Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2012 Nov 9;2:828. doi: 10.1038/srep00828

A Novel Tumor suppressor network in squamous malignancies

Clotilde Costa 1, Mirentxu Santos 1, Carmen Segrelles 1, Marta Dueñas 1, M Fernanda Lara 1,3, Xabier Agirre 2, Felipe Prosper 2, Ramón García-Escudero 1, Jesús M Paramio 1,a
PMCID: PMC3494016  PMID: 23145321

Abstract

The specific ablation of Rb1 gene in stratified epithelia (RbF/F;K14cre) promotes proliferation and altered differentiation but is insufficient to produce spontaneous tumors. The pRb relative, p107, compensates some of the functions of pRb in these tissues; however, RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice die postnatally. Here we show, using an inducible mouse model (RbF/F;K14creERTM), that p107 exerts specific tumor suppressor functions in the absence of pRb in stratified epithelia. The simultaneous absence of pRb and p107 produces impaired p53 transcriptional functions and reduction of Pten expression, allowing spontaneous squamous carcinoma development. These tumors display significant overlap with human squamous carcinomas, supporting that RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice might constitute a new model for these malignancies. Remarkably tumor development in vivo is partially alleviated by mTOR inhibition. These data demonstrate the existence of a previously unreported functional connection between pRb, Pten and p53 tumor suppressors, through p107, of a particular relevance in squamous tumor development.

The Rb1 gene product, the pRb protein, exerts essential roles controlling cell cycle progression, differentiation and apoptosis1. Accordingly, it plays tumor suppressor functions in multiple tissues, and the disruption of the ‘Rb pathway', either by direct Rb1 gene mutation or, more frequently, via alterations affecting pRb biological functions, is a hallmark of most sporadic human cancers2. To analyze Rb1 roles in vivo in adult mice, several tissue specific knock outs have been generated, as mouse models bearing complete Rb1 gene loss displayed embryonic lethality3,4,5. The constitutive somatic elimination of Rb1 gene in epidermis (RbF/F;K14cre mice) produced altered proliferation and differentiation, but it was insufficient to promote tumor development6. Moreover, upon chemical carcinogenesis protocols, RbF/F;K14cre mice showed reduced tumor incidence and multiplicity as compared to controls. However, the Rb-deficient tumors displayed increased malignancy with high rate of conversion from papillomas to squamous cell carcinomas7. This paradoxical observation was explained by an early and acute p53 induction in benign tumor cells, which promoted a selective pressure leading to premature p53 inactivation and increased malignancy7. The connection between pRb and p53 in this context was further supported by the findings obtained in mice bearing p53 deletion in stratified epithelia (p53F/F;K14cre mice), in which the spontaneous tumor development was accelerated by simultaneous epidermal Rb1 loss8. Remarkably, spontaneous tumors arising in these pRbF/F;p53F/F;K14cre mice are highly aggressive and display early signs of chromosomal instability8,9 and high metastatic behavior associated with deregulated miRNA expression10. Further, genomic profiling of these spontaneous tumors also revealed a significant overlap with multiple human malignancies distinguished by poor prognosis, altered p53 status and, remarkably, high metastasis incidence11.

The absence of spontaneous tumors in RbF/F;K14cre mice might suggest that other proteins exert overlapping and/or compensating functions. This seems to be the case of E2F112 and p10713, but not p13014. The fact that the RbF/F;K14cre phenotype was aggravated in a p107−/− background, leading to early postnatal death6, supports the hypothesis that the pRb relative p107 can exert some of the functions of pRb in its absence in epidermis. Importantly, a number of evidences also suggested a possible tumor suppressor role for p107 in absence of pRb13. First, double deficient keratinocytes are highly sensitive to Ha-ras-mediated transformation and displayed reduced oncogene-induced premature senescence13. Second, transplants of RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− skin, but not RbF/F;K14cre, invariably developed squamous tumors13. And third, the altered behavior of RbF/F;K14cre mice to chemical carcinogenesis is partially alleviated by a reduction of p107 amounts15. These findings could also indicate that the absence of p107 affects p53 functions. Indeed, transcriptome analysis of new born epidermis revealed the downregulation of several p53-dependent genes in RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice13, suggesting the existence of new functional connections between Rb family of proteins and p53 in this tissue16. These gene expression studies showed the underexpression of Pten in RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− new born skin samples. Pten is a tumor suppressor gene, induced by several mechanisms including p53 activation17, which regulates cell survival by PI3K/AKT pathway18. Inactivation of Pten gene is found in multiple tumors including human19 and mouse20 skin cancers.

To explore the possible functional relationship between pRb, p53 and Pten genes in vivo, we have generated a mouse model bearing the inducible Rb1 loss in stratified epithelia in the absence of p107 alleles (RbF/F;K14CreERTM;p107−/−) thus overcoming the early lethality of RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice. Using this model we confirm the specific tumor suppressive roles for p107 in epidermis. RbF/F; K14CreERTM; p107−/− mice develop squamous carcinoma and display impaired p53 transcriptional functions and reduced expression of Pten gene. Further, transcriptome analyses revealed striking similarities between the mouse tumors and human squamous cell carcinomas. Collectively our data support a novel previously unreported connection between pRb, p53 and Pten tumor suppressors of a particular relevance in the genesis of human squamous neoplasias.

Results

Acute pRb loss in the absence of p107 leads to spontaneous tumors development

Compared with control or p107−/− mice (Supp Fig. S1a), the inducible loss of pRb in adult mice epidermis by tamoxifen treatment (RbF/F;K14creERTM mice) produces skin hyperplasia (Supp. Fig. S1b), characterized by expansion of basal keratin 5 (K5)-positive keratinocytes (Supp. Fig. S1e), interfollicular induction of K6 (Supp. Fig. S1h) and increased proliferation (Supp Fig. S1k, m, n), which is undistinguishable from that observed in mice bearing constitutive pRb loss in epidermis (RbF/F;K14cre mice)6. However, it is insufficient to allow spontaneous tumor development over one year and half after pRb loss (n = 25) (Fig. 1n). On the contrary, p107 loss has no phenotypic consequences in epidermis (Fig. 1a; Supp. Fig. S1a)6,14,21. The inducible loss of Rb1 in a p107 null background (RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/−) avoided the early lethality observed in RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice6 and exacerbated the RbF/F; K14creERTM mouse phenotype, as demonstrated by increased hyperplasia (Supp Fig. S1c, o), increased proliferation (Supp Fig. S1l, m, n) and generalized expansion of the suprabasal expression of K5 and K6-expressing keratinocytes (Supp Fig. S1f, j). In addition, the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice display a generalized hair loss and a very frail appearance (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

a,b) Example of gross appearance of the RbF/F;p107−/− (a) and RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− (b) mice 4 months after topical tamoxifen treatment. Macroscopic aspect of face, dewlap, snout and eyelid (c, c',c'' respectively). d–f) H&E stained snout sections of RbF/F;p107−/− (d) RbF/F;K14creERTM (e) and RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− (f) showing massive hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis and epithelial downgrowths in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/−. g, g') Immunofluorescence showing the localization of Laminin in hyperplasic (g) and lesional areas (g') of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse snouts. The reduced expression and disappearance of laminin in lesional areas support the invasive consition of squamous cell carcinomas. h–m) H&E stained sections showing tumor samples of snout (h, i), neck (h'), eyelid (h''), lip (j), palate (k), oral epithelium (l) and ventral tongue (m) of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice 4 months after tamoxifen treatment. n) Kaplan Meier plot showing the incidence of tumours in RbF/F;K14creERTM (open box; n = 25) and RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− (black box; n = 22) mice. p value was obtained by the log rank test. Bars = 150 µm.

Although tamoxifen was topically applied in the lower back-skin area, PCR analysis reveals that Rb1 recombination occurs in untreated areas including untreated skin and oral tissues (Supp Fig. S2a). In spite of the observed recombination, no obvious phenotypic changes were observed between control (Supp Fig. S2c, d, e) and RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice (Supp Fig. S2c', d', e') in stomach (Supp Fig. S2c, c'), esophagus (Supp Fig. S2d, d'), dorsal tongue (Supp Fig. S2e, e'), or other K14 expressing tissues (not shown) by four months after tamoxifen application.

Prior to the degenerative phenotype, RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice show the development of lesions in the cheek (Fig. 1c), neck (Fig. 1c' and Supp Fig. S3a), eyelids and snout (Fig. 1c''), and the overgrowth of nails (Supp Fig. S3b). Histology analyses of snout samples revealed that, compared to controls (Fig. 1d), RbF/F; K14creERTM mice display a moderate hyperplasia and mild hyperkeratosis (Fig. 1e). However, in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice a generalized hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis and downgrowths of epithelial cells suggestive of tumoral or pretumoral lesions were observed (Fig. 1f). Compared to the hyerplasic regions of RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse snouts (Fig. 1g), the lesions showed areas of laminin loss (Fig. 1g') thus confirming that they correspond to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Similar types of tumors were found in all RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− in snout (Fig. 1h), neck (Fig. 1h') and eyelids (Fig. 1h''), in some cases associated to inflammatory processes (Fig. 1i). Histology also evidenced the presence of sporadic tumors affecting lips (Fig. 1j), palate (Fig. 1k), oral epithelia (Fig. 1l) and ventral tongue (Fig. 1m). The study of a cohort of RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mice demonstrates that all mice (n = 22) developed tumors by two months after recombination induction (Fig. 1n). The analysis of pRb and p107 status in these tumors revealed that all of them display loss of p107 and generalized recombination of RbF/F alleles after tamoxifen treatment (data not shown).

Reduced Pten expression and impaired p53-dependent transcription in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice

The phenotype displayed in face, snout, nails and epidermis (Supp Fig. 3a-c) by RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice is similar to that exhibited by mice expressing a constitutive active Akt22,23 and those lacking Rb1 and Pten genes in stratified epithelia (RbF/F;PtenF/F;K14cre mice; Supp Fig. S3a', b', c'). However, the RbF/F;PtenF/F;K14cre mice also display early lethality (Segrelles et al, unpublished data) and all of them died by 1 or 2 months after birth, precluding the analysis of adult mice. Despite this, comparative study of newborn skins from RbF/F;PtenF/F;K14cre and RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mice transplanted onto immunodeficient mice (Supp Fig. S3e-e') revealed the development of massive epidermal outgrowths corresponding to well differentiated squamous cell carcinomas in both cases. Remarkably, the tumors displayed almost identical histopathological characteristics regardless their origin (either RbF/F;PtenF/F;K14cre or RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mouse newborn skin; Supp. Fig. S3f-h').

Tumor development in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice suggested a possible deregulation of p53 functions, as p53 is a major player to suppress tumorigenesis in epidermis in the absence of pRb7,24. In agreement, previous gene expression analyses in RbF/F;K14cre; p107−/− newborn epidermis revealed the downregulation of a number of p53-induced genes, mainly involved in apoptosis13. Among these genes we observed the underexpression of Pten, which in certain tissues is transcriptionally induced by p5317. Consequently, the previous data and the extensive similarities between RbF/F;PtenF/F; K14cre and RbF/F;K14cre;p107−/− mouse phenotypes, prompted us to study possible alterations in p53- and Pten-dependent signaling in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice.

Upon in vitro 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment, primary keratinocytes from RbF/F;K14creERTM and RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice displayed an almost complete recombination of RbF/F alleles (Supp Fig. S2b), but only a partial loss of pRb (Fig. 2a). Nonetheless, this partial loss of pRb promoted the induction of p107 and a moderate increase in p130 (Fig. 2a). In addition, it also induced p53 expression and its bona fide target p21CIP1, which are both further induced in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− keratinocytes (Fig. 2a). Among the other p53-family members, double deficient primary keratinocytes displayed a clear induction of ΔNp63α, without any significant increase in p73 or in ΔNp73. Similarly, RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− keratinocytes displayed increased levels of p53-Ser392 phosphorylated, -Lys373 Acetylated, and -Lys372 methylated (Fig. 2a), which in some cases corresponded to increased expression of the corresponding posttranscriptional effectors Tip60, SetD8 and Smyd2, without significant variations in others such as Sirt1, Pcaf and CBP (Fig. 2a). In spite of the increased levels of p53 and its active forms, luciferase experiments revealed that the p53-depending response was not induced in these double deficient cells (Fig. 2b), but rather decreased when compared to RbF/F;K14creERTM cells. On the contrary, the induction of E2F-responding elements upon pRb reduction was further increased in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− keratinocytes (Fig. 2c). These data indicated that the p53-dependent transcription is impaired in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− keratinocytes.

Figure 2. Molecular alterations in primary keratinocytes of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/−mice.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

a) Western blot analysis of primary keratinocytes of the quoted genotypes with or without 4OHTX treatment showing the expression of the indicated proteins. Actin was used as loading control. b, c) Luciferase activity of p53- (b) and E2F-responding elements (c) in primary keratinocytes of the quoted genotypes. d) Quantitative PCR for the relative expression analysis of Pten gene in epidermal extracts of the quoted genotypes. e) Relative luciferase activity of Pten promoter in primary keratinocytes of the quoted genotypes. Data in b, d, e come from three independent experiments and are shown as mean±S.E.M. Data in d) come from five different extracts normalized to GusB gene expression and are shown as mean±S.E.M.

The RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− keratinocytes also displayed a significant reduction of Pten levels (Fig. 2a) associated to reduced Pten gene expression level, as demonstrated by qRTPCR (Fig. 2d) and by luciferase experiments using Pten gene promoter (Fig. 2e), but not due to promoter methylation dependent events (Supp Fig. S4). The reduction of Pten levels was in parallel with the increased c-jun expression, which represses Pten gene expression independently of p5325, and a concomitant increased phosphorylation of Akt at Thr308 and Ser473 (Fig. 2a). Of note, ΔNp63, which is also specifically induced in double deficient cells (Fig. 2a), has been shown as a potential repressor of Pten gene expression in keratinocytes26.

The comparative analysis of the expression of differentiation markers such as K5, K6, K10 and K15, or the rate of proliferation (analyzed by BrdU incorporation) in controls (Fig. 3a, b, c, d), RbF/F; K14creERTM (Fig. 3a', b', c', d') and RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− (Fig. 3a'', b'', c'', d'') mice suggests that the lesions arising in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice were predominantly well differentiated squamous cell carcinomas similar to those arising upon RbF/F; K14cre;p107−/− skin transplantation experiments (Supp Fig. S3; see also13), with a no evident signs of apoptosis (data not shown). A phosphoproteome analysis comparing skin and tumor protein extracts revealed increased p53 phosphorylation in different residues and overall increase in Akt/mTOR activity, as demonstrated not only by the augmented phosphorylation of Akt (in both Thr308 and Ser473) but also by the phosphorylation of specific Akt substrates such as GSK3β, p27 and p70S6K (Fig. 3e). Immunohistochemistry studies confirmed the increased phosphorylation of Akt (Fig. 3f) and almost no detectable amounts of Pten in tumor samples (Fig. 3f') which is accompanied with reduced Pten gene transcription (Fig. 3g).

Figure 3. Akt pathway is altered in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− tumors.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

a–d'') Double immunofluorescence showing the expression of keratin 5 (red) and keratin 10 (green) (a, a', a''), keratin 6 (red) and keratin 10 (green) (b, b',b''), keratin 15 (red) and keratin 10 (green) (c, c', c''), and keratin 5 (red) and BrdU incorporation (green)(d, d', d'') in RbF/Fp107−/− (a–d), RbF/F;K14creERTM (a'–d') and RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− (a''–d'') snout sections. Bars = 150 μm. e) Phosphoproteome profiles of skin or tumor extracts of the quoted genotypes. At least four independent samples were pooled. f,f') Representative immunohistochemistry showing the expression of phosphorylated (Ser473) Akt (f) and Pten (f') in RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse snout. Bars = 150μm. g) Relative expression of Pten gene in skin and tumor samples; red bars denote mean±S.E.M.

RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− tumors resemblance with human tumors

The histology and biochemical characteristics of the spontaneous tumors of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice are reminiscent of those human squamous carcinomas displaying increased Akt activity. In order to explore this possibility and to characterize the possible molecular events leading to tumor development in RbF/F; K14creERTM;p107−/− mice, we performed a differential expression analysis between normal skin and carcinomas using microarrays. The selection of differentially expressed genes was performed by SAM test (see Materials and Methods), providing a gene signature of 2256-probesets (1128 overexpressed and 1128 underexpressed in tumors; hereafter 2256-gene signature) (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of the samples using this gene signature revealed a homogeneous expression pattern in tumor samples (Fig. 4a). Consistent with the functional roles of the retinoblastoma family members, most of the overexpressed genes in the tumors were involved in cell cycle regulation, or DNA replication and repair, as evidenced by enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology biological processes (GOBP) terms (Fig. 4b). Additionally, we also found overexpression of genes involved in keratinization and epidermal cell differentiation, in agreement with the differentiated histology of the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse carcinomas, and processes such as RNA transport and splicing or translation (Fig. 4b). In contrast, underexpressed genes were involved in muscle development, which may be explained by the partial absence of dermal muscle layers in tumor samples, signaling, negative regulation of transcription and in cell adhesion (Fig. 4b), which is broadly associated with carcinogenesis processes.

Figure 4. Genomic analysis of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− tumors.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

a) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of carcinomas using the 2256 deregulated probesets was done with Pearson distance metrics and complete linkage method. Columns represent samples, and rows are genes. Green samples are normal control skin from adult mice. Red samples are RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− carcinomas. Z-scores in log2 scale were calculated for heatmap visualization. b) Enrichment analysis in Gene Ontology Biological Processes from the carcinoma signature of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse. Red bars correspond to overexpressed genes and green bars correspond to downregulated genes p-val: significance of enrichment. c) Common gene signature between RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse and at least 7 out of 15 different human SCC studies (from lung, head and neck, skin, esophagus, and cervix) obtained from “Cancer vs. Normal” comparisons in Oncomine (see Supp Table S3 and S4). Red boxes represent human genes overexpressed in SCC compared with normal tissue. Blue boxes represent human genes underexpressed in SCC compared with normal tissue. Bar plots represent the significance of the overlap, being the provided p-val for each specific gene the median-ranked p-val in each comparison. Genes are ordered by significance. Vertical red lines in bar plots represent p-val = 0.025. d) Significant GE overlapping between RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse and human HPV-infected carcinoma samples were found for both over- (in red) and under-expressed (blue) genes in Oncomine. For RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− carcinoma genes (columns represent human samples, and rows are genes) the heatmap, the number of uninfected/infected human samples analyzed, the number of common genes, and the significance of overlapping (p-val) are provided.

To explore whether the mouse tumors resemble human squamous cell carcinoma samples, an exhaustive comparison of the mouse tumor 2256-gene signature with gene datasets of human SCC cancer samples arising in different organs (skin, head and neck, lung or cervix) was performed, using the Oncomine human cancer genomics database (see Materials and Methods). This shows a very significant overlap between overexpressed genes (Supplementary Table 3, overlap n = 29 to 239 genes, p values from 6.7 x10−4 to 5.0×10−80, odds ratio from 2 to 4.7) or underexpressed genes (Supplementary Table 4, overlap n = 48 to 162 genes, p values from 5.5×10−7 to 2.1×10−22, odds ratio from 2. to 3.2) in mouse samples with multiple studies. Such extremely relevant overlapping, may suggest that transcriptome data could be used to extract common genes significantly deregulated in the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse and human SCC tumors. We found that 33 genes overexpressed and 12 genes underexpressed in mouse tumors were also found in at least 7 of the 15 studies of human tumors analyzed (Figure 4c), which might represent common biomarkers of human and mouse SCC. This meta-analysis of interspecies comparison corroborated the high degree of similarity between mouse and human SCC carcinomas at the molecular level. To further reinforce these findings, and to provide a wider analysis of the similarity between the changes in gene expression in the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse and other gene signatures, we performed a Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) study. This revealed novel similarities between overexpressed and underexpressed genes in mouse tumors and specific signal transduction pathways, and human tumors (Table I).

Table 1. GSEA analysis of RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse tumors.

Gene Set Name (N)1 Number of enriched genes NES FDR q-val
KOBAYASHI_EGFR_SIGNALING_24HR_DN (210) 153 2.93 < 0.00001
BERENJENO_TRANSFORMED_BY_RHOA_UP (474) 266 2.75 < 0.00001
GRAHAM_NORMAL_QUIESCENT_VS_NORMAL_DIVIDING_DN (70) 52 2.62 < 0.00001
BENPORATH_PROLIFERATION (116) 75 2.57 < 0.00001
GRAHAM_CML_DIVIDING_VS_NORMAL_QUIESCENT_UP (152) 87 2.54 < 0.00001
REN_BOUND_BY_E2F (46) 32 2.44 < 0.00001
MARKEY_RB1_ACUTE_LOF_DN (213) 111 2.36 < 0.00001
LE_EGR2_TARGETS_UP (99) 56 2.35 < 0.00001
VERNELL_RETINOBLASTOMA_PATHWAY_UP (35) 27 2.32 < 0.00001
EGUCHI_CELL_CYCLE_RB1_TARGETS (18) 17 2.28 < 0.00001
YU_MYC_TARGETS_UP (37) 27 2.26 < 0.00001
TANG_SENESCENCE_TP53_TARGETS_DN (35) 24 2.17 0.000014
BENPORATH_CYCLING_GENES (487) 214 2.14 0.000013
DANG_MYC_TARGETS_UP (109) 43 2.11 0.000012
SLEBOS_HEAD_AND_NECK_CANCER_WITH_HPV_UP (59) 24 2.09 0.000033
SARRIO_EPITHELIAL_MESENCHYMAL_TRANSITION_UP (15) 11 2.08 0.000042
MOLENAAR_TARGETS_OF_CCND1_AND_CDK4_DN (38) 25 2.05 0.000070
SCIAN_CELL_CYCLE_TARGETS_OF_TP53_AND_TP73_DN (22) 15 2.03 0.00015
RICKMAN_HEAD_AND_NECK_CANCER_F (48) 29 −2.72 < 0.00001
BERENJENO_TRANSFORMED_BY_RHOA_DN (352) 191 −2.71 < 0.00001
KUNINGER_IGF1_VS_PDGFB_TARGETS_UP (41) 7 −2.61 < 0.00001
GU_PDEF_TARGETS_UP (64) 33 −2.26 0.00006
WANG_SMARCE1_TARGETS_UP (136) 76 −2.15 0.00022
TSENG_IRS1_TARGETS_DN (117) 46 −2.13 0.00023
DAIRKEE_TERT_TARGETS_DN (63) 29 −2.11 0.00036
SENESE_HDAC2_TARGETS_DN (99) 47 −2.11 0.00037
THUM_MIR21_TARGETS_HEART_DISEASE_UP (17) 14 −2.06 0.00054
Open in a new tab

1N: number of genes from each gene set in mouse chip. 2) Shadowed rows represent overlapping of underexpressed genes in mouse tumors

NES: normalized enrichment score.

NES>0: enrichment in tumors; NES<0: enrichment in normal skin.

One of the studies observed in our GSEA analysis indicated the similarity between overexpressed genes in mouse tumors and human head and neck tumors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection27 (24 out of 59 genes in the signature, FDR q value = 0.000033). The HPV are present in human carcinomas of the cervix and head and neck with a prevalence of 90% and 30%, respectively. As the E7 oncogene from different HPVs induces the degradation of retinoblastoma family proteins28,29,30, we hypothesize that SCC of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice may also resemble HPV-infected human tumors. To confirm this, we compared the gene expression profiles between mouse and human HPV-infected carcinomas31 of the tongue, tonsil and cervix. The results of this comparison (Figure 4d) showed a very high similarities in these groups, thus indicating that the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse SCCs could be a potential model to understand the E7-dependent molecular mechanisms of HPV oncogenesis.

RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse tumors display partial inhibition of DNA damage p53-dependent regulatory network response

As commented above, the absence of pRb and p107 leads to partial impairment of p53-dependent functions. To further confirm these findings, we analyzed the expression patterns of p53-responsive genes in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− compared with normal skin. To this, we used GSEA of genes induced or repressed by DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner32. Our results indicated that although p53-activated genes are very significantly underexpressed in the tumors, the p53-repressed genes do not display overexpression in tumors (Table II). Thus, RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− carcinomas displayed partial inhibition of p53 function as transcriptional regulator, corroborating the luciferase experiments (Fig. 2b). In the same line of evidence, and in spite of showing a very different differentiation grade, we found strong similarities in the functional categories between the overexpressed (overlap 204, p value = 3.25x10−125, odds ratio 16.1) and underexpressed (overlap 201, p value = 1.63x10−153, odds ratio 18.7) genes in RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− SCCs and those previously characterized by upregulation or downregulation in carcinomas generated by specific deletion of p53 in stratified epithelia (Trp53F/F;K14cre and RbF/F;Trp53F/F;K14cre genotypes)33.

Table 2. GSEA of p53-responding genes in RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse tumors.

Gene Set Name (N)1 Analysis Number of enriched genes NES FDR q-val
p53-induced (1653) ES vs DiffES32 425 −1.55 < 0.0001*
  Rb;p107 tumors vs Normal skin 599 −1.68 < 0.0001*
p53-repressed (1313) ES vs DiffES32 260 1.41 < 0.0001*
  Rb;p107 tumors vs Normal skin 321 −1.01 0.374
Open in a new tab

1N: number of genes from each gene set in mouse chip.

NES: normalized enrichment score.

NES>0: enrichment in tumors or ES; NES<0: enrichment in normal skin or DiffES.

*Significant enrichment.

RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse tumors are sensitive to PTEN/AKT/mTOR inhibitors

As described above, the RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mouse carcinomas display underexpression of Pten, leading to AKT/mTOR signaling activation. This indicates that targeted therapies inhibiting this signaling pathway would be of relevance in the treatment of these tumors. In order to explore this possibility at the genome-wide level, we compared the 2256-gene signature with the gene expression profiles of human cancer cell lines showing differential sensitivities to these inhibitors. According to our hypothesis, the similarity of GE would indicate susceptibility to these agents. We found a significant overlap in gene expression between RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse carcinomas and cell lines sensitive to perifosine (AKT inhibitor) and temsirolimus (mTOR inhibitor) (Fig. 5a, b)34.

Figure 5. Genomic analysis of RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− tumors correspond to Akt and mTOR inhibition sensitivity.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Sensitivity to AKT inhibitor (a, perifosine) and mTOR (b, temsirolimus) was tested in a collection of human cancer cell lines. Transcriptome differences between sensitive versus resistant lines was compared with RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− carcinoma signature. Significant transcript overlapping was observed for over- (in red) and under-expressed (in blue) genes in both the mouse signature and the sensitive cells. For each inhibitor, we show the number of sensitive/resistant cell lines tested (columns represent samples, and rows are genes), the number of common genes, and the significance of overlapping (p-val).

To further substantiate the above commented observations, we performed a chemopreventive study. Mice were treated with tamoxifen, to induce the Rb1 recombination, and subsequently rapamycin was administered (10 mg/kg, thrice/week). After two months, we observed that Rapamicyn treatment produced an evident alleviation of the phenotype in snout, lips and eyelids (Fig. 6a-b'). Further, the histology study of these areas in the mouse cohorts (rapamycin treated n = 8, untreated n = 11) showed a reduced incidence of tumor development in all the cases (Fig. 6c). As expected, rapamycin-treated mice display reduced phosphorylation of P-S6 (Fig. 6d, d', f) and Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 6e, e', f). Of note, in spite of the reduction in the tumor susceptibility, the overall frail appearance and alopecia were not affected by the preventive rapamycin treatment (data not shown). Similarly, rapamycin-treated mice displayed evident signs of hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis (Fig. 6g', h') compared to control mice (rapamycin-treated, tamoxifen-untreated; Fig. 6g, h), and no significant reduction in epithelial proliferation compared with untreated mice (Fig. 6i, i', j). These results indicate that not all the physiological consequences of pRb and p107 loss in epithelia are attributable to the increased Akt/mTOR axis. However, mTOR inhibition significantly prevents tumor development.

Figure 6. Rapamycin treatment alleviates tumor development in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

a–b') External aspect of snout (a,a') and eyelid (b,b') of untreated (a,b) or Rapamycin-treated (a',b') RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice after tamoxifen treatment. c) Summary of tumor incidence in the quoted anatomical localizations in untreated (grey bars; n = 11) or Rapamycin treated (black bars n = 8) RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice after tamoxifen treatment. d-e') Immunohistochemistry showing the expression of phosphorylated S6 (d, d') and Akt (e, e') in oral epithelium of untreated (d, e) or Rapamycin treated (d', e') RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mice. f) Western blot analysis of protein extracts from snout of rapamycin-treated and untreated RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice, after tamoxifen application, showing the expression of the indicated proteins. Actin was used as loading control. g–h'') Representative examples of H&E stained palate (g, g', g'') and snout (h, h', h'') sections of control mice (RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice without tamoxifen treatment (g, h) Rapamycin treated (g', h') or untreated (g'', h'') RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice. i, I') Immunohistochemistry showing the BrdU in snout epithelia of Rapamycin treated (i) or untreated (I') RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mice. j) Quantitative analysis of BrdU incorporation in snout epithelia of the untreated/treated RbF/F;K14creERTM; p107−/− mice. Data come from at least three mice per genotype scoring three different sections per mouse and are shown as mean ± s.d. Bars = 150 μm.

Discussion

The Rb1 gene product is functionally inactivated in most human tumors2. However, Rb1 gene mutations are only found in small subsets of human tumors. This indicates that, as the functional inactivation of pRb probably also affects the other Rb family members p107 and p130, the specific inactivation of Rb1 gene is only able to induce tumorigenesis in restricted tissues35,36. In epidermis, although Rb1 loss promotes alterations in proliferation and differentiation, indicating the existence of unique functions for this protein in this tissue, it is insufficient to allow tumor development6. Overlapping functions between pRb and p107 in epidermis have been previously demonstrated in epidermis6. Interestingly, although there are dramatic changes in gene expression, the phenotype of RbF/F;K14cre is not aggravated by p130 loss14. These overlapping functions between pRb and p107 have been also described in other tissues37,38, but are particularly highlighted in stratified epithelia where the complete loss of pRb and p107 led to death by pnd 106. Moreover, double deficient epidermis leads to spontaneous tumor development in transplanted new born skin, indicating putative tumor suppressor functions of p107 in the absence of pRb13. Accordingly, double deficient keratinocytes are highly susceptible to Ha-ras transformation and resistant to oncogene-induced premature senescence13. Here, using an inducible mouse model for pRb loss in stratified epithelia to overcome the early lethality, we confirm such tumor suppressor functions of p107.

Previous microarray data using newborn epidermis samples, also revealed that the absence of pRb and p107 promoted overexpression of multiple E2F-dependent genes13. In contrast, in spite of p53 induction, multiple p53-dependent genes, predominantly associated to apoptosis induction, were actually downregulated13. Our present data also reinforce these findings, as we observe that the DNA damage-induced p53-activated genes are underexpressed in the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mouse carcinomas, and a significant overlap in gene expression was observed between tumors arising in RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice and spontaneous epidermal tumors promoted by specific deletion of p53 in stratified epithelia (Trp53F/F;K14cre and RbF/F;Trp53F/F;K14cre genotypes)33. In addition, as p53-mediated repression acts through interfering with distal enhancer activity and p53-activated genes occurs at the promoter regions32, we may also suggest that somatic deletion of pRb and p107 efficiently affect direct binding of p53 to the promoter regions of activated genes rather than distal enhancer binding. However, when we monitored possible defective signaling that may account for the decreased transcriptional activity of p53 observed over apoptotic genes39, and in particular focusing on p53 acetylation40, phosphorylation and methylation41, we observed normal activation. This potentially discards that defects in these modifications may account for the observed effect. This aspect would deserve future investigation.

Among the underexpressed genes in microarrays of RbF/F;K14cre; p107−/− skin, we found Pten gene. The expression of this gene is modulated by various transcription factors including p53, which enhances Pten transcription17. Our data showing decreased p53 transcriptional activity and reduced Pten expression might support this observation. The specific upregulation of ΔNp63 and c-jun in double deficient keratinocytes can also contribute to the Pten gene downregulation, as these two transcription factors have been recently involved in Pten gene repression25,26. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanisms by which pRb and p107 loss lead to such increased expression of p63 and and c-jun is presently unknown.

The finding of tumor development specifically in the oral area concurs with the observed reduced expression of Pten. The expression of a constitutive active Akt in stratified epithelia of transgenic mice led to preneoplasic lesions in the oral cavity and perioral regions22,42. Importantly, these lesions did not progress to overt squamous tumors due to the induction of premature senescence, which is overcome by specific ablation of p53, but not pRb42. Comparable incidence of tumors showing similar characteristics was found in mice bearing the specific elimination of Pten and p53 genes in stratified epithelia42. The present data are in agreement and also reinforce these observations, as the absence of p107 can bypass the oncogene-induced senescence in pRb-deficient keratinocytes13. Our data are also in agreement with the recent report showing that the loss of pRb and p107 can predispose to oral tumors in mice43, although the authors do not report any spontaneous tumor development43. This might be due to different experimental procedures and/or to the different genetic background of the transgenic mice43.

Gene expression profiles comparing normal and carcinoma samples provide information about genes that could display important functions in the carcinoma maintenance or aggressiveness, and non-essential roles in the normal tissue. The therapeutic inhibition of these genes would not affect normal tissue homeostasis but may affect tumor growth or invasive properties, thus becoming potential molecular targets for therapy. In addition, interspecies comparison between human and mouse could also be useful to determine which genes display similar expression patterns so they can be considered candidate targets for therapy and/or biomarkers of human cancer44. The present data of comparative genomic analyses indicate that the RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− mice could represent a possible model for human squamous malignancies. This is of a particular relevance in the case of human cancers bearing HPV infection, which display a very significant gene expression overlap with mouse tumors. This observation, which is in agreement with the reported role of HPV E7 oncogene mediating the degradation of the retinoblastoma family members28,29,30, also reinforces the proposed role of HPV E7 oncogene in the genesis of this type of tumors43. Also in line with our observations, it has been reported that the expression of E7 oncogene is able to induce Akt activity in vitro in a manner dependent on pRb binding and inactivation, and similar increase was also reported in HPV-positive cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions when compared with normal cervical tissue45.

The HNSCC represents the sixth most common human cancer worldwide, with roughly half a million new cases each year46. Despite progress in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate for oral cancer has not improved significantly over the past decades and remains at about 50–55%46. Numerous new targeted therapies have been proposed for this disease, in particular affecting Akt pathway (discussed in47). Our present data showing that rapamycin treatment significantly prevent the tumor development also reinforce these hypotheses and are in agreement with previous studies indicating that mTOR inhibition could be beneficial for the treatment of this type of cancer48,49,50,51. Also in agreement, we observed that the deregulated genes in mouse tumors are differentially expressed in cell lines sensitive to Akt or mTOR inhibition.

Collectively, our present data revealed a novel, previously unreported, functional connection between the three major tumor suppressor genes p53, Pten and pRb. Our results also highlight the relevance of these tumor suppressors in specific human malignancies and open new possible therapeutic avenues for the treatment of these diseases, and in particular those associated with HPV infection.

Methods

Mice

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee (CEEA) and conducted in compliance with Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT) guidelines. RbF/F and p107−/− mouse models have been previously described6,42, PtenF/F mice were kindly provided by Dr. Anton Berns (NKI) and K14creERTM were purchased from Jackson laboratory (Jax 005107). They were backcrossed for 10 generations to a pure FVB/N genetic background. Tamoxifen treatment (Sigma) was topically administered in the shaved backskin of the animals (2x2 cm) at 20 mg/per day dissolved in DMSO/acetone for 5 consecutive days. Primary keratinocytes were cultured as described6. 1 μM 4-hydroxitamoxifen (4OHTX) diluted in ethanol was added to primary keratinocytes for 72 hours in the culture medium. Rapamycin (LC Laboratories, R-5000) treatment was intraperitoneally administered three days per week for two months (10 mg/Kg) to mice treated previously with tamoxifen. Newborn skin transplants were performed as previously reported8.

Immunohistochemical methods

Immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence analyses were performed in formalin or ethanol fixed paraffin embedded samples as previously reported8,22. Antibodies used were anti K5, anti K6 (Covance), anti K10 (Dako), mouse monoclonal anti K15 (Neomarkers), anti Pten (Sta Cruz Biotech.), anti laminin (Sigma), anti Akt phospho-Ser473 (IHC Specific) and anti phospho-Ser235/236 S6 ribosomal protein (Cell Signaling). Fluorochrome or Biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch. For immunohistochemistry, signal was amplified using avidin-peroxidase (ABC elite kit Vector) and peroxidase was visualized using diaminobenzidine as a substrate (DAB kit Vector). Control slides were obtained by replacing primary antibodies with PBS (data not shown). Mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd; 0.1 mg/g weight in 0.9% NaCl; Roche) 1 hour before sacrifice. BrdUrd incorporation was monitored by immunofluorescence in ethanol-fixed or in formalin-fixed sections using an anti BrdU antibody (Roche) as described52.

Western blot

Western blot was performed as described previously6,8,22. Secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch. Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminscence Substrate (Pierce) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations to visualize the bands. Antibodies used are anti pRb (Pharmigen), anti p107, anti p130, anti Pten, anti p63, anti CBP, anti c-jun, anti Akt (Sta. Cruz Biotechnology), anti Tip60, anti Pcaf, anti p21, anti p73, anti phospho-Ser392 p53, methyl K372 p53, acetyl K373+K382 p53, anti SetD8, anti smyd2 (AbCam), anti Sirt1 (Sigma), anti ΔNp73 (Imgenex), anti Akt phosho S473 and phospho T308, anti phospho-Ser235/236 S6 ribosomal protein (Cell Signaling) and anti p53 (Novocastra). Loading was controlled by using an anti Actin antibody (Sta.Cruz Biotechnology).

The panel of phosphorylation profiles of kinases were analyzed following manufacter recomendations (Human Phospho-Kinase Array, ARY003, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Membranes were incubated with 500 μg of protein extract from skin and tumor samples. This array screens for relative levels of phosphorylation of 39 proteins. Quantification of the relative expression of specific phosphorylated protein was determined by QuantityOne software (BioRad).

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP)

Genomic DNA samples (1 μg) were modified by sodium bisulphite using the CpGenome DNA modification kit (Intergen) following the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA methylation status of the promoter region of Pten and cdkn1a genes was analyzed by methylation specific PCR (MSP) after sodium bisulphite modification of DNA. Mouse genomic DNA universally methylated for all genes (Zymo Research) was used as a positive control for methylated alleles. Water blanks were included with each assay. Following amplification, PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis through a 2.5% agarose gel and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination. For Pten-MSP, Pten-MD (5′-TTTTCGGAGTATCGATTAAGGC-3′) and Pten-MR (5′-GAAAAAAACAAAAACGAAAAACG-3′) primers were used in the methylated reactions, which amplify a 205bp product. For cdkn1a-MSP, cdkn1a-MD (5′- GTTAGCGAGTTTTCGGGATC-3′) and cdkn1a-MR (5′-CTCGACTACTACAATTAACGTCGAA-3′) primers were used for the methylated reaction, which amplify a 111bp product. The cdkn1a-UD (5′-GGTTAGTGAGTTTTTGGGATTG-3′) and cdkn1a-UR (5′-TCAACTACTACAATTAACATCAAA-3′) primers were used for the unmethylated reaction, which amplify a 111bp product.

Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of mouse RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− carcinomas

RNA was obtained from 4 normal wild type control skin samples and 10 carcinomas from RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− genotype, and purified from mice tissue as previously described8. Hybridization was done to Affymetrix Mouse GE MOE430 2.0 array. Raw and processed data were deposited in the GEO database with the accession identifier GSE38257. Supervised analysis of differential expression between tumors and normal tissue was done using SAM test53 available in the open source software Multiexperiment Viewer (MeV)54, using 200 random permutations. For further analyses, a number of 1128 probesets (representing 2.5% of the array) were selected by fold change as overexpressed in the carcinomas or underexpressed (giving rise to 2256 deregulated probesets). Using this approach, all selected probesets display highly significant q-values (q-val = 0) and fold change values from 4.38 to 4.16 (for overexpressed) or from −4.38 to −4.10 (for underexpressed). MOE430 2.0 Affymetrix chip probeset IDs were mapped to human using Ailun web utility55. Enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms was done upon uploading selected probesets identifiers into DAVID Functional Annotation web tool, which computes enrichment of GO biological processes terms using EASE score56,57.

Enrichment analysis of p53-regulated genes

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)58,59 was used to Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)58,59 was used to compare the gene expression pattern of the mouse RbF/F;K14creERTM;p107−/− tumors with other gene signatures. In Table 1, we analyze the enrichment with a collection of 2392 different gene sets (available at http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/collections.jsp) that represents gene expression signatures of genetic and chemical perturbations (subgroup c2.cgp). A selection of some relevant and highly statistically significant enriched gene sets was done. We permutated the gene set for 1000 times rather than permutating the phenotype because the sample number is small. In Table 2, we analyze the enrichment of p53-activated and p53-repressed DNA damage response genes in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells within the mouse tumors when compared to normal skin. Gene sets were downloaded from32, and fall into 2 groups: i) 2070 genes activated and ii) 1627 genes repressed upon p53 activation with DNA damage agent adriamycin as determined by both ChIP-seq (with a pan-p53 antibody) and GE (GE) microarray data of mES cells32. ES and 14-d differentiated ES gene expression dataset was retrieved from the GEO database (GSE2972).

Overlapping analysis in human cancer GE studies

We used Oncomine GE Signatures database to search for overlapping60. Association of the mapped signatures with the database signatures was tested using Fisher's exact test, and was considered significant for Odds Ratio>1.5, and p-val<0.006. Genes overexpressed or underexpressed in the mouse carcinomas were mapped to human gene symbols and loaded into the Oncomine database. We have searched for overlaps using different filtering criteria, based on the type of human cancer comparison performed. These criteria were: i) “Cancer vs. Normal”, to search for similarities with human squamous cell carcinomas of different tissue of origin; ii) “Drug sensitivity”, to search for similarities with human cancer cell lines with differential sensitivities to specific drugs; and iii) “Other”, to search for similarities with human papillomavirus (HPV) infected tumors.

RT-PCR

For the qPCR analyses, total RNA was isolated from mice skins using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacture's instructions. Genomic DNA was eliminated from the samples by a DNase treatment (Rnase-Free Dnase Set Qiagen). RNA from each sample (800 ng) was reverse transcribed in a final volume of 40 μl using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen) and an oligo (dT)18 primer. Real time PCR was performed in a 7500 Fast Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with 10 μl reactions containing 5 μl of Power SYBR GREEN PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), 3 μl or RNase free water, 0.5 μl of each primer (500 nM), and 1 μl of cDNA as PCR template. Cycling parameters were 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 min to activate DNA polymerase followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min. Detection of fluorescence was carried out at the end of each amplification step. Moreover, after each amplification, melting curves were performed to verify specificity of the target and absence of primer dimerization. Reaction efficiency was calculated for each primer combination and GUS B gene was used as reference gene. The sequences of the specific oligonucleotides used are as follows:

Pten Forward 5′… AGG CCA ACC GAT ACT TCT CTC…3′

Pten Reverse 5′… CAT CTG GAG TCA CAG AAG TTG AA…3′

GUSB Forward 5′… GAGGATCAACAGTGCCCATT…3′

GUSB Reverse 5′… CAGCCTCAAAGGGGAGGT…3′

Luciferase assays

Primary keratinocytes were incubated for forty-eight hours with 4-hydroxytamoxifen to induce pRb deletion. Transient transfections were performed with the Superfect reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol after 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment. Thirty-six hours after transfection, cells were harvested for luciferase assays (Promega Dual-Luciferase Kit). Firefly luciferase values were standardized to Renilla luciferase values (pRL-SV40; Promega) to account for differences in transfection efficiency between samples. Expression plasmids coding for pGL3-p53 responding elements (kindly provided by Dr. I. Palmero, IIB, Spain) and pGL3-E2F responding elements (kindly provided by Dra. X Lu, Ludwig Institute, London) were used. Pten promoter cloning was performed by PCR amplification of −1 and −1365 region with specific primers (Forward 5′…GGTGTGTTATCTAGGTAAAGACTGTCGCCG…3′ and Reverse 5′…GGCGGTGTCATAATGTCTCTCAGCACATAG…3′) using DNA from skin mouse as a matrix. Amplified fragment was inserted in HindIII-NheI of pGL3 vector (Promega). Cloning fragment was verified by automatic sequencing.

Author Contributions

J.M.P. and M.S. directed all aspects of the Rbp107 project. M.S. and J.M.P. designed the experiments, M.S., C.C., R.G-E. and J.M.P. analyzed the data, and J.M.P. wrote the manuscript. C.C., C.S., C.L., M.D., M.F.L., X.A., F.P. and M.S. performed the experiments. R.G-E. and J.M.P. supervised the gene array data collection and analysis processing.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep00828-s1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Supplementary Information

data set 1

srep00828-s2.xls (3MB, xls)
Supplementary Information

Data set 2

srep00828-s3.xls (2.4MB, xls)

Acknowledgments

Grant support: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) grants SAF2011-26122-C02-01 and SAF2012-34378, Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid Oncocycle Program Grants S2006/BIO-0232 and S2010/BMD-2470, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo grant ISCIII-RETIC RD06/0020/0029 and from Fundación Sandra Ibarra to JMP. Grant AP99782012 from MMA Foundation (to MD) and RD06/0020/0111 (to FP) are also ackowledged. The excellent technical support by Pilar Hernández in histology and the personnel of the CIEMAT Animal Facility are specially recognized.

References

  1. Weinberg R. A. The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81, 323–330 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nevins J. R. The Rb/E2F pathway and cancer. Hum Mol Genet 10, 699–703 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke A. R. et al. Requirement for a functional Rb-1 gene in murine development. Nature 359, 328–330 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacks T. et al. Effects of an Rb mutation in the mouse. Nature 359, 295–300 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee E. Y. et al. Mice deficient for Rb are nonviable and show defects in neurogenesis and haematopoiesis. Nature 359, 288–294 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ruiz S. et al. Unique and overlapping functions of pRb and p107 in the control of proliferation and differentiation in epidermis. Development 131, 2737–2748 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ruiz S. et al. Unexpected roles for pRb in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 65, 9678–9686 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martinez-Cruz A. B. et al. Spontaneous squamous cell carcinoma induced by the somatic inactivation of retinoblastoma and Trp53 tumor suppressors. Cancer Res 68, 683–692 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martinez-Cruz A. B. et al. Spontaneous tumor formation in Trp53-deficient epidermis mediated by chromosomal instability and inflammation. Anticancer research 29, 3035–3042 (2009). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bornachea O. et al. EMT and induction of miR-21 mediate metastasis development in Trp53-deficient tumours. Scientific reports 2, 434 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garcia-Escudero R. et al. Gene expression profiling of mouse p53-deficient epidermal carcinoma defines molecular determinants of human cancer malignancy. Molecular cancer 9, 193 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Costa C. et al. E2F1 loss induces spontaneous tumour development in Rb-deficient epidermis. Oncogene (2012) doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lara M. F. et al. p107 acts as a tumor suppressor in pRb-deficient epidermis. Mol Carcinog 47, 105–113 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lara M. F. et al. Gene profiling approaches help to define the specific functions of retinoblastoma family in epidermis. Mol Carcinog 47, 209–221 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Santos M. et al. Susceptibility of pRb-deficient epidermis to chemical skin carcinogenesis is dependent on the p107 allele dosage. Mol Carcinog 47, 815–821 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lara M. F. & Paramio J. M. The Rb family connects with the Tp53 family in skin carcinogenesis. Mol Carcinog 46, 618–623 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stambolic V. et al. Regulation of PTEN transcription by p53. Molecular cell 8, 317–325 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vivanco I. & Sawyers C. L. The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 489–501 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ming M. & He Y. Y. PTEN: new insights into its regulation and function in skin cancer. The Journal of investigative dermatology 129, 2109–2112 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Segrelles C. et al. Functional roles of Akt signaling in mouse skin tumorigenesis. Oncogene 21, 53–64 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruiz S. et al. Abnormal epidermal differentiation and impaired epithelial-mesenchymal tissue interactions in mice lacking the retinoblastoma relatives p107 and p130. Development 130, 2341–2353 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Segrelles C. et al. Deregulated Activity of Akt in Epithelial Basal Cells Induces Spontaneous Tumors and Heightened Sensitivity to Skin Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 67, 10879–10888 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Segrelles C. et al. Constitutively Active Akt Induces Ectodermal Defects and Impaired Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling. Molecular biology of the cell 19, 137–149 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ruiz S., Santos M. & Paramio J. M. Is the loss of pRb essential for the mouse skin carcinogenesis? Cell Cycle 5, 625–629 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hettinger K. et al. c-Jun promotes cellular survival by suppression of PTEN. Cell death and differentiation 14, 218–229 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Leonard M. K. et al. DeltaNp63alpha regulates keratinocyte proliferation by controlling PTEN expression and localization. Cell death and differentiation 18, 1924–1933 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Slebos R. J. et al. Gene expression differences associated with human papillomavirus status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 12, 701–709 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Buitrago-Perez A. et al. A Humanized Mouse Model of HPV-Associated Pathology Driven by E7 Expression. PLoS One 7, e41743 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Munger K. et al. Biological activities and molecular targets of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Oncogene 20, 7888–7898 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wise-Draper T. M. & Wells S. I. Papillomavirus E6 and E7 proteins and their cellular targets. Front Biosci 13, 1003–1017 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pyeon D. et al. Fundamental differences in cell cycle deregulation in human papillomavirus-positive and human papillomavirus-negative head/neck and cervical cancers. Cancer Res 67, 4605–4619 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li M. et al. Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms and Functions for p53-Activated and p53-Repressed DNA Damage Response Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells. Molecular cell 46, 30–42 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Garcia-Escudero R. & Paramio J. M. Gene expression profiling of mouse epidermal keratinocytes. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J) 585, 171–181 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Greshock J. et al. Molecular target class is predictive of in vitro response profile. Cancer Res 70, 3677–3686 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Herwig S. & Strauss M. The retinoblastoma protein: a master regulator of cell cycle, differentiation and apoptosis. Eur J Biochem 246, 581–601 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sellers W. R. & Kaelin W. G. Jr Role of the retinoblastoma protein in the pathogenesis of human cancer. J Clin Oncol 15, 3301–3312 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dannenberg J. H., Schuijff L., Dekker M., van der Valk M. & Riele H. T. Tissue-specific tumor suppressor activity of retinoblastoma gene homologs p107 and p130. Genes Dev 18, 2952–2962 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Robanus-Maandag E. et al. p107 is a suppressor of retinoblastoma development in pRb-deficient mice. Genes Dev 12, 1599–1609 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dai C. & Gu W. p53 post-translational modification: deregulated in tumorigenesis. Trends in molecular medicine 16, 528–536 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sykes S. M. et al. Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Molecular cell 24, 841–851 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Scoumanne A. & Chen X. Protein methylation: a new mechanism of p53 tumor suppressor regulation. Histol Histopathol 23, 1143–1149 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Moral M. et al. Akt activation synergizes with Trp53 loss in oral epithelium to produce a novel mouse model for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 69, 1099–1108 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shin M. K., Pitot H. C. & Lambert P. F. Pocket proteins suppress head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 72, 1280–1289 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Garcia-Escudero R. & Paramio J. M. Gene expression profiling as a tool for basic analysis and clinical application of human cancer. Mol Carcinog 47, 573–579 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Menges C. W., Baglia L. A., Lapoint R. & McCance D. J. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 up-regulates AKT activity through the retinoblastoma protein. Cancer Res 66, 5555–5559 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Leemans C. R., Braakhuis B. J. & Brakenhoff R. H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 11, 9–22 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moral M. & Paramio J. M. Akt pathway as a target for therapeutic intervention in HNSCC. Histol Histopathol 23, 1269–1278 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Molinolo A. A. et al. Dissecting the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network: emerging results from the head and neck cancer tissue array initiative. Clin Cancer Res 13, 4964–4973 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Amornphimoltham P. et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin, a molecular target in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res 65, 9953–9961 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Molinolo A. A. et al. Dysregulated molecular networks in head and neck carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol 45, 324–334 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Raimondi A. R., Molinolo A. & Gutkind J. S. Rapamycin prevents early onset of tumorigenesis in an oral-specific K-ras and p53 two-hit carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res 69, 4159–4166 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Paramio J. M., Navarro M., Segrelles C., Gomez-Casero E. & Jorcano J. L. PTEN tumour suppressor is linked to the cell cycle control through the retinoblastoma protein. Oncogene 18, 7462–7468 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tusher V. G., Tibshirani R. & Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 5116–5121 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Saeed A. I. et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34, 374–378 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Chen H. Y. et al. A five-gene signature and clinical outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 356, 11–20 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Dennis G. Jr et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4, P3 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hosack D. A., Dennis G. Jr, Sherman B. T., Lane H. C. & Lempicki R. A. Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol 4, R70 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mootha V. K. et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature genetics 34, 267–273 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Subramanian A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 15545–15550 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rhodes D. R. et al. Oncomine 3.0: genes, pathways, and networks in a collection of 18,000 cancer gene expression profiles. Neoplasia 9, 166–180 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep00828-s1.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)
Supplementary Information

data set 1

srep00828-s2.xls (3MB, xls)
Supplementary Information

Data set 2

srep00828-s3.xls (2.4MB, xls)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES