Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2013 Jan 23;64(4):1145–1152. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers398

Translational downregulation of RBCL is operative in the coordinated expression of Rubisco genes in senescent leaves in rice

Yuji Suzuki 1,, Amane Makino 1,2
PMCID: PMC3580822  PMID: 23349140

Abstract

Rubisco gene expression was examined in detail in rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves at different positions, i.e. expanding, mature, and senescent leaves. Rubisco small subunit (RBCS) synthesis and RBCS mRNA levels were maximal in expanding leaves and gradually became lower in mature and senescent leaves, with declines in those of the large subunit (RBCL) being relatively slower. The amount of synthesized RBCL per unit level of RBCL mRNA and polysome loading of RBCL mRNA declined in senescent leaves, whereas such phenomena were not observed for RBCS. These results suggested that gene expression of RBCL is downregulated at the level of its translation when a balance between RBCL and RBCS expression is disturbed by leaf senescence. It has been suggested that RBCS protein is a positive regulator for RBCL mRNA level in expanding rice leaves, as judged from their stoichiometric relationship in RBCS transgenic rice plants. However, the ratio of the RBCL mRNA level to the amount of synthesized RBCS in senescent leaves was significantly higher than that in expanding leaves. Therefore, it is suggested that the decline in RBCL mRNA level in senescent leaves is not fully accounted for by that in the amount of synthesized RBCS. Effects of other factors such as the stability of RBCL mRNA may come into play.

Keywords: gene expression, leaf senescence, rice, RBCS, RBCL, Rubisco

Introduction

Rubisco (EC 4.1.1.39) is a key enzyme in photosynthesis and the most abundant leaf protein. It catalyses two competing reactions, CO2 fixation in photosynthesis and the production of 2-phosphoglycolate in the photorespiratory pathway, and is a rate-limiting factor for both photosynthesis and photorespiration under conditions of saturating light and at atmospheric levels of CO2 and O2 (Evans, 1986; Makino et al., 1988). Rubisco accounts for 15–30% of total leaf N content in C3 species (Evans, 1989; Makino et al., 1992) and is important in both the C and N economy of the plant.

In higher plants, Rubisco is composed of eight small subunits, encoded by a nuclear multigene family (RBCS) (reviewed by Dean et al., 1989), and eight large subunits, encoded by a single gene (RBCL) in the chloroplast genome. It has been considered that expression of RBCL is modulated at the level of its translation for the coordinated expression between RBCL and RBCS. When the RBCS gene was suppressed by an antisense technique in tobacco (Rodermel et al., 1988; Hudson et al., 1992), a C4 plant (Flaveria bidentis; Furbank et al., 1996), and rice (Makino et al., 1997), the amount of Rubisco holoenzyme declined. In RBCS-antisense tobacco, the RBCL mRNA level was unaffected, despite a substantial decline in RBCS mRNA level (Rodermel et al., 1988). Gene expression of RBCL was then downregulated primarily at the level of its translation initiation (Rodermel et al., 1996; Rodermel, 1999). Furthermore, it has been suggested that translation of RBCL is repressed by a repressor motif in unassembled RBCL protein that is otherwise not accessible (Wostrikoff and Stern, 2007). This autoregulation of Rubisco synthesis is similar to that first described for the cytochrome b6/f complex in Chlamydomonas, namely, control by epistasy of synthesis (CES; Kuras and Wollman, 1994; Choquet et al., 1998; Choquet and Vallon, 2000; Boulouis et al., 2011). In addition to tobacco, the translational modulation of RBCL is probably operative in Arabidopsis, as a decline in RBCL mRNA level has been found to be smaller than those in total RBCS mRNA level and the amount of Rubisco protein in rbcs mutants (Izumi et al., 2012).

In contrast, a different type of mechanism for the coordinated Rubisco gene expression has been found recently in rice. When the mRNA levels and protein synthesis of Rubisco subunits in young, expanding leaves were compared among RBCS-sense, RBCS-antisense, and wild-type plants, the RBCL mRNA level was observed to be tightly correlated not with RBCS mRNA levels but with the amount of synthesized RBCS protein (Suzuki and Makino, 2012). In contrast to tobacco, polysome loading of RBCL mRNA was relatively unaffected, even in RBCS-antisense plants. The RBCL mRNA level was then tightly correlated with the amount of synthesized RBCL protein, which was almost identical to that of RBCS protein synthesized. These results indicate that gene expression of RBCL is regulated at its transcript level in response to the availability of RBCS protein in young rice leaves.

It has been reported repeatedly that Rubisco gene expression changes in a coordinated manner during leaf development. In young leaves and/or developing leaf tissues, it has been shown that Rubisco is actively synthesized due to the accumulation of the mRNAs of Rubisco genes (wheat, Dean and Leech, 1982; barley, Nivison and Stocking, 1983; pea, Sasaki et al., 1987). During the life span of a leaf, the mRNA levels of both RBCS and RBCL have been found to decline with progress of leaf age in a number of plant species (amaranth, Nikolau and Klessig, 1987; maize, Loza-Tavera et al., 1990; bean, Bate et al., 1991; rice, Suzuki et al., 2001, 2009; eucalypt, Suzuki et al., 2010). Changes in Rubisco synthesis correspond approximately to those in the mRNA levels of Rubisco genes (Nikolau and Klessig, 1987; Bate et al., 1991; Suzuki et al., 2001, 2010). The balance between RBCS and RBCL expression may change during leaf development. For example, declines in RBCL mRNA level were slightly slower than those of RBCS (Nikolau and Klessig, 1987; Loza-Tavera et al., 1990; Bate et al., 1991; Suzuki et al., 2009, 2010). A similar trend was found when RBCL synthesis and RBCS synthesis were analysed separately (Nikolau and Klessig, 1987; Bate et al., 1991; Suzuki et al., 2010). However, how expression of Rubisco genes is coordinated is still unknown in relation to the differences in leaf age.

To examine this point, Rubisco gene expression was studied in detail in leaves at different positions, i.e. expanding, mature, and senescent leaves in rice. The amounts of synthesized RBCS and RBCL their corresponding mRNA levels were determined in these leaves and their relationships were analysed quantitatively. Polysome loading of the Rubisco genes was also analysed as an index for their translational status.

Materials and methods

All experimental procedures have been described by Suzuki and Makino (2012). The followings are brief explanations.

Plant culture and 15N labelling

Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv Notohikari) plants were grown hydroponically in an isolated and temperature-controlled greenhouse. One plant was grown in a 1.1 litre plastic pot and the distance between the pots was about 20cm, which did not lead to heavy mutual shading. Plants were labelled with 15N for measurements of RBCS and RBCL synthesis for 2 d when the 11th leaves became one-third of their final length. The 11th, 10th, and 9th leaves were then collected, weighed, immediately frozen in liquid N2, and stored at –80ºC until analysis. All samples were collected between 11:00 and 13:00h.

Rubisco determination

Rubisco content was determined by SDS-PAGE of leaf homogenate followed by formamide extraction of Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250-stained bands corresponding to RBCS and RBCL using calibration curves prepared with purified rice Rubisco (Makino et al., 1985).

Measurement of Rubisco synthesis

RBCS and RBCL were purified by preparative SDS-PAGE (Suzuki et al., 2010). The amounts of RBCS and RBCL were calculated from the amounts of Rubisco holoenzyme and the ratio of molecular mass between RBCS and RBCL. The 15N abundances of these proteins were measured by emission spectrography (Yoneyama et al., 1975) using a 15N-analyser (N-151; JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) and the amounts of synthesized RBCS and RBCL were calculated as described by Mae et al. (1983).

RNA analysis

RNA preparation and polysome separation was carried out based on the methods of Suzuki et al. (2004) and Sugimoto et al. (2004), respectively, with slight modifications (Suzuki and Makino, 2012). The mRNA levels of Rubisco genes were determined by real-time quantitative PCR after reverse transcription (Ogawa et al., 2012).

Statistical analysis

Three independent plants were analysed per data plot and are shown as means ±standard error (SE) (n=3 biological replications). Dunnett’s test was performed with JMP (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results and discussion

Gene expression of RBCL becomes relatively stronger than that of RBCS in senescent rice leaves

Rubisco contents and the amounts of its subunits synthesized were determined in rice leaves at different positions. The 11th, 10th, and 9th leaves were young expanding leaves, the uppermost fully expanded mature leaves, and senescent leaves, respectively. Rubisco content was lowest in the 11th leaves, highest in the 10th leaves, and became slightly lower in the 9th leaves (Fig. 1A). The amounts of synthesized RBCS and RBCL were highest in the 11th leaves and gradually decreased in the 10th and 9th leaves (Fig. 1B, C). The decline in RBCL synthesis was relatively slower than that of RBCS synthesis. Although the molar ratio of RBCL synthesis to RBCS synthesis was almost identical in the 11th leaves, it became 1.4- and 2.2-fold higher in the 10th and the 9th leaves, respectively (Fig. 1D). This indicated that RBCL synthesis was excessive in comparison with RBCS synthesis in mature and senescent leaves. In spite of the changes in Rubisco synthesis, the relative band intensities between the two subunits on SDS-polyacrylamide gels did not differ, irrespective of leaf position (data not shown). This can be explained by the fact that the amount of excessive RBCL synthesized was much smaller than that of Rubisco holoenzyme (Fig. 1AC).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Rubisco contents (A), the amounts of synthesized RBCS (B) and RBCL (C) and the ratio between them (D) in rice leaves at different positions. The 11th, 10th and 9th leaves were young, expanding leaves, the uppermost, fully expanded mature leaves and senescent leaves, respectively. Data of the 11th leaves were taken from Suzuki and Makino (2012). Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference to the value of wild-type plants by Dunnet’s test (P < 0.05).

Differences in the mRNA levels of total RBCS and RBCL among these leaf positions showed a trend similar to those in synthesis of the corresponding subunits (Fig. 2A, B). The decline in RBCL mRNA level with progress of leaf age was slower than that in the RBCS mRNA level. In the 11th leaves, the molar ratio of RBCL mRNA to total RBCS mRNA was 26mol mol–1 and became 2.0- and 3.6-fold greater in the 10th and 9th leaves, respectively (Fig. 2C). These results indicated that gene expression of RBCL was relatively stronger than that of RBCS in senescent rice leaves, although the expression of these genes became inactive in contrast with those in young expanding leaves. A similar trend in protein synthesis and/or mRNA level of Rubisco subunits has been reported previously in a number of plant species (Nikolau and Klessig, 1987; Loza-Tavera et al., 1990; Bate et al., 1991; Suzuki et al., 2009, 2010). The amounts of total RNA and the levels of 18S rRNA per unit amount of total RNA, which is an internal standard for RT-PCR analysis, did not largely differ among leaves at different positions (data not shown).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The mRNA levels of total RBCS (A) and RBCL (B) and their ratios (C) in rice leaves at different positions. The 11th, 10th and 9th leaves were young, expanding leaves, the uppermost, fully expanded mature leaves and senescent leaves, respectively. In (A), white, light gray, dark gray and black columns represent the mRNA level of OsRBCS2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Data of the 11th leaves were taken from Suzuki and Makino (2012). Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference to the value of wild-type plants by Dunnet’s test (P < 0.05).

Translational downregulation of RBCL is operative in senescent leaves

In order to examine relationships between the synthesis of Rubisco subunits and the corresponding mRNA levels, the ratios of protein synthesis to mRNA levels were calculated (Fig. 3). Data obtained from the young, expanding 11th leaves of RBCS-transgenic rice plants (Suzuki and Makino, 2012) were also analysed. RBCS synthesis per unit level of total RBCS mRNA in the 10th and 9th leaves tended to be slightly higher than that in the 11th leaves (Fig. 3A). A similar trend was observed in the 11th leaves of RBCS-antisense plants, whereas the RBCS synthesis/total RBCS mRNA ratios were clearly lower in RBCS-sense plants (see Suzuki and Makino, 2012). In contrast, RBCL synthesis per unit level of RBCL mRNA in the 9th leaves was significantly lower than that in the 11th leaves (Fig. 3B), whereas there was no statistically significant difference among other samples. These results suggested that gene expression of RBCL is downregulated post-transcriptionally in senescent rice leaves, whereas such regulation is unlikely to occur in the case of RBCS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Ratios of the amount of synthesized RBCS to total RBCS mRNA level (A) and the amount of synthesized RBCL to RBCL mRNA level (B). Data are taken from Figs 1 and 2. Data obtained from the young expanding 11th leaves in RBCS-sense (lines 26-8 and 35-4) and RBCS-antisense (line AS-71) rice plants (Suzuki and Makino, 2012) are also presented. Data are presented as means ±SE (n=3). An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with the value of wild-type plants by Dunnet’s test (P <0.05).

In order to examine whether expression of Rubisco genes is modulated translationally, polysome loading of RBCS and RBCL mRNAs was analysed further after fractionation on a sucrose gradient as an index for translation initiation (Fig. 4). In the 10th and 9th leaves, profiles of polysome loading of RBCS genes were almost the same as in the 11th leaves (Fig. 4AD). This was in accordance with the fact that the RBCS synthesis/total RBCS mRNA level ratio did not decline with progress in leaf age (Fig. 3A). However, in the case of RBCL, distribution of its mRNA to the 9th fraction declined in the 10th leaves (Fig. 4E). A substantial shift to lighter fractions was also observed in the 9th leaves, showing the lesser polysome-bound status of RBCL mRNA. These results indicated that expression of RBCL is downregulated at the level of its translation initiation in senescent rice leaves. The distribution of total RNA was similar to that observed by Sugimoto et al. (2004) and was relatively unaffected by leaf position (Fig. 4F).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Polysome loading profile of Rubisco genes in rice leaves at different positions after fractionation using sucrose gradient. The 11th, 10th and 9th leaves were young, expanding leaves, the uppermost, fully expanded mature leaves and senescent leaves, respectively. Panels (A) to (E) represent the results for OsRBCS2, 3, 4 and 5 and RBCL, respectively. In (F), distribution of total RNA among the fractions is presented. The mRNA and total RNA levels of each fraction are expressed as percentages of the sum of all fractions. Symbols are the same as in Fig. 3. Data of the 11th leaves were taken from Suzuki and Makino (2012). Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference to the value of wild-type plants by Dunnet’s test (P < 0.05).

In RBCS-suppressed tobacco, gene expression of RBCL has been thought to be translationally downregulated in the CES manner. For instance, the RBCL mRNA level was relatively stable despite a drastic decline in RBCS mRNA level (Rodermel et al., 1988, 1996; Wostrikoff and Stern, 2007). Excessive, unassembled RBCL probably interacts with RBCL mRNA (Wostrikoff and Stern, 2007), leading to a decline in its polysome loading and inhibition of its translation initiation (Rodermel et al., 1996; Wostrikoff and Stern, 2007). Senescent rice leaves also had high levels of RBCL mRNA relative to RBCS mRNA (Fig. 2C), excessive synthesized RBCL (Fig. 1D), and reduced polysome loading of RBCL mRNA (Fig. 4E). Therefore, it is considered in rice that the CES regulation of RBCL is operative to prevent the imbalance between the expression of RBCL and RBCS caused by leaf senescence, whereas the expression of these genes is adjusted primarily at the level of RBCL mRNA when Rubisco is actively synthesized in young expanding leaves (Suzuki and Makino, 2012).

These results showed that the transcriptional and translational regulations of RBCL are important for different reasons in the coordinated Rubisco gene expression during leaf development in rice. On the other hand, translational modulation plays a key role in tobacco (Rodermel et al., 1988, 1996; Wostrikoff and Stern, 2007) and probably also in Arabidopsis (Izumi et al., 2012). In addition, quantitative analysis has shown that the decline in the synthesis of Rubisco subunits was slightly slower than the amounts of synthesized Rubisco subunits per unit level of the corresponding mRNA, which became slightly lower in senescent leaves of eucalyptus (Suzuki et al., 2010). This suggests that both RBCS and RBCL expression is regulated post-transcriptionally. These observations imply an interspecific difference in the coordinated expression of Rubisco genes although the molecular basis for the difference is yet to be studied.

It is possible that the translational regulation of RBCL is operative to a greater extent when Rubisco synthesis becomes inactive earlier because of accelerated leaf senescence. For example, senescence of leaves at lower positions in a canopy of herbaceous plant species is enhanced to retranslocate the N compounds derived from protein degradation to leaves at the top. The resulting non-uniform N distribution within a canopy leads to increase in N-use efficiency of canopy photosynthesis, since high leaf-N content is not reflected in photosynthetic rate under low irradiance at lower positions in a canopy (reviewed by Hikosaka, 2005; Hirose, 2005; Terashima et al., 2005). Elevated atmospheric CO2 conditions also enhance leaf senescence, leading to a reduction in Rubisco protein and mRNAs (Nie et al., 1995; Miller et al., 1997; Gesch et al., 1998; Theobald et al., 1998; Onoda et al., 2005; Seneweera et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2011). Possibly, these environmental conditions induce the translational regulation of RBCL. Moore et al. (1999) reported that polysome loading of RBCL mRNA in mature leaves of tobacco was reduced under elevated CO2 conditions, whereas that of RBCS mRNA was unaffected. The decline in the mRNA level of RBCL was greater than that of RBCS. These observations may be related to accelerated leaf senescence.

In mature leaves, the symptoms of translational modulation of RBCL were not clear (Fig. 4E), while RBCL synthesis was relatively excessive compared with RBCS synthesis (Fig. 1D). The reason for this phenomenon is still unclear. It is possible that there is a threshold in the ratio of the amount of excessive RBCL protein to RBCL mRNA level that can effectively elicit the CES regulation.

The decline in RBCL mRNA levels in senescent leaves is not fully accounted for by that in the availability of RBCS protein

It has been indicated previously that gene expression of RBCL is adjusted primarily at the transcript level in response to the availability of RBCS protein in young, expanding rice leaves, as RBCL mRNA level and RBCS synthesis were tightly correlated with each other among RBCS-transgenic and wild-type rice plants, their ratios being almost constant (Suzuki and Makino, 2012). Here, the ratios of the RBCL mRNA levels to RBCS synthesis were calculated among rice leaves at different positions (Fig. 5). Data obtained previously from RBCS-transgenic rice plants (Suzuki and Makino, 2012) are also presented again. The ratios in leaves at the lower positions became gradually higher than that in the 11th leaves, leading to more RBCL mRNA per RBCS synthesis. On the other hand, the ratios in young expanding leaves of wild-type and the RBCS-transgenic plants were similar to each other. Therefore, the decline in RBCL mRNA levels with progress of leaf age was not fully accounted for by that in the availability of RBCS protein. It is possible that other factors such as the stability of RBCL mRNA may have come into play. Klaff & Gruissem (1991) treated spinach leaves with organelle-specific translation inhibitors that forced mRNAs into a polysome-bound state or depleted mRNAs of ribosomes and found that RBCL and PSBA mRNAs were less stable when bound to polysomes relative to the polysome-depleted mRNAs. This agrees with our finding that RBCL mRNA was less polysome-bound in the 10th and 9th leaves (Fig. 4E), suggesting that an increase in the stability of RBCL mRNA led to a slow decline in its level.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Relative ratios of RBCL mRNA levels to the amount of synthesized RBCS. Data are taken from Figs 1 and 2. The value in the 11th leaves was defined as 1. Data obtained from young expanding 11th leaves in RBCS-sense (lines 26-8 and 35-4) and RBCS-antisense (line AS-71) rice plants (Suzuki and Makino, 2012) are also presented. Data are presented as means ±SE (n=3). An asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference compared with the value of wild-type plants by Dunnet’s test (P <0.05).

In summary, it is suggested that gene expression of RBCL is downregulated at the level of translation in the CES manner to match that of RBCS in senescent rice leaves. Although the regulation of RBCL at the transcript level is operative primarily in young expanding leaves, it may not be predominant in senescent leaves. It is of interest and should be studied how the transcriptional and translational regulations operate in the coordinated Rubisco gene expression in other plant species. For this purpose, it will be necessary to determine synthesis and mRNA levels of Rubisco subunits and polysome loading of these mRNAs in leaves of different ages in a wide range of plant species.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics for Agricultural Innovation GPN 0007 to A.M.), Research in a Proposed Research Area (Planned Research no. 21114006 to A.M.) and a GRENE NC-CARP project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (no. 22780055 to Y.S.). We wish to thank Dr Kensuke Kusumi (Kyushu University) for his advice on polysome analysis.

Glossary

Abbreviations:

CES

control by epistasy of synthesis

RBCS

Rubisco small subunit

RBCL

Rubisco large subunit

SE

standard error.

References

  1. Bate NJ, Rothstein SJ, Thompson JE. 1991. Expression of nuclear and chloroplast photosynthesis-specific genes during leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 801–808. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulouis A, Raynaud C, Bujaldon S, Aznar A, Wollman FA, Choquet Y. 2011. The nucleus-encoded trans-acting factor MCA1 plays a critical role in the regulation of cytochrome f synthesis in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. Plant Cell 23, 333–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Choquet Y, Stern DB, Wostrikoff K, Kuras R, Girard-Bascou J, Wollman FA. 1998. Translation of cytochrome f is autoregulated through the 5’ untranslated region of petA mRNA in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 4380–4385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choquet Y, Vallon O. 2000. Synthesis, assembly and degradation of thylakoid membrane proteins. Biochimie 82, 615–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean C, Leech RM. 1982. The co-ordinated synthesis of the large and small subunits of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase during early cellular development within a seven day wheat leaf. FEBS Letters 140, 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean C, Pichersky E, Dunsmuir P. 1989. Structure, evolution, and regulation of RbcS genes in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40, 415–439. [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans JR. 1986. The relationship between CO2-limited photosynthetic rate and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate-carboxylase content in two nuclear-cytoplasm substitution lines of wheat, and the coordination of ribulose-bisphosphate-carboxylation and electron-transport capacities. Planta 167, 351–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans JR. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78, 9–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Furbank RT, Chitty JA, von Cammerer S, Jenkins C. 1996. Antisense RNA inhibition of rbcS gene expression reduces Rubisco level and photosynthesis in the C4 plant Flaveria bidentis. Plant Physiology 111, 725–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gesch RW, Boote KJ, Vu JCV, Allen Jr LH, Bowes G. 1998. Changes in growth CO2 result in rapid adjustments of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit gene expression in expanding and mature leaves of rice. Plant Physiology 118, 521–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hikosaka K. 2005. Leaf canopy as a dynamic system: ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover. Annals of Botany 95, 521–533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirose T. 2005. Development of the Monsi-Saeki theory on canopy structure and function. Annals of Botany 95, 483–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hudson GS, Evans JR, von Cammerer S, Arvidsson YBC, Andrews TJ. 1992. Reduction of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase content by antisense RNA reduces photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiology 98, 294–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Izumi M, Tsunoda H, Suzuki Y, Makino A, Ishida H. 2012. RBCS1A and RBCS3B, two major members within the Arabidopsis RBCS multigene family, function to yield sufficient Rubisco content for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 2159–2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klaff P, Gruissem W. 1991. Changes in chloroplast mRNA stability during leaf development. Plant Cell 3, 517–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuras R, Wollman FA. 1994. The assembly of cytochrome b6/f complexes: an approach using genetic transformation of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. EMBO Journal 13, 1019–1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Loza-Tavera H, Martinez-Barajas E, Sanchez-de-Jimenez E. 1990. Regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase expression in second leaves of maize seedlings from low and high yield populations. Plant Physiology 93, 541–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mae T, Makino A, Ohira K. 1983. Changes in the amounts of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase synthesized and degraded during the life span of rice leaf (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Cell Physiology 24, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar]
  19. Makino A, Mae T, Ohira K. 1985. Enzymic properties of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase purified from rice leaves. Plant Physiology 79, 57–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Makino A, Mae T, Ohira K. 1988. Differences between wheat and rice in the enzyme properties of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and their relationship to photosynthetic gas exchange. Planta 174, 30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Makino A, Sakashita H, Hidema J, Mae T, Ojima K, Osmond B. 1992. Distinctive responses of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and carbonic anhydrase in wheat leaves to nitrogen nutrition and their possible relationships to CO2 transfer resistance. Plant Physiology 100, 1737–1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Makino A, Shimada T, Takumi S, Kaneko K, Matsuoka M, Shimamoto K, Nakano H, Miyao-Tokutomi M, Mae T, Yamamoto N. 1997. Does decrease in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase by antisense RbcS lead to a higher N-use efficiency of photosynthesis under conditions of saturating CO2 and light in rice plants? Plant Physiology 114, 483–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller A, Tsai CH, Hemphill D, Endres M, Rodermel S, Spalding M. 1997. Elevated CO2 effects during leaf ontogeny. A new perspective on acclimation. Plant Physiology 115, 1195–1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore BD, Cheng SH, Sims D, Seemann JR. 1999. The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 567–582. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nie GY, Long SP, Garcia RL, Kimball BA, Lamorte RA, Pinter PJ, Jr, Wall GW, Webber AN. 1995. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment on the development of the photosynthetic apparatus in wheat, as indicated by changes in leaf proteins. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 855–864. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nikolau BJ, Klessig DF. 1987. Coordinate, organ-specific and developmental regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase gene expression in Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Plant Physiology 85, 167–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nivison HT, Stocking CR. 1983. Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase synthesis in barley leaves. A developmental approach to the question of coordinated subunit synthesis. Plant Physiology 73, 906–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ogawa S, Suzuki Y, Yoshizawa R, Kanno K, Makino A. 2012. Effect of individual suppression of RBCS multigene family on Rubisco contents in rice leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 35, 546–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Onoda Y, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. 2005. Seasonal change in the balance between capacities of RuBP carboxylation and RuBP regeneration affects CO2 response of photosynthesis in Polygonum cuspidatum. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 755–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodermel S. 1999. Subunit control of Rubisco biosynthesis—a relic of an endosymbiotic past? Photosynthesis Research 59, 105–123. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rodermel S, Harley J, Jiang CZ, Tsai CH, Bogorad L. 1996. A mechanism for intergenomic integration: abundance of ribulose bisphosphate caarboxylase small-subunit protein influences the translation of the large-subunit mRNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 3881–3885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodermel SR, Abbott MS, Bogorad L. 1988. Nuclear-organelle interactions: nuclear antisense gene inhibits ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase enzyme levels in transformed tobacco plants. Cell 55, 673–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sasaki Y, Nakamura Y, Matsuno R. 1987. Regulation of gene expression of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase in greening pea leaves. Plant Molecular Biology 8, 375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Seneweera S, Makino A, Hirotsu N, Norton R, Suzuki Y. 2011. New insight into photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2: the role of leaf nitrogen and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase content in rice leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany 71, 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sugimoto H, Kusumi K, Tozawa Y, Yazaki J, Kishimoto N, Kikuchi S, Iba K. 2004. The virescent-2 mutation inhibits translation of plastid transcripts for the plastid genetic system at an early stage of chloroplast differentiation. Plant and Cell Physiology 45, 985–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Suzuki Y, Kawazu T, Koyama H. 2004. RNA isolation from siliques, dry seeds, and other tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. BioTechniques 37, 542–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Suzuki Y, Kihara-Doi T, Kawazu T, Miyake C, Makino A. 2010. Differences in Rubisco content and its synthesis in leaves at different positions in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. Plant Cell and Environment 33, 1314–1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Suzuki Y, Makino A, Mae T. 2001. Changes in the turnover of Rubisco and levels of mRNAs of rbcL and rbcS in rice leaves from emergence to senescence. Plant Cell and Environment 24, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar]
  39. Suzuki Y, Makino A. 2012. Availability of Rubisco small subunit up-regulates the transcript levels of large subunit for stoichiometric assembly of its holoenzyme in rice. Plant Physiology 160, 533–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Suzuki Y, Miyamoto T, Yoshizawa R, Mae T, Makino A. 2009. Rubisco content and photosynthesis of leaves at different positions in transgenic rice with an overexpression of RBCS. Plant Cell and Environment 32, 417–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Terashima I, Araya T, Miyazawa SI, Sone K, Yano S. 2005. Construction and maintenance of the optimal photosynthetic systems of the leaf, herbaceous plant and tree: an eco-developmental treatise. Annals of Botany 95, 507–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Theobald JC, Mitchell RAC, Parry MAJ, Lawlor DW. 1998. Estimating the excess investment in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in leaves of spring wheat grown under elevated CO2. Plant Physiology 118, 945–955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wostrikoff K, Stern D. 2007. Rubisco large-subunit translation is autoregulated in response to its assembly state in tobacco chloroplasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 6466–6471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yoneyama T, Arima K, Kumazawa K. 1975. Sample preparation from dilute ammonium solution for emission spectrographic analysis of heavy nitrogen. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 46, 146–147. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu C, Ziska L, Zhu J, Zeng Q, Xie A, Tang H, Jia X, Hasegawa T. 2011. The temporal and species dynamics of photosynthetic acclimation in flag leaves of rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) under elevated carbon dioxide. Physiologia Plantarum 145, 395–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES