Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1982 Aug;79(16):5006–5010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.16.5006

Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon

Jeffrey D Palmer *, Daniel Zamir †,‡
PMCID: PMC346815  PMID: 16593219

Abstract

Chloroplast DNA was purified from 12 accessions that represent most of the species diversity in the genus Lycopersicon (family Solanaceae) and from 3 closely related species in the genus Solanum. Fragment patterns produced by digestion of these DNAs with 25 different restriction endonucleases were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. In all 15 DNAs, a total of only 39 restriction site mutations were detected among 484 restriction sites surveyed, representing 2,800 base pairs of sequence information. This low rate of base sequence change is paralleled by an extremely low rate of convergent change in restriction sites; only 1 of the 39 mutations appears to have occurred independently in two different lineages. Parsimony analysis of shared mutations has allowed the construction of a maternal phylogeny for the 15 accessions. This phylogeny is generally consistent with relationships based on morphology and crossability but provides more detailed resolution at several places. All accessions within Lycopersicon form a coherent group, with two of the three species of Solanum as outside reference points. Chloroplast DNA analysis places S. pennellii firmly within Lycopersicon, confirming recent studies that have removed it from Solanum. Red-orange fruit color is shown to be a monophyletic trait in three species of Lycopersicon, including the cultivated tomato, L. esculentum. Analysis of six accessions within L. peruvianum reveals a limited amount of intraspecific polymorphism which, however, encompasses all the variation observed in L. chilense and L. chmielewskii. It is suggested that these latter two accessions be relegated to positions within the L. peruvianum complex.

Keywords: restriction endonucleases, slow rate of evolution, chloroplast DNA phylogeny, intraspecific variation, red fruit color

Full text

PDF
5006

Images in this article

5007Image
on p.5007
5009Image
on p.5009

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avise J. C., Giblin-Davidson C., Laerm J., Patton J. C., Lansman R. A. Mitochondrial DNA clones and matriarchal phylogeny within and among geographic populations of the pocket gopher, Geomys pinetis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6694–6698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avise J. C., Lansman R. A., Shade R. O. The use of restriction endonucleases to measure mitochondrial DNA sequence relatedness in natural populations. I. Population structure and evolution in the genus Peromyscus. Genetics. 1979 May;92(1):279–295. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.1.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bovenberg W. A., Kool A. J., Nijkamp H. J. Isolation, characterization and restriction endonuclease mapping of the Petunia hybrida chloroplast DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Feb 11;9(3):503–517. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.3.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown G. G., Simpson M. V. Intra- and interspecific variation of the mitochondrial genome in Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus: restriction enzyme analysis of variant mitochondrial DNA molecules and their evolutionary relationships. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):125–143. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W. M., George M., Jr, Wilson A. C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1967–1971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown W. M. Polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA of humans as revealed by restriction endonuclease analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3605–3609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cherty L. M., Case S. M., Wilson A. C. Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1978 Apr 14;200(4338):209–211. doi: 10.1126/science.635583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferris S. D., Wilson A. C., Brown W. M. Evolutionary tree for apes and humans based on cleavage maps of mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Apr;78(4):2432–2436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.4.2432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fluhr R., Edelman M. Conservation of sequence arrangement among higher plant chloroplast DNAs: molecular cross hybridization among the Solanaceae and between Nicotiana and Spinacia. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 21;9(24):6841–6853. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.24.6841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lamppa G. K., Bendich A. J. Chloroplast DNA Sequence Homologies among Vascular Plants. Plant Physiol. 1979 Apr;63(4):660–668. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.4.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palmer J. D. Physical and gene mapping of chloroplast DNA from Atriplex triangularis and Cucumis sativa. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Mar 11;10(5):1593–1605. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.5.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palmer J. D., Thompson W. F. Chloroplast DNA rearrangements are more frequent when a large inverted repeat sequence is lost. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):537–550. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90170-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sears B. B. Elimination of plastids during spermatogenesis and fertilization in the plant kingdom. Plasmid. 1980 Nov;4(3):233–255. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(80)90063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas J. R., Tewari K. K. Conservation of 70S ribosomal RNA genes in the chloroplast DNAs of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3147–3151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Timothy D. H., Levings C. S., Pring D. R., Conde M. F., Kermicle J. L. Organelle DNA variation and systematic relationships in the genus Zea: Teosinte. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4220–4224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wildman S. G. Aspects of fraction 1 protein evolution. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Sep;196(2):598–610. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(79)90313-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson A. C., Carlson S. S., White T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:573–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES