Skip to main content
PMC home page
mAbs logoLink to mAbs
. 2012 Sep 1;4(5):578–585. doi: 10.4161/mabs.21328

Chromatographic analysis of the acidic and basic species of recombinant monoclonal antibodies

Yi Du 1, Alison Walsh 1, Robin Ehrick 1, Wei Xu 1, Kimberly May 1, Hongcheng Liu 1,*
PMCID: PMC3499298  PMID: 22820257

Abstract

The existence of multiple variants with differences in either charge, molecular weight or other properties is a common feature of monoclonal antibodies. These charge variants are generally referred to as acidic or basic compared with the main species. The chemical nature of the main species is usually well-understood, but understanding the chemical nature of acidic and basic species, and the differences between all three species, is critical for process development and formulation design. Complete understanding of acidic and basic species, however, is challenging because both species are known to contain multiple modifications, and it is likely that more modifications may be discovered. This review focuses on the current understanding of the modifications that can result in the generation of acidic and basic species and their affect on antibody structure, stability and biological functions. Chromatography elution profiles and several critical aspects regarding fraction collection and sample preparations necessary for detailed characterization are also discussed.

Keywords: Recombinant monoclonal antibody, acidic species, basic species, posttranslational modifications

Introduction

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are heterogeneous in their biochemical and biophysical properties due to multiple posttranslational modification and degradation events. Variants are commonly observed when mAbs are analyzed by charged based-separation techniques such as isoelectric focusing (IEF) gel electrophoresis, capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) gel electrophoresis, cation exchange chromatography (CEX) and anion exchange chromatography (AEX). These variants are generally referred to as acidic or basic species as compared with the main species. Acidic species are variants with lower apparent pI and basic species are variants with higher apparent pI when antibodies are analyzed using IEF based methods. When analyzed by chromatography-based methods, acidic species and basic species are defined based on their retention times relative to the main peak. Acidic species are the variants that elute earlier than the main peak from CEX or later then than the main peak from AEX, while basic species are the variants that elute later than the main peak from CEX or earlier than the main peak from AEX.

Although there is general agreement about the profile and amounts of acidic and basic species observed using IEF-based and chromatography-based methods, subtle differences may exist because of differences in the mechanisms of separation. IEF separates antibody variants based on overall charge difference (apparent pI), but, in addition to the overall charge, distribution of charge plays a critical role in the separation of antibody variants by chromatography because it may affect the interaction of antibodies with column resins. The difference between IEF and IEX has been repeatedly demonstrated and reported in literature. For example, fractions of a murine mAb with different retention times separated by a weak cation exchange (WCX) column showed identical pI when subsequently analyzed by IEF.1 A recombinant mAb with either aspartate (Asp) on both heavy chains or one Asp on one heavy chain and one isoaspartate (isoAsp) on the other heavy chain at the same positions had identical pI when analyzed by IEF, and yet these variants could be resolved by CEX.2 Fab fragments of a recombinant mouse/human chimeric antibody with a pyroglutamate (pyroGlu) on either the light chain or the heavy chain, and therefore with no expected pI difference, could be resolved by a strong cation exchange (SCX) column.3 These examples indicate that chromatography-based separation is not solely dependent on the overall charges because separation can be achieved even in the absence of charge differences. Therefore, an apparent pI based on theoretical calculation or determined experimentally by IEF-based methods may not be adequate to predict the elution order from chromatography separation methods, although the primary driving force for separation is charge difference.

Charge variants may substantially affect the in vitro and in vivo properties of antibodies. It has been demonstrated using chemically-modified antibodies that charge variation can alter binding to proteins or cell membrane targets, thus affecting the tissue penetration, tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antibodies.4-13 It is important to note, however, that these antibodies were deliberately modified and thus were highly enriched with one particular modification. Low abundance acidic and basic species of recombinant mAbs that were formed due to multiple modifications did not show differences in properties such as potency, binding to FcRn and PK compared with the main species or the unfractionated material.14 As will be discussed, the effects of variants are highly dependent on the nature, location and degree of posttranslational modifications that cause the formation of acidic and basic species.

This article focuses on characterization of acidic and basic species separated by chromatography techniques and includes information on charge heterogeneity reported since the publication of two reviews in 2008.15,16 Although acidic and basic species are commonly observed by IEF and cIEF, collecting enough materials from IEF and cIEF for detailed characterization is challenging. Preparative scale IEF-based separation techniques that are suitable for fraction collection exist, but the current knowledge of acidic and basic species is mainly based on characterization of variants collected from chromatography-based methods, which will be the focus of this review.

Main Species

The main species is the antibody that elutes as the major peak on chromatograms. The main species does not necessarily correspond to the unmodified or non-degraded antibody. In fact, the main peak typically consists of species of antibodies with three types of typical posttranslational modifications: (1) cyclization of the N-terminal glutamine (Gln) to pyroGlu; (2) removal of the heavy chain C-terminal lysine (Lys); and (3) glycosylation of the conserved asparagine (Asn) residue in the CH2 domain with neutral oligosaccharides. N-terminal Gln is encoded in the genes of either or both of the light and heavy chain, which can spontaneously cyclize to form pyroGlu after synthesis. Most of the antibodies at the time of analysis contain N-terminal pyroGlu instead of the original Gln and thus elute as the main peak.3,17,18 Similarly, the heavy chain C-terminal Lys is also encoded in the gene of heavy chain. Incomplete removal of the C-terminal Lys by carboxypeptidase results in antibodies with zero, one or two C-terminal Lys residues.19 Antibodies without any C-terminal Lys are usually found in the main species,1,3,17,18,20-23 although an antibody with two C-terminal Lys as the main peak has been reported.24 Lastly, the conserved Asn residue in the CH2 domain is glycosylated with N-linked oligosaccharides. The main glycoforms of recombinant mAbs from mammalian cell cultures are core-fucosylated complex biantennary structures with zero, one or two terminal galactose residues. The main species serve as an important control for detailed characterization of acidic and basic species.

Acidic Species

Acidic species are defined as the antibody variants that elute earlier than the main peak during CEX or later than the main peak during AEX analysis. The main causes for the formation of acidic species are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Modifications that form acidic species.

Acidic species References
Sialic acid
 14,17,20,25,26
Deamidation
 1,2,14,17,27-39
Non-classical disulfide linkage
 40,41
Trisulfide bonds
 42
High mannose
 23
Thiosulfide modification
 43
Glycation
 14,44-46
Modification by maleuric acid
 21
Cysteinylation
 48
Reduced disulfide bonds
 14
Non-reduced species
 14
Fragments 23,25,36
Open in a new tab

Sialic acid has been commonly reported to contribute to the formation of acidic species. Sialic acid has been detected in the acidic fractions of a recombinant IgG1 antibody expressed in NS0 cells.17 Acidic fractions of recombinant IgG1 antibodies expressed in CHO cell lines also contain higher level of sialic acid.14,25 The percentage of acidic species was found to be substantially lower when a recombinant mAb expressed in goats was analyzed by CEX after treatment with sialidase, suggesting that the presence of sialic acid is the major cause of these acidic species.20 Sialic acid has also been detected in the acidic regions of an IgG4 antibody when it was analyzed using CEX.26

Deamidation of Asn residues has also been widely reported as a major cause of acidic species. Deamidation occurs both in the variable domains, especially in the exposed and flexible complementarity-determining region (CDR), as well as in the constant domains (Table 2). Deamidation of Asn residues in the CDR region is almost guaranteed to result in the generation of acidic species.2,17,27-30 Although there is a minimal difference in the pKa between the side chain of isoAsp and Asp, an antibody and its Fab fragments with isoAsp33 in the light chain CDR1 elute later than the antibody with Asp33 at the same position, and both of them elute earlier than the antibody with the original Asn residues.27 The fact that an antibody with either isoAsp or Asp at the same position elutes at different retention times suggests a conformational difference that affects the charge distribution, and thus is evidence of antibody interactions with column resin.

Table 2. Major deamidation sites of recombinant monoclonal antibodies.

Locations Products References
Light chain CDR1, Asn30
 Asp
 2
Light chain CDR2, Asn55
 IsoAsp
 2
Light chain CDR1, Asn33
 Asp and isoAsp
 27
Heavy chain CDR2, Asn55
 Asp and isoAsp
 28
Heavy chain CDR2, Asn55
 Not determined
 17
Heavy chain CDR2, Asn55
 Not determined
 29
Heavy chain CDR2, Asn55
 Asp and isoAsp
 30
Heavy chain, CH3 domain
(First and second N in SNGPENNYK)
  
 14,31-36
Heavy chain, CH2 domain
(QDWLNGK)
 Asp and isoAsp
 32,34,37,38
Heavy chain, CH3 domain
(LHNHYTQK)
 Not determined
 14
Light chain, CL domain
(First N in LLNNFYPR)		 Asp and isoAsp 32
Open in a new tab

Deamidation of the Asn residues in the constant region of CH3 domain with the amino acid sequence SNGQPENNYK has also been widely reported.31-36 Although the specific products from each site are still debated, it is generally agreed that deamidation occurs only at the first and the second Asn residues in this sequence. Deamidation of other Asn residues in the constant regions including the Asn residue in the CH2 domain with the amino acid sequence LNGK32,34,37,38 and the first Asn in the sequence LLNNFYPR of light chain constant region32 has also been reported. Deamidation of Asn residues in the constant regions also most likely results in the formation of acidic species.14,17,33,36 Various levels of isoAsp were also detected in several acidic fractions of an IgG4 molecule as measured by IsoQuant, which specifically detected isoAsp.39 It is worth noting that various combinations of deamidation of Asn141 on either one or both of the heavy chains of a murine mAb, and Asn161 on either one or both of the light chains, formed a repeated peak pattern of acidic species when analyzed by CEX.1

Although not as widely observed as sialic acid and deamidation, other modifications have also been shown to result in the generation of acidic species. For example, IgG2 with the non-classical disulfide linkage (IgG2B and IgGA/B) elutes earlier than the molecule with the classical linkage (IgGA) when analyzed by CEX.40,41 When analyzed using AEX, antibodies containing a trisulfide bond, which was first identified in recombinant human IgG2, elute later than the main peak, and therefore correspond to acidic species.42 Interestingly, an antibody variant with high mannose content was also slightly enriched in the acidic fraction of a recombinant mAb, although there is no charge difference between the high mannose oligosaccharides and complex biantennary oligosaccharides with core fucose.23 This again highlights the fact that chromatography-based separation is not based only on the charge differences, but also on subtle conformational differences. Thiosulfate, which has been used in formulation to prevent oxidation caused by light exposure, can react with the antibody to form acidic species.43 Glycation, a reaction between reducing sugars and either the side chain of Lys residue or the N-terminal primary amine, results in the formation of acidic species, as expected, due to neutralization of the positive charges.14,44-46 Acidic species of a fully human mAb expressed in transgenic goats was identified due to a modification of the light chain and heavy chain N-terminal amine by maleuric acid.21 Light exposure resulted in earlier elution of an antibody Fab fragment from a CEX column, which was attributed to the modification of a histidine residue in the heavy chain CDR2 region.47 A recombinant mAb with cysteinylated Cys104 in the heavy chain CDR3 elutes earlier than the antibody after de-cysteinylation.48 Antibodies with non-reducible species or reduced disulfide bonds14 and various fragments23,25,36 are also enriched in the acidic fractions.

Impact on structure, stability and function

The potential effect on structure, stability and function due to various modifications that cause the generation of acidic species is highly dependent on their locations. Modifications that are located in the Fc region may not have a significant effect on Fab fragments because of the flexible hinge region. For example, the presence of sialic acid does not affect antibody potency.14,17 On the other hand, modifications that are located in the Fab region, especially in the CDR region, are the most likely have a substantial effect on antigen binding and potency. The impacts of deamidation are summarized in Table 3. Deamidation in the CDR regions results in various degrees of reduction in antigen binding affinity and potency of recombinant mAbs.2,23,27 The effect of deamidation has also been studied using site-directed mutagenesis, where replacement of Asn 55 in the CDR2 of heavy chains by Asp resulted in a 14-fold reduction in the antigen binding affinity of an antibody.28 Slight differences in the secondary structure are observed between Fab with either isoAsp30 or Asn30 in the light chain CDR1.27 Interestingly, a Fab with Asp30 has a higher melting temperature (Tm) than the Fab with the original Asn and the Fab with isoAsp has the lowest Tm when studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The effect of non-classical disulfide bond linkage varies from antibody to antibody. An IgG2 with the non-classical disulfide bond linkage (IgG2-B) shares a similar secondary structure as an IgG2-A with the classical disulfide bond linkage, but with a smaller hydrodynamic size and different higher order structures and thermal stability.49 In potency assays, IgG2-B has either the same or lower potency than IgG2-A.41,49 The presence of trisulfide bonds in the hinge region has been shown to not affect the thermal stability of an IgG2 antibody.42 Glycation increases the formation of aggregates without altering antibody conformation,44 suggesting decreased positive surface charges caused by the glycation of Lys likely results in lower repulsion between antibody molecules. Ten percent glycation of a Lys residue (K65) in the heavy chain CDR2 of an antibody did not affect its binding affinity.46 The effects of cysteinylation and decysteinylation have been extensively investigated.48 The cysteinylation of Cys104 in the CDR3 of the heavy chain can be removed by mild reduction with free cysteine; however, Cys104 after decysteinylation cannot be modified by the alkylation reagent iodoacetimide, suggesting the modification site is less accessible after decysteinylation. While no difference in the hydrodynamic size is measured by ultracentrifugation, the antibody after decysteinylation is retained longer on SEC column, suggesting a stronger interaction with the column matrix. In addition, the antibody with cysteinylation showed decreased thermal stability, was more prone to form aggregates and was only 39% as potent as the decysteinylated antibody.

Table 3. Impact of deamidation.

Locations Effects Reference
Light chain, CDR1
 Asp30/Asn30 only 70% as potent as Asn/Asn30
 2
Light chain CDR1
 Asp30/Asn30 has 39% and isoAsp30/Asn30 has 60% of binding affinity compared with Asn30/Asn30 of 96% binding affinity. Slight difference in the secondary structure of Fab with isoAsp compared with Fab with Asn30. Higher Tm for Fab with Asp30 and lower Tm for Fab with isoAsp30 compared with Fab with Asn30
 27
Heavy chain CDR2
 14 fold reduction in binding affinity compared with the antibody with Asn
 28
Heavy chain CDR2
 IsoAsp55 or Asp55 in one heavy chain only 20% potent as antibody with two Asn. Fab with either isoAsp55 or Asp55 has only 50% binding affinity compared with Fab with Asn.
 23
Heavy chain CDR2 No impact on potency for fraction with lower level of Asn55 deamidation 17
Open in a new tab

Structural and functional effects have also been assessed using total acidic regions without separating into fractions with one particular modification enriched. The acidic fractions of a recombinant IgG1 mAb containing 29% sialic acid,17% glycation, 7% non-reducible species, 29% reduced disulfide bonds and18% deamidation in the Fc region have a slightly lower binding response to FcRn, but have similar in vivo PK in rats as the main peak materials lacking these modifications.14 On one hand, these results demonstrate that various multiple modifications to such levels may not have substantial effects on potency and in vivo PK and therefore may not be a concern for the development. On the other hand, these results also demonstrate the need to collect fractions that are enriched with one particular modification in order to clearly detect the potential difference between antibodies with or without such a modification.

Basic Species

Basic species are defined as the materials that elute later than the main peak during CEX and earlier than the main peak during AEX analyses. Modifications that result in the generation of basic species are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Modifications that form basic species.

Basic species References
C-terminal Lys
 1,3,14,17-20,22,24,47,50
N-terminal Glu
 3,17,26,51
Isomerization of Asp
 2
Succinimide
 2,23,56,57
Met oxidation
 25,58,59
Amidation
 60,61
Incomplete disulfide bonds
 51
Incomplete removal of leader sequence
 14,17,61
Mutation from Ser to Arg
 26,62
Aglycosylation
 63
Fragments
 25
Aggregates 14,36
Open in a new tab

One major reason for the formation of basic species is incomplete removal of C-terminal Lys. MAbs with heavy chain C-terminal Lys are more basic than the main species due to the additional positive charges.1,3,14,17-20,22,24,47,50 Because carboxypeptidase B (CPB) can specifically remove C-terminal basic amino acid residues, comparison of the chromatograms of antibodies before and after CPB digestion can clearly demonstrate the contribution of C-terminal Lys to the formation of basic species.

Another common modification that contributes to basic species is incomplete cyclization of the N-terminal glutamine (Gln) to pyroGlu of the light chain or heavy chain or both. The Gln is originally encoded in the genes, but it can undergo a spontaneous reaction to result in pyroGlu. Antibodies with the original Gln have a higher apparent pI than the main species and are therefore referred to as basic species.3,17,26,51

Isomerization of Asp to isoAsp has been reported widely.2,33,52-55 Similar to deamidation, isomerization occurs frequently in the CDR regions2,52-55 and rarely in the constant regions.33 When analyzed by CEX, a recombinant mAb with isoAsp102 in the CDR3 of heavy chain elutes later than the antibody with the original Asp.2 This later elution of antibody containing isoAsp compared with antibody containing Asp has also been observed for antibodies containing either isoAsp or Asp as Asn deamidation products.27 Isomerization of the Asp in the constant region has also been reported,33 but its relationship to basic species in unclear.

Succinimide, which is the common intermediate for Asn deamidation and Asp isomerization, can also contribute to the generation of basic species.23,53-56 Recombinant mAbs with succinimide in the CDR regions as the Asp isomerization product elute later than antibodies with Asp at the same positions from CEX.2,56 An antibody with succinimide 55 as Asn deamidation product in the CDR2 of heavy chain elutes in the basic region on CEX.23 The presence of succinimide 74 as an Asp isomerization product, which is outside of the CDR regions, also results in the formation of basic species.57 Succinimide as an deamidation intermediate has also been detected at position 384 in amino acid sequence SN(384)GOPEN(389)N(390)YK and in the peptide LNGK of the constant domains;32 however, the elution position relative to the original antibody is unclear.

Although not widely observed, several other modifications have also been reported to generate basic species. Antibodies with oxidization of the two conserved methionine (Met) residues in the Fc region elute in the basic region when analyzed by CEX.25,58 Oxidization of a Met residue in the CDR2 regions of a recombinant mAb also results in the generation of basic species as evidenced by an earlier elution from an AEX column.59 Amidation of the proline residue after removal of the heavy chain C-terminal Lys and the preceding glycine residue results in the formation of basic species.60,61 The last three amino acids of antibody heavy chain are PGK, which fits the enzymatic amidation consensus sequence of XGB where X is the target amidated residue and B is a basic amino acid. Therefore, amidation may be a much more common modification for recombinant mAbs, although maybe to a very limited extent in many cases. A recombinant mAb with unformed disulfide bond in the heavy chain variable domain elutes later than the antibody with complete disulfide bond from a CEX column and thus represents a basic species.51 Antibody variants with incomplete removal of the signal peptides elute in the basic region.14,17,61 However, this observation may not be generalized because the elution of antibodies with or without signal peptides may highly depend on the nature of the amino acid in the signal peptide. Recombinant mAbs with a single amino acid mutation from serine to arginine in the light chains26 or in the Fc region of the heavy chain elute as basic species from CEX columns.62 An antibody with one aglycosylated heavy chain and one heavy chain with short oligosaccharides elutes as basic species from CEX as well.63 A non-covalent Fab-Fab dimer elutes later than Fab monomer from a WCX-10 column.47 Antibody aggregates14,36 and fragments25 have been detected as basic species. Because fragments are also enriched as acidic species, the nature of charges of the fragments could play a critical role in affecting their elution order by chromatography.

Impact on structure, stability and functions

Similar to the discussion regarding the acidic species, the locations of modifications that form basic species are critical to whether or not the modifications have any effect on the structure, stability and biological functions. Modifications of either N-termini or C-termini of antibodies are not expected to have substantial affects on antibody structure, stability and functions because these regions are highly exposed and not part of any ligand binding sites. There is no difference in the potency between antibodies with two heavy chain N-terminal pyroGlu compared with the same antibody with one pyroGlu and one Gln.17 The presence of N-terminal leader sequence of various lengths also does not affect potency.17 C-terminal Lys did not affect thermal stability of a recombinant IgG1 antibody64 nor the potency of another antibody mediated by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC).22 Amidation of the C-terminal proline residue after removal of Lys and Gly has no affect on antigen binding or Fc effector functions.60 Basic species of an IgG1 antibody composed of 85% C-terminal Lys and 15% leader sequence in the light chain demonstrate similar potency, FcRn binding affinity and PK in rats.14

In contrast to modifications on the N-terminal or C-terminal regions, modifications in other regions are more likely have a substantial affect on structure, stability and biological functions. A Fab with unpaired disulfide bonds is only ~28% as potent as the Fab containing the fully formed disulfide bond.65 An isolated fraction containing antibody with isoAsp102 as an isomerization product was found to be only 9–21% as potent as the main peak fraction containing the original Asp102 residue.2 The effect of formation of isoAsp has also been studied using fractions collected from hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) separation of a recombinant mAb. Fab fragments with isoAsp32 in the CDR1 of the light chain had 13% relative binding affinity53 and were ~23% as potent65 as the Fab with the original Asp32 residue (136% for the peak with the original Asp and 30% for the peak with isoAsp32), while Fab’(2) with isoAsp32 on one light chain had 42% binding activity compared with Fab’(2) with Asp32.53 Several studies have demonstrated the effect of succinimide formation on antigen binding affinity and potency. A Fab fragment containing succinimide 55 in the heavy chain CDR2 showed a 50% decrease in the binding affinity compared with a Fab with the original Asn residue, and the antibody with succinimide showed a 70% decrease in potency compared with the antibody with the original Asn.23 A Fab with succinimide 32 in the light chain CDR1 had 16% binding affinity53 and ~42% potency (136% for the peak with Asp and 56% for the peak with succinimide).65 Fab’(2) with succinimide 32 in the CDR1 of one or both light chains had 51% and 22% binding affinity compared with Fab’(2) with the original Asp.53 In contrast, an IgG2 antibody with succinimide 30 in the light chain CDR1 only showed a 10–20% decrease compared with the antibody with Asp30, a difference that was within the assay variability.56

Oxidation of Met residues in the Fc region did not affect antigen binding and potency for a recombinant mAb;43 however, it did cause conformational changes mainly in the CH2 domain and resulted in decreased thermal stability and increased propensity to aggregate.66 Since the two Met oxidations are located close to the binding sites of multiple ligands, oxidation of these residues decreases binding to protein A, protein G and FcRn, but has only a minimal affect on Fcγ receptor binding.67-69 In addition, oxidation of these Met residues resulted in a significant reduction in in vivo half-life.70 Oxidization of Met residues in the heavy chain CDR2 regions resulted in decreased thermal stability of the antibody as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).59

Strategy for Characterization of Acidic Species and Basic Species

Although fraction collection is almost always the first step toward a thorough characterization of acidic and basic species, it may be beneficial to determine the contribution of sialic acid to the acidic species and C-terminal Lys to the basic species by enzymatic digestion prior to fraction collection. Both sialic acid and C-terminal Lys can be specifically removed by enzymatic digestion under native conditions that will not substantially affect antibody structures. Sialic acid alone can be readily removed using sialidase or with the entire N-linked oligosaccharides using PNGaseF. C-terminal Lys can be readily removed by CPB digestion. Comparison of the percentage of acidic or basic species after these enzymatic treatments will determine the contribution of these modifications to the total of acidic or basic species. If an antibody has a substantial amount of C-terminal Lys, acidic species and basic species associated with the antibody with various numbers of C-terminal Lys will overlap substantially. Thus, treatment with CPB will be necessary to collect fractions that will be enriched with specific type of modifications.

Fractions are typically collected based on the identifiable peaks. There are cases where several low abundant peaks are grouped as one fraction to obtain enough material for further characterization, but it is highly desirable to collect finer fractions because a single peak on a chromatogram may be a result of multiple modifications. Further fractionation using different separation methods is also useful to obtain materials with modifications that are enriched to the level that can be characterized. Further analysis of Fab and Fc fragments obtained from enzymatic digestion can help to localize the acidic or basic species that are either associated with Fab or Fc.

In many cases, stressed samples are used to generate higher levels of acidic or basic species for fraction collection. The data are then extrapolated to determine the nature of the acidic and basic species that are present to an extremely low level in the unstressed drug substance. The observation that the acidic species and basic species in the drug substance and in the stressed sample have the same retention times, however, may not be sufficient to support the conclusion that they are formed due to the same modifications. Further evidence is usually needed to confirm that acidic species and basic species generated at different conditions are the same in nature. Even if the nature of the modifications is the same, the underlined mechanisms may be different. For example, the oxidation of Met256 and Met432 is coupled. Either both residues are oxidized or neither of them is oxidized on one or both heavy chains in drug substance25 and under accelerated stability conditions.58 However, commonly used chemical oxidization using tBHP resulted in random oxidation of the two Met residues on the two heavy chains.58 In another example, only Asp30 of the light chain was observed as the deamidation product in a drug substance, while both Asp and isoAsp was observed in the accelerated stability sample.2

Controlling the levels of analytical artifacts is also critical to the characterization of acidic and basic species. Artifacts can be easily introduced during fraction collection and preparation of samples for detailed analysis. First, exposure of the fractions to various pH, agitation, room temperature, and freeze/thaw cycles cannot be completely avoided during fraction collection, concentration, buffer exchange and storage. Modifications such as aggregation, oxidization and deamidation can thus be generated as artifacts. Use of the main peak and the starting material before and after going through similar steps as assay controls is always a good idea. The purity and quality of the collected acidic and basic species also needs to be ensured before carrying out any further studies, including in vitro and in vivo functional assays. Second, artifacts such as deamidation, oxidation and cyclization of N-terminal Gln can occur during sample preparations for analysis. It is always a good practice to include the main peak as a control and carry out side-by-side characterization with the fractions of acidic and basic species. Modifications can also be lost during sample preparation. The formation of succinimide results in a molecular weight decrease of 17 Da if it is an Asn deamidation intermediate or 18 Da if it is an Asp isomerization product. However, succinimide is not stable under typical denaturation, reduction, alkylation and enzymatic digestion conditions used for generating peptides for LC-MS analysis. Similarly, cysteinylation cannot endure the reduction step used for sample preparations for LC-MS analysis. In cases of the loss of modifications during sample preparations, including the main species as a control does not provide much help. Rather, broad knowledge of protein modifications in general and an understanding of the limitations of the sample preparation procedures are very helpful.

Conclusions

Acidic and basic species are commonly observed when recombinant mAbs are produced. Complete elimination of acidic and basic species is unrealistic and unnecessary. There are a few modifications that are probably unique to recombinant mAbs that are either associated with the specific host expression systems (e.g., modification by maleuric acid in goat milk) or occur during the production and formulation (e.g., modification by thiosulfide). Most of the modifications, however, have either been detected or are expected to be present in endogenous human IgG molecules, suggesting a much lower risk as a safety concern. The impact on biological functions is highly dependent on the sites and levels of modifications. For modifications that are localized in the Fc regions, even the presence of higher levels may not have direct effects on the binding affinity. Similarly, modifications that are localized in the Fab regions may not affect Fc-related functions such as receptor binding. The level of modification is also important regarding whether or not there is an effect. For example, the lower level of deamidation of Asn55 in the heavy chain CDR region does not affect the potency of one antibody,17 but the presence of isoAsp55 or Asp55 in one heavy chain decreases the potency of another antibody to only 20%.23 Of course, the different effects of deamidation on the two antibodies could be due to their interactions with different antigens, but the percentage of deamidation most likely also plays a role.

Many of the modifications leading to their formation have been identified by analyzing acidic and basic fractions collected mainly from chromatography-based methods. There are cases where the acidic and basic species have been fully characterized and can be accounted for by the identified modifications. In many cases, though, fully understanding the nature of acidic species and basic species may still be challenging. Under all circumstances, it is necessary to assess the differences between the acidic or basic species and the main peak with regard to stability and functions. Modifications are likely either critical quality attributes (CQAs) or key process attributes (KPAs). Therefore, information of acidic and basic species is critical to establish comparability and similarity with the ultimate goal to ensure efficacy and safety of therapeutic recombinant mAbs.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Perkins M, Theiler R, Lunte S, Jeschke M. Determination of the origin of charge heterogeneity in a murine monoclonal antibody. Pharm Res. 2000;17:1110–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1026461830617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harris RJ, Kabakoff B, Macchi FD, Shen FJ, Kwong M, Andya JD, et al. Identification of multiple sources of charge heterogeneity in a recombinant antibody. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001;752:233–45. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00548-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moorhouse KG, Nashabeh W, Deveney J, Bjork NS, Mulkerrin MG, Ryskamp T. Validation of an HPLC method for the analysis of the charge heterogeneity of the recombinant monoclonal antibody IDEC-C2B8 after papain digestion. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1997;16:593–603. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(97)00178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Triguero D, Buciak JB, Yang J, Pardridge WM. Blood-brain barrier transport of cationized immunoglobulin G: enhanced delivery compared to native protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:4761–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pardridge WM, Bickel U, Buciak J, Yang J, Diagne A, Aepinus C. Cationization of a monoclonal antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus REV protein enhances cellular uptake but does not impair antigen binding of the antibody. Immunol Lett. 1994;42:191–5. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(94)90085-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pardridge WM, Kang YS, Diagne A, Zack JA. Cationized hyperimmune immunoglobulins: pharmacokinetics, toxicity evaluation and treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-infected human-peripheral blood lymphocytes-severe combined immune deficiency mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;276:246–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hong G, Bazin-Redureau MI, Scherrmann JM. Pharmacokinetics and organ distribution of cationized colchicine-specific IgG and Fab fragments in rat. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:147–53. doi: 10.1021/js970335n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rodwell JD, Alvarez VL, Lee C, Lopes AD, Goers JW, King HD, et al. Site-specific covalent modification of monoclonal antibodies: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2632–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gangopadhyay A, Petrick AT, Thomas P. Modification of antibody isoelectric point affects biodistribution of 111-indium-labeled antibody. Nucl Med Biol. 1996;23:257–61. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(95)02057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khawli LA, Mizokami MM, Sharifi J, Hu P, Epstein AL. Pharmacokinetic characteristics and biodistribution of radioiodinated chimeric TNT-1, -2, and -3 monoclonal antibodies after chemical modification with biotin. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2002;17:359–70. doi: 10.1089/108497802760363150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee HJ, Pardridge WM. Monoclonal antibody radiopharmaceuticals: cationization, pegylation, radiometal chelation, pharmacokinetics, and tumor imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2003;14:546–53. doi: 10.1021/bc0256648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perera RM, Zoncu R, Johns TG, Pypaert M, Lee FT, Mellman I, et al. Internalization, intracellular trafficking, and biodistribution of monoclonal antibody 806: a novel anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody. Neoplasia. 2007;9:1099–110. doi: 10.1593/neo.07721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khawli LA, Glasky MS, Alauddin MM, Epstein AL. Improved tumor localization and radioimaging with chemically modified monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 1996;11:203–15. doi: 10.1089/cbr.1996.11.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khawli LA, Goswami S, Hutchinson R, Kwong ZW, Yang J, Wang X, et al. Charge variants in IgG1: Isolation, characterization, in vitro binding properties and pharmacokinetics in rats. MAbs. 2010;2:613–24. doi: 10.4161/mabs.2.6.13333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vlasak J, Ionescu R. Heterogeneity of monoclonal antibodies revealed by charge-sensitive methods. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008;9:468–81. doi: 10.2174/138920108786786402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu H, Gaza-Bulseco G, Faldu D, Chumsae C, Sun J. Heterogeneity of monoclonal antibodies. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:2426–47. doi: 10.1002/jps.21180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lyubarskaya Y, Houde D, Woodard J, Murphy D, Mhatre R. Analysis of recombinant monoclonal antibody isoforms by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry as a strategy for streamlining characterization of recombinant monoclonal antibody charge heterogeneity. Anal Biochem. 2006;348:24–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beck A, Bussat MC, Zorn N, Robillard V, Klinguer-Hamour C, Chenu S, et al. Characterization by liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry of monoclonal anti-IGF-1 receptor antibodies produced in CHO and NS0 cells. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005;819:203–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harris RJ. Processing of C-terminal lysine and arginine residues of proteins isolated from mammalian cell culture. J Chromatogr A. 1995;705:129–34. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01255-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Santora LC, Krull IS, Grant K. Characterization of recombinant human monoclonal tissue necrosis factor-alpha antibody using cation-exchange HPLC and capillary isoelectric focusing. Anal Biochem. 1999;275:98–108. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santora LC, Stanley K, Krull IS, Grant K. Characterization of maleuric acid derivatives on transgenic human monoclonal antibody due to post-secretional modifications in goat milk. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20:843–56. doi: 10.1002/bmc.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Antes B, Amon S, Rizzi A, Wiederkum S, Kainer M, Szolar O, et al. Analysis of lysine clipping of a humanized Lewis-Y specific IgG antibody and its relation to Fc-mediated effector function. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007;852:250–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yan B, Steen S, Hambly D, Valliere-Douglass J, Vanden Bos T, Smallwood S, et al. Succinimide formation at Asn 55 in the complementarity determining region of a recombinant monoclonal antibody IgG1 heavy chain. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:3509–21. doi: 10.1002/jps.21655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weitzhandler M, Farnan D, Horvath J, Rohrer JS, Slingsby RW, Avdalovic N, et al. Protein variant separations by cation-exchange chromatography on tentacle-type polymeric stationary phases. J Chromatogr A. 1998;828:365–72. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00521-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang T, Bourret J, Cano T. Isolation and characterization of therapeutic antibody charge variants using cation exchange displacement chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:5079–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alvarez M, Tremintin G, Wang J, Eng M, Kao YH, Jeong J, et al. On-line characterization of monoclonal antibody variants by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry operating in a two-dimensional format. Anal Biochem. 2011;419:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vlasak J, Bussat MC, Wang S, Wagner-Rousset E, Schaefer M, Klinguer-Hamour C, et al. Identification and characterization of asparagine deamidation in the light chain CDR1 of a humanized IgG1 antibody. Anal Biochem. 2009;392:145–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang L, Lu J, Wroblewski VJ, Beals JM, Riggin RM. In vivo deamidation characterization of monoclonal antibody by LC/MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2005;77:1432–9. doi: 10.1021/ac0494174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zheng JY, Janis LJ. Influence of pH, buffer species, and storage temperature on physicochemical stability of a humanized monoclonal antibody LA298. Int J Pharm. 2006;308:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim J, Jones L, Taylor L, Kannan G, Jackson F, Lau H, et al. Characterization of a unique IgG1 mAb CEX profile by limited Lys-C proteolysis/CEX separation coupled with mass spectrometry and structural analysis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878:1973–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harris R, Shire SJ, Winter C. Commercial manufacturing scale formulation and analytical characterization of therapeutic recombinant antibodies. Drug Dev Res. 2004;61:137–54. doi: 10.1002/ddr.10344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chelius D, Rehder DS, Bondarenko PV. Identification and characterization of deamidation sites in the conserved regions of human immunoglobulin gamma antibodies. Anal Chem. 2005;77:6004–11. doi: 10.1021/ac050672d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Terashima I, Koga A, Nagai H. Identification of deamidation and isomerization sites on pharmaceutical recombinant antibody using H(2)(18)O. Anal Biochem. 2007;368:49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gaza-Bulseco G, Li B, Bulseco A, Liu HC. Method to differentiate asn deamidation that occurred prior to and during sample preparation of a monoclonal antibody. Anal Chem. 2008;80:9491–8. doi: 10.1021/ac801617u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sinha S, Zhang L, Duan S, Williams TD, Vlasak J, Ionescu R, et al. Effect of protein structure on deamidation rate in the Fc fragment of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody. Protein Sci. 2009;18:1573–84. doi: 10.1002/pro.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gandhi S, Ren D, Xiao G, Bondarenko P, Sloey C, Ricci MS, et al. Elucidation of degradants in acidic peak of cation exchange chromatography in an IgG1 monoclonal antibody formed on long-term storage in a liquid formulation. Pharm Res. 2012;29:209–24. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0536-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang L, Amphlett G, Lambert JM, Blättler W, Zhang W. Structural characterization of a recombinant monoclonal antibody by electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Pharm Res. 2005;22:1338–49. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-5267-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mukherjee R, Adhikary L, Khedkar A, Iyer H. Probing deamidation in therapeutic immunoglobulin gamma (IgG1) by ‘bottom-up’ mass spectrometry with electron transfer dissociation. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2010;24:879–84. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang W, Czupryn MJ. Analysis of isoaspartate in a recombinant monoclonal antibody and its charge isoforms. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;30:1479–90. doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00479-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wypych J, Li M, Guo A, Zhang Z, Martinez T, Allen MJ, et al. Human IgG2 antibodies display disulfide-mediated structural isoforms. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16194–205. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709987200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martinez T, Guo A, Allen MJ, Han M, Pace D, Jones J, et al. Disulfide connectivity of human immunoglobulin G2 structural isoforms. Biochemistry. 2008;47:7496–508. doi: 10.1021/bi800576c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pristatsky P, Cohen SL, Krantz D, Acevedo J, Ionescu R, Vlasak J. Evidence for trisulfide bonds in a recombinant variant of a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6148–55. doi: 10.1021/ac9006254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lam XM, Yang JY, Cleland JL. Antioxidants for prevention of methionine oxidation in recombinant monoclonal antibody HER2. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86:1250–5. doi: 10.1021/js970143s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Banks DD, Hambly DM, Scavezze JL, Siska CC, Stackhouse NL, Gadgil HS. The effect of sucrose hydrolysis on the stability of protein therapeutics during accelerated formulation studies. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:4501–10. doi: 10.1002/jps.21749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miller AK, Hambly DM, Kerwin BA, Treuheit MJ, Gadgil HS. Characterization of site-specific glycation during process development of a human therapeutic monoclonal antibody. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100:2543–50. doi: 10.1002/jps.22504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Quan C, Alcala E, Petkovska I, Matthews D, Canova-Davis E, Taticek R, et al. A study in glycation of a therapeutic recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody: where it is, how it got there, and how it affects charge-based behavior. Anal Biochem. 2008;373:179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lau H, Pace D, Yan B, McGrath T, Smallwood S, Patel K, et al. Investigation of degradation processes in IgG1 monoclonal antibodies by limited proteolysis coupled with weak cation-exchange HPLC. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878:868–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Banks DD, Gadgil HS, Pipes GD, Bondarenko PV, Hobbs V, Scavezze JL, et al. Removal of cysteinylation from an unpaired sulfhydryl in the variable region of a recombinant monoclonal IgG1 antibody improves homogeneity, stability, and biological activity. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:775–90. doi: 10.1002/jps.21014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dillon TM, Ricci MS, Vezina C, Flynn GC, Liu YD, Rehder DS, et al. Structural and functional characterization of disulfide isoforms of the human IgG2 subclass. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:16206–15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709988200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dick LW, Jr., Qiu D, Mahon D, Adamo M, Cheng KC. C-terminal lysine variants in fully human monoclonal antibodies: investigation of test methods and possible causes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;100:1132–43. doi: 10.1002/bit.21855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ouellette D, Alessandri L, Chin A, Grinnell C, Tarcsa E, Radziejewski C, et al. Studies in serum support rapid formation of disulfide bond between unpaired cysteine residues in the VH domain of an immunoglobulin G1 molecule. Anal Biochem. 2010;397:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wakankar AA, Borchardt RT, Eigenbrot C, Shia S, Wang YJ, Shire SJ, et al. Aspartate isomerization in the complementarity-determining regions of two closely related monoclonal antibodies. Biochemistry. 2007;46:1534–44. doi: 10.1021/bi061500t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cacia J, Keck R, Presta LG, Frenz J. Isomerization of an aspartic acid residue in the complementarity-determining regions of a recombinant antibody to human IgE: identification and effect on binding affinity. Biochemistry. 1996;35:1897–903. doi: 10.1021/bi951526c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang HZ, Nichols A, Liu D. Direct identification and quantification of aspartyl succinimide in an IgG2 mAb by RapiGest assisted digestion. Anal Chem. 2009;81:1686–92. doi: 10.1021/ac802708s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xiao G, Bondarenko PV, Jacob J, Chu GC, Chelius D. 18O labeling method for identification and quantification of succinimide in proteins. Anal Chem. 2007;79:2714–21. doi: 10.1021/ac0617870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chu GC, Chelius D, Xiao G, Khor HK, Coulibaly S, Bondarenko PV. Accumulation of succinimide in a recombinant monoclonal antibody in mildly acidic buffers under elevated temperatures. Pharm Res. 2007;24:1145–56. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9241-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sreedhara A, Cordoba A, Zhu Q, Kwong J, Liu J. Characterization of the isomerization products of aspartate residues at two different sites in a monoclonal antibody. Pharm Res. 2012;29:187–97. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0534-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chumsae C, Gaza-Bulseco G, Sun J, Liu H. Comparison of methionine oxidation in thermal stability and chemically stressed samples of a fully human monoclonal antibody. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007;850:285–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Teshima G, Li MX, Danishmand R, Obi C, To R, Huang C, et al. Separation of oxidized variants of a monoclonal antibody by anion-exchange. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:2091–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Johnson KA, Paisley-Flango K, Tangarone BS, Porter TJ, Rouse JC. Cation exchange-HPLC and mass spectrometry reveal C-terminal amidation of an IgG1 heavy chain. Anal Biochem. 2007;360:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kaschak T, Boyd D, Lu F, Derfus G, Kluck B, Nogal B, et al. Characterization of the basic charge variants of a human IgG1: effect of copper concentration in cell culture media. MAbs. 2011;3:577–83. doi: 10.4161/mabs.3.6.17959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ren D, Zhang J, Pritchett R, Liu H, Kyauk J, Luo J, et al. Detection and identification of a serine to arginine sequence variant in a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879:2877–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gaza-Bulseco G, Bulseco A, Chumsae C, Liu H. Characterization of the glycosylation state of a recombinant monoclonal antibody using weak cation exchange chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008;862:155–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu H, Bulseco GG, Sun J. Effect of posttranslational modifications on the thermal stability of a recombinant monoclonal antibody. Immunol Lett. 2006;106:144–53. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2006.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Harris RJ. Heterogeneity of recombinant antibodies: linking structure to function. Dev Biol (Basel) 2005;122:117–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu D, Ren D, Huang H, Dankberg J, Rosenfeld R, Cocco MJ, et al. Structure and stability changes of human IgG1 Fc as a consequence of methionine oxidation. Biochemistry. 2008;47:5088–100. doi: 10.1021/bi702238b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bertolotti-Ciarlet A, Wang W, Lownes R, Pristatsky P, Fang Y, McKelvey T, et al. Impact of methionine oxidation on the binding of human IgG1 to Fc Rn and Fc gamma receptors. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:1878–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pan H, Chen K, Chu L, Kinderman F, Apostol I, Huang G. Methionine oxidation in human IgG2 Fc decreases binding affinities to protein A and FcRn. Protein Sci. 2009;18:424–33. doi: 10.1002/pro.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gaza-Bulseco G, Faldu S, Hurkmans K, Chumsae C, Liu H. Effect of methionine oxidation of a recombinant monoclonal antibody on the binding affinity to protein A and protein G. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008;870:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.05.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang W, Vlasak J, Li Y, Pristatsky P, Fang Y, Pittman T, et al. Impact of methionine oxidation in human IgG1 Fc on serum half-life of monoclonal antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:860–6. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mAbs are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES