Abstract
The control of cell death is a biological process essential for proper development, and for preventing devastating pathologies like cancer and neurodegeneration. On the other hand, autophagy regulation is essential for protein and organelle degradation, and its dysfunction is associated with overlapping pathologies like cancer and neurodegeneration, but also for microbial infection and aging. In the present report we show that two evolutionarily unrelated receptors—Neurokinin 1 Receptor (NK1R,) a G-protein coupled receptor, and Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF1R), a tyrosine kinase receptor—both induce non-apoptotic cell death with autophagic features and requiring the activity of the autophagic core machinery proteins PI3K-III, Beclin-1 and Atg7. Remarkably, this form of cell death occurs in apoptosis-competent cells. The signal transduction pathways engaged by these receptors both converged on the activation of the nuclear receptor NR4A1, which has previously been shown to play a critical role in some paradigms of apoptosis and in NK1R-induced cell death. The activity of NR4A1 was necessary for IGF1R-induced cell death, as well as for a canonical model of cell death by autophagy induced by the presence of a pan-caspase inhibitor, suggesting that NR4A1 is a general modulator of this kind of cell death. During cell death by autophagy, NR4A1 was transcriptionally competent, even though a fraction of it was present in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, NR4A1 interacts with the tumor suppressor p53 but not with Beclin-1 complex. Therefore the mechanism to promote cell death by autophagy might involve regulation of gene expression, as well as protein interactions. Understanding the molecular basis of autophagy and cell death mediation by NR4A1, should provide novel insights and targets for therapeutic intervention.
Introduction
NR4A1 (also known as Nur77, TR3, and NGFI-B, among other designations) is an orphan nuclear receptor member of the thyroid/steroid receptor superfamily, whose activity and intracellular localization is regulated by phosphorylation, and which plays a role in cell fate decisions [1]. NR4A1 was originally characterized as an immediate early response gene, as it is transiently induced in response to mitogenic factors in quiescent fibroblasts. Despite this initial designation, in response to all-trans retinoic acid NR4A1 may mediate the arrest of cells at the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle [2]. NR4A1 expression is induced by multiple stimuli in different types of cells. Interestingly, this nuclear receptor is also involved in the regulation of cell death induced by stimuli as variable as engagement of the T cell receptor during T cell negative selection, in prostate and lung cancer cells exposed to chemotherapeutic drugs (synthetic retinoid CD437) [3], in macrophage apoptosis [4], or in thapsigargin-induced cell death [5]. Paradoxically, NR4A1 has also been reported to act as a death inhibitory factor, blocking cell death induced by ceramide [6] or by tumor necrosis factor [7]. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms that determine which fate a cell will follow upon NR4A1 activation clearly deserve investigation. Among the different possible outcomes, we are particularly interested in cell death.
Physiological cell death is fundamental to counter cell division and to eliminate harmed cells. During metazoan development, programmed cell death is essential to sculpt organs and to correct erroneous cell migration. While apoptosis is the most common program of cell death, other mechanisms also occur [8], [9], [10]. Mice lacking key apoptotic effectors such as Apaf-1, Bax, Bak, or executioner caspases −3 and −9 show minor developmental abnormalities and reach adulthood [11]. Therefore, alternative, non-apoptotic pathways for cell death may contribute to proper development. Indeed, the death of linker-cells during C. elegans development is independent of the apoptotic machinery, and instead requires a polyglutamine-repeat protein named Pqn-41 [12]. Also, the regression of salivary glands [13] and midgut [14] in Drosophila metamorphosis is mediated by autophagy genes.
Autophagy is a catabolic process every cell undergoes to recycle long-lived proteins and to eliminate damaged macromolecules and organelles; therefore, it helps to maintain the cells' health [15]. It is induced by nutrients and growth factors limitation, allowing the cell to survive for longer periods by recycling components. Autophagy also helps to prevent neurodegeneration by degrading missfolded proteins [16]. However, under some circumstances autophagy promotes cell death by an unknown mechanism. Among the different mechanisms of autophagy, macroautophagy (here referred to as autophagy) is the major one associated to cell death. This type of autophagy is characterized morphologically by the engulfment of cytoplasmic constituents, wrapped by double or multiple membrane sacs called autophagosomes. Lysosomes fuse to the autophagosomes to degrade the cytoplasm-derived contents and the inner membrane.
A form of cell death is defined as autophagic when, in addition of displaying autophagic features, inhibition of the autophagic core machinery prevents it. For example, L929 mouse fibroblasts undergo cell death by autophagy (hence autophagic cell death) triggered by death receptors signaling, since the cell death is dependent on the function of Atg7 and Beclin-1, while the inhibition of caspase-8 during such signaling, although preventing apoptotic cell death, allows a vesiculated cell death [17].
Previously we described a non-apoptotic form of cell death activated by the G-protein coupled receptor of Neurokinin 1 (NK1R) upon ligand engagement by substance P (SP) [18]. NK1R signaling plays a role in numerous biological processes, such as the transmission of pain in the spinal cord [19]. The cell death induced by NK1R/SP is characterized by cytoplasmic vacuolation, lack of caspase activation, lack of inhibition by caspase inhibitors and by Bcl-xL, lack of nuclear fragmentation or membrane blebbing, lack of phosphatidylserine exposure and a requirement for new gene transcription and translation. It is worth to highlight that this form of cell death is activated in apoptotic competent cells [18]. Whether the cytoplasmic vacuolation is related to autophagy has not been evaluated before. The molecular pathway activated by NK1R/SP to promote cell death involves a MAPK signaling cascade initiated by Raf-1, and including specifically MEK2 and ERK2 activity, but not MEK1 or ERK1 [20]. Among the genes induced in response to SP, NR4A1 is of particular interest since it is phosphorylated by ERK2 but not ERK1 [21], and because its induction has been observed in situations in which neuronal death occurs, such as kainic acid-induced seizures [22] and ischemic brain injury [23]. Moreover, in these paradigms, SP signaling is also necessary for neural death [24], [25], [26]. We found that during SP-induced non-apoptotic cell death ERK2 leads to phosphorylation of NR4A1, and that NR4A1 function is essential, since its inhibition by either dominant negative mutants or by RNAi prevents cell death [20].
Interestingly, expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor IGF1R (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) induces a non-apoptotic form of cell death dubbed paraptosis [27], which, in addition to resembling morphologically NK1R/SP-induced death, proved to be mediated also by MEK2 but not MEK1 [28]. IGF1R is widely expressed in the body, including within the brain. Upon IGF1 binding, IGF1R undergoes auto-phosphorylation, associates with intracellular adaptor proteins called IRSs (insulin/IGF1 receptor substrates), and activates either the Akt or the Ras/MEK/ERK signaling pathways (reviewed in [29]). The contribution of autophagy to paraptosis has not been addressed previously.
Taking together the MEK2 requirement in both of these non-apoptotic cell death paradigms, and the role of NR4A1 as an ERK2-specific substrate, we hypothesized that the death signaling cascades mediated by NK1R/SP and IGF1R converge on NR4A1 to promote a similar death program. Since in both cases vesiculated death has been observed, perhaps the autophagic machinery is exploited to produce the vesicles (even though these paradigms have previously been shown to be more similar morphologically to type III than type II pcd). In the present work we found, indeed, that the expression of NR4A1 dominant negative mutants inhibited non-apoptotic cell death in both of these paradigms. Also, we observed autophagic features such as LC3-II protein processing and redistribution, and autophagosomes by ultrastructure electron microcopy analysis. Downregulation of the pro-autophagic genes PI3K-III, Beclin-1 or Atg7 inhibited both IGF1R- and NK1R/SP-induced death. We then inhibited the NR4A1 family in a canonical model of cell death by autophagy, induced by the presence of a caspase inhibitor in mouse fibroblast L929 cells [17], and we observed significant cell death protection. Therefore, NR4A1 acts as a modulator of cell death that depends on autophagy induced by three different stimuli in different cell types. To gain insight into the mechanism of NR4A1 to promote this form of cell death, we examined its intracellular localization. Although most of the cells displayed NR4A1 in the nucleus, 14% of the cells showed it also in the cytoplasm. Using a luciferase reporter gene we found that NR4A1 is transcriptionally competent during cell death, suggesting that NR4A1 could acts at least in part by regulating gene transcription. Considering that the cytoplasmic fraction could also contribute to cell death, potential NR4A1 interaction partners were evaluated. We found that NR4A1 did not interact with Beclin-1 complex, although it interacted with the tumor suppressor p53, which is an autophagy regulator [30]. Because NR4A1 has previously been shown to be a mediator of apoptotic cell death, as well, we propose that NR4A1 is a key regulator of cell fate, mediating both apoptotic and non-apoptotic forms of cell death.
Results
IGF1R induces non-apoptotic cell death through NR4A1 activation
Considering the morphological resemblance between NK1R/SP [18]- and IGF1R-induced death [27], and the activation of the same MAPK pathway (namely MEK2), we tested the requirement of NR4A1 activity for non-apoptotic pcd induced by IGF1R.
NR4A1 displays multiple pro-apoptotic mechanisms, including transcription of pro-apoptotic genes, translocation to the mitochondria [31], and translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum [32] to modulate the function of Bcl2 family members [33]. These actions lead to cytochrome c release from mitochondria and caspase activation. Two different NR4A1 dominant negative mutants inhibit apoptosis: one mutant lacks the DNA binding domain (NR4A1ΔDBD), and inhibits its transcriptional activity, whereas the other one lacks the trans-activating domain (NR4A1ΔN152), and inhibits NR4A1 translocation to mitochondria [31] (although the latter mutant may also prevent transcriptional activity). We observed that both mutants significantly reduced IGF1R-induced death (Fig. 1), suggesting that NR4A1 transcriptional activity is necessary for cell death in this paradigm. Therefore, the cell death pathways activated by both SP/NK1R and IGF1R share morphological hallmarks, and the molecular mechanism(s) requires NR4A1. We therefore refer hereafter to cell death induced by either SP/NK1R or IGF1R as NR4A1-mediated vesicular cell death.
NR4A1- mediated vesicular cell death has autophagic features
Since both SP/NK1R- and IGF1R-induced cell death feature vesicles accumulation, the mechanism to form those vesicles could potentially involve the autophagy core machinery. Although in original studies of these cell death paradigms, double-membrane vesicles (indicative of autophagosomes) were not detected [18], [27], it has now become clear that their occurrence during autophagy is transient. Therefore, their presence may have been missed in those studies, as were performed 24 hr after cell death induction. We repeated the ultrastructural analysis at shorter times, and cells with vesicles containing cytoplasmic componentes 12 h after cell death activation by either SP/NK1R or IGF1R were found (Figure 2A upper panel). Also, some structures resembling autophagosomes about to be closed were observed (Figure 2A lower panel).
The basic molecular machinery for the formation of autophagic vesicles involves three functional complexes: 1) the cycling system of Atg9; 2) the PI3K-III complex; and 3) ubiquitin–like systems Atg12-Atg5 and LC3-PE (phosphatidylethanolamine) called LC3-II. This latter conjugation allows a tight association of LC3-II with membranes [34]. In a steady state LC3-I resides in the cytoplasm, but upon autophagy induction it is processed into LC3-II form and translocates to phagophores. In mammals, the processing and re-distribution of LC3-II into the autophagosomes has been used as a marker for autophagosomes and autophagic activity [35].
To further confirm whether the vesicles are derived from autophagosomes, endogenous LC3 was observed by immunoelectron microscopy. Examples of LC3 decorated vesicles are shown in Figure 2B (observe black dots marked by arrows). Also, cells were transfected with a GFP-LC3 fusion protein to follow LC3 localization. As shown in Figure 2C–D, upon cell death induction, approximately 30% of the cells showed GFP-LC3 redistributed into punctuate bodies in both models of cell death. Since punctuated GFP-LC3 was present only in 5% of control cells, the higher incidence of re-distribution observed in NR4A1-mediated vesicular cell death is not an artifact due to GFP-LC3 over-expression. Accordingly, an increase of the processed LC3-II form was detected by Western blot (Figure 2E). Notably, the level of LC3-II increased further in the presence of chloroquine, a lysosomotropic agent that prevents acidification, which leads to inhibition of both fusion of autophagosome with lysosome and lysosomal acidification, with a consequent stop of the autophagic flux. Taken together, these observations indicated that there is an increment in the level of autophagy during NR4A1-mediated vesicular cell death.
One of the main negative regulators of autophagy is the kinase mTOR, an integrator of signals coming from growth factors, nutrients availability, and energetic balance [36]. mTOR is activated by the PI3K-I/Akt pathway, and therefore potentially activated by the expression of IGF1R. Nevertheless, this signaling should not occur to allow the observed increase in autophagy. Indeed, during IGF1R-induced cell death there was no increase of mTOR activity, as indicated by the steady state level of phosphorylation of its substrate, p70 S6K (Figure 2F). Therefore, the signaling pathway activated by IGF1R to induce this form of vesicular cell death prevents the activation of the classical pro-survival pathway.
NR4A1- mediated vesicular cell death requires the autophagic core machinery
In order to determine whether the observed increase in autophagy was necessary to promote cell death, we blocked members of the core complex PI3K-III/Beclin1 either pharmacologically or by RNAi. As shown in Figure 3A, in the presence of the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 there was a reduction of cell death induced by either NK1R/SP or IGF1R by 70%. Since LY294002 inhibits several classes of PI3K, specific activity of PI3K-III was downregulated by RNAi. Again, both NK1R/SP- and IGF1R- induced cell death was reduced when cells were transfected with siRNA targeting PI3K-III, but not by one targeting an irrelevant gene (GAPDH) (Figure 3B–C). Interestingly, NR4A1 expression occurs upstream of autophagy induction, as NR4A1 expression was not prevented by the autophagy inhibitor LY294002 (Figure 3D). We propose that NR4A1 could modulate autophagy, perhaps converting it into a detrimental process. To further confirm the dependence on autophagy for cell death, we knocked-down by RNAi two other autophagic genes, Beclin 1 and Atg7, and found that it also reduced NK1R/SP- or IGF1R-induced cell death (Figure 4). In every case four different targets for siRNA were tested. Spautin-1 is a potent small molecule inhibitor of autophagy, which promotes degradation of PI3K-III and Beclin 1 [37]. To assess whether inhibition of autophagy would only delay cell death, or truly prevent it, we evaluated in both models of NR4A1-mediated vesicular cell death the effect of Spautin-1. We quantified the number of dead cells that detach from the plate and the clonogenic growth potential of the remaining alive cells. As shown in Figure 5A, the presence of Spautin-1 reduced the number of dead cells in both paradigms, measured after 24 hr of cell death induction, while the number of healthy attached cells increased (Figure 5B). To assess the clonogenic growth of the surviving cells, equal number of cells from each condition was seeded and the number of colonies containing more than 20 cells after further 2–5 days was scored. We found that upon Spautin-1 treatment, the number of colonies doubled in both models of cell death; the results are shown in Figure 5C expressed as the surviving fraction with respect to control cells (details in methods section). Spautin-1 promoted the degradation of both Beclin 1 and PI3K-III, accordingly to the reported effect [37]. Interestingly, Beclin 1 expression seemed to be recovered after 24 hr (Figure 5D), and yet cell death was prevented.
Therefore, not only there is an increase in autophagy, but it is also necessary for the progression of cell death, indicating that both NK1R/SP and IGF1R activate a signaling pathway that induces NR4A1 expression and leads to cell death by autophagy.
NR4A1 mediates autophagic cell death induced by caspase inhibition
Lenardo and collaborators described a form of autophagic cell death in mouse L929 cells activated by inhibition of caspases [17]. We investigated whether NR4A1 activity was necessary for this proved paradigm of cell death by autophagy. As shown in Figure 6, the expression of either of the two NR4A1 dominant negative mutants that inhibited NK1R/SP- or IGF1R-induced cell death, also did reduce this model of cell death. Therefore, NR4A1 activity is necessary for cell death dependent on autophagy induced by at least three different stimuli.
NR4A1 acts as a transcription activator during cell death by autophagy
NR4A1 can induce apoptotic cell death by at least two different mechanisms: transcriptional and non-transcriptional. Expression of a mutant lacking the DNA binding domain (NR4A1ΔDBD, which is located in the cytoplasm) inhibits the transcriptional mechanism, while it is unable to inhibit cell death in a second, contrasting mechanism, where NR4A1 is transported outside the nucleus and translocated to the mitochondria; in this latter case NR4A1 is transcriptionally inactive, as it does not activate a reporter gene [31]. In contrast, another mutant lacking the trans-activating domain (NR4A1ΔN152, which is located in the nucleus) is able to inhibit mitochondrial targeting of NR4A1 and cell death [31]. Since both mutants inhibited both SP/NK1R- and IGF1R-induced death, the mechanism NR4A1 follows to trigger cell death by autophagy could involve either a nuclear or a cytoplasmic function. We investigated the subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of NR4A1 in these cell death paradigms. By immunolocalization, we detected NR4A1 mainly in the nucleus (Figure 7A, B). Although 14% of the cells showed cytoplasmic NR4A1, it did not co-localize with mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum (data not shown), unlike what has been observed during apoptosis [31], [32]. NR4A1 can bind to two different response elements: NuRE, where it binds as a homodimer or heterodimer; and NBRE, where it binds as a monomer. Using a luciferase reporter containing either NuRE or NBRE, we observed NR4A1 transcription activity 6 hr after cell death activation, with a stronger response of NuRE (Figure 7C). This finding suggests the possibility that NR4A1 mediates cell death by autophagy at least in part by acting as a dimeric transcription factor. On the other hand, it has been shown that NR4A1 has the ability to interact with the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2, which interacts with Beclin-1 and prevents autophagy [38]. We tested, then, whether NR4A1 could interact with Beclin-1 complex to promote autophagy. As shown in Figure 7D, it was not the case. Interestingly, NR4A1 interacts instead with the tumor suppressor p53, a protein able to induce autophagy by several mechanisms, including the transcription of target genes like AMPK [39] or DRAM [40], among other mechanisms. We found that neither AMPK nor DRAM increased during NK1R/SP induced death (data not shown).
Discussion
In this report we show that two evolutionarily different receptors, NK1R—belonging to the G-protein coupled receptor family—and IGF1R—a tyrosine kinase receptor—both induce cell death by autophagy, as proteins essential for the autophagic core machinery were required. Inhibition of the NR4A1 activity by the expression of dominant negative mutants also prevented another form of cell death by autophagy, induced by caspases inhibition in L929 cells. Since NR4A1 can heterodimerize with the other members of the family Nor1 and Nurr1, the dominant negative mutants used in this study can potentially inactivate them as well. Nevertheless, we found no expression of Nor1 (data not shown), and although Nurr1 mRNA was detected in a microarray cDNA hybridization analysis, its specific knockdown is necessary to determine whether Nurr1 also has an active role in promoting this type of cell death. We focus on NR4A1 in particular because: 1) the known functions of Nurr1 does not support a pro-autophagic cell death activity; 2) when NR4A1 activity was specifically inhibited by RNAi, cell death induced by NK1R/SP was impaired; 3) NR4A1 is activated during LPS-activated macrophage death, which is a caspase-independent [4], but autophagy-dependent death program [41].
On the other hand, we observed NR4A1 activity is not necessary for necroptosis (data not shown), a different form of non-apoptotic cell death that displays autophagic features, but which is independent of the autophagic core machinery [42]. Therefore, NR4A1 can modulate either apoptosis or cell death by autophagy, but not other forms of cell death independent of caspases and autophagy. Considering our data and literature all together, we propose that NR4A1 is a common mediator of cell death by autophagy.
Autophagy is a catabolic process that helps to maintain the cells' health. But when autophagy is sustained or inappropriately induced it may kill the cell by an unknown mechanism. Specific proteins may be preferentially targeted for autophagic degradation [43] or mitochondrial fission could be increased to stimulate excessive mitophagy [44]. This suggests the possibility of a selective degradation of regulatory molecules or organelles that are essential for survival. Alternatively, a loss of lysosomal integrity associated with an impairment of the autophagic flux could switch autophagy into a detrimental process [45]. Therefore, molecules that modulate either mitochondrial dynamics, the specificity of the cargo, or lysosomal permeability, could potentially transform the pro-survival effect of autophagy into a pro-death effect. It will be interesting to study whether NR4A1 is one of such molecules, and whether either of these mechanisms occurs. The increment in LC3-II we observed in this study (Figure 2E) might reflect a combination of an induction of autophagy with an inhibition of the autophagic flux, since there was not a substantial difference in the amount of LC3-II with chloroquine alone than with chloroquine plus cell death inducers. Nevertheless, we do not rule out that autophagy can still be induced, because there was a huge increase in the level of LC3-II with chloroquine, compared with cell death inducers. This latter observation suggests that a significant amount of LC3-II is being degraded during NR4A1-mediated cell death.
Unlike in some other paradigms of autophagic cell death, the pathway of cell death that we describe here occurs in cells competent to undergo apoptosis, as shown in previous studies [18], [27]. This is not unprecedented, however, since cell death by autophagy in apoptosis competent cells has also been observed elsewhere, like in astrocytes under hypoxic conditions and in MEFs, mediated by apoL1, a BH3-only pro-death protein [46]. Interestingly, it has recently been demonstrated that the high mortality associated to influenza infection by H5N5 is due to its ability to induced autophagic cell death in lung cells in vivo, in wild type and therefore apoptotic competent mice [47].
NR4A1 is a multifunctional protein with the ability to modulate proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Here we show that NR4A1 can, in addition, promote cell death by autophagy. How NR4A1 can mediate alternative forms of cell death under different conditions deserves further investigation. NR4A1 seems to be a mediator of programmed cell death, bridging apoptotic and non-apoptotic pathways. The previously demonstrated interplay between apoptosis and autophagy [15] is compatible with the notion that NR4A1 may be pivotal in these two pathways. Bcl-2 interacts with Beclin 1 through their BH3 domains, preventing autophagy [38]. Since NR4A1 is able to interact with Bcl-2, perhaps NR4A1 may displace Bcl-2, releasing Beclin 1 to promote autophagy. We determined here that NR4A1 did not interact with Beclin 1, although Beclin 1 was necessary for cell death.
NR4A1 activity sometimes depends on its nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation. It can function as a transcriptional regulator or as a protein interactor in cytoplasmic compartments [31], [32] where it modulates the function of Bcl2 family members [33]. In colon cancer cells in response to the short chain fatty acid anion butyrate, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac, or the chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil, NR4A1 induces apoptosis by nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation but without direct mitochondrial targeting, although Bax is redistributed to mitochondria and induces cytochrome c release [48]. In the case of SP/NK1R-induced death, we found that NR4A1 is translocated to the cytoplasm, although it is also retained in the nucleus and remains transcriptionally competent. This finding, together with the ability of the dominant negative mutant NR4A1ΔDBD to prevent the three paradigms of cell death by autophagy, suggests that NR4A1 may effects the switch from protective to destructive autophagy by transcribing pro-autophagic genes, and may also interact with some of the resultant proteins to mediate its non-transcriptional effects. Specific target genes are currently under investigation and further experiments are needed to test this hypothesis. Autophagy has a contrasting role in carcinogenesis. On one hand positive regulators of autophagy are tumor suppressors. 45–75% of cases of human prostate, breast and ovarian cancers present monoallelic mutations of the Beclin-1 gene. On the other hand, certain autophagy inhibitors also confer tumor suppression, perhaps because autophagy removes damaged organelles, growth factors or drugs, thus functioning as a cytoprotective mechanism for cancer cells. Interestingly, NR4A1 has contrasting roles in cancer as well. On one hand, NR4A1 induces cell death; on the other hand, NR4A1 silencing induces apoptosis in several cancer lines [49]. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis of cell death mediation by NR4A1, and its ability to modulate both apoptotic and autophagy-dependent cell death, should provide novel insights and targets for therapeutic intervention.
Dysfunctions of autophagy are involved in several pathologies besides neurodegeneration and cancer, like liver and muscle disorders, or pathogen invasion. Therefore, understanding its molecular regulation has a wider potential impact on medicine.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture, plasmids transfection and cell death evaluation
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were grown in high glucose DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and penicillin/streptomycin 100 U/ml (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cultures were incubated at 37°C in 95% air and 5% carbon dioxide with 95% humidity. Transient transfection was performed by calcium phosphate/DNA co-precipitation. Briefly, 2×105 cells/well were seeded into 35 mm wells 16 hr prior to transfection. Transfection solution: 5 µg of DNA with 250 mM CaCl2 in 50 µl were incubated 10 minutes at room temperature. Then 50 µl of 2X HEPES Buffer Saline (HBS: 230 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4, 12 mM Dextrose, 50 mM HEPES, pH 6.95) were added and incubated 2 min. at 37°C. Transfection solution was left during 12–15 hours. After 24 hr, 100 nM SP (SIGMA) was added when necessary. Expression of each construct in the transient transfections was determined by Western blot or immunofluorescence. The plasmids pcDNA3.1-NK1R and pcDNA3.1-IGF1R-IC have already been described [18], [27]. Dr. Noboru Mizushima (Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan) kindly shared the pCAG-GFP-LC3 construct and Dr. Jacques Drouin (Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Canada) kindly provided POMC-Luc; NBRE-POMC-Luc and NuRE-POMC-Luc reporter plasmids. Transient transfection efficiencies were in all cases >80%. Cell death was determined by trypan blue exclusion. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (Calbiochem #440202, Los Angeles, CA, USA) was used at 5 µM. Autophagy inhibtor Spautin-1 (Cellagen Technology, San Diego, CA, USA) was used at 10 µM. The software PRISM 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for the one way ANOVA statistical analysis, and the p values between indicated treatments in each figure were calculated by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test.
To assess clonogenic ability, cells were treated as described above for cell death evaluation and re-plated after 24 hr. Equal number of cells was taken from each treatment and seeded 100 up to 104 cells per well (6 well plates) for 2–5 days to allow colonies to form; cells were washed with PBS, fixed and stained with a mixture of 6% glutaraldehyde and 0.5% crystal violet over night, rinsed with tap water and dried at room temperature. Colonies with more than 20 cells were counted. The plating efficiency (PE) was calculated for control cells as the ratio of the number of colonies to the number of cells seeded. The surviving fraction (SF) is the number of colonies that arise after treatment of cells, expressed in terms of PE: SF = no. of colonies formed after treatment/(no. of cells seeded X PE) [50].
Murine L929 cells (kindly provided by Dr. Alejandro Zentella at Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Mexico) [51] were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogene, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, 3.5×105 cells/well were seeded into 35 mm wells 24 hr before transfection. For each well, 4 µg DNA: 12 µl Lipofectamine ratio was used. The percentage of cells with punctuated LC3-GFP out of 100 GFP expressing cells from each condition in each experiment were calculated. Cells were not fixed. Fluorescent cells were detected using either a Nikon Eclipse TE300 fluorescence microscope, or an Axiovert 200M (Carl Zeiss) confocal microscope.
Electron Microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy
Cell pellets were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 hr at room temperature; then it was washed two times (10 min each) in PBS and stained with 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1 hr at 4°C, followed by two washes with PBS and water. Total dehydration was made in ethanol (graded 50–100%) and propylene oxide. Pellets were embedded in epoxy resin and cut into 70 nm sections. For immunoelectron microscopy, cell pellets were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde for 30 min at 4°C. After ethanol dehydration (graded 70–100%) pellets without osmication were embedded in LR White. Ultra-thin sections were mounted on nickel grids, blocked with 5% fat free Milk in TBST for 15 min and probed with a 1∶10 dilution of anti LC3 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) at 4°C over night. A 1∶10 dilution of colloidal gold-conjugated secondary antibody (GAR Auroprobe, Amersham) was incubated for 2 hr at room temperature. Then sections were washed with TBST and PBS, post-fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, thoroughly washed and stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate. A control without first antibody was included. Electron microscopy was performed at 80 kV on a Zeiss EM900 Transmission Electron Microscope. Images were recorded with a Gatan Dual Vision CCD 300W camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA).
Western blot and immunofluorescence analysis
For Western, the transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells were washed with cold PBS and homogenized in lysis buffer (150 µM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 50 µM Tris HCl pH 8.0, proteinase inhibitors cocktail (Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, USA)). Cytoplasmic extracts were collected after a 10 min. centrifugation at 14,000 rcf. Protein was quantified by Bradford assay and electrophoresis of equal amounts of total protein was performed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes at 4°C. Membranes were probed with a 1∶1000 dilution of anti-LC3 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); 1∶8000 dilution of anti-GAPDH (Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ, USA); 1∶500 dilution of anti-PI3K-III (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); 1∶1000 dilution of anti-Beclin 1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); 1∶1000 dilution of anti-Atg7, anti phospho-p70 S6K (Thr389) and anti p53 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA); 1∶7000 dilution of anti-tubulin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated in the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody for 1 hr followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Alternatively, appropriate infrared dye-coupled secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit IRDye800 and anti-mouse IRDye700, Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA, USA) were used and the blots were scanned in an Odyssey Imager (LI-CORE Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). A 6xHis tagged NR4A1 protein was purified by NiNTA affinity column following provider instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted to detect Beclin-1 or p53 co-purification. For immunofluorescence, cells were seeded into Lab-Tek CC2 treated slide chambers (Nalgene Nunc International, Napeville, IL, USA); after washing with PBS cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 10 min; then washed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 min. Afterwards cells were washed with PBS, pre-incubated 30 min. with 4% BSA/PBS and 4% serum goat and washed again with PBS. Anti-NR4A1 (M-210 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) was diluted 1∶200 in 2%BSA/PBS and incubated over night at 4°C. After washing with PBS cells were incubated with anti-rabbit coupled to Alexafluor 594 (Invitrogene, Carlsbad, CA) diluted 1∶1000 in 2%BSA/PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Then, cells were treated with 10 µg/ml RNAse for 30 min at 37°C and washed again with PBS. Cells were counterstained with 10 ng/ml Sytox Green (Invitrogene, Carlsbad, CA) and mounted for microscope observation on an Axiovert 200M (Carl Zeiss) confocal microscope.
RNAi
Two non-overlapping regions (776–794 and 1150–1168 positions in GenBank NM_002647) were targeted for PI3K-III down regulation, and the corresponding siRNAs were simultaneously transfected. These siRNAs were generated by in vitro transcription using the Silencer siRNA Construction Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. siRNA targeting GAPDH was synthesized using the oligonucleotides provided by the kit. In addition, a siRNA control sequence was synthesized targeting the region 153–173 of firefly luciferase gene from the plasmid pGL2-control (GenBank X65324). siRNAs for down regulation of Beclin-1 and Atg7 were purchased as SMARTpool from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA).
siRNA transfection: Human embryonic kidney 293 cells (105 cells per well in 12-well plates) were grown in high glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), with no antibiotics for 16 hr. The siRNA specific for each target gene was transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogene, Carsband, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, using 3 µg siRNA: 6 µl Lipofectamine 2000 ratio. After 4 hr of incubation, plasmids were transfected. To estimate the efficiency of the transfection the siRNAs for luciferase (as a sequence irrelevant for the mammalian genome) was chemically synthesized and fluorescently labeled with FITC (Xeragon-Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).
Transcription Assays
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were seeded in 12-well plates (1.5×105 cells/well). Transient transfections were performed by calcium phosphate/DNA co-precipitation of 1 µg of NK1R; 1 µg of reporter plasmid (either POMC minimal promoter-Luciferase (lacks responsive elements); NBRE-Luciferase or NurRe-Luciferase); and 200 ng of pCH110 (encoding lac Z) to normalize transfections. Twenty four hours after transfection the cells were incubated or not with 100 nM SP for 5 h. Luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were determined using the Dual Ligth System (Applied Biosystems), according to manufacturer's instructions, and a Monoligth 2010 (Analytical Luminescence Laboratory) luminometer.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Ms. Minerva Carcaño for her secretarial assistance and M.C. Concepción Valencia for her technical assistance. We acknowledge the efficient technical support from Dr. Rosana Sánchez and Dr. Guadalupe Zavala from the Electron Microscopy Unit. We are thankful to Carola Stoschek and Dr. Zoltán Konthur (In-vitro Ligand Screening Lab, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany) for technical assistance and providing reagents to purify His-tagged NR4A1. From the Buck Institute for Age Research in Novato, California, USA, we are thankful to Dr. David Madden for sharing the PI3K-III target region for siRNA synthesis, Ms. Karen Poksay who performed an LC3 processing Western blot, and Dr. Dale E. Bredesen, for his thoughtful discussion and reading of a draft of this manuscript.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología) grants PQ46174 and P106598 to SCO; PAPIIT-UNAM (Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Inovación Tecnológica - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) grant IN221909 to SCO; and ICGEB (International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology www.icgeb.org) grant MEX06/03 to SCO. JBR and XG were undergraduate students supported by CONACyT PQ46174; GZG and DAR received fellowship for Master studies from CONACyT (255401 and 48006 respectively). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Wingate AD, Arthur JS (2006) Post-translational control of Nur77. Biochem Soc Trans 34: 1107–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wu Q, Liu S, Ye XF, Huang ZW, Su WJ (2002) Dual roles of Nur77 in selective regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle by TPA and ATRA in gastric cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 23: 1583–1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Winoto A, Littman DR (2002) Nuclear hormone receptors in T lymphocytes. Cell 109 Suppl: S57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kim SO, Ono K, Tobias PS, Han J (2003) Orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 is involved in caspase-independent macrophage cell death. J Exp Med 197: 1441–1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Liu W, Youn HD, Liu JO (2001) Thapsigargin-induced apoptosis involves Cabin1-MEF2-mediated induction of Nur77. Eur J Immunol 31: 1757–1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bras A, Albar JP, Leonardo E, de Buitrago GG, Martinez AC (2000) Ceramide-induced cell death is independent of the Fas/Fas ligand pathway and is prevented by Nur77 overexpression in A20 B cells. Cell Death Differ 7: 262–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Suzuki S, Suzuki N, Mirtsos C, Horacek T, Lye E, et al. (2003) Nur77 as a survival factor in tumor necrosis factor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 8276–8280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Schweichel JU, Merker HJ (1973) The morphology of various types of cell death in prenatal tissues. Teratology 7: 253–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Clarke PG (1990) Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms. Anat Embryol 181: 195–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bredesen DE (2007) Key note lecture: toward a mechanistic taxonomy for cell death programs. Stroke 38: 652–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Honarpour N, Du C, Richardson JA, Hammer RE, Wang X, et al. (2000) Adult Apaf-1-deficient mice exhibit male infertility. Dev Biol 218: 248–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Blum ES, Abraham MC, Yoshimura S, Lu Y, Shaham S (2012) Control of nonapoptotic developmental cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans by a polyglutamine-repeat protein. Science 335: 970–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Berry DL, Baehrecke EH (2007) Growth arrest and autophagy are required for salivary gland cell degradation in Drosophila. Cell 131: 1137–1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Denton D, Shravage B, Simin R, Mills K, Berry DL, et al. (2009) Autophagy, not apoptosis, is essential for midgut cell death in Drosophila. Curr Biol 19: 1741–1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ (2008) Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 451: 1069–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, Murata S, Iwata J, et al. (2006) Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 441: 880–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yu L, Alva A, Su H, Dutt P, Freundt E, et al. (2004) Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science 304: 1500–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Castro-Obregon S, Del Rio G, Chen SF, Swanson RA, Frankowski H, et al. (2002) A ligand-receptor pair that triggers a non-apoptotic form of programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ 9: 807–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Quartara L, Maggi CA (1998) The tachykinin NK1 receptor. Part II: Distribution and pathophysiological roles. Neuropeptides 32: 1–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Castro-Obregon S, Rao RV, del Rio G, Chen SF, Poksay KS, et al. (2004) Alternative, nonapoptotic programmed cell death: mediation by arrestin 2, ERK2, and Nur77. J Biol Chem 279: 17543–17553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Slagsvold HH, Ostvold AC, Fallgren AB, Paulsen RE (2002) Nuclear receptor and apoptosis initiator NGFI-B is a substrate for kinase ERK2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291: 1146–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Honkaniemi J, Sharp FR (1999) Prolonged expression of zinc finger immediate-early gene mRNAs and decreased protein synthesis following kainic acid induced seizures. Eur J Neurosci 11: 10–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Walton M, Connor B, Lawlor P, Young D, Sirimanne E, et al. (1999) Neuronal death and survival in two models of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 29: 137–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Liu H, Cao Y, Basbaum AI, Mazarati AM, Sankar R, et al. (1999) Resistance to excitotoxin-induced seizures and neuronal death in mice lacking the preprotachykinin A gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 12096–12101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yu Z, Cheng G, Huang X, Li K, Cao X (1997) Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist SR140333: a novel type of drug to treat cerebral ischemia. Neuroreport 8: 2117–2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zachrisson O, Lindefors N, Brene S (1998) A tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist, CP-122,721-1, attenuates kainic acid-induced seizure activity. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 60: 291–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sperandio S, de Belle I, Bredesen DE (2000) An alternative, non-apoptotic form of programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 14376–14381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sperandio S, Poksay K, de Belle I, Lafuente MJ, Liu B, et al. (2004) Paraptosis: mediation by MAP kinases and inhibition by AIP-1/Alix. Cell Death Differ 11: 1066–1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Puglielli L (2008) Aging of the brain, neurotrophin signaling, and Alzheimer's disease: is IGF1-R the common culprit? Neurobiol Aging 29: 795–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sui X, Jin L, Huang X, Geng S, He C, et al. (2011) p53 signaling and autophagy in cancer: a revolutionary strategy could be developed for cancer treatment. Autophagy 7: 565–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li H, Kolluri SK, Gu J, Dawson MI, Cao X, et al. (2000) Cytochrome c release and apoptosis induced by mitochondrial targeting of nuclear orphan receptor TR3. Science 289: 1159–1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Liang B, Song X, Liu G, Li R, Xie J, et al. (2007) Involvement of TR3/Nur77 translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum in ER stress-induced apoptosis. Exp Cell Res 313: 2833–2844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lin B, Kolluri SK, Lin F, Liu W, Han YH, et al. (2004) Conversion of Bcl-2 from protector to killer by interaction with nuclear orphan receptor Nur77/TR3. Cell 116: 527–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gozuacik D, Kimchi A (2007) Autophagy and cell death. Curr Top Dev Biol 78: 217–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B (2010) Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 140: 313–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM (2011) mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 21–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu J, Xia H, Kim M, Xu L, Li Y, et al. (2011) Beclin1 controls the levels of p53 by regulating the deubiquitination activity of USP10 and USP13. Cell 147: 223–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Maiuri MC, Le Toumelin G, Criollo A, Rain JC, Gautier F, et al. (2007) Functional and physical interaction between Bcl-X(L) and a BH3-like domain in Beclin-1. Embo J 26: 2527–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Feng Z, Hu W, de Stanchina E, Teresky AK, Jin S, et al. (2007) The regulation of AMPK beta1, TSC2, and PTEN expression by p53: stress, cell and tissue specificity, and the role of these gene products in modulating the IGF-1-AKT-mTOR pathways. Cancer Res 67: 3043–3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Crighton D, Wilkinson S, O'Prey J, Syed N, Smith P, et al. (2006) DRAM, a p53-induced modulator of autophagy, is critical for apoptosis. Cell 126: 121–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Xu Y, Kim SO, Li Y, Han J (2006) Autophagy contributes to caspase-independent macrophage cell death. J Biol Chem 281: 19179–19187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Christofferson DE, Yuan J (2010) Necroptosis as an alternative form of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 263–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yu L, Wan F, Dutta S, Welsh S, Liu Z, et al. (2006) Autophagic programmed cell death by selective catalase degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 4952–4957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Gomes LC, Di Benedetto G, Scorrano L (2011) During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat Cell Biol 13: 589–598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gonzalez P, Mader I, Tchoghandjian A, Enzenmuller S, Cristofanon S, et al. (2012) Impairment of lysosomal integrity by B10, a glycosylated derivative of betulinic acid, leads to lysosomal cell death and converts autophagy into a detrimental process. Cell Death Differ 19: 1337–1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wan G, Zhaorigetu S, Liu Z, Kaini R, Jiang Z, et al. (2008) Apolipoprotein l1, a novel BH3-only lipid binding protein, induces autophagic cell death. J Biol Chem [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sun Y, Li C, Shu Y, Ju X, Zou Z, et al. (2012) Inhibition of Autophagy Ameliorates Acute Lung Injury Caused by Avian Influenza A H5N1 Infection. Sci Signal 5: ra16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wilson AJ, Arango D, Mariadason JM, Heerdt BG, Augenlicht LH (2003) TR3/Nur77 in colon cancer cell apoptosis. Cancer Res 63: 5401–5407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li QX, Ke N, Sundaram R, Wong-Staal F (2006) NR4A1, 2, 3–an orphan nuclear hormone receptor family involved in cell apoptosis and carcinogenesis. Histol Histopathol 21: 533–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C (2006) Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc 1: 2315–2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gomez EO, Mendoza-Milla C, Ibarra-Sanchez MJ, Ventura-Gallegos JL, Zentella A (1996) Ceramide reproduces late appearance of oxidative stress during TNF-mediated cell death in L929 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 228: 505–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]