Abstract
GNAS/Gnas encodes Gsα that is mainly biallelically expressed but shows imprinted expression in some tissues. In Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy (AHO) heterozygous loss of function mutations of GNAS can result in ectopic ossification that tends to be superficial and attributable to haploinsufficiency of biallelically expressed Gsα. Oed-Sml is a point missense mutation in exon 6 of the orthologous mouse locus Gnas. We report here both the late onset ossification and occurrence of benign cutaneous fibroepithelial polyps in Oed-Sml. These phenotypes are seen on both maternal and paternal inheritance of the mutant allele and are therefore due to an effect on biallelically expressed Gsα. The ossification is confined to subcutaneous tissues and so resembles the ossification observed with AHO. Our mouse model is the first with both subcutaneous ossification and fibroepithelial polyps related to Gsα deficiency. It is also the first mouse model described with a clinically relevant phenotype associated with a point mutation in Gsα and may be useful in investigations of the mechanisms of heterotopic bone formation. Together with earlier results, our findings indicate that Gsα signalling pathways play a vital role in repressing ectopic bone formation.
Introduction
GNAS encodes Gsα, the alpha stimulatory subunit of the widely expressed heterotrimeric protein, Gs, that is required for hormone stimulated cAMP production [1]. Heterozygous loss of function mutations in GNAS can result in genetic disorders in which ectopic bone formation occurs [2], [3]. These include progressive osseous heteroplasia (POH), osteoma cutis (OC) and Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy, (AHO) [4], [5], [6]. In POH ectopic bone formation in the dermis and subcutaneous fat progresses to deep connective tissue and skeletal muscle resulting in joint deformities, with mounting evidence indicating that this condition occurs predominantly on paternal inheritance of inactivating GNAS mutations [4], [7]. In both POH and AHO the majority of ossification is intramembranous rather than endochondral [8] but the ossification that occurs with AHO and OC tends to be superficial. Also additional features are not usually found with POH and OC. However, AHO is also characterised by short stature, round face, brachymetacarpia, dental abnormalities and neurobehavioural problems [9]. These features, and also the subcutaneous ossification, are attributable to haploinsufficiency of Gsα in a number of tissues, and are found both on maternal and paternal transmission of the mutant allele. Thus, some patients develop AHO and others POH on paternal inheritance of inactivating GNAS mutations although the reasons for this are not clear.
Maternal inheritance of an inactivating GNAS mutation results in AHO with additional features of obesity and resistance to a variety of hormones, including parathyroid hormone (PTH) [10], [11]. These additional phenotypes can be explained in terms of the tissue specific imprinted expression of Gsα, which is predominantly expressed from the maternal allele in specific hormone target tissues. AHO combined with hormone resistance is called PHP1a, pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a, whereas AHO that occurs on paternal inheritance of an inactivating GNAS mutation without hormone resistance or severe obesity is called PPHP, pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism [11]. It is noteworthy that some patients develop POH, rather than PPHP, on paternal inheritance of an inactivating mutation in GNAS. Although AHO is generally associated with superficial ossification, subsets of patients have been identified with progressive ossification and PHP1a [4], [7] or PPHP. Multiple inactivating mutations have been described in humans that are associated with AHO [12], [13], [14] and POH [7], [15], [16]; all result in the reduction of the Gsα protein, resulting in loss of GDP and GTP binding. There appears to be no genotype/phenotype correlation, and the same mutation can present with different severity and distribution of lesions both within an affected family and between different families [4]. GNAS is a critical negative regulator of osteogenic commitment in non osseous connective tissue [17]. It is thought that inactivation of the Gsα protein results in cellular proliferation and differentiation and activation of osteoblasts. However the exact signalling pathways remain unknown.
The orthologous mouse locus Gnas is also imprinted and, as in humans, Gsα shows tissue specific imprinted expression. Although Gsα is biallelically expressed in most tissues in the mouse it is mainly expressed from the maternal allele in renal proximal tubules, newborn brown adipose tissue, pituitary and the hypothalamus [18], [19], [20]. Furthermore the GNAS/Gnas loci are similarly organized in both species with multiple alternatively spliced protein coding transcripts arising from three different promoter regions and first exons that splice onto exon 2 of Gnas (Figure 1) [21], [22]. The promoter furthest downstream generates transcripts encoding Gsα. A promoter region upstream generates transcripts for an isoform of Gsα called XLαs which differs from Gsα in that the first 47 amino acids are replaced by a large acidic N-terminal domain. XLαs shares many properties with Gsα, including activation of adenylyl cyclase, thereby promoting cAMP production [23]. XLαs is paternal-specific and is only expressed in a few tissues, mainly neuroendocrine tissues [24], [25]. Neural-specific isoforms of Gsα (GsαN1) and XLαs (XLN1) that arise from transcripts terminating in a neural exon located between exons 3 and 4 are known [26], [27]. The promoter furthest upstream generates transcripts for a chromogranin-like protein NESP55, that is exclusively maternally expressed. The open reading frame (ORF) for NESP55 is confined to its second exon, and is thus distinct from the ORF for Gsα, and NESP55 deficient mice develop normally [28].
Figure 1. Protein coding transcript map of the mouse Gnas cluster (modified from ref [66]).
Features of the maternal and paternal alleles are shown above and below the line. Arrows show direction of transcription. Transcripts arising from the first exons of protein coding transcripts, Nesp, Gnasxl, and Gnas splice onto exon 2 of Gnas. For Gnas the unbroken arrow shows predominant maternal expression and the dotted line indicates limited paternal expression. The asterisk indicates the Oed-Sml mutation in exon 6.
Mutations designed to result in loss of function of Gsα, but leave other proteins in the cluster unaffected have been generated by targeted deletion of Gnas exon 1 [29], [30]. Maternal inheritance resulted in obesity [29], [30] and resistance to PTH and TSH [30] whereas paternal inheritance lead to a minimal increase in adiposity [29] and normal hormone responsiveness [30], mimicking the imprinting effects seen in PHP1A and PPHP. On both maternal and paternal inheritance shorter body length was found [30], resembling the observation of short stature in AHO, attributable to loss of biallelic expression of Gsα.
The oedematous-small, Oed-Sml, mutation, derived from a specific locus mutation experiment investigating the effects of ethylnitrosourea on spermatogonial stem cells [31] is a missense mutation in exon 6 of Gnas resulting in a V159E substitution [32]. When maternally inherited it causes the Oed phenotype, characterized by extremely severe oedema at birth whereas paternal inheritance gives rise to the Sml phenotype of postnatal growth retardation [31]. In adult Oed mice the mutation also results in resistance to PTH, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia [19] and obesity [33]; findings consistent with loss of function of Gsα. Thus Oed constitutes a mouse model of PHP1a. On paternal transmission the Oed-Sml mutation will affect Gsα, but only in tissues in which it is normally biallelically expressed. Paternal transmission will additionally affect XLαs. The neural forms GsαN1 and XLN1 will be unaffected. The dual effects on Gsα and XLαs are probably reflected in the short and lean phenotype found in adult Sml mice [33].
We here report the finding of dermal ectopic ossification in both Oed and Sml mice in adults up to 15 months of age. This phenotype is similar on both maternal and paternal inheritance and is thus attributable to haploinsufficiency of an effect on biallelically expressed Gsα. The ossification is confined to subcutaneous tissues and does not affect deeper tissue and so resembles the subcutaneous ossification observed with AHO. Thus the Oed-Sml mice provide a model of heterotopic ossification associated with loss of function mutations in GNAS, and may be useful in investigations of the mechanisms of heterotopic bone formation.
Results
Fibromatous skin masses in Sml and Oed mice
The first observed skin abnormalities in Sml and Oed mice were pedunculated or sessile hairless skin masses commonly located on the feet or tail (Figure 2A, 2C); there was only a single instance of a mass occurring elsewhere and this was on the perineum. Microscopically these skin masses were covered by sparsely haired epidermis that could be focally ulcerated (Figure 2D, 2E). Underlying tissue consisted of a fibromatous proliferation of uniform spindle cells and entrapped follicles and adnexae (Figure 2E) reminiscent of a benign fibroma of human skin [34]. Skin masses with intralesional radiographic opacities (Figure 2B) contained foci of bone that we interpret as osseous heteroplasia (Figure 2F).
Figure 2. Fibromatous skin masses in Sml and Oed mice.
(A) An ulcerated pedunculated hairless mass on the front paw (arrow) of 7-month-old Oed male mouse. (B) X-ray of this lesion shows radio-opacities (arrow). (C) A hairless nodule on the tail (arrow) of a 12-month-old Oed male mouse. (D, E and F) A pedunculated mass in a 8-month-old Oed male mouse. (D) This mass has a narrow pedicel (arrow p) and is focally ulcerated (arrow u). (E) Intact hyperkeratotic epithelium (arrow e) bordering a mass of fibromatous connective tissue (arrow f) with an entrapped follicle (arrow ef) and associated sebaceous gland. (F) Focal areas of osseous heteroplasia (arrow o) within the fibromatous mass (arrow f). Scale bars: A,B,C = 0.5 mm; D = 1 mm; E = 100 µm; F = 50 µm.
These skin masses were present from 6.5 months of age onwards. During life, in Sml mice <10 months of age the incidence was 17% (6/35) but no skin masses were seen in 15 +/+ sibling controls. In Sml mice >12 months of age the incidence rose to 74% (39/53), significantly different from both the complete lack of skin masses in 19 male +/+ sibling controls >12 months, (P<0.0001 Fisher's exact test) and in Sml mice <10 months of age (P<0.0001Fisher's exact test). In Oed mice <10 months of age the incidence was 25% (5/20) significantly different (P<0.05) from the absence of skin masses in 20 +/+ sibling controls. In Oed mice >12 months of age the incidence was 52% (11/21), significantly different from the complete absence of skin masses in 13 +/+ sibling controls (P<0.01) but not significantly different from the incidence at <10 months. The incidences of skin masses were not significantly different in Sml and Oed at <10 months or >12 months of age.
Widespread radiographic lesions in the skin
To explore whether osseous heteroplasia was confined to the skin masses we took whole body x-rays and found radio-opacities were more generalized. To determine whether radio-opacities were superficial (in the dermis or subcutaneous fat) or deep (in connective tissue and muscle) whole body radiographs were obtained before skin dissection in a subset of 40 Sml and Oed mice aged 12 and 15-months (18 Oed males, 15 Sml males and 7 Sml females). In all cases there were no detectable adhesions between the skin and underlying trunk and limb muscles and the skin dissected cleanly. Furthermore the radio-opacities were accounted for in the dissected skin (Figure 3A) and not in trunk or limb musculature. In 6 and 9 month Sml and Oed male mice, the radio-opacity number (range 0–48) and cumulative area (range 0–18 mm2) overlapped and did not significantly differ (P>0.05) from their respective +/+ controls (Figure 3B and 3C). A single outlier +/+ male with wounded skin gave the high value of 48 lesions with a cumulative area of 18 mm2. At 12 and 15 months radiographic changes had risen significantly (P<0.001) in Sml males (range 0–37 and 0–36 mm2) over +/+ controls (range 0–8 and 0–0.3 mm2). In Oed males radiographic changes (range 0–49 and 0–77 mm2) were significantly higher (P<0.01) than +/+ controls (zero for both parameters) (Figure 3B and 3C).
Figure 3. Skin radio-opacities increase with age in Sml and Oed mice and correspond to foci of osseous heteroplasia.
(A) X-ray image of radio-opacities in the skin of a 12-month-old Sml male imaged on a 1×1 cm grid. (B) The number and (C) cumulative area of skin radio-opacities in Sml and Oed male mice at 6 & 9 months of age are not significantly different from +/+ controls, however they are significantly increased in the 12 & 15-month-old cohorts compared to +/+ mice. (D) The number and (E) cumulative area of skin radio-opacities in Sml and Oed females at 6 & 9 months of age are not significantly different from +/+ controls, however they are significantly increased in the 12 & 15-month-old Sml compared to +/+ controls. In the box and whisker plots each box represents the median with 25 and 75% inter-quartile ranges, with whiskers representing the data range (minimum and maximum). The group size n is indicated alongside each histogram bar, whereas the circled numbers are the off-scale maximum values. ns = not significant P>0.05, * P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Kruskall Wallis non-parametric one-way ANOVA tests were performed with Dunn's multiple comparison tests for post hoc testing. † A single male +/+ control with high levels of radio-opacities was an outlier that had a wounded skin. (F). Radio-opacities correspond to foci of osseous heteroplasia (arrow o) with osteoclasts (arrow oc) beneath intact skin. (G) Focus of hematopoietic tissue (arrow h) within an area of osseous heteroplasia, inset is enlarged view (arrow h), the bone surface has an osteoblast layer (arrow ob). Scale bars: F = 100 µm; G = 200 µm.
In Sml and Oed female mice, the number (range 0–3) and cumulative area (range 0–0.4 mm2) of radio-opacities were low and not significantly different (P>0.05) from their respective +/+ controls at 6 and 9 months. However, by 12 and 15 months, both radiographic changes had risen in Sml females (range 0–11 and 0–16 mm2) significantly (P<0.05, and P<0.01 respectively) above +/+ control levels (range 0–2 and 0–8 mm2) (Figure 3D and 3E).
Radiographic lesions in the skin correspond to foci of osseous heteroplasia
Skin histology revealed that areas with radio-opacities (Figure 3A) corresponded to foci of subcutaneous and dermal osseous heteroplasia characterized by irregular bone lamellae with osteoclasts within lacunae (Figure 3F). Some of the bone foci had large lacunae lined with osteoblasts and accumulations of hematopoietic tissue (Figure 3G). When skin samples from Sml and Oed mice with radio-opacities were systematically examined for underlying histological changes, 60% (6/10) and 91% (32/35) were confirmed to have foci of dermal or subcutaneous ossification in 6 & 9 month-old and 12 & 15 month-old cohorts respectively (Table 1). In contrast, mineralization of dermal or subcutaneous connective tissue characterized by basophilic extracellular collagenous stroma was a less common finding than bone in Sml and Oed 12 & 15 month-old mice (Table 1). Dermal or subcutaneous bone was found in significantly fewer 12 & 15 month +/+ mice compared with Sml and Oed mice (11% [3/27] versus 92% [35/38]; P<0.0001) (Table 1). In some +/+ mice, bone was associated with injury to overlying skin whereas the majority of instances of dermal bone in Sml and Oed mice occurred beneath intact uninjured epithelium (Figure 3F, 3G). Sixteen Sml and Oed mice from 6 & 9 and 12 & 15 month old cohorts that had confirmed dermal or subcutaneous bone underwent a systematic histological examination of internal organs and revealed unremarkable low background incidence of bony change and mineralization. One mouse had small foci of bone in the lung, 4 had minimal focal mineralization in various organs including the kidney, Harderian gland, stomach, intestines and male accessory reproductive gland. The finding of late onset osseous heteroplasia on both paternal and maternal inheritance of the Oed-Sml mutation suggests that these lesions are due to haploinsufficiency of Gsα.
Table 1. Histological analysis of skin x-ray radio-opacities in Oed and Sml mice.
| skin x-ray | histology | |||
| osseous | ||||
| radio-opacity | heteroplasia | mineralization | ||
| 6 & 9 month | +/+ (n = 22) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sml (n = 10) | 5* | 2ns | 1 | |
| Oed (n = 13) | 5ns | 4* | 1 | |
| 12 & 15 month | +/+ (n = 27) | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Sml (n = 19) | 16*** | 16*** | 1ns | |
| Oed (n = 19) | 19*** | 16*** | 2ns | |
2×2 Fisher Exact tests were used to compare proportions of Sml or Oed with +/+ control mice bearing each lesion. ns = not significant P>0.05,
P<0.05,
P<0.001.
Plasma biochemistry
In young adult Oed mice the Gnas mutation results in resistance to PTH, hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia [19]. We therefore examined whether similar changes occurred in older Oed mice and in Sml mice, since they could conceivably play a role in osseous heteroplasia.
In Oed males PTH was highly elevated at 6 & 9 months (266±24 pmol/L versus 17±4 pmol/L; P<0.0001) and at 12 & 15 months (249±36 pmol/L versus 22±5 pmol/L; P<0.0001) compared with +/+ controls. The moderate elevation in PTH in Sml males did not achieve statistical significance at 6 & 9 months (88±29 pmol/L versus 18±5 pmol/L; P = 0.054) but at 12 & 15 months was significant (71±13 pmol/L versus 19±5 pmol/L; P<0.002) (Figure 4A).
Figure 4. Plasma biochemistry phenotypes of male Sml and Oed mice.
(A) Plasma PTH was significantly elevated in Oed mice at 6 & 9 and 12 & 15 months of age compared to +/+ controls. The modest elevation in Sml PTH levels at 6 & 9 months failed to reach significance (P = 0.053) but PTH was significantly elevated at 12 & 15 months compared with respective +/+ controls. Plasma calcium corrected for albumin levels (B) in Oed mice was lower than their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months but not at 12 & 15 months. Calcium in Sml males was not lower than in their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months but was lower than controls at 12 & 15 months. Plasma phosphate levels (C) in Oed mice were higher compared with their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months but not at 12 & 15 months. Plasma phosphate in Sml males was not significantly different from +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months and at 12 & 15 months was lower than +/+ controls. The group size n is indicated alongside each histogram bar, the error bar is ± s.e.m; ns = not significant P>0.05, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. 2-tailed t-tests with unequal group variance were performed on the PTH data.
Plasma calcium corrected for albumin in Oed males was significantly lower than their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months (2.1±0.08 mmol/L versus 2.3±0.02 mmol/L, P = 0.029), but not at 12 & 15 months. Calcium in Sml males was not significantly lower than in their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months but was lower than controls at 12 & 15 months (2.1±0.09 mmol/L versus 2.4±0.04 mmol/L, P = 0.0021).
Plasma phosphate levels in Oed males were significantly higher compared with their respective +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months (2.7±0.18 mmol/L versus 1.9±0.23 mmol/L, P = 0.014), but not at 12 & 15 months. Plasma phosphate in Sml males was not significantly different from +/+ controls at 6 & 9 months and at 12 & 15 months was actually lower than +/+ controls (2.0±0.12 mmol/L versus 2.6±0.14 mmol/L, P = 0.0021).
Discussion
In this animal model we have identified both radiological and pathological evidence of heterotopic ossification or osteoma cutis (the formation of mature bone in soft tissues). In this study we have analysed two cohorts of 6 & 9 month (n = 52) and 12 & 15 month (n = 102) Oed/Sml mice and their +/+ controls. In summary we identified: (a) a statistically significant increase in soft tissue lesions (histologically confirmed as fibroepithelial polyps) in aged Sml and Oed mice; (b) a statistically significant increase in both the number and cumulative area of radio-opacities in aged Oed and Sml male and female mice; and (c) highly elevated PTH levels in both younger and older Oed mice and moderately elevated PTH levels in older Sml mice.
The first observed skin phenotype, benign cutaneous fibroepithelial polyps, is similar on both maternal and paternal inheritance of the Oed-Sml mutation and are thus attributable to haploinsufficiency of biallelically expressed Gsα. These fibromas have some resemblance to the skin angiofibromas described by Sakamoto et al. [35] in their exon 2 Gnas deletion model.
It is interesting to note that the fibromas described in the latter model were stated to arise in a similar distribution to ours on the ear, paws and tail, occurred with a similar age and sex distribution, and were associated with calcification. Sakamoto et al. [35] state that pre-existing trauma may be a predisposing factor, which may be a similar cause in our model considering the similarities in lesional distribution, the only difference being we did not find fibromas on the ears in our model despite inadvertent injury to the ear caused by notching for identification/genotyping.
In the Sakamoto et al. paper [35] all lesions were associated with calcification only, while in our study, we identified three lesions that were associated with ossification. However we did not serially section all lesions to confirm the presence or absence of microscopic ossification in others. It is unclear whether these lesions represent a subset of dermal ossification lesions that became pedunculated or were associated with additional fibrous proliferation, or whether they represent a separate entity with additional etiology.
Although we identified a statistically significant increase in soft tissue polypoid lesions in this model, the clinical significance is unclear. In our review of the clinical literature of AHO and PHP1A patients there is no mention of soft tissue lesions as described by us or by Sakamoto et al. [35].
The second phenotype, namely subcutaneous ossification and calcification, was observed both radiologically and confirmed by histological examination. Previous mouse models of inactivating Gnas mutations generated via a variety of mechanisms have also shown evidence of superficial heterotopic ossification [17], [36], [37] with similar histological features to those found in our model. In a conditional renin induced exon 1 Gnas deletion model, skin mineralisation plus additional skeletal deformities were observed in both male and female mice with local deletion of Gnas in both the kidney and extrarenal tissues including skin [36]. In a separate targeted exon 1 deletion model generated by Huso et al. [37], heterozygous male and female mice developed non-progressive subcutaneous ossifications related to sites of trauma with ageing. In our study, we also identified late onset heterotopic ossification confined to subcutaneous tissues on both maternal and paternal inheritance of the Oed-Sml mutation. Overall, heterotopic ossification is similar in both Oed and Sml indicating that the difference in genetic background has not had a significant effect on the phenotype. The Oed-Sml mutation will affect biallelically expressed Gsα in both Oed and Sml, imprinted Gsα in Oed, and imprinted XLαs in Sml. The similarity in the ossification phenotype in both Oed and Sml indicates that it is attributable to partial loss of Gsα in tissues in which Gnas is biallelically expressed, not to imprinted Gsα or XLαs. Thus the ENU mutation resulting in Oed and Sml gives rise to a bone phenotype more in keeping with that generally associated with AHO (both PHP1A and PHPP) rather than POH, in that it is confined to superficial tissues and is attributable to haploinsufficiency of biallelically expressed Gsα.
Patients with PHP1A develop PTH resistance and associated hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, features attributable to imprinted expression of GNAS [3]. Oed mice with a maternally derived mutant Oed-Sml allele were known to have highly elevated PTH levels at 10 weeks of age [19], and have now been shown to have highly elevated PTH levels up to 15 months of age. Gnas shows imprinted expression in proximal renal tubules, the primary site of PTH action in the kidney [18], [19], [30], [38], [39]. However, in imprinted tissues Gnas appears to be predominantly but not exclusively expressed from the maternally derived allele with about 70–80% expression from the maternal allele and 20–30% from the paternal allele [18], [38], [40]. It had also been shown previously that Oed mice that additionally carried a mutation leading to loss of imprinting of Gnas so resulting in biallelic expression of Gnas did not have, as expected, a wild type concentration of PTH but one that was intermediate between wild type and Oed [19]. To account for this intermediate level it was proposed that whereas the now functional paternal allele enabled normal PTH signaling the mutant maternal allele did not. Thus the Oed-Sml allele probably generates a mutant Gsα polypeptide that can associate with Gsβ and Gsγ polypeptides to form a heterotrimeric Gs protein but one that that is non functional, and so PTH signaling activity is restricted resulting in a partial normal response to PTH [19].
A similar argument for a partial normal response to PTH can be put forward to account for the moderate elevation in PTH concentration in Sml mice in the present study. In these mice it is expected that 70–80% of the Gnas expression in proximal renal tubules will be from the wild type functional maternal allele and 20–30% from the mutant nonfunctional paternal allele. The wild type maternal allele will enable normal PTH signaling but the mutant paternal allele will not, so curtailing overall signaling activity through Gsα and accounting for some elevation in the PTH level but to a much lesser extent than in Oed mice.
Although hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were found to be associated with the highly elevated PTH levels at 10 weeks of age in Oed mice [19] and now at 6 & 9 months in this study, hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia did not occur at 12 & 15 months in Oed mice and the reason(s) for this are unclear. Although hypocalcemia was associated with the moderate elevation in PTH in Sml mice at 12 and 15 months, hyperphosphatemia was not seen and indeed the mice were hypophosphatemic relative to their respective controls, and the reason(s) for this is are not clear.
It should be noted that the average plasma calcium (2.1–2.4 mmol/L) and phosphate (1.9–2.7 mmol/L) levels for all cohorts in this study are close to MRC Harwell baselines found in 18 week old mice in other inbred mouse strains (C57BL/6, BALB/c, C3H and 129) (see data deposited in http://europhenome.org). Although Oed and Sml mice are on a different genetic background to these inbred strains and are older, the observation that plasma calcium and phosphate levels found in Oed and Sml mice are within normal limits for other strains of mice raises the question whether the relative degree of hypocalcaemia and hyperphosphatemia is either pathological or contributory to the development of osseous heteroplasia. The absence of any significant degree of dermal mineralization in Oed and Sml mice suggests that the changes in are not in themselves pathological. Taken together, tissue calcification does not occur as a direct consequence of PTH resistance nor does tissue calcification appear to be critical to the development of osseous heteroplasia in Oed, and Sml mice.
We have reviewed the clinical literature of patients with AHO or PHP1a who have had additional mutational analysis (Table S1). Of a total 120 patients with either syndrome reported in the literature, 61 were stated to have superficial subcutaneous calcifications which were either multiple or single plaque like lesions, located frequently on the abdomen, back, limbs and digits (Table S1). Some calcifications were reported to be associated with ossification; in other patients osteomas were identified as well as subcutaneous calcification. Rarely intracerebral calcification was reported but there was no reference to either progressive or deep calcification of other organs in these patients. Of significance, our review of 120 patients reported in the literature with either AHO or PHP1a and mutational analysis revealed that there was no report of subcutaneous fibromas or fibroepithelial polyps in any of the patients investigated. In one patient there is reference to a calcifying aponeurotic fibroma with central osteoid formation which may have in fact been a polypoid osteoma [41]. It appears therefore that there is no correlation between fibroma observed in our model and that of Sakamoto et al. [35] and the human clinical syndromes AHO and PHP1a [4], [7], [12], [41]–[63] (Table S1).
A wide range of genetic mutations were identified in these patients ranging from insertion and deletions of base pairs leading to frameshift mutations, premature termination and truncated proteins to missense mutations in which a particular amino acid was substituted. There was no clear genotype-phenotype correlation, though there appeared to be two mutation hotspots in exon 7 and exon 10. Although there are no reported patients with the exact missense mutation created in the Oed/Sml mouse (V159E), there are reports of two patients with other missense mutations in exon 6 (Table S1). One mutation is in codon 159, V159M in a patient with PHP1a but no reported subcutaneous calcification [63] and the other mutation is a substitution of cysteine for arginine (R165C) in codon 165 in a patient with PHP1a with reported subcutaneous calcification [12] (Table S1).
In summary our data confirm some of the cutaneous findings associated with other targeted mouse models of AHO but is exceptional in that it has both osseous heteroplasia and fibromas and is caused by a missense mutation. Our model is unique in that it is the first model described with a clinically relevant phenotype associated with a point mutation and thus will prove invaluable in dissection of the genotype-phenotype correlation in the complex array of human genetic mutations that result in AHO/PHP1A. Together with earlier results, our findings indicate that Gsα signalling pathways play a vital role in repressing ectopic bone formation. Thus the Oed-Sml mice provide a model of heterotopic ossification associated with loss of function mutations in GNAS, and may be useful in investigations of the mechanisms of heterotopic bone formation.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Full details of the study were approved after review by MRC Harwell ethical review committee and the humane care and use of mice in this study was carried out under the authority of the appropriate UK Home Office Project Licence.
Mice
The generation and husbandry of GnasOedsml-pat, GnasOedsml-mat and their wild-type litter mates Gnas+/+ (hereafter referred to as Sml, Oed and +/+ respectively) is described by Kelly et al. [33]. Briefly, paternal inheritance of the mutation results in Sml mice, and maternal inheritance results in Oed mice and both show relatively poor viability [31]. Sml can be maintained on our standard laboratory stock, 3H1A and Oed on M.m.castaneus (MCA). Sml and Oed cannot be maintained on the same background because Oed is lethal on 3H1A and Sml is lethal on MCA. Thus Sml mice were generated by crossing 3H1A females with Sml males and Oed mice by crossing Sml females with MCA males.
Initially Sml and Oed males aged to 6, 9, 12 and 15 months were used but subsequently females were incorporated into the study. Data for 6 & 9 month-old cohorts and 12 & 15 month old cohorts were each pooled to enlarge group size and aid statistical analyses.
Specific pathogen-free mice were housed in individually ventilated cages under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle, temperatures of 21±2°C and humidity of 55±10%. Mice were fed an expanded rat and mouse no. 3 breeding diet (Special Diets Services, Witham, UK) containing 1.15% calcium, 0.82% phosphate and 4089 units/kg vitamin D, and given water ad libitum. Cohorts of mice were aged to 6, 9, 12 and 15 months for pathology analysis and plasma biochemistry. Skin lesions that were visible during life were recorded.
Histology and image analysis
Macroscopic skin masses from the paws and tails and samples of skin corresponding to identified radio-opacities were processed for histology. In mice with no detectable radio-opacities, three randomly chosen interscapular skin sections corresponding to the site surveyed in skin X-ray analysis were used to assess the possibility of microscopic dermal changes. The histology of all major internal organs (brain, salivary glands, ears, eyes, Harderian gland, reproductive tract, heart, lungs, trachea, esophagus, stomach, liver, intestine, pancreas, kidneys, adrenals, thyroids, thymus, spleen and mesenteric lymph node) were examined in a subset of Sml and Oed mice. Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed and embedded in paraffin wax and 3 µm sections were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin using standard techniques [64]. Digital images were captured on an Olympus BX51 microscope using ×20, ×40 or ×60 Plan Achromat objectives with neutral density filter, on a ColorView Soft Imaging System software using automatic exposure times.
X-ray analysis
Euthanized mice were fixed flat in 10% buffered formalin after removal of thoracic and abdominal viscera. The skin was dissected from underlying subcutaneous fat and muscle in one piece to include any gross skin lesions of the paws and tail. The skin was thoroughly washed in tap water to remove any adherent material then placed on a 1 cm2 grid to obtain life-size dorsoventral digital X-ray images with a MX-20 Faxitron using a 26 Kv and a 3 second exposure. The entire skin was initially surveyed for radio-opacities and soft tissue masses in a series of images covering head and neck, trunk, pelvis and tail, and limb distal extremities. A 3×3 1 cm2 grid area covered the dorsal mid shoulder to lumbar region, and a ‘X’ shaped pattern of five of these 1 cm2 grid squares were chosen to count the number and cumulative area of radio-opacities (mm2). The total number and area of radio-opacities in each skin was measured using Photoshop CS3 extended edition (Adobe systems, USA).
Blood collection
Blood was collected from the jugular vein of mice under terminal anesthesia induced by an i.p. overdose of sodium pentobarbital. Lithium-heparin plasma samples were aliquoted and frozen at −80°C.
Clinical biochemistry and PTH assay
Plasma was assayed for calcium, phosphate and albumin on an Olympus AU-400 analyzer. Parathyroid hormone was measured using a mouse intact PTH ELISA kit (Immutopics). Calcium was corrected for albumin levels using the standard formula [65]: corrected calcium = measured calcium−[(albumin g/l−30)×0.017].
Statistics
D'Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality tests were performed on radio-opacity and biochemistry data sets. The data was not normally distributed for the radio-opacity data therefore Kruskall Wallis non-parametric one-way ANOVA tests were performed followed by Dunn's multiple comparison tests for post hoc testing. In the biochemistry data t-tests were performed comparing Sml and +/+ controls, and Oed and +/+ controls at each age. Fisher exact tests were used for the presence or absence of skin radio-opacities and macroscopic skin lesions. Data is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.), or using box and whisker plot; each box represents the median with 25 and 75% inter-quartile ranges, with whiskers representing the data range (minimum and maximum).
Supporting Information
Paper review of SCO and genetic mutations in AHO/PHP1a.
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff of the Mary Lyon Centre for the husbandry and humane care of these mice; Jim Humphreys and Dave Shipston in the pathology team; Adele Austin, Caroline Barker, Jenny Corrigan and Liz Darley in the histology team; Steve Thomas and Adrian Ford for preparing the figures.
Funding Statement
All co-authors with the exception of MVM are core funded by the Medical Research Council. (www.mrc.ac.uk/). No additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Weinstein LS, Yu S, Warner DR, Liu J (2001) Endocrine manifestations of stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit mutations and the role of genomic imprinting. Endocr Rev 22: 675–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Weinstein LS, Liu J, Sakamoto A, Xie T, Chen M (2004) Minireview: GNAS: normal and abnormal functions. Endocrinology 145: 5459–5464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bastepe M, Jüppner H (2005) GNAS locus and pseudohypoparathyroidism. Horm Res 63: 65–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Adegbite NS, Xu M, Kaplan FS, Shore EM, Pignolo RJ (2008) Diagnostic and mutational spectrum of progressive osseous heteroplasia (POH) and other forms of GNAS-based heterotopic ossification. Am J Med Genet 146A 1788–1796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yeh GL, Mathur S, Wivel A, Li M, Gannon FH, et al. (2000) GNAS1 mutation and Cbfa1 misexpression in a child with severe congenital platelike osteoma cutis. J Bone Miner Res 15: 2063–2073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Weinstein LS, Chen M, Xie T, Liu J (2006) Genetic diseases associated with heterotrimeric G proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci 27: 260–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lebrun M, Richard N, Abeguilé G, David A, Coëslier Dieux A, et al. (2010) Progressive osseous heteroplasia: a model for the imprinting effects of GNAS inactivating mutations in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 3028–3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kaplan FS, Craver R, MacEwen GD, Gannon FH, Finkel G, et al. (1994) Progressive osseous heteroplasia: a distinct developmental disorder of heterotopic ossification. Two new case reports and follow-up of three previously reported cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76: 425–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wilson LC, Trembath RC (1994) Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 31: 779–784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Davies SJ, Hughes HE (1993) Imprinting in Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 30: 101–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Long DN, McGuire S, Levine MA, Weinstein LS, Germain-Lee EL (2007) Body mass index differences in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a versus pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism may implicate paternal imprinting of Galpha(s) in the development of human obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92: 1073–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ahrens W, Hiort O, Staedt P, Kirschner T, Marschke C, et al. (2001) Analysis of the GNAS1 gene in Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 4630–4634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Linglart A, Carel JC, Garabédian M, Lé T, Mallet E, et al. (2002) GNAS1 lesions in pseudohypoparathyroidism Ia and Ic: genotype phenotype relationship and evidence of the maternal transmission of the hormonal resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 189–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aldred MA, Bagshaw RJ, Macdermot K, Casson D, Murch SH, et al. (2000) Germline mosaicism for a GNAS1 mutation and Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 37: E35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shore EM, Ahn J, Jan de Beur S, Li M, Xu M, et al. (2002) Paternally inherited inactivating mutations of the GNAS1 gene in progressive osseous heteroplasia. New Eng J Med 346: 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Faust RA, Shore EM, Stevens CE, Xu M, Shah S, et al. (2003) Progressive osseous heteroplasia in the face of a child. Am J Med Genet A 118A: 71–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pignolo RJ, Xu M, Russell E, Richardson A, Kaplan J, et al. (2011) Heterozygous inactivation of Gnas in adipose-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells enhances osteoblast differentiation and promotes heterotopic ossification. J Bone Miner Res 26: 2647–2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yu S, Yu D, Lee E, Eckhaus M, Lee R, et al. (1998) Variable and tissue-specific hormone resistance in heterotrimeric Gs protein alpha-subunit (Gsalpha) knockout mice is due to tissue-specific imprinting of the Gsalpha gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 8715–8720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Williamson CM, Ball ST, Nottingham WT, Skinner JA, Plagge A, et al. (2004) A cis-acting control region is required exclusively for the tissue-specific imprinting of Gnas . Nat Genet 36: 894–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen M, Wang J, Dickerson KE, Kelleher J, Xie T, et al. (2009) Central nervous system imprinting of the G protein G(s)alpha and its role in metabolic regulation. Cell Metab 9: 548–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hayward BE, Moran V, Strain L, Bonthron DT (1998) Bidirectional imprinting of a single gene: GNAS1 encodes maternally, paternally, and biallelically derived proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15475–15480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Peters J, Wroe SF, Wells CA, Miller HJ, Bodle D, et al. (1999) A cluster of oppositely imprinted transcripts at the Gnas locus in the distal imprinting region of mouse chromosome 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 3830–3835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Klemke M, Pasolli HA, Kehlenbach RH, Offermanns S, Schultz G, et al. (2000) Characterization of the extra-large G protein alpha-subunit XLalphas. II. Signal transduction properties. J Biol Chem 275: 33633–33640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Plagge A, Gordon E, Dean W, Boiani R, Cinti, et al. (2004) The imprinted signalling protein XLαs is required for postnatal adaptation to feeding. Nat Genet 36: 818–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xie T, Plagge A, Gavrilova O, Pack S, Jou W, et al. (2006) The alternative stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit XLalphas is a critical regulator of energy and glucose metabolism and sympathetic nerve activity in adult mice. J Biol Chem 281: 18989–18999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Crawford JA, Mutchler KJ, Sullivan BE, Lanigan TM, Clark MS, et al. (1993) Neural expression of a novel alternatively spliced and polyadenylated Gsα transcript. J Biol Chem 268: 9879–9885. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pasolli HA, Klemke M, Kehlenbach RH, Wang Y, Huttner WB (2000) Characterization of the extra-large G protein alpha-subunit XLalphas. I. Tissue distribution and subcellular localization. J Biol Chem 275: 33622–33632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Plagge A, Isles AR, Gordon E, Humby T, Dean W, et al. (2005) Imprinted Nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3019–3026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen M, Gavrilova O, Liu J, Xie T, Deng, et al. (2005) Alternative Gnas gene products have opposite effects on glucose and lipid metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 7386–7391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Germain-Lee EL, Schwindinger W, Crane JL, Zewdu R, Zweifel LS, et al. (2005) A mouse model of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy generated by targeted disruption of exon 1 of the Gnas gene. Endocrinology 146: 4967–4709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cattanach BM, Peters J, Ball S, Rasberry C (2000) Two imprinted gene mutations: three phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2263–2273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Skinner JA, Cattanach BM, Peters J (2002) The imprinted oedematous-small mutation on mouse chromosome 2 identifies new roles for Gnas and Gnasxl in development. Genomics 80: 373–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kelly ML, Moir L, Jones L, Whitehill E, Anstee QM, et al. (2009) A missense mutation in the non-neural G-protein alpha-subunit isoforms modulates susceptibility to obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 33: 507–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McKee PH, Calonje JE, Granter SR (2006) Pathology of the skin: with clinical correlates. 3rd Edition, Mosby Ltd, 2112pp
- 35. Sakamoto A, Weinstein LS, Plagge A, Eckhaus M, Kelsey G (2009) GNAS haploinsufficiency leads to subcutaneous tumor formation with collagen and elastin deposition and calcification. Endocr Res 34: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Castrop H, Oppermann M, Mizel D, Huang Y, Faulhaber-Walter R, et al. (2007) Skeletal abnormalities and extra-skeletal ossification in mice with restricted Gsalpha deletion caused by a renin promoter-Cre transgene. Cell Tissue Res 330: 487–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Huso DL, Edie S, Levine MA, Schwindinger W, Wang Y, et al. (2011) Heterotopic Ossifications in a Mouse Model of Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy. PLoS One 6: e21755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liu J, Chen M, Deng C, Bourc'his D, Nealon JG, et al. (2005) Identification of the control region for tissue-specific imprinting of the stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 5513–5518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fröhlich LF, Mrakovcic M, Steinborn R, Chung UI, Bastepe M, et al. (2010) Targeted deletion of the Nesp55 DMR defines another Gnas imprinting control region and provides a mouse model of autosomal dominant PHP-Ib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9275–9280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Williamson CM, Turner MD, Ball ST, Nottingham WT, Glenister P, et al. (2006) Identification of an imprinting control region affecting the expression of all transcripts in the Gnas cluster. Nat Genet 38: 350–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kacerovska D, Nemcova J, Pomahacova R, Michal M, Kazakov DV (2008) Cutaneous and superficial soft tissue lesions associated with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy: clinicopathological and molecular genetic study of 4 cases, including a novel mutation of the GNAS gene. Am J Dermatopathol 30: 417–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Eddy MC, Jan De Beur SM, Yandow SM, McAlister WH, Shore EM, et al. (2000) Deficiency of the alpha-subunit of the stimulatory G protein and severe extraskeletal ossification. J Bone Miner Res 15: 2074–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Nwosu BU, Lee MM (2009) Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a and insulin resistance in a child. Nat Rev Endocrinol 5: 345–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Pohlenz J, Ahrens W, Hiort O (2003) A new heterozygous mutation (L338N) in the human Gsalpha (GNAS1) gene as a cause for congenital hypothyroidism in Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. Eur J Endocrinol 148: 463–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gelfand IM, Eugster EA, DiMeglio LA (2006) Presentation and clinical progression of pseudohypoparathyroidism with multi-hormone resistance and Albright hereditary osteodystrophy: a case series. J Pediatr 149: 877–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Patten JL, Johns DR, Valle D, Eil C, Gruppuso PA, et al. (1990) Mutation in the gene encoding the stimulatory G protein of adenylate cyclase in Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. N Engl J Med 322: 1412–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ahmed SF, Dixon PH, Bonthron DT, Stirling HF, Barr DG, et al. (1998) GNAS1 mutational analysis in pseudohypoparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49: 525–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Warner DR, Gejman PV, Collins RM, Weinstein LS (1997) A novel mutation adjacent to the switch III domain of G(S alpha) in a patient with pseudohypoparathyroidism. Mol Endocrinol 11: 1718–1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Warner DR, Weng G, Yu S, Matalon R, Weinstein LS (1998) A novel mutation in the switch 3 region of Gsalpha in a patient with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy impairs GDP binding and receptor activation. J Biol Chem 273: 23976–23983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Iiri T, Herzmark P, Nakamoto JM, van Dop C, Bourne HR (1994) Rapid GDP release from Gs alpha in patients with gain and loss of endocrine function. Nature 371: 164–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Aldred MA, Trembath RC (2000) Activating and inactivating mutations in the human GNAS1 gene. Hum Mutat 16: 183–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Schwindinger WF, Miric A, Zimmerman D, Levine MA (1994) A novel Gs alpha mutant in a patient with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy uncouples cell surface receptors from adenylyl cyclase. J Biol Chem 269: 25387–25391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Weinstein LS, Gejman PV, Friedman E, Kadowaki T, Collins RM, et al. (1990) Mutations of the Gs alpha-subunit gene in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy detected by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 8287–8290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Yu D, Yu S, Schuster V, Kruse K, Clericuzio CL, et al. (1999) Identification of two novel deletion mutations within the Gs alpha gene (GNAS1) in Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84: 3254–3259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Weinstein LS, Gejman PV, de Mazancourt P, American N, Spiegel AM (1992) A heterozygous 4-bp deletion mutation in the Gs alpha gene (GNAS1) in a patient with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. Genomics 13: 1319–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wilson LC, Oude Luttikhuis ME, Clayton PT, Fraser WD, Trembath RC (1994) Parental origin of Gs alpha gene mutations in Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 31: 835–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Shapira H, Mouallem M, Shapiro MS, Weisman Y, Farfel Z (1996) Pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia: two new heterozygous frameshift mutations in exons 5 and 10 of the Gs alpha gene. Hum Genet 97: 73–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Garavelli L, Pedori S, Zanacca C, Caselli G, Loiodice A, et al. (2005) Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy (pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia): clinical case with a novel mutation of GNAS1. Acta Biomed 76: 45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Alvarez F, Kottler ML, Paul C, Gennero I, Salles JP, et al. (2010) Albright hereditary osteodystrophy: report of a particular clinical phenotype caused by a novel GNAS mutation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24: 974–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Klagge A, Jessnitzer B, Pfaeffle R, Stumvoll M, Fuhrer D (2010) A novel GNAS1 mutation in a German family with Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 118: 586–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Riepe FG, Ahrens W, Krone N, Fölster-Holst R, Brasch J, et al. (2005) Early manifestation of calcinosis cutis in pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia associated with a novel mutation in the GNAS gene. Eur J Endocrinol 152: 515–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. de Sanctis L, Vai S, Andreo MR, Romagnolo D, Silvestro L, et al. (2004) Brachydactyly in 14 genetically characterized pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 1650–1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Linglart A, Carel JC, Garabédian M, Lé T, Mallet E, et al. (2002) GNAS1 lesions in pseudohypoparathyroidism Ia and Ic: genotype phenotype relationship and evidence of the maternal transmission of the hormonal resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 189–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bancroft JD, Gamble M (2008) Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, 6th Edition. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone. 744 pp
- 65.Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE (2005) Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders. 2448 pp
- 66. Peters J, Williamson C (2007) Control of Imprinting at the Gnas cluster. Epigenetics 2: 201–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Paper review of SCO and genetic mutations in AHO/PHP1a.
(XLSX)




