents a previously unrecognized regulatory pathway of neuronal excitability. The present results also indicate that PKC-induced hK2P18.1 current activation is independent of direct phosphorylation of the ion channel protein. Activation (as opposed to inhibition) of K2P18.1 by Gq protein-coupled intracellular signalling is unique among K2P channels (Enyedi and Czirjak, 2010). The underlying molecular pathways were investigated by analysing the effects of protein kinase activators and inhibitors on WT hK2P18.1 channels and using PKC site-deficient channel proteins.

PKC-dependent signalling mechanisms regulate IK2P18.1

PKC stimulation by PMA led to robust hK2P18.1 channel activation in a dose-dependent manner (EC50= 7.9 nM) (Figure 1). In contrast to activation of human K2P18.1, the murine orthologue was reported to be insensitive to 100 nM PMA (Sano et al., 2003). Mouse and human K2P18.1 channels share relatively low homology (65%; Enyedi and Czirjak, 2010), providing a molecular basis for species-specific regulation of K2P18.1.

PKC isoforms are grouped into three subtypes. While conventional cPKCs (isoforms α, βI, βII, γ) require calcium and/or DAG for activation, nPKCs (isoforms δ, ε, η, θ) can be activated by DAG but are insensitive to calcium, and atypical PKCs (aPKCs) (isoforms ζ and ι/λ) are unresponsive to calcium or DAG (Ron and Kazanietz, 1999; Thomas et al., 2003). Phorbol esters activate cPKC and nPKC isoforms but do not affect aPKC. K2P18.1 stimulation could not be mimicked by OAG or the specific cPKC activator TMX (activating cPKC isoforms) (Figure 3). However, pre-incubation of cells with PKC inhibitors (Ro-32-0432, Bis I, chelerythrine) reduced PMA-dependent hK2P18.1 channel activation, implicating the involvement of nPKC isoenzymes that are activated by PMA but insensitive to TMX (Figure 3).

Protein kinase regulation of K2P channels through channel phosphorylation has been demonstrated in previous studies (Fink et al., 1996; Patel et al., 1998; Maingret et al., 2000; Koh et al., 2001; Gu et al., 2002; Honoréet al., 2002; Besana et al., 2004; Murbartian et al., 2005; Kang et al., 2007; Veale et al., 2007; Cain et al., 2008; Czirjak et al., 2008; Czirjak and Enyedi, 2010; Mant et al., 2011; Seyler et al., 2011). To address the involvement of hK2P18.1 phosphorylation in the response to PMA, alanine scanning mutagenesis was performed on putative PKC sites located in the intracellular loop connecting TM2 and TM3. Mutation of PKC sites did not alter PMA-induced current stimulation, suggesting that PMA-dependent activation of hK2P18.1 currents is not mediated by direct phosphorylation of channel subunits at putative consensus sites tested in this study (Figure 4). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that other less specific seronine/threonine residues or a combination of multiple putative phosphorylation sites are targeted by PKC. Maximum stimulation of hK2P18.1 channels was observed after 30 min. A similar time course was reported with PMA-induced modulation of human ether-a-go-go-related gene channels via intermediate signalling (Thomas et al., 2003), supporting the hypothesis that intermediate signal transduction mechanisms mediated hK2P18.1 activation observed in the present study.

Signalling cross-talk between regulatory pathways

K2P18.1 regulation by calcineurin and PKA has been reported previously (Czirjak et al., 2004; Czirjak and Enyedi, 2010). In mice, K2P18.1 channels are activated by calcineurin that binds to an NFAT-like binding site and consequently de-phosphorylates a cluster of serine residues (S274, S276, S279), thereby increasing channel activity. Both, the NFAT-like motif and the serine cluster (S262, S264, S267) are found in human K2P18.1 as well (Figure 4). Calcineurin inhibition using CsA did not modulate PMA-induced hK2P18.1 activation, ruling out the possibility that any relevant interactions between PKC- and calcineurin-dependent pathways are involved in this response (Figure 4). Furthermore, PKA-dependent inhibition of K2P18.1 was confirmed in our study. Current increase upon application of the PKA inhibitor KT 5720 is consistent with reduced inhibitory baseline PKA activity (Figure 3). However, the magnitude of the K2P18.1 current induced by PMA was similar in the absence or presence of KT 5720, potentially indicating that PMA increased K2P18.1 current irrespective of PKA blockade. Independent modulatory pathways of PKA inhibition by KT 5720 (∼2-fold current increase; Figure 3F) and of PKC activation by PMA (∼3-fold current increase; Figure 3K) were expected to produce a cumulative current increase, but this was not observed. These findings could be explained by entirely independent pathways of PKC- and PKA-dependent stimulation of K2P18.1 that are limited by maximum current enhancement. Alternatively, activation of PKC may prevent additional current increase by KT 5720 by preserving the baseline PKA inhibition, and vice versa. This mechanism of action could be exerted via changes in channel conformation.

The non-specific protein kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, did not modulate the hK2P18.1 current response to PMA. Staurosporine blocks kinase activity by preventing the binding of ATP to ATP-dependent protein kinases. This drug also affects PKC, PKA and additional enzymes including PKG, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and myosin light chain kinase. Furthermore, staurosporine modulates pathways involved in cell growth and apoptosis. The apparent lack of effect observed with staurosporine in this work may be explained by multiple antagonistic actions of staurosporine on hK2P18.1 channel function through regulation of PKA and PKC activity. These effects presumably offset each other under baseline conditions and allow for unaltered channel response to PMA (Figure 3).

Conclusion

We describe a novel regulatory pathway of hK2P18.1 (TRESK) activation via PKC stimulation. We hypothesize that activation of hK2P18.1 is mediated through intermediate signalling pathway components. Further studies are required to elucidate intracellular mechanisms of K2P18.1 activation. Loss of K2P18.1 function as a result of a frame shift mutation is associated with migraine in humans. Thus, PKC-dependent activation of K2P18.1 background currents implies a novel therapeutic strategy. Investigation of the underlying pathway and screening for more selective agonists may identify treatment alternatives for migraine and other K2P18.1-related disorders.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr C. Spencer Yost for providing human K2P18.1 cDNA and C. Seyler for advice. We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical support of C. Jeckel and R. Bloehs. This study was supported in part by research grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FRONTIERS programme to DT), the ADUMED foundation (to DT), the German Heart Foundation/German Foundation of Heart Research (to DT) and the Max-Planck-Society (TANDEM project to PAS). JG is a fellow of the MD/PhD programme at the University of Heidelberg.

Glossary

Bis

I, bisindolylmaleimide I

CsA

cyclosporine A

DMSO

dimethyl sulfoxide

K2P

two-pore-domain K+ channel

NFAT

nuclear factor of activated T cells

OAG

2-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol

PMA

phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate

RMP

resting membrane potential

TM

transmembrane domain

TMX

thymeleatoxin

TRESK

TWIK-related spinal cord K+ channel

TWIK

tandem of P domains in a weak inward rectifying K+ channel

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th Edition. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(Suppl. 1):S1–S324. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01649_1.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barros F, Gomez-Varela D, Viloria CG, Palomero T, Giraldez T, de la Pena P. Modulation of human erg K+ channel gating by activation of a G protein-coupled receptor and protein kinase C. J Physiol. 1998;511:333–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.333bh.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bautista DM, Sigal YM, Milstein AD, Garrison JL, Zorn JA, Tsuruda PR, et al. Pungent agents from Szechuan peppers excite sensory neurons by inhibiting two-pore potassium channels. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:772–779. doi: 10.1038/nn.2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Besana A, Barbuti A, Tateyama MA, Symes AJ, Robinson RB, Feinmark SJ. Activation of protein kinase C epsilon inhibits the two-pore domain K+ channel, TASK-1, inducing repolarization abnormalities in cardiac ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33154–33160. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403525200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cain SM, Meadows HJ, Dunlop J, Bushell TJ. mGlu4 potentiation of K(2P)2.1 is dependent on C-terminal dephosphorylation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008;37:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chae YJ, Zhang J, Au P, Sabbadini M, Xie GX, Yost CS. Discrete change in volatile anesthetic sensitivity in mice with inactivated tandem pore potassium ion channel TRESK. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1326–1337. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f90ca5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen J, Chen K, Sroubek J, Wu ZY, Thomas D, Bian JS, et al. Post-transcriptional control of HERG potassium channel protein by α-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Mol Pharmacol. 2010;78:186–197. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.062216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Czirjak G, Enyedi P. Targeting of calcineurin to an NFAT-like docking site is required for the calcium-dependent activation of the background K+ channel, TRESK. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:14677–14682. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602495200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Czirjak G, Enyedi P. TRESK background K(+) channel is inhibited by phosphorylation via two distinct pathways. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:14549–14557. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.102020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Czirjak G, Toth ZE, Enyedi P. The two-pore domain K+ channel, TRESK, is activated by the cytoplasmic calcium signal through calcineurin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:18550–18558. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312229200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Czirjak G, Vuity D, Enyedi P. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of 14-3-3 proteins controls TRESK regulation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:15672–15680. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800712200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dobler T, Springauf A, Tovornik S, Weber M, Schmitt A, Sedlmeier R, et al. TRESK two-pore-domain K+ channels constitute a significant component of background potassium currents in murine dorsal root ganglion neurones. J Physiol. 2007;585:867–879. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Enyedi P, Czirjak G. Molecular background of leak K+ currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:559–605. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fink M, Duprat F, Lesage F, Reyes R, Romey G, Heurteaux C, et al. Cloning, functional expression and brain localization of a novel unconventional outward rectifier K+ channel. EMBO J. 1996;15:6854–6862. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gierten J, Ficker E, Bloehs R, Schlomer K, Kathofer S, Scholz E, et al. Regulation of two-pore-domain (K2P) potassium leak channels by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:1680–1690. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gierten J, Ficker E, Bloehs R, Schweizer PA, Zitron E, Scholz E, et al. The human cardiac K2P3.1 (TASK-1) potassium leak channel is a molecular target for the class III antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2010;381:261–270. doi: 10.1007/s00210-009-0454-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gierten J, Hassel D, Schweizer PA, Becker R, Katus HA, Thomas D. Identification and functional characterization of zebrafish K(2P)10.1 (TREK2) two-pore-domain K(+) channels. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1818:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldstein SA, Bockenhauer D, O'Kelly I, Zilberberg N. Potassium leak channels and the KCNK family of two-P-domain subunits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:175–184. doi: 10.1038/35058574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gu W, Schlichthörl G, Hirsch JR, Engels H, Karschin C, Karschin A, et al. Expression pattern and functional characteristics of two novel splice variants of the two-pore-domain potassium channel TREK-2. J Physiol. 2002;539:657–668. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Honoré E, Maingret F, Lazdunski M, Patel AJ. An intracellular proton sensor commands lipid- and mechano-gating of the K(+) channel TREK-1. EMBO J. 2002;21:2968–2976. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang D, Kim D. TREK-2 (K2P10.1) and TRESK (K2P18.1) are major background K+ channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;291:C138–C146. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00629.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kang D, Choe C, Cavanaugh E, Kim D. Properties of single two-pore domain TREK-2 channels expressed in mammalian cells. J Physiol. 2007;583:57–69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karle CA, Zitron E, Zhang W, Wendt-Nordahl G, Kathöfer S, Thomas D, et al. The human cardiac inwardly-rectifying K+ channel Kir2.1b is inhibited by direct protein kinase C-dependent regulation in human isolated cardiomyocytes and in an expression system. Circulation. 2002;106:1493–1499. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000029747.53262.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kathöfer S, Röckl K, Zhang W, Thomas D, Katus H, Kiehn J, et al. Human β3-adrenoceptors couple to KvLQT1/minK potassium channels via protein kinase C phosphorylation of the KvLQT1 protein. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003;368:119–126. doi: 10.1007/s00210-003-0772-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Keshavaprasad B, Liu C, Au JD, Kindler CH, Cotten JF, Yost CS. Species-specific differences in response to anesthetics and other modulators by the K2P channel TRESK. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1042–1049. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000168447.87557.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiehn J, Thomas D, Karle CA, Schols W, Kubler W. Inhibitory effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone on cloned HERG potassium channels. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1999;359:212–219. doi: 10.1007/pl00005344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiesecker C, Zitron E, Scherer D, Lueck S, Bloehs R, Scholz EP, et al. Regulation of cardiac inwardly rectifying potassium current IK1 and Kir2.x channels by endothelin-1. J Mol Med. 2006;84:46–56. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0707-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koh SD, Monaghan K, Sergeant GP, Ro S, Walker RL, Sanders KM, et al. TREK-1 regulation by nitric oxide and cGMP-dependent protein kinase. An essential role in smooth muscle inhibitory neurotransmission. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:44338–44346. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108125200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lafreniere RG, Cader MZ, Poulin JF, Andres-Enguix I, Simoneau M, Gupta N, et al. A dominant-negative mutation in the TRESK potassium channel is linked to familial migraine with aura. Nat Med. 2010;16:1157–1160. doi: 10.1038/nm.2216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu C, Au JD, Zou HL, Cotten JF, Yost CS. Potent activation of the human tandem pore domain K channel TRESK with clinical concentrations of volatile anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1715–1722. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136849.07384.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maingret F, Lauritzen I, Patel AJ, Heurteaux C, Reyes R, Lesage F, et al. TREK-1 is a heat-activated background K(+) channel. EMBO J. 2000;19:2483–2491. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mant A, Elliott D, Eyers PA, O'Kelly IM. Protein kinase A is central for forward transport of two-pore domain potassium channels K2P3.1 and K2P9.1. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:14110–14119. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Murbartian J, Lei Q, Sando JJ, Bayliss DA. Sequential phosphorylation mediates receptor- and kinase-induced inhibition of TREK-1 background potassium channels. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30175–30184. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503862200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nishizuka Y. Turnover of inositol phospholipids and signal transduction. Science. 1984;225:1365–1370. doi: 10.1126/science.6147898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Patel AJ, Honoré E, Maingret F, Lesage F, Fink M, Duprat F, et al. A mammalian two pore domain mechano-gated S-like K+ channel. EMBO J. 1998;17:4283–4290. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ron D, Kazanietz MG. New insights into the regulation of protein kinase C and novel phorbol ester receptors. FASEB J. 1999;13:1658–1676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ryves WJ, Evans AT, Olivier AR, Parker PJ, Evans FJ. Activation of the PKC-isotypes alpha, beta 1, gamma, delta and epsilon by phorbol esters of different biological activities. FEBS Lett. 1991;288:5–9. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80989-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sano Y, Inamura K, Miyake A, Mochizuki S, Kitada C, Yokoi H, et al. A novel two-pore domain K+ channel, TRESK, is localized in the spinal cord. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27406–27412. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206810200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Scherer D, Kiesecker C, Kulzer M, Gunth M, Scholz EP, Kathofer S, et al. Activation of inwardly rectifying Kir2.x potassium channels by beta(3)-adrenoceptors is mediated via different signalling pathways with a predominant role of PKC for Kir2.1 and of PKA for Kir2.2. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007;375:311–322. doi: 10.1007/s00210-007-0167-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seyler C, Duthil-Straub E, Zitron E, Gierten J, Scholz EP, Fink RHA, et al. TASK1 (K2P3.1) K+ current inhibition by endothelin-1 is mediated by Rho kinase-dependent channel phosphorylation. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;165:1467–1475. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01626.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Skeberdis VA, Lan J, Opitz T, Zheng X, Bennett MV, Zukin RS. mGluR1-mediated potentiation of NMDA receptors involves a rise in intracellular calcium and activation of protein kinase C. Neuropharmacology. 2001;40:856–865. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith HS. Calcineurin as a nociceptor modulator. Pain Physician. 2009;12:E309–E318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Staudacher K, Baldea I, Kisselbach J, Staudacher I, Rahm AK, Schweizer PA, et al. Alternative splicing determines mRNA translation initiation and function of human K2P10.1 K+ channels. J Physiol. 2011a;589:3709–3720. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.210666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Staudacher K, Staudacher I, Ficker E, Seyler C, Gierten J, Kisselbach J, et al. Carvedilol targets human K2P3.1 (TASK1) K+ leak channels. Br J Pharmacol. 2011b;163:1099–1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01319.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas D, Goldstein SAN. Two-P-domain (K2P) potassium channels: leak conductance regulators of excitability. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009. pp. 1207–1220. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas D, Zhang W, Wu K, Wimmer AB, Gut B, Wendt-Nordahl G, et al. Regulation of HERG potassium channel activation by protein kinase C independent of direct phosphorylation of the channel protein. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;59:14–26. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomas D, Wu K, Wimmer AB, Zitron E, Hammerling BC, Kathöfer S, et al. Activation of cardiac human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG/IKr) potassium currents is regulated by α1A-adrenoceptors. J Mol Med. 2004;82:826–837. doi: 10.1007/s00109-004-0582-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomas D, Plant LD, Wilkens CM, McCrossan ZA, Goldstein SA. Alternative translation initiation in rat brain yields K2P2.1 potassium channels permeable to sodium. Neuron. 2008;58:859–870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tulleuda A, Cokic B, Callejo G, Saiani B, Serra J, Gasull X. TRESK channel contribution to nociceptive sensory neurons excitability: modulation by nerve injury. Mol Pain. 2011;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-7-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Veale EL, Kennard LE, Sutton GL, MacKenzie G, Sandu C, Mathie A. G(alpha)q-mediated regulation of TASK3 two-pore domain potassium channels: the role of protein kinase C. Mol Pharmacol. 2007;71:1666–1675. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.033241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Vincent F, Duquesnes N, Christov C, Damy T, Samuel JL, Crozatier B. Dual level of interactions between calcineurin and PKC-epsilon in cardiomyocyte stretch. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;71:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang L, Zhao J, Milutinovic PS, Brosnan RJ, Eger EI, 2nd, Sonner JM. Anesthetic properties of the ketone bodies beta-hydroxybutyric acid and acetone. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:673–679. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278127.68312.dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang W, Zitron E, Hömme M, Kihm L, Morath C, Scherer D, et al. Aquaporin-1 channel function is positively regulated by protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:20933–20940. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703858200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zitron E, Günth M, Scherer D, Kiesecker C, Kulzer M, Bloehs R, et al. Kir2.x inward rectifier potassium channels are differentially regulated by adrenergic alpha(1A) receptors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;44:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES