Skip to main content
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 2001 May;35(3):175–180. doi: 10.1023/A:1013101927350

Calcium phosphate transfection optimization for serum-free suspension culture

Philippe Girard 1,, Luc Porte 2, Temugin Berta 2, Martin Jordan 2, Florian M Wurm 2
PMCID: PMC3449700  PMID: 22358856

Abstract

Aim of this study was to identify optimal conditions for suspension transfection in the absence of serum. Transfection parameters for suspension culture can be very different to ones in adherent cells. Most transfection protocols have been developed and optimizedfor adherent culture. Using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as reporter, FCS was eliminated from the transfection process by altering critical parameters and by substituting serum with albumin. Using standard phosphate and calcium concentrations for transfection in the absence of serum resulted in titers of only 1% of those observed in the presence of serum. A reduction of the calcium concentration from 250 mM to 100 mM, yielded a 25-fold increase in the expression of the recombinant protein compared to the serum-free standard conditions. Altering the phosphate concentration, 1.4 mM in the transfection buffer, did not improve the protein expression. Interestingly, reduction of DNA quantity by half to a concentration of 0.5 μg per milliliter of culture volume resulted in a two-fold increase of protein production. Addition of albumin to serum-free medium protected the cells against the toxicity of the calcium phosphate transfection particles (CaPi) yielding higher protein expression. All the experiments were executed in a shaken multi-well system, allowing high multiplicity parameter screening to speed up optimizations. The culture system is inexpensive, simple and efficient, minimizing costs for labor and consumables.

Keywords: calcium, coprecipitation, DNA, HEK293, phosphate, small-scale culture, suspensionculture, transfection, transient geneexpression

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (363.6 KB).

References

  1. Chu G, Sharp PA. SV40 DNA transfection of cells in suspension: analysis of efficiency of transcription and translation of T-antigen. Gene. 1981;13:197–202. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Girard P, Jordan M, Tsao M, Wurm FM. Small scale bioreactor system for process development and optimization. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7:117–119. doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00110-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Graham FL, van der Eb AJ. A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology. 1973;52:456–467. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jordan M, Köhne C, Wurm FM. Calcium-phosphate mediated DNA transfer into HEK-293 cells in suspension: control of physicochemical parameters allows transfection in stirred media Transfection and protein expression in mammalian cells. Cytotechnology. 1998;26:39–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1007917318181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jordan M, Schallhorn A, Wurm FM. Transfecting mammalian cells: optimization of critical parameters affecting calcium-phosphate precipitate formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:596–601. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.4.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meissner P, Girard P, Kulangara A, Tsao MC, Jordan M, Wurm FM. Process development for transient gene expression in mammalian cells at the 3 l scale: 10-50 mg of r-protein in days. In: Bernard A, Griffiths B, Noé W, Wurm F, editors. Animal Cell Technology: Products from Cells, Cells as Products. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. pp. 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  7. Paborsky LR, Fendly BM, Fisher KL, Lawn RM, Marks BJ, McCray G, Tate KM, Vehar GA, Gorman CM. Mammalian cell transient expression of tissue factor for the production of antigen. Protein Eng. 1990;3:547–553. doi: 10.1093/protein/3.6.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seelos C. A critical parameter determining the aging of DNAcalcium-phosphate precipitates. Anal Biochem. 1997;245:109–111. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.9948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Song W, Lahiri DK. Efficient transfection of DNA by mixing cells in suspension with calcium phosphate. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:3609–3611. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.17.3609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Strain A, Wyllie A.Calcium-phosphate - SV40 DNA transfection of cells synchronized in S-phase and in mitosis Eur J Cell Biol 198433196698040 [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilson SP, Liu F, Wilson RE, Housley PR. Optimization of calcium phosphate transfection for bovine chromaffin cells: relationship to calcium phosphate precipitate formation. Anal Biochem. 1995;226:212–120. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson SP, Smith LA. Addition of glycerol during DNA exposure enhances calcium phosphate transfection. Anal Biochem. 1997;246:148–150. doi: 10.1006/abio.1997.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wurm F, Bernard A. Large-scale transient expression in mammalian cells for recombinant protein production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10:156–159. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yen T, Wang Y, Seto E. DNA transfection into suspension cell-lines with a modified calcium-phosphate precipitate method. BioTechniques. 1988;6:413–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES