Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Dec;77(12):7497–7500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7497

A species near its equilibrium size in a fluctuating environment can evolve a lower intrinsic rate of increase

David G Heckel 1, Jonathan Roughgarden 1
PMCID: PMC350532  PMID: 16592938

Abstract

In one specific model of a density-regulated population undergoing natural selection in a fluctuating environment there is a systematic evolutionary pressure favoring a lower intrinsic rate of increase, which can sometimes even overcome an evolutionary pressure favoring a higher carrying capacity.

Keywords: density-dependent selection, evolutionary ecology, stochastic environments

Full text

PDF
7499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gillespie J. H. A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. V. The SAS--CFF model. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Aug;14(1):1–45. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ginzburg L. R. Local consideration of polymorphisms for populations coexisting in stable ecosystems. J Math Biol. 1977 Dec 27;5(1):33–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00275804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ginzburg L. R. The equilibrium and stability for n alleles under the density-dependent selection. J Theor Biol. 1977 Oct 21;68(4):545–550. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Karlin S., Lieberman U. Random temporal variation in selection intensities: case of large population size. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Dec;6(3):355–382. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(74)90016-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Macarthur R. H. SOME GENERALIZED THEOREMS OF NATURAL SELECTION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Nov;48(11):1893–1897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.11.1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pimentel D. Population regulation and genetic feedback. Evolution provides foundation for control of herbivore, parasite, and predator numbers in nature. Science. 1968 Mar 29;159(3822):1432–1437. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3822.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roughgarden J. Resource partitioning among competing species--a coevolutionary approach. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Jun;9(3):388–424. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WRIGHT S. Classification of the factors of evolution. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:16–24D. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES