Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1993 Jun;13(6):3514–3521. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.6.3514

Regulation of the proneural gene achaete by helix-loop-helix proteins.

C Martínez 1, J Modolell 1, J Garrell 1
PMCID: PMC359821  PMID: 8497266

Abstract

The Achaete (Ac) protein, a transcriptional regulator of the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) type, confers upon ectodermal cells the ability to become neural precursors. Its temporally and spatially regulated expression, together with that of the related Scute (Sc) protein, helps define the pattern of Drosophila melanogaster sensory organs. We have examined the transcriptional control of the ac gene and shown, using in vivo assays, that several E-boxes, putative interacting sites for bHLH proteins, present in the ac promoter are most important for ac regulation. They most likely mediate ac self-stimulation and sc trans-activation. We also demonstrate that ac transcription is negatively regulated in vivo by the gene extramacrochaetae (emc) in a manner dependent on Ac and Sc products. emc encodes an HLH protein that lacks the basic region and presumably antagonizes Ac and Sc function by sequestering these proteins in complexes unable to interact with DNA. Our results strongly support the model of negative regulation of emc on ac and sc transcription through titration of their products. As currently thought, this seems accomplished by heterodimerization via the HLH domain, because an amino acid substitution in this region abolishes the emc antagonistic effect both in vitro and in vivo.

Full text

PDF
3515

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benezra R., Davis R. L., Lockshon D., Turner D. L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackwell T. K., Weintraub H. Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1104–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.2174572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botas J., Moscoso del Prado J., García-Bellido A. Gene-dose titration analysis in the search of trans-regulatory genes in Drosophila. EMBO J. 1982;1(3):307–310. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01165.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabrera C. V., Alonso M. C. Transcriptional activation by heterodimers of the achaete-scute and daughterless gene products of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):2965–2973. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07847.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campuzano S., Modolell J. Patterning of the Drosophila nervous system: the achaete-scute gene complex. Trends Genet. 1992 Jun;8(6):202–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90234-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cubas P., Modolell J. The extramacrochaetae gene provides information for sensory organ patterning. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3385–3393. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05417.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cubas P., de Celis J. F., Campuzano S., Modolell J. Proneural clusters of achaete-scute expression and the generation of sensory organs in the Drosophila imaginal wing disc. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):996–1008. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis R. L., Cheng P. F., Lassar A. B., Weintraub H. The MyoD DNA binding domain contains a recognition code for muscle-specific gene activation. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):733–746. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90088-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis H. M., Spann D. R., Posakony J. W. extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):27–38. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90212-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. García-Bellido A. Genetic Analysis of the Achaete-Scute System of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1979 Mar;91(3):491–520. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. García-Bellido A., Santamaria P. Developmental Analysis of the Achaete-Scute System of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):469–486. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garrell J., Campuzano S. The helix-loop-helix domain: a common motif for bristles, muscles and sex. Bioessays. 1991 Oct;13(10):493–498. doi: 10.1002/bies.950131002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garrell J., Modolell J. The Drosophila extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90213-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghysen A., Dambly-Chaudiere C. Genesis of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Trends Genet. 1989 Aug;5(8):251–255. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ho S. N., Hunt H. D., Horton R. M., Pullen J. K., Pease L. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1989 Apr 15;77(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marchuk D., Drumm M., Saulino A., Collins F. S. Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Mar 11;19(5):1154–1154. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.5.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martínez C., Modolell J. Cross-regulatory interactions between the proneural achaete and scute genes of Drosophila. Science. 1991 Mar 22;251(5000):1485–1487. doi: 10.1126/science.1900954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Vaessin H., Caudy M., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N., Cabrera C. V., Buskin J. N., Hauschka S. D., Lassar A. B. Interactions between heterologous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):537–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Romani S., Campuzano S., Macagno E. R., Modolell J. Expression of achaete and scute genes in Drosophila imaginal discs and their function in sensory organ development. Genes Dev. 1989 Jul;3(7):997–1007. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schröder C., Tautz D., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback. EMBO J. 1988 Sep;7(9):2881–2887. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Skeath J. B., Carroll S. B. Regulation of achaete-scute gene expression and sensory organ pattern formation in the Drosophila wing. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):984–995. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Doren M., Ellis H. M., Posakony J. W. The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes. Development. 1991 Sep;113(1):245–255. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.1.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Doren M., Powell P. A., Pasternak D., Singson A., Posakony J. W. Spatial regulation of proneural gene activity: auto- and cross-activation of achaete is antagonized by extramacrochaetae. Genes Dev. 1992 Dec;6(12B):2592–2605. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Villares R., Cabrera C. V. The achaete-scute gene complex of D. melanogaster: conserved domains in a subset of genes required for neurogenesis and their homology to myc. Cell. 1987 Jul 31;50(3):415–424. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES