Abstract
The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the overall incidence and distribution of lumbo-sacral degenerative changes (i.e. disc protrusion or extrusion, facet degeneration, disc degeneration, nerve root canal stenosis and spinal stenosis) in patients with and without a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra (LSTV). The study population consisted of 350 sequential patients with low back pain and/or sciatica, referred for medical imaging. In all cases CT scans of the lumbosacral region were obtained. In 53 subjects (15%) an LSTV was found. There was no difference in overall incidence of degenerative spine changes between the two groups. We did find, however, a different distribution pattern of degenerative changes between patients with and those without an LSTV Disc protrusion and/or extrusion occurred more often at the level suprajacent to the LSTV than at the same level in patients without LSTV (45.3% vs 30.3%). This was also the case for disc degeneration (52.8% vs 28%), facet degeneration (60.4% vs 42.6%) and nerve root canal stenosis (52.8% vs 27.9%). For spinal canal stenosis there was no statistically significant difference between the two categories. In conclusion, our findings indicate that an LSTV does not in itself constitute a risk factor for degenerative spine changes, but when degeneration occurs, it is more likely to be found at the disc level above the LSTV.
Key words: Transitional vertebrae, Suprajacent degenerations, Spine CT
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (891.3 KB).
References
- 1.Eisenstein S. Lumbar vertebral canal morphometry for computerized tomography in spinal stenosis. Spine. 1983;8:187–191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elster AD. Quadriplegia after minor trauma in the Klippel-Feil syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66:1473–1474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elster AD. Bertolotti's Syndrome Revisited. Transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1989;14:1373–1377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Elster AD, Jensen KM. Computed tomography of spondylolisthesis: patterns of associated pathology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985;9:867–874. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198509000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hahn PY, Strobel JJ, Hahn FJ. Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transi tional vertebrae. Radiology. 1992;182:580–581. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.2.1732988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadski MN, Obuchowski N, Medic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:69–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee BCP, Kazam E, Newman AD. Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord. Radiology. 1978;128:95–102. doi: 10.1148/128.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nachemson AL. The lumbar spine — an orthopaedic challenge. Spine. 1970;l:59–71. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nicholson AA, Roberts GM, Williams LA. The measured height of the lumbosacral disc in patients with and without transitional vertebrae. Br J Radiol. 1988;61:454–455. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-61-726-454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rosenberg NJ. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1975;57:467–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siegle RL. Imaging in internal medicine. Boston: Little, Brown; 1986. p. 171. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Southwood JD, Bersack SR. Anomalies of the lumbosacral junction in 550 patients without symptoms referable to the low back. AIR. 1950;64:624–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ullrich CG, Binet EP, Sanecki MG, Kieffer SA. Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Radiology. 1980;134:137–143. doi: 10.1148/radiology.134.1.7350593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weismann BNW, Sledge CB. Orthopedic radiology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1986. pp. 298–301. [Google Scholar]