Abstract
Purpose: The presence of a clear half-moon-like zone of cytoplasm in oocytes is called “halo effect.” The prognostic value of this effect is not yet determined. Aligned nucleoli in pronuclei (PN) represent a further polarization phenomenon and a marker for implantation potential. Aim of the prospective study was to evaluate the influence of the halo effect on IVF outcome and to compare the results with observed polarization in PN.
Methods: A total of 374 cycles with embryonic transfer were analyzed regarding halo effect and pattern of nucleoli. The oocytes were single-cultured to observe the following embryo quality of each PN stage.
Results: Cycles with halo-positive oocytes showed a significant higher pregnancy rate (44.0% vs. 31.1%; p < 0.05). Furthermore, higher pregnancy rates in cycles with polarized nucleoli were observed. Polarized PN resulted in a significant lower fragmentation and higher cleavage rate of embryos. The fragmentation rate was significantly lower in halo+ oocytes, but the cleavage rate was not influenced.
Conclusions: The results indicate that the presence of a polarized zone of human fertilized oocytes can be a useful indicator for good oocyte quality. Since the origin of ooplasmic polarization seems to be a different process compared with the alignment of nucleoli, the observation will give additional predictive information about the implantation potential.
Keywords: Embryo quality, halo effect, oocyte, polarization, pronuclei
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Denker HW. Cell lineage, determination and differentiation in earliest developmental stages in mammals. Biblog Anat. 1983;24:22–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gardner RL. Polarity in early mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999;9:417–421. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)80063-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gardner RL. Scrambled or bisected mouse eggs and the basis of patterning in mammals. Bioessays. 1999;21:271–274. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199904)21:4<271::AID-BIES2>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selwood L. Mechanisms for pattern formation leading to axis formation and lineage allocation in mammals:Amarsupial perspective. Reproduction. 2001;5:677–683. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Edwards RG, Beard HK. Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997;10:863–905. doi: 10.1093/molehr/3.10.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Edwards RG. The role of embryonic polarities in preimplantation growth and implantation of mammalian embryos. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(Suppl6):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scott LA. Oocyte and embryo polarity. Sem Reprod Med. 2000;18:171–183. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Van Blerkom J, Davis P. Evolution of the sperm aster after microinjection of isolated human sperm centrosomesinto meiotically mature human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2179–2182. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum IM. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1267–1270. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers in the day following oocyte retrival. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1003–1013. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1318–1323. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score:Apredictive embryoscoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an invitro-fertilization and embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koyama H, Suzuki H, Yang X, Jiang S, Foote RH. Analysis of polarity of bovine and rabbit embryos by scanning electron microscopy. Biol Reprod. 1994;50:163–170. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod50.1.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santella L, Alikani M, Talansky BE, Cohen J, Dale B. Is the human oocyte plasma membrane polarized? Hum Reprod. 1992;7:999–1003. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Calarco PG. Polarization of mitochondria in the unfertilized mouse oocyte. Dev Genet. 1995;16:36–43. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020160108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Antczak M, Van Blerkom J. Temporal and spartial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: Possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:429–447. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.2.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van der Ven H, Montag M. Multicentre-study to determine the possible correlation between pronuclear morphology and success or ART treatment. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]