Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Aug;77(8):4880–4884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4880

Control of gene expression by a mobile recombinational switch.

D E Berg
PMCID: PMC349952  PMID: 6254046

Abstract

Transposable recombinational switches may play important roles in the evolution of bacterial populations by increasing flexibility in the control of expression of particular genes and thereby maintaining heterogeneity in clones of cells growing in a uniform environment. Experiments reported here show that Tn5-112, a deletion derivative of kanamycin-resistance transposon Tn5, can function as such a mobile recombinational switch. The internal deletion in Tn5-112 removes transcription termination signals and permits transcription initiated within the element to continue into nearby bacterial genes. Consequently, in one orientation Tn5-112 stimulates distal gene expression, whereas in the other orientation the normal polarity imposed by wild-type Tn5 intervenes and distal gene expression is not stimulated. Because Tn5-112 contains terminal inverted repeats, intramolecular recombination can invert the Tn5-112 element and alter gene expression. Tn5-112 is transposition deficient. Its mobility derives from the recessive nature of the transposition deficiency and, in this study, from the possibility of homologous recombination which permits its placement in either orientation at any site occupied by nother Tn5 element.

Full text

PDF
4881

Images in this article

4883Image
on p.4883
4883Image
on p.4883

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg D. E., Weiss A., Crossland L. Polarity of Tn5 insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1980 May;142(2):439–446. doi: 10.1128/jb.142.2.439-446.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calos M. P., Johnsrud L., Miller J. H. DNA sequence at the integration sites of the insertion element IS1. Cell. 1978 Mar;13(3):411–418. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90315-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow L. T., Davidson N. Electron microscope study of the structures of lambdadv DNAs. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jun 15;86(1):69–89. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(74)80008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drake J. W. The length of the homologous pairing region for genetic recombination in bacteriophage T4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Sep;58(3):962–966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.3.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jorgensen R. A., Rothstein S. J., Reznikoff W. S. A restriction enzyme cleavage map of Tn5 and location of a region encoding neomycin resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1979;177(1):65–72. doi: 10.1007/BF00267254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamp D., Kahmann R., Zipser D., Broker T. R., Chow L. T. Inversion of the G DNA segment of phage Mu controls phage infectivity. Nature. 1978 Feb 9;271(5645):577–580. doi: 10.1038/271577a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MCCLINTOCK B. Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1956;21:197–216. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCLINTOCK B. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:13–47. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meyer R., Boch G., Shapiro J. Transposition of DNA inserted into deletions of the Tn5 kanamycin resistance element. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Mar 9;171(1):7–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00274009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Murray K., Murray N. E. Phage lambda receptor chromosomes for DNA fragments made with restriction endonuclease III of Haemophilus influenzae and restriction endonuclease I of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):551–564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ptashne M., Jeffrey A., Johnson A. D., Maurer R., Meyer B. J., Pabo C. O., Roberts T. M., Sauer R. T. How the lambda repressor and cro work. Cell. 1980 Jan;19(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90383-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saedler H., Reif H. J., Hu S., Davidson N. IS2, a genetic element for turn-off and turn-on of gene activity in E. coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1974;132(4):265–289. doi: 10.1007/BF00268569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Silverman M., Zieg J., Hilmen M., Simon M. Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):391–395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Silverman M., Zieg J., Simon M. Flagellar-phase variation: isolation of the rh1 gene. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jan;137(1):517–523. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.1.517-523.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spiegelman W. G. Two states of expression of genes cl, rex, and N in lambda. Virology. 1971 Jan;43(1):16–33. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Starlinger P., Saedler H. IS-elements in microorganisms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1976;75:111–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-66530-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van de Putte P., Cramer S., Giphart-Gassler M. Invertible DNA determines host specificity of bacteriophage mu. Nature. 1980 Jul 17;286(5770):218–222. doi: 10.1038/286218a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES