Abstract
Random insertional mutagenesis performed on a Lactococcus lactis reporter strain led us to identify L. lactis ybdD as a protein-overproducing mutant. In different expression contexts, the ybdD mutant shows increased levels of exported proteins and therefore constitutes a new and attractive heterologous protein production host. This study also highlights the importance of unknown regulatory processes that play a role during protein secretion.
TEXT
The food-grade Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis constitutes an interesting host for the production of heterologous secreted proteins to develop either nutraceuticals or new live-vaccine delivery systems (2, 5, 13, 19). However, yields are usually low. Production and secretion systems as well as engineered strains designed to increase the amounts and quality of secreted heterologous proteins have been established in L. lactis. This has been done by modifying either the secreted protein itself (11, 12) or the expression of host proteins that could be directly or indirectly involved in protein production (16, 21). We previously performed a random insertional mutagenesis in L. lactis strain MG usp-nucT, carrying a chromosome-inserted expression cassette that induces the production of UspNucT, a poorly secreted form of staphylococcal nuclease (NucT) fused to the signal peptide of the secreted protein Usp45 (25) (SPUsp) used as a reporter to identify accessory genes encoding such host proteins. Nuc activity plate assay screening led to the isolation of mutants that were modified in their capacity to produce NucT (20). In this study, we focused on the ybdD mutant, in which NucT production was increased.
Spot tests performed on TBD agar plates identified three mutants with significantly higher nuclease activities than the control strain MG usp–nucT; all contained pGhost:ISS1 integrations that mapped in the ybdD gene (Fig. 1A). We confirmed that this phenotype was not associated with pGhost9:ISS1 insertion in the chromosome. After pGhost9:ISS1 excision (15, 20), we compared the secretion profile of the ybdD usp–nucT (mutant I27; Fig. 1) mutant to the one obtained with the MG usp–nucT parental strain by Western blot analysis. Increased amounts of both intracellular precursor SPUsp-NucT (pre-NucT) and secreted mature NucT were observed in the ybdD mutant (Fig. 1B). This result was confirmed by nuclease (Nuc) assay (23) (Fig. 1C).
Fig 1.
Isolation of the L. lactis ybdD overproducer mutant. (A) Nuclease activity plate assay of the three isolated ybdD mutants where pGhost9:ISS1 (20) insertions occurred in the coding sequence of ybdD at nucleotide positions 495 (mutant I27), 597 (mutant I32), and 867 (mutant I8) with respect to the ATG start codon, allowing expression of a truncated form of YbdD leaving 54.2%, 65.4% and 95% of its N-terminal region. The same volumes of OD600-adjusted stationary-growth-phase cultures of the three single ybdD mutants were spotted on TBD agar plates (10). (B) NucT secretion profile comparison obtained in MG usp–nucT and the ybdD usp–nucT mutant I27. Strains were grown exponentially, and protein samples present in cell (C) and supernatant (S) fractions were extracted and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting using anti-Nuc antibodies. (C) Dosage of active Nuc released in the supernatant by MG usp–nucT and the ybdD usp–nucT mutant using a spectrophotometric nuclease assay (23). Data are means ± standard errors (SE) (n = 8). *, P < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test).
In order to test the use of the L. lactis ybdD strain as a host for the improved production of heterologous proteins, we evaluated the effect of ybdD disruption on NucT production under the control of the NICE (for nisin-controlled expression) system (4). The plasmid pSEC:NucT carrying the expression cassette usp–nucT under the control of PnisA (12) was introduced into two NZ9000 (9) derivatives: NZ(pIL253) (24), used as the negative control, and NZybdD, in which ybdD was inactivated by targeted insertional mutagenesis (14). Quantitative Western blot analysis of the NucT secretion profile obtained in these two strains shows a significant 2-fold increase of both nuclease forms in the ybdD-background strain (Fig. 2A and B), as confirmed by Nuc assay (Fig. 2C). This result demonstrates that the improvement associated with the ybdD-related phenotype is not restricted to heterologous protein expressed under the Pusp control but can also extend to heterologous protein production using another promoter as the NICE system.
Fig 2.
Effect of the ybdD mutation on NucT overexpression driven by the PnisA inducible promoter. NucT production profiles of NZ(pIL253, pSEC:NucT) and NZybdD(pSEC:NucT) were compared. Protein samples from cell (C) and supernatant (S) fractions of exponentially growing cultures induced by 1 ng/ml nisin for 1 h were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-Nuc antibodies (A) and quantified by fluorimetry (B); the total amount of each protein form (cell associated and released in the supernatant) is expressed in arbitrary units (AU) corresponding to the measured signal intensity. (C) Dosage of active nuclease released in the supernatant by NZ(pIL253, pSEC:NucT) and NZybdD(pSEC:NucT) strains using a spectrophotometric Nuc assay. Data are means ± SE (n = 8). *, P < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test).
As the effect of disrupting ybdD was analyzed only for the NucT reporter, an inefficiently secreted form of Nuc, fused to SPUsp, the effect of the ybdD mutation was tested on the production/secretion profile of NucB, an efficiently produced and secreted form of Nuc in L. lactis that is cleaved extracellularly to give rise to the NucA form fused to an alternative efficient lactococcal SP, SPExp4 (17, 22). The plasmid pLB141 carrying the expression cassette PnisA-SPExp4:NucB (17) was introduced into the strains NZybdD and NZ(pIL253). Western blot analysis of the Nuc secretion profile in these two strains shows a significant 2-fold increase of both detected forms of nuclease in the ybdD context (Fig. 3A and B), as confirmed by Nuc assay (Fig. 3C). This result shows that the ybdD mutation is not restricted to an inefficiently produced and secreted heterologous protein and to a SPUsp45 secretion-driven protein. Moreover, production analysis of the major L. lactis secreted protein Usp45 (25) using Coomassie blue staining shows a similar ∼2-fold increase in the amounts of Usp45 in the culture medium of the ybdD usp–nucT mutant compared to the wild-type strain (data not shown), showing that the ybdD-related phenotype is not Nuc specific.
Fig 3.
Effect of ybdD mutation on Nuc secretion driven by the SPExp4 under the control of the inducible promoter PnisA. NucB secretion profiles of NZ(pIL253, pLB141) and NZybdD (pLB141) are compared. Protein samples from cell (C) and supernatant (S) fractions of exponentially growing cultures induced by 1 ng/ml nisin during 1 h were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-Nuc antibodies (A) and quantified by fluorimetry (B). Total amounts of the precursor form and both secreted forms (cell associated and released in the supernatant [NucB and NucA]) of the protein are expressed in arbitrary units (AU) corresponding to the measured signal intensity. (C) Dosage of active nuclease released in the supernatant by NZ(pIL253, pLB141) and NZybdD(pLB141) strains using a spectrophotometric Nuc assay. Data are means ± SE (n = 6). *, P < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test).
Together, our results show that the ybdD mutant constitutes a very attractive host strain for achieving an improved yield of heterologous secreted proteins in biotechnological applications. It would be of interest to analyze the effect of the ybdD mutation combined with numerous tools previously described as enhancers of production of heterologous secreted protein in L. lactis (17). Achieving a synergistic effect with the ybdD mutant would contribute to making L. lactis a more efficient cell factory for biotechnological applications.
As the ybdD effect was observed only on secreted proteins, we tested the production-improving ybdD-related phenotype on different cellular protein localizations by using either a cell-wall anchored form of the Nuc reporter or a cytoplasmic one. The plasmid pANC2608 carrying an expression cassette encoding the precursor SPUsp:NucA:CWAM6 (pre-NucAnc) under the transcriptional control of P59 was introduced into MG usp–nucT and the ybdD usp–nucT mutant, resulting in strain MG usp–nucT(pANC:NucA) and the ybdD usp–nucT(pANC:NucA) mutant. Two forms of cell wall-anchored Nuc were detected in the cell fraction: pre-NucAnc and cell wall-anchored NucAnc (Fig. 4A). Compared to the control, both cell wall-anchored nuclease forms were detected in increased amounts in the ybdD mutant (Fig. 4A). This result shows that the production-improving phenotype of the ybdD mutant (i) is not restricted to secreted proteins and (ii) can increase the production of two different heterologous exported proteins in the same strain using two different promoters (Fig. 4). To determine whether the ybdD mutation could act on a cytoplasmic heterologous protein, the plasmid pCYT:Nuc carrying the expression cassette PnisA-Nuc was introduced into NZybdD and NZ(pIL253), resulting in NZybdD(pCYT:NucB) and in NZ(pIL253-pCYT:NucB), respectively. Compared to the control strain, no differences were observed (Fig. 4B). Under PnisA control, the ybdD mutation has an effect only on the exported forms of Nuc.
Fig 4.
Effect of ybdD mutation on differently localized form of Nuc. (Left) Schematic representation of the nuc expression cassettes tested. (Right) Protein samples from cell fractions of exponentially growing cultures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-Nuc antibodies. (A) Coproduction analysis of cell wall-anchored nuclease (NucAnc) and pre-NucT in MG[usp–nucT](pANC:NucA) and the ybdD[usp–nucT](pANC:NucA) mutant. (B) Production analysis of a cytoplasmic form of Nuc induced by 1 ng/ml nisin for 1 h in NZ(pIL253, pCYT:Nuc) and NZybdD(pCYT:Nuc).
According to L. lactis IL1403 genome sequence annotation, ybdD encodes a hypothetical cytoplasmic protein of unknown function belonging to the Jag family of proteins (3). Sequence analysis of YbdD revealed the presence of KH and R3H domains, which are present in proteins acting in close association with single-strand nucleic acid (1, 8, 18). Northern blot analysis revealed greater amounts of nucT and usp45 transcripts in the ybdD[usp–nucT] strain than in the parental strain MG[usp–nucT], suggesting that YbdD could act at the transcriptional step in protein synthesis process (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Assessment of the mRNA levels of other homologous cytoplasmic (Ldh and HslA) and membrane proteins (PmpA and SipL) did not reveal any increase in the ybdD mutant. These observations suggest that ybdD could modulate the expression of some specific exported proteins in L. lactis, addressing the question of YbdD targeting and indicating that the exportation signal is at the protein level. Further functional and molecular characterization of YbdD should be of particular interest, possibly allowing the identification of a new regulator and/or mechanism involved in the exported-protein synthesis process.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
E. Morello was a recipient of a CIFRE grant between Agence Nationale de la Recherche and GTP-Technology Society (Toulouse, France), and S. Nouaille was a recipient of a MENRT grant from the French government.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 27 July 2012
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1. Adinolfi S, et al. 1999. Novel RNA-binding motif: the KH module. Biopolymers 51: 153– 164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bermudez-Humaran LG, et al. 2003. Intranasal immunization with recombinant Lactococcus lactis secreting murine interleukin-12 enhances antigen-specific Th1 cytokine production. Infect. Immun. 71: 1887– 1896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bolotin A, et al. 2001. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 11: 731– 753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM. 1996. Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 3662– 3667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Enouf V, Langella P, Commissaire J, Cohen J, Corthier G. 2001. Bovine rotavirus nonstructural protein 4 produced by Lactococcus lactis is antigenic and immunogenic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 1423– 1428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Reference deleted.
- 7. Reference deleted.
- 8. Grishin NV. 1998. The R3H motif: a domain that binds single-stranded nucleic acids. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 329– 330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kuipers OP, De Ruyter PG, Kleerebezem M, De Vos WM. 1998. Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 64: 15– 21 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Le Loir Y, Gruss A, Ehrlich SD, Langella P. 1994. Direct screening of recombinants in gram-positive bacteria using the secreted staphylococcal nuclease as a reporter. J. Bacteriol. 176: 5135– 5139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Le Loir Y, Gruss A, Ehrlich SD, Langella P. 1998. A nine-residue synthetic propeptide enhances secretion efficiency of heterologous proteins in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 180: 1895– 1903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Le Loir Y, et al. 2001. Signal peptide and propeptide optimization for heterologous protein secretion in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 4119– 4127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Le Loir Y, et al. 2005. Protein secretion in Lactococcus lactis: an efficient way to increase the overall heterologous protein production. Microb. Cell Fact. 4: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Leloup L, Ehrlich SD, Zagorec M, Morel-Deville F. 1997. Single-crossover integration in the Lactobacillus sake chromosome and insertional inactivation of the ptsI and lacL genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 2117– 2123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Maguin E, Prevost H, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. 1996. Efficient insertional mutagenesis in lactococci and other gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178: 931– 935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Miyoshi A, et al. 2002. Controlled production of stable heterologous proteins in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 3141– 3146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Morello E, et al. 2008. Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 48– 58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Musco G, et al. 1996. Three-dimensional structure and stability of the KH domain: molecular insights into the fragile X syndrome. Cell 85: 237– 245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nouaille S, et al. 2003. Heterologous protein production and delivery systems for Lactococcus lactis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2: 102– 111 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nouaille S, et al. 2004. Influence of lipoteichoic acid D-alanylation on protein secretion in Lactococcus lactis as revealed by random mutagenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 1600– 1607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nouaille S, et al. 2006. Complementation of the Lactococcus lactis secretion machinery with Bacillus subtilis SecDF improves secretion of staphylococcal nuclease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2272– 2279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Poquet I, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. 1998. An export-specific reporter designed for gram-positive bacteria: application to Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 180: 1904– 1912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ravn P, Arnau J, Madsen SM, Vrang A, Israelsen H. 2003. Optimization of signal peptide SP310 for heterologous protein production in Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology 149: 2193– 2201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Simon D, Chopin A. 1988. Construction of a vector plasmid family and its use for molecular cloning in Streptococcus lactis. Biochimie 70: 559– 566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van Asseldonk M, et al. 1990. Cloning of usp45, a gene encoding a secreted protein from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363. Gene 95: 155– 160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.