Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1993 Mar;13(3):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1805

Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein.

H Wang 1, D J Stillman 1
PMCID: PMC359493  PMID: 8441414

Abstract

The yeast SIN3 gene (also known as SDI1, UME4, RPD1, and GAM2) has been identified as a transcriptional regulator. Previous work has led to the suggestion that SIN3 regulates transcription via interactions with DNA-binding proteins. Although the SIN3 protein is located in the nucleus, it does not bind directly to DNA in vitro. We have expressed a LexA-SIN3 fusion protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and show that this fusion protein represses transcription from heterologous promoters that contain lexA operators. The predicted amino acid sequence of the SIN3 protein contains four copies of a paired amphipathic helix (PAH) motif, similar to motifs found in HLH (helix-loop-helix) and TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) proteins, and these motifs are proposed to be involved in protein-protein interactions. We have conducted a deletion analysis of the SIN3 gene and show that the PAH motifs are required for SIN3 activity. Additionally, the C-terminal region of the SIN3 protein is sufficient for repression activity in a LexA-SIN3 fusion, and deletion of a PAH motif in this region inactivates this repression activity. A model is presented in which SIN3 recognizes specific DNA-binding proteins in vivo in order to repress transcription.

Full text

PDF
1805

Images in this article

1809Image
on p.1809
1809Image
on p.1809
1810Image
on p.1810
1810Image
on p.1810
1811Image
on p.1811
1811Image
on p.1811

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amati B., Dalton S., Brooks M. W., Littlewood T. D., Evan G. I., Land H. Transcriptional activation by the human c-Myc oncoprotein in yeast requires interaction with Max. Nature. 1992 Oct 1;359(6394):423–426. doi: 10.1038/359423a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeden L., Nasmyth K. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell. 1987 Feb 13;48(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckingham L. E., Wang H. T., Elder R. T., McCarroll R. M., Slater M. R., Esposito R. E. Nucleotide sequence and promoter analysis of SPO13, a meiosis-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9406–9410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dice J. F. Molecular determinants of protein half-lives in eukaryotic cells. FASEB J. 1987 Nov;1(5):349–357. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.1.5.2824267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dohrmann P. R., Butler G., Tamai K., Dorland S., Greene J. R., Thiele D. J., Stillman D. J. Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. Genes Dev. 1992 Jan;6(1):93–104. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goebl M., Yanagida M. The TPR snap helix: a novel protein repeat motif from mitosis to transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 May;16(5):173–177. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90070-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldberg A. L., St John A. C. Intracellular protein degradation in mammalian and bacterial cells: Part 2. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:747–803. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.003531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Golemis E. A., Brent R. Fused protein domains inhibit DNA binding by LexA. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3006–3014. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guarente L., Hoar E. Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7860–7864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirano T., Kinoshita N., Morikawa K., Yanagida M. Snap helix with knob and hole: essential repeats in S. pombe nuclear protein nuc2+. Cell. 1990 Jan 26;60(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90746-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones N. Transcriptional regulation by dimerization: two sides to an incestuous relationship. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):9–11. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90207-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamens J., Richardson P., Mosialos G., Brent R., Gilmore T. Oncogenic transformation by vrel requires an amino-terminal activation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2840–2847. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kleid D. G., Yansura D., Small B., Dowbenko D., Moore D. M., Grubman M. J., McKercher P. D., Morgan D. O., Robertson B. H., Bachrach H. L. Cloned viral protein vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease: responses in cattle and swine. Science. 1981 Dec 4;214(4525):1125–1129. doi: 10.1126/science.6272395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kostriken R., Strathern J. N., Klar A. J., Hicks J. B., Heffron F. A site-specific endonuclease essential for mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 1983 Nov;35(1):167–174. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90219-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Laurent B. C., Treitel M. A., Carlson M. Functional interdependence of the yeast SNF2, SNF5, and SNF6 proteins in transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 1;88(7):2687–2691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Laurent B. C., Treitel M. A., Carlson M. The SNF5 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a glutamine- and proline-rich transcriptional activator that affects expression of a broad spectrum of genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5616–5625. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Luche R. M., Smart W. C., Cooper T. G. Purification of the heteromeric protein binding to the URS1 transcriptional repression site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7412–7416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nasmyth K. Molecular analysis of a cell lineage. Nature. 1983 Apr 21;302(5910):670–676. doi: 10.1038/302670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nasmyth K., Stillman D., Kipling D. Both positive and negative regulators of HO transcription are required for mother-cell-specific mating-type switching in yeast. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):579–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruden D. M., Ma J., Li Y., Wood K., Ptashne M. Generating yeast transcriptional activators containing no yeast protein sequences. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):250–252. doi: 10.1038/350250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schultz J., Marshall-Carlson L., Carlson M. The N-terminal TPR region is the functional domain of SSN6, a nuclear phosphoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4744–4756. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:3–21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sikorski R. S., Boguski M. S., Goebl M., Hieter P. A repeating amino acid motif in CDC23 defines a family of proteins and a new relationship among genes required for mitosis and RNA synthesis. Cell. 1990 Jan 26;60(2):307–317. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90745-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith H. E., Mitchell A. P. A transcriptional cascade governs entry into meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 May;9(5):2142–2152. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.5.2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stern M., Jensen R., Herskowitz I. Five SWI genes are required for expression of the HO gene in yeast. J Mol Biol. 1984 Oct 5;178(4):853–868. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90315-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sternberg P. W., Stern M. J., Clark I., Herskowitz I. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):567–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Strich R., Slater M. R., Esposito R. E. Identification of negative regulatory genes that govern the expression of early meiotic genes in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):10018–10022. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sumrada R. A., Cooper T. G. Ubiquitous upstream repression sequences control activation of the inducible arginase gene in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):3997–4001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.3997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thompson C. C., Brown T. A., McKnight S. L. Convergence of Ets- and notch-related structural motifs in a heteromeric DNA binding complex. Science. 1991 Aug 16;253(5021):762–768. doi: 10.1126/science.1876833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Varshavsky A. The N-end rule. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):725–735. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90285-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vidal M., Buckley A. M., Hilger F., Gaber R. F. Direct selection for mutants with increased K+ transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1990 Jun;125(2):313–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.2.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vidal M., Strich R., Esposito R. E., Gaber R. F. RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;11(12):6306–6316. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.12.6306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Voronova A., Baltimore D. Mutations that disrupt DNA binding and dimer formation in the E47 helix-loop-helix protein map to distinct domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4722–4726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang H., Clark I., Nicholson P. R., Herskowitz I., Stillman D. J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5927–5936. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang H., Nicholson P. R., Stillman D. J. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA-binding protein involved in transcriptional regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;10(4):1743–1753. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.4.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang H., Stillman D. J. In vitro regulation of a SIN3-dependent DNA-binding activity by stimulatory and inhibitory factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9761–9765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. West R. W., Jr, Yocum R. R., Ptashne M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;4(11):2467–2478. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.11.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yoshida M., Kawaguchi H., Sakata Y., Kominami K., Hirano M., Shima H., Akada R., Yamashita I. Initiation of meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a novel protein kinase homologue. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Apr;221(2):176–186. doi: 10.1007/BF00261718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yoshimoto H., Ohmae M., Yamashita I. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAM2/SIN3 protein plays a role in both activation and repression of transcription. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):327–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00587597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES