Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Aug;77(8):4953–4956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4953

Blockade of recruitment of ovarian follicles by suppression of the secondary surge of follicle-stimulating hormone with porcine follicular field.

D C Hoak, N B Schwartz
PMCID: PMC349967  PMID: 6776533

Abstract

The increased serum concentration of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; follitropin) between proestrus and estrus in the rat has been hypothesized to recruit the follicles destined to ovulate in the next cycle. Injection of porcine follicular fluid (PFF) late in proestrus suppresses the secondary FSH surge; injection early in proestrus suppresses the primary FSH surge without affecting the secondary FSH surge. Thus, it is possible to use PFF to test the FSH/follicular recruitment hypothesis and to distinguish between the contributions of the primary and secondary FSH surges to this recruitment. The normal recruitment of follicles occurs in the diameter range 350-499 microns between the day of proestrus and the day of estrus. When the secondary FSH surge was suppressed by injection of PFF late in proestrus, PFF, but not porcine serum (PS), blocked follicular recruitmenet into size groups of 350-499 microns on the morning of estrus. The number of ova ovulated did not differ between PFF- and PS-treated animals. When we suppressed only the primary FSH surge, by injecting PFF early in proestrus, there were no differences between PFF- and PS-treated animals in the number of ova ovulated, follicle size distribution, or hormones. In the last experiment, the secondary FSH surge was blocked with PFF but was replaced with exogenous ovine FSH which caused a dose-related increase in follicular recruitment, substantiating the interpretation that the follicular fluid suppressed recruitment by suppressing FSH secretion. Thus, in mammals with short reproductive cycles, the gonadotropin surges provide a "fail-safe" mechanism whereby luteinizing hormone triggers ovulation, thus ending one cycle, and the secondary increase in FSH levels recruits follicles for the next cycle.

Full text

PDF
4953

Images in this article

4954Image
on p.4954
4954Image
on p.4954
4954Image
on p.4954
4954Image
on p.4954
4955Image
on p.4955

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashiru O. A., Blake C. A. Stimulation of endogenous follicle-stimulating hormone release during estrus by exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone or luteinizing hormone at proestrus in the phenobarbital-blocked rat. Endocrinology. 1979 Nov;105(5):1162–1167. doi: 10.1210/endo-105-5-1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butcher R. L., Collins W. E., Fugo N. W. Plasma concentration of LH, FSH, prolactin, progesterone and estradiol-17beta throughout the 4-day estrous cycle of the rat. Endocrinology. 1974 Jun;94(6):1704–1708. doi: 10.1210/endo-94-6-1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell C. S., Schwartz N. B., Firlit M. G. The role of adrenal and ovarian steroids in the control of serum LH and FSH. Endocrinology. 1977 Jul;101(1):162–172. doi: 10.1210/endo-101-1-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell C. S., Schwartz N. B. Time course of serum FSH suppression in ovariectomized rats injected with porcine follicular fluid (folliculostatin): effect of estradiol treatment. Biol Reprod. 1979 Jun;20(5):1093–1098. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod20.5.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chappel S. C., Selker F. Relation between the secretion of FSH during the periovulatory period and ovulation during the next cycle. Biol Reprod. 1979 Sep;21(2):347–352. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod21.2.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DePaolo L. V., Shander D., Wise P. M., Barraclough C. A., Channing C. P. Identification of inhibin-like activity in ovarian venous plasma of rats during the estrous cycle. Endocrinology. 1979 Sep;105(3):647–654. doi: 10.1210/endo-105-3-647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DePaolo L. V., Wise P. M., Anderson L. D., Barraclough C. A., Channing C. P. Suppression of the pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone secretion during proestrus and estrus in rats by porcine follicular fluid: possible site of action. Endocrinology. 1979 Feb;104(2):402–408. doi: 10.1210/endo-104-2-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirshfield A. N., Midgley A. R., Jr The role of FSH in the selection of large ovarian follicles in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1978 Oct;19(3):606–611. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod19.3.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoffmann J. C., Lorenzen J. R., Weil T., Schwartz N. B. Selective suppression of the primary surge of follicle-stimulating hormone in the rat: further evidence for folliculostatin in porcine follicular fluid. Endocrinology. 1979 Jul;105(1):200–203. doi: 10.1210/endo-105-1-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ledwitz-Rigby F., Rigby B. W., Gay V. L., Stetson M., Young J., Channing C. P. Inhibitory action of porcine follicular fluid upon granulosa cell luteinization in vitro: assay and influence of follicular maturation. J Endocrinol. 1977 Aug;74(2):175–184. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0740175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lorenzen J. R., Channing C. P., Schwartz N. B. Partial characterization of FSH suppressing activity (folliculostatin) in porcine follicular fluid using the metestrous rat as an in vivo bioassay model. Biol Reprod. 1978 Oct;19(3):635–640. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod19.3.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McClintock J. A., Schwartz N. B. Changes in pituitary and plasma follicle stimulating hormone concentrations during the rat estrous cycle. Endocrinology. 1968 Sep;83(3):433–441. doi: 10.1210/endo-83-3-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nequin L. G., Alvarez J., Schwartz N. B. Measurement of serum steroid and gonadotropin levels and uterine and ovarian variables throughout 4 day and 5 day estrous cycles in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1979 Apr;20(3):659–670. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod20.3.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peppler R. D., Greenwald G. S. Influence of unilateral ovariectomy on follicular development in cycling rats. Am J Anat. 1970 Jan;127(1):9–14. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001270103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Savoy-Moore R. T., Schwartz N. B. DIFFERENTIAL CONTROL OF FSH and LH secretion. Int Rev Physiol. 1980;22:203–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz N. B., Channing C. P. Evidence for ovarian "inhibin": suppression of the secondary rise in serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in proestrous rats by injection of porcine follicular fluid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5721–5724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz N. B., Talley W. L. Effects of exogenous LH or FSH on endogenous FSH, progesterone and estradiol secretion. Biol Reprod. 1978 Jun;18(5):820–828. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod18.5.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwartz N. B. The role of FSH and LH and of their antibodies on follicle growth and on ovulation. Biol Reprod. 1974 Mar;10(2):236–272. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod10.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsafriri A., Pomerantz S. H., Channing C. P. Inhibition of oocyte maturation by porcine follicular fluid: partial characterization of the inhibitor. Biol Reprod. 1976 Jun;14(5):511–516. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod14.5.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Welschen R., Dullaart J. Administration of antiserum against ovine follicle-stimulating hormone or ovine luteinizing hormone at pro-poestrus in the rat: effects on follicular development during the oncoming cycle. J Endocrinol. 1976 Aug;70(2):301–306. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0700301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES