Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2012 Dec 4;109(51):20955–20959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218633110

Rise to dominance of angiosperm pioneers in European Cretaceous environments

Clément Coiffard a, Bernard Gomez b,1, Véronique Daviero-Gomez b, David L Dilcher c,1
PMCID: PMC3529080  PMID: 23213256

Abstract

The majority of environments are dominated by flowering plants today, but it is uncertain how this dominance originated. This increase in angiosperm diversity happened during the Cretaceous period (ca. 145–65 Ma) and led to replacement and often extinction of gymnosperms and ferns. We propose a scenario for the rise to dominance of the angiosperms from the Barremian (ca. 130 Ma) to the Campanian (ca. 84 Ma) based on the European megafossil plant record. These megafossil data demonstrate that angiosperms migrated into new environments in three phases: (i) Barremian (ca. 130–125 Ma) freshwater lake-related wetlands; (ii) Aptian–Albian (ca. 125–100 Ma) understory floodplains (excluding levees and back swamps); and (iii) Cenomanian–Campanian (ca. 100–84 Ma) natural levees, back swamps, and coastal swamps. This scenario allows for the measured evolution of angiosperms in time and space synthesizing changes in the physical environment with concomitant changes in the biological environment. This view of angiosperm radiation in three phases reconciles previous scenarios based on the North American record. The Cretaceous plant record that can be observed in Europe is exceptional in many ways. (i) Angiosperms are well preserved from the Barremian to the Maastrichtian (ca. 65 Ma). (ii) Deposits are well constrained and dated stratigraphically. (iii) They encompass a full range of environments. (iv) European paleobotany provides many detailed studies of Cretaceous floras for analysis. These factors make a robust dataset for the study of angiosperm evolution from the Barremian to the Campanian that can be traced through various ecosystems and related to other plant groups occupying the same niches.

Keywords: vegetation turnover, early angiosperms, ecology, evolution in time and space


Less than 20 y after the publication of The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin wrote to Oswald Heer in a letter dated March 8, 1875: “The sudden appearance of so many Dicotyledons in the Upper Chalk appears to me a perplexing phenomenon” (1, p 539). A few years later, he wrote to Joseph Dalton Hooker in a letter dated July 22, 1879: “The rapid development as far as we can judge of all the higher plants within recent geological times is an abominable mystery” (1, p 378). Darwin was referring to the frequent appearance of leaves of the flowering plants with the beginning of the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian Stage), as it was known at that time. Since then, paleobotanists have attempted to explain the “sudden” appearance of angiosperms in the fossil record based either on the present percentage and distribution of living primitive taxa in the tropics (2) or on fossils from the middle Cretaceous of North America (36). These publications have included many new finds on somewhat older Cretaceous strata. We present here a unique interpretation of the European Cretaceous record of angiosperms in their paleoenvironmental context. Our synthesis demonstrates that early angiosperms were at first successful invaders in only certain environments but expanded into others over an interval of ∼45 million y (7). Three phases are clearly recognizable that represent different stages in the success story of flowering plants.

Phase 1: Barremian–Aptian Freshwater Lake-Related Wetlands

Worldwide, Barremian (ca. 130–125 Ma) angiosperm megafossils are very rare, represented by 11 genera, 5 of which apparently lived in freshwater lake/wetland habitats (815, *). In an aquatic community, these angiosperms competed with charophytes that dominated macrophytic associations since the Permian (10, 11, 13). In the Barremian of Europe (Figs. 1 and 2A), chloranthoid/Afropollis pollen indicate the presence of terrestrial angiosperms (16), although matoniaceous fern thickets and open conifer woodlands in floodplains dominated the terrestrial vegetation. The physiognomy of the megafossil plants from the Barremian (ca. 130 Ma) to the middle Aptian (ca. 118 Ma) is consistent with the fact that during that time Western Europe underwent an arid phase (17, 18). Diversified aquatic angiosperm megafossils (19) and terrestrial chloranthoid, lauralean, and magnolialean fossil pollen (16) appear in the late Aptian (Fig. 2B). This diversification was accompanied by the closure of canopy woodland, with conifers spreading over most environments and the near extinction of matoniaceous ferns (ref. 19; Fig. 2B). In contrast, terrestrial angiosperm leaf megafossils are very rare except for Quercophyllum from the Aptian/Albian of Arnal (Portugal) that probably grew along freshwater lakes or pond margins.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pie diagrams representing the vegetation changes in Europe from the Barremian to the Santonian. The paleoenvironmental reconstructions correspond to Barremian (A), Aptian (B), Albian (C), Cenomanian (D), and Turonian–Santonian (E). BM, brackish marsh; BR, braided river; EM, estuary mouth; FP, floodplain; FS, freshwater swamp; L, levee; LP, lake/pond.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Vegetation changes in Europe from the Barremian to the Santonian put into an environmental context. The paleoenvironmental reconstructions correspond to Barremian (A), Aptian (B), Albian (C), Cenomanian (D), and Turonian–Santonian (E). The dashed circles indicate the environments/habitats as follows: BM, brackish marsh; BR, braided river; EM, estuary mouth; FP, floodplain; FS, freshwater swamp; L, levee; LP, lake/pond. The red circles and numbers (1–10) indicate the major ecological changes as follows: 1, turnover between ferns and conifers in braided river environments (vegetation closure); 2, diversification of angiosperms in wetland-related habitats; 3, diversification of the vegetation in brackish marsh; 4, oldest record of angiosperms in floodplains, 57, oldest record of angiosperms in brackish marsh, levee, and swamp environments; 8, turnover between conifers and angiosperms in braided river environments; 9, increase in platanoid occurrence; and 10, oldest record of woody monocotyledons.

Phase 2: Albian Understory Floodplains (Excluding Levees and Back Swamps)

The total taxa count in the vegetation of Europe became very diverse during the Albian (ca. 112–100 Ma). For example in the floodplains, there were ca. 4 angiosperms per 11 taxa in total per locality during the Albian vs. 0 angiosperms per 8 taxa in total during the Barremian and 0 angiosperms per 6 taxa in total during the Aptian. This angiosperm increase coincided with a warming period beginning in the early Albian (20, 21), when angiosperms exhibited widening ecological ranges (Fig. 2C). They continued to dominate the aquatic vegetation (22, 23) but also occurred in significant numbers in the floodplains for the first time (ref. 19; Fig. 2C). From the Barremian, angiosperms competed with Osmundaceae taxa (e.g., Cladophlebis Brongniart), which nearly disappeared during the Albian.

In contrast to the small-leafed, highly ramified angiospermous habit, the ferns and gymnosperms, which were replaced by the angiosperms, often showed a large-leafed, monocaulous habit. The small-leafed, ramified habit is more resilient than those with a single apical meristem that may be damaged or lost. If the meristem of a monocaulous plant is destroyed, it may die or recover only very slowly, whereas a ramified plant can use many active meristems that will allow the plant to recover quickly. In closed forests of the floodplains, angiosperms occupied the understory, and conifers formed the canopy (ref. 19; Fig. 2C). In contrast, matoniaceous fern thickets were exclusive to the open vegetation of floodplains (19). Most floodplain angiosperms belonged to core angiosperms (i.e., Eudicots and Magnoliids; ref. 19). Besides the rare occurrence of floodplain angiosperms before (12, 14, 15, 24), the increase of Eudicots in the Albian could be due to a poleward dispersion driven by global warming. This dispersion is also supported by the poleward dispersion of tricolpate (Eudicot) pollen grains shown by Hickey and Doyle (25) and Lidgard and Crane (26). This poleward dispersion may be related to the poleward shift of the megathermal forest during the Aptian–Albian (27).

Phase 3: Cenomanian–Campanian Levees, Back Swamps, and Coastal Swamps

At the beginning of the Cenomanian (ca. 100 Ma), angiosperms were already widespread in Europe and inhabited most environments, except marine-dominated estuary river mouths (ref. 28; Fig. 2D). In the back swamps, they replaced Cycadales and, to a lesser extent, matoniaceous and dicksoniaceous ferns. In the coastal swamps, they competed with matoniaceous ferns (e.g., Weichselia Stiehler) and constitute the earliest record of halophytic angiosperms (28, 29). Angiosperms exhibited clear tree habit, especially trees of Lauraceae and Platanaceae, which inhabited disturbed channel margins (Fig. 2D). In such a niche, they may have displaced conifers due to a faster seedling growth rate in agreement with Bond’s hypothesis (28, 30, 31). Angiosperm abundance in various Cenomanian environments would have been enhanced by their shorter life cycles compared with those of the gymnosperms.

From the Turonian (ca. 94 Ma), various genera of the Platanaceae spread over more stable floodplain environments, whereas Bennettitales and Dicksoniaceae decreased (ref. 32; Fig. 2E). Palms competed with Cupressaceae (Taxodium affinities) in the back swamps (33). The palm seedlings developed large leaf crowns that shaded understory weeds, and conifer seedlings must compete with the weeds. During the later growth stage, palm monocaulous habit represents a lower energetic cost than Cupressaceae trunks, resulting in either a faster growth or higher allocation to reproduction. Cupressaceae were maintained in cooler areas, whereas palms do poorly in cool and cold temperate climates.

Reconciliation of Previous Scenarios

Several hypotheses based mainly on North American records have been proposed to explain the dispersal and rise to dominance of the angiosperms. In this work, we focus our attention on the dispersal of the angiosperms through time with special reference to when angiosperms came to occupy the niches of particular environments as demonstrated by the Cretaceous sedimentary record preserved in Europe. This view of angiosperm rise to domination during Cretaceous time can be seen in three phases that typify their diversification and occupation of more varied habitats (Fig. 1).

This record is contrasted with the angiosperm record through time and space in North America. The scenario by Doyle and Hickey (3) and Hickey and Doyle (25) proposed that fossil angiosperms from the Aptian–Lower Albian of Potomac Zone I were understory shrubs and grew on levees and in floodplains. These were followed by pinnately compound leafed platanoid trees–shrubs (e.g., Sapindopsis Fontaine) during the Upper Albian (Potomac Zone IIB) in the same environments. This change in angiosperm vegetation corresponds to phase 2 of our scenario (Fig. 1C). Platanoids (e.g., Araliopsoides Berry) evolved along disturbed channel margins from the Cenomanian of the Potomac Zone III and colonized floodplains from the Cenomanian-Turonian of the Potomac Zone IV. The latter two Zones are in agreement with our phase 3 (Fig. 2D). Doyle and Hickey (3) and Hickey and Doyle (25) hypothesized that early angiosperms were riparian weeds before the Aptian but had no fossil record to support this interpretation.

Retallack and Dilcher (4) proposed a reconstruction of the late Albian Dakota Formation flora and showed that angiosperms occupied a variety of environments. Lauraceous trees/shrubs (e.g., Prisca/Magnoliaephyllum) occupied swampy woodlands and margins of coastal lagoons; angiospermous shrubs (e.g., “Acerites”) colonized margins of tide-dominated deltas; platanoids were common around freshwater lakes, levees, and swales of freshwater coastal stream sides (e.g., Araliopsoides); and conifers forested dry continental floodplains (4). Closer inspection shows some differences from Europe (34). However, although slightly older, overall the Dakota floras and their ancient environments fit well with the beginning of the phase 3 of our scenario (Fig. 2D), even though there were some differences. In addition, the Magnoliales (e.g., Liriophyllum Lesquereux, Didromophyllum Upchurch and Dilcher) found in North America were lacking in Europe, and the Laurales were represented by different taxa (e.g., Pabiana Upchurch and Dilcher in Northern America vs. Cocculophyllum Velenovský in Europe).

Taylor and Hickey (35) suggested that early angiosperms were perennial rhizomatous plants resembling herbaceous Magnoliids such as Piperaceae and that they competed with ferns and sphenopsids in disturbed areas such as stream margins. These angiosperms then invaded the aquatic niche in the Early Cretaceous due to their rhizomatous growth habit and efficient seedlings, thus creating a stable environment.

Feild et al. (36) and Feild and Arens (37, 38) hypothesized a disturbed forest understory and/or streamside shrubby ecology similar to the ecology of extant basal angiosperm lineages (i.e., Amborellaceae, Nymphaeales, Austrobaileyales, and Chloranthaceae). Retallack and Dilcher’s (4) “coastal hypothesis,” Taylor and Hickey’s (35) “paleoherb,” and Feild et al.’s (36) “dark and disturbed” hypotheses are supported by the occurrence of angiosperms in disturbed floodplain environments from the Aptian (e.g., lower zone I of the Potomac group, United States; refs. 25, 39). This early angiosperm ecology may fit our phase 2, but is unlike our phase 1 (Fig. 2 A and B). One may question whether the earliest angiosperms were shade tolerant as proposed by the “damp, dark, and disturbed habitats” hypothesis (36, 38). An ecophysiological study of hypothetical living relatives of the zone I Potomac (Aptian–Albian) group angiosperms indicates that, if the assumed living related angiosperms are a good model of the physiology of the earliest angiosperms, they may have been shade tolerant (40). Furthermore, the three phases proposed here for the angiosperm rise to dominance show an interesting synchronism with the progressive increase of escalation in angiosperm leaf hydraulic capacity also noted by Feild et al. (41) that reflects an escalation in ecological range.

European, Chinese, and North American records (10, 11, 42, 43, *) all show that angiosperms occurred in aquatic environments from at least the Barremian. The occurrence of early aquatic angiosperms opens the way for a reinterpretation of the North American records such as the Aptian peltate leaves of Proteaephyllum reniforme Fontaine. This leaf also agrees with the early aquatic angiosperms that appeared in the European phase 1 that we recognize (Fig. 2A).

Darwin’s Abominable Mystery

Darwin’s “abominable mystery” concerning the sudden appearance of rather modern genera of flowering plants can now be understood. What most bothered Darwin was “the sudden appearance of so many extant taxa of flowering plants in the Upper Chalk” (1). At that time, he was relying on a paleobotanical record produced by people who approached the study of angiosperm fossils with the intent of relating them to extant taxa by using only gross leaf form as a basis for their systematic determinations. More recently, numerous Early Cretaceous angiosperm remains have been described as extinct angiosperm leaf and fruit morphotypes based upon critical observations and evaluations of many leaf and fruit characters. Our scenario supports the view by Darwin that “the presence of even one true angiosperm in the Lower Chalk makes [one] inclined to conjecture that plant[s] of this great division must have been largely developed in some isolated area, whence owing to geographical changes, they at last succeeded in escaping, and spread quickly over the world” (1, p 539). Thus, the rise to dominance of angiosperms was a process that lasted >45 million years. Dilcher (44, 45) pointed out that the modern nature of the fossil angiosperms identified in the Cretaceous were products of the use of limited characters combined with the goal of finding extant angiosperm genera. Probably there are no extant angiosperm genera that extend back to the Cretaceous when careful and detailed character analysis is used.

Angiosperms became abundant and diversified worldwide in coastal environments by the Albian as proposed in the “coastal hypothesis of angiosperm dispersal” (4). The so-called “sudden appearance of angiosperms” is really a series of ecological successions captured by exceptional depositional and preservational environments. At this time, there are also important rapid changes in the biotic environment as angiosperm and insect coevolution gains momentum (46, 47). The biotic changes and habitat changes may seem to be sudden events, but in geological time these, events can be seen as occurring in distinct phases as outlined here (Fig. 2).

By mid-Cretaceous time, some early ancestors of major taxa can be recognized. This diversification and local abundance in particular environments explains why Friis and colleagues (e.g., refs. 4851) found very diverse and abundant angiosperm mesofossil flowers, fruits, and seeds in Portuguese stratigraphic horizons now considered as Late Aptian–Early Albian in age (16), whereas older Aptian mesofossil floras (e.g., Torres Vedras, Catefica) were less diversified and mainly consisted of the early diverging clades [e.g., Austrobaileyales (Anacostia) and Chloranthaceae (Pennipollis) plant; refs. 51 and 52]. The fossil angiosperms reported by Friis et al. (50, 51) are diverse, abundant, and well preserved so that some can be linked to extant major angiosperm lineages. Their occurrence in fluvial deposits demonstrates the occupation of understory floodplains in phase 2 (Fig. 2C). Overall, the ecological diversification of angiosperms parallels the progressive systematic diversification of angiosperms evidenced from mesofossils (51, 52).

Crepet et al. (53), Crepet and Nixon (54), Grimaldi (55), and Hu et al. (46, 47) have called attention to angiosperm coevolution with insects. This coevolution appears to have been a crucial step in the rise to dominance of angiosperms (46, 47, 56). For example, the increase in ecological range and richness of conifers from the beginning of the Albian suggests closed vegetation under humid climates that encouraged the rise of understory angiosperms. This situation implies that angiosperms did not simply overtop other plant groups in different environments, but they benefited from any opportunities offered by global vegetation and climate changes. Furthermore angiosperms were not the only clade that experienced a diversification during the Cretaceous: Core Leptosporangiate ferns, Pinaceae, Gnetaceae, and Podocarpaceae also underwent extensive diversification (5762). In addition, the heterosporous ferns originated and radiated at this same time (63, 64). It is important to appreciate the extent of vegetation turnover during the Cretaceous. We need to expand our focus when dealing with angiosperm evolution to consider also angiosperm evolution in time and space as they pioneered changing physical and biotic environments through Cretaceous time.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Professor Hermann Pfefferkorn and Dr. Wolfram Kuerchner for helpful comments on this manuscript. C.C. was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and B.G. and V.D.-G. were supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche Grant CNRS-UMR5276. This work is a contribution to the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers Project NOVAMBRE 2 and was supported by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness Projects CGL2009-11838/BTE, CGL2011-27869, and CGL2011-23948 3; and Catalan Government Project SGR2009-1451.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

*Gomez B, Daviero-Gomez V, Martín-Closas C, de la Fuente M, Montsechia vidalii, an early aquatic angiosperm from the Barremian of Spain. Seventh European Palaeobotany and Palynology Conference, September 6–11, 2006, Prague, p 49 (abstr).

References

  • 1.Darwin F, Seward AC. More Letters of Charles Darwin. A Record of his Work in a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Letters. Vol 1 and 2. London: John Murray; 1903. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Axelrod DI. Poleward Migration of Early Angiosperm Flora: Angiosperms only displaced the relict Jurassic-type flora at high latitudes in Late Cretaceous time. Science. 1959;130(3369):203–207. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3369.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Doyle JA, Hickey LJ. Pollen and leaves from the mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. In: Beck CB, editor. Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. New York: Columbia Univ Press; 1976. pp. 139–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Retallack GJ, Dilcher DL. A coastal hypothesis for the dispersal and rise to dominance of flowering plants. In: Niklas KJ, editor. Paleobotany, Paleoecology, and Evolution. New York: Praeger; 1981. pp. 27–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Retallack G, Dilcher DL. A Coastal theory of flowering plant origin. In: Niklas KJ, editor. Paleobotany, Paleoecology, and Evolution. New York: Praeger; 1986. pp. 27–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Retallack GJ, Dilcher DL. Cretaceous angiosperm invasion of North America. Cretac Res. 1986;7(3):227–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.International Commission on Stratigraphy International Stratigraphic Chart. 2010. Available at www.stratigraphy.org/ics%20chart/09_2010/StratChart2010.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2012.
  • 8.Vachrameev VA, Kotova IZ. Oldest angiosperms and associated plants from the Lower Cretaceous deposits of Transbaikalia. Paleontol Zh. 1977;1977(4):101–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun G, Dilcher DL. Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous of Jixi, eastern Heilongjiang, China. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2002;121(2):91–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun G, Dilcher DL, Zheng S, Zhou Z. In search of the first flower: A Jurassic angiosperm, archaefructus, from northeast China. Science. 1998;282(5394):1692–1695. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5394.1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun G, et al. Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science. 2002;296(5569):899–904. doi: 10.1126/science.1069439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leng Q, Friis EM. Sinocarpus decussatus gen. et sp. nov, a new angiosperm with syncarpous fruits from the Yixian Formation of northeast China. Plant Syst Evol. 2003;241(1-2):77–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martín-Closas C. The fossil record and evolution of freshwater plants: A review. Geol Acta. 2003;1(4):315–338. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dilcher DL, Sun G, Ji Q, Li H. An early infructescence Hyrcantha decussata (comb. nov.) from the Yixian Formation in northeastern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(22):9370–9374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703497104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun G, Dilcher DL, Wang H, Chen Z. A eudicot from the Early Cretaceous of China. Nature. 2011;471(7340):625–628. doi: 10.1038/nature09811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heimhofer U, Hochuli PA, Burla S, Dinis J, Weissert H. Timing of Early Cretaceous angiosperm diversification and possible links to major palaeoenvironmental change. Geology. 2005;33(2):141–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ruffell AH, Batten DJ. The Barremian-Aptian arid phase in Western Europe. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1990;80(3-4):197–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haywood AM, Valdes PJ, Markwick PJ. Cretaceous (Wealden) climates: A modeling perspective. Cretac Res. 2004;25(3):303–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Coiffard C, Gomez B, Thévenard F. Early Cretaceous angiosperm invasion of Western Europe and major environmental changes. Ann Bot (Lond) 2007;100(3):545–553. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leckie RM, Bralower TJ, Cashman R. Oceanic anoxic events and plankton evolution: Biotic response to tectonic forcing during the mid-Cretaceous. Paleoceanography. 2002;17(1041):1–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Price GD, Hart MB. Isotopic evidence for Early to mid-Cretaceous ocean temperature variability. Mar Micropaleontol. 2002;46(1-2):45–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gomez B, et al. Klitzschophyllites, aquatic basal Eudicot (Ranunculales?) from the Upper Albian (Lower Cretaceous) of North-Eastern Spain. Int J Plant Sci. 2009;170(8):1075–1085. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sender LM, et al. Ploufolia wagnerii gen. et sp. nov.: A new aquatic angiosperm from the upper Albian of northeastern Spain. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2010;161(1-2):77–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leng Q, Friis EM. Angiosperm leaves associated with Sinocarpus Leng et Friis infructescences from the Yixian Formation (mid-Early Cretaceous) of NE China. Plant Syst Evol. 2006;262(3-4):173–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hickey LJ, Doyle JA. Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution. Bot Rev. 1977;43(1):538–589. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lidgard S, Crane PR. Quantitative analyses of the early Angiosperm radiation. Nature. 1988;331(6154):344–346. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coiffard C, Gomez B. Role of latitude and climate in spread, radiations and rise to dominance of early angiosperms through the Cretaceous. Geol Acta. 2012;10(2):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coiffard C, Gomez B, Kvaček J, Thévenard F. Early angiosperm ecology: Evidence from the Albian-Cenomanian of Europe. Ann Bot (Lond) 2006;98(3):495–502. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Coiffard C, et al. Intramarginal veined Lauraceae leaves from the Albian-Cenomanian of Charente-Maritime (western France) Palaeontology. 2009;52(2):323–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bond WJ. The tortoise and the hare: Ecology of angiosperm dominance and gymnosperm persistence. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 1989;36(3):227–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Becker P. Competition in the regeneration niche between conifers and angiosperms: Bond’s slow seedling hypothesis. Funct Ecol. 2000;14(4):401–412. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coiffard C, Gomez B. The rise to dominance of the angiosperm kingdom: Dispersal, habitat widening and evolution during the Upper Cretaceous of Europe. Lethaia. 2010;43(2):164–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marmi J, Gomez B, Martín-Closas C, Villalba-Breva S. A plant reconstruction of the early palm Sabalites longirhachis (Unger) J. Kvaček et Herman from the Maastrichtian of Pyrenees. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2010;163(1-2):73–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kvaček J, Dilcher DL. Comparison of Cenomanian floras from western interior North America and Central Europe. Acta Univ Carol Geol. 2000;44(1):17–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Taylor DW, Hickey LJ. Evidence for and implications of an herbaceous origin for angiosperms. In: Taylor DW, Hickey LJ, editors. Flowering Plant Origin, Evolution, and Phylogeny. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1996. pp. 232–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Feild TS, Arens NC, Doyle JA, Dawson TE, Donoghue MJ. Dark and disturbed: A new image of early angiosperm ecology. Paleobiology. 2004;30(1):82–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Feild TS, Arens NC. Form, function and environments of the early angiosperms: Merging extant phylogeny and ecophysiology with fossils. New Phytol. 2005;166(2):383–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Feild TS, Arens NC. The ecophysiology of early angiosperms. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(3):291–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hochuli PA, Heimhofer U, Weissert H. Timing of early angiosperm radiation: Recalibrating the classical succession. J Geol Soc London. 2006;163(4):587–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Feild TS, et al. Fossil evidence for low gas exchange capacities for Early Cretaceous angiosperm leaves. Paleobiology. 2011a;37(2):195–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Feild TS, et al. Fossil evidence for Cretaceous escalation in angiosperm leaf vein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011b;108(20):8363–8366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014456108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Upchurch GR, Crane PR, Drinnan AN. The megaflora from the Quantico locality (upper Albian), Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group of Virginia. Mem Virginia Mus Nat Hist. 1994;4:1–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang Y, Dilcher DL. Aquatic angiosperms from the Dakota formation (Albian, Lower Cretaceous), Hoisington III locality, Kansas, USA. Int J Plant Sci. 2006;167(2):385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dilcher DL. Approaches to the identification of fossil leaf remains. Bot Rev. 1974;40(1):1–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dilcher DL. Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(13):7030–7036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu S, Dilcher DL, Jarzen DM, Winship Taylor D. Early steps of angiosperm pollinator coevolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(1):240–245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707989105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hu S, Dilcher DL, Taylor DW. Pollen evidence for the pollination biology of early flowering plants. In: Patiny P, editor. Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2012. pp. 165–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Friis EM, Pedersen K, Crane PR. Early angiosperm diversification: The diversity of pollen associated with angiosperm reproductive structures in Early Cretaceous floras from Portugal. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1999;86(2):259–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Friis EM, Pedersen K, Crane PR. Reproductive structure and organization of basal angiosperms from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian or Aptian) of western Portugal. Int J Plant Sci. 2000;161(Suppl 6):S169–S182. doi: 10.1086/314248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Friis EM, Pedersen KR, Crane PR. Cretaceous diversification of angiosperms in the western part of the Iberian Peninsula. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2010;162(3):341–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Doyle JA, Endress PK, Upchurch GR. Early Cretaceous monocots: A phylogenetic evaluation. Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae Ser B Historia Naturalis. 2008;64(2-4):59–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Crepet WL, Friis EM, Nixon KC, Lack AJ, Jargembowski EA. Fossil evidence for the Evolution of Biotic Pollination. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991;333(1267):187–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Crepet WL, Nixon KC. Fossil Clusiaceae from the late Cretaceous (Turonian) of New Jersey and implications regarding the history of bee pollination. Am J Bot. 1998;85(8):1122–1133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Grimaldi D. The co-radiations of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1999;86(2):373–406. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dilcher DL. Major innovations in angiosperm evolution. In: Gee CT, editor. Plants in Mesozoic Time: Morphological Innovations, Phylogeny, Ecosystems. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ Press; 2010. pp. 96–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Crane PR, Upchurch GR. Drewria potomacensis gen. et sp. nov., an Early Cretaceous member of Gnetales from the Potomac Group of Virginia. Am J Bot. 1987;74(11):1722–1736. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kelch DG. Phylogeny of Podocarpaceae: Comparison of evidence from morphology and 18S rDNA. Am J Bot. 1998;85(7):986–996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rydin C, Mohr B, Friis EM. Cratonia cotyledon gen. et sp. nov.: A unique Cretaceous seedling related to Welwitschia. Biol Lett. 2003;270(Suppl 1):S29–S32. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rydin C, Wu SQ, Friis EM. Liaoxia Cao et S.Q. Wu (Gnetales): Ephedroids from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation in Liaoning, northeastern China. Plant Syst Evol. 2006;262(3-4):239–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schneider H, et al. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature. 2004;428(6982):553–557. doi: 10.1038/nature02361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang XQ, Tank DC, Sang T. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: Evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17(5):773–781. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dilcher DL, Kar RK, Dettmann ME. The functional biology of Devonian spores with bifurcate processes: A hypothesis. The Palaeobotanist. 1992;41:67–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kar RK, Dilcher DL. An argument for the origin of heterospory in an aquatic environment. The Palaeobotanist. 2002;51(1-3):1–11. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES